Major Report on ADIAN

Simulation of ADIAN
(A Distributed Intelligent Ad-hoc Network)
Enrollment No. - 9911103496
Enrollment No. - 9911103547
Name of Student - Nitin Parashar
Name of Student - Shalabh Mittal
Name of supervisor(s) - Dr. Krishna Asawa
June – 2015
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Degree of
Bachelor of Technology
In
Computer Science Engineering
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE ENGINEERING & INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY
JAYPEE INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NOIDA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter No. Topics Page No.
I Declaration i
II Certificate ii
III Acknowledgement iii
IV Summary iv
V List of Tables v
VI List of Figures v
VII List of Symbols and Acronyms Vi
Chapter-1 Introduction
1.1 General Introduction 1
1.2 Problem Statement 2
1.3 Work Division 2
1.4 Tabular Comparison of Existing Approaches 3
Chapter-2 Background Study
2.1 List of all sources
2.2 Some Relevant Research Papers
2.3 Integrated Summary of the literature studied
2.4 Empirical Study
4
4-6
7
8-9
Chapter-3 Implementation and Testing
3.1 Requirements Specification 10
3.2 Functional and Non-Functional Requirements 10
3.3 Overall architecture with component description and
dependency details
11
3.4 Data Structures and Algorithms / Protocols 13
3.5 Testing 15
3.6 Risk Analysis and Mitigation Plan 17
Chapter-4 Conclusion and Future Work
4.1 Conclusion 19
4.2 Future Work 19
Appendix A. Gantt Chart
B. References
20
21

(I)
DECLARATION
We hereby declare that this submission is our own work and that, to the best of our knowledge
and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material
which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other
institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgment has been made in the text.
Place: JIIT-128, Noida Signature:
Date: 03/06/2015 Name: Nitin Parashar
Enrollment No: 9911103496
Signature:
Name: Shalabh Mittal
Enrollment No: 9911103547

(II)
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the work titled “Simulation of ADIAN (A Distributed Intelligent Ad-hoc
Network)” submitted by “Nitin Parashar and Shalabh Mittal” in partial fulfillment for the
award of degree of B. Tech of Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University, Noida has
been carried out under my supervision. This work has not been submitted partially or wholly to
any other University or Institute for the award of this or any other degree or diploma.
Signature of Supervisor: …………………….
Name of Supervisor: Dr. Krishna Asawa
Designation: Associate Professor, Department CSE/IT, Noida
Date: 03/06/2015

(III)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The completion of any project work depends upon the cooperation, coordination and combined
effects of several resources of knowledge, energy and time. Therefore we approach this important
matter of acknowledgement through these lines trying our best to give full credits where it deserves.
We are extremely grateful to our supervisor Dr. Krishna Asawa for her expert guidance, constant
encouragement, valuable suggestions, constructive criticism and sustained interest in the project that
tremendously enhanced our perseverance towards our major project work.
Name of Student : Nitin Parashar, Shalabh Mittal
Enrollment Number : 9911103496, 9911103547
Date : 03 June 2015

(IV)
Summary
Wireless networks provide connection flexibility between users in different places. Moreover,
the network can be extended to any place or building without the need for a wired
connection. In this project, we are implementing an ad-hoc network protocol named ADIAN (A
distributed intelligent ad-hoc network). This protocol is different from present widely used ad-
hoc network protocols. It takes into account more information about the neighbor nodes which
saves more power and energy and also provides effective transmission. The protocol is being
simulated on Network Simulator 2 (NS2).

(V)
List of Tables
Table Number Description Page Number
Table 1 Comparison of existing approaches 3
Table 2 Comparison of different versions of 802.11 9
Table 3 Belief Table 14
Table 4 Testing 15
Table 5 Testing Components 16
Table 6 Test Cases 16
Table 7 Risk Analysis 17
Table 8 Impact 17
Table 9 Mitigation Plan 18
(VI)
List of Figures
Figure No. Description Page no.
Fig1 Existing protocols of ad-hoc networks 7
Fig2 Sequence Diagram 12
Fig3 Control Flow Diagram 13

8
(VII)
List of Symbols and Acronyms
Acronym Meaning
AODV Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector
DSDV Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing
OLSR Optimized Link State Routing Protocol
DSR Dynamic Source Routing
NS2 Network Simulator 2
MANET Mobile Ad-hoc network
ADIAN A Distributed Intelligent Ad-hoc Network
DAI Distributed Artificial Intelligent

9
1 Introduction
1.1 General Introduction
The wireless communication revolution is bringing fundamental changes to data networking,
telecommunication, and is making integrated networks a reality. By freeing the user from the
cord, personal communications networks, wireless LAN's, mobile radio networks and cellular
systems, harbor the promise of fully distributed mobile computing and communications, anytime,
anywhere.
Focusing on the networking and user aspects of the field, Wireless Networks provides a global
forum for archival value contributions documenting these fast growing areas of interest. Wireless
ad hoc network is a decentralized type of wireless network. The network is ad hoc because it does
not rely on a pre-existing infrastructure, such as routers in wired networks or access points in
managed (infrastructure) wireless networks. Instead, each node participates in routing by
forwarding data for other nodes, so the determination of which nodes forward data is made
dynamically on the basis of network connectivity. In addition to the classic routing, ad hoc
networks can use flooding for forwarding data.
Wireless mobile ad hoc networks are self-configuring, dynamic networks in which nodes are free
to move. Wireless networks eliminate the complexities of infrastructure setup and administration,
enabling devices to create and join networks "on the fly"-anywhere, anytime, for virtually any
application.
Wireless networks provide connection flexibility between users in different places. Moreover, the
network can be extended to any place or building without the need for a wired connection. In this
project, we simulate the wireless ad-hoc network protocol ADIAN using Network Simulator 2.

10
1.2 Problem Statement
Many different routing protocols have been proposed in the past decade based on different
assumptions and intuitions. Since the routing protocol is one of the determinant factors of the
performance of ad hoc networks, the research that compares different protocols in a realistic setting
is necessary and valuable.
For that we study the existing widely protocols and then we implement ADIAN. After comparison
between existing protocols, we try to implement a new protocol for ad-hoc networks based on
distributed intelligence.
1.3 Work Division
This project is being made by Shalabh Mittal and Nitin Parashar. The division of work is as
follows:
1. Nitin Parashar - DSDV protocol and creating the installation files of the protocol i.e. the C++
and header files to implement ADIAN
2. Shalabh Mittal – AODV, DSR protocol and creation of tcl script files to link it with the protocol
(ADIAN).

11
1.4 Tabular comparison of existing approaches
Table1: Comparison of Existing Approaches

12
2 Background Study
2.1 List of all sources
 Wikipedia
 IEEE Xplore Digital Library
 Acm Digital Library
 Springer Journals etc
2.2 Some Relevant Research Papers
Paper1
Title of paper A Performance Comparison of the Ad hoc
network protocols
Authors Qian Feng, Zhongmin Cai, Jin Yang, Xunchao Hu
Year of Publication 2009
Publishing details 2009 Second International Workshop on Computer Science and
Engineering
Summary In this paper, the performance of the four different ad hoc routing
protocols is compared and analyzed in NS2. The result concluded
that the average throughputs of AODV and DSR are higher,
compared with OLSR and DSDV. On the other hand, the average
delay times of the table- driven protocols are lower and the
average jitters of DSDV and OLSR are smaller and more stable.
As the scale of the network grows, the number of packets
generated in the network becomes much greater for OLSR and
DSDV, which leads to a reduction of throughput and stability.
Taking into account of all the factors, it could be concluded that in
the relatively small and stable wireless network or in the situation
where there are strict requirements on the time, DSDV and OLSR
are more appropriate.
Web link http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&a
rnumber=5403292

13
Paper2
Title of paper Multicast routing with AODV Routing
protocol
Authors Aki Anttila
Publishing details IEEE Journal 2006
Summary This paper discusses about multicast AODV (MAODV). MAODV is
developed to be used in networks that contains number of mobile
nodes that move around and therefore network topology changes
continuously. It is based on bi-directional shared trees that are created
and terminated as the multicast receivers join and leave the multicast
groups. MAODV contains routing tables for multicast routes and two
messages (MACT, GRPH) in addition to AODV’s, RREQ and RREP.
This paper also discusses about multicast tree creation and passing of
messages in MAODV. Also discusses about other approaches for
multicast routing in Ad-hoc networks.
rnumber=05711719
Paper3
Title of paper ADIAN: A Distributed Intelligent Ad-Hoc Network
Authors Saeed Shahbazi, Gholamreza Ghassem-Sani,
Mohammad Ghanbari and Mehdi Dehghan
Publishing details ICDCN 2006, LNSC4308, pp. 27-39, 2006
Summary In this paper, a new routing protocol for mobile ad-hoc networks
(ADIAN) which is based on the concepts of Distributed Artificial
Intelligence (DAI). In this protocol, each node as an independent
and autonomous agent that collaborates the other agents of the
system. There are some other protocols also that implement DAI for
example ARAMA and ANT-AODV.
ADIAN implements four tables: State, Routing, Neighborhood and
Belief table. Each agent in ADIAN learns the status of other agents
through communications. Whenever a new agent enters into the
system it will construct its own tables and other agents tables are
also updated.
rnumber=06884319

14
Paper4
Title of paper Research on Routing Protocols in Ad Hoc Networks
Authors Dou Niu, Yan Zhang, Yanjuan Zhao, Mei
Yang
Publishing details International Symposium on Computer Science and
Computational Technology
Summary Wireless Ad Hoc network is a special structure of the wireless
communication network, whose communication relies on their
cooperation among the nodes and achieve it in the manner of
wireless multi-hop. Therefore, this kind of network does not rely on
any fixed infrastructure, and has the properties of self organizing
and self-managing. This special network mode makes ad hoc
network not only apply to military communications, but also
apply to civilian communication such as environmental
monitoring, disaster-site temporary communications and so on.
At the same time, Ad Hoc network has properties of mobile
communications and computer networks so it can be seen as a
special type of mobile computer communications networks. In this
paper, first, some basic knowledge about the Ad Hoc networks was
given, including the concept of Ad Hoc networks, characteristics,
and then research a number of classic routing protocols of Ad Hoc
Network.
rnumber=1105382

15
2.3 Integrated Summary of Literature Studied:
At, first we study the existing protocols of ad-hoc networks. Some of them are:
Figure: 1 Existing protocols of ad-hoc networks
 DSDV (Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing)
 OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing Protocol)
 DSR (Dynamic Source Routing)
 AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector)
Taking into account of routing protocol performance issues in practical we will use three
metrics to measure the performance of routing protocols.
End-to-end data throughput analyzes the total number of bytes of the packets delivered
successfully per unit time, which can be formulated as
tpi(t)= ϕ.n(t)
t
in which tpi(t) is the data throughput at node I during the time t, ϕ is the average size of a
package and ni(t) is total number of packets that the node I sent and received during a period of
t seconds.
End-to-end time delay measures the time required to deliver a package x from node i to the
destination, which is computed from
Di(x)= Td
r
(x)-Ti
s
(x)

16
Td
r
(x) is the time when the destination receives packet x from node i, Ti
s
(x) is the time when
node i sends the packet x, and Di(x) is end-to-end time delay of packet x. End-to-end time
delay is to evaluate the efficiency of transferring a packet. The less it is, the higher the
efficiency of this protocol is.
PDV (Packet Delay Variation), also known as jitter, is the difference in end-to-end delay
between selected packets in a flow with the lost packets being ignored. PDV is known as one
of important service factors in assessment of ad hoc network performance. The jitter vi(t) of
node i at time t can be computed as
vi(t)= Di(xj)- Di(xk)
seqn(xj)-seqn(xk)
in which seqn(xk) is the sequence number of packet k. PDV is used to measure the variability
of the packet latency across a network over time. If the value of this metric is small, then the
performance of the network is stable.
Then we study about their performance and see what things we can do in our implementation.
Unicasting, Multicasting and Broadcasting concept are studied in detail along with their use in
different protocols. Multicast routing in AODV which implements tree concepts for transferring
of data packets. It uses group multicasting.
ADIAN is the protocol we are implementing it takes into account some tables for routing i.e.
belief table, neighbour table, routing table and state table and routing is done on this information
after which data packet transfer takes place.

17
2.4 Empirical Study
2.4.1 Summary of Field Survey
802.11 Family
It is set of Media Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications for
implementing Wireless local area network (WLAN) computer communication in various
frequency bands.
Protocols of 802.11 Family
802.11-1997 (802.11 legacy)
802.11a
802.11b
802.11g
802.11-2007
802.11n
802.11-2012
802.11ac
802.11ad
802.11af
802.11ah
802.11ai
802.11aj
802.11aq
802.11ax
Table2: Comparison of different versions of 802.11

18
2.4.2 Tool Survey
Network Simulator 2(NS2)
• Developed by UC Berkeley
• Popular simulator in scientific environment
• Other popular network simulators
 Glomosim: UCLA, CMU; ParseC, Mobile Simulation mostly
 OPNET: commercial software, graphical interface, not free;
 Others: commercial ones, not free, e.g. IBM TPNS.
NS2 Goals
• To support networking research and education
 Protocol design, traffic studies, etc.
 Protocol comparison;
 New architecture designs are also supported.
• To provide collaborative environment
 Freely distributed, open source;
 Increase confidence in result
Protocols/Models supported by NS2
• Wired Networking
 Routing: Unicast, Multicast, and Hierarchical Routing, etc.
 Transportation: TCP, UDP, others;
 Traffic sources: web, ftp, telnet, cbr, etc.
 Queuing disciplines: drop-tail, RED, etc.
 QoS: IntServ and Diffserv Wireless Networking
Two Languages: C++, OTcl
OTcl: short for MIT Object Tcl,
an extension to Tcl/Tk for object-oriented programming.
 Used to build the network structure and topology
 Easily to configure your network parameters;
 Not enough for research schemes and protocol architecture adaption.

19
3. Implementation and Testing
3.1 Requirements Specifications
Hardware Requirements
 Hard disk: 10 GB minimum
 Ram: 1GB minimum
Software Requirements
 System Type: 64-bit operating system,x-64 based processor
 OS Installed: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 or Ubuntu
 Network Simulator 2 (NS2) installed
3.2 Functional Requirements and Non Functional Requirements
Functional Requirements
• It should simulate the wireless routing protocols using ns2.
• It should calculate the packet delivery ratio of corresponding nodes.
• It should calculate end to end delay of every node.
• It should select that particular node for transmission which is maximum efficient.
Non-Functional Requirements
• Portability: Since OS is installed in pen drive. So it can run on any system.
• Security: The packet is transmitted to the designated node only. Thus preventing data leak
• Reliability: The system is highly reliable.
• Accessibility: It can be easily accessible i.e. click & run.
• Efficiency: Resource consumption for given load is quite low.
• Fault tolerance: Our system is not fault tolerant due to insufficient hardware.
• Robustness: Our system is not capable to cope with errors during execution.
• Scalability: Our project is scalable i.e. we can add more resources to our project
without disturbing the current scenario.

20
3.3 Overall Architecture with Component Description and Dependency Details
3.3.1 Sequence Diagram
Fig: 2 Sequence Diagram
The above diagram describes about how we run different protocols on our system and compare
different protocols on the basis of parameters.

21
3.3.2 Control Flow Diagram
Fig: 3 Control Flow Diagram
The above diagram describes our project from the very initial stage:
 First step is to install NS2 on Linux.
 Second is to implement the different routing protocols, on smaller number of nodes,
which are to be compared on the basis of different parameters.
 Now, we run the different protocols for more number of nodes than previous simulation
and compare them again. This step will be repeated one more time. Each time comparing
the results on the basis of performance parameters.

22
3.4 Algorithms / Protocols and Implementation Details
A Distributed Intelligent ad-hoc network (ADIAN)
Each node maintains state, routing, neighborhood and belief tables. “State Table” will contain
latest information about the agent. “Routing Table” maintains destination agents and
appropriate neighbor to reach the packet to desire destination. “Neighborhood Table” contains
list of neighbor. “Belief Table” contains information about every node’s belief degree
(accuracy of information).
Belief Table
Next_hop Destination_add No_of_nodes Total Success Belief
Agent X Agent A N 10 7 70%
Table 3: Belief Table
Belief = (Success/ Total) * 100
Route Discovery
Agents are responsible of delivery of packets from source to destination by finding optimal
root. A node that wants to send / forward data packet will check its neighborhood tables and
belief table to choose the best neighbor to forward the packet. By using the belief factor from
belief table the node will be chosen the one having the better belief factor.
Route Maintenance
Route maintenance is responsible for maintaining routes during transmission. In ADIAN there
is no need to send additional control packet to maintain routes. Data packets in their journey
are used to update the knowledge of visited agents, therefore agents receive up-to-date
information about each other.
Another problem is to prevent routing loops. ADIAN prevents routing loops using a list of
illegal neighbors. If a data packet passes through a node, then it adds the previously visited
nodes to its lists. Agents are not allowed to use the nodes in their illegal list for routing.

23
3.5 Testing
3.5.1 Testing Plan
Type of Test Will it be
Performed?
Explanations Software Component
Requirement Yes Requirement testing is testing the
requirements whether they are
feasible or not. Because a project
depends on a number of factors
like time, resources, budget etc.
Before we start working on a
project it is important to test these
requirements.
Manual work, need
to plan out all the
software
requirements, time
needed to develop,
technology to be
used etc.
Unit Yes Testing by which individual units
of source code are tested to
determine if they are fit for use.
Manual check is
required
Integration Yes Testing wherein individual
components are combined and
tested as a group.
Compiling full part of
the code and testing
it together.
Performance Yes
Testing to evaluate the input
where the best and most
optimal output is Yielded by
the system.
Protocols used
insure this.
Stress Yes Simulating beyond normal
Operational capacity.
Heavy data files.
Compliance Yes It determines, whether we are
implementing and meeting the
defined standards.
Need in testing the
performance metric
Volume Yes
It will be able to simulate the
nodes up to a limit. The protocol ensures
this.
Security Yes
The packet is transmitted to the
designated node only.
prevents data
leakage
Table 4: Testing

24
3.5.2 Component decomposition and type of testing required
S.No. Various components
that require testing
Type of testing
required
Technique for
writing Test cases
1 Protocols
Implemented
Unit, Performance,
Volume, Security
White box
2 Performance Metric
and results
Unit, Performance,
Stress
Black box
3 NS2 tool and results Unit, Performance,
Integration
White box
Table 5: Testing Components
3.5.3 List all test cases
S.No. Input Output Status
1 Activate the NS2 software
and execute the code for
routing protocols.
NS2 works code
executes without
error
Pass
2 Execute routing protocols Desired outputs
accordingly
Pass
3 Comparison Metric Protocols
comparison on
given metric
Fail
Table 6: Test Cases
3.5.4 Limitations
 There might be a better approach than this protocol.
 The networks are simulated for based on certain assumptions and fixed
parameters. The variety of parameters is something that can be looked into.

25
3.6 Risk Analysis and Mitigation Plan
3.6.1 Risk Analysis
Risk
id
Classification Description of risk Risk area Probability
(P)
Impact(I) Re(P
*I)
1 Hardware Incapability of hardware
like RAM, Processor,
Memory etc
Performance,
hardware,
Time
High High 8.1
2 Multitenancy
(Shared
access)
All the users are using
the same physical
architecture
Security Low Low 0.1
3 Security Critical Data at risk Security High Medium 8.1
4 Security Authentication,
authorization, and access
control
User, Project
Scope, Time
High High 8.1
5 Hardware Processor can direct boot
from pen drive
Performance,
Time
Low High 0.9
6 Ownership User the owner of data Security High Low 0.9
7 Environment Ubuntu and ns2 is
necessary for simulation
Performance,
Time
High Medium 8.1
8 Personnel
Related
Incompetent Skills Time High High 8.1
9 Personnel
Related
Irregularity Time Medium High 2.7
Table 7 : Risk Analysis
RATING IMPACT PROBABILITY
HIGH 9 0.9
MEDIUM 3 0.3
LOW 1 0.1
Table 8 : Impact

26
3.6.2 Mitigation Plan
Risk Mitigation Plan
Hardware Hardware related issues can be resolved by
using powerful processors support, Faster
RAMs and Bigger Storage device.
Security Secure connection must be established between
the nodes.
Personnel Related Placements Activities are unavoidable.
Projects related skills need time because no one
hasn’t explored it yet completely. We will try
to avoid irregularity.
Environments Ns2 must be installed on Ubuntu
Table 9 : Mitigation Plan

27
4. Conclusion and Future Work
4.1 Conclusion
Ad-hoc networks are flexible networks and do not have in preinstalled infrastructure. There have
been certain developments in this field till now but due to mobility of nodes routing in ad-hoc
networks is still a challenging issue.
In this project we have implemented ADIAN, routing is performed by DAI methods. This
protocol is robust and has less routing overhead. It is power and energy efficient. Routing is
accurate and cost efficient.
4.2 Future Work
The following features can be incorporated in the future work for the development
of project :
 Try to implement this using multicast technique using tree or graph approach.
 Implement for large number of nodes and analyze their results through simulation.
 Try to implement these techniques using different simulating tools.

28
Appendix
A. Gantt chart
TASK
11-02-
2015
23-03-
2015
24-03-
2015
28-03-
2015
07-04-
2015
10-04-
2015
02-05-
2015
03-05-
2015
Topic
Discussion
with mentor
Topic
Finalization
and
requirement
discussion
Initial proposal
collection of
Data-Set
Progress
reported to
mentor of till
date work
Mid Term
Evaluation
Work on
management
and final
implementation
Final
Evaluation

29
B. References
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ad_hoc_routing_protocols
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11#802.11ac
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZigBee
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_(telecommunication)
6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5403292
7. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=05711719
8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc_Ondemand_Distance_Vector_Routing
9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DestinationSequenced_Distance_Vector_routing C Perkins, E
Belding-Royer, S Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand
10. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11947950_3#page-1
11. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=272250
12. https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?q=dsr+routing+protocol&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&
oi=scholart&sa=X&ei=G0NwVcg4hrG4BKC0gMAM&ved=0CBoQgQMwAA
13. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Source_Routing
14. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4728

Major Report on ADIAN

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Major Report on ADIAN

Similar to Major Report on ADIAN (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Major Report on ADIAN