Multiversion Concurrency Control TechniquesRaj vardhan
Multiversion Concurrency Control Techniques
Q. What is multiversion concurrency control technique? Explain how multiversion concurrency control can be achieved by using Time Stamp Ordering.
ACID properties
Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability
Transactions should possess several properties, often called the ACID properties; they should be enforced by the concurrency control and recovery methods of the DBMS.
A brief introduction to Process synchronization in Operating Systems with classical examples and solutions using semaphores. A good starting tutorial for beginners.
This presentation discusses the following topics:
What is Recovery ?
Database Recovery techniques
System log
Working of Commit and Roll back
Recovery techniques
Backup techniques
DDBMS, characteristics, Centralized vs. Distributed Database, Homogeneous DDBMS, Heterogeneous DDBMS, Advantages, Disadvantages, What is parallel database, Data fragmentation, Replication, Distribution Transaction
Multiversion Concurrency Control TechniquesRaj vardhan
Multiversion Concurrency Control Techniques
Q. What is multiversion concurrency control technique? Explain how multiversion concurrency control can be achieved by using Time Stamp Ordering.
ACID properties
Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability
Transactions should possess several properties, often called the ACID properties; they should be enforced by the concurrency control and recovery methods of the DBMS.
A brief introduction to Process synchronization in Operating Systems with classical examples and solutions using semaphores. A good starting tutorial for beginners.
This presentation discusses the following topics:
What is Recovery ?
Database Recovery techniques
System log
Working of Commit and Roll back
Recovery techniques
Backup techniques
DDBMS, characteristics, Centralized vs. Distributed Database, Homogeneous DDBMS, Heterogeneous DDBMS, Advantages, Disadvantages, What is parallel database, Data fragmentation, Replication, Distribution Transaction
Inheritance is the mechanism that allows programmers to create new classes from existing class. By using inheritance programmers can re-use code they've already written.
Lean Concepts & Agile Software MethodologiesBrad Smith
Presentation introducing the core concepts of Lean in manufacturing and an exploration of the various Agile software engineering approaches which apply these principles to increase the responsiveness of product development.
Download and reference notes for full detail.
This presentation is about a lecture I gave within the "Software systems and services" immigration course at the Gran Sasso Science Institute, L'Aquila (Italy): http://cs.gssi.infn.it/.
http://www.ivanomalavolta.com
This presentation provides useful and beneficial information related to software development companies. It defines Software development methodology and elaborates various methodologies adopted by software application development companies, web application development companies, custom software development services in India.
Courtesy: Shreyans Agrawal (ifour.shreyans.agrawal@gmail.com)
http://www.ifour-consultancy.com
http://www.ifourtechnolab.com
This will tell about the three of the Protocols(Lock-Based Protocols, Timestamp-Based Protocols, Validation-Based Protocols) of Concurrency Control used in the database management system.
Transactions
Definition of a Transaction
Properties of Transactions (ACID)
States of Transaction
Distributed Concurrency Control
Definition of Concurrency Control
Concurrency side effects
Isolation Levels
Locking-Based Concurrency Control
Timestamp-Based Concurrency Control
Optimistic concurrency control in Distributed Systemsmridul mishra
What is Optimistic concurrency control, how and why it is applied to distributed systems, the Kung Robinson algorithm overview and the advantages-disadvantages have been covered
Powerpoint Presentaion on Concurrency Control Protocols,
is part of Btech 3rd year DBMS syllabus.
This slide is part of assignment provided during session 2018-2019
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
2. ABSTRACT
• Nowadays, distributed Databases have taken concentration in the database research.
Data distribution and replication offer opportunities for improving performance
through parallel query execution and load balancing as well as increasing the
availability of data.These opportunities have played a major role in motivating the
design of the current generation of database machines.The purpose of this study is to
propose an approach that absolutely increases the performance of real-time
distributed data service.The centralized real time database is based on critical closed
loop control system.To overcome this problem, we proposed a model/ system called
user control distributed database model which try to stimulate the overload
transaction during run time.Therefore, the present system will be a step towards fulfil
the needs of critical conditions like overload or run-time errors in context of distributed
database system.
4. INTRODUCTION
• In the today’s world the real-time systems are wrapper ample range of technological
work like networking, telecommunication, censor monitoring, traffic signals and e-
governance etc.The centralized real-time databases are not only needs to read and
process the data, but also to proceed in a timely manner without producing unexpected
errors. In traditional databases mostly become failure due to work load or resource
contention. In this study, we propose a user control system approach for distributed
database which tries to reduce run time errors during overload with design quality
service during transaction.The base for this study is taken by the model of M. Srinivasan
and R. Manohar (2012) and Lam, Kamyiu et al. (1996) about performance of
concurrency control Mechanisms in centralized database systems. In recent times,
distributed databases have taken attention in the database research area due to
demanding distributed data storage. Because data distribution and replication offer
opportunities for improving performance through parallel query execution and load
balancing as well as increasing the availability of data.These opportunities have played
a major role in motivating the design of the current generation of database machines.
5. CONCURRENCY CONTROL
CONCURRENCY: In computer science, concurrency is a property of
systems in which several computations are executing simultaneously, and
potentially interacting with each other.
• Concurrency control is the process of managing simultaneous operations
on the database without having them interfere with one another.
• Concurrent access is relatively easy if all users are only reading data, as
there is no way that they can interfere with one another.
6. PURPOSE OF CONCURRENCY CONTROL
• To enforce Isolation (through mutual exclusion) among conflicting
transactions.
• To preserve database consistency through consistency preserving execution
of transactions.
• To resolve read-write and write-write conflicts.
In concurrent execution environment ifT1 conflicts withT2 over a
data item A, then the existing concurrency control decides ifT1 orT2 should
get the A and if the other transaction is rolled-back or waits.
7. Why we need Concurrency Control??
• Simultaneous execution of transactions over a shared database can
create several data integrity and consistency problems:
• Lost Updates.
• Uncommitted Data.
• Inconsistent retrievals.
8. When we need Concurrency Control??
1. The amount of data is sufficiently great that at any given time only
fraction of the data can be in primary memory & rest should be swapped
from secondary memory as needed.
2. Even if the entire database can be present in primary memory, there may
be multiple processes.
10. LOCK-BASED PROTOCOLS
• Transactions indicate their intentions by requesting locks from the scheduler
(called lock manager).
• Locks are either read lock (rl) [also called shared lock] or write lock (wl) [also called
exclusive lock]
• Read locks and write locks conflict (because Read andWrite operations are
incompatible
rl wl
rl yesno
wl no no
• Locking works nicely to allow concurrent processing of transactions
11. Two-Phase Locking (2PL)
ATransaction locks an object before using it.
When an object is locked by another transaction, the requesting transaction must
wait.
When a transaction releases a lock, it may not request another lock.
Obtain lock
Release lock
Lock point
Phase 1 Phase 2
BEGIN END
No.oflocks
12. Strict 2PL
Hold locks until the end.
Obtain lock
Release lock
BEGIN END
Transaction
duration
period of
data item
use
No.oflocks
13. Centralized 2PL
• There is only one 2PL scheduler in the distributed system.
• Lock requests are issued to the central scheduler.
Data Processors at
participating sites Coordinating TM Central Site LM
14. Distributed 2PL
• 2PL schedulers are placed at each site. Each scheduler handles lock requests for data
at that site.
• A transaction may read any of the replicated copies of item x, by obtaining a read lock
on one of the copies of x.Writing into x requires obtaining write locks for all copies of
x.
Coordinating TM Participating LMs Participating DPs
15. This is the most commonly used concurrency protocol. This protocol uses
either SystemTime or Logical Counter as a timestamp.
Lock-based protocols manage the order between the conflicting pairs
among transactions at the time of execution, whereas timestamp-based
protocols start working as soon as a transaction is created.
Every transaction has a timestamp associated with it, and the ordering is
determined by the age of the transaction.
Every data item is given the latest read and write-timestamp. This lets the
system know when the last ‘read and write’ operation was performed on
the data item.
Timestamp based algorithm uses timestamp to serialize the execution of
concurrent transactions.
Timestamp-Based Protocols
16. Timestamp-Based Protocols
• The timestamp ordering protocol ensures that any
conflicting read and write operations are executed in
timestamp order.
• Suppose a transactionTi issues a read(Q)
1. IfTS(Ti) W-timestamp(Q), then Ti needs to read a value of Q that was
already overwritten.
Hence, the read operation is rejected, and Ti is rolled back.
2. IfTS(Ti) W-timestamp(Q), then the read operation is executed, and R-
timestamp(Q) is set to max(R-timestamp(Q),TS(Ti)).
17. Timestamp-Based Protocols(Cont.)
• Suppose that transaction Ti issues write(Q).
1. IfTS(Ti) < R-timestamp(Q), then the value of Q that Ti is producing was needed
previously, and the system assumed that that value would never be produced.
Hence, the write operation is rejected, and Ti is rolled back.
2. IfTS(Ti) <W-timestamp(Q), then Ti is attempting to write an obsolete value of
Q.
Hence, this write operation is rejected, and Ti is rolled back.
3. Otherwise, the write operation is executed, andW-timestamp(Q) is set to
TS(Ti).
• If a transaction Ti is rolled back by the concurrency control scheme as
result of wrong distribution of either a read or write operation, the
system assigns the transaction Ti a new timestamp and restarts it.
18. Advantages:
–Schedules are serializable (like 2PL protocols)
–No waiting for transaction, thus, no deadlocks!
Disadvantages:
-- Starvation is possible (if the same transaction is
continually aborted and restarted)
Timestamp-Based Protocols
20. Validation-Based Protocol
• Execution of transaction Ti is done in three phases.
1. Read and execution phase:Transaction Ti writes only to
temporary local variables
2. Validation phase:Transaction Ti performs a ``validation test''
to determine if local variables can be written without violating
serializability.
3. Write phase: If Ti is validated, the updates are applied to the
database; otherwise,Ti is rolled back.
• The three phases of concurrently executing transactions can be interleaved, but each
transaction must go through the three phases in that order.
• Assume for simplicity that the validation and write phase occur together, atomically and
serially
• I.e., only one transaction executes validation/write at a time.
• Also called as optimistic concurrency control since transaction executes fully in the hope
that all will go well during validation
21. Validation-Based Protocol
• Each transactionTi has 3 timestamps
• Start(Ti) : the time whenTi started its execution
• Validation(Ti): the time whenTi entered its validation phase
• Finish(Ti) : the time whenTi finished its write phase
• Serializability order is determined by timestamp given at validation time, to
increase concurrency.
• ThusTS(Ti) is given the value ofValidation(Ti).
• This protocol is useful and gives greater degree of concurrency if probability of
conflicts is low.
• because the serializability order is not pre-decided, and relatively few
transactions will have to be rolled back.
22. ValidationTest forTransaction Tj
• If for all Ti withTS (Ti) <TS (Tj) either one of the following condition holds:
• finish(Ti) < start(Tj)
• start(Tj) < finish(Ti) < validation(Tj) and the set of data items written by
Ti does not intersect with the set of data items read by Tj.
then validation succeeds and Tj can be committed. Otherwise, validation
fails and Tj is aborted.
24. Deadlock
• A transaction is deadlocked if it is blocked and will remain blocked until there is
intervention.
• Locking-based CC algorithms may cause deadlocks.
• TO-based algorithms that involve waiting may cause deadlocks.
• Wait-for graph
• If transaction Ti waits for another transaction Tj to release a lock on an entity, then
Ti → Tj inWFG.
Ti Tj
25. Deadlock Management
• Ignore
• Let the application programmer deal with it, or restart the system
• Prevention
• Guaranteeing that deadlocks can never occur in the first place. Check transaction
when it is initiated. Requires no run time support.
• Avoidance
• Detecting potential deadlocks in advance and taking action to insure that
deadlock will not occur. Requires run time support.
• Detection and Recovery
• Allowing deadlocks to form and then finding and breaking them.As in the
avoidance scheme, this requires run time support.
26. Deadlock Prevention
• All resources which may be needed by a transaction must be predeclared.
• The system must guarantee that none of the resources will be needed by an
ongoing transaction.
• Resources must only be reserved, but not necessarily allocated a priori
• Unsuitability of the scheme in database environment
• Suitable for systems that have no provisions for undoing processes.
• Evaluation:
– Reduced concurrency due to preallocation
– Evaluating whether an allocation is safe leads to added overhead.
– Difficult to determine (partial order)
+ No transaction rollback or restart is involved.
27. CONCLUSION
• Concurrency Control is a problem that arises when multiple processes are involved in
any part of the system. In most commercial systems, the most popular mechanism
for concurrency control is two-phase locking. In this chapter, comparative study
among different variants of lock algorithm, time stamp ordering and optimistic
concurrency control algorithms which have been implemented over last 20 years in
distributed, mobile databases have been done based on various chosen parameters
like reduced blocking, consistency, load balancing, efficiency, security etc. . Due to
the many interesting ideas that come into play in distributed database systems in the
context of replication and reliability, research in concurrency control is continuing.
Some studies are being done for object-oriented systems while others are dealing
with semantics of transactions and weaker form of consistency.
• The combination of these results suggests that “optimistic locking,” where
transactions lock remote copies of data only as they enter into the commit protocol
(at the risk of end-of-transaction deadlocks), may actually be the best performer in
replicated databases where messages are costly,We plan to investigate this
assumption in the future.
28. REFERENCES
• Arun KumarYadav and Ajay Agarwal,AnApproach for Concurrency Control in Distributed
Database System, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication,Vol. 1, No.
1, pp. 137-141, 2010.
• Bernstein, P.A., Hadzilacos,V. and Goddman, N. Concurrency Control and Recovery in
Database Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., U.S.A. 1987.
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrency_control
• www.slideshare.net