The document discusses the requirements and procedures for conducting an Annual Product Quality Review (APQR). Key points include:
- The APQR is intended to verify process consistency, assess trends, determine needed specification/procedure changes, and evaluate revalidation needs.
- Regulatory guidelines like ICH Q7, FDA, and EU require annual reviews that include batch data, deviations, complaints, stability results, and corrective actions.
- The quality unit coordinates the APQR using data and participation from other departments. The review is documented and approved by senior quality management.
Validation: Validation is a documented program that provides high degree of assurance that a specific process, method or system consistently produces a result meeting pre-determined acceptance criteria.
Lean what 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211 are and how you an implement these regulations in your organization. For more information and tips on compliance go to http://compliance-insight.com/fda-gcp-and-gmp-training/21-cfr-210-211/
This presentation is aimed at providing information on automation in the GLP practices in the pharmaceutical industry.
-Standard Operating Procedures.
-Documentation in GALP.
-Logs and Related Forms.
Validation: Validation is a documented program that provides high degree of assurance that a specific process, method or system consistently produces a result meeting pre-determined acceptance criteria.
Lean what 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211 are and how you an implement these regulations in your organization. For more information and tips on compliance go to http://compliance-insight.com/fda-gcp-and-gmp-training/21-cfr-210-211/
This presentation is aimed at providing information on automation in the GLP practices in the pharmaceutical industry.
-Standard Operating Procedures.
-Documentation in GALP.
-Logs and Related Forms.
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.
What is Validation?
What is calibration?
What are the types of Validation ?
Validation and calibration Basic Difference
Complete discussion about the Pharmaceutical validation, its types, difference between calibration and validation, validation master & calibration master plan
This presentation was made to solely for students to make them aware/ understand basics of “Validation”. These slides are part of lectures delivered in M. Pharmacy Curriculum & taken up from various books and websites
This is useful to the chemical analysis persons. Tittration is one of the basic and standard method for quantitative chemical analysis. This describs the principles of titration, function of indicators, calculation of errors etc.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Generating a custom Ruby SDK for your web service or Rails API using Smithyg2nightmarescribd
Have you ever wanted a Ruby client API to communicate with your web service? Smithy is a protocol-agnostic language for defining services and SDKs. Smithy Ruby is an implementation of Smithy that generates a Ruby SDK using a Smithy model. In this talk, we will explore Smithy and Smithy Ruby to learn how to generate custom feature-rich SDKs that can communicate with any web service, such as a Rails JSON API.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
2. “You tell me,
… and I forget.
You teach me,
… and I remember.
You involve me,
… and I learn.”
- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
3. Introduction
• Quality Unit
• APQR
– Requirement
– Responsibility
– Documents and data required
– Preparation and evaluation
– Conclusion
4. ICH Q7- 2.0 Quality Management
• 2.1 Principles
– Define Responsibilities & Authorities
• 2.2 Responsibilities of Quality Unit (s)
– Quality Control / Assurance, Independent of Production
• 2.3 Responsibilities of Production activities
• 2.4 Internal Audits (self Inspection)
• 2.5 Product Quality Review
5. Quality Assurance responsibilities :
• Releasing or rejecting all APIs and intermediates for outside use
• Establishing a system to release or reject raw material intermediates,
packaging and labelling materials ;
• Reviewing completed batch production and laboratory control records
of critical process steps
• Making sure that critical deviations are investigated and resolved;
• Approving all specifications and master production instructions;
• Approving all procedures impacting the quality of intermediates or APIs;
• Making sure that effective systems are used for maintaining and
calibrating critical equipment ;
6. Questions?
• What is an annual product review?
• What is the objective of APR?
• Who is responsible?
• What is procedure & reference for APQR?
• What are the data must be presented in an
annual product review?
• How should an annual product review be
organized?
• Review and conclsion
7. Annual Product Review - WHAT
Directive Statement:
An Annual Product Review must be conducted for
each commercial product. The purpose of this annual
review is to verify the consistency of the process, to assess
trends, to determine the need for changes in specification,
production, manufacturing and/or control procedures and
to evaluate the need for revalidation.
Annual Product Reviews (APRs) are important for
communication between manufacturing, quality and
regulatory Affairs, to enable quality improvement
processes. Content and management of Annual Product
Reviews must be established according to this directive.
8. Reference - APQR
• US FDA –Published in 1978 GMP Guideline which was
included to review the quality standards
• All GMP Guidelines refer the requirement of APQR
– CFR 211.180 (e):
– ICH Q7
– EU GMP
– WHO- GMP
9. Requirement of APQR
• In USA - "Annual Product Review“
• In Europe, the EU GMP Guideline uses the
term "Product Quality Review".
• Requirement or expectations are almost same
• APQR should be conducted for all commercial
product.
• APQR should confirm the State of Control
10. The US Requirements: 21 CFR 211.180 (e)
• US FDA objectives for performing the APR are to
determine the need to make changes in the
– manufacturing process,
– the manufacturing controls (e.g., in-process testing and
monitoring), evaluate the needs for revalidation and
– product specifications.
to evaluate the compliance status of the manufacture and
to identify areas of improvement
A review of a representative number of batches, whether approved or
rejected, and records associated with the batch
A review of complaints, recalls, returned or salvaged drug products,
and investigations conducted under Sec. 211.192 for each drug
product.
11. The Requirements for APIs in ICH Q7
2.5 Product Quality Review
2.50 Regular quality reviews of APIs should be conducted with the objective
of verifying the consistency of the process. Such reviews should normally be
conducted and documented annually and should include at least:
A review of critical in-process control and critical API test results;
A review of all batches that failed to meet established specification (s);
A review of all critical deviations or non-conformances and related
investigations;
A review of any changes carried out to the processes or analytical
methods;
A review of results of the stability monitoring program;
A review of all quality-related returns, complaints and recalls; and
A review of adequacy of corrective actions
12. The Requirements for APIs in ICH Q7
2.5 Product Quality Review
2.51 The results of this review should be evaluated and an
assessment made of whether corrective actions or any
revalidation should be undertaken. Reasons for such corrective
action should be documented. Agreed corrective actions should
be completed in a timely and effective manner.
13. The EU Requirements for PQR (1)
• EU Guidelines to Good Manufacturing Practice ; Medicinal
Products for Human and Veterinary Use ; Part I ; Chapter 1
Quality Management (issued on 25 October 2005)
Product Quality Review
1.5 Regular periodic or rolling quality reviews of all licensed
medicinal products, including export only products, should be
conducted with the objective of verifying consistency of the
existing process, the suitability of current specifications for both
starting materials and finished product to highlight any trends
and to identify product and process improvements. Such reviews
should normally be conducted and documented annually, taking
into account previous reviews, and should include at least:
14. The EU Requirements for PQR (2)
• A review of starting materials and packaging materials used for the
product, especially those from new sources
• A review of critical in- process controls and finished product results
• A review of all batches that failed to meet established
specification(s) and their investigation.
• A review of all significant deviations or non conformances, their
related investigations, and the effectiveness of resultant corrective
and preventative actions taken
• A review of all changes carried out to the processes or analytical
methods
• A review of Marketing Authorisation variations
submitted/granted/refused, including those for third country
(export only) dossiers.
15. The EU Requirements for PQR (3)
• A review of the results of the stability monitoring programme
and any adverse trends
• A review of all quality- related returns, complaints and recalls
and the investigations performed at the time
• A review of adequacy of any other previous product process
or equipment corrective actions. For new marketing
authorisations and variations to marketing authorisations, a
review of post-marketing commitments
• The qualification status of relevant equipment and utilities,
e.g. HVAC, water, compressed gases, etc
• A review of Technical/Quality Agreements to ensure that they
are up to date.
16. Benefit or use
• Decrease the risk of out-of-specification results
• Minimize the risk of rework/reprocessing
• Decrease downtime
• Increase productivity
• Decrease the risk of product recalls
• Meet all regulatory commitments/requirements
• Improve communication between production, engineering,
quality and regulatory functions
17. Responsibilities
• It is responsibilities of QA
• Establish an SOP with responsibility and process of APQR
• Individual departments have to provide the data and
participating in the APQR process.
• Reviews should normally be conducted and documented
• The Quality Unit, as the central position, should request this
review and coordinate the necessary work. Can develop
format/ check list to get information.
• Other departments, like Production, Engineering,
Maintenance, Purchase, etc. are also need to be involved.
• Senior Quality Management must approve the APQR.
18. Requirements
• Written procedures shall be established and it must be followed ;
• APQR must cover a one-year rolling period, but does not have to
coincide with a calendar year
• The review should normally be completed within 60 calendar days
• APQR for all products manufactured
• In case product not manufactured in the year of review , shall
review stability and complaint, Recall & returns etc.
• APQR must be prepared for each water quality grade produced
• For critical utilities it is recommending either to perform a separate
APR or to include a specific chapter in the APR.
• APQR must include all batches of product (accepted /rejected
/destroyed )
• APQR must address the assessment of data, documents and
electronic records reviewed
19. Preparation
• Appropriate statistical tools may be used to assess process capability
when data from a large number of batches is being reviewed.
• Where the data concludes that there is a drift in process capability ,
actions should be determined to evaluate the causes and improve
performance in the forthcoming review period.
• The review of all batches which fail to meet specification and the review
of critical deviations
• should look specifically at recurring causes and identify appropriate
actions to reduce the frequency and improve performance.
20. Corrective action
• Equipment not functioning correctly or in need of
maintenance or replacement.
• Inadequate batch instructions or training of operators.
• Process parameters so tightly defined that the equipment is
not capable of routinely
• achieving the acceptance criteria.
• Inhomogeneous product or inadequate sampling procedures.
• Poor quality raw materials or lack of control of raw material
suppliers.
• Retest period or expiry date
• Revalidation, requalification
21. Review and document
• Review must include, at a minimum
• Review of any recommendations and actions taken from
prior report
• "Basic statistics"
Number of batches manufactured, including partially completed
batches and corresponding yields
Number and percentage of batches rejected, reworked or reprocessed
and related reasons
Critical in-process controls, finished product results and critical API
test results
22. Review and document
• Review of "deviations from the validated state“
A review of all batches that failed to meet established specification(s) and
their investigation
Significant/critical deviations, Out of Specification Results and related failure
investigations (review of adequacy and effectiveness of corrective and
preventative actions taken)
Product quality complaints &Product Recalls
Quality related issues for returned, and/or salvaged goods
Changes effected (change control) and variations during the period (e.g.
process, suppliers, equipment, critical utilities)
Changes of product specifications or methods (e.g. analytical changes, and
results)
23. Review and document
• Effectiveness of implementation of CAPA
• out of calibration results;
• Process and analytical equipment retirement;
• Water quality ;
• Validation carried out in process and analytical method;
• results of the stability monitoring program;
• Environment monitoring (bio-burden) in the clean room;
• Yield output variations;
• return goods and salvage of product;
• Retain sample
• Regulatory issues if any
24. Review and document
• Trend Analysis
Trend analysis on key in-process and release testing with graphic
representation and basic statistics recommended
A review of the results of the stability monitoring program and trend
analysis on stability data
• Observations/Recommendations an conclusion
Report the review observations.
Recommendations from this review
• The results of the APR must be evaluated and an assessment made
whether corrective or preventive action or any re-validation is necessary.
• A conclusion statement must be written to assess if the product
consistently meets its quality attributes, and if not, what actions need to
be taken.
• Rationale for such CAPAs must be documented.
25. Data collection Volatile substances
S.No Related substances by GC
by GC
Imp-A Imp-K Sum of Methanol Toluene
impurities
% MC
%Assay
Batch number
26. Trend Chart
XXXXXX Batch Vs % of Assay
106
104
USL
102 UNSL
100
Upper limit
MEAN
%
Assay
A
y
a
s
98
LNSL
96
LSL
94
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85
Batch Number
% Assy
Mean : 99.8
Standard Deviation : 0.1
Minimum : 99.5
Maximum : 100.1
RSD : 0.1
Lower
Natural specification Limit :
Limit 99.4
Upper
( µ ± 3σ) :
Limit 100.2
98.0-102.0
Specification or Parameter Range :
%
28. Process capability
Process consistency can be established by Cpk
Process capability index (Cpk) can be calculated as below;
SU - S L
CPk = ---------
3σ
One sided specification
SU – x x - SL
CPk = ---------- or CP = ---------
3σ 3σ
1.33 ≤CPk Satisfiable enough
1.00 ≤CPk < 1.33 Adequate
CPk < 1.00 Inadequate
29. Process consistency- Yield
Yield range : 100 -120 kg
Std deviation : 3.0
Mean : 110kg
20
Cpk = ------------ = 1.11
6*3.0
After change made in the process
Std deviation : 2.2 and mean 112 kg
20
Cpk = ------------ = 1.515
6*2.2
31. Stability trend
%Assay
Mean : 99.7%
Standard Deviation : 0.1%
Minimum : 99.4%
Maximum : 99.9%
RSD : 0.1%
Natural specification Limit Lower : 99.3%
Limit
Upper
( µ ± 3σ) : 100.0%
Limit
Specification or Parameter Range : 99.0 % to 100.5 %
32. Review of documents & system
Data collection and review
• Manufacturing instructions and packaging procedures
• Changes compared to the previous year
• Validation status following a change
• Batch production records
• Actual values for process parameters during production
• IPC data
• Deviations
• Yield
• Raw materials
• Test procedures
• Changes to specifications or methods compared to the previous
year
• Validation status of the test methods
33. Review of documents & system
Data collection and review
• Quality System
– Deviations
– OOS
– Failure cause analysis
• Vendor status
– Change of vendor
– Supplier qualification and approval
– Deviations, rejections of raw material
• Modification
– Changes to the facility
– Changes to machines/apparatus
– Changes to super ordinate processes
34. Review of documents & system
Data collection and review
• Quality attributes (analytical data)
– Key starting material/critical material
– Critical test result of IPC, intermediates
– Critical quality parameters of finished product/blended
– Decision on the trend- tightening of spec, CAPA, validation
requirement if any
• All quality-related returns, complaints and recalls
• Adequacy of corrective actions
• Stability data
– Changes to packaging material
– Process changes
35. Inferences from the APR
• Follow-up actions may be included but are not limited to:
Product process improvement
Analytical method improvements
In-process or final product specification review
Revalidation
Product recall or withdrawal
New packaging
36. Check List for APQR
• Are there any outstanding validation commitments or corrective and
preventive action plans from last APQR ?
• Are the processes in a validated state or is additional validation work
needed ?
• Is the qualification status (IQ/OQ/PQ) acceptable ?
• Are all critical aspects performing satisfactorily or are corrective/
preventive action plans required ?
• Are there any significant findings concerning data trending of the
manufacturing process, starting materials, or packaging materials ?
• Are all change controls implemented, and closed? Communicated to the
relevant customers and regulatory agencies?
• Are all change controls, deviations, OOS investigation, complaints are
reviewed, investigated, CAPA implemented, and closed?
37. Check List for APQR
• Are there any significant findings concerning
– changes performed ?
– specifications or test methods ?
– deviations and non- conformances ?
– out of specification results ?
– rejected batches, quality-related returns, customer complaints, or recalls ?
– the stability monitoring program ?
– retain sample examination ?
• Are all post- marketing commitments to Authorities met ?
• Are all required Technical Agreements in place and up-to-
date ?