2. A type of descriptive research;
Widely used in Social Sciences;
Focus: to study the existing relationships between two or more
variables,
To discover what is presently unknown but also to predict the
future relationships between various variables.
Relationship means that an individuals status on one variable
tends to reflect his or her status on the other.
Helps us understand related events, conditions, and
behaviors.
Is there a relationship between educational levels of farmers
and crop yields?
To make predictions of how one variable might predict
another
Can high school grades be used to predict college grades?
3. Correlational Research
To examine the possible existence of
causation
Does physical exercise cause people to lose
weight?
CAUTION: In correlational research you CAN NOT absolutely say once
variable causes something to happen.This can only be done through
experimental research.You can say one variable might cause something else
to happen.
4. X (f) Y i.e. X is the function (f) of Y, and this is
possible only because both are correlated.
X refers to the behaviour of the pigeon;
Y refers to the reinforcement given to the pigeon
after it performs some particular behavior (e.g.,
pecking at a tray).
The pigeon learns to peck at the tray because it
leads to some reward (food).
One thing caused another: the proper
administration of reinforcement led or caused the
bird to behave in a certain manner.
8. Terminology
Is level of education (predictor variable)
related to family income (criterion variable)?
Do people who eat more eggs (predictor
variable) have higher cholesterol levels
(criterion variable)?
9. Where does the data come
from for correlational
research?
Surveys
Scores on various tests or rating scales
Demographic information
10. Correlational Research
Process
Variables to be study are identified
Questions and/or hypotheses are stated
A sample is selected (a minimum of 30 is needed)
Data are collected
Correlations are calculated
Results are reported
11. Which correlation to use?
Pearson
Product
Moment
Kendall tau
Biserial
Correlation
Spearman
rho
Phi correlation
12. Pearson r : It is the most commonly used
correlational procedure.
Used when both the criterion and predictor
variable contain continuous interval data such as
test scores, years of experience, money, etc.
We need pairs of raw scores on two tests, one
pair for each subject of the sample.
Test of science Test of math
13. Spearman r :
Sometimes we cannot obtain raw scores but we
obtain the ranking of the subjects.
When the both the predictor and criterion
variables are rankings, use either the Spearman
rho correlation.
For example, to explore the relationship
between using marijuana in schools and
students’ attitudes. Here we may be unable to
obtain the raw scores of the subjects on these
two variables but we may rank them on these.
19. Point Biserial Correlation
When the predictor variable is a natural (real)
dichotomy (two categories) and the criterion
variable is interval or continuous, the point
biserial correlation is used.
20. Biserial Correlation:
When the predictor variable is a natural (real)
dichotomy (two categories) and the criterion
variable is interval or continuous, the point biserial
correlation is used.
It is calculated when we have scores of the subjects
on one variable or trait, but on the second variable,
we have to put them into a dichotomy
(dichotomous means 'cut into two parts'), which
means that we have to place them in either this or
another category.
22. When the both the predictor and criterion
variables are natural dichotomies (two
categories), the phi correlation is used.
If the dichotomies are artificial, the tetrachoric
correlation is used.This is rarely the case in
educational research
23. Tetrachoric r / Cross- Leged Panel Correlation
Sometimes we may get both the variables dichotomous (or a
2 x 2 or four-fold table). Then we have to compute
tetrachoric r.
Here our both variables are not measured in scores but are
capable of being separated into two categories. For
example, we may wish to discover the relationship between
intelligence (above average/below average) and Lge
proficiency (above average/below average).
Here we have, as per our research objectives, decided to
study the relationship between two categories of
intelligence and two categories of Lge Profiency.
Phi Correlation
25. Partial Correlation :
In correlational approach, mostly the third variable
problem refrains us from drawing inferences on the
basis of the observed r between two variables.
According to Christensen (1994), "the third variable
problem refers to the fact that the two variables
may be correlated not because they are causally
related but because some third variable caused
both of them."
For example, it is found that reading ability and
vocabulary are highly correlated, but, in fact, both
of these variables are strongly affected by
intelligence.
27. Analysis and Interpretation of Data :
The next step is to treat the data statistically by applying
appropriate correlational technique to compute the correlation
between the two sets of scores.
Then we interpret our findings in the light of:
The Size of the Correlation: The degree or size or strength of
the relationship between two variables is expressed by the
coefficient of correlation.
The Direction of the Correlation: You can find the two
variables correlated in either positive or negative direction.
Significance Level of Correlation:
We first compute the standard error (SE) of the correlation
and then multiply this SE by 1.96 or by 2.56 (for .01 level of
significance).
The obtained correlation is considered significant if it is larger
than the value obtained by the multiplication of SE with
either 1.96 or 2.56.
28. More Principles to Remember
A correlation is reported as r such as r=.36.
In reporting correlations in research reports
you report both the r value and the p
29. More Principles to Remember
The statistical probability is reported as p.
Some researchers report the probability of the
correlation happening by chance was p>.05 (more
than 5 out of 100) or p<.05 (less than 5 out of 100)
30. Interpretation of the
Strength of Correlations
.00 - .20 –VeryWeak
.21 - .40 –Weak
.41 - .60 – Moderate
.61 - .80 – Strong
.81 – 1.00 -Very Strong
Different statisticians may have similar
but slightly different scales
.
31. Correlations
Scatter plots are often used to depict
correlations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Weight
Caloriesperday
This chart shows
a strong positive
correlation
32. Correlations
Scatter plots are often used to depict
correlations
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Weight
MinutesofExerciseperday
This chart shows
a strong negative
correlation
33. Correlations
Scatter plots are often used to depict
correlations
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Weight
MilesfromKrispyCreme
This chart shows
virtually no
correlation
34. How can I calculate
correlations?
Excel has a statistical function. It calculates
Pearson Product Moment correlations.
SPSS (a statistical software program for personal
computers used by graduate students) calculates
correlations.
36. Can study things that cannot practically be
studied experimentally: Gender, culture, etc.
Can study things that cannot ethically be
experimented on: Brain damage, trauma, etc.