DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT
PLANNINGPLANNING
FIVE YEAR PLANS
Leena Shankaranarayana
INDIAN ECONOMY
 WHAT GOODS AND SERVICES SHOULD BE
PRODUCED IN THE COUNTRY?
 HOW SHOULD THE GOODS AND SERVICES BE
PRODUCED? SHOULD PRODUCERS USE MORE
HUMAN LABOUR OR MORE CAPITAL (MACHINES)
FOR PRODUCING THINGS?
 HOW SHOULD THE GOODS AND SERVICES BE
DISTRIBUTED AMONG PEOPLE?
 A POLICY OF MIXED ECONOMY IS FOLLOWED IN
THE COUNTRY.
 IN A MIXED ECONOMY, THE PUBLIC SECTOR
ENTERPRISES (GOVERNMENT-OWNED) EXIST
ALONGSIDE THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO ACHIEVE
A SOCIALIST PATTERN OF SOCIETY IN A
WELFARE STATE.
WHAT IS A PLAN ?
 A PLAN SPELLS OUT HOW THE RESOURCES OF A
NATION SHOULD BE PUT TO USE.
 SOME GENERAL GOALS AS WELL AS SOME
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
 TO BE ACHIEVED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD
OF TIME
 IN INDIA PLANS ARE OF FIVE YEARS DURATION
 OUR PLAN DOCUMENTS SPECIFY THE
OBJECTIVES TO BE ATTAINED IN THE FIVE
YEARS OF A PLAN
 PLAN DOCUMENTS ALSO SPECIFY WHAT IS TO
BE ACHIEVED OVER A PERIOD OF TWENTY
YEARS. THIS LONG-TERM PLAN IS CALLED
‘PERSPECTIVE PLAN’.
 THE FIVE YEAR PLANS ARE SUPPOSED TO
PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR THE PERSPECTIVE
PLAN.
PLANNING IN INDIA
 PLANNING COMMISSION
 ESTABLISHED IN MARCH 1950
 A STATUTORY BODY WITH THE PRIME
MINISTER OF INDIA AS ITS CHAIRMAN
 SET UP TO FORMULATE BASIC
ECONOMIC POLICIES, DRAFT PLANS
AND WATCH ITS PROGRESS AND
IMPLEMENTATION.
 PT. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU WAS THE
FIRST CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru,
establishes a five-year plan for agricultural reform,
committing India to a socialist path to
development.
PLANNING IN INDIA
 NATIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
 AN ADVISORY BODY ATTACHED TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
 ESTABLISHED IN 1965.
 IT INCLUDES EXPERTS REPRESENTING A
CROSS-SECTION OF THE INDIAN ECONOMY.
 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
 ESTABLISHED IN 1951
 CMs OF THE STATES, TOGETHER WITH THE
MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
CONSTITUTE THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
COUNCIL.
 THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA PRESIDES OVER
THE COUNCIL.
FIVE YEAR PLANS
 THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE DRAWN BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH
INDIA'S ECONOMY ON A SOCIALISTIC
PATTERN IN SUCCESSIVE PHASES OF FIVE
YEAR PERIODS-CALLED THE FIVE YEAR
PLANS. IT CONSISTS OF:
 (I) PLANNING COMMISSION OF INDIA
 (II) NATIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
 (III) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND
STATE PLANNING COMMISSIONS
FIVE YEAR PLANS
 THE GOALS OF THE FIVE YEAR
PLANS ARE:
GROWTH
MODERNISATION
SELF-RELIANCE
AND EQUITY.
PRASANTA CHANDRA MAHALANOBIS :
THE ARCHITECT OF INDIAN PLANNING
FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN (1951-56)
 IN JULY 1951, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
ISSUED THE DRAFT OUTLINE OF THE FIRST
FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1951
TO MARCH 1956. IT WAS PRESENTED TO THE
PARLIAMENT IN DECEMBER 1952.
 IN THE FIRST PLAN, AGRICULTURE RECEIVED
THE MAIN THRUST, FOR SUSTAINING OF
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIES
WHICH WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT A
SIGNIFICANT RISE IN THE YIELD OF RAW
MATERIALS AND FOOD.
FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN (1951-56)
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) TO INCREASE FOOD PRODUCTION.
 II) TO FULLY UTILISE AVAILABLE RAW
MATERIALS.
 III) TO CHECK INFLATIONARY
PRESSURE.
 OUTLAY: THE TOTAL PROPOSED
OUTLAY WAS RS. 3,870 CRORE.
 IT WAS MORE THAN A SUCCESS,
BECAUSE OF GOOD HARVESTS IN THE
LAST TWO YEARS.
SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN (1956-61)
 ALSO CALLED MAHALANOBIS PLAN AFTER ITS
CHIEF-ARCHITECT.
 THE MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO LAUNCH
INDUSTRIALISATION AND STRENGTHEN THE
INDUSTRIAL BASE OF THE ECONOMY.
 IT WAS IN THIS LIGHT THAT THE 1948 INDUSTRIAL
POLICY RESOLUTION WAS REVISED AND A NEW
RESOLUTION OF 1956 WAS ADOPTED.
 THE SECOND PLAN STARTED WITH AN EMPHASIS ON
THE EXPANSION OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND AIMED
AT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SOCIALISTIC PATTERN
OF SOCIETY.
SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN (1956-61)
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) A SIZEABLE INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME SO
AS TO RAISE THE LEVEL OF LIVING.
 II) RAPID INDUSTRIALISATION OF THE COUNTRY
WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON THE
DEVELOPMENT OF BASIC AND KEY INDUSTRIES.
 OUTLAY: THE SECOND PLAN PROPOSED A TOTAL
PUBLIC SECTOR OUTLAY OF RS. 4,800 CRORES
THOUGH ACTUAL OUTLAY WAS ONLY RS. 4,672
CRORE.
 ADVOCATED HUGE IMPORTS WHICH LED TO
EMPTYING OF FUNDS LEADING TO FOREIGN LOANS.
IT SHIFTED BASIC EMPHASIS FROM AGRICULTURE TO
INDUSTRY FAR TOO SOON. DURING THIS PLAN, PRICE
LEVEL INCREASED BY 30%, AGAINST A DECLINE OF
13% DURING THE FIRST PLAN.
THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN (1961-66)
 IN THE THIRD PLAN, THE EMPHASIS
WAS ON LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT.
 THE THIRD PLAN REPORT STATED
THAT DURING THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD
CONCERNED, THE INDIAN ECONOMY
"MUST NOT ONLY EXPAND RAPIDLY
BUT, AT THE SAME TIME, BECOME
SELF-RELIANT AND SELF-
GENERATING."
THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN (1961-66)
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) AN INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME OF MORE THAN 5 PER
CENT ANNUALLY. THE INVESTMENT PATTERN LAID DOWN MUST
BE CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING THIS GROWTH RATE IN THE
SUBSEQUENT YEARS.
 II) AN INCREASE IN THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE AND TO
ACHIEVE SELF SUFFICIENCY BY INCREASING FOOD GRAIN
PRODUCTION.
 III) GREATER EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITIES, MORE EVEN
DISTRIBUTION OF ECONOMIC POWER AND REDUCING WEALTH
AND INCOME DISPARITIES.
 ALSO, IT WAS REALIZED FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF FIRST TWO
PLANS THAT AGRICULTURE SHOULD BE GIVEN THE TOP
PRIORITY TO SUFFICE THE REQUIREMENT OF EXPORT AND
INDUSTRY.
 COMPLETE FAILURE DUE TO UNFORESEEN MISFORTUNES, VIZ.
CHINESE AGGRESSION (1962), INDO-PAK WAR (1965), SEVEREST
DROUGHT IN 100 YEARS (1965-66).
THREE ANNUAL PLANS (1966-69)
 PLAN HOLIDAY FOR 3YEARS.
 THE PREVAILING CRISIS IN AGRICULTURE AND
SERIOUS FOOD SHORTAGE NECESSITATED THE
EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE DURING THE ANNUAL
PLANS.
 DURING THESE PLANS A WHOLE NEW
AGRICULTURAL STRATEGY INVOLVING WIDE-
SPREAD DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-YIELDING
VARIETIES OF SEEDS, THE EXTENSIVE USE OF
FERTILIZERS, EXPLOITATION OF IRRIGATION
POTENTIAL AND SOIL CONSERVATION WAS PUT
INTO ACTION TO TIDE-OVER THE CRISIS IN
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.
 DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS, THE ECONOMY
BASICALLY ABSORBED THE SHOCKS GIVEN
DURING THE THIRD PLAN, MAKING WAY FOR A
PLANNED GROWTH.
FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1969-74)
 AFTER THE ‘PLAN HOLIDAY', THE FOURTH PLAN
WAS BEGUN IN 1969.
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) TO ACHIEVE STABILITY AND PROGRESS
TOWARDS SELF-RELIANCE.
 II) TO ACHIEVE AN OVERALL RATE OF GROWTH
OF 5.7 PER CENT ANNUALLY.
 III) TO RAISE EXPORTS AT THE RATE OF 7 PER
CENT ANNUALLY.
 OUTLAY: THE TOTAL PROPOSED OUTLAY WAS
RS. 24,880 CRORE, WHICH INCLUDED RS. 15,900
CRORES AS PUBLIC SECTOR OUTLAY AND RS.
8,980 CRORE AS PRIVATE SECTOR OUTLAY.
FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1969-74)
 MAIN EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE'S
GROWTH RATE SO THAT A CHAIN
REACTION CAN START.
 FARED WELL IN THE FIRST TWO
YEARS WITH RECORD PRODUCTION,
LAST THREE YEARS FAILURE
BECAUSE OF POOR MONSOON.
 HAD TO TACKLE THE INFLUX OF
BANGLADESHI REFUGEES BEFORE
AND AFTER 1971 INDO-PAK WAR.
FIFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1974-79)
 THE PLAN WAS FORMULATED AGAINST THE
BACKGROUND OF SEVERE INFLATIONARY PRESSURE.
 THE FIFTH PLAN PREPARED AND LAUNCHED BY D.D.
DHAR PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE TWO MAIN OBJECTIVES
VIZ, 'REMOVAL OF POVERTY' (GARIBI HATAO) AND
'ATTAINMENT OF SELF RELIANCE', THROUGH PROMOTION
OF HIGH RATE OF GROWTH, BETTER DISTRIBUTION OF
INCOME AND A VERY SIGNIFICANT GROWTH IN THE
DOMESTIC RATE OF SAVINGS.
 OBJECTIVES: IN ADDITION TO REMOVAL OF POVERTY
AND ATTAINMENT OF SELF-RELIANCE, THE FIFTH PLAN
HAD THE FOLLOWING MAJOR OBJECTIVES.
 I) 5.5 PER CENT OVERALL RATE OF GROWTH IN GROSS
DOMESTIC OBJECTIVES.
FIFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1974-79)
 II) EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT
AND FULLER UTILISATION OF EXISTING SKILLS
AND EQUIPMENT.
 III) A NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR MINIMUM
NEEDS AND EXTENDED PROGRAMMES OF
SOCIAL WELFARE.
 OUTLAY: A TOTAL OUTLAY OF RS. 53,410 CRORE
WAS PROPOSED FOR THE FIFTH PLAN.

THE PLAN WAS TERMINATED IN 1978 (INSTEAD OF
1979) WHEN JANTA GOVT.CAME TO POWER.
SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1980-85)
 THE DRAFT OF THE SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1978-
1983) WAS PRESENTED IN 1978. HOWEVER, THE
PLAN WAS TERMINATED WITH THE CHANGE OF
GOVERNMENT IN JANUARY 1980. THE NEW SIXTH
FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS IMPLEMENTED IN APRIL 1980.
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) TO ELIMINATE UNEMPLOYMENT AND
UNDEREMPLOYMENT.
 II) TO RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING OF THE
POOREST OF MASSES.
 III) TO REDUCE DISPARITIES IN INCOME AND
WEALTH.
 OUTLAY: THE PROPOSED OUTLAY FOR THE SIXTH
PLAN TOTALLED RS. 1,58,710 CRORE.
SEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1985-90)
 THE DRAFT OF THE SEVENTH PLAN WAS APPROVED ON
NOVEMBER 9, 1985 BY THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
COUNCIL. THE PLAN WAS PART OF THE LONG-TERM
PLAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 15 YEARS.
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) DECENTRALISATION OF PLANNING AND FULL
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT.
 II) THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE GENERATION OF
PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT.
 III) REMOVAL OF POVERTY AND REDUCTION IN
INCOME DISPARITIES.
IT WAS A GREAT SUCCESS, THE ECONOMY RECORDED
6% GROWTH RATE AGAINST THE TARGETED 5%.
EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97)
 THE EIGHTH PLAN WAS POSTPONED BY TWO YEARS
BECAUSE OF POLITICAL UPHEAVALS AT THE CENTRE
AND IT WAS LAUNCHED AFTER A WORSENING BALANCE
OF PAYMENT POSITION AND INFLATION DURING 1990-91.
 THE EIGHTH PLAN PROPOSED A GROWTH RATE OF 5.6
PER CENT PER ANNUM ON AN AVERAGE DURING THE
PLAN PERIOD.
 THE EIGHTH PLAN FOCUSED ON CLEAR PRIORITISATION
OF SECTORS/PROJECTS FOR INVESTMENT IN ORDER TO
FACILITATE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY
INITIATIVES TAKEN IN THE AREAS OF FISCAL, TRADE
AND INDUSTRIAL SECTORS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT.
EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97)
 OBJECTIVES:
 I) GENERATION OF ADEQUATE EMPLOYMENT TO
ACHIEVE NEAR FULL EMPLOYMENT LEVEL BY THE
TURN OF THE CENTURY.
 II) CONTAINMENT OF POPULATION GROWTH
THROUGH PEOPLE'S ACTIVE CO-OPERATION AND
AN EFFECTIVE SCHEME OF INCENTIVES AND
DISINCENTIVES.
 III) UNIVERSALISATION OF ELEMENTARY
EDUCATION AND COMPLETE ERADICATION OF
ILLITERACY AMONG THE PEOPLE IN THE AGE
GROUP OF 15 TO 35 YEARS.
EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1992-97)
 SOME OF THE MAIN ECONOMIC
PERFORMANCES DURING EIGHTH
PLAN PERIOD WERE RAPID ECONOMIC
GROWTH, HIGH GROWTH OF
AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SECTOR,
AND MANUFACTURING SECTOR,
GROWTH IN EXPORTS AND IMPORTS,
IMPROVEMENT IN TRADE AND
CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT.
NINTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN (1997-2002)
 IT BEGAN ON APRIL 1, 1997. THE NINTH
PLAN WAS THE FIRST CONCRETE
ATTEMPT TO TRANSLATE THE
PROGRAMME OF ECONOMIC REFORMS
AND THE NEW ECONOMIC POLICY
WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF AN
INDICATIVE PLAN.
 THE APPROACH PAPER TO THE NINTH
PLAN (1997-2002) WAS APPROVED BY
THE N.D.C. ON 16TH JANUARY, 1997.
NINTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN (1997-
2002)
 OBJECTIVES:
 I.) PRIORITY TO AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
 II.) ACCELERATING GROWTH RATE OF ECONOMY
 III.) FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL SECURITY FOR ALL
 IV.) CONTAINING GROWTH RATE OF POPULATION
 V.) EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN AND SOCIALLY
DISADVANTAGED GROUPS SUCH AS SC/ST, BACKWARD
CLASSES AND MINORITIES.
 VI.) PROMOTING AND DEVELOPING PARTICIPATORY
INSTITUTIONS LIKE "PANCHAYATI RAJ" INSTITUTIONS, CO-
OPERATIVES AND SELF-HELP GROUPS.
TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (2002-
07)
 ON DECEMBER 21, 2002, THE TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS
APPROVED BY THE NDC. THE PLAN FURTHER DEVELOPED
THE NDC MANDATED OBJECTIVES, OF DOUBLING PER
CAPITA INCOME IN 10 YEARS, AND ACHIEVING A GROWTH
RATE OF 8% OF GDP PER ANNUM. THE PLAN HAD A NUMBER
OF NEW FEATURES, SUCH AS, FOR THE FIRST TIME
 (A) IT RECOGNISED THE RAPID GROWTH OF LABOUR
FORCE OVER THE NEXT DECADE
 (B) ADDRESSED THE ISSUE OF POVERTY AND THE
UNACCEPTABLY LOW LEVELS OF SOCIAL INDICATORS
TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN
(2002-07)
 (C) ADOPTED A "DIFFERENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGY" TO EQUATE NATIONAL TARGETS INTO
BALANCED REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS THERE IS
VAST DIFFERENCE IN THE POTENTIALS AND
CONSTRAINTS OF EACH STATE
 (D) RECOGNISED THAT THE GOVERNANCE IS
PERHAPS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS
FOR ENSURING REALISATION OF THE PLAN
 (E) IDENTIFIED MEASURES TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY,
UNLEASH ENTREPRENEURIAL ENERGY, AND
PROMOTE RAPID AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
 (F) PROPOSED MAJOR REFORMS FOR
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR MAKING 'AGRICULTURE'
THE CORE ELEMENT OF THE PLAN.
TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN
(2002-07)
 SINCE ECONOMIC GROWTH IS NOT THE ONLY
OBJECTIVE, THE PLAN AIMS AT HARNESSING
THE BENEFITS OF GROWTH TO IMPROVE THE
QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE PEOPLE BY SETTING
THE FOLLOWING KEY TARGETS:
 1. ALL CHILDREN TO BE IN SCHOOL BY
2003 AND ALL CHILDREN TO COMPLETE
FIVE YEARS OF SCHOOLING BY 2007
 2. REDUCTION IN POVERTY RATIO
FROM 26% TO 21%
 3. GROWTH IN GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT
TO, AT LEAST, KEEP PACE WITH
ADDITION TO THE LABOUR FORCE
 4. DECADAL POPULATION GROWTH TO
REDUCE FROM 21.3% IN 1991-2001 TO
16.2% BY 2001-11
TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN
(2002-07)
 5. REDUCING GENDER GAPS IN LITERACY AND
WAGE RATES BY 50%
 6. LITERACY RATE TO INCREASE FROM 65% IN
1999-2000 TO 75% IN 2001
 7. INFANT MORTALITY RATE (IMR) TO BE
REDUCED FROM 72 IN 1999-2000, TO 45 IN 2007
 8. .MATERNAL MORTALITY RATE (MMR) TO BE
REDUCED FROM 4 PER 1000 IN 1999-2000 TO 2
PER 1000 IN 2007
 9. PROVIDING PORTABLE DRINKING WATER IN
ALL VILLAGES
 10. CLEANING OF MAJOR POLLUTED RIVER
STRETCHES
 11. INCREASE IN FOREST/TREE COVER FROM
19% IN 1999-2000 TO 25% IN 2007
ELEVENTH PLAN (2007-
2012)
 THE UNITED PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE
GOVERNMENT ISSUED A PAPER IN THE
ELEVENTH PLAN TITLED "TOWARDS FASTER
AND MORE INCLUSIVE GROWTH." ACCORDING
TO THE APPROACH PAPER, THE MONITORABLE
TARGETS OF FIVE-YEAR PLAN ARE:
 1. GDP GROWTH RATE TO BE INCREASED TO
10% BY THE END OF THE PLAN;
 2. FARM SECTOR GROWTH TO BE INCREASED
TO 4%;
 3. CREATION OF SEVEN CRORE JOB
OPPORTUNITIES;
 4. REDUCE EDUCATED UNEMPLOYED YOUTH TO
BELOW 5 PERCENT
ELEVENTH PLAN (2007-
2012)
 5. INFANT MORTALITY RATES TO BE REDUCED
TO 28 PER 1000 BIRTHS;
 6. MATERNAL DEATH RATES TO BE REDUCED
TO 1 PER 1000 BIRTHS;
 7. CLEAN DRINKING WATER TO ALL BY 2009;
 8. IMPROVE SEX RATIO TO 935 BY 2011-12 AND
TO 950 BY 2016-17;
 9. ENSURE ELECTRICITY CONNECTION TO ALL
VILLAGES AND BROADBAND OVER POWER
LINES (BPL) HOUSEHOLDS BY 2009
ELEVENTH PLAN (2007-
2012)
 10. ROADS TO ALL VILLAGES THAT HAVE A
POPULATION OF 1000 AND ABOVE BY 2009;
 11. INCREASE FOREST AND TREE COVER BY 5%;
 12. ACHIEVE THE WORLD HEALTH
ORGANIZATION STANDARD AIR QUALITY IN
MAJOR CITIES BY 2011-12;
 13. TREAT ALL URBAN WASTEWATER BY 2011-12
TO CLEAN RIVER WATERS;
 14. INCREASE ENERGY EFFICIENCY BY 20
PERCENT BY 2016-17
REAL GROWTH IN INDIA – FIRST PLAN TO ELEVENTH PLAN
Plan Period
Real Income
Growth
Sectoral Growth Rate
Plan Actual
Target Growth Agriculture
Industr
y
Services
First Plan 1951-56 2.1 3.5 2.9 5.9 3.7
Second Plan 1956-61 4.5 4.2 3.2 6.4 4.6
Third Plan 1961-66 5.6 2.8 -0.5 6.8 5
Fourth Plan 1969-74 5.7 3.2 2.6 3.7 4
Fifth Plan 1974-79 4.4 4.7 3.4 6.3 5.5
Sixth Plan 1980-85 5.2 5.5 5.5 6.2 5.4
Seventh
Plan
1985-90 5 5.6 3.4 7.5 7.4
Eighth Plan 1992-97 5.6 6.5 3.9 8 7.9
Ninth Plan 1997-02 6.5 5.5 2 4.6 8.1
Tenth Plan 2002-07 7.9 7.7 2.3 9.2 9.3
Eleventh 2007-12 9 7.8$ 4 NA NA
Growth during Five Year Plans
Growth during Five Year Plans
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Five Year Plan
GrowthRate
Target Actual
SECTORAL GROWTH RATE
Sectoral Growth Rate
-5
0
5
10
Five Year Plans
GrowthRate
Agriculture Industry Services
Agriculture 2.9 3.2 -1 2.6 3.4 5.5 3.4 3.9 2 2.3
Industry 5.9 6.4 6.8 3.7 6.3 6.2 7.5 8 4.6 9.2
Services 3.7 4.6 5 4 5.5 5.4 7.4 7.9 8.1 9.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Plan Outlay in Public Sector in India
(1951-1952 to 2008-2009)
Year Plan Outlay
First Plan 1960
Second Plan 4672
Third Plan 8576.5
Fourth Plan 15778.8
Fifth Plan 39426.2
Sixth Plan 110467.3
Seventh Plan 218729.6
Eighth Plan 485457.24
Ninth Plan 813997.9
Tenth Plan 1119552
PLAN OUTLAY
Plan Outlay
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Five Year Plans
Outlay(Rs.
Crore)
Plan Outlay
SECTORAL OUTLAYS DURING THE PLAN
Sectoral Outlays during the Plans (Rs. Crore)
(First Plan to Eleventh Plan)
Agriculture &
Irrigation
Power Industry Transport &
Communi
cations
Social
Services
Total
First
Plan
1951-56 600 (31) 260 (13) 120 (6) 520 (27) 460 (22)
1960
(100)
Second
Plan
1956-61 950 (20) 440 (10) 1080 (24) 1300 (28) 830 (18)
4600
(100)
Third
Plan
1961-66 1750 (21)
1250
(14)
1970 (23) 2120 (25) 1490 (17)
8580
(100)
Fourth
Plan
1969-74 3810 (24)
2450
(15)
3630 (23) 3240 (20) 2770 (18)
15900
(100)
Fifth
Plan
1974-79 8740 (22)
7400
(19)
9580 (26) 6870 (18) 6840 (17)
39430
(100)
Sixth
Plan
1980-85 26130 (24)
30750
(28)
16950 (16) 17680 (16) 17780 (16)
109290
(100)
Seventh
Plan
1985-90 48100 (22)
61690
(28)
29220 (13) 41000 (19) 38720 (18)
218730
(100)
Eighth
Plan
1992-97 101150 (21)
128900
(27)
47890 (10) 101550 (21) 105570 (22)
485460
(100)
Plan-wise Financial Expenditure on Irrigation in India
(At Constant Prices 1980-81=100) (First Plan to 1999-2000)
(Rs. in Crore)
Period
Major &
Mediu
m
Minor
Command Area
Deve- Major & Medium, Minor and CAD Total Plan Expen- Perce
State
Institu-
Total
lopment
Total
Cumu-
Average Per
Year
diture in All Sectors
-ntage of
Expe
nd.
On
Irrig
atio
n to
Total
tional lative
First Plan (1951-56) 2154.6 375.7 0.0 375.7 0.0 2530.4 2530.7 506.1 11225.7 23
Second Plan (1956-61) 1950.7 730.0 99.6 829.4 0.0 2780.1 5310.8 556.0 23983.6 12
Third Plan (1961-66) 2366.5
1339.
8 474.1 1813.9 0.0 4181.3 9491.1 836.1 35238.3 12
Annual Plans (1966-69) 1246.9 932.1 680.9 1613.0 0.0 2859.9 12351.0 953.3 19219.6 15
Fourth Plan (1969-74) 2875.7
1171.
8 1530.3 2702.1 0.0 5577.8 17928.8 1115.6 36525.5 15
Fifth Plan (1974-78) 3647.7 909.7 1158.0 2067.7 214.0 5929.4 23858.2 1482.4 41538.1 14
Annual Plans (1978-80) 2653.0 633.3 613.1 1246.4 274.8 4174.1 28032.3 2087.0 29291.6 14
Sixth Plan (1980-85) 6401.0
1719.
3 1248.8 2968.0 645.5 10014.5 38046.8 2002.9 94937.5 11
Seventh Plan (1985-90) 7003.3
1974.
7 1930.0 3904.7 912.7 11820.7 49867.5 2364.1 137913.0 9
Annual Plan (1990-91) 1319.4 406.7 338.3 745.0 143.0 2207.4 52074.9 2207.4 29228.3 8
Annual Plan (1991-92) 1243.5 371.7 296.8 668.5 147.0 2059.0 54133.9 2059.0 28512.1 7
Eighth Plan (1992-97)
(Anticipated) 7330.8
2107.
8 1435.0 3542.8 655.6 11529.2 65663.1 2305.8 164231.6 7
Ninth Plan (1997-02)
Outlay 11944.8
2605.
3 739.3 3344.6 804.1 16093.6 81756.7 3218.7 238900.6 7
Annual Plan (1997-98)
Actual 2102.0 416.9 125.6 542.5 120.3 2764.8 68427.9 2764.8 36078.9 8
Annual Plan (1998-99)
(Anticipated) 2446.5 471.1 157.1 628.3 125.6 3200.3 71628.3 3200.3 @21972.8 15
Annual Plan (1999-
2000) 3121.9 553.1 181.8 734.9 125.1 3982 75610.2 3982 43419.9 9
Plan-wise Investment on Water Supply and Sanitation Sector in India
(1951-1956 to 2002-2007)
(Rs. in Crore)
Plan Period
% of
Public
Sector
Outlay
% of Public
Sector
Outlay
% of Public
Sector Outlay
I Plan (1951-56) 1.48 1.28 0.18
II Plan (1956-61) 1.07 0.65 0.41
III Plan (1961-66) 1.23 1.04 0.19
3 Annual Plans (1966-69) 1.6 N.A N.A
IV Plan (1969-74) 2.75 1.77 0.97
V Plan (1974-79) 2.62 1.4 1.22
Annual Plan (1979-80) 3.43 1.58 1.85
VI Plan (1980-85) 4.15 1.81 2.34
VII Plan (1985-90) 3.62 1.65 1.98
2 Annual Plans (1990-92) 3.23 1.26 1.97
VIII Plan (1992-97) 3.85 1.38 2.47
IX Plan (1997-02) 4.46 2.16 2.43
X Plan (2002-07) 2.89 1.3 1.8
Budgetary Allocations for Education by Centre/States and its Percentage of GDP in I
Budgetary Allocations for Education by Centre/States and its Percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in India
(1991-1992 to 2005-2006)
Year
Budgetary Allocation on Education by
Education and Other Deptt.
(Centre + States/Uts)
Allocation for Education as
Percentage of GDP(Rs. in Crore)
1991-1992 22393.69 3.8
1992-1993 25030.3 3.72
1993-1994 28279.69 3.62
1994-1995 32606.22 3.56
1995-1996 38178.09 3.56
1996-1997 43896.48 3.53
1997-1998 48552.14 3.49
1998-1999 61578.91 3.85
1999-2000 74816.09 4.17
2000-2001 82486.48 4.27
2001-2002 79865.7 3.81
2002-2003 85507.34 3.79
2003-2004 89079.25 3.5
2004-2005 104566.00 (RE) 3.68
2005-2006 119029.88 (BE) 3.72
Planwise Share of Public and Private Sectors in
Gross Domestic Capital Formation in India
(First Plan to Eighth Plan)
Average for Plan
Period
(Plan Period Averages at current prices)
Public
Sector
(Rs.
million)
Private
Sector
(Rs.
million)
Total
(Rs.
million)
Percentage
Share in Total
Saving
As % of GDP
Tota
l
at Market
Prices
Public
Sector
Private
Sector
Publ
ic
Sect
or
Privat
e
Sector
First Plan (1951-56) 3587 7229 10816 33.2 66.8 3.5 7.1 10.7
Second Plan (1956-61) 8587 11667 20254 42.4 57.6 6.1 8.4 14.5
Third Plan (1961-66) 15932 17558 33490 47.6 52.4 7.4 8.1 15.5
Annual Plans (1966-69) 21207 31739 52947 40.1 59.9 6.3 9.4 15.7
Fourth Plan (1969-74) 32885 49919 82804 39.7 60.3 6.8 10.3 17.1
Fifth Plan (1974-78#) 69496 89694 159190 43.7 56.3 8.3 10.8 19.1
Annual Plans (1978-80) 108776 138944 247720 43.9 56.1 10 12.7 22.7
Sixth Plan (1980-85) 177414 200004 377418 47 53 9.7 11 20.7
Seventh Plan (1985-90) 356950 458250 815200 43.8 56.2 10.3 13.2 23.4
Annual Plan (1990-92) 577799 886316 1464115 39.5 60.5 10 15.4 25.4
Eighth Plan (1992-97*) 843419 1694157 2537576 33.2 66.8 8.6 17.4 26
ACHIEVEMENTS OF
PLANNING IN INDIA
 INCREASE IN NATIONAL AND PER
CAPITA INCOME
 PROGRESS IN AGRICULTURE
Progress in the use of agricultural
inputs
Increased Agricultural Production
PROGRESS IN INDUSTRY
ACHIEVEMENTS OF
PLANNING IN INDIA (Contd.)
 DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC
INFRASTRUCTURE
 DIVERSIFICATION OF EXPORTS
AND IMPORT SUBSTITUTION
 DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
 DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL
SYSTEM
FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES
OF PLANNING
 FAILURE TO ELIMINATE POVERTY
 FAILURE TO PROVIDE
EMPLOYMENT
 FAILURE TO REDUCE
INEQUALITIES OF INCOME AND
WEALTH
 FAILURE TO CHECK THE GROWTH
OF BLACK MONEY
FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES
OF PLANNING (Contd.)
 FAILURE TO REDUCE
CONCENTRATION OF ECONOMIC
POWER
 FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT LAND
REFORMS

Development planning & five year plans

  • 1.
  • 3.
    INDIAN ECONOMY  WHATGOODS AND SERVICES SHOULD BE PRODUCED IN THE COUNTRY?  HOW SHOULD THE GOODS AND SERVICES BE PRODUCED? SHOULD PRODUCERS USE MORE HUMAN LABOUR OR MORE CAPITAL (MACHINES) FOR PRODUCING THINGS?  HOW SHOULD THE GOODS AND SERVICES BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG PEOPLE?  A POLICY OF MIXED ECONOMY IS FOLLOWED IN THE COUNTRY.  IN A MIXED ECONOMY, THE PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES (GOVERNMENT-OWNED) EXIST ALONGSIDE THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO ACHIEVE A SOCIALIST PATTERN OF SOCIETY IN A WELFARE STATE.
  • 4.
    WHAT IS APLAN ?  A PLAN SPELLS OUT HOW THE RESOURCES OF A NATION SHOULD BE PUT TO USE.  SOME GENERAL GOALS AS WELL AS SOME SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES  TO BE ACHIEVED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME  IN INDIA PLANS ARE OF FIVE YEARS DURATION  OUR PLAN DOCUMENTS SPECIFY THE OBJECTIVES TO BE ATTAINED IN THE FIVE YEARS OF A PLAN  PLAN DOCUMENTS ALSO SPECIFY WHAT IS TO BE ACHIEVED OVER A PERIOD OF TWENTY YEARS. THIS LONG-TERM PLAN IS CALLED ‘PERSPECTIVE PLAN’.  THE FIVE YEAR PLANS ARE SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR THE PERSPECTIVE PLAN.
  • 6.
    PLANNING IN INDIA PLANNING COMMISSION  ESTABLISHED IN MARCH 1950  A STATUTORY BODY WITH THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA AS ITS CHAIRMAN  SET UP TO FORMULATE BASIC ECONOMIC POLICIES, DRAFT PLANS AND WATCH ITS PROGRESS AND IMPLEMENTATION.  PT. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU WAS THE FIRST CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
  • 7.
    India's first PrimeMinister, Jawaharlal Nehru, establishes a five-year plan for agricultural reform, committing India to a socialist path to development.
  • 8.
    PLANNING IN INDIA NATIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL  AN ADVISORY BODY ATTACHED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION  ESTABLISHED IN 1965.  IT INCLUDES EXPERTS REPRESENTING A CROSS-SECTION OF THE INDIAN ECONOMY.  NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL  ESTABLISHED IN 1951  CMs OF THE STATES, TOGETHER WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CONSTITUTE THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL.  THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA PRESIDES OVER THE COUNCIL.
  • 9.
    FIVE YEAR PLANS THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE DRAWN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH INDIA'S ECONOMY ON A SOCIALISTIC PATTERN IN SUCCESSIVE PHASES OF FIVE YEAR PERIODS-CALLED THE FIVE YEAR PLANS. IT CONSISTS OF:  (I) PLANNING COMMISSION OF INDIA  (II) NATIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL  (III) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND STATE PLANNING COMMISSIONS
  • 10.
    FIVE YEAR PLANS THE GOALS OF THE FIVE YEAR PLANS ARE: GROWTH MODERNISATION SELF-RELIANCE AND EQUITY.
  • 11.
    PRASANTA CHANDRA MAHALANOBIS: THE ARCHITECT OF INDIAN PLANNING
  • 12.
    FIRST FIVE YEARPLAN (1951-56)  IN JULY 1951, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ISSUED THE DRAFT OUTLINE OF THE FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1951 TO MARCH 1956. IT WAS PRESENTED TO THE PARLIAMENT IN DECEMBER 1952.  IN THE FIRST PLAN, AGRICULTURE RECEIVED THE MAIN THRUST, FOR SUSTAINING OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIES WHICH WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE WITHOUT A SIGNIFICANT RISE IN THE YIELD OF RAW MATERIALS AND FOOD.
  • 13.
    FIRST FIVE YEARPLAN (1951-56)  OBJECTIVES:  I) TO INCREASE FOOD PRODUCTION.  II) TO FULLY UTILISE AVAILABLE RAW MATERIALS.  III) TO CHECK INFLATIONARY PRESSURE.  OUTLAY: THE TOTAL PROPOSED OUTLAY WAS RS. 3,870 CRORE.  IT WAS MORE THAN A SUCCESS, BECAUSE OF GOOD HARVESTS IN THE LAST TWO YEARS.
  • 14.
    SECOND FIVE YEARPLAN (1956-61)  ALSO CALLED MAHALANOBIS PLAN AFTER ITS CHIEF-ARCHITECT.  THE MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO LAUNCH INDUSTRIALISATION AND STRENGTHEN THE INDUSTRIAL BASE OF THE ECONOMY.  IT WAS IN THIS LIGHT THAT THE 1948 INDUSTRIAL POLICY RESOLUTION WAS REVISED AND A NEW RESOLUTION OF 1956 WAS ADOPTED.  THE SECOND PLAN STARTED WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE EXPANSION OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND AIMED AT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SOCIALISTIC PATTERN OF SOCIETY.
  • 15.
    SECOND FIVE YEARPLAN (1956-61)  OBJECTIVES:  I) A SIZEABLE INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME SO AS TO RAISE THE LEVEL OF LIVING.  II) RAPID INDUSTRIALISATION OF THE COUNTRY WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF BASIC AND KEY INDUSTRIES.  OUTLAY: THE SECOND PLAN PROPOSED A TOTAL PUBLIC SECTOR OUTLAY OF RS. 4,800 CRORES THOUGH ACTUAL OUTLAY WAS ONLY RS. 4,672 CRORE.  ADVOCATED HUGE IMPORTS WHICH LED TO EMPTYING OF FUNDS LEADING TO FOREIGN LOANS. IT SHIFTED BASIC EMPHASIS FROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRY FAR TOO SOON. DURING THIS PLAN, PRICE LEVEL INCREASED BY 30%, AGAINST A DECLINE OF 13% DURING THE FIRST PLAN.
  • 16.
    THIRD FIVE YEARPLAN (1961-66)  IN THE THIRD PLAN, THE EMPHASIS WAS ON LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT.  THE THIRD PLAN REPORT STATED THAT DURING THE FIVE-YEAR PERIOD CONCERNED, THE INDIAN ECONOMY "MUST NOT ONLY EXPAND RAPIDLY BUT, AT THE SAME TIME, BECOME SELF-RELIANT AND SELF- GENERATING."
  • 17.
    THIRD FIVE YEARPLAN (1961-66)  OBJECTIVES:  I) AN INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME OF MORE THAN 5 PER CENT ANNUALLY. THE INVESTMENT PATTERN LAID DOWN MUST BE CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING THIS GROWTH RATE IN THE SUBSEQUENT YEARS.  II) AN INCREASE IN THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE AND TO ACHIEVE SELF SUFFICIENCY BY INCREASING FOOD GRAIN PRODUCTION.  III) GREATER EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITIES, MORE EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF ECONOMIC POWER AND REDUCING WEALTH AND INCOME DISPARITIES.  ALSO, IT WAS REALIZED FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF FIRST TWO PLANS THAT AGRICULTURE SHOULD BE GIVEN THE TOP PRIORITY TO SUFFICE THE REQUIREMENT OF EXPORT AND INDUSTRY.  COMPLETE FAILURE DUE TO UNFORESEEN MISFORTUNES, VIZ. CHINESE AGGRESSION (1962), INDO-PAK WAR (1965), SEVEREST DROUGHT IN 100 YEARS (1965-66).
  • 18.
    THREE ANNUAL PLANS(1966-69)  PLAN HOLIDAY FOR 3YEARS.  THE PREVAILING CRISIS IN AGRICULTURE AND SERIOUS FOOD SHORTAGE NECESSITATED THE EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS.  DURING THESE PLANS A WHOLE NEW AGRICULTURAL STRATEGY INVOLVING WIDE- SPREAD DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-YIELDING VARIETIES OF SEEDS, THE EXTENSIVE USE OF FERTILIZERS, EXPLOITATION OF IRRIGATION POTENTIAL AND SOIL CONSERVATION WAS PUT INTO ACTION TO TIDE-OVER THE CRISIS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION.  DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS, THE ECONOMY BASICALLY ABSORBED THE SHOCKS GIVEN DURING THE THIRD PLAN, MAKING WAY FOR A PLANNED GROWTH.
  • 19.
    FOURTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1969-74)  AFTER THE ‘PLAN HOLIDAY', THE FOURTH PLAN WAS BEGUN IN 1969.  OBJECTIVES:  I) TO ACHIEVE STABILITY AND PROGRESS TOWARDS SELF-RELIANCE.  II) TO ACHIEVE AN OVERALL RATE OF GROWTH OF 5.7 PER CENT ANNUALLY.  III) TO RAISE EXPORTS AT THE RATE OF 7 PER CENT ANNUALLY.  OUTLAY: THE TOTAL PROPOSED OUTLAY WAS RS. 24,880 CRORE, WHICH INCLUDED RS. 15,900 CRORES AS PUBLIC SECTOR OUTLAY AND RS. 8,980 CRORE AS PRIVATE SECTOR OUTLAY.
  • 20.
    FOURTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1969-74)  MAIN EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE'S GROWTH RATE SO THAT A CHAIN REACTION CAN START.  FARED WELL IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS WITH RECORD PRODUCTION, LAST THREE YEARS FAILURE BECAUSE OF POOR MONSOON.  HAD TO TACKLE THE INFLUX OF BANGLADESHI REFUGEES BEFORE AND AFTER 1971 INDO-PAK WAR.
  • 21.
    FIFTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1974-79)  THE PLAN WAS FORMULATED AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF SEVERE INFLATIONARY PRESSURE.  THE FIFTH PLAN PREPARED AND LAUNCHED BY D.D. DHAR PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE TWO MAIN OBJECTIVES VIZ, 'REMOVAL OF POVERTY' (GARIBI HATAO) AND 'ATTAINMENT OF SELF RELIANCE', THROUGH PROMOTION OF HIGH RATE OF GROWTH, BETTER DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND A VERY SIGNIFICANT GROWTH IN THE DOMESTIC RATE OF SAVINGS.  OBJECTIVES: IN ADDITION TO REMOVAL OF POVERTY AND ATTAINMENT OF SELF-RELIANCE, THE FIFTH PLAN HAD THE FOLLOWING MAJOR OBJECTIVES.  I) 5.5 PER CENT OVERALL RATE OF GROWTH IN GROSS DOMESTIC OBJECTIVES.
  • 22.
    FIFTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1974-79)  II) EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT AND FULLER UTILISATION OF EXISTING SKILLS AND EQUIPMENT.  III) A NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR MINIMUM NEEDS AND EXTENDED PROGRAMMES OF SOCIAL WELFARE.  OUTLAY: A TOTAL OUTLAY OF RS. 53,410 CRORE WAS PROPOSED FOR THE FIFTH PLAN.  THE PLAN WAS TERMINATED IN 1978 (INSTEAD OF 1979) WHEN JANTA GOVT.CAME TO POWER.
  • 23.
    SIXTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1980-85)  THE DRAFT OF THE SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1978- 1983) WAS PRESENTED IN 1978. HOWEVER, THE PLAN WAS TERMINATED WITH THE CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT IN JANUARY 1980. THE NEW SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS IMPLEMENTED IN APRIL 1980.  OBJECTIVES:  I) TO ELIMINATE UNEMPLOYMENT AND UNDEREMPLOYMENT.  II) TO RAISE THE STANDARD OF LIVING OF THE POOREST OF MASSES.  III) TO REDUCE DISPARITIES IN INCOME AND WEALTH.  OUTLAY: THE PROPOSED OUTLAY FOR THE SIXTH PLAN TOTALLED RS. 1,58,710 CRORE.
  • 24.
    SEVENTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1985-90)  THE DRAFT OF THE SEVENTH PLAN WAS APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 9, 1985 BY THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL. THE PLAN WAS PART OF THE LONG-TERM PLAN FOR THE PERIOD OF 15 YEARS.  OBJECTIVES:  I) DECENTRALISATION OF PLANNING AND FULL PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT.  II) THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE GENERATION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT.  III) REMOVAL OF POVERTY AND REDUCTION IN INCOME DISPARITIES. IT WAS A GREAT SUCCESS, THE ECONOMY RECORDED 6% GROWTH RATE AGAINST THE TARGETED 5%.
  • 25.
    EIGHTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1992-97)  THE EIGHTH PLAN WAS POSTPONED BY TWO YEARS BECAUSE OF POLITICAL UPHEAVALS AT THE CENTRE AND IT WAS LAUNCHED AFTER A WORSENING BALANCE OF PAYMENT POSITION AND INFLATION DURING 1990-91.  THE EIGHTH PLAN PROPOSED A GROWTH RATE OF 5.6 PER CENT PER ANNUM ON AN AVERAGE DURING THE PLAN PERIOD.  THE EIGHTH PLAN FOCUSED ON CLEAR PRIORITISATION OF SECTORS/PROJECTS FOR INVESTMENT IN ORDER TO FACILITATE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE POLICY INITIATIVES TAKEN IN THE AREAS OF FISCAL, TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL SECTORS AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT.
  • 26.
    EIGHTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1992-97)  OBJECTIVES:  I) GENERATION OF ADEQUATE EMPLOYMENT TO ACHIEVE NEAR FULL EMPLOYMENT LEVEL BY THE TURN OF THE CENTURY.  II) CONTAINMENT OF POPULATION GROWTH THROUGH PEOPLE'S ACTIVE CO-OPERATION AND AN EFFECTIVE SCHEME OF INCENTIVES AND DISINCENTIVES.  III) UNIVERSALISATION OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION AND COMPLETE ERADICATION OF ILLITERACY AMONG THE PEOPLE IN THE AGE GROUP OF 15 TO 35 YEARS.
  • 27.
    EIGHTH FIVE YEARPLAN (1992-97)  SOME OF THE MAIN ECONOMIC PERFORMANCES DURING EIGHTH PLAN PERIOD WERE RAPID ECONOMIC GROWTH, HIGH GROWTH OF AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SECTOR, AND MANUFACTURING SECTOR, GROWTH IN EXPORTS AND IMPORTS, IMPROVEMENT IN TRADE AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT.
  • 28.
    NINTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN(1997-2002)  IT BEGAN ON APRIL 1, 1997. THE NINTH PLAN WAS THE FIRST CONCRETE ATTEMPT TO TRANSLATE THE PROGRAMME OF ECONOMIC REFORMS AND THE NEW ECONOMIC POLICY WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF AN INDICATIVE PLAN.  THE APPROACH PAPER TO THE NINTH PLAN (1997-2002) WAS APPROVED BY THE N.D.C. ON 16TH JANUARY, 1997.
  • 29.
    NINTH FIVE-YEAR PLAN(1997- 2002)  OBJECTIVES:  I.) PRIORITY TO AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT  II.) ACCELERATING GROWTH RATE OF ECONOMY  III.) FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL SECURITY FOR ALL  IV.) CONTAINING GROWTH RATE OF POPULATION  V.) EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN AND SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED GROUPS SUCH AS SC/ST, BACKWARD CLASSES AND MINORITIES.  VI.) PROMOTING AND DEVELOPING PARTICIPATORY INSTITUTIONS LIKE "PANCHAYATI RAJ" INSTITUTIONS, CO- OPERATIVES AND SELF-HELP GROUPS.
  • 30.
    TENTH FIVE YEARPLAN (2002- 07)  ON DECEMBER 21, 2002, THE TENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN WAS APPROVED BY THE NDC. THE PLAN FURTHER DEVELOPED THE NDC MANDATED OBJECTIVES, OF DOUBLING PER CAPITA INCOME IN 10 YEARS, AND ACHIEVING A GROWTH RATE OF 8% OF GDP PER ANNUM. THE PLAN HAD A NUMBER OF NEW FEATURES, SUCH AS, FOR THE FIRST TIME  (A) IT RECOGNISED THE RAPID GROWTH OF LABOUR FORCE OVER THE NEXT DECADE  (B) ADDRESSED THE ISSUE OF POVERTY AND THE UNACCEPTABLY LOW LEVELS OF SOCIAL INDICATORS
  • 31.
    TENTH FIVE YEARPLAN (2002-07)  (C) ADOPTED A "DIFFERENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY" TO EQUATE NATIONAL TARGETS INTO BALANCED REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AS THERE IS VAST DIFFERENCE IN THE POTENTIALS AND CONSTRAINTS OF EACH STATE  (D) RECOGNISED THAT THE GOVERNANCE IS PERHAPS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS FOR ENSURING REALISATION OF THE PLAN  (E) IDENTIFIED MEASURES TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY, UNLEASH ENTREPRENEURIAL ENERGY, AND PROMOTE RAPID AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH  (F) PROPOSED MAJOR REFORMS FOR AGRICULTURAL SECTOR MAKING 'AGRICULTURE' THE CORE ELEMENT OF THE PLAN.
  • 32.
    TENTH FIVE YEARPLAN (2002-07)  SINCE ECONOMIC GROWTH IS NOT THE ONLY OBJECTIVE, THE PLAN AIMS AT HARNESSING THE BENEFITS OF GROWTH TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE PEOPLE BY SETTING THE FOLLOWING KEY TARGETS:  1. ALL CHILDREN TO BE IN SCHOOL BY 2003 AND ALL CHILDREN TO COMPLETE FIVE YEARS OF SCHOOLING BY 2007  2. REDUCTION IN POVERTY RATIO FROM 26% TO 21%  3. GROWTH IN GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT TO, AT LEAST, KEEP PACE WITH ADDITION TO THE LABOUR FORCE  4. DECADAL POPULATION GROWTH TO REDUCE FROM 21.3% IN 1991-2001 TO 16.2% BY 2001-11
  • 33.
    TENTH FIVE YEARPLAN (2002-07)  5. REDUCING GENDER GAPS IN LITERACY AND WAGE RATES BY 50%  6. LITERACY RATE TO INCREASE FROM 65% IN 1999-2000 TO 75% IN 2001  7. INFANT MORTALITY RATE (IMR) TO BE REDUCED FROM 72 IN 1999-2000, TO 45 IN 2007  8. .MATERNAL MORTALITY RATE (MMR) TO BE REDUCED FROM 4 PER 1000 IN 1999-2000 TO 2 PER 1000 IN 2007  9. PROVIDING PORTABLE DRINKING WATER IN ALL VILLAGES  10. CLEANING OF MAJOR POLLUTED RIVER STRETCHES  11. INCREASE IN FOREST/TREE COVER FROM 19% IN 1999-2000 TO 25% IN 2007
  • 34.
    ELEVENTH PLAN (2007- 2012) THE UNITED PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE GOVERNMENT ISSUED A PAPER IN THE ELEVENTH PLAN TITLED "TOWARDS FASTER AND MORE INCLUSIVE GROWTH." ACCORDING TO THE APPROACH PAPER, THE MONITORABLE TARGETS OF FIVE-YEAR PLAN ARE:  1. GDP GROWTH RATE TO BE INCREASED TO 10% BY THE END OF THE PLAN;  2. FARM SECTOR GROWTH TO BE INCREASED TO 4%;  3. CREATION OF SEVEN CRORE JOB OPPORTUNITIES;  4. REDUCE EDUCATED UNEMPLOYED YOUTH TO BELOW 5 PERCENT
  • 35.
    ELEVENTH PLAN (2007- 2012) 5. INFANT MORTALITY RATES TO BE REDUCED TO 28 PER 1000 BIRTHS;  6. MATERNAL DEATH RATES TO BE REDUCED TO 1 PER 1000 BIRTHS;  7. CLEAN DRINKING WATER TO ALL BY 2009;  8. IMPROVE SEX RATIO TO 935 BY 2011-12 AND TO 950 BY 2016-17;  9. ENSURE ELECTRICITY CONNECTION TO ALL VILLAGES AND BROADBAND OVER POWER LINES (BPL) HOUSEHOLDS BY 2009
  • 36.
    ELEVENTH PLAN (2007- 2012) 10. ROADS TO ALL VILLAGES THAT HAVE A POPULATION OF 1000 AND ABOVE BY 2009;  11. INCREASE FOREST AND TREE COVER BY 5%;  12. ACHIEVE THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION STANDARD AIR QUALITY IN MAJOR CITIES BY 2011-12;  13. TREAT ALL URBAN WASTEWATER BY 2011-12 TO CLEAN RIVER WATERS;  14. INCREASE ENERGY EFFICIENCY BY 20 PERCENT BY 2016-17
  • 37.
    REAL GROWTH ININDIA – FIRST PLAN TO ELEVENTH PLAN Plan Period Real Income Growth Sectoral Growth Rate Plan Actual Target Growth Agriculture Industr y Services First Plan 1951-56 2.1 3.5 2.9 5.9 3.7 Second Plan 1956-61 4.5 4.2 3.2 6.4 4.6 Third Plan 1961-66 5.6 2.8 -0.5 6.8 5 Fourth Plan 1969-74 5.7 3.2 2.6 3.7 4 Fifth Plan 1974-79 4.4 4.7 3.4 6.3 5.5 Sixth Plan 1980-85 5.2 5.5 5.5 6.2 5.4 Seventh Plan 1985-90 5 5.6 3.4 7.5 7.4 Eighth Plan 1992-97 5.6 6.5 3.9 8 7.9 Ninth Plan 1997-02 6.5 5.5 2 4.6 8.1 Tenth Plan 2002-07 7.9 7.7 2.3 9.2 9.3 Eleventh 2007-12 9 7.8$ 4 NA NA
  • 38.
    Growth during FiveYear Plans Growth during Five Year Plans 0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Five Year Plan GrowthRate Target Actual
  • 39.
    SECTORAL GROWTH RATE SectoralGrowth Rate -5 0 5 10 Five Year Plans GrowthRate Agriculture Industry Services Agriculture 2.9 3.2 -1 2.6 3.4 5.5 3.4 3.9 2 2.3 Industry 5.9 6.4 6.8 3.7 6.3 6.2 7.5 8 4.6 9.2 Services 3.7 4.6 5 4 5.5 5.4 7.4 7.9 8.1 9.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
  • 40.
    Plan Outlay inPublic Sector in India (1951-1952 to 2008-2009) Year Plan Outlay First Plan 1960 Second Plan 4672 Third Plan 8576.5 Fourth Plan 15778.8 Fifth Plan 39426.2 Sixth Plan 110467.3 Seventh Plan 218729.6 Eighth Plan 485457.24 Ninth Plan 813997.9 Tenth Plan 1119552
  • 41.
    PLAN OUTLAY Plan Outlay 0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Five Year Plans Outlay(Rs. Crore) Plan Outlay
  • 42.
    SECTORAL OUTLAYS DURINGTHE PLAN Sectoral Outlays during the Plans (Rs. Crore) (First Plan to Eleventh Plan) Agriculture & Irrigation Power Industry Transport & Communi cations Social Services Total First Plan 1951-56 600 (31) 260 (13) 120 (6) 520 (27) 460 (22) 1960 (100) Second Plan 1956-61 950 (20) 440 (10) 1080 (24) 1300 (28) 830 (18) 4600 (100) Third Plan 1961-66 1750 (21) 1250 (14) 1970 (23) 2120 (25) 1490 (17) 8580 (100) Fourth Plan 1969-74 3810 (24) 2450 (15) 3630 (23) 3240 (20) 2770 (18) 15900 (100) Fifth Plan 1974-79 8740 (22) 7400 (19) 9580 (26) 6870 (18) 6840 (17) 39430 (100) Sixth Plan 1980-85 26130 (24) 30750 (28) 16950 (16) 17680 (16) 17780 (16) 109290 (100) Seventh Plan 1985-90 48100 (22) 61690 (28) 29220 (13) 41000 (19) 38720 (18) 218730 (100) Eighth Plan 1992-97 101150 (21) 128900 (27) 47890 (10) 101550 (21) 105570 (22) 485460 (100)
  • 43.
    Plan-wise Financial Expenditureon Irrigation in India (At Constant Prices 1980-81=100) (First Plan to 1999-2000) (Rs. in Crore) Period Major & Mediu m Minor Command Area Deve- Major & Medium, Minor and CAD Total Plan Expen- Perce State Institu- Total lopment Total Cumu- Average Per Year diture in All Sectors -ntage of Expe nd. On Irrig atio n to Total tional lative First Plan (1951-56) 2154.6 375.7 0.0 375.7 0.0 2530.4 2530.7 506.1 11225.7 23 Second Plan (1956-61) 1950.7 730.0 99.6 829.4 0.0 2780.1 5310.8 556.0 23983.6 12 Third Plan (1961-66) 2366.5 1339. 8 474.1 1813.9 0.0 4181.3 9491.1 836.1 35238.3 12 Annual Plans (1966-69) 1246.9 932.1 680.9 1613.0 0.0 2859.9 12351.0 953.3 19219.6 15 Fourth Plan (1969-74) 2875.7 1171. 8 1530.3 2702.1 0.0 5577.8 17928.8 1115.6 36525.5 15 Fifth Plan (1974-78) 3647.7 909.7 1158.0 2067.7 214.0 5929.4 23858.2 1482.4 41538.1 14 Annual Plans (1978-80) 2653.0 633.3 613.1 1246.4 274.8 4174.1 28032.3 2087.0 29291.6 14 Sixth Plan (1980-85) 6401.0 1719. 3 1248.8 2968.0 645.5 10014.5 38046.8 2002.9 94937.5 11 Seventh Plan (1985-90) 7003.3 1974. 7 1930.0 3904.7 912.7 11820.7 49867.5 2364.1 137913.0 9 Annual Plan (1990-91) 1319.4 406.7 338.3 745.0 143.0 2207.4 52074.9 2207.4 29228.3 8 Annual Plan (1991-92) 1243.5 371.7 296.8 668.5 147.0 2059.0 54133.9 2059.0 28512.1 7 Eighth Plan (1992-97) (Anticipated) 7330.8 2107. 8 1435.0 3542.8 655.6 11529.2 65663.1 2305.8 164231.6 7 Ninth Plan (1997-02) Outlay 11944.8 2605. 3 739.3 3344.6 804.1 16093.6 81756.7 3218.7 238900.6 7 Annual Plan (1997-98) Actual 2102.0 416.9 125.6 542.5 120.3 2764.8 68427.9 2764.8 36078.9 8 Annual Plan (1998-99) (Anticipated) 2446.5 471.1 157.1 628.3 125.6 3200.3 71628.3 3200.3 @21972.8 15 Annual Plan (1999- 2000) 3121.9 553.1 181.8 734.9 125.1 3982 75610.2 3982 43419.9 9
  • 44.
    Plan-wise Investment onWater Supply and Sanitation Sector in India (1951-1956 to 2002-2007) (Rs. in Crore) Plan Period % of Public Sector Outlay % of Public Sector Outlay % of Public Sector Outlay I Plan (1951-56) 1.48 1.28 0.18 II Plan (1956-61) 1.07 0.65 0.41 III Plan (1961-66) 1.23 1.04 0.19 3 Annual Plans (1966-69) 1.6 N.A N.A IV Plan (1969-74) 2.75 1.77 0.97 V Plan (1974-79) 2.62 1.4 1.22 Annual Plan (1979-80) 3.43 1.58 1.85 VI Plan (1980-85) 4.15 1.81 2.34 VII Plan (1985-90) 3.62 1.65 1.98 2 Annual Plans (1990-92) 3.23 1.26 1.97 VIII Plan (1992-97) 3.85 1.38 2.47 IX Plan (1997-02) 4.46 2.16 2.43 X Plan (2002-07) 2.89 1.3 1.8
  • 45.
    Budgetary Allocations forEducation by Centre/States and its Percentage of GDP in I Budgetary Allocations for Education by Centre/States and its Percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in India (1991-1992 to 2005-2006) Year Budgetary Allocation on Education by Education and Other Deptt. (Centre + States/Uts) Allocation for Education as Percentage of GDP(Rs. in Crore) 1991-1992 22393.69 3.8 1992-1993 25030.3 3.72 1993-1994 28279.69 3.62 1994-1995 32606.22 3.56 1995-1996 38178.09 3.56 1996-1997 43896.48 3.53 1997-1998 48552.14 3.49 1998-1999 61578.91 3.85 1999-2000 74816.09 4.17 2000-2001 82486.48 4.27 2001-2002 79865.7 3.81 2002-2003 85507.34 3.79 2003-2004 89079.25 3.5 2004-2005 104566.00 (RE) 3.68 2005-2006 119029.88 (BE) 3.72
  • 46.
    Planwise Share ofPublic and Private Sectors in Gross Domestic Capital Formation in India (First Plan to Eighth Plan) Average for Plan Period (Plan Period Averages at current prices) Public Sector (Rs. million) Private Sector (Rs. million) Total (Rs. million) Percentage Share in Total Saving As % of GDP Tota l at Market Prices Public Sector Private Sector Publ ic Sect or Privat e Sector First Plan (1951-56) 3587 7229 10816 33.2 66.8 3.5 7.1 10.7 Second Plan (1956-61) 8587 11667 20254 42.4 57.6 6.1 8.4 14.5 Third Plan (1961-66) 15932 17558 33490 47.6 52.4 7.4 8.1 15.5 Annual Plans (1966-69) 21207 31739 52947 40.1 59.9 6.3 9.4 15.7 Fourth Plan (1969-74) 32885 49919 82804 39.7 60.3 6.8 10.3 17.1 Fifth Plan (1974-78#) 69496 89694 159190 43.7 56.3 8.3 10.8 19.1 Annual Plans (1978-80) 108776 138944 247720 43.9 56.1 10 12.7 22.7 Sixth Plan (1980-85) 177414 200004 377418 47 53 9.7 11 20.7 Seventh Plan (1985-90) 356950 458250 815200 43.8 56.2 10.3 13.2 23.4 Annual Plan (1990-92) 577799 886316 1464115 39.5 60.5 10 15.4 25.4 Eighth Plan (1992-97*) 843419 1694157 2537576 33.2 66.8 8.6 17.4 26
  • 47.
    ACHIEVEMENTS OF PLANNING ININDIA  INCREASE IN NATIONAL AND PER CAPITA INCOME  PROGRESS IN AGRICULTURE Progress in the use of agricultural inputs Increased Agricultural Production PROGRESS IN INDUSTRY
  • 48.
    ACHIEVEMENTS OF PLANNING ININDIA (Contd.)  DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE  DIVERSIFICATION OF EXPORTS AND IMPORT SUBSTITUTION  DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY  DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM
  • 49.
    FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES OF PLANNING FAILURE TO ELIMINATE POVERTY  FAILURE TO PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT  FAILURE TO REDUCE INEQUALITIES OF INCOME AND WEALTH  FAILURE TO CHECK THE GROWTH OF BLACK MONEY
  • 50.
    FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES OF PLANNING(Contd.)  FAILURE TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION OF ECONOMIC POWER  FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT LAND REFORMS