Download to read offline
![Strong Message: Personalize
Learning
Hobsons 2011 P-20 Summit
“No org has been able to successfully assemble data to facilitate the career-
education trajectory”
“Too many students see $ as THE roadblock to postsecondary ed”
“TurboTax or Mint.com for ed decision-making”
“Consistent solution throughout P-20 – sticky”
“Enable students to start their HE path earlier, if ready…dual enrollment”
[Sample Board Members: Ron Huberman, JB Buxton, Margot Rogers, Larry Leverett, Eric
Fingerhut, Bob Ptachik, Andy Rotherham, Barbara O‟Brian]
27](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/facilitatingstudentsuccesstoddbloom-120921102115-phpapp02/75/Facilitating-Student-Success-Across-the-P-20-Continuum-27-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byHobsons
Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum
The document discusses various macro forces influencing the P-20 education continuum, focusing on individualized learning plans and their implementation across states. It emphasizes the need for education reform to ensure student readiness for college and careers by 2020 while highlighting the challenges and demands of a consumer-driven education landscape. Additionally, it outlines the importance of personalized learning, student engagement, and the integration of systematic support to foster student success.
More Related Content
Similar to Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum
Facilitating Student Success Across the P-20 Continuum
- 1. Facilitating Student SuccessAcross the P-20 Continuum Todd Bloom, Ph.D. September 14, 2012
- 2. Welcome & Overview • Hobsons and Insights into Student Choice • Three Macro Forces Influencing P-20 • Individualized Learning Plans and States 2
- 3. Hobsons & Insightsinto Student Choice
- 4.
- 5. Career College Course Success 5
- 6. Access Engagement Consider Connection 6
- 7. Orientate Advise Alert Communicate 7
- 8. Naviance by theNumbers • Over 5,500 schools using Naviance today • About 800 middle schools • 4.8 million active students • Over 200,000 educators with active accounts 8
- 9. College Statistics (Naviance specific) • 1,055,000 students in class of 2012 • 3.4 million college applications tracked in Naviance for class of 2012 (average of 3.2 apps/student – slightly up) • Our public schools averaged 2.7 apps per student (slightly up) • Our private schools averaged 5.5 apps per student (unchanged) 9
- 10. Early Action/Decision (Naviancespecific) 10
- 11.
- 12. Singer and chef have declined 12
- 13. Course Statistics (Naviance specific) • About 18 million course history records • Most common course subject failed is Algebra I (by a 50% margin over any other subject) • Geometry, Biology and English are the next most common 13
- 14. Macro Forces InfluencingP-20 Education
- 15. Global Economic Competitiveness “The goal for America’s educational system is clear: Every student should graduate from high school ready for college and a career by 2020. We must lead the world in college completion by 2020.” –President Obama We’re in 16th place, and we’ve heard this before: • 1983 – A Nation at Risk (standards) • 1994 – Goals 2000 (performance targets) • 2001 – No Child Left Behind (accountability) • 2009 – ARRA /Race to the Top 15
- 16. Global Economic Competitiveness http://chronicle.com/article/A-Crisis-of-Confidence/127530/ 16
- 17. Global Economic Competitiveness Supply & demand challenge: “In 15 years, the U.S. will be 1,000,000 degreed students short in order to fill U.S. jobs – 1,000,000 good- paying, professional jobs will need to be „outsourced‟” –Bruce Vandal, Director, Postsecondary & Workforce Development Institute, Education Commission of the States, 2011 17
- 18.
- 19. Cost of Education– Financial Crunch State Revenue Student Expectations ARRA State Fiscal Stabilization Funds Accountability for Spend Median Family Income Cost of College 19
- 20. Cost of Education– K-12 Provider 20
- 21. Cost of Education– HE Provider 21
- 22. Consumer-Driven Education 17.6 M undergrads in U.S. higher ed today: 37% 32% 36% Enroll part-time Work full-time Graduate in 4 yrs What are these buyers’ preferences and requirements? 22
- 23. Consumer-Driven Education And the customer will “look” different in the future: K-12 student demographics (2010 to 2020) • flat for students who are White; Black; • increase 25% for students who are Hispanic; • increase 36% for students who are Asian/Pacific Islander • increase 17% for students who are American Indian/Alaska Native HE student demographics (2010 to 2020) • flat for students who are White; American Indian/Alaska Native • increase 25% for students who are Black; • increase 46% for students who are Hispanic; • increase 25% for students who are Asian/Pacific Islander 23
- 24. Consumer-Driven Education Demand for anywhere, anytime learning: 10 Billion 1 Billion 2 Billion Mobile Devices Tweets/week Videos per day on YouTube 24
- 25. Macro Forces andPolicy K-12 Postsecondary • Common Core State Standards • Emphasis on college completion and • Common state assessments “gainful employment” • Student growth monitoring and • Shifting finance models in response engagement to decreased state funding (Obama efficiency demand) • Teacher and principal effectiveness • SROI of remediation • Statewide P-20 data systems • Instructor effectiveness • Individualized Learning Plans • Student “recovery” RttT “carrot” … Waiver “carrot/stick” … ESEA “stick” 25
- 26. State policy &individualized student learning
- 27. Strong Message: Personalize Learning Hobsons 2011 P-20 Summit “No org has been able to successfully assemble data to facilitate the career- education trajectory” “Too many students see $ as THE roadblock to postsecondary ed” “TurboTax or Mint.com for ed decision-making” “Consistent solution throughout P-20 – sticky” “Enable students to start their HE path earlier, if ready…dual enrollment” [Sample Board Members: Ron Huberman, JB Buxton, Margot Rogers, Larry Leverett, Eric Fingerhut, Bob Ptachik, Andy Rotherham, Barbara O‟Brian] 27
- 28. Individualized Learning Plan The ILP and state policy: • 25 states & D.C. mandate ILPs • 3 states mandate a guidance framework (no formal planning document) • 22 states do not have a mandate, but – 9 provide ILP models – 13 provide a guidance framework for districts to use Hobsons ILP report: http://www.hobsons.com/education-trends/resource-center/industry-reports/ 28
- 29. Typical ILP Components • Academic Planning • Career Planning (career exploration, goal setting, resume builder) • Regular ILP updates/sharing/review (annually is most common) • Personal reflections • Personality and learning style assessments • Service learning capture • Link to learning support services • Portfolio 29
- 30. Best Practices forILP Implementation ILPs that engage students: • Emphasize the individual in the ILP – Student learns about own learning strengths and needs – Student has tools to explore academic, career and personal interests and to make goals – Student owns planning, learning and outcomes • Create a support team for each student – Parental/Guardian involvement – Involve all appropriate staff in planning process – Connect student to learning resources – Peer support 30
- 31. Future Trends Closer connection with SIS >> data analysis Beginning planning sooner >> 6th grade or earlier 31
- 32. Future Trends Develop curriculum around ILP development Planning process as tool for family engagement Every student >> a comprehensive support network 32
- 33.
- 34. How Does Florida‟sePEP Compare with Other States? Like other states, ePEP focuses on appropriate courses for graduation & career interests. Questions: • How do students gain ownership of their ePEP? • How are students encouraged to reach academically? • What are the mechanisms to promote parent/guardian involvement in this process? 34
- 35. Thank You! Todd Bloom Chief Academic Officer Hobsons tbloom@hobsons.com (952) 807-5345 @Todd_Bloom 35