Beyond MARC: BIBFRAME and the Future of Bibliographic DataEmily Nimsakont
The Bibliographic Framework Initiative, or BIBFRAME, is intended to provide a replacement to the MARC format as an encoding standard for library catalogs. Its aim is to move library data into a Linked Data format, allowing it to interact with other data on the Web. In this session, Emily Nimsakont, the NLC’s Cataloging Librarian, will cover the basics of BIBFRAME, describe what it can provide for users of library catalogs that MARC can’t, and outline what librarians should be aware of regarding this change in the cataloging landscape.
FRSAD Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data modelMarcia Zeng
Presentation on the modeling approach of the FRSAD (Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data) model; the entities, attributes, and relationships defined. Discussions of the implications of the FRSAD model for interoperability and future R&D considered. Presented for the ALCTS CCS Subject Analysis Committee, ALA 2010 Annual Conference, Washington, D.C. June 28, 2010
Beyond MARC: BIBFRAME and the Future of Bibliographic DataEmily Nimsakont
The Bibliographic Framework Initiative, or BIBFRAME, is intended to provide a replacement to the MARC format as an encoding standard for library catalogs. Its aim is to move library data into a Linked Data format, allowing it to interact with other data on the Web. In this session, Emily Nimsakont, the NLC’s Cataloging Librarian, will cover the basics of BIBFRAME, describe what it can provide for users of library catalogs that MARC can’t, and outline what librarians should be aware of regarding this change in the cataloging landscape.
FRSAD Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data modelMarcia Zeng
Presentation on the modeling approach of the FRSAD (Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data) model; the entities, attributes, and relationships defined. Discussions of the implications of the FRSAD model for interoperability and future R&D considered. Presented for the ALCTS CCS Subject Analysis Committee, ALA 2010 Annual Conference, Washington, D.C. June 28, 2010
مقدمة إلى الميتاداتا والتعريف بأنواعها ووظائف الميتاداتا. ثم عرض للتعاريف المختلفة لمعيار دبلن كور وعناصره الخمسة عشر و تقسيمها واستخدامات دبلن كور، ومقيداته، وإرشادات توجيهية لإدخال بيانات تسجيلة دبلن كور وأخيرا نقاط قور وضعف معيار دبلن كور
دور المكتبة الوطنية في تطبيق تقنين وصف المصادر وإتاحتها دراسة للمتطلبات والإم...kholoud Mamdouh
دور المكتبة الوطنية في تطبيق تقنين و صف المصادر وإتاحتها دراسة للمتطلبات والإمكانات
إعداد الباحثة خلود ممدوح إسماعيل حسن .. إشراف د. مصطفى أمين حسام الدين
السادة أعضاء لجنة المناقشة
أ. د. محمد فتحي عبد الهادي ... أ. د. رؤوف هلال
A Brief Introduction to Encoded Archival DescriptionKevin Schlottmann
A basic presentation prepared for Queens College (CUNY) Graduate School of Library and Information Science, May 2011. Describes what EAD is, how it is created, and how it is implemented.
URI FAQs = أسئلة تتردد باستمرار عن المعرف الموحد للمصدر / ترجمة محمد عبد ...Muhammad Muawwad
اهتم معيار وصف وإتاحة المصادر RDA ببناء العلاقات بين التسجيلات الببليوجرافية، بينما البيانات المترابطة هي التقنية الت تنسئ العلاقات بين البيانات. ولإنشاء البيانات المترابطة، ينبغي أن تصبح الويب شبكة من البياناتبدلا من شبكة من الوثائق. وتعتبر المعرفات URIs هامة في عالم البيانات المترابطة باعتبار أن كل مفهوم ينبغي أن يكون له معرف URI الخاص به.
وتتناول هذه المقالة مجموعة من الأسئلة التي تطرح باستمرار عن المعرف الموحد للمصدر URI مثل: ما هو المعرف الموحد للمصدر، ،ما أشكال هذا المعرف، الفرق بينه وبين عنوان الموقع الإلكتروني URL، وما هي معرفات URIs التي تنطبق على البيانات المترابطة، وكيف يتم إضافة رابط في صففحة ويب. وهل تطبق نظك المكتبات الآلية معرفات URIs، هل هناك موردين من يوفر هذه المعرفات. وما هي حقول مارك الببليوجرافية والاستنادية وكذلك الحقول الفرعية المختلفة التي يمكن إضافة إليها معرفات. وما علاقة هذا المعرفURI بالحقول الفرعية $4, $1, $0 بالإضافة إلى غيرها من الأسئلة.
An overview of FRBR focused on the WEMI model, User Tasks, and cataloging as service. Also touches on the new Library Reference Model, LRM and its impact on FRBR.
A basic introduction to taxonomies/controlled vocabularies, what they are and how they are used. Presented originally at the Society of Indexers conference, July 2008.
This is intended to be a two day workshop on RDA. This workshop will explore RDA with a specific focus on theories, practicalities, authority work and hands on cataloging. The workshop will take the student through understanding the theories behind RDA and then cataloging by RDA standards.
A presentation by Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Delhi University, during National Workshop on Library 2.0: A Global Information Hub, Feb 5-6, 2009 at PRL Ahmedabad
Presentation given on March 12, 2013 by Marjorie M.K. Hlava of Access Innovations, Inc. as a webinar for the San Francisco chapter of the Special Libraries Association.
NISO Webinar:
Experimenting with BIBFRAME: Reports from Early Adopters
About the Webinar
In May 2011, the Library of Congress officially launched a new modeling initiative, Bibliographic Framework Initiative, as a linked data alternative to MARC. The Library then announced in November 2012 the proposed model, called BIBFRAME. Since then, the library world is moving from mainly theorizing about the BIBFRAME model to attempts to implement practical experimentation and testing. This experimentation is iterative, and continues to shape the model so that it’s stable enough and broadly acceptable enough for adoption.
In this webinar, several institutions will share their progress in experimenting with BIBFRAME within their library system. They will discuss the existing, developing, and planned projects happening at their institutions. Challenges and opportunities in exploring and implementing BIBFRAME in their institutions will be discussed as well.
Agenda
Introduction
Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO
Experimental Mode: The National Library of Medicine and experiences with BIBFRAME
Nancy Fallgren, Metadata Specialist Librarian, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
Exploring BIBFRAME at a Small Academic Library
Jeremy Nelson, Metadata and Systems Librarian, Colorado College
Working with BIBFRAME for discovery and production: Linked data for Libraries/Linked Data for Production
Nancy Lorimer, Head, Metadata Dept, Stanford University Libraries
This presentation is specially designed to facilitate the new and growing MLIS students of AIOU Islamabad, which have to face problems and difficulties in their studies.
مقدمة إلى الميتاداتا والتعريف بأنواعها ووظائف الميتاداتا. ثم عرض للتعاريف المختلفة لمعيار دبلن كور وعناصره الخمسة عشر و تقسيمها واستخدامات دبلن كور، ومقيداته، وإرشادات توجيهية لإدخال بيانات تسجيلة دبلن كور وأخيرا نقاط قور وضعف معيار دبلن كور
دور المكتبة الوطنية في تطبيق تقنين وصف المصادر وإتاحتها دراسة للمتطلبات والإم...kholoud Mamdouh
دور المكتبة الوطنية في تطبيق تقنين و صف المصادر وإتاحتها دراسة للمتطلبات والإمكانات
إعداد الباحثة خلود ممدوح إسماعيل حسن .. إشراف د. مصطفى أمين حسام الدين
السادة أعضاء لجنة المناقشة
أ. د. محمد فتحي عبد الهادي ... أ. د. رؤوف هلال
A Brief Introduction to Encoded Archival DescriptionKevin Schlottmann
A basic presentation prepared for Queens College (CUNY) Graduate School of Library and Information Science, May 2011. Describes what EAD is, how it is created, and how it is implemented.
URI FAQs = أسئلة تتردد باستمرار عن المعرف الموحد للمصدر / ترجمة محمد عبد ...Muhammad Muawwad
اهتم معيار وصف وإتاحة المصادر RDA ببناء العلاقات بين التسجيلات الببليوجرافية، بينما البيانات المترابطة هي التقنية الت تنسئ العلاقات بين البيانات. ولإنشاء البيانات المترابطة، ينبغي أن تصبح الويب شبكة من البياناتبدلا من شبكة من الوثائق. وتعتبر المعرفات URIs هامة في عالم البيانات المترابطة باعتبار أن كل مفهوم ينبغي أن يكون له معرف URI الخاص به.
وتتناول هذه المقالة مجموعة من الأسئلة التي تطرح باستمرار عن المعرف الموحد للمصدر URI مثل: ما هو المعرف الموحد للمصدر، ،ما أشكال هذا المعرف، الفرق بينه وبين عنوان الموقع الإلكتروني URL، وما هي معرفات URIs التي تنطبق على البيانات المترابطة، وكيف يتم إضافة رابط في صففحة ويب. وهل تطبق نظك المكتبات الآلية معرفات URIs، هل هناك موردين من يوفر هذه المعرفات. وما هي حقول مارك الببليوجرافية والاستنادية وكذلك الحقول الفرعية المختلفة التي يمكن إضافة إليها معرفات. وما علاقة هذا المعرفURI بالحقول الفرعية $4, $1, $0 بالإضافة إلى غيرها من الأسئلة.
An overview of FRBR focused on the WEMI model, User Tasks, and cataloging as service. Also touches on the new Library Reference Model, LRM and its impact on FRBR.
A basic introduction to taxonomies/controlled vocabularies, what they are and how they are used. Presented originally at the Society of Indexers conference, July 2008.
This is intended to be a two day workshop on RDA. This workshop will explore RDA with a specific focus on theories, practicalities, authority work and hands on cataloging. The workshop will take the student through understanding the theories behind RDA and then cataloging by RDA standards.
A presentation by Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Delhi University, during National Workshop on Library 2.0: A Global Information Hub, Feb 5-6, 2009 at PRL Ahmedabad
Presentation given on March 12, 2013 by Marjorie M.K. Hlava of Access Innovations, Inc. as a webinar for the San Francisco chapter of the Special Libraries Association.
NISO Webinar:
Experimenting with BIBFRAME: Reports from Early Adopters
About the Webinar
In May 2011, the Library of Congress officially launched a new modeling initiative, Bibliographic Framework Initiative, as a linked data alternative to MARC. The Library then announced in November 2012 the proposed model, called BIBFRAME. Since then, the library world is moving from mainly theorizing about the BIBFRAME model to attempts to implement practical experimentation and testing. This experimentation is iterative, and continues to shape the model so that it’s stable enough and broadly acceptable enough for adoption.
In this webinar, several institutions will share their progress in experimenting with BIBFRAME within their library system. They will discuss the existing, developing, and planned projects happening at their institutions. Challenges and opportunities in exploring and implementing BIBFRAME in their institutions will be discussed as well.
Agenda
Introduction
Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO
Experimental Mode: The National Library of Medicine and experiences with BIBFRAME
Nancy Fallgren, Metadata Specialist Librarian, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
Exploring BIBFRAME at a Small Academic Library
Jeremy Nelson, Metadata and Systems Librarian, Colorado College
Working with BIBFRAME for discovery and production: Linked data for Libraries/Linked Data for Production
Nancy Lorimer, Head, Metadata Dept, Stanford University Libraries
This presentation is specially designed to facilitate the new and growing MLIS students of AIOU Islamabad, which have to face problems and difficulties in their studies.
From: Linked Data: what cataloguers need to know. A CIG event. 25 November 2013, Birmingham. #cigld
http://www.cilip.org.uk/cataloguing-and-indexing-group/events/linked-data-what-cataloguers-need-know-cig-event
Accompanying write-up from Catalogue & Index 174: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1449460/
Leveraging Exhibitions as a Needs-Based Skill Development Program in Librarie...Sara Sterkenburg
This presentation was delivered on June 24, 2015 at the 2015 Rare Book and Manuscript Pre-conference in Oakland, CA.
Summary:
In 2014, Vanderbilt’s exhibition team discussed changing its curatorial model to be less aligned with the museum model, and more oriented toward the 21st century technologies demanded widely by our users. We designed the current season around this idea, leveraging ourselves as a skill-development program. We focused on teaching XML markup, version control using Github, copyright, open access, and descriptive metadata.
Challenging budgets push many institutions to rely on webinars to teach new concepts, often with minimal results. The big learning curve of some technologies calls for hands-on learning in a project environment. This can be jump-started by exhibition programs in special collections libraries, often with few people and at minimal cost. I will discuss our process, including workflow, training, roadblocks/troubleshooting, and takeaways.
From Feb 19 2014 NISO Virtual Conference: NISO Virtual Conference: The Semantic Web Coming of Age: Technologies and Implementations
Kevin Ford, Semantic Web Applications in Libraries: The Road to BIBFRAME
Subject Headings & Classification, or, Why librarians don't seem to think lik...Naomi Young
Intended for an undergraduate audience, this is a brief introduction to the principles of organization; an overview of the Library of Congress Classification system (LCC) and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH); a discussion of some oddities and limitations of those systems and how they have developed. Concludes with an introduction to how to browse leisure reading in an academic library.
An In-depth Analysis of Tags and Controlled Metadata for Book SearchToine Bogers
Book search for information needs that go beyond standard bibliographic data is far from a solved problem. Such complex information needs often cover a combination of different aspects, such as specific genres or plot elements, engagement or novelty. By design, subject information in controlled vocabularies is not always adequate in covering such complex needs, and social tags have been proposed as an alternative. In this paper we present a large-scale empirical comparison and in-depth analysis of the value of controlled vocabularies and tags for book retrieval using a test collection of over 2 million book records and over 330 real-world book information needs. We find that while tags and controlled vocabulary terms provide complementary performance, tags perform better overall. However, this is not due to a popularity effect; instead, tags are better at matching the language of regular users. Finally, we perform a detailed failure analysis and show, using tags and controlled vocabulary terms, that some request types are inherently more diffcult to solve than others.
(Paper presentation @ iConference 2017, Wuhan, China)
Presentation given at the CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group Conference 2014 "The Impact of Metadata" #cig14 on Monday 8 September 2014 at the University of Kent, Canterbury.
Marc formats : Facilitating sharing of Catalogue RecordsOtuoma Peter
This item was presented by Otuoma Sanya as a guest speaker to Information Science Students at Meru University of Science and Technology in November 2015.
RDA Implementation at Edinburgh University Library, 2014/ Alasdair MacDonald...CIGScotland
Presented at the RDA for Implementers Conference, 27 May 2015 at the National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh. Organised by the Cataloguing & Indexing Group in Scotland
From: Linked Data: what cataloguers need to know. A CIG event. 25 November 2013, Birmingham. #cigld
http://www.cilip.org.uk/cataloguing-and-indexing-group/events/linked-data-what-cataloguers-need-know-cig-event
Accompanying write-up from Catalogue & Index 174: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1449458/
APA CITATION &STYLE GUIDE Many Fisher College profes.docxboyfieldhouse
APA CITATION &
STYLE GUIDE
Many Fisher College professors require the APA style for papers. Check
with your professor about which format he or she expects you to use.
APA FORMATTING:
Purdue OWL provides guidelines for papers using APA style,
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Microsoft Word offers APA templates. Open Microsoft
Word. Select “New.” In the search box at the top of
the screen type “APA.” A couple of templates
will appear. Choose one.
The format of the paper usually includes the following
components in this order:
Title page (p.1)
Abstract (p.2)
Introduction (p.3) (beginning of text)
Method
Results
Discussion
References (after the last page of the text)
1
CITING MATERIALS WITH PROPER NOUNS IN APA
When citing materials in APA that have a proper noun that is
not the first word, it will be capitalized (ex. Spain, Prada, Toyota).
Liker, J.K. (2004). The Toyota way. New York: McGraw Hill.
For more information on plagiarism, visit Fisher College’s
publication: Plagiarism: a guidebook on responsible source citation.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/MagicHour/Fisher/Uploads/ByDate/2013/
June_2013/June_24th_2013/plagiarism92229.pdf
Remember to keep track of where you are getting your material.
If you use someone else’s idea, even if it is not a direct quote
(paraphrased), you need to give credit to the author(s).
Most Common APA Citation Components:
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Title (article, book, chapter, journal, etc.)
Date (published or created)
Publisher
Edition
Location of Publisher
Page Number(s)
Date Accessed (online)
2
APA IN-TEXT CITATIONS
Whenever you cite a book, magazine, scholarly journal, or other
source within the body of your paper, the In-Text citation will
reflect your References page.
Purdue OWL provides guidelines for In-Text citations using
APA style:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/
The following is an example of an In-Text citation with a known
author:
“A company spokesman used the wheel-and-spokes concept that
placed Martha at the center of the action” (Byron, 2002, p. 200).
According to Byron, (2002), “A company spokesman used the
wheel-and-spokes concept that placed Martha at the center of the
action” (p. 200).
The following is an example of an In-Text citation without a
known author:
“Her brand may be tarnished, but her empire grossed more than
$221 million last year” (“Meltdown for Ratings,” 2012).
APA IN-TEXT CITATION -- PARAPHRASING
When Andy Warhol walked into the kitchen, he grabbed a can
of Campbell’s soup from the pantry shelf (Matterson, 1981).
3
References: The last component of your paper that includes sources that
you used
APA REFERENCES EXAMPLES
CITING A SOURCE FROM AN ONLINE DATABASE
USING APA
STRUCTURE:
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Date of publication). Title of
article. Title of Journal, volume number (issue), page range.
Retrieved from http://databasewe.
About the Webinar
In the new models for describing information resources (FRBR, RDA, BIBFRAME), the conceptual essence of an item—referred to as a "Work"—is separated from the specific manifestations of the item—referred to as "Instances" or "Expressions". The work “Macbeth by Shakespeare” could have multiple forms or versions and exist in a variety of media, from a print copy of the play to a DVD of a live performance. Of equal importance in the new models is describing the relationship between a Work and its various Instances/Expressions.This represents an entirely different way of thinking about resource description for libraries and users.
While the new models are still in the early days of implementation, a number of efforts are already underway to describe resources using these new concepts and relationships. This webinar will explore how metadata descriptive systems are developing around the new notion of “Works”.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
1. BIBFRAME
and
Moving Away From MARC
Linked Data: what cataloguers need to know #cigld
CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group (CIG)
20 February 2015
Thomas Meehan
tom@aurochs.org @orangeaurochs
4. Why? (1)
• On the Record / Library of Congress Working
Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control
(January 2008)
• Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA
Test Coordinating Committee (June 2011)
"Demonstrate credible progress towards a
replacement for MARC".
5. Why? (2)
Storage
Manipulation
Display
Input
Exchange and distribution
Publication
"Lingua franca of library cataloguing"
"foundation for the future of bibliographic description
that happens on the web and in the networked world"
6. Why? (2)
Storage
Manipulation
Display
Input
Exchange and distribution
Publication
"Lingua franca of library cataloguing"
"foundation for the future of bibliographic
description that happens on the web and in the
networked world"
7. Why? (3)
Conversion of MARC or replacement of MARC?
For all libraries everywhere?
For all bibliographic data?
8. Who
Library of Congress
Partners (Early Experimenters),
among others:
• British Library,
• Deutsche Nationalbibliothek,
• George Washington University,
• National Library of Medicine,
• OCLC,
• and Princeton University
Consultants:
• Zepheira
Implementers and Testers,
among others:
• National Library of Medicine
(decided to fork)
• George Washington University
• Biblioteca Nacional de Cuba
“José Martí” (BNJM)
• Stanford University
10. FRBR and BIBFRAME Models
FRBR
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
Work
Instance
Annotation
BIBFRAME
11. BIBFRAME Model: Resource
A BIBFRAME Resource can be anything: a Work, Instance, Authority, or
Annotation
bf:authorizedAccessPoint
bf:identifier
bf:label
bf:relatedTo
http://bibframe.org/vocab/Resource.html
12. BIBFRAME Model: Work 1/2
Work: A resource reflecting a conceptual essence of the cataloging resource. (A FRBR Work/Expression)
bf:classificationLcc
bf:contains
bf:creator
bf:hasDerivative
bf:note
bf:language
bf:originalVersion
bf:relatedWork
bf:series
bf:title
bf:workTitle
bf:subject
14. BIBFRAME Model: Instance 1/2
Instance: A resource reflecting an individual, material embodiment of
the Work. (A FRBR Manifestation)
bf:contributor
bf:dimensions
bf:extent
bf:isbn10
bf:isbn13
bf:isbn
bf:publication
bf:instanceOf
bf:titleStatement
http://bibframe.org/vocab/Instance.html
15. BIBFRAME Model: Instance 2/2 (pub)
ex:wk17082740 a bf:Work ;
hasInstance _:inst001 .
_:inst001 a bf:Instance ;
bf:publication _:pub002 .
_:pub002 a bf:Provider ;
bf:copyrightDate "c1980.";
bf:providerName _:provName003 ;
bf:providerPlace _:provPlace004 .
_:provName003 a bf:Organization ;
bf:label "D.W. Teske" .
_:provPlace004 a bf:Place ;
bf:label "Manchester, Iowa" .
(Example adapted from http://bibframe.org/vocab/publication.html)
16. BIBFRAME Model: Authority (Person)
Authority: Representation of a key concept or thing. Works and Instances, for
example, have defined relationships to these concepts and things.
bf:hasAuthority
bf:authorizedAccessPoint
http://bibframe.org/vocab/Authority.html
http://bibframe.org/documentation/bibframe-authority/
17. More on BIBFRAME Authorities
Direct Approach
ex:wk666 a bf:Work ;
bf:creator <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79049248> .
Indirect Approach, or, The lightweight abstraction layer
ex:wk666 a bf:Work ;
bf:creator ex:person99 .
ex:person99 a bf:Person ;
authorizedAccessPoint "Waugh, Evelyn,1903-1966." ;
hasAuthority <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79049248> .
18. Even More on BIBFRAME Authorities
Work creator
LC
Authority
Work creator
Bibframe
Authority
hasAuthority
LC
Authority
19. What is a BIBFRAME Person?
A. A person
B. An identity
C. A controlled personal name
D. An RDF document
20. BIBFRAME Model: Annotation
Annotation: Resource that asserts additional information about other BIBFRAME
resource.
bf:annotates
bf:annotationAssertedBy
bf:annotationBody
bf:annotationSource
bf:annotationDate
http://bibframe.org/vocab/Annotation.html
http://bibframe.org/documentation/annotations/
21. BIBFRAME Annotations Example
ex:wk005 a bf:Work ;
bf:hasAnnotation ex:ann010 .
ex:ann010 a bf:Summary ;
bf:annotates ex:wk005 ;
bf:annotationAssertedBy <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/organizations/ukluc> ;
bf:annotationSource <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dbpedia> ;
bf:summary < http://dbpedia.org/resource/ Decline_and_Fall > ;
bf:annotationDate "20131125" ;
bf:startOfSummary "Decline and Fall is a novel by the English author Evelyn Waugh,
first published in 1928. It was Waugh's first published novel; an earlier attempt, entitled The
Temple at Thatch, was destroyed by Waugh while still in manuscript form. Decline and Fall is
based in part on Waugh's undergraduate years at Hertford College, Oxford, and his experience as
a teacher in Wales. It is a social satire that employs the author's characteristic black humour in
lampooning various features of British society in the 1920s. The novel's title is a contraction of
Edward Gibbon's The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. " .
22. BIBFRAME Example
MARC
01260cam a2200265 a 4500
001 14920419
005 20090827103824.0
008 070709s2008 ilua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2007027845
020 $a0838909507 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a9780838909508 (pbk. : alk. paper)
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dDLC
050 00 $aZ666.6$b.M39 2008
082 00 $a025.3$222
100 1 $aMaxwell, Robert L.,$d1957-
245 10 $aFRBR :$ba guide for the perplexed /$cRobert L. Maxwell.
260 $aChicago :$bAmerican Library Association,$c2008.
300 $avii, 151 p. :$bill. ;$c23 cm.
500 $aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
505 0 $aThe entity-relationship model -- The FRBR entities -- Relationships -- User tasks -- The
FRBR model and the existing MARC and AACR2-based cataloging model.
650 0 $aFRBR (Conceptual model)
856 41 $3Table of contents only$uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0722/2007027845.html
906 $a7$bcbc$corignew$d1$eecip$f20$gy-gencatlg
925 0 $aacquire$b2 shelf copies$xpolicy default
955 $alh39 2007-07-06$ilh39 2007-07-06$elh39 2007-07-09 to CIP (Dewey completed)$aps10
2008-02-14 1 copy rec'd., to CIP ver.$fpv06 2008-02-29 (telework) CIP ver to BCCD$ald11 2008-09-04
copy 2 added
23. BIBFRAME Example
Turtle
@prefix bf: <http://bibframe.org/vocab/> .
@prefix madsrdf: <http://www.loc.gov/mads/rdf/v1#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix relators: <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/> .
@prefix xml: <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419> a bf:Text,
bf:Work ;
bf:authorizedAccessPoint "Maxwell, Robert L., 1957- FRBR :a guide for the perplexed",
"maxwellrobertl1957frbraguidefortheperplexedengworktext"@x-bf-hash ;
bf:classification [ a bf:Classification ;
bf:classificationEdition "22",
"full" ;
bf:classificationNumber "025.3" ;
bf:classificationScheme <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classSchemes/ddc> ;
bf:label "025.3" ] ;
bf:classificationLcc <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/classification/Z666.6> ;
bf:creator [ a bf:Person ;
bf:authorizedAccessPoint "Maxwell, Robert L., 1957-" ;
bf:hasAuthority [ a madsrdf:Authority ;
madsrdf:authoritativeLabel "Maxwell, Robert L., 1957-" ] ;
bf:label "Maxwell, Robert L., 1957-" ] ;
bf:derivedFrom <http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419.marcxml.xml> ;
bf:hasAnnotation [ a bf:TableOfContents ;
bf:annotates <http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419> ;
bf:label "Table of contents only" ;
bf:tableOfContents <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0722/2007027845.html> ],
[ a bf:Annotation ;
bf:annotates <http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419> ;
bf:changeDate "2009-08-27T10:38" ;
bf:derivedFrom <http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419.marcxml.xml> ;
bf:descriptionConventions <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/descriptionConventions/aacr2> ;
bf:descriptionModifier <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/organizations/dlc> ;
bf:descriptionSource <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/organizations/dlc> ;
bf:generationProcess "DLC transform-tool:2015-01-16-T11:00:00" ] ;
bf:hasInstance [ a bf:Instance,
bf:Monograph ;
bf:contentsNote "The entity-relationship model -- The FRBR entities -- Relationships -- User tasks -- The FRBR model and the existing MARC and AACR2-based cataloging model." ;
bf:derivedFrom <http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419.marcxml.xml> ;
bf:dimensions "23 cm." ;
bf:format "paperback" ;
bf:heldItem [ a bf:HeldItem ;
bf:label "Z666.6 .M39 2008" ;
bf:shelfMarkLcc "Z666.6 .M39 2008" ] ;
bf:illustrationNote "ill. ;" ;
bf:instanceOf <http://id.loc.gov//resources/bibs/14920419> ;
bf:instanceTitle [ a bf:Title ;
bf:subtitle "a guide for the perplexed " ;
bf:titleValue "FRBR :" ] ;
bf:isbn10 <http://isbn.example.org/0838909507> ;
bf:isbn13 <http://isbn.example.org/9780838909508> ;
37. Make Your Own BIBFRAME Examples
1. BIBFRAME Compare:
http://bibframe.org/tools/compare/
2. Enter an LC system number (e.g. 10342843).
3. Click Run Comparison
4. Figure out what's going on.
5. Print out and colour in.
38. Things you could do next…
Learn more about linked data
Read the BIBFRAME list
Consider the implications
Add $0 to headings
Concentrate on headings
SPARQL (e.g BL and Oslo Public Library)
Look at BIBFRAME transformed examples
Look at Worldcat examples
Find other library linked data
Find non-library linked data
Play!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/34905030@N00/14532041398/
39. Find Out More
BIBFRAME.org
http://bibframe.org/
BIBFRAME Model and vocabulary.
http://bibframe.org/vocab/
BIBFRAME Model Primer (pdf).
http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-
2012.pdf
BIBFRAME mailing list.
http://listserv.loc.gov/listarch/bibframe.html
40. References
BIBFRAME
• BIBFRAME AV Modeling Study: Defining a Flexible Model for Description of Audiovisual Resources / Kara Van
Malssen, AVPreserve (May 2014). http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/bibframe-avmodelingstudy-may15-2014.pdf
• BIBFRAME diagram. http://bibframe.org/vocab/
• A Bibliographic Framework for the Digital Age (October 31, 2011). http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/news/framework-
103111.html
• NLM announcement from BIBFRAME mailing list (November 2014). http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-
bin/wa?A2=ind1411&L=bibframe&T=0&P=12997
• On the Record / Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control (January 2008).
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf
• Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. Executive Summary (June 2011).
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rda-execsummary-public-13june11.pdf
• FRBR as Cake / Karen Coyle (Coyle's InFormation, 2011) http://kcoyle.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/frbr-as-cake.html
• Open Annotations Model / W3C. http://www.w3.org/ns/oa
TEL, Oslo, Bibliograph
• The European Library. Research Libraries UK Linked Open Data.
http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/tel4/access/data/lod
• OCLC. BiblioGraph.net. http://www.Bbbliograph.net
• Oslo Public Library SPARQL endpoint. http://data.deichman.no/sparql
• RDF Linked Data Cataloguing at Oslo Public Library / Asgeir Rekkavik (July 2014).
http://digital.deichman.no/blog/2014/07/06/rdf-linked-data-cataloguing-at-oslo-public-library/
Editor's Notes
I'm going to look at the:
Background
The model
Some of the issues as we go along.
Some other ways of doing it!
Short for BIBliographic FRAMEwork initiative
Not an acronym!
Also,
Bibflow
LibHub
MarcNext
I alluded earlier to the problems with MARC and RDA in particular that LC and US testers identified…
"The library community's data carrier, MARC, is based on forty-year old techniques for data management and is out of step with programming styles of today. No community other than the library community uses this record format, severely compromising its utility to other communities as a data transmission tool. Bibliographic applications being developed outside of the library environment are not making use of, and may not be compatible with, records encoded in MARC. New and anticipated uses of bibliographic data require a format that will accommodate and distinguish expert-, automated-, and user-generated metadata, including annotations (reviews, comments) and usage data. Flexible design should allow for the selective (modular) use of metadata in different environments (e.g., use of controlled vocabularies appropriate to specific domains). The existing Z39.2/MARC “stack” is not an appropriate starting place for a new bibliographic data carrier because of the limitations placed upon it by the formats of the past."—On the Record. Jan. 2008
"Many survey respondents expressed doubt that RDA changes would yield significant benefits without a change to the underlying MARC carrier.
"Most felt any benefits of RDA would be largely unrealized in a MARC environment. MARC may hinder the separation of elements and ability to use URIs in a linked data environment.
"Demonstrate credible progress towards a replacement for MARC"
-- Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. Executive Summary –June 2011
"Bibliographic framework is intended to indicate an environment rather than a "format"" according to the A Bibliographic Framework for the Digital Age (October 2011). However, most people when they are talking about Bibframe are in fact talking about this idea, which is what I'm going to focus on.
Storage - Possibly
Manipulation - Yes
Display – No (beyond actual data). Not like AACR2/RDA and MARC do.
Input – MARC is basically an input screen in its own right. Bibframe editor could have been done years ago.
Exchange and distribution – Yes, on the web
Publication – Yes, on the web
"Lingua franca of library cataloguing" – Hopefully not!
MARC has a lot more purposes that it needs. This makes it hard for Bibframe if it tries to Replace MARC.
"foundation for the future of bibliographic description that happens on the web and in the networked world"
AMBITIOUS! Is it too ambitious?
Conversion of MARC or replacement of MARC? – See the implications of the previous slide. Many purposes.
For all libraries everywhere? For LC or for all academic libraries? For national libraries. Your local public library, school libraries?
For all bibliographic data? – For repositories, digital image libraries, commercial data, Library Thing, article databases, discovery system knowledge bases, etc, etc. For books, AV, serials, anything held by a library?? On what system: ILSs, as an additional nicety, something else entirely? Is this all wise?
BIBFRAME is fundamentally "an initiative of the Library of Congress".
Zepheira are consultants with expertise and experience with the Semantic Web. Worked with OCLC on schema.org as well as a new project with University of California, Davis to "investigate the future of research library operations, particularly the production of metadata — or data on data — and deployment on the Web." Its president, Eric Miller, has been prominent in the development of the Semantic Web and RDF.
Interestingly not a formal collaborative effort.
Zepheira are no longer formally involved although they have a number of related projects, including training. The emphasis in 2015 has been on keeping the format stable and encouraging libraries to test.
I understand that something akin to the MARC management structure is likely at some point.
This is the basic Bibframe model. Bits of it look like FRBR, but the Expression in particular is missing.
The Sir Humphrey version:
"BIBFRAME has worked on modelling works as Works within the BIBFRAME model, similar to the RDA modelling work, itself modelled on the work on the FRBR model of Works and Expressions. A BIBFRAME Work is a creative work, perhaps a FRBR Work, or an RDA FRBR Work but it also expresses a FRBR Expression, and of course an RDA FRBR Expression. A Work may express another Work based on others’ work, not just a FRBR Work or an RDA Work. That also works. FRBR Works or RDA Works expressed as BIBFRAME Works can relate to FRBR Expressions (BIBFRAME Works or RDA Expressions). So, Works are works that can be Works but also Expressions linked to Works that really are Works."
Also similar to schema.org Work/? Split
Schema.org has vaguely similar Work/Instance split.
Oslo PL has similar Work/Manifestation split.
The LC A/V Bibframe Modelling report suggested something different, creating an (unintentional/natural) Event category on the same level as Work and placing them both within something called Content. This report also has references to a lot of models that are not strictly FRBR or Bibframe or …
A Bibframe resource can be anything the same as as RDF resource is anything that can be given a URI.
authorizedAccessPoint: "Controlled string form of a resource label intended to help uniquely identify it, such as a unique title or a unique name plus title." For the resource, not one of its access points. [Literal]
identifier: Number or code that uniquely identifies an entity. [identifier]
label: "Text string expressing the property value." [Literal]
relatedTo: "Any relationship between resources." [URL]
classificationLcc: Other classifications are available.
contains: "Work that is a discrete component of a larger work."
creator: Creator role / Generalized creative responsibility role.
hasDerivative: "Work has a modification for which it is the source. Work that has been translated, i.e., the text expressed in a language different from that of the original workp)."
NB. expressionOf and hasExpression!
hasInstance: "Work has a related Instance/manifestation."!
bf:title: a string
WorkTitle: a Title object
contributor: Contributor role / Generalized expressive responsibility role.
dimensions: "Measurements of the carrier or carriers and/or the container of a resource."
Isbn, isbn10, isbn13: More specific than bf:identifier. Identifier is a specific type of resource. identifierAssigner Identifier assigner. Literal
identifierQualifier Identifier qualifier. Literal
identifierScheme Identifier scheme. URL
identifierStatus Identifier status. Literal
identifierValue Identifier value. Literal.
bf:publication: Seems to have replaced the previous attributes bf:placePub, bf:provider, bf:pubDate to provide a more event-based model (like the BL's). See example on next slide.
titleStatement: "Title transcribed from an instance."
For FRBR, note instanceOf. Also, at least in examples, the split between creator for work, and contributor for instances.
This is a brief example to give you an idea of the model as a whole, including Publication modelled as an event.
Example of Bibframe Authority.
Previous properties included resourceRole, isnni, orcid, and viaf. Resourcerole is tricky.
EXAMPLE ISSUE 1: AUTHORITIES
There was some debate on this issue, of how they should be handled.
The first is what most people would assume would happen and is the classic linked data approach. Indeed, it's basically a recreation of the first example I showed you this morning.
The second is Bibframe's attempt to deal with some essentially practical problems:
Local indexing
Local variation
Allows augmentation from other sources
Deals with people not in authority files without a pre-existing URI
Although many of these things are possible by simply making use of existing techniques. There is also the danger that the notion of an authority is confused with that of a person. They are not the same thing
Which of these is it? There is evidence to suggest that it could be several.
Person page says: "Individual or identity established by an individual (either alone or in collaboration with one or more other individuals)" but…
Authority says: "Representation of a key concept or thing. Works and Instances, for example, have defined relationships to these concepts and things."
There are also properties hinting at ambiguity or the traditional approach.
authorityAssigner Authority assigner / Entity that assigned the information. Agent
authoritySource Authority source / Authority list from which a value is taken. Literal
hasAuthority Authority information / Link to controlled form of name or subject and other information about.
When knowing WHO is asserting the additional information is important!!!
There is other work which approaches the same problems: named graphs, and an already established Open Annotations Model from the W3C whose outline Bibframe follows but not exactly. This could prove troublesome.
Mooted as a possible way of modelling Holdings and items, but not without criticism.
bf:describes is a subproperty of bf:annotates
bf:annotationAssertedBy: a URI of whoever asserted this was the case. The important bit for Annotations! In this case, UCL
This is an LC MARC record for FRBR: a guide for the perplexed by Robert L. Maxwell.
This is the same book but in Turtle. Difficult to fit on the screen!! I'll show you the whole thing, but split up and highlight a few things as we go along.
Note the LC URI for the Work at the top.
No link to an external authority here, presumably because it's generated on the fly as a conversion.
There are two Annotations here (look for the square brackets).
The first is a link to a table of contents.
The second appears to be information about the creation of the record.
Instance, so has all the physical description, instance title, etc.
Note the ambiguity of the bf:derivedFrom statement which implies that the the Instance is derived from the a MARC XML record.
Publication information is here.
One thing you may have noticed is that all the properties are BF specific…
EXAMPLE ISSUE 3: VOCABULARIES
I've coloured in each line of a Bibframe "record" and you can see that most of it is red, which is the BF vocab.
The orange is RDF
The blue is MADS
We heard about the BNB earlier and this is the same book…
The red here are the terms coined by the BL. All the others are external vocabularies.
I have highlighted the equivalents of the 100 and 245
This is The European Library. They recently converted a huge amount of RLUK data to linked data.
The red here is in fact the RDA element set!
The white is the EDM, and you can see it never made it beyond the prefixes.
The red here are the PL's own terms.
OPL are working on producing and using LD like this for their internal purposes as MARC not fit for their purposes and they felt they couldn't wait for Bibframe to be ready. Do read the article!
This and OCLC in particular point an intriguing way towards not waiting for a vendor to along with something ready for us to use.
Note here that
The Title Proper is from the DCT vocabulary
The Subtitle is from the Fabio vocabulary
The SOR is from the RDA vocabulary!
No information about the Creator here.