The document discusses logic and moral dilemmas. It argues that while some see moral dilemmas as resulting from inconsistencies in moral rules that can be resolved by adding exceptions or priorities, moral dilemmas are an inevitable part of real life. A completely consistent moral system is impossible in principle due to the role of values and alternatives in moral statements. Moral dilemmas will always exist given that alternatives can each be rated better or worse in some respects, without an overall ranking.