structural web lectures in higher educational programmes 
impact on quality of teaching and learning 
The Hague University of Applied Sciences 
Academy of Public Management, Law & Safety 
IJsbrand Hoetjes | senior lecturer 
The Hague University of Applied Sciences 
Centre for Research and Development 
Bert Mulder | associate professor 
Martijn Hartog | researcher | m.w.hartog@hhs.nl
introduction 
online learning (e.g. Arbaugh, 2008) 
blended learning (e.g. Buchanan et al., 2010) 
e-learning (e.g. Garrison & Anderson, 2003) 
web lectures (e.g. Gorissen, 2003; 2011) 
several explorations in 2006-2009 
resulting in structural incorporation of web lectures 
web lectures / courses preferred by students 
no decline physical attendance 
used mainly for exam preparations 
increased study success rates 
learning is taking place and time independently
‘University 2.0’ 
The Hague University of Applied Sciences 
25.000+ students 
4 buildings in 3 cities (The Hague, Delft and Zoetermeer) 
43 Bachelor programmes (of which 9 in English) 
21 part-time and 10 dual Bachelor programmes 
7 Master, 28 post-bachelor en 3 A.D. programmes 
Research programme, 2012-2013 
exploring the broad and structural adoption of web lectures 
resulting in structural incorporation of web lectures 
University Development Plan, 2009-2013 
Vision Memorandum Education and ICT, 2010 
Long term plan ICT in Education, 2012
method 
main question: 
smart and sufficient usage of new media and e-learning 
resulting in increasing study success 
300 recorded lectures 
(270 at the Academy of Public Management, Law & Safety) 
40 different lecturers 
5 Academies 
watched over 6000 hours by students 
+ 
New media and e-learning Survey EGPA delegates and participants 2012
technical part exploration 
recording Mediasite of Sonic Foundry 
Video infrastructure Mediamission 
E-learning Cali Author 
------------ 
Distribution & dissemination Blackboard, e-mail etc. 
standard fully equipped recording location with technical supporting staff
results 1/2 
Students 
better understanding course material 
exam preparation purposes 
repetition of the course material 
catching up a missed lecture 
used on different places (home, in transition, University) 
less time explaining theory 
more time deepening course material and professional applicability 
better success rate at the first exam
results 2/2 
Lecturers 
technical simplicity of recording and disseminating 
necessity of preparing a script 
risk of web lecturers replacing other learning material 
awareness on quality of recorded (course) material 
better quality questions and reflection 
more time for interaction 
improved didactic education 
improved internal coordination between courses and academies through 
digital content
encountered challenges 
e-learning should be facilitated structurally and centrally 
lecturers should use scripts 
full potential unclear 
teaching methods expansion and integration 
no technical problems 
no decreased physical attendance
next necessary steps 
developing more knowledge and experiences with best practices 
pragmatic model to a sustainable central e-learning system 
attractive blended learning needs to be pursued 
establishing, constructing and managing collections of re-usable digital 
knowledge is determinant
consequences digitalising educational material 
quality of current offered material 
growth of knowledge modules 
re-usage of material 
coordination available material 
diversity of lectures and knowledge modules of better quality 
collections of digital knowledge 
new networked work forms
structural web lectures in higher educational programmes 
impact on quality of teaching and learning 
The Hague University of Applied Sciences 
Academy of Public Management, Law & Safety 
IJsbrand Hoetjes | senior lecturer 
The Hague University of Applied Sciences 
Centre for Research and Development 
Bert Mulder | associate professor 
Martijn Hartog | researcher | m.w.hartog@hhs.nl

Structural adoption of web lectures in higher educational programmes: impact on quality of teaching and learning

  • 1.
    structural web lecturesin higher educational programmes impact on quality of teaching and learning The Hague University of Applied Sciences Academy of Public Management, Law & Safety IJsbrand Hoetjes | senior lecturer The Hague University of Applied Sciences Centre for Research and Development Bert Mulder | associate professor Martijn Hartog | researcher | m.w.hartog@hhs.nl
  • 2.
    introduction online learning(e.g. Arbaugh, 2008) blended learning (e.g. Buchanan et al., 2010) e-learning (e.g. Garrison & Anderson, 2003) web lectures (e.g. Gorissen, 2003; 2011) several explorations in 2006-2009 resulting in structural incorporation of web lectures web lectures / courses preferred by students no decline physical attendance used mainly for exam preparations increased study success rates learning is taking place and time independently
  • 3.
    ‘University 2.0’ TheHague University of Applied Sciences 25.000+ students 4 buildings in 3 cities (The Hague, Delft and Zoetermeer) 43 Bachelor programmes (of which 9 in English) 21 part-time and 10 dual Bachelor programmes 7 Master, 28 post-bachelor en 3 A.D. programmes Research programme, 2012-2013 exploring the broad and structural adoption of web lectures resulting in structural incorporation of web lectures University Development Plan, 2009-2013 Vision Memorandum Education and ICT, 2010 Long term plan ICT in Education, 2012
  • 4.
    method main question: smart and sufficient usage of new media and e-learning resulting in increasing study success 300 recorded lectures (270 at the Academy of Public Management, Law & Safety) 40 different lecturers 5 Academies watched over 6000 hours by students + New media and e-learning Survey EGPA delegates and participants 2012
  • 5.
    technical part exploration recording Mediasite of Sonic Foundry Video infrastructure Mediamission E-learning Cali Author ------------ Distribution & dissemination Blackboard, e-mail etc. standard fully equipped recording location with technical supporting staff
  • 6.
    results 1/2 Students better understanding course material exam preparation purposes repetition of the course material catching up a missed lecture used on different places (home, in transition, University) less time explaining theory more time deepening course material and professional applicability better success rate at the first exam
  • 7.
    results 2/2 Lecturers technical simplicity of recording and disseminating necessity of preparing a script risk of web lecturers replacing other learning material awareness on quality of recorded (course) material better quality questions and reflection more time for interaction improved didactic education improved internal coordination between courses and academies through digital content
  • 8.
    encountered challenges e-learningshould be facilitated structurally and centrally lecturers should use scripts full potential unclear teaching methods expansion and integration no technical problems no decreased physical attendance
  • 9.
    next necessary steps developing more knowledge and experiences with best practices pragmatic model to a sustainable central e-learning system attractive blended learning needs to be pursued establishing, constructing and managing collections of re-usable digital knowledge is determinant
  • 10.
    consequences digitalising educationalmaterial quality of current offered material growth of knowledge modules re-usage of material coordination available material diversity of lectures and knowledge modules of better quality collections of digital knowledge new networked work forms
  • 11.
    structural web lecturesin higher educational programmes impact on quality of teaching and learning The Hague University of Applied Sciences Academy of Public Management, Law & Safety IJsbrand Hoetjes | senior lecturer The Hague University of Applied Sciences Centre for Research and Development Bert Mulder | associate professor Martijn Hartog | researcher | m.w.hartog@hhs.nl

Editor's Notes

  • #6 Reasons why can be read in the paper
  • #7 Reasons why can be read in the paper
  • #8 Reasons why can be read in the paper
  • #9 Reasons why can be read in the paper
  • #11 Reasons why can be read in the paper