18. “HIGH SPEED” RAIL HYPERLOOP
ELON PROPOSED THE HYPERLOOP AS AN ATLERNATIVE
TO THE COSTLY CALIFORNIA “HIGH SPEED” RAIL
19. Safer
“HIGH SPEED” RAIL HYPERLOOP
Expensive Slow Faster Lower
cost
More
convenient
Immune to
weather
Resistant to
Earthquakes
Not disruptive
to those along
the route
Sustainably
self-powering
ELON PROPOSED THE HYPERLOOP AS AN ATLERNATIVE
TO THE COSTLY CALIFORNIA “HIGH SPEED” RAIL
23. 0 110 220 330 440 550 660 770 880 990 1100
ENERGY COST PER PASSENGER FOR A JOURNEY BETWEEN LOS
ANGELES AND SAN FRANCISCO FOR VARIOUS MODES OF TRANSPORT
Car (30mpg,2
passenger)
Motorcycle
(50mpg,1 passenger)
Airplabe (2001Transport
Energy DataBook)
Train (2001Transport
EnergyDataBook)
Model S
(2 passengers)
Passenger Hyperloop
(70% occupancy)
Passenger + Vehicle
Hyperloop (70%occupancy)