DRISHYA MOHAN
2011-06-006
INTRODUCTION
• Combination of preservation methods.
• Intelligent combination of hurdles which
secures the microbial safety and stability
as well as the organoleptic and
nutritional quality of food products.
IMPORTANT HURDLES IN FOOD
• High temperature
• Low temperature
• Acidity
• aw
• Redox potential
• preservatives
PHYSICAL HURDLES
• Aseptic packaging, electromagnetic energy ,high
temperatures ,blanching, pasteurization, sterilization,
evaporation, extrusion,
• Ionic radiation, low temperature (chilling freezing),
modified atmospheres, packaging
• Films (including active packaging, edible coatings),
photodynamic inactivation, ultra-high pressures,
• Ultrasonication, ultraviolet radiation.
Physico-chemical hurdles
• Carbon dioxide, ethanol, lactic acid,
lactoperoxidase, low pH, low redox potential,
low water activity.
• Maillard reaction products, organic acids,
oxygen, ozone, phenols, phosphates, salt,
smoking, sodium.
• Nitrite/nitrate, sodium or potassium sulphite,
spices and herbs, surface treatment agents
MICROBIALLY DERIVED
HURDLES
• Antibiotics, bacteriocins, competitive
flora, protective cultures
HURDLES IN FOOD
• More than 60 potential hurdles for foods.
• Which improves stability and quality of food.
• Will influence safety ,quality of food
products.
• Improve the flavor of the products.
• Some hurdles could have a positive or
negative effect on foods.
• Each safe and stable food has a certain
set of hurdles is inherent.
• It is important for preservation of IMF
and high moisture foods.
• Each hurdles aim to eliminate unwanted
microorganisms.
• The microorganisms present (‘at the start’) in
a food should not be able to overcome (‘leap
over’)the hurdles.
• Otherwise the food will spoil or even cause
food poisoning.
• This situation is illustrated by the hurdle
effect
•All the hurdles at the same
intensity.
Hurdles of different intensity
•If only a few micro-organisms are present
(‘at the start’),
a few or low number of hurdles will be
sufficient for the stability of the product.
Too many undesirable micro-organisms are initially
present.
• A food rich in nutrients and vitamins, which could
foster the growth of micro-organisms (called the
booster or trampoline effect).
• Thus the hurdles in such a product must be
enhanced.
Illustrates the behaviour of sub-lethally
damaged organisms in food.
A sequence of hurdles operates in
fermented sausages and probably in
ripened cheeses or fermented vegetables.
BASIC ASPECTS
• Food preservation implies putting
microorganisms in a hostile environment, in
order to inhibit their growth.
• The feasible responses of microorganisms to
this hostile environment determine whether
they may grow or die.
• Food preservation method influence
physiology and behaviour of microorganisms
in food.
• ie,homeostasis,metabaulic exhaustion,stress
reaction.
HOMEOSTASIS
• food preservation is achieved by disturbing
the homeostasis of microorganisms.
• Homeostasis is the tendency to uniformity and
stability in the internal status of organisms.
• If the homeostasis of these microorganisms is
disturbed by preservative factors (hurdles) in
foods,
They will not multiply,remain in lag phase or
even die.
Metabolic exhaustion
• Which cause autosterilization of food.
• Due to autosterilization hurdle-
technology foods,
which are microbiologically stable,
become more safe during storage.
STRESS REACTION
• Some bacteria become more resistant under
stress.
• Generate stress shock protein.
• Multi targetting preservation of food could
be key to avoiding synthesis of stress shock
protein.
MULTITARGET PRESERVATION
• This approach is often more effective than
single-targeting.
• Enables the use of hurdles of lower intensity.
• Less of an effect on product quality.
• A synergistic effect could be achieved if the
hurdles in a food hit, at the same time,
different targets.
ADVANTAGES
• Hurdle technology improves taste and quality of
foods.
• Hurdle technology is used for preserving
cosmetics.
• Products will become more natural.
• Less dependent on preservatives.
• Opportunities to using natural preservatives
in combination with synthetic preservatives.
CASE
STUDY-1
Title : Microbial and sensory stability of
cauliflower for 180 days preserved through
hurdle technology
Jyoti Sinha, Ena Gupta, Prashasti Tripathi
and Ramesh Chandra
OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH
• To develop a suitable technology for blanching
cauliflower to inactivate the catalase and peroxidise
enzyme.
• To develop a suitable hurdle techonology for
blanched cauliflower.
• To study the effect of hurdle technology on
microbial content of preserved cauliflower.
• To study the effect of hurdle technology on sensory
properties of preserved cauliflower
Materials and Methods
• Materials used in preservation :Cauliflower cords.
• Chemicals used in blanching and preservation:
Food grade (potassium metabisulphate, sodium
benzoate and citric acid) chemicals were used.
• Polyethylene pouches:Food grade pouches were used
Method of preservation
• First cauliflower head (white curds) after
sorting, were cut into 5×3×3 cm pieces
with sharp edged stainless steel knife,
then thoroughly washed in tap water
and distilled water.
Blanched at :
Temperature Time
B1 98°C 30 sec
B2 98°C 60 sec
B3 99°C 30 sec
B4 99°C 60 sec
B5 100°C 30 sec
B6 100°C 60 sec
• Dipping into 0.25% potassium metabisulphite
for 10 minutes.
• Among above 6 (B1 to B6)
treatments,successful blanching treatment
was selected.
Blanched cauliflower were steeped into different
concentrations and combinations of preservatives.
Salt Potassium
metabisulph
ite(ppm)
Sodium
benzoate
(ppm)
Citric
acid(%)
P1 8% 500 100 -
P2 10% 400 200 -
P3 12% 300 300 -
P4 8% 300 300 0.3
P5 10% 400 200 0.2
P6 12% 500 100 0.1
• Steeped cauliflower were further aseptically
packed into food grade polyethylene pouches.
• stored at two different level of temperatures-
T1 (ambient temperature -30 to 37°C)
T2(refrigeration temperatures - 5 to 7°C)
• for different time intervals i.e. 0, 30, 60, 90,
120, 150 and 180 days respectively.
• All combinations of treatments were
analyzed for their microbial and sensory
properties.
• Data obtained after analysis were
statistically analysed.
Conclusion
• All the hurdles (treatments combination)
were not effective for preservation of
cauliflower till 180 days of storage period.
Only 3 treatments - P4/T1, P4/T2 and P5/T2
were microbial safe.
• Among these 3, only P4/T2 was found best in
sensory evaluation.
CASE STUDY-2
• Title : A New Approach of Hurdle technology
to preserve Mango fruit with the application
of Aloe vera gel and Calcium chloride.
Shweta Chauhan, K.C.Gupta and Mukesh Agrawal
• The present study aim to investigate the
efficacy of natural preservative (Aloe vera gel
coating) and chemical preservative (calcium
chloride spray)separately and in the
combination (hurdle technology).
Materials and Methods
• Sample Collection
• Treatment with calcium chloride and
Aloe vera gel
TREATMENT WITH CALCIUM CHLORIDE AND
ALOEVERA GEL
M1 = 0.0 % Aloe vera gel
M2 = 1.0% Aloe vera gel
M3 = 5.0% Aloe vera gel
M4 = 10% Aloe vera gel
M5 = 1.0% calcium chloride
M6 = 3.0% calcium chloride
M7 = 5.0% calcium chloride
M8 = 7.0% calcium chloride
M9= 5.0% calcium chloride and 5.0% Aloe vera gel
M 10 = control.
ANALYSIS PERFORMED
• Sensory Evaluation
• Microbial analysis
• Organoleptic evaluation
• Total phenolic content (TPC) and Total
suspended solids (TSS)
conclusion
• Better results were noticed
when mango samples were applied with hurdle
technology in combination of chitosan (microbial
product) and calcium chloride (chemical
preservative), Aloe vera gel.
REFERENCES
• 1. Leistner, L., 1992. Food preservation by combined methods. Food Res.
Internat. 25, 151–158
• 2. Leistner, L., 1994b. Food Design by Hurdle Technology and HACCP,
Printed and distributed by the Adalbert-Raps-Foundation, Kulmbach,
Germany.
• 3. Haussinger, D. (Ed.), 1988. pH Homeostasis: Mechanisms and Control,
Academic Press,London.
• .4. Jyoti Sinha, Ena Gupta, Prashasti Tripathi and Ramesh Chandra .2013.
Microbial and Sensory Stability of Cauliflower for 180 Days Preserved. J
Food Process Technology.Through Hurdle Technology. J Food Sci
Technol , 4:9.
• 5. Shweta Chauhan, K.C. Gupta, Mukesh Agrawal ,2014, A New Approach
of Hurdle technology to preserve Mango fruit with the application of Aloe
vera gel and Calcium chloride , Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci 3(3): 706-711
.
•
THANK YOU

hurdle technology

  • 2.
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION • Combination ofpreservation methods. • Intelligent combination of hurdles which secures the microbial safety and stability as well as the organoleptic and nutritional quality of food products.
  • 4.
    IMPORTANT HURDLES INFOOD • High temperature • Low temperature • Acidity • aw • Redox potential • preservatives
  • 5.
    PHYSICAL HURDLES • Asepticpackaging, electromagnetic energy ,high temperatures ,blanching, pasteurization, sterilization, evaporation, extrusion, • Ionic radiation, low temperature (chilling freezing), modified atmospheres, packaging • Films (including active packaging, edible coatings), photodynamic inactivation, ultra-high pressures, • Ultrasonication, ultraviolet radiation.
  • 6.
    Physico-chemical hurdles • Carbondioxide, ethanol, lactic acid, lactoperoxidase, low pH, low redox potential, low water activity. • Maillard reaction products, organic acids, oxygen, ozone, phenols, phosphates, salt, smoking, sodium. • Nitrite/nitrate, sodium or potassium sulphite, spices and herbs, surface treatment agents
  • 7.
    MICROBIALLY DERIVED HURDLES • Antibiotics,bacteriocins, competitive flora, protective cultures
  • 8.
    HURDLES IN FOOD •More than 60 potential hurdles for foods. • Which improves stability and quality of food. • Will influence safety ,quality of food products. • Improve the flavor of the products.
  • 9.
    • Some hurdlescould have a positive or negative effect on foods. • Each safe and stable food has a certain set of hurdles is inherent. • It is important for preservation of IMF and high moisture foods.
  • 11.
    • Each hurdlesaim to eliminate unwanted microorganisms. • The microorganisms present (‘at the start’) in a food should not be able to overcome (‘leap over’)the hurdles. • Otherwise the food will spoil or even cause food poisoning. • This situation is illustrated by the hurdle effect
  • 13.
    •All the hurdlesat the same intensity.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    •If only afew micro-organisms are present (‘at the start’), a few or low number of hurdles will be sufficient for the stability of the product.
  • 16.
    Too many undesirablemicro-organisms are initially present.
  • 17.
    • A foodrich in nutrients and vitamins, which could foster the growth of micro-organisms (called the booster or trampoline effect). • Thus the hurdles in such a product must be enhanced.
  • 18.
    Illustrates the behaviourof sub-lethally damaged organisms in food.
  • 20.
    A sequence ofhurdles operates in fermented sausages and probably in ripened cheeses or fermented vegetables.
  • 21.
    BASIC ASPECTS • Foodpreservation implies putting microorganisms in a hostile environment, in order to inhibit their growth. • The feasible responses of microorganisms to this hostile environment determine whether they may grow or die.
  • 22.
    • Food preservationmethod influence physiology and behaviour of microorganisms in food. • ie,homeostasis,metabaulic exhaustion,stress reaction.
  • 23.
    HOMEOSTASIS • food preservationis achieved by disturbing the homeostasis of microorganisms. • Homeostasis is the tendency to uniformity and stability in the internal status of organisms.
  • 24.
    • If thehomeostasis of these microorganisms is disturbed by preservative factors (hurdles) in foods, They will not multiply,remain in lag phase or even die.
  • 25.
    Metabolic exhaustion • Whichcause autosterilization of food. • Due to autosterilization hurdle- technology foods, which are microbiologically stable, become more safe during storage.
  • 26.
    STRESS REACTION • Somebacteria become more resistant under stress. • Generate stress shock protein. • Multi targetting preservation of food could be key to avoiding synthesis of stress shock protein.
  • 27.
    MULTITARGET PRESERVATION • Thisapproach is often more effective than single-targeting. • Enables the use of hurdles of lower intensity. • Less of an effect on product quality. • A synergistic effect could be achieved if the hurdles in a food hit, at the same time, different targets.
  • 28.
    ADVANTAGES • Hurdle technologyimproves taste and quality of foods. • Hurdle technology is used for preserving cosmetics.
  • 29.
    • Products willbecome more natural. • Less dependent on preservatives. • Opportunities to using natural preservatives in combination with synthetic preservatives.
  • 30.
    CASE STUDY-1 Title : Microbialand sensory stability of cauliflower for 180 days preserved through hurdle technology Jyoti Sinha, Ena Gupta, Prashasti Tripathi and Ramesh Chandra
  • 31.
    OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH •To develop a suitable technology for blanching cauliflower to inactivate the catalase and peroxidise enzyme. • To develop a suitable hurdle techonology for blanched cauliflower. • To study the effect of hurdle technology on microbial content of preserved cauliflower. • To study the effect of hurdle technology on sensory properties of preserved cauliflower
  • 32.
    Materials and Methods •Materials used in preservation :Cauliflower cords. • Chemicals used in blanching and preservation: Food grade (potassium metabisulphate, sodium benzoate and citric acid) chemicals were used. • Polyethylene pouches:Food grade pouches were used
  • 33.
    Method of preservation •First cauliflower head (white curds) after sorting, were cut into 5×3×3 cm pieces with sharp edged stainless steel knife, then thoroughly washed in tap water and distilled water.
  • 34.
    Blanched at : TemperatureTime B1 98°C 30 sec B2 98°C 60 sec B3 99°C 30 sec B4 99°C 60 sec B5 100°C 30 sec B6 100°C 60 sec
  • 35.
    • Dipping into0.25% potassium metabisulphite for 10 minutes. • Among above 6 (B1 to B6) treatments,successful blanching treatment was selected.
  • 36.
    Blanched cauliflower weresteeped into different concentrations and combinations of preservatives. Salt Potassium metabisulph ite(ppm) Sodium benzoate (ppm) Citric acid(%) P1 8% 500 100 - P2 10% 400 200 - P3 12% 300 300 - P4 8% 300 300 0.3 P5 10% 400 200 0.2 P6 12% 500 100 0.1
  • 37.
    • Steeped cauliflowerwere further aseptically packed into food grade polyethylene pouches. • stored at two different level of temperatures- T1 (ambient temperature -30 to 37°C) T2(refrigeration temperatures - 5 to 7°C) • for different time intervals i.e. 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 days respectively.
  • 38.
    • All combinationsof treatments were analyzed for their microbial and sensory properties. • Data obtained after analysis were statistically analysed.
  • 39.
    Conclusion • All thehurdles (treatments combination) were not effective for preservation of cauliflower till 180 days of storage period. Only 3 treatments - P4/T1, P4/T2 and P5/T2 were microbial safe. • Among these 3, only P4/T2 was found best in sensory evaluation.
  • 40.
    CASE STUDY-2 • Title: A New Approach of Hurdle technology to preserve Mango fruit with the application of Aloe vera gel and Calcium chloride. Shweta Chauhan, K.C.Gupta and Mukesh Agrawal
  • 41.
    • The presentstudy aim to investigate the efficacy of natural preservative (Aloe vera gel coating) and chemical preservative (calcium chloride spray)separately and in the combination (hurdle technology).
  • 42.
    Materials and Methods •Sample Collection • Treatment with calcium chloride and Aloe vera gel
  • 43.
    TREATMENT WITH CALCIUMCHLORIDE AND ALOEVERA GEL M1 = 0.0 % Aloe vera gel M2 = 1.0% Aloe vera gel M3 = 5.0% Aloe vera gel M4 = 10% Aloe vera gel M5 = 1.0% calcium chloride M6 = 3.0% calcium chloride M7 = 5.0% calcium chloride M8 = 7.0% calcium chloride M9= 5.0% calcium chloride and 5.0% Aloe vera gel M 10 = control.
  • 44.
    ANALYSIS PERFORMED • SensoryEvaluation • Microbial analysis • Organoleptic evaluation • Total phenolic content (TPC) and Total suspended solids (TSS)
  • 45.
    conclusion • Better resultswere noticed when mango samples were applied with hurdle technology in combination of chitosan (microbial product) and calcium chloride (chemical preservative), Aloe vera gel.
  • 46.
    REFERENCES • 1. Leistner,L., 1992. Food preservation by combined methods. Food Res. Internat. 25, 151–158 • 2. Leistner, L., 1994b. Food Design by Hurdle Technology and HACCP, Printed and distributed by the Adalbert-Raps-Foundation, Kulmbach, Germany. • 3. Haussinger, D. (Ed.), 1988. pH Homeostasis: Mechanisms and Control, Academic Press,London. • .4. Jyoti Sinha, Ena Gupta, Prashasti Tripathi and Ramesh Chandra .2013. Microbial and Sensory Stability of Cauliflower for 180 Days Preserved. J Food Process Technology.Through Hurdle Technology. J Food Sci Technol , 4:9. • 5. Shweta Chauhan, K.C. Gupta, Mukesh Agrawal ,2014, A New Approach of Hurdle technology to preserve Mango fruit with the application of Aloe vera gel and Calcium chloride , Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci 3(3): 706-711 . •
  • 47.