Download to read offline
![references
Wiley, D. and Hilton, J. (2009) Openness, Dynamic Specialization, and the
Disaggregated Future of Higher Education, in: International Review of Research in
Open and Distance Learning, Volume 10, Number 5, 2009, pp. 1-16., available at
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/768 [accessed 25 February 2013]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/fdol131unit5-130426101635-phpapp02/85/Fdol131-unit5-Open-practicies-with-Carol-Yeager-34-320.jpg)
More Related Content
Fdol131 unit5: Open practicies with Carol Yeager
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Open practice for you “Openness is afundamental value underlying significant changes in society and is a prerequisite to changes institutions of higher education need to make in order to remain relevant to the society in which they exist. There are a number of ways institutions can be more open, including programs of open sharing of educational materials. Individual faculty can also choose to be more open without waiting for institutional programs. Increasing degrees of openness in society coupled with innovations in business strategy like dynamic specialization are enabling radical experiments in higher education and exerting increasing competitive pressure on conventional higher education institutions. No single response to the changes in the supersystem of higher education can successfully address every institution’s situation. However, every institution must begin addressing openness as a core organizational value if it desires to both remain relevant to its learners and to contribute to the positive advancement of the field of higher “ (Wiley and Hilton, 2009, 1)
- 4.
- 5.
- 7.
- 8.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15. Co‐Facilitators and Researcher Betty Hurley-Dasgupta and CarolYeager Catherine A. Bliss With RetSam Zhang, tech support
- 16. Our first MOOC Fall 2011 (http://cdlprojects.com/ ) Offered forboth credit and not for credit
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 23.
- 25. You Tube Videosof VizMath Presentations
- 26. Questions • What challenges do cMOOCs present for assessing learning gained through engaging with the MOOC, including other MOOC participants? •Is the cMOOC an accessible learning environment for all learners? • What are essential elements of a MOOC? Is size (over 100) sufficient for it to be a MOOC? • Is a cMOOC really a course?
- 27.
- 28.
- 29. Some References • Research article on MOOCs: • http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/104 1/2025 •Dave Cormier on MOOCs: • http://davecormier.com/edblog/2012/07/31/20‐ questions‐and‐answers‐about‐moocs/ • George Siemens on MOOCs (video): • http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/george‐siemens‐on‐ massive‐open‐online‐courses/2011/05/14 • Stephen Downes on MOOCs (video): • http://www.slideshare.net/Downes/xmooc‐the‐massive‐ open‐online‐course‐in‐theory‐and‐in‐practice
- 30. As these onlineuniversities gain traction, and start counting for actual college course credit, they’ll most likely have enormous real-world impact. They’ll help in getting jobs and creating business ideas. They might just live up to their hype. For millions of people around the globe with few resources, MOOCs may even be life-changing. A.J. Jacobs http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/opinion/sunday/grading-the- mooc-university.html?hp
- 32. FDOL131 updates Maria and Lars unit 5: week 2 now •work on last PBL task •share when completed and provide feedback to another group unit 6: webinar led by FDOL participants Sharing experiences and learning: Looking back and ahead mini presentations by the groups (5‐10 mins per group) 1. PBL group 1 2.PBL group 2 3. PBL group 3 4. PBL group 5/6
- 33.
- 34. references Wiley, D. andHilton, J. (2009) Openness, Dynamic Specialization, and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education, in: International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Volume 10, Number 5, 2009, pp. 1-16., available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/768 [accessed 25 February 2013]