1. The document outlines an improvement project to implement 5S activities in the finishing department to increase output and decrease time spent looking for items. 2. The project team will conduct training, create checklists, label safety items, remove unnecessary items, and implement sorting and set in order. 3. The scope includes all 5S activities and standardizing work to reduce inconsistencies between operators and lost capacity.

1. Improvement Objectives (Define) Team Charter A3-T Project Title: Finishing 5s Project Team Leader: Ryan McVey Team Members: John Monaghan, Kim Walker, Andrew Twarog, 3 Operators Document NO.: QA005.1 Effective Date 4/22/08 Howard Wu & Paul Waterman (approval) John M, Joe A., Rich H., Tony V., Operators (Implementation) Joe C., Tom P., Kevin S., Rich S., Mario G. (FYI) Ensure to not standardize waste Sustainability Loss of morale (employee involvement) Balancing production priorities with improvement Operator availability Off-shift involvement 0% Operator 5S Training 36% Increase % of items that have proper safety labels and procedures. 0% Free up floor space Decrease time spent looking for items Improve output AFTER BASELINE Problem Statement (Define) Lack of 5S in the finishing Department results in decreased output Risks Project approach Plan Stakeholders TEAM 5/1 Define current/Future spaghetti map Ryan + TEAM 4/22 Create 5S Checklist (as a work in process) Ryan 4/24 Collect Baseline Data 5/2 Label safety items and work instructions Measure the improvements Write the summary report Ryan 5/2 Kaizen Event – Remove UDE’s 4/29 Training 2S – Set in Order Ryan + Andrew 4/22 Define 1S Zones and Red Tag Holding Location TEAM 4/28 Training & Implement 1S – Sort – Red Tag. Identify UDE’s Ryan 4/25 Kick off meeting Ryan 4/23 Define selected operator team members (target 1/shift) Responsible Target Date Action Scope (Define) Scope includes all 5S activities Note: moving and taping of equipment which will occur during Standardized Work.

5. Inconsistencies between operators causing inconsistencies in time. These conditions result in lost capacity. Improvement Objectives (Define/Measure) Team Charter A3-T Project Title: Finishing std work Team Leader: Andrew Twarog Team Members: John Monaghan, Kim Walker, 3 Operators Document NO.: QA005.1 Effective Date 4/22/08 Howard Wu & Paul Waterman (approval) John M, Joe A., Rich H., Operators (Implementation) Kevin S., Rich S., Mario G. (FYI) Sustainability Ensure to not standardize waste Loss of morale (employee involvement) Balancing production priorities with improvement Operator availability Low frequency of set up observations Scope includes: # change over, Ball type change over, Cold start up. No Establish if Standardized Work exists Time for Cold start ups Time to do ball type change over Time to do number change AFTER BASELINE Problem Statement (Define) Risks Project approach Plan Stakeholders Twarog 6/30/08 Close out meeting/sign off Twarog 6/27/08 Write Report Twarog 5/16/2008 Train Supervisors to amend Standardized Work TEAM 6/9/08, 6/23/08 Repeat process for Cold Start up and ball change procedure TEAM 6/9/08, 6/23/08 Implement number change standardized work TEAM/Twarog 5/19/08 Write documents for document change TEAM 5/6/08 Analyze current condition for number change TEAM 5/2/08 Capture current condition for number change Twarog 4/2908 Kick off meeting Responsible Target Date Action Scope (Define)

6. Improvement Objectives (Define/Measure) Team Charter A3-T Project Title: Finishing capacity project Team Leader: Kim Walker Team Members: John Monaghan, Ryan McVey, 3 Operators Document NO.: QA005.1 Effective Date 4/22/08 Howard Wu & Paul Waterman (approval) John M, Joe A., Rich H., Rich S., Operators (Implementation) Kevin S., Mario G. (FYI) Ensure to not standardize waste Sustainability Loss of morale (employee involvement) Balancing production priorities with improvement Operator availability Off-shift involvement The finished good output from Lines 1, 2, 4/5, 6. Reduce downtime Reduce scrap Value Vs. Non value process steps and time Improve output AFTER BASELINE Problem Statement (Define) Currently not able to consistently meet desired output Risks Project approach Plan Stakeholders Follow up Final report Implements Identify implementation plan Brainstorm root causes / solutions / Benefits Affinity diagram with core team plus engineering (6-10 people (2 hr) Collect data 5/2/2008 interviews Responsible Target Date Action Scope (Define)