This document compares the performance of two IPv4-IPv6 transition mechanisms: BD-SIIT and DSTM. It implements both mechanisms in a simulation to evaluate metrics like throughput, end-to-end delay, and round-trip time. The simulation results show that DSTM performs better than BD-SIIT for large IPv6 packets, with lower delay, higher throughput, and shorter round-trip times. The document also provides background on IPv6 and describes the operation of the two transition mechanisms.

1. An Innovative Simulation, Comparison Methodology & Framework for evaluating the Performance evaluation of a Novel IPv4 -IPv6 Transition Mechanisms : BD-SIIT vs DSTM. Dr.Manjaiah.D.H. Chairman and Professor, Dept of CS, Mangalagangotri, Mangalore University, Mangalore-31739 Hanumanthappa.J., Aravinda.C.V. B.E., M.Tech.,(Ph.D) , M.Sc.,M.Phil.,M.Tech.,(Ph.D)., Asst.Professor,DOS in CS,UOM, Research Scholar, Manasagangotri, Mangalagangotri, Mysore. Mangalore University, Mangalore.

2. This paper clearly specifies comparative and behavior analysis carried out on the two major IPv6 interoperation mechanisms: BD-SIIT and DSTM for the high level compatibility smooth transition, and interoperation between IPv4 and IPv6. This paper proposes the performance analysis of the difference between the BD-SIIT and DSTM. We Implement the BD-SIIT and DSTM in order to Study their behavior using various evaluation metrics such as Throughput,End-to-End delay(EED),RTT. The Simulation results of our experiment shows that DSTM RTT,EED, and Throughput performance metrics are better than BD-SIIT when we are using Large size IPv6 packet . ABSTRACT ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

8. IPv6 Header Format Traffic Class Flow Label Vers Payload Length Next Header Hop Limit Source Address Destination Address 0 4 12 16 24 31

11. Fig.2.Translation of IPv6 to IPv4 Header .

15. DSTM ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

16. Performance evaluation metrics and Simulation parameters of BD-SIIT and DSTM. In this Paper we have calculated three performance evaluation metrics. 1.End to End delay 2.Throughput 3.Round trip time(RTT) N rec 1.Mean End to End delay= ∑ i=1 EEDi/Nrec where EEDi = Tdi- Tsi where EEDi is the end to end delay of ith packet. Tsi is the Source packet i created and Tdi is the Destination packet which is created at Destination. Nrec is the total number of packets received at Dest host and Mean EED is the mean value of each communication session . ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

17. The mean throughput for a sequence of packets of specific size is calculated by using equations 1 and 2. MeanThr = Σ N j =1 Thrj /N -------------(1) where Thr=Packetsreceived(Pr)/Packets generated(Pg)*100%.--------------(2) Where Thrj is the value of the throughput when the packet j is received at intermediate device like DSTM gateway,BD-SIIT Gateway,v4/v6 Router and N is the number of received packets at intermediate device,Pr is the no of packets received at intermediate device and Pg is the number of packets created by source host. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

18. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7. Simulation Parameters Value 1.Buffer Size 500 Packets 2. Propogation Delay 10ms 3.payload size 200 Bytes 4.Very traffic Load 6~240 Nodes. 5.Queue Management Scheme Drop tail.

19. Conclusions . ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

20. References References [1].Hanumanthappa.J.,Manjaiah.D.H.,Vinayak.B.Joshi.,” A Study on IPv6 in IPv4 Static Tunneling threat issues in 4G Networks using OOAD Class and Instance Diagrams” ,Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Science,Communication and Information Technology,(CSCIT2010)organized by Dept of CS and Information Technology,Yeshwanth Mahavidyalaya,Nanded,Maharastra,INDIA, January 09-11,2010,[Paper code CSCIT-152][CSCITOP113]. [2].Hanumanthappa.J.,Manjaiah.D.H.,Vinayak.B.Joshi.,” An IPv4-to-IPv6 threat reviews with dual stack transition mechanism considerations a transitional threat model in 4G Wireless networks ”Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Science, Communication and Information Technology,(CSCIT2010)organized by Dept of CS and Information Technology,Yeshwanth Mahavidyalaya,Nanded,Maharastra,INDIA,January 09-11,2010,[Paper code CSCIT-157] [CSCITOP115]. [3].Hanumanthappa.J.,Manjaiah.D.H.,Vinayak.B.Joshi.,” Implementation,Comparative and Performance Analysis of IPv6 over IPv4 QoS metrics in 4G Networks: Single-source-destination paths Delay, Packet Loss Performance and Tunnel Discovery Mechanisms", Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Science and Applications(ICISA-2010)organized by Dept. of Master of Computer Applications,Panimalar Engineering College,Chennai-600 123,Tamilnadu,India.,February-06-2010,[Paper code ICISA-293(with serial no-101)]. [4].Hanumanthappa.J.,Manjaiah.D.H,Vinayak.B.Joshi ,”High Performance evaluation of Multimedia Video Streaming over IP networks” ,Proceedings of the National conference on Computing communications and Information systems(NCCCIS-2010)organized by Department of Information Technology Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology,Kuniamuthur,Coimbatore-641008,INDIA,February-12-13,2010,[Paper id NCCCIS-MM-03],pp-88-92. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

21. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

22. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7.

23. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7. July 27-28 ICEMC2-2010,Kuppam,AP,INDIA. Any Questions ?

24. ICIIC2010,Aug-5,6,7. July 27-28 ICEMC2-2010,Kuppam,AP,INDIA.