Biofilm is a microbial community characterized by cells attached to a surface and embedded in an extracellular matrix. Biofilms form in root canals and on materials placed in root canals. They are resistant to disinfection and prevent healing. Sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and MTAD are used to eradicate biofilms, but they often persist. Advanced techniques like lasers, photodynamic therapy, and ultrasound improve disinfection but sometimes biofilms still remain.
2. Biofilm is defined as a sessile multi cellular microbial
community characterized by cells that are firmly
attached to a surface and embedded in a self produced
matrix of extracellular polymeric substances
Biofilms are formed whenever there is free flow of fluid ,
microorganisms and a solid surface. It is one of the
basic survival strategies employed by bacteria
3. Characteristics of biofilm
Biofilms should possess
1. autopoiesis- ability to self organize
2. homeostasis-resist environmental
pertubations
3.synergy- effective in association than in
isolation
4.community- respond to environmental
changes as a unit rather than single individual
4. Biofilm protects residing bacteria from environmental
threats
Structure of biofilm traps nutrients
Displays internal compartmentalization-allows bacterial
species with different growth requirements to survive
Communicate and exchange genetic materials
5. Ultrastructure of a biofilm
Water channels help in exchange of materials between the
cells
6.
7. Ultrastructure of a biofilm
Basic structure of a biofilm- heterogenous arrangement
of microbial cells on a solid surface
Glycocalyx matrix made up of extrapolymeric substance
surrounds the microcolonies and anchors the bacterial
cell to the substrate
85% of biofilm is made up of matrix and 15% by cells
A fully hydrated biofilm appears like a mushroom shape/
tower shape
Water channels are primitive circulatory system in
biofilms
8. How biofilm forms
First stage of biofilm involves the adsorption of
macromolecules in the planktonic phase to surface- a
conditioning film forms- (transport of microbe to the
substrate surface)
Second stage – adhesion and co-adhesion of
microbes and attachment strengthened by polymer
production and unfolding of cell surface structures-
(initial non-specific microbial-substrate adherence
phase)
Third stage involves the multiplication and metabolism
of attached microorganisms -(bacterial growth and
biofilm expansion)
Fourth stage involves detachment of biofilm micro
9. Stages of biofilm formation
Recognition between a
suspended cell and a cell
already attached to substratum-
co-adhesion
Genetically distinct cells
recognize and clump together-
10. Factors influencing biofilm formation
PH, temperature, surface energy of substrate, flow rate
of fluid, nutrient availability, bacterial growth stage,
surface hydrophobicity
11.
12.
13. Detachment of biofilm- seeding dispersal
Erosion- continous detachment of single cells
and
small portions of biofilm
Sloughing- rapid massive loss of biofilm
14. Bacterial talk in biofilms
Communications between bacterial cells residing in a
biofilm is attained through signaling molecules by a
process called as quorum sensing
Quorum sensing is mediated by low molecular weight
molecules- autoinducers
Qs leads to
Exchange of genetic materials between species
Antibiotic resistance
Nutrient breakdown
Xenobiotic metabolism
Coordinated behaviour of biofilm
18. Endodontic biofilms
Endodontic biofilms are less diverse than oral microbiota
Root canal environment is more anaerobic
Microbes persist in isthmuses, deltas and apical parts of
root canal system- so complete disinfection is not
possible
Endodontic films are categorized in to
1.intracanal biofilm
2.extraradicular biofilm
3.periapical biofilm
4.biomaterial centered infection
19. ENDODONTIC BIOFILM FORMATION
First, there is penetration of the organism in the pulp where it
attaches and spreads further along the root canal.
Possibly, it is after biofilm formation that the infectious
process gains sufficient power to cause subsequent
destruction of the pulpal tissue. At some point in the
breakdown process, however, a steady state is reached
where the bacterial mass is held up by host defense
mechanisms.
The demarcation zone may be inside the root canal near the
root canal exit, at the foramen, or, as demonstrated by
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), on the external root
surface near the exit of the foramen to the periapical tissue
20. Intracanal Biofilm
Forms on root canal
dentin of an infected
tooth
Identified by Nair 1987
Cocci, rods , filaments
and spirochetes are
seen
Morphologically distinct
type of bacteria are seen
Eg- E faecalis
Characteristic bacteria-
dentine wall relationship
Distinct pattern of
organization of microbes
21. Extraradicular biofilms
Root surface biofilms-
formed adjacent to root apex
of endodontically treated
teeth
Found in teeth with
asymptomatic periapical
periodontitis and chronic
apical abscess with sinus
tract
Multispecies in nature- F.
nucleatum, Po. gingivalis,
and Tannerella forsythensis
Dominated by cocci and
short rods with cocci
attached to tooth substrate
Calcified extraradicular
Calcified films lead to
delayed periapical healing
22. Periapical biofilms
Isolated biofilms in the
periapical area of
endodontically involved
teeth
Eg- actiomycosis
P. propionicum
The aggregation
of Actinomyces cells is
influenced by pH, ionic
strength, and cell
concentration which
facilitates biofilm formation
23. Biomaterial centered biofilm
Bacteria adheres to
artificial biomaterial
surface and forms biofilms
Usually reveals
opportunistic invasion by
nosocomial organisms
Eg- coagulase negative
staphylococcus, s. aureus,
enterococci, streptococci,
p.aeruginosa
A-Microbial film on
guttapercha
B-E. feacalis on film
serum plays a significant role
in biofilm formation
24. Biomaterial centered infection
Bacterial adherence to a biomaterial surface is also
described in three phases:
Phase 1: Transport of bacteria to biomaterial surface,
Phase 2: Initial non-specific adhesion phase, and
Phase 3: Specific adhesion phase.
E. faecalis, Str.
sanguinis, Streptococcusintermedius, Streptococcus
pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus form biofilm on GP
points.
F. nucleatum, Propionibacterium acnes, Po. gingivalis,
and Pr. intermedia do not form biofilm on Gutta-
Percha(GP) points.
25.
26.
27. Eradication Of Biofilms
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
Effective against biofilms containing p.intermedia,
peptostreptococcus micros, s.intermedius and
fusobacterium
Disrupts oxidative phosphorylation and inhibits DNA
synthesis of bacteria
The antibacterial effectiveness and tissue dissolution
capacity of aqueous hypochlorite is a function of its
concentration, and so is its toxicity
Fresh hypochlorite consistently reaches the canal system,
and concentration of the solution may thus not play a
decisive role
28. One of the methods to improve the efficacy of sodium
hypochlorite was to use heated solution. This improves
their immediate tissue-dissolution capacity.
Ultrasonic activation of sodium hypochlorite has also
been advocated, as this would “accelerate chemical
reactions, create cavitational effects, and achieve a
superior cleansing action”
29. CHLORHEXIDINE DIGLUCONATE
Effective against gram positive and gram negative
bacteria
Denatures bacterial cell wall causes leakage of
intracellular organisms
Substantivity effect
Eg- e. fecalis
IODINE
Bactericidal, fungicidal, virucidal and sporicidal
Attacks proteins , nucleotides and fatty acids resulting in
cell death
30. Despite its usefulness as a final irrigant, chlorhexidine cannot be
advocated as the main irrigant in standard endodontic cases,
because (a) chlorhexidine is unable to dissolve necrotic tissue
remnants, and (b) chlorhexidine is less effective on Gram-negative
than on Gram-positive bacteria
31.
32. Eradication Of Biofilms
EDTA
Extracts bacterial proteins by combining with cell envelope
proteins and results in bacterial cell death
Inhibits growth of bacteria and ultimately destroys them by
starvation
EDTA chelates with metallic ions. Chelators may detach
biofilms adhering to root canal walls. An alternating irrigating
regimen of NaOCl and EDTA may be more efficient in
reducing bacterial loads in root canal systems than NaOCl
alone
TETRACLEAN
More effective than MTAD against E. faecalis
Contains cetrimide for antimicrobial properties
35. CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
Ineffective in killing E. feacalis on its own
Effective when combined with 2% chx
Combination completely eliminates E. faecalis
ULTRASONIC ACTIVATED IRRIGATION
Improves root canal cleaning and shaping- isthmus and
deltas cleaning
OZONE
Ozone in 0.1-0.3 ppm is able to kill bacteria after 15- 30 mins
of contact time
37. LASERS
Induce thermal effect producing an alteration in the bacterial
cell wall- change in the osmotic gradients and cell death
ER- YAG irradiation reduces the number of viable cells
Eg- A. naeslundi, E feacalis, P. acnes, F. nucleatum
PHOTOACTIVATED DISINFECTION
Combination of photosensitizer solution and low power laser
light
Photosensitizer selectively accumulated in the target cell is
activated by a visible light of appropriate wave length
ENDOACTIVATOR SYSTEM- debrides deep lateral anatomy ,
removes smear layer and dislodges simulated biofilm
38. Biofilm Detection
The forces of interaction among bacterial cells and
between bacterial cells and substrates has been studied
by atomic force microscopy –AFM
Micromanipulators have been used to sample individual
cells or biofilm compartments.
Laser-based optical tweezers are noninvasive and non-
contact tools that can probe the interaction between
microscopic objects such as bacteria and collagen.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is used
to characterize the chemical composition of mature
biofilm structures qualitatively and quantitatively.
39. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a
powerful analytical tool to study the constituents of
bacterial biofilm, as well as to obtain metabolic
information in planktonic cells, adherent bacterial cells,
and in situ biofilm bacteria
Recent advances in micromanipulator-assisted analysis,
green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagging, confocal laser
scanning microscopy (CLSM), flow cytometry, and
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have made
biofilm characterization very comprehensive.