This study examined the feasibility of using the Rapid Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness (RATE) observation instrument with pre-service teachers. 38 faculty members at East Carolina University received training to use RATE and then scored videos of 179 teacher candidates' lessons. The study found that while inter-rater reliability was higher than previous RATE validation studies, discrepancies still existed between paired raters' scores. Using two raters to score each video seemed prohibitive for a large teacher preparation program. However, maintaining reliability and validity may require two raters. The study aims to further pilot RATE with live observations and examine its predictive validity.
Innovative and Inquiry-based Teaching for Excellenceglhanley
Description of an international collaborative project between the California State University, Long Beach, MERLOT (www.merlot.org), and the Academic Staff College of Lucknow University, India to redesign higher education instruction in India. The project is partially funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Inquiry-based learning and the innovative use of Open Educational Resources within the context of defining and assessing student learning outcomes is the focus of the collaborative effort.
In this presentation, Dr. Angela Stone Martin provides guidance to educational leaders engaging in the change process. The presentation addresses the efficiency and impact of the Teacher Effectiveness Initiative for teacher evaluations in Tennessee. The presentation also describes the roles in place to drive the initiative, including instructional coaching, teacher classifications, and implementation strategies. The Concerns-Based Adoption Model serves as a vehicle to ensure compliance with change initiatives as well as garner feedback from teachers to determine their level of use with new modalities.
Terry Handley - Assessing Pupils Progress in ICTNaace Naace
Assessing Pupils’ Progress (APP) is the new national approach to assessment that equips teachers to make judgments on pupils’ progress, fine-tune their understanding of learners’ needs, and tailors their planning and teaching accordingly. QCA have recently piloted this approach in ICT to compliment those already developed for Science, Mathematics and English. The pilot has been greeted enthusiastically by the teachers involved.
This session will introduce the methodology and some of the materials developed in addition to hearing from one of the pilot schools about their experience.
Innovative and Inquiry-based Teaching for Excellenceglhanley
Description of an international collaborative project between the California State University, Long Beach, MERLOT (www.merlot.org), and the Academic Staff College of Lucknow University, India to redesign higher education instruction in India. The project is partially funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Inquiry-based learning and the innovative use of Open Educational Resources within the context of defining and assessing student learning outcomes is the focus of the collaborative effort.
In this presentation, Dr. Angela Stone Martin provides guidance to educational leaders engaging in the change process. The presentation addresses the efficiency and impact of the Teacher Effectiveness Initiative for teacher evaluations in Tennessee. The presentation also describes the roles in place to drive the initiative, including instructional coaching, teacher classifications, and implementation strategies. The Concerns-Based Adoption Model serves as a vehicle to ensure compliance with change initiatives as well as garner feedback from teachers to determine their level of use with new modalities.
Terry Handley - Assessing Pupils Progress in ICTNaace Naace
Assessing Pupils’ Progress (APP) is the new national approach to assessment that equips teachers to make judgments on pupils’ progress, fine-tune their understanding of learners’ needs, and tailors their planning and teaching accordingly. QCA have recently piloted this approach in ICT to compliment those already developed for Science, Mathematics and English. The pilot has been greeted enthusiastically by the teachers involved.
This session will introduce the methodology and some of the materials developed in addition to hearing from one of the pilot schools about their experience.
www.earnperhit.com/essay => Professional academic writing
www.Lucky-Bet.site => Bet on Sports - 50% Deposit Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/casino => Online Casino - 5000$ Welcome Bonus
www.Lucky-Bet.site/lotto247 => Lotto247 - Win Big, Live Free
www.Lucky-Bet.site/eurobet => Best European Bookmaker
Discussion ab out trends in assessment and accountability for National Superintendent's Dialogue
An Assessment of Professional Standards exhibited by Teacher Educators in Col...Premier Publishers
Multiple measures capturing different aspects of teacher educators’ performances, including analysis of artefacts, self-report and student survey are being encouraged in teacher evaluation. The current professional standards developed by the National Commission for Colleges of Education (NCCE) in Nigeria included the use of students’ observation of some aspects of teacher educators’ practices in their evaluation. In this study, the teacher educators’ performance on some of the professional standards was assessed using students’ ratings. A questionnaire was used to gather the required data. The findings of this study suggest that the students perceived that the teacher educators exhibited the following attributes
i. Foster scientific enquiry within instructional framework.
ii. Create enabling learning environment.
iii. Use formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate students’ progress.
iv. Demonstrate professional values and practices that support teacher education programme. The findings further suggest that the students did not perceive that the teacher educators employed diverse instructional resources in their classroom. It is concluded on the basis of the findings that students’ ratings/feedback could be considered a valid source of information on some teacher educators’ performances, and should be harnessed in the assessment process.
Inside Teacher Training: What Works to Make It Better?David Evans
I prepared this talk on how to improve the quality of in-service teacher training -- with a light treatment of pre-service training -- last week for a conference with the Ministry of Education in Brazil.
Presentation on large-scale e-Learning for Educators online professional development program and research with online training and courses by EdTech Leaders Online at EDC.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Feasibility of Using RATE with Teacher Candidates
1. 2016
ANN BULLOCK, KRISTEN CUTHRELL,
ELIZABETH FOGARTY, JOY STAPLETON
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY
C O L L E G E O F E D U C A T I O N
D E P A R T M E N T O F E L E M E N T A R Y E D U C A T I O N A N D
M I D D L E G R A D E S E D U C A T I O N
Feasibility of Using RATE with
Teacher Candidates
3. Context
Importance of assessment system with multiple
measures of effectiveness
Our home-grown assessments found to be invalid or
unreliable measures of performance (Henry et al., 2013)
Portfolio assessment
Dispositions
Observation Instrument
4. Rapid Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness
RATE is a validated observation instrument in use
with practicing teachers
Draws on existing teacher effectiveness
constructs
Observe classroom lesson videos; Results in less
expensive teacher observation
Focuses on direct instruction
RATE design has 6 items, each item is assessed on a 3
point scale (Gargani and Strong,2014)
6. Research Questions
RQ 1: Does the RATE observation instrument’s
reliability and validity hold when used with pre-
service teachers?
RQ2: Is the RATE observation instrument a feasible
instrument to be used by large teacher education
programs?
RQ3: Do you have to use two raters in order for the
rater scores to remain reliable and valid?
7. Procedures - Videos
Preservice Teachers:
ELEM candidates submit full lesson videos to an electronic
portfolio system during final semester of internship
identify their subject, topic, and 20 consecutive minutes of
direct instruction to be viewed
179 videos were used for scoring in this study
8. Procedures- Training
March 2015
Strong and Gargani held an orientation session with 38
faculty, university supervisors, instructional coaches and COE
administrators
Focus was on introducing faculty to the RATE instrument
May 2015
Day 1: 38 participants received training on the RATE
instrument
Day 2: participants scored videos
9. Procedures - Scoring
8 30 minute sessions were held on Day 2
Within each 30 minute session a participant would score the
20 minute video individually then meet with the other person
who scored the video.
Scores were compared and reconciled
150/179 videos were scored twice using both rater
pairs and solo raters
At a later date- RATE personnel evaluated all videos
for comparison purposes.
13. Conclusions
RQ 1: Discrepancies in paired scores exist but rater
reliability was higher than in initial RATE validation study
Biggest discrepancy: clarity and flow
RQ 2: Instrument is shorter and less complex than
existing instrument
However, having two individuals rate one video seems
prohibitive in a large program.
RQ 3: To maintain reliability and validity two raters are
needed.
14. Next Steps
Pilot RATE instrument with preservice teachers in
live observations (spring 2016)
Determine predictive nature of RATE with
preservice teacher observation
Explore relationship between RATE and CLASS instruments
Explore relationship and possible predictive nature of RATE
with edTPA
15. References
Cuthrell, K., Stapleton, J., Bullock, A., Lys, D., Smith, J., and Fogarty, E. (2014). Mapping the
journey of reform and assessment for an elementary education teacher preparation program. Journal of
Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1).
Gargani, J., & Strong, M. A. (2014). Can we identify a successful teacher better, faster, and
cheaper? Evidence for innovating teacher observation systems. Journal of Teacher Education. Pre-print
copies available online.
Good, T., & Lavigne, A. (2015). Response to "Rating Teachers Cheaper, Faster, and Better: Not
So Fast": It's about evidence. Journal of Teacher Education, 0: 0022487115587110v1-
22487115587110
Henry, G. T., Campbell, S. L., Thompson, C. L., Patriarca, L. A., Luterbach, K .J., Lys, D. B., &
Covington, V. M. (2013). The predictive validity of measures of teacher candidate programs and
performance: Toward an evidence-based approach to teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher
Education 64, 439-453.
Sawchuk, S. (2011). University of Michigan project scales up "high leverage" teaching practices.
Education Week. Retrieved from the www on August 31, 2012 at
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2011/10/high_leverage_teaching_practices.html
Strong, M., Gargani, J., & Hacifazlioğlu, Ö. (2011). Do we know a successful teacher when we
see one? Experiments in the identification of effective teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4),
367-382.
Strong, M. (2011). The Highly Qualified Teacher: What is Teacher Quality and How Do We
Measure It? New York: Teachers College Press.
COE Innovations were borne out of a 9 million dollar TQP grant and allowed for the evaluation partnership with EPIC mentioned earlier. The goals of the
The lack of ability to make reliable assumptions about our candidates based on available data drove both program leadership and faculty to look for a more reliable method for assessing the readiness of teacher candidates
edTPA, Dispositions form that is enacted 3 times during the program, by multiple evaluators
Follow up conversations with university supervisors revealed that they were reluctant to score a teacher candidate down in an area on the instrument because they were trying to be supportive, thus not using the observation instrument as an evaluation tool but rather a developmental tool with teacher candidates. The use of the observation instrument for different purposes led to grade documentation issues with teacher candidates. For example, many times at the end of the semester the “scores” on the observation instrument would not show any deficits but the supervisor would want to give the teacher candidate a lower grade. Without evidence of reduced performance from the observation instrument, giving the intern a lower grade was not always possible. This data-driven knowledge led us to investigate other reliable and valid observation instruments.
RATE design consists of six items relating to the lesson objective, instructional delivery mechanisms, teacher questioning strategies, clarity of presentation of concepts, time on task, and level of student understanding. Each item is assessed on a 3-point scale, and evaluators are encouraged to jot down notes to support their scores.
Widely accepted frameworks include Danielson (2011) Framework for Teaching; Teaching Works Framework (Sawchuck, 2011), the Gates Foundation Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) project (Danielson, 2010); and Marzano’s Classroom Instruction that Works (Marzano, Pickering, and Pollock, 2009).
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
As a program requirement, teacher candidates submitted a final teaching video at the end of their internship semester. Full lesson videos were submitted to Taskstream, an electronic portfolio platform. Upon submission, candidates were asked to identify their subject, topic, and 20 consecutive minutes of direct instruction captured in the full lesson video. These videos were the subject of this research project.
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
In March 2015, Strong and Gargani provided an orientation session on the RATE instrument for 38 ECU faculty (across all content areas), university supervisors, school district instructional coaches, and college of education administration faculty. This session focused on introducing faculty to the RATE instrument and how it may be helpful for teacher candidates. Strong and Gargani returned in May 2015. On the first day, thirty-eight university faculty (across all content areas) participated in eight hours of orientation and training on the RATE instrument. In the second day, each participant scored 8 videos in 30 minute time segments (a four hour time period plus breaks). The 30 minute timeframe included viewing the video clip, recording the scores on the RATE instrument, then conferring with a partner who viewed the same video. During the conferring, scores were reconciled. Each of the 150 videos were scored twice using both rater pairs and solo raters. Off site, trained RATE personnel evaluated all videos for comparison purposes.
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
In March 2015, Strong and Gargani provided an orientation session on the RATE instrument for 38 ECU faculty (across all content areas), university supervisors, school district instructional coaches, and college of education administration faculty. This session focused on introducing faculty to the RATE instrument and how it may be helpful for teacher candidates. Strong and Gargani returned in May 2015. On the first day, thirty-eight university faculty (across all content areas) participated in eight hours of orientation and training on the RATE instrument. In the second day, each participant scored 8 videos in 30 minute time segments (a four hour time period plus breaks). The 30 minute timeframe included viewing the video clip, recording the scores on the RATE instrument, then conferring with a partner who viewed the same video. During the conferring, scores were reconciled. Each of the 150 videos were scored twice using both rater pairs and solo raters. Off site, trained RATE personnel evaluated all videos for comparison purposes.
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
In March 2015, Strong and Gargani provided an orientation session on the RATE instrument for 38 ECU faculty (across all content areas), university supervisors, school district instructional coaches, and college of education administration faculty. This session focused on introducing faculty to the RATE instrument and how it may be helpful for teacher candidates. Strong and Gargani returned in May 2015. On the first day, thirty-eight university faculty (across all content areas) participated in eight hours of orientation and training on the RATE instrument. In the second day, each participant scored 8 videos in 30 minute time segments (a four hour time period plus breaks). The 30 minute timeframe included viewing the video clip, recording the scores on the RATE instrument, then conferring with a partner who viewed the same video. During the conferring, scores were reconciled. Each of the 150 videos were scored twice using both rater pairs and solo raters. Off site, trained RATE personnel evaluated all videos for comparison purposes.
In total, 179 university videos were used for scoring. Of the 179, 150 were scored by both members of a pair. Of the 150 videos scored by two raters, only 70 videos were watched with no flags. Flags consisted of video issues including the video being too long, too short, the rater knowing the teacher in the video, and/or audio issues. For the purposes of this study, some of the analyses used all 150 videos while others used 70 videos.
ECU faculty tended to rate teacher candidates higher on the lesson objective and student thinking portion of the videos. They tended to score teacher candidates lower on checking for understanding, clarity of delivery, flow of instruction, and time on task.
While there was good agreement among raters in most areas, flow of instruction seemed to show the biggest discrepancy. The cause of this discrepancy is not immediately apparent and warrants further examination.
It appears that discussing ratings with another person brings the extreme raters closer back to the norm. The closer the score was to the norm, the less it moved. The closer it was to the norm, the more it moved. This finding especially holds for ECU raters. RATE team scores were less variable across the rater.
Open circle is independent score
Close is revised sum scores
Even though discrepancies existed, rater reliability was higher in this study than in the RATE’s (VS7) validation study and the MET study conducted by the Gates Family Foundation. The biggest discrepancies occurred in the ECU faculty’s rating of clarity and flow of the lesson. Further exploration into the faculty’s interpretation of these categories is needed before that discrepancy can be explained.
The instrument itself is shorter and less complex than the current version of the instrument and requires only a 20 minute observation. One concern coming into the proof of concept study was that two raters were needed for each video. Given the large number of individuals within the program, having two individuals rate each person seems prohibitive. However, data indicate that having two raters for each video tends to hold weakly justified extreme scores in check. Since the raters are trained to do each session in a 30 minute time period, the process may actually end up taking the same amount of time, if not less time.
Continuing research is being conducted on observation practices that are effective and whether RATE is an observation instrument that can best support candidate growth in challenging clinical experiences. Being able to use the RATE instrument in live setting with teacher candidates would help teacher education programs have a reliable and valid outcome measure of their teachers. This measure in addition to other reliable outcomes measures, such as, the edTPA, would strengthen programs’ ability to predict the success of their graduates.