Download to read offline
Uploaded byILRI
The social dimensions of mitigation
The document details a roundtable meeting on the social dimensions of greenhouse gas mitigation held in Nairobi in 2016, focusing on climate finance, the adoption of climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices, and the socio-institutional analysis of dairy production in various counties. It highlights barriers to participation for smallholders, the impact of social context on production practices, and the need for policies that incentivize greenhouse gas emission reductions and enhance profitability. Recommendations for research include assessing value chains and identifying enabling factors to promote technical change and sustainable practices.
More Related Content
Similar to The social dimensions of mitigation
![Human Reproduction [ Reproductive System ] Notes @irfanullah_mehar Irfanullah...](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/humanreproductionreproductivesystemnotesirfanullahmeharirfanullahmeharjanantantra-260111172350-56e85778-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
The social dimensions of mitigation
- 1. The Social Dimensions ofMitigation Greenhouse Gas Inventory Roundtable Meeting ILRI, Nairobi, 3-4 May 2016 Todd A. Crane
- 2. Baseline, Practices & EFs Experimentation &Socio-institutional analysis On-farm & institutional experiments & MRV testing Input for LED planning, pursuit of NAMA targets Potential LED implementation Mechanisms identified Outreach to LED & Climate finance institutions Climate finance mechanisms support CSA technologies - Tested MRVs - Functioning CF institutions Year1Year2Year3Year5Year4 country level country level 3 counties 3 counties Adoption of CSA practices for greening livestock Social Dimensions of Mitigation Funders: IFAD & CCAFS 2 counties 2 counties
- 3. Baseline, Practices & EFs Experimentation &Socio-institutional analysis On-farm & institutional experiments & MRV testing Input for LED planning, pursuit of NAMA targets Potential LED implementation Mechanisms identified Outreach to LED & Climate finance institutions Climate finance mechanisms support CSA technologies - Tested MRVs - Functioning CF institutions Year1Year2Year3Year5Year4 country level country level 3 counties 3 counties Adoption of CSA practices for greening livestock Social Dimensions of Mitigation Funders: IFAD & CCAFS 2 counties 2 counties
- 4. Social Dimensions ofMitigation • Technologies for mitigation – Efficiency – Productivity – Profitability • Policies for mitigation – Climate Finance mechanisms – Carbon and GHG sequestration payments
- 5. Social Dimensions ofMitigation • Current system – Weak integration of smallholders in formal markets – No incentives to reduce GHG emissions – Incentive for productivity, but several barriers exist – Social organization affects change • Technical practices done in social contexts • Different practices work in different contexts
- 6. Social Dimensions ofMitigation • Production practices shaped by – Social distribution of • Labor • Resource control • Benefit – Value chain organization • Access to inputs • Standards imposed by formal processors • Technical support • Social, financial, and technical barriers
- 7. Social Dimensions ofMitigation • Research activities – Analyse value chains, social institutions, and HH dynamics affecting technical practices • What barriers to upgrading do different types of producers face and how can these be overcome? • Which practices work for which producers? • What are enabling factors of practices and drivers of technical change?
- 8. Social Dimensions ofMitigation • Research activities – Analyse value chains, social institutions, and HH dynamics affecting technical practices – Identify policy mechanisms to incentivize practices: • More profitable dairy production • Reduction of GHG emission factors • Rural development goals
- 9. Social Dimensions ofMitigation • Research activities – Analyse value chains, social institutions, and HH dynamics affecting technical practices – Identify policy mechanisms to incentivize practices • Impact activities – Assessment of LED dairy technologies – Development of dairy NAMA
- 10. Baseline, Practices & EFs Experimentation &Socio-institutional analysis On-farm & institutional experiments & MRV testing Input for LED planning, pursuit of NAMA targets Potential LED implementation Mechanisms identified Outreach to LED & Climate finance institutions Climate finance mechanisms support CSA technologies - Tested MRVs - Functioning CF institutions Year1Year2Year3Year5Year4 country level country level 3 counties 3 counties Adoption of CSA practices for greening livestock Questions?? 2 counties 2 counties
Editor's Notes
- #2 Presentation objectives Outlining social science research agenda for mitigation Bringing mitigation research into practice Technological change Policy mechanisms
- #6 Families, Neighborhoods, Cooperatives, Value chains, counties and countries.
- #8 Families, Neighborhoods, Cooperatives, Value chain, counties and countries.
- #9 Families, Neighborhoods, Cooperatives, Value chain, counties and countries.
- #10 Families, Neighborhoods, Cooperatives, Value chain, counties and countries.