Overview of the education market dynamics with publishers and content owners as the intended audience. Also of interest to private equity and other investors.
2. Introduction
Michael Cairns is a publishing and media executive with over 25 years experience in
business strategy, operations and technology implementation. As a business
executive, Mr. Cairns has successfully managed several troubled and under-
performing businesses, creating new business opportunities, developing new funding
sources and enhancing shareholder value for investors. His years spent as an
operating executive have largely been with brand-name publishing companies such
as Macmillan, Inc., Berlitz International, Wolters Kluwer Health, Reed Elsevier and
R.R. Bowker. As a consultant, Mr. Cairns has worked with clients as diverse as
AARP, Hewlett Packard, InterPublic Companies and Reed Elsevier with an emphasis
on business strategy, market development and corporate development.
His skills and experience include:
âȘ Business and corporate strategy development and implementation
âȘ Operations management and business transformation
âȘ Traditional and digital publishing and operations
âȘ Print-to-digital transformation and adoption of new business models
âȘ Software development and software services
Mr. Cairns holds an MBA (Finance) from Georgetown University and a BA from
Boston University. He has served on several boards and advisory groups including
the Association of American Publishers, Book Industry Study Group and the
International ISBN organization. Additionally, he has public and private company
board experience.
2
Michael Cairns
Information Media Partners
Strategy Consulting
New York, London, Melbourne
Tel: 908 938 4889
Michael.cairns@infomediapartners.com
Find me:
LinkedIn
3. Information Media Partners
Michael Cairns established Information Media Partners in 2006 as a boutique strategy
consulting firm focused on the information and education publishing segment. The work
conducted by the firm includes product development, corporate development, sales
management and corporate reorganizations. We work with established businesses, private
equity owners and potential acquirers.
Examples of our work include:
âȘ Reorganized and re-focused a $25 million software publishing company by aligning
business operations with client priorities; implementing internal collaboration tools and
project management standards; re-building executive team to focus on effective and
efficient management
âȘ Defined a new business strategy for a large non-profit association and advocacy group,
expanding their business model into global markets to exploit their core knowledge and
expertise across a broader market
âȘ Led an information technology capabilities review at a large international advertising
holding company. Completed over 200 interviews in 15 international offices and multiple
group focus sessions to define the operational âgapsâ between existing agency capabilities
and those necessary and important for client delivery by region
âȘ Completed a sales management effectiveness review for a global software company and
defined six key project initiatives to improve sales effectiveness, market development and
account management
We approach our client engagements in a standardized, logical manner which creates the best
environment to identify key business drivers, administrative and logistical road blocks and/or
product or market definition issues. Our investigative approach leads to better insights into
your businesses and supports the development of workable solutions and recommendations
for success.
Visit the Information Media Partners website for more information.
Sample Client List
5. K-12 market overview
âȘ Historically a large industry
exhibiting attractive and
stable growth
âȘ English language
instructional market is highly
concentrated
âȘ US market influenced by
periodic significant changes
in government policies
âȘ Growth shown minimal
impact of periodic economic
recessions over time except
during 2008-2013
5
An Immense Market
Over $600million spending power
14,000
Public School
Districts
5.7M
Personnel
$13B
Spent on
instructional
Materials
$60B
Spent on
computer
Equipment in 10
years
$607B
Spending
2008-2009
$618B
Spending
2012-2013
$679B
Spending
2015-16
$691B
Spending
2016-17
Based on National Center for Education Statistics (âNCESâ)
projections growth will 1-2% each of the next three years
6. K-12 market overview
âȘ US market spending on education surpassed $1.3T in 2014 (7.4% of GDP)
âȘ Renewed focus on outcomes and improvements. Legislative programs
include:
â No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
â Race to the Top (RTTT)
â Focus on outcomes will transform education through the convergence of content,
technology and delivery
âȘ Movement towards integrated educational approaches combining content,
assessment and services aligned to standards and student performance
â Schools will become more data driven supporting performance and assessment
âȘ Education providers must demonstrate capabilities in instructional design,
curriculum development, alignment to standards and delivery at scale to
drive efficiency
â Only companies with financial strength will be able to invest sufficiently to provide
integrated solutions
âȘ As the US economy continues to improve this will enable growth in budget
spending
6
8. Macro issues impacting k-12 education
âȘ Education in flux due to
fed government change
âȘ Expect states to drive
assessment and
standards
âȘ More students will fall
behind
âȘ Digital share of
supplemental and core
textbooks rising 4-5% per
year
âȘ Buying decisions for
digital often originate with
teachers
8
9. Core K-12 standards are in flux
âȘ States struggled to meet NCLB requirements
â Department of Education granted formal state waivers to
common core state standards
â Defined knowledge and skills students need to succeed
in college
â More than 43 of 50 states have adopted these standards:
spending on instructional materials, assessment
technologies, and professional development initiatives to
comply with the regulations
â Some states saw significant declines in student
performance requiring intervention
âȘ Current administration are revising/not enforcing
education standards
â Unclear direction and/or long term impacts
9
10. Societal issues impacting K-12 education
âȘ High level of research by schools/districts into
instructional integrity
â Continuation of quality creation and delivery of
educational materials
âȘ Curriculum and lesson plans
â Wave of start-ups moving to help education
professionals map and design new types of
curriculum
â Peer to peer marketplaces; teachers pay teachers
10
13. Course material development is complex
Development increasingly
driven by:
âȘ Products that are
proven effective by
scientifically based
research (SBR): no
child left behind
âȘ Demonstrate causal
relationship between a
specific educational
treatment and a specific
learning outcome
14. Annual Horizon Report 2017 - Themes
Themes and Ideas
âȘ Progressive learning requires culture
change
âȘ Learners are creators: marker places,
collaborative rooms, coding/robotics
âȘ Inter + multi discipline learning breaking
silos
âȘ Wide spread use/access of technology
doesnât create equal learning
environment
âȘ Continually measuring learning is
essential to performance improvement
âȘ Fluency in technology is not the same as
understanding it
âȘ Authentic learning is necessity â hands
on learning and teaching required
âȘ Schools incorporating data analytics and
critical thinking
âȘ Learning spaces must reflect new
approaches
14
Key Trends
Larger trends
âȘ Coding as the ânewâ literacy
âȘ Rise of STEM learning
âȘ Growing focus on measuring learning
âȘ Redesigned learning spaces
âȘ Creating cultures of innovation
âȘ Deeper learning approaches
Challenges
âȘ Authentic learning environments
âȘ Improved digital literacy
âȘ Rethinking the roles of teachers
âȘ Teaching computational thinking
âȘ The (societal) achievement gap
âȘ Sustaining innovation through leadership
change
Important developments
âȘ Makerspaces
âȘ Robotics
âȘ Analytics technologies
âȘ Virtual reality
âȘ A/R
âȘ The IOT
Source: 2018 Horizon Education Report
15. Student outcomes are substandard
âȘ Student
preparation for
education
success differs
markedly by
family
circumstances
and race
âȘ Student
success at
elementary/
secondary
school is
distributed
unevenly by
economics,
income,
geography and
race
16. The economic influence of education
âȘ 77 Million Students in US
â 19% of students canât
read
â 1.2M drop out of
school every year
â 80% of low income
students are behind
one grade level
â 13% of students have
disabilities
âȘ US Test rankings versus
rest of the world
â 20th in Reading
â 30th in Math
â 24th in Science
behind Latvia and
Slovakia
16
âȘ Estimated that each drop out costs the US
economy $200K in lost lifetime tax revenue
âȘ Over the next decade the U.S. will fall 3
million workers short of the 22 million
students with a college degree needed to
meet the demands of the workforce
âȘ Many drop outs show signs of dropping out in
6th and 7th grade.
17. K-12 school districts
17
14,000
Public School
Districts
90,000
Public Schools
7,000
Charter
Schools
30,000
Private &
Parochial
Schools
Growth drivers:
birthrate and
migration
West & South
growing
NE, Midwest
Flat/no growth
215,000
District Personnel
3.5M
School Personnel
120,000
School Personnel
500,000
School Personnel
14,000
Public School
Districts:
70% educate less
than 2,500 students
25 largest educate
10% of total students
18. K-12 Enrollment
âȘ Increased 3%
between 2001 and
2004
âȘ Projected to increase
2% 2014-2026
âȘ 3.4M student
graduations in 2018
rising to 3.6M in
2025 but falls to
3.2M in 2032
18
19. Total public and private high school graduates by
race/ethnicity
19
Source: Inside Higher Ed.
20. Funding sources for K-12
Federal sources of funding:
âȘ Title 1 Grants
âȘ IDEA special education state
grants
Expenditures per pupil
âȘ $11,984 in 2016-17
âȘ Rise 1% per year through 2024-25
âȘ 2018 Federal funding bills
increased grants
School construction budgets expected
to grow from $50B in 2016 to $65B in
2019
âȘ 56% of schools completed
construction projects in 2016
âȘ 53% plan for construct in 2017
âȘ 53% of all schools require updating
and investment for repairs and
modernization
21. Funding sources for K-12
Public education funding
comes from three main
sources:
âȘ State funds: 46%
âȘ Local funds: 45%
âȘ Federal funds: 9%
Allocations to schools
generally made student
population
Property tax and local tax
revenues drive budgets
Source: National Association of State Budget Directors
23. Adoption States
âȘ 19 states have education
budgets administered and
implemented by the state board
of education and the state
department of education
âȘ Indiana (2011) and Arkansas
(2013) recently repealed their
state adoption statutes
âȘ Some states require publishers
of state-adopted materials to use
a central in-state depository or to
ship state-adopted materials
from within the state
âȘ Depositories charge publishers a
commission, typically about 8
percent of sales
âȘ In other states publishers may
ship directly to schools from their
own in-state warehouse, without
going through a central
depository
23
24. Adoption state criteria
âȘ 19 states use adoption for review and approval of K-12
textbooks, other core materials, related ancillary tools and
resources
âȘ Core curriculum materials align with state academic standards
and meet various state regulators (binding materials and
paper)
âȘ Some states allow a percent of funds (30%) to be used to
purchase materials not on the list
âȘ Complex set of policies, procedures, rules and timelines that
have been optimized for textbooks
âȘ After civil war, southern states pressured northern publishers
to product textbooks customized to meet their requirements in
the south
âȘ Distributor agreements â old days everything was slow
âȘ $7B spent annually on textbooks - $2.2B in adoption states
24
25. The importance of adoption states
âȘ Large state adoptions in BASAL courses will materially impact
textbook profitability
âȘ Most large scale BASAL adoptions cycle every 3-7 years
27. Growth and development of e-Content
âȘ Digital platforms and white
boards enabling schools to
modernize delivery
âȘ Single platform preferred
âȘ Federal & State digital initiatives
are driving adoption
âȘ Escalating growth in Fed/state
legislation funding digital
âȘ Parents, teachers and students
are demanding more hybrid
solutions: supplemental content
with BASAL fundamentals
âȘ Shift to digital platforms and
performance based learning is
creating data needs,
requirements and capabilities
from vendors
âȘ Vendors are required to prove
efficacy of their digital products
27
28. Changing dynamics for text materials
âȘ Why print still dominant?
â School readiness, infrastructure
requires modernization
â Require equality of access for all
students â creates lowest common
denominator
â Teachers uncomfortable with
technology
â Changing business models will erode
textbook market further
âȘ SaaS model for content sales
developing as a business model
âȘ State reviewers may not be expert in
reviewing technology based content
â impediment to adoption
âȘ Many unique forms of technology
are not bound by current policy,
form, procedures â process is
optimized for print formats
28
Source: Experts Guide to K-12 published by SIIA Source: Simba Information E-textbooks in Education
29. Digital change is forecast
âȘ Alignment to education
standards sometimes difficult
with technology based
products
âȘ Content/additions/substitutions
â some states donât allow
replacement or upgrades and
linking to additional materials
or make requirements to do so
is very difficult
âȘ Some states reconsidering the
requirement for state
depositories: May become
hard to justify given growing
costs
âȘ Some states offer exemptions
for e-products
Source: Curriculum for School Networking
Source: Experts Guide to K-12 published by SIIA
30. K-12 open education resources
âȘ Peer to Peer
âmarketplacesâ for
teachers and
administrators
âȘ Bridge gap between
âofficialâ content and
more up-to-date,
innovative solutions
âȘ Business opportunity
for teachers
30
31. Personal learning and performance
âȘ Innovation
â Adaptive software
â Collaborative learning spaces and ability to
use/incorporate MM into work
â Diversity of content
â Credible reliable databases to advance
learning
â Simulations/animations/virtual worlds
â Flexible teachers and methods
âȘ K-12
â Closing the achievement gap requires
differentiated learning
â Tools allow for individual learning plans
â Teachers provide progress monitoring and
intervention as needed
â Personal online work spaces
â Learning management systems delivery
course materials in real time and
asynchronously to students
âȘ Assessment
â Real time data â track projects,
achievement
â Personal portfolios
â Adaptive and diagnostic assessment tools
31
32. Example of learning activities
âȘ Supplemental publishing
market includes:
â Instructional workbooks,
study aids, digital video
products, e-learning, online,
and other computer-based
systems that enhance
traditional in-school
learning.
âȘ Drivers:
â Product ease of use
â High levels of technical
infrastructure
â Common core standards
â Federal sponsored internet
connectivity programs
32
39. Digital assessment tools in class
âȘ Digital tools face
credibility test
âȘ Trends point to
more use and
more acceptance
of assessment
tools
âȘ Education
âcommunityâ
seeking more
effective outcomes
40. Assessment market growth
âȘ Assessment
market will outpace
other segments of
the k-12 content
market
âȘ Ed-tech investment
is chasing new
companies in this
space
41. Growing need for more teachers
âȘ Demographic
movements
âȘ Teachers less
than 3yrs
experience are
dropping out
âȘ Poor pay, poor
materials, other
opportunities
âȘ Rural vs metro
divide
43. What is âEd-techâ?
âȘ The intersection of technology tools and
education content
â Data analytics platforms
â Content and other marketplaces
â User generated tools and applications
âȘ To provide access to information and learning to
obtain skills and knowledge
âȘ In other words â the application of technology to
support learning
43
44. E-Tech products and markets
âȘ Emerging K-12 Ed-tech markets are frequently ill
defined and highly fragmented
âȘ Product offerings are relatively undifferentiated
(and sometimes difficult to understand)
âȘ Few companies have sales forces of any size
âȘ District purchasing processes evolve slowly and
sporadically
âȘ Technology at point of delivery remains uneven
44
45. Big picture trends â 2017 Horizon Report
One Year or
Less
âȘ Bring your own
device
âȘ Learning analytics
âȘ Adaptive learning
Two â Three
Years
âȘ Augmented and
virtual reality
âȘ Makerspaces
Four to Five
Years
âą Affective computing
âą Robotics
Investment money has accelerated in the past five years
chasing start-up opportunities but may have reached
saturation.
45
50. Product segments in Ed-tech
âȘ Learning management
systems
âȘ Early childhood education
âȘ Broad online learning
programs
âȘ Enterprise learning
âȘ Next gen schools
âȘ Tech schools
âȘ Online to offline
âȘ Testing & remediation
âȘ Digital course materials
and courseware
âȘ Test prep
âȘ Curriculum production
âȘ Search
âȘ School administration
âȘ Next gen study tools
âȘ Language learning
50
52. Ed-tech/education business drivers
âȘ The internet ânetwork effect:â enables accessibility to
vast collections of education materials
âȘ Technology has facilitated ânew learning modelsâ which
had redefined how students integrate learning into work
and personal development
âȘ Expanding life-time earning âgapâ of those educated at
higher levels supports the value of education
âȘ Broader workflow automation is eliminating old-line
employment paths causing acceleration in worker âre-
educationâ needs and requirements
âȘ Rapid growth of non-English markets for education
content âtechnology leapâ embedding technology
52
53. Implications for educational content producers
The results of the Edweek
Market Brief suggest that more
than 70 percent of
administrators expect their
investments in educational
technology to grow over the
next year. Google will almost
certainly continue to soak up
the largest share of those
additional dollars.
Edweek Market brief special report â May 8, 2017
53
54. Thoughts on trends impacting Ed-tech
âȘ Traditional content
âȘ Access models
âȘ Platforms
âȘ Accreditation
âȘ New technology
54
55. End of traditional content?
âȘ Open educational course materials
âȘ Textbook form factor eroding
âȘ Battle for attention
âȘ âentrepreneur cultureâ forcing a rethinking of the
entire educational experience
âȘ Online vs offline â generational shift
55
56. Access models
âȘ Flattening of supply chain â enabling direct relationships
âȘ But, complicated with more platforms, distributors,
outlets, etc.
âȘ Business model transition from âone offâ sale to varieties
of subscription models is difficult
âȘ Publishers need to rely on direct relationships wherever
they can
âȘ Subscriptions/memberships assume higher engagement
with customer
âȘ âOn the verge of learning about your consumers
intimately. Need to wake up to this and learn from thisâ
âȘ Institutional sales (B2B and B2B2C) more predictable
56
57. Platform wars
âȘ xml first workflows
âȘ Mobile: Apple vs
Android
âȘ Bring your own device
âȘ Functionality
âȘ International markets
âȘ Acquisitions and roll-
ups: beach heads are
valuable
âȘ Dependence on
hardware and/or good
connectivity is likely to
fail â lowest common
denominator may be
very low
57
Edweek Market brief special report â May 8, 2017
58. Changing accreditation and degrees
âȘ Work experience
âȘ Badges and certifications
âȘ Changing test and assessment requirements
âȘ On demand, in situ learning needs for career
advance
âȘ Life long learning
58
59. New technology
âȘ Virtual reality
â Interesting for distance and/or remote users
â In class headset is potentially a distraction
âȘ Augmented reality
â Significant opportunity in education and career
development
â Turning 2D drawings into 3D models which can be
played with
â Non-headset on the way?
âȘ Makerspaces
59
60. Google retains significant advantage
âȘ âImage you have been
asked to hire one of
the following
companies to improve
student achievementâ
Edweek Market brief special report â May 8, 2017
61. How do you expect your spending to change?
Edweek Market brief special report â May 8, 2017
62. And spending over the next five years?
Edweek Market brief special report â May 8, 2017
72. The bulk of this material was created as
part of an âenvisioningâ session with a
client to foster a further discussion about
business strategy.
Michael Cairns
Managing Partner
Michael.Cairns@InfoMediaPartners.com
908 938 4889
LinkedIn
72