Incontinence
Associated Dermatitis
  Mikel Gray, PhD, FNP, PNP, CUNP, CCCN, FAAN
           Professor & Nurse Practitioner
    University of Virginia Department of Urology
Anatomy & Physiology

   Largest organ (6 pounds or 3,000 sq inches); its
    thickness varies from 0.5mm – 6 mm
   Functions:
    – Barrier: against toxins in external environment and for
      the prevention of excessive fluid & electrolyte loss
      from internal environment
    – Thermoregulation
    – Sensory organ/ communication
    – Immune functions
    – Vitamin D metabolism

     Burns T et al. Textbook of Dermatology, 2004. Mass: Blackwell Science
Moisture barrier of the skin
– Stratum corneum: dead
  keratinocytes or corneocytes
– Lipid matrix: slows
  movement of water &
  electrolytes
– Water: hydrates corneocytes
– pH: (usually 5.0-5.9) forms
  an acid mantle
– Bacterial flora: competes
  with pathogens to prevent
  infection
– Temperature: regulates
  permeability
How do Clinicians & Researchers
        Measure the skin’s Moisture Barrier?

   No clinical test for measuring
    moisture barrier
   Researchers measure
    Transepidermal water loss (TEWL);
    which is the rate of passive diffusion
    of H20 from internal environment to
    external environment (differs from
    perspiration)
   The perineal skin and scrotum have
    the highest TEWL os any surfaces of
    the body, skin over back is the
    lowest
                                    Loffler H, Hautarzt. 50(11):769-78, 1999
                                               Hautarzt.
Perineal Skin at the
      Extremes of Life

   Barrier function in the neonate
    – Less robust than adults, particularly premature infants
         Higher TEWL

         Higher rates of percutaneous absorption

         Greater risk for erosion, stripping, pressure injury

    – Cornification of skin begins about GW 20
    – Vernix contains FFA, cholesterol & ceramides, thus acting as
      proxy while skin develops
    – Full-term skin contains 10-20 layers of stratum corneum, skin
      in premature baby has 2-3


                                        Lund C et al. JOGNN 1999; 28(3): 241.
Perineal Skin at the
           Extremes of Life
    Aging Skin: gradual decline
     in barrier function
      – ↑ TEWL
      – Overall thickness declines
      – ↓ Collagen & elastin
      – Local changes in capillary
        beds reflect systemic
        changes in
        microcirculation

Ghadially R. American J Contact Dermatitis 1998; 9(3): 162.
Searching for an appropriate name:
        Perineal Dermatitis?
   Perineum: region between the thighs, in the female
    between the vulva and the anus, in males, between the
    scrotum and the anus1
   Dermatitis: inflammation of the skin1, itself a broad term
    may be divided into2
    –   Atopic (eczema)
    –   Allergic
    –   Irritant
    – Multiple other terms used, dermatoses used to describe
      “well defined endogenous skin dysfunction”2

            1. Online Medical Dictionary, http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?action=Home&query
                                           http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?action=
            2. Burns T et al. Textbook of Dermatology, 2004. Mass: Blackwell Science.
Searching for an appropriate name:
     Diaper or Nappy Dermatitis?
   Strengths
    – Clearly associated with incontinence and use of
      one type of containment device, infant diaper
      (often called nappy in UK) or adult
      containment brief
   Limitations
    – Unfairly blames one type of containment
      device as cause of the problem itself
    – Possible pejorative interpretation when applied
      to adults
Searching for an appropriate name:
         Incontinence Associated Dermatitis

       Name selected from alternatives at
       consensus conference held in Chicago,
       IL summer of 2005, results of conference
       published in JWOCN, 20071
      Describes etiology and outcome of
       condition

* Supported by unrestricted educational grand from SAGE, Inc.
1. Gray M, Bliss DZ, Doughty DB< Ermer-Seltun K, Kennedy-Evans KL, Palmer MH. JWOCN
34(1): 57-69.
Moisture Associated Skin Damage
      (MASD)
   IAD is part of larger etiological framework
    called MASD
    – Intertrigo: inflammation in skin folds related to
      perspiration, friction and bacterial/ fungal
      bioburden
    – Periwound maceration: skin breakdown from
      wound exudate, related to volume, constituents
      or exudate & bacterial bioburden
    – IAD: urine, stool, containment device, secondary
      cutaneous infection – typically fungal
Epidemiology of IAD
 Long-term care literature reports
  – Prevalence of 5.6%-50%
  – Incidence of 3.4%-25%

 Acute-care
  – Incontinence prevalence: 20%
  – IAD prevalence was 10.9% of the general
    hospital population
  – IAD prevalence was 54% in incontinent
    patients in 3 acute-care hospitals
   Lyder, et al., 1992; Bale, et al., 2004; Bliss, et al., 2005; Junkin, More-Lisi, Selekof, 2005
                                                                                    Selekof,
2005 IAD Prevalence Study

                                                976
                                        Total number of
                                       patients surveyed



                                                                            • 27% had IAD
                                           20.3% (198)
    35% had                                                                 • 33% had a pressure
                                           prevalence of
  Foley catheter                                                              ulcer
                                           incontinence
(deemed continent)                                                          • 18% had a probable
                                           urine or stool
                                                                              fungal Infection


                           21% had more than 1 type of injury

Junkin J, Selekof J. IAD prevalence in acute care. WOCN National Conference, June 2006 Minneapolis, MN.
IAD: Effect of Urine on Skin
 Water: decreases skin
  hardness, renders it more
  susceptible to friction and
  erosion
 Ammonia: raises pH,
  promotes pathogenic
  growth, disrupts acid
  mantle, activates fecal
  enzymes, alters normal
  flora of skin Gray M. Journal of WOC Nursing 2004; 31(1 Suppl):S2-9 .
Impact of Stool on Skin


   Intestinal colonization acts as a reservoir for
    potential pathogenic substances1
    – VRE
    – MRSA
    – Clostridium difficile
    – Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    – Multiple other antimicrobial resistant gram-
      negative bacilli

              Steifel & Doskey, 2004; Current Infectious Disease Report 2004; 6:420.
                        Doskey,
Impact of Stool on Skin
   Disruption of the usual microflora provides
    opportunity for pathogenic colonization1
    – Normal colon: 1012 CFU per Gm with obligate
      anaerobe counts exceeding parasitic organisms
      ~1000:1; important defense against pathogens
    – Antimicrobials that are excreted into the intestinal
      tract disrupt this balance
    – Result in skin contamination in 83% and
      environmental surface contamination in 67%,
      diarrhea and fecal incontinence magnify risk2

            1.   Steifel & Doskey, 2004; Current Infectious Disease Report 2004; 6:420.
                           Doskey,
            2.   Donskey et al. NEJM 2000; 343: 1925.
Impact of Stool on Skin

   Disruption of gastric acid content in stomach
    – Healthy individual: >99% of coliform bacteria
      ingested killed within 30 minutes because of
      gastric acid secretion1
    – Use of medications that inhibit stomach acid
      production associated with C. difficile, S. aureus,
      VRE and antibiotic resistant gam negative
      infections2
1.Donskey, Clinical infectious Disease 2004; 39: 219.
2. Cunningham et al., J. Hospital Infection 2003; 36: 149.
Pathophysiology

   Use of absorptive containment devices
    – Exacerbate overhydration by promoting perspiration
      & retaining urine and stool; with padding alone:
        TEWL increases 3-4 fold within days

        CO2 emission increases > 4 fold

        pH increases from 4.4 to 7.1 (without incontinence)

    – Emerging data supports direct role in PU risk…

    1. Grove GL et al. Clinical Problems in Dermatology 1998; 26:183
    2. Zimmerer RE et al. Pediatric Dermatology 1986; 3: 95.
    3. Zhai H et al. Skin Research & Technology 2002; 8:13.
IAD & Pressure Ulceration

   Precise nature of association not understood
   Fecal incontinence strongly associated with PU
    risk, UI is not1-4
    Analysis rarely based on PU stage, few articles
    that use stage associate FI/ UI with stage I & II3
   Both FI & UI associated with increased time and
    cost to wound healing5
1. Maklebust J & Magnan MA Advances in Wound Care 1994; 7(6): 25.
2. Gunninberg L. Journal of Wound Care 2004; 13(7): 286.
3. Fader M et al. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2003; 12(3):374.
4. Berlowitz DR et al. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2001; 49(7):866-71.
5. Narayan S et al. Jounal of WOCN 2005; 32(3): 163.
IAD & Pressure Ulceration

   Does FI or UI indirectly contribute to pressure
    ulcer risk?
     – Skin wetted with synthetic urine or water shows a
       significant decrease in hardness, temperature, and
       blood flow during pressure load when compared to
       dry sites1
     – Absorbent products may enhance the risk for
       pressure ulceration by creating areas of increased
       interface pressure, even when used in conjunction
       with a pressure reducing or relieving device2

    1. Mayrovitz HN, Sims N Adv Skin Wound Care 2001;14(6):302.
    2. Fader M et al. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004; 48(6): 569.
Pathophysiology
Normal skin




Epidermis


Dermis




Hypodermis
Irritants            Perspiration
                        Urine
               Stool (especially liquid)
                 Exudate / Effluent




Penetration
of irritants

Elevated
TEWL


Altered pH
Inflammation


Cracking of
skin

Redness

Swelling

Release of
cytokines

Inflammation
Denudation




Erosion
(denudation)
of skin
Screen for Redness, Inflammation
IAD: Diagnosis
IAD: Diagnosis

   Inspect the skin for
    erythema, redness,
    cracking, swelling,
    vesicles
   Determine location
    of skin damage –
    does it lie in skin
    fold or over bony
    prominence,
    underneath
    containment
    device?
IAD: Diagnosis

   Look in Skin Folds
    – Opposing skin surfaces trap
      moisture
    – Warm moist environment
      encourages bacterial and
      fungal colonization,
      overgrowth and infection
    – Friction created as skin folds
      rub against one another
IAD: Diagnosis

   Look for erosion of
    skin
   Partial thickness
    erosion common
   Full thickness wound
    implies pressure or
    shear and pressure
    ulceration
IAD: Diagnosis

     Look for secondary
      cutaneous infection,
      especially candidiasis
       – Opportunistic infection
         with candida albicans
       – Thrives in warm, moist
         environment & damages
         stratum corneum
       – Seen in 18% of one group
         of 976 acute care
         inpatients1
1. Junkin J, Selekof J. IAD prevalence in acute care. WOCN National Conference, June 2006
Minneapolis, MN.
Differentiate MASD from
Pressure Ulceration




                Gray M et al. JWOCN 2007; 34(2):.
What type of skin damage?
IAD: Prevention

   Principles of Prevention: 1) cleanse, 2)
    moisturize, 3) protect
    – Gentle cleansing: NO scrubbing
    – Select a cleanser with acceptable pH
      & no irritants
    – Moisturize dried areas to maximize
      lipid barrier
    – Apply moisture barrier as indicated
Hospital        Disposable
Washcloth Vs.   Washcloth

 Basin              Sage
Preventive Skin Care:
       Cleanse
   Soap & Water
    – What is the clinical evidence for soap &
      water as a perineal skin cleanser
        alkaline pH raises pH more than cleansing with
         pH ‘balanced’ cleansers; alkaline pH associated
         with skin irritation and severity of IAD1
        cleansing requires significantly more time than
         with cleansers1,2
        2 small RCT have not demonstrated greater risk
         for dermatitis in frail elder patients1,2
1. Byers et al. JWOCN, 1995, 187.
2. Lewis-Byers et al. OWM, 2002, 44.
Preventive Skin Care:
    Cleanse
   Incontinence skin cleansers
    – ‘pH Balanced’ designed to maintain the
      acid mantle of perineal skin
    – Many described as “no rinse” (no water
      required)
    – Require significantly less time than
      traditional cleansing with soap and water
    – Many contain emollients (skin softeners) or
      moisturizers to preserve lipid barrier, thus
      combining 2 steps into a single action
Preventive Skin Care:
     Perineal Skin Cleansers
Product            Key Components                 Notes

Aloe-Vesta 2-n-1   Cleanser, moisturizer* (aloe   3-n-1 adds
and 3- n-1         vera), emollient               emollient, lemon
                                                  scented
Sensi-care         Cleanser, emollient,           No scents, no
                   moisturizer                    preservatives
Cavilon 1-step     Cleanser, moisturizer*,        Labeled as “Skin
                   emollient, moisture barrier    care lotion”


Cavilon Cleanser   Cleanser, moisturizer,         Humectant acts as
                   humectant                      moisture barrier
Preventive Skin Care:
      Perineal Skin Cleansers
Product            Key Components           Notes

DermaRite 3 in 1   Cleanser, moisturizer    Advocates use as
                                            shampoo as well
Peri-Fresh         Cleanser, moisturizer*   “Fresh fruit” fragrance


Perigene           Cleanser, moisturizer    No alcohol, fragrances,
                                            preservatives, dyes


Provon Perineal    P Wash: cleanser, vit. E, Wash has “herbal”
Wash &             moisturizer*,             fragrance, AB has
Antibacterial      antibacterial in one      “deodorizer”
                   preparation
Preventive Skin Care:
      Perineal Skin Cleansers

Product             Key Components            Notes
Restore Clean &     Cleanser, moisturizer,    3-n-1 product
Moist               emollient
Remedy 4-n-1        Cleanser, moisturizer,    3-n-1 product with
antimicrobial       emollient, benzalkonium   antimicrobial agent
cleanser            chloride

Carafoam skin &     Cleanser, moisturizer     Dispensed as foam, mild
perineal cleanser                             fragrance

Peri-wash II        Cleanser, benzethonium    Antiseptic, fragrance
                    chloride                  (deodorizer)
Preventive Skin Care and
    Contemporary Assessment
   Comfort Bath:
    cleanser &
    moisturizer
   Deodorant Comfort
    Bath: cleanser,
    moisturizer &
    deodorizing agent
    (Exopheryl™)
Preventive Skin Care

   Typical Protocol
    – Routine daily cleansing for
      everyone
    – Cleanse & moisturize with
      each major incontinent
      episode
    – Apply moisture barrier for
      significant UI, fecal or double
      incontinence
    – Comfort Shield: cleanser,
      moisturizer, 3% dimethicone
      skin protectant
Risk Factors
              for Pressure Ulcer Development

         “…The odds of having a pressure ulcer were
        22 times greater for hospitalized adult patients
       with fecal incontinence compared to hospitalized
      patients without fecal incontinence…and 37.5 times
      greater in patients who had both impaired mobility
                    and fecal incontinence”

JoAnn Maklebust, MSN, RN, CS, NP and Morris A. Magnan, MSN, RN,
“Risk Factors Associated with Having a Pressure Ulcer: A Secondary Data Analysis”, Advances in Wound Care, November 1994
Facts About Pressure Ulcers

      80% of pressure ulcers in hospital are Stage I or Stage II.1


      Almost half of all pressure ulcers form on the sacrum (36.9%) and
        ischium (8.0%).2

      A healthcare facility will spend between $400K and $700K
        annually on pressure ulcer treatment.3

      JACHO lists prevention of health care associated pressure ulcers
        as a patient safety goal.4
1. Whittington KT, Briones R, “National Prevalence and Incidence Study: 6-Year Sequential Acute Care Data,” Adv Skin Wound Care.
2004 Nov/Dec;17(9):490-4. 2. Amlung SR, Miller WL, Bosley LM, Adv. Skin Wound Care. 2001 Nov/Dec; 14(6): 297-301. 3.
Robinson, C; Gioekner, M; Bush, S; Copas, J; et al. Determining the efficacy of a pressure ulcer prevention program by collecting
prevalence and incidence data: a unit-based effort. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003. May: 49(5):44-6. 48-51. 4.
http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/07_ltc_npsgs.htm
Clever et al. - Pressure Ulcer Study
              “Evaluating the Efficacy of a Uniquely Delivered Skin Protectant
             and Its Effect on the Formation of Sacral/Buttock Pressure Ulcers”*

              Average Monthly Incidence of Sacral/Buttock Pressure Ulcers

      Old standard of care vs.
                                                4.7%
       using Comfort Shield®
      as preventative in new                                                                             Reduction in Incidence
          standard of care                                                                            Of sacral/buttock pressure
                                                                                0.5%                            ulcers




                           Old Standard of Care                     New Standard of Care
                                   7/00 – 3/01                               5/01 – 7/01
                                                                             2/02 – 4/02

*Comfort Shield® was used on all incontinent patients and was the only variable changed from the control period.
Clever K, Smith G, Bowser C, Monroe K
Long-Term Care Unit, Fulton County Medical Center, McConnellsburg, PA, Ostomy/Wound Management. Dec 2002;48(12):60-7.
“The Development of Cost-Effective
                            Quality Care for the Patient with
                            Incontinence”
    Group A = Cleansing spray, washcloths, skin barrier
    (multi- step process and the current practice).
   Group B = Shield Barrier Cloths.
   Group C = Disposable washcloth without dimethicone.
  Results:
   • Group A = $6.13 per patient per day; 10% skin breakdown.
   • Group B = $5.40 per patient per day; 8% skin breakdown.
   • Group C = Discontinued in week 4 due to 29% skin breakdown.
   • 2003 72 consults due to IAD and 2004 10 consults due to IAD.




                        http://www.sageproducts.com/education/shSymposiaPres.asp
Dieter L, Drolshagen C, Blum K, Cost-effective, quality care for the patient with incontinence. Research Poster Abstract presented at
WOCN , Minneapolis, MN June 2006
“Developing a Comprehensive Fecal
                          Incontinence Management Program…
                          (for IAD)”


         Program, guidelines and algorithm for clinical
          decision making to include: Protection, Treatment
          and Containment devices.
         33% of hospitalized patients have fecal incontinence.
         Fecal Incontinence increases PU risk 22 times and
          30% if immobile.
         Shield Barrier cloths for prevention of IAD;
          Xenaderm for Treatment of IAD and guidelines for
          external and internal fecal containment devices.
                   http://www.sageproducts.com/education/shSymposiaPres.asp
Gray DP, Developing a comprehensive fecal incontinence management program.
Practice Innovation Poster Abstract presented at WOCN, Minneapolis, MN June 2006.
Treat Underlying Incontinence

   Consider Diversion of
    Stool When Indicated
   Anal Pouch
     – Synthetic, adhesive
       skin barrier attached to
       pouch
   Bowel Management
    System
    – Zassi BMS or Flexiseal
   Nasal Trumpet
    – Off label use
Treat Underlying Incontinence
   Temporary Diversion for UI:
    Indwelling Catheter
     – Indications
       UI complicated by urinary retention,
        obstruction & only when CIC not feasible
       Stage 3-4 PU for transient diversion only

    – Selection criteria
       Siliconeor Lubricath
       Smaller French size
Sluser Study – Consistent Treatment
Sluser Study – Consistent Treatment
Sluser Study – Consistent Treatment
IAD: Treatment

   Goals
    – Establish or continue cleansing/
      moisturization/ skin barrier program
    – Restore epidermal integrity
    – Minimize exposure to irritants (Manage
      UI or Fecal incontinence)
    – Treat secondary cutaneous infections
    – Create environment for wound healing
IAD: Treatment

   Inert Skin Barriers
    – Deflect drainage and
      provides moisture
      barrier
   Most common
    contain
    –   Petrolatum
    –   Dimethicone
    –   Zinc oxide
IAD: Treatment

   Inert moisture barriers
    – No evidence base could
      be identified supporting
      efficacy for existing IAD
    – Ample anecdotal
      evidence supports role in
      mild to moderate cases in
      outpatient/ home setting
    – Disadvantages include
      removal (zinc oxide in
      particular)
IAD: Treatment

   Topical Dressings
     – Hydrocolloids
     – Thin film dressings
   Act as barrier to urine &
    stool
   Promote moist environment
    for wound healing
   Can be combined with
    topical treatments
IAD: Treatment

   Topical Dressings
    – Maintaining adherence
      significant challenge
    – Skin surfaces complex
    – Borders often roll when
      ointments or
      moisturizing products
      have been applied
    – Undermining of urine
      or stool may occur
IAD: Treatment

   BCT agents
   BCT Ointment (Xenaderm)
    – Balsam Peru, Castor Oil, Trypsin in
      ointment base
    – Applied to dermatitis twice daily or with
      major cleansing
   BCT gel (Optase)
   NOTE: FDA has ruled out further
    reimbursement pending documentation
    of efficacy
IAD Treatment:
    Secondary Complications
   Candidiasis
    – Topical antifungals are effective for the
      treatment of cutaneous infections
    – Effective agents include the polyene
      antibiotics, azoles and the allylamines1
    – Resistance to antifungals is emerging,
      careful monitoring of research literature is
      essential

                           1. Evans & Gray, JWOCN, 30(1), 2003
IAD and IHI as it relates to Sage

   Facilities need to follow the Six Elements
    of Pressure Ulcer Prevention (from IHI)
    – Asssess the skin upon admission
    – Reassess the skin daily
    – Inspect the skin daily
    – Manage moisture
    – Optimize nutrition and hydration
    – Minimize pressure
Summary: Manage Moisture: Keep
                  the Patient Dry and Moisturize Skin

         Provide supplies at the bedside of each at-risk patient who is
          incontinent. This provides the staff with the supplies that they need to
          immediately clean, dry, and protect the patient’s skin after each
          episode of incontinence.

         Provide under-pads that pull the moisture away from the skin, and
          limit the use of disposable briefs or containment garments if at all
          possible.

         Provide pre-moistened, disposable barrier wipes to help cleanse,
          moisturize, deodorize, and protect patients from perineal dermatitis
          due to incontinence.

http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/
Incontinence Associated Dermatitis by Prof Dr Mikel Gray

Incontinence Associated Dermatitis by Prof Dr Mikel Gray

  • 1.
    Incontinence Associated Dermatitis Mikel Gray, PhD, FNP, PNP, CUNP, CCCN, FAAN Professor & Nurse Practitioner University of Virginia Department of Urology
  • 2.
    Anatomy & Physiology  Largest organ (6 pounds or 3,000 sq inches); its thickness varies from 0.5mm – 6 mm  Functions: – Barrier: against toxins in external environment and for the prevention of excessive fluid & electrolyte loss from internal environment – Thermoregulation – Sensory organ/ communication – Immune functions – Vitamin D metabolism Burns T et al. Textbook of Dermatology, 2004. Mass: Blackwell Science
  • 3.
    Moisture barrier ofthe skin – Stratum corneum: dead keratinocytes or corneocytes – Lipid matrix: slows movement of water & electrolytes – Water: hydrates corneocytes – pH: (usually 5.0-5.9) forms an acid mantle – Bacterial flora: competes with pathogens to prevent infection – Temperature: regulates permeability
  • 4.
    How do Clinicians& Researchers Measure the skin’s Moisture Barrier?  No clinical test for measuring moisture barrier  Researchers measure Transepidermal water loss (TEWL); which is the rate of passive diffusion of H20 from internal environment to external environment (differs from perspiration)  The perineal skin and scrotum have the highest TEWL os any surfaces of the body, skin over back is the lowest Loffler H, Hautarzt. 50(11):769-78, 1999 Hautarzt.
  • 5.
    Perineal Skin atthe Extremes of Life  Barrier function in the neonate – Less robust than adults, particularly premature infants  Higher TEWL  Higher rates of percutaneous absorption  Greater risk for erosion, stripping, pressure injury – Cornification of skin begins about GW 20 – Vernix contains FFA, cholesterol & ceramides, thus acting as proxy while skin develops – Full-term skin contains 10-20 layers of stratum corneum, skin in premature baby has 2-3 Lund C et al. JOGNN 1999; 28(3): 241.
  • 6.
    Perineal Skin atthe Extremes of Life  Aging Skin: gradual decline in barrier function – ↑ TEWL – Overall thickness declines – ↓ Collagen & elastin – Local changes in capillary beds reflect systemic changes in microcirculation Ghadially R. American J Contact Dermatitis 1998; 9(3): 162.
  • 7.
    Searching for anappropriate name: Perineal Dermatitis?  Perineum: region between the thighs, in the female between the vulva and the anus, in males, between the scrotum and the anus1  Dermatitis: inflammation of the skin1, itself a broad term may be divided into2 – Atopic (eczema) – Allergic – Irritant – Multiple other terms used, dermatoses used to describe “well defined endogenous skin dysfunction”2 1. Online Medical Dictionary, http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?action=Home&query http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?action= 2. Burns T et al. Textbook of Dermatology, 2004. Mass: Blackwell Science.
  • 8.
    Searching for anappropriate name: Diaper or Nappy Dermatitis?  Strengths – Clearly associated with incontinence and use of one type of containment device, infant diaper (often called nappy in UK) or adult containment brief  Limitations – Unfairly blames one type of containment device as cause of the problem itself – Possible pejorative interpretation when applied to adults
  • 9.
    Searching for anappropriate name: Incontinence Associated Dermatitis  Name selected from alternatives at consensus conference held in Chicago, IL summer of 2005, results of conference published in JWOCN, 20071  Describes etiology and outcome of condition * Supported by unrestricted educational grand from SAGE, Inc. 1. Gray M, Bliss DZ, Doughty DB< Ermer-Seltun K, Kennedy-Evans KL, Palmer MH. JWOCN 34(1): 57-69.
  • 10.
    Moisture Associated SkinDamage (MASD)  IAD is part of larger etiological framework called MASD – Intertrigo: inflammation in skin folds related to perspiration, friction and bacterial/ fungal bioburden – Periwound maceration: skin breakdown from wound exudate, related to volume, constituents or exudate & bacterial bioburden – IAD: urine, stool, containment device, secondary cutaneous infection – typically fungal
  • 11.
    Epidemiology of IAD Long-term care literature reports – Prevalence of 5.6%-50% – Incidence of 3.4%-25%  Acute-care – Incontinence prevalence: 20% – IAD prevalence was 10.9% of the general hospital population – IAD prevalence was 54% in incontinent patients in 3 acute-care hospitals Lyder, et al., 1992; Bale, et al., 2004; Bliss, et al., 2005; Junkin, More-Lisi, Selekof, 2005 Selekof,
  • 12.
    2005 IAD PrevalenceStudy 976 Total number of patients surveyed • 27% had IAD 20.3% (198) 35% had • 33% had a pressure prevalence of Foley catheter ulcer incontinence (deemed continent) • 18% had a probable urine or stool fungal Infection 21% had more than 1 type of injury Junkin J, Selekof J. IAD prevalence in acute care. WOCN National Conference, June 2006 Minneapolis, MN.
  • 13.
    IAD: Effect ofUrine on Skin  Water: decreases skin hardness, renders it more susceptible to friction and erosion  Ammonia: raises pH, promotes pathogenic growth, disrupts acid mantle, activates fecal enzymes, alters normal flora of skin Gray M. Journal of WOC Nursing 2004; 31(1 Suppl):S2-9 .
  • 14.
    Impact of Stoolon Skin  Intestinal colonization acts as a reservoir for potential pathogenic substances1 – VRE – MRSA – Clostridium difficile – Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus – Multiple other antimicrobial resistant gram- negative bacilli Steifel & Doskey, 2004; Current Infectious Disease Report 2004; 6:420. Doskey,
  • 15.
    Impact of Stoolon Skin  Disruption of the usual microflora provides opportunity for pathogenic colonization1 – Normal colon: 1012 CFU per Gm with obligate anaerobe counts exceeding parasitic organisms ~1000:1; important defense against pathogens – Antimicrobials that are excreted into the intestinal tract disrupt this balance – Result in skin contamination in 83% and environmental surface contamination in 67%, diarrhea and fecal incontinence magnify risk2 1. Steifel & Doskey, 2004; Current Infectious Disease Report 2004; 6:420. Doskey, 2. Donskey et al. NEJM 2000; 343: 1925.
  • 16.
    Impact of Stoolon Skin  Disruption of gastric acid content in stomach – Healthy individual: >99% of coliform bacteria ingested killed within 30 minutes because of gastric acid secretion1 – Use of medications that inhibit stomach acid production associated with C. difficile, S. aureus, VRE and antibiotic resistant gam negative infections2 1.Donskey, Clinical infectious Disease 2004; 39: 219. 2. Cunningham et al., J. Hospital Infection 2003; 36: 149.
  • 17.
    Pathophysiology  Use of absorptive containment devices – Exacerbate overhydration by promoting perspiration & retaining urine and stool; with padding alone:  TEWL increases 3-4 fold within days  CO2 emission increases > 4 fold  pH increases from 4.4 to 7.1 (without incontinence) – Emerging data supports direct role in PU risk… 1. Grove GL et al. Clinical Problems in Dermatology 1998; 26:183 2. Zimmerer RE et al. Pediatric Dermatology 1986; 3: 95. 3. Zhai H et al. Skin Research & Technology 2002; 8:13.
  • 18.
    IAD & PressureUlceration  Precise nature of association not understood  Fecal incontinence strongly associated with PU risk, UI is not1-4  Analysis rarely based on PU stage, few articles that use stage associate FI/ UI with stage I & II3  Both FI & UI associated with increased time and cost to wound healing5 1. Maklebust J & Magnan MA Advances in Wound Care 1994; 7(6): 25. 2. Gunninberg L. Journal of Wound Care 2004; 13(7): 286. 3. Fader M et al. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2003; 12(3):374. 4. Berlowitz DR et al. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2001; 49(7):866-71. 5. Narayan S et al. Jounal of WOCN 2005; 32(3): 163.
  • 19.
    IAD & PressureUlceration  Does FI or UI indirectly contribute to pressure ulcer risk? – Skin wetted with synthetic urine or water shows a significant decrease in hardness, temperature, and blood flow during pressure load when compared to dry sites1 – Absorbent products may enhance the risk for pressure ulceration by creating areas of increased interface pressure, even when used in conjunction with a pressure reducing or relieving device2 1. Mayrovitz HN, Sims N Adv Skin Wound Care 2001;14(6):302. 2. Fader M et al. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004; 48(6): 569.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Irritants Perspiration Urine Stool (especially liquid) Exudate / Effluent Penetration of irritants Elevated TEWL Altered pH
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Screen for Redness,Inflammation
  • 26.
  • 27.
    IAD: Diagnosis  Inspect the skin for erythema, redness, cracking, swelling, vesicles  Determine location of skin damage – does it lie in skin fold or over bony prominence, underneath containment device?
  • 28.
    IAD: Diagnosis  Look in Skin Folds – Opposing skin surfaces trap moisture – Warm moist environment encourages bacterial and fungal colonization, overgrowth and infection – Friction created as skin folds rub against one another
  • 29.
    IAD: Diagnosis  Look for erosion of skin  Partial thickness erosion common  Full thickness wound implies pressure or shear and pressure ulceration
  • 30.
    IAD: Diagnosis  Look for secondary cutaneous infection, especially candidiasis – Opportunistic infection with candida albicans – Thrives in warm, moist environment & damages stratum corneum – Seen in 18% of one group of 976 acute care inpatients1 1. Junkin J, Selekof J. IAD prevalence in acute care. WOCN National Conference, June 2006 Minneapolis, MN.
  • 31.
    Differentiate MASD from PressureUlceration Gray M et al. JWOCN 2007; 34(2):.
  • 32.
    What type ofskin damage?
  • 33.
    IAD: Prevention  Principles of Prevention: 1) cleanse, 2) moisturize, 3) protect – Gentle cleansing: NO scrubbing – Select a cleanser with acceptable pH & no irritants – Moisturize dried areas to maximize lipid barrier – Apply moisture barrier as indicated
  • 34.
    Hospital Disposable Washcloth Vs. Washcloth Basin Sage
  • 35.
    Preventive Skin Care: Cleanse  Soap & Water – What is the clinical evidence for soap & water as a perineal skin cleanser  alkaline pH raises pH more than cleansing with pH ‘balanced’ cleansers; alkaline pH associated with skin irritation and severity of IAD1  cleansing requires significantly more time than with cleansers1,2  2 small RCT have not demonstrated greater risk for dermatitis in frail elder patients1,2 1. Byers et al. JWOCN, 1995, 187. 2. Lewis-Byers et al. OWM, 2002, 44.
  • 36.
    Preventive Skin Care: Cleanse  Incontinence skin cleansers – ‘pH Balanced’ designed to maintain the acid mantle of perineal skin – Many described as “no rinse” (no water required) – Require significantly less time than traditional cleansing with soap and water – Many contain emollients (skin softeners) or moisturizers to preserve lipid barrier, thus combining 2 steps into a single action
  • 37.
    Preventive Skin Care: Perineal Skin Cleansers Product Key Components Notes Aloe-Vesta 2-n-1 Cleanser, moisturizer* (aloe 3-n-1 adds and 3- n-1 vera), emollient emollient, lemon scented Sensi-care Cleanser, emollient, No scents, no moisturizer preservatives Cavilon 1-step Cleanser, moisturizer*, Labeled as “Skin emollient, moisture barrier care lotion” Cavilon Cleanser Cleanser, moisturizer, Humectant acts as humectant moisture barrier
  • 38.
    Preventive Skin Care: Perineal Skin Cleansers Product Key Components Notes DermaRite 3 in 1 Cleanser, moisturizer Advocates use as shampoo as well Peri-Fresh Cleanser, moisturizer* “Fresh fruit” fragrance Perigene Cleanser, moisturizer No alcohol, fragrances, preservatives, dyes Provon Perineal P Wash: cleanser, vit. E, Wash has “herbal” Wash & moisturizer*, fragrance, AB has Antibacterial antibacterial in one “deodorizer” preparation
  • 39.
    Preventive Skin Care: Perineal Skin Cleansers Product Key Components Notes Restore Clean & Cleanser, moisturizer, 3-n-1 product Moist emollient Remedy 4-n-1 Cleanser, moisturizer, 3-n-1 product with antimicrobial emollient, benzalkonium antimicrobial agent cleanser chloride Carafoam skin & Cleanser, moisturizer Dispensed as foam, mild perineal cleanser fragrance Peri-wash II Cleanser, benzethonium Antiseptic, fragrance chloride (deodorizer)
  • 40.
    Preventive Skin Careand Contemporary Assessment  Comfort Bath: cleanser & moisturizer  Deodorant Comfort Bath: cleanser, moisturizer & deodorizing agent (Exopheryl™)
  • 41.
    Preventive Skin Care  Typical Protocol – Routine daily cleansing for everyone – Cleanse & moisturize with each major incontinent episode – Apply moisture barrier for significant UI, fecal or double incontinence – Comfort Shield: cleanser, moisturizer, 3% dimethicone skin protectant
  • 42.
    Risk Factors for Pressure Ulcer Development “…The odds of having a pressure ulcer were 22 times greater for hospitalized adult patients with fecal incontinence compared to hospitalized patients without fecal incontinence…and 37.5 times greater in patients who had both impaired mobility and fecal incontinence” JoAnn Maklebust, MSN, RN, CS, NP and Morris A. Magnan, MSN, RN, “Risk Factors Associated with Having a Pressure Ulcer: A Secondary Data Analysis”, Advances in Wound Care, November 1994
  • 43.
    Facts About PressureUlcers  80% of pressure ulcers in hospital are Stage I or Stage II.1  Almost half of all pressure ulcers form on the sacrum (36.9%) and ischium (8.0%).2  A healthcare facility will spend between $400K and $700K annually on pressure ulcer treatment.3  JACHO lists prevention of health care associated pressure ulcers as a patient safety goal.4 1. Whittington KT, Briones R, “National Prevalence and Incidence Study: 6-Year Sequential Acute Care Data,” Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004 Nov/Dec;17(9):490-4. 2. Amlung SR, Miller WL, Bosley LM, Adv. Skin Wound Care. 2001 Nov/Dec; 14(6): 297-301. 3. Robinson, C; Gioekner, M; Bush, S; Copas, J; et al. Determining the efficacy of a pressure ulcer prevention program by collecting prevalence and incidence data: a unit-based effort. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003. May: 49(5):44-6. 48-51. 4. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/07_ltc_npsgs.htm
  • 44.
    Clever et al.- Pressure Ulcer Study “Evaluating the Efficacy of a Uniquely Delivered Skin Protectant and Its Effect on the Formation of Sacral/Buttock Pressure Ulcers”* Average Monthly Incidence of Sacral/Buttock Pressure Ulcers Old standard of care vs. 4.7% using Comfort Shield® as preventative in new Reduction in Incidence standard of care Of sacral/buttock pressure 0.5% ulcers Old Standard of Care New Standard of Care 7/00 – 3/01 5/01 – 7/01 2/02 – 4/02 *Comfort Shield® was used on all incontinent patients and was the only variable changed from the control period. Clever K, Smith G, Bowser C, Monroe K Long-Term Care Unit, Fulton County Medical Center, McConnellsburg, PA, Ostomy/Wound Management. Dec 2002;48(12):60-7.
  • 45.
    “The Development ofCost-Effective Quality Care for the Patient with Incontinence”  Group A = Cleansing spray, washcloths, skin barrier (multi- step process and the current practice).  Group B = Shield Barrier Cloths.  Group C = Disposable washcloth without dimethicone. Results: • Group A = $6.13 per patient per day; 10% skin breakdown. • Group B = $5.40 per patient per day; 8% skin breakdown. • Group C = Discontinued in week 4 due to 29% skin breakdown. • 2003 72 consults due to IAD and 2004 10 consults due to IAD. http://www.sageproducts.com/education/shSymposiaPres.asp Dieter L, Drolshagen C, Blum K, Cost-effective, quality care for the patient with incontinence. Research Poster Abstract presented at WOCN , Minneapolis, MN June 2006
  • 46.
    “Developing a ComprehensiveFecal Incontinence Management Program… (for IAD)”  Program, guidelines and algorithm for clinical decision making to include: Protection, Treatment and Containment devices.  33% of hospitalized patients have fecal incontinence.  Fecal Incontinence increases PU risk 22 times and 30% if immobile.  Shield Barrier cloths for prevention of IAD; Xenaderm for Treatment of IAD and guidelines for external and internal fecal containment devices. http://www.sageproducts.com/education/shSymposiaPres.asp Gray DP, Developing a comprehensive fecal incontinence management program. Practice Innovation Poster Abstract presented at WOCN, Minneapolis, MN June 2006.
  • 48.
    Treat Underlying Incontinence  Consider Diversion of Stool When Indicated  Anal Pouch – Synthetic, adhesive skin barrier attached to pouch  Bowel Management System – Zassi BMS or Flexiseal  Nasal Trumpet – Off label use
  • 49.
    Treat Underlying Incontinence  Temporary Diversion for UI: Indwelling Catheter – Indications  UI complicated by urinary retention, obstruction & only when CIC not feasible  Stage 3-4 PU for transient diversion only – Selection criteria  Siliconeor Lubricath  Smaller French size
  • 50.
    Sluser Study –Consistent Treatment
  • 51.
    Sluser Study –Consistent Treatment
  • 52.
    Sluser Study –Consistent Treatment
  • 53.
    IAD: Treatment  Goals – Establish or continue cleansing/ moisturization/ skin barrier program – Restore epidermal integrity – Minimize exposure to irritants (Manage UI or Fecal incontinence) – Treat secondary cutaneous infections – Create environment for wound healing
  • 54.
    IAD: Treatment  Inert Skin Barriers – Deflect drainage and provides moisture barrier  Most common contain – Petrolatum – Dimethicone – Zinc oxide
  • 55.
    IAD: Treatment  Inert moisture barriers – No evidence base could be identified supporting efficacy for existing IAD – Ample anecdotal evidence supports role in mild to moderate cases in outpatient/ home setting – Disadvantages include removal (zinc oxide in particular)
  • 56.
    IAD: Treatment  Topical Dressings – Hydrocolloids – Thin film dressings  Act as barrier to urine & stool  Promote moist environment for wound healing  Can be combined with topical treatments
  • 57.
    IAD: Treatment  Topical Dressings – Maintaining adherence significant challenge – Skin surfaces complex – Borders often roll when ointments or moisturizing products have been applied – Undermining of urine or stool may occur
  • 58.
    IAD: Treatment  BCT agents  BCT Ointment (Xenaderm) – Balsam Peru, Castor Oil, Trypsin in ointment base – Applied to dermatitis twice daily or with major cleansing  BCT gel (Optase)  NOTE: FDA has ruled out further reimbursement pending documentation of efficacy
  • 59.
    IAD Treatment: Secondary Complications  Candidiasis – Topical antifungals are effective for the treatment of cutaneous infections – Effective agents include the polyene antibiotics, azoles and the allylamines1 – Resistance to antifungals is emerging, careful monitoring of research literature is essential 1. Evans & Gray, JWOCN, 30(1), 2003
  • 60.
    IAD and IHIas it relates to Sage  Facilities need to follow the Six Elements of Pressure Ulcer Prevention (from IHI) – Asssess the skin upon admission – Reassess the skin daily – Inspect the skin daily – Manage moisture – Optimize nutrition and hydration – Minimize pressure
  • 61.
    Summary: Manage Moisture:Keep the Patient Dry and Moisturize Skin  Provide supplies at the bedside of each at-risk patient who is incontinent. This provides the staff with the supplies that they need to immediately clean, dry, and protect the patient’s skin after each episode of incontinence.  Provide under-pads that pull the moisture away from the skin, and limit the use of disposable briefs or containment garments if at all possible.  Provide pre-moistened, disposable barrier wipes to help cleanse, moisturize, deodorize, and protect patients from perineal dermatitis due to incontinence. http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/