The document outlines the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, which aims to identify and predict the effects of projects on the environment and human health. It describes various methodologies for conducting EIA, including initial environmental examinations, full-scale assessments, and specific methods such as checklist and matrix approaches. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of public involvement and the role of environmental management plans in mitigating negative impacts.

1. EIA

2. • EIA: an activity designed to identify and predict the
impact of project on biogeophysicochemical
environment and on human health so as to
recommend appropriate legislative measures,
programs and operational procedures to minimize
the impacts.

3. Silent features of EIA
a) EIA identifies possible positive and negative
impacts to the environment resulting from
proposed project. These impacts are identifies
over short term and long term time frame.
b) EIA provides plans which upon implementation,
will reduce the negative impacts of a project
c) EIA provides monitoring programme which
involves measurement of level of
implementation and degree of effectiveness of
environmental protection provisions.

5. EIA procedure
1.The Initial Environmental Examination(IEE)
• reviewing the environmental integrity of project to help to
determine whether or not EIA level studies can be carried out.
• Involves assessing the potential environmental effects of
proposed project that can be carried out with very limited budget
and will be based on the available recorded information or on the
professional judgment of expert.
• If IEE indicates that full scale EIA is not required then any
environmental management parameters such as environmental
protection measures or a monitoring programme can be adapted
to complete the EIA for such a project.

6. 2.The full scale Environmental Impact
Assessment(EIA)
• A multidisciplinary approach to environmental impact
analysis is crucial to the decision making process and
to an equal consideration of all areas of potential
impacts.
• Impact assessment methods are classified into
following analytical functions: scope, identification,
prediction and evaluation
• Important steps in EIA
1. Defining Scope of EIA
2. Identification
3. Prediction
4. Impact evaluation and analysis

7. 1.Scoping:
• Scoping process should be specifically designed to suit the
needs of the individual project or action being proposed. It
can be formal, extensive or informal, simple process.
• Scoping is used to-
• Define proposed action
• Enlist cooperation agencies
• Identify what’s important
• Identify what’s not important
• Set time limit on studies
• Determine requirement of study team
• Collect background information
• Identify required permit
• Determine the range of alternatives

8. 2.Identification of impacts on environment by
preliminary overview assessment:
• Several steps are included in overview, first the
project alternatives and characteristics must be
reviewed.
• The purpose of preliminary assessment is to
identify the potential for significant
environmental impacts of the initial set of
alternatives. Results then refine for the
alternatives .

9. 3.Classification and prediction of impacts:
• Environment impacts of any developmental
activity fall into three categories:
1. Direct impact
2. Indirect impact
3. Cumulative impact
These three groups can be further broken down
according to their nature
• Positive and negative
• Random and predictable
• Local and widespread impacts
• Short and long term impacts

10. 4.Impact evolution and analysis
• The purpose of an environment impact evolution and
analysis is to comparatively evaluate alternative
courses of action. It involves-
• Identifying major activities
• Selecting environmental components
• Selecting types of impacts
• Assessing the possibilities and or probabilities of
occurrences
• Determining the degree and time frame of impacts
• Designating impacts as positive ,neutral or negative

11. EIA methodologies:
• Each of different methodologies for the assessment of
environmental impacts of development of projects have their
advantages and disadvantages and their utility for a particular
application is largely a matter of choice and judgment of the
analyst.
• Each technique and method for evaluation should have the
following qualities and characteristics:
• It should be systematic in approach
• It should be able to organize a large mass of heterogeneous
data
• It should be able to quantify the impacts
• It should be capable of summarizing the data
• it should have good predictive capability
• It should extract silent features
• It should finally be able to display the raw data and the
derived information in a meaningful fashion.

12. Criteria for selection of EIA methodology
1. General:
a) Simplicity-should be simple so that available manpower with
limited background knowledge can grasp and adopt it without
much difficulty
b) Manpower time and budget constraints-should be applied by
small group with limited budget and under time constraints.
c) Flexibility-should be flexible enough to allow for necessary
modifications

13. 2. Impact identification:
a) Comprehensiveness-should be sufficiently
comprehensive to contain all possible options and
alternatives
b) Specificity-should identify specific parameters on
which there would be significant impacts
c) Isolation of project impacts-methodology should
suggest procedures for identifying project impacts
d) Timing and duration-methodology should be able to
identify accurately the location and extent of the
impacts on a temporal scale

14. 3. impact measurement
a) Commensurate units-methodology should have a
commensurate(similar measurable standard) set of
units so that comparison can be made between
alternatives and criteria
b) Explicit indicators-methodology should suggest
specific and measurable indicators to qualify
impacts on the relevant environmental parameters
c) Magnitude-methodology should provide for the
measurement of impact magnitude, defined as
degree of extensiveness of scale of impact
d) Objective criteria-it should be based on objective
criteria and the criteria should be stated explicity.

15. 4.Impact interpretation and evaluation
a) Significance-methodology should be able to assess the
significance of measured impacts on a local, regional and national
scale.
b) Explicit criteria-the criteria and assumptions employed to
determine the impact significance should be explicitly stated.
c) Uncertainty-uncertainty of possible impacts is a very real problem
in environmental impact assessment. The methodology should be
able to take this aspect into account.
d) Risk-the methodology should identify impacts that have low
probability of occurrence but a high potential for damage and
loss.
e) Depth of analysis-the conclusion derived from methodology
should be able to provide sufficient depth of analysis .
f) Alternative comparison-it should provide a sufficiently detailed
and complete comparison of the various alternatives readily
available for the project under study.
g) Public involvement-methodology should suggest a mechanism for
public involvement in the interpretation of the impacts and the
significance

16. 5.Impact communication:
a) Affected parties-methodology should provide mechanism
for linking impacts to specific effected geographical or
social groups.
b) Setting description-it should provide description of the
project setting to aid the users in developing overall
perspective.
c) Summary format-should provide the results of the impact
analysis summarized in a format that will give users
sufficient details to understand it and have confidence in
its assessment
d) Key issues-should provide a format for highlighting the key
issues and impacts identified in the analysis.
e) Compliance-whether it is able to comply with the terms of
reference established by the controlling agency.

17. EIA methods:
• List of environment EIA methods
1. Adhoc methods
2. Checklist methods
3. Matrices methods
4. Networks methods
5. Overlay methods
6. Environmental index using factor analysis
7. Cost/benefit analysis
8. Predictive or simulation methods

18. • 1.Adhoc methods:
• Adhoc methods indicate broad areas of possible impacts by listing
composite environmental parameters likely to be affected by any
development.
• In this method each environmental area such as air, water is taken
separately and the nature of impacts such as short term or long term
,reversible or irreversible are considered.
• Adhoc methods are the rough assessment of total impacts and the general
nature of these possible impacts.
• In adhoc methods assessor relies on intuitive approach and makes a broad
based qualitative assessment.
• This method serves as preliminary assessment.
• Adhoc method while being very simple can be performed without any
training which gives information of projects effects on environment
without any sort off relative weighting or any cause effect relationship.
• It provides minimal guidance for impact analysis while suggesting broad
areas of possible impacts.
• Ad hoc method is useful when time constraints and lack of required
information and EIA must rely on expert opinion.
• When more scientific methods are available, it is not recommended.

19. • Drawbacks of adhoc method:
a) It gives no assurance that it encompasses a
comprehensive set of all relevant impacts.
b) It lacks consistency in analysis as it may select different
criteria to evaluate different groups of factors.
c) It is inherently inefficient, as it requires a considerable
efforts to identify and assemble as appropriate panel for
each assessment.
Because of these drawbacks it is not recommended as
ad method for impact analysis. it is after all ad hoc
method and has utility only when other methods can
not be used for lack of expertise, resources and other
necessities.

20. • Advantages:
• Specialist on particular area will provide
guidance.
• Disadvantages:
• It requires experts.
• Short/long term impacts are examined on guess
basis.
• Identification, prediction and interpretation of
impacts are quite poor.

21. 2.Checklist methodologies
• It involves listing of environmental factors in
highly structured approaches involving
importance weightings for factors and
application of scaling techniques for impacts
of each alternative on each factors.
• Checklists in general are strong in impact
identification.

22. • Categories of checklist:
1. Simple checklist: a list of parameters without guidelines provided
on how to interpret and measure an environmental parameter.
2. Descriptive checklist: includes identification of environmental
parameters and guidelines on how parameter data are to be
measured.
3. Scaling checklist: similar to descriptive checklist with the addition
of information basis to subjective scaling or parameter value.
4. Scaling weighting checklist: are capable of qualifying impacts
• Drawbacks of checklist:
1. They require large amount of information about the
environmental components and project activities
2. Weights are assigned to environmental components and
consequently to impacts without any guarantee that such weight
and will represent the actual impacts that will be apparent once
the project is implemented and operational.

24. • Advantages:
• Simple to understand and use.
• Good for site selection and priority setting.
• Disadvantages:
• Do not distinguish between direct and indirect
impacts.
• Do not link action and impact.

25. 3.Matrix methods:
• In matrix method interaction between various
activities and environmental parameters will be
identified and evaluated.
• Matrix methods are basically generalized
checklist where one dimension of matrix is a list
of environmental social and economic factors
likely to be affected by project activity.
• Matrices provides cause –effect between the
various project activities and their impacts on the
numerous environmentally important sectors.

26. The purpose of matrix is to help the project
planner to :
• Identify specific sources of potential
environmental impacts
• Provide means of comparing the predicted
environmental impacts of various project
options available

29. • Advantages:
• Link action to impact
• Good method for displaying EIA results.
• Disadvantages:
• Difficult to distinguish direct and indirect
impacts.
• Qualitative method.

30. 4.Network method:
• Networks are capable of identifying direct and indirect
impacts, higher order effects and interaction between
impacts, and are able to identify and incorporate mitigation
and management measures into the planning stages of
project.
• They are suitable for expressing ecological impacts but of
lesser utility in considering social, human and aesthetic
aspects.
• To develop a network a series of questions related to each
project activity must be answered. In developing network
diagram the first step is to identify the first order changes in
environmental components. The secondary changes in other
environmental components that will result from first order
changes will then be identified. This process will be
continued until thee network diagram is completed to the
experts satisfaction.

31. • Features of network method:
1. Network analysis are particularly useful for understanding the
relationship between environmental components that produce
higher order impacts, which are often overlooked in some major
projects.
2. Networks can also aid in organizing the discussion of anticipated
project impacts.
3. Network displays are useful in communicating information about
an environmental impact study to an interested public.
• Limitations:
1. Minimal information provided on the technical aspects of impact
prediction.
2. Networks can become visually very complicated.
3. Networks generally consider only adverse impacts on the
environment and hence decision making in terms of the cost and
benefit of a development project to a region is not feasible by
network analysis.

33. • Advantages:
• Link action to impact
• Handles direct and indirect impact
• Disadvantages:
• Qualitative

34. • 5.Overlay methods
• Overlay method involves preparation of a set of transparent
maps, which represent the spatial distribution of an
environmental characteristics.
• To evaluate the degree of associated impacts many project
alternatives can be located on the final map and validity of
assessment will be related to type and number of parameter
chosen.
• The number of parameters that can be overlayed in a
transparency map is limited to 10.
• Overlays are useful when addressing questions of site and
route selection.
• There is no provision for quantification and measurement of
impacts .

36. • Advantages:
• Easy to understand and use
Good display method
Good for site selection
Disadvantages:
Address only direct impact
Do not address impact duration or probability.

37. • An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is a
document prepared to describe the effects for
proposed activities on the environment.
• Preparation of environmental management plan
is required for formulation, implementation and
monitoring of environmental protection
measures during and after commissioning of
projects. The plans should indicate the details as
to how various measures have been or are
proposed to be taken including cost components
as may be required.

38. • The management plans should be necessarily based on
considerations of resource conservation and pollution abatement,
some of which are:
• Liquid Effluents
• Air Pollution
• Solid Wastes
• Noise and Vibration
• Occupational Safety and Health
• Prevention,maintenance and operation of Environment Control
Systems
• House-Keeping
• Human Settlements
• Transport Systems
• Recovery - reuse of waste products
• Vegetal Cover
• Disaster Planning
• Environment Management Cell

39. Role of CPCB,SPCB
• The existing national EC process does not involve CPCB
at any stage or level. However, discussions with IA
Division officials of MoEF reveals that the technical and
sector-specific expertise available among the staff of
various divisions of CPCB is being put to good use by
drafting them into the Committee of Experts formed
under the provisions of Sub-para III, Para 2 of EIA
Notification, 1994.
• It seems from discussions with IA Division officials of
MoEF that it has become an informal practice to
appoint the Member Secretary or his representative of
CPCB in all the sector-specific Committee of Experts.

40. • SPCB Roles and Responsibilities in the National EC
Process
• The primary role of state pollution control boards
in the existing national level EC process consists
of the following three activities:
• Screening the project proposals;
• Issuance of No objection certificate; and
• Conduct of Public hearing and sending the
minutes of meeting to IA
• Division of MoEF.

41. Cost benefit analysis
• Provides the nature of expense and benefit
accruable from a project.
• Environmental economics can aid in the selection of projects
in that cost benefit analysis can be used in the prescreening
stage of project and the environmental components can be
brought into the process of presenting various options and
selecting among them.
• Cost benefit analysis is type of assessment of natural system
which is not more concerned with effects of environmental
quality but it seeks the conditions for sustainable use of the
natural resource in the region.

42. Environmental ethics
• Environmental ethics refers to the issues,
principles and guidelines relating to human
interactions with their environment.
• Environmental ethics can provide us the
guidelines for putting our beliefs into action
and help us decide what to do when faced
with crucial situations.

43. • some important ethical guidelines known as Earths ethics or
Environmental ethics as follows,
• You should love and honor the earth since it has blessed you
with life and governs you survival.
• You should not hold yourself above other living things and
have no right to drive them to extinction.
• You should be grateful to the plants and animals which
nourish you by giving you food.
• You should not waste your resources on destructive weapons.