Photodetectors
Photodetectors 
Principle of the p-n junction Photodiode 
 Schematic diagram of a reverse 
biased p-n junction photodiode 
SiO2 
Electrode 
r net 
eNd x 
–eNa 
x 
E (x) 
R 
E max 
h+ e– 
Iph 
hv  > Eg 
W 
E 
n 
Depletion 
region 
AR 
coating 
Vr 
Vout 
Electrode 
 Net space charge across the diode 
in the depletion region. Nd and Na 
are the donor and acceptor 
concentrations in the p and n 
sides. 
 The field in the depletion region. 
p+ 
Photocurrent is depend on number 
of EHP and drift velocity. 
The electrode do not inject carriers 
but allow excess carriers in the 
sample to leave and become 
collected by the battery.
6 
Principle of pn junction photodiode 
• (a) Reversed biased p+n junction 
photodiode. 
• Annular electrode to allow photon 
to enter the device. 
• Antireflection coating (Si3N4) to 
reduce the reflection. 
• The p+-side thickness < 1 μm. 
• (b) Net space charge distribution, 
within SCL. 
• (c) The E field across depletion 
region.
Photodetectors 
Principle of the p-n junction Photodiode 
(b) Energy band diagram under reverse 
bias. 
(a) Cross-section view of a p-i-n photodiode. 
(c) Carrier absorption characteristics. 
 Operation of a p-i-n photodiode.
Photodetectors 
Principle of the p-n junction Photodiode 
 A generic photodiode.
Photodetectors 
Principle of the p-n junction Photodiode 
 Variation of photon flux with distance. 
A physical diagram showing the depletion 
region. 
 A plot of the the flux as a function of distance. 
 There is a loss due to Fresnel reflection at the surface, 
followed by the decaying exponential loss due to absorption. 
 The photon penetration depth x0 is defined as the depth at 
which the photon flux is reduced to e-1 of its surface value.
Photodetectors 
RAMO’s Theorem and External Photocurrent 
 An EHP is photogenerated at x = l. The electron and the hole drift in opposite directions with 
drift velocities vh and ve. 
 The electron arrives at time telectron = (L-l )/ve and the hole arrives at time thole = l/vh. 
0 
t 
t t 
V 
e- h+ 
Iphoto(t) 
Semiconductor 
x 
l L- l 
t 
vhole 
0 l L 
h+ e– 
0 
e h v 
e v e 
v 
h e ö çè 
Area = Charge = e 
evh/L eve /L 
ielectron(t) 
photocurrent 
E 
L 
÷ø 
æ L 
+ L 
thole 
telectron 
thole ihole(t) 
i (t) 
telectron 
thole 
velectron 
iphoto(t)
Photodetectors 
RAMO’s Theorem and External Photocurrent 
 As the electron and hole drift, each generates ielectron(t) and ihole(t). 
 The total photocurrent is the sum of hole and electron photocurrents each 
lasting a duration th and te respectively. 
t ( t ) L = - l and t ( t ) 
l v = v Transit time 
Work done = e × E dx = V × 
i ( t ) dt e i ( t ) e v = ; < ( ) e 
h 
e 
L t t 
e i t = e v ; < 
h 
L t t 
h E V e = = 
Q i ( t ) dt i ( t ) dt e e th 
h 
t 
collected e = ò + ò = 0 0 
If a charge q is being drifted with a velocity vd(t) by a field between two biased 
electrodes separated by L, the motion of q generates an external current 
given by 
( ) 
transit 
i (t) = e v t ; < 
d t t L 
h 
h 
e 
e 
v dx 
dt 
L 
Photocurrent 
The collected charge is not 
2e but just “one electron”. 
Ramo’s Theorem 

Photodetectors 
Absorption Coefficient and Photodiode Materials 
 Absorbed Photon create Electron-Hole Pair. 
[ ] 1.24 m E eV 
[ ] 
g 
g l m = 
Cut-off wavelength 
vs. Energy bandgap 
 Incident photons become absorbed as they travel in the 
semiconductor and light intensity decays exponentially 
with distance into the semiconductor. 
I x = I × e-a x 0 ( ) Absorption coefficient 

Absorption Coefficient 
5 4 3 2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 
13 
• Absorption 
coefficient α is a 
material property. 
• Most of the photon 
absorption (63%) 
occurs over a 
distance 1/α (it is 
called penetration 
depth δ) 
GaAs 
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 
Wavelength (mm) 
In0.53Ga0.47As 
Ge 
Si 
In0.7Ga0.3As0.64P0.36 
InP 
a-Si:H 
1´108 
1´107 
1´106 
a (m-1) 
1´105 
1´104 
1´103 
Photon energy (eV) 
Absorption coefficient ( a) vs. wavelength (l) for various semiconductors 
(Data selectively collected and combined from various sources.)
Photodetectors 
Absorption Coefficient and Photodiode Materials 
54 3 2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 
Ge 
GaAs 
1´108 
1´107 
1´106 
1´105 
1´104 
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 
Wavelength (mm) 
Si 
In0.7Ga0.3As0.64P0.36 
InP 
a-Si:H 
1´103 
Photon energy (eV) 
Absorption Coefficient a   (m-1) 
1.0 
In0.53Ga0.47As 
 Absorption 
The indirect-gap materials are shown with a broken line.
Absorption Coefficient 
• Direct bandgap semiconductors 
(GaAs, InAs, InP, GaSb, InGaAs, 
GaAsSb), the photon absorption does 
not require assistant from lattice 
vibrations. The photon is absorbed 
and the electron is excited directly 
from the VB to CB without a change 
in its k-vector (crystal momentum 
ħk), since photon momentum is very 
small. 
15 
E 
CB 
Ec 
Ev 
Direct Bandgap Eg Photon 
VB 
–k k 
(a) GaAs (Direct bandgap) 
(a) Photon absorption in a direct bandgap in an indirect bandgap semiconductor © 1999 S.O. Kasap, Optoelectronics (Prentice photon momentum 0 CB VB k - k = » 
 Absorption coefficient α for direct bandgap semiconductors 
rise sharply with decreasing wavelength from λg (GaAs and 
InP).
Absorption Coefficient 
• Indirect bandgap 
semiconductors (Si and Ge), the 
photon absorption requires 
assistant from lattice vibrations 
(phonon). If K is wave vector 
of lattice wave, then ħK 
represents the momentum 
associated with lattice vibration 
 ħK is a phonon momentum. 
k - k = phonon momentum = K CB VB 
16 
E 
CB 
Ec 
Ev 
Direct Bandgap Eg Photon 
VB 
–k k 
(a) GaAs (Direct bandgap) 
E 
VB 
CB 
Indirect Bandgap, Eg 
Ec 
Ev 
Photon 
Phonon 
–k k 
(b) Si (Indirect bandgap) 
(a) Photon absorption in a direct bandgap semiconductor. (b) Photon absorption 
in an indirect bandgap semiconductor (VB, valence band; CB, conduction band) 
© 1999 S.O. Kasap, Optoelectronics (Prentice Hall) 
 Thus the probability of photon absorption is not as high as in a 
direct transition and the λg is not as sharp as for direct bandgap 
semiconductors.
Photodetectors 
Absorption Coefficient and Photodiode Materials 
Photon absorption in 
a direct bandgap semiconductor. 
E 
CB 
VB 
Direct Bandgap Eg 
–k k 
Photon absorption in 
an indirect bandgap semiconductor 
E 
VB 
CB 
Indirect Bandgap 
Photon 
EE g C 
EV 
Phonons 
–k k 
EC 
EV 
Photon
Photodetectors 
Quantum Efficiency and Responsivity 
I e 
 External Quantum Efficiency 
Number of EHP geberated and collected ph 
h P h 
n 
Number of incidnet photons 
0 
= = 
I 
R = Photocurrent = ph 
0 (W) 
(A) 
P 
Incident Optical Power 
 Responsivity 
R e e 
h l 
=h = Spectral Responsivity 
h c 
h 
n 

 Responsivity vs. wavelength for a typical Si photodiode. 
Si Photodiode 
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 
1 
0.9 
0.8 
0.7 
0.6 
0.5 
0.4 
0.3 
0.2 
0.1 
0 
Wavelength (nm) 
l g 
Responsivity (A/W) 
Ideal Photodiode 
QE = 100% ( h = 1) 
Photodetectors
The pin Photodiode 
• The pn junction photodiode has two 
drawbacks: 
– Depletion layer capacitance is not 
sufficiently small to allow 
photodetection at high modulation 
frequencies (RC time constant 
limitation). 
– Narrow SCL (at most a few microns)  
long wavelengths incident photons are 
absorbed outside SCL  low QE 
• The pin photodiode can significantly 
reduce these problems. 
 Intrinsic layer has less doping and wider region (5 – 50 μm). 
20
Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode 
 Reverse-biased p-i-n photodiode 
 pin energy-band diagram 
 pin photodiode circuit
 Schematic diagram of pin photodiode 
SiO2 
p+ 
i-Si n+ 
Electrode 
r net 
eNd 
–eNa 
x 
x 
E(x) 
In contrast to pn junction 
built-in-field is uniform 
R 
E0 
e– h+ 
Iph 
hu > Eg 
W 
Vr 
Vout 
Electrode 
E 
Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode 
 Small depletion layer capacitance gives high modulation frequencies. 
 High Quantum efficiency.
 A reverse biased pin photodiode is illuminated with a short wavelength 
photon that is absorbed very near the surface. 
 The photogenerated electron has to diffuse to the depletion region 
where it is swept into the i- layer and drifted across. 
hu > Eg 
p+ i-Si 
Diffusion 
e– 
h+ 
E 
Drift 
 W 
Vr 
Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode
p-i-n diode 
(a) The structure; 
(b) equilibrium energy band diagram; 
(c) energy band diagram under reverse bias. 
Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode
Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode 
 The responsivity of pin photodiodes
Photodetectors 
Photoconductive Detectors and Photoconductive gain 
 Quantum efficiency versus wavelength for various photodetectors.
Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode 
 Junction capacitance of pin 
C = e e A 
0 
r dep 
W 
 Electric field of biased pin 
 Small capacitance: High modulation frequency 
 RCdep time constant is ~ 50 psec. 
W V 
W V 
E = E + r » r 0 
 Response time 
t Wv = 
d 
drift 
E d d v = m 
 The speed of pin photodiodes are invariably limited by the transit time of 
photogenerated carriers across the i-Si layer. 
 For i-Si layer of width 10 mm, the drift time is about is about 0.1 nsec. 

Photodetectors 
The pin Photodiode 
 Drift velocity vs. electric field for holes and electrons in Silicon. 
105 
104 
103 
102 
Electron 
Hole 
104 105 106 107 
Electric field (V m-1) 
Drift velocity (m sec-1)
Example 
Bandgap and photodetection 
(a) Determine the maximum value of the energy gap which a semiconductor, used as a 
photoconductor, can have if it is to be sensitive to yellow light (600 nm). 
(b) A photodetector whose area is 5´10-2 cm2 is irradiated with yellow light whose 
intensity is 20 mW cm-2. Assuming that each photon generates one electron-hole 
pair, calculate the number of pairs generated per second. 
Solution 
(a) Given, l = 600 nm, we need Eph = hu = Eg so that, 
Eg = hc/l = (6.626´10-34 J s)(3´108 m s-1)/(600´10-9 m) = 2.07 eV 
(b) Area = 5´10-2 cm2 and Ilight = 20´10-3 W/cm2. 
The received power is 
P = Area ´Ilight = (5´10-2 cm2)(20´10-3 W/cm2) = 10-3 W 
Nph = number of photons arriving per second = P/Eph 
= (10-3 W)/(2.059´1.60218´10-19 J/eV) 
= 2.9787´1015 photons s-1 = 2.9787´1015 EHP s-1.
Example 
Bandgap and Photodetection 
(c) From the known energy gap of the semiconductor GaAs (Eg = 1.42 eV), calculate the 
primary wavelength of photons emitted from this crystal as a result of electron-hole 
recombination. Is this wavelength in the visible? 
(d) Will a silicon photodetector be sensitive to the radiation from a GaAs laser? Why? 
Solution 
(c) For GaAs, Eg = 1.42 eV and the corresponding wavelength is 
l = hc/ Eg = (6.626´10-34 J s)(3´108 m s-1)/(1.42 eV´1.6´10-19 J/eV) 
= 873 nm (invisible IR) 
The wavelength of emitted radiation due to EHP recombination is 873 nm. 
(d) For Si, Eg = 1.1 eV and the corresponding cut-off wavelength is, 
lg = hc/ Eg = (6.626´10-34 J s)(3´108 m s-1)/(1.1 eV´1.6´10-19 J/eV) 
= 1120 nm 
Since the 873 nm wavelength is shorter than the cut-off wavelength of 1120 nm, the 
Si photodetector can detect the 873 nm radiation (Put differently, the photon energy 
corresponding to 873 nm, 1.42 eV, is larger than the Eg, 1.1 eV, of Si which mean 
that the Si photodetector can indeed detect the 873 nm radiation)
Example 
Absorption coefficient 
(a)If d is the thickness of a photodetector material, Io is the intensity of the incoming 
radiation, the number of photons absorbed per unit volume of sample is 
[ ] 
n I d ph 
= 1 - exp( - a 
× 
) 0 d h 
u 
Solution 
(a) If I0 is the intensity of incoming radiation (energy flowing per unit area per 
second), I0 exp(-a d ) is the transmitted intensity through the specimen with 
thickness d and thus I0 exp(-a d ) is the “absorbed” intensity
Example 
(b) What is the thickness of a Ge and In0.53Ga0.47As crystal layer that is needed for 
absorbing 90% of the incident radiation at 1.5 mm? 
For Ge, a » 5.2 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. 
For In0.53Ga0.47As, a » 7.5 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. 
For Ge, a » 5.2 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. 
d 
ln 1 
1 
1 exp( ) 0.9 
 - - × = 
1 ln 1 
çè 
æ 
ö d m m 
m 
a 
a 
4.428 10 4.428 
1 0.9 
5.2 10 
1 0.9 
6 
5 = ´ = ÷ø 
´ - 
æ 
ö = ÷ø- 
çè 
= 
- 
For In0.53Ga0.47As, a » 7.5 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. 
1 6 
ln 1 
çè 
æ 
ö = - 
d 3.07 10 m 3.07mm 
1 0.9 
7.5 10 
5 = ´ = ÷ø 
´ - 
(b)
Example 
InGaAs pin Photodiodes 
Consider a commercial InGaAs pin photodiode whose responsivity is shown in fig. 
Responsivity (A/W) 
1 
0.8 
0.6 
0.4 
0.2 
0 
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 
Wavelength (nm) 
 The responsivity of an InGaAs 
pin photodiode 
Its dark current is 5 nA. 
(a) What optical power at a wavelength of 1.55 mm would give a photocurrent 
that is twice the dark current? What is the QE of the photodetector at 1.55 
mm? 
(b) What would be the photocurrent if the incident power in a was at 1.3 mm? 
What is the QE at 1.3 mm operation?
Solution 
(a) At l = 1.55´10-6 m, from the responsivity vs. wavelength curve we 
have R » 0.87 A/W. From the definition of responsivity, 
we have 
I 
R = Photocurrent A = ph 
P 
Incident Optical Power W 
( ) 0 
( ) 
nW 
2 2 5 10 - 
9 ( ) 
0 = = = ´ ´ = 
P ph dark 11.5 
A W 
A 
I 
R 
I 
R 
0.87 / ) 
From the definitions of quantum efficiency h and responsivity, 
	 	 
R e e 
h l 
hc 
=h = 
h 
u 
0.70 (70%) 
34 8 
- 
J m s A W 
(6.62 10 sec)(3 10 / )(0.87 / ) 
hcR 
l 
= = ´ × ´ - - 
19 6 
coul m 
(1.6 10 )(1.55 10 ) 
= 
´ ´ 
e 
h 
Note the following dimensional identities: A = C s-1 and W = J s-1 so that A W-1 = C J-1. 
Thus, responsivity in terms of photocurrent per unit incident optical power is also charge 
collected per unit incident energy.
Solution 
(b) At l = 1.3´10-6 m, from the responsivity vs. wavelength curve, R = 0.82 A/W. 
Since Po is the same and 11.5 nW as in (a), 	 	 
The QE at l = 1.3 mm is 
0.78 (78%) 
34 8 
J m s A W 
(6.62 10 sec)(3 10 / )(0.82 / ) 
hcR 
l 
= = ´ × ´ - - 
19 6 
(1.6 10 )(1.3 10 ) 
» 
´ ´ 
- 
coul m 
e 
h 
I R P A W nW nA ph (0.82 / )(1.15 ) 9.43 0 = × = =
Photodetectors 
Avalanche Photodiode (APD) 
p p+ 
Electrode SiO2 
rnet 
x 
x 
E(x) 
R 
hu > Eg 
p 
Iphoto 
e – h+ 
Absorptio 
n 
Avalanche regrieognion 
Electrode 
n+ 
E 
 Impact ionization processes 
resulting avalanche multiplication 
h+ 
e– 
E 
n+ p p 
Avalanche region 
e-h+ 
Ec 
Ev 
 Impact of an energetic electron's kinetic energy 
excites VB electron to the CV.
SiO2 
Guard ring 
Electrode 
Antireflection coating 
n n n + 
p 
p 
p+ 
Substrate 
Electrode 
n+ 
p 
p 
p+ 
Substrate 
Electrode 
Avalanche breakdown 
Si APD structure without a 
guard ring 
More practical Si APD 
Photodetectors 
Avalanche Photodiode (APD) 
 Schematic diagram of typical Si APD. 
 Breakdown voltage around periphery is higher and avalanche is 
confined more to illuminated region (n+p junction).
Photodetectors 
Heterojunction Photodiode 
Separate Absorption and Multiplication (SAM) APD 
InGaAs-InP heterostructure Separate Absorption and Multiplication APD 
E 
Vr 
N n 
Electrode 
x 
E(x) 
R 
hu 
I 
ph 
Absorption 
region 
Avalanche 
region 
InP InGaAs 
h+ 
e– 
InP 
P + n+ 
Vout 
E 
P and N refer to p- and 
n-type wider-bandgap 
semiconductor.
Photodetectors 
Heterojunction Photodiode 
Separate Absorption and Multiplication (SAM) APD 
InP 
InGaAs 
e– 
h+ 
Ec 
Ev 
Ec 
Ev 
InP 
InGaAs 
Ev 
Ev 
h+ 
DEv 
E 
InGaAsP grading layer 
(a) Energy band diagram for a SAM 
heterojunction APD where there is 
a valence band step DEv from 
InGaAs to InP that slows hole 
entry into the InP layer. 
(b) An interposing grading layer 
(InGaAsP) with an intermediate 
bandgap breaks DEv and makes it 
easier for the hole to pass to the InP 
layer.
x 
Photogenerated electron concentration 
exp( -a x) at time t = 0 
R 
v 
de 
A B 
e– 
h+ 
i 
ph 
hu  > E 
g 
W 
V 
r 
E

Chap6 photodetectors

  • 1.
  • 5.
    Photodetectors Principle ofthe p-n junction Photodiode  Schematic diagram of a reverse biased p-n junction photodiode SiO2 Electrode r net eNd x –eNa x E (x) R E max h+ e– Iph hv > Eg W E n Depletion region AR coating Vr Vout Electrode  Net space charge across the diode in the depletion region. Nd and Na are the donor and acceptor concentrations in the p and n sides.  The field in the depletion region. p+ Photocurrent is depend on number of EHP and drift velocity. The electrode do not inject carriers but allow excess carriers in the sample to leave and become collected by the battery.
  • 6.
    6 Principle ofpn junction photodiode • (a) Reversed biased p+n junction photodiode. • Annular electrode to allow photon to enter the device. • Antireflection coating (Si3N4) to reduce the reflection. • The p+-side thickness < 1 μm. • (b) Net space charge distribution, within SCL. • (c) The E field across depletion region.
  • 7.
    Photodetectors Principle ofthe p-n junction Photodiode (b) Energy band diagram under reverse bias. (a) Cross-section view of a p-i-n photodiode. (c) Carrier absorption characteristics.  Operation of a p-i-n photodiode.
  • 8.
    Photodetectors Principle ofthe p-n junction Photodiode  A generic photodiode.
  • 9.
    Photodetectors Principle ofthe p-n junction Photodiode  Variation of photon flux with distance. A physical diagram showing the depletion region.  A plot of the the flux as a function of distance.  There is a loss due to Fresnel reflection at the surface, followed by the decaying exponential loss due to absorption.  The photon penetration depth x0 is defined as the depth at which the photon flux is reduced to e-1 of its surface value.
  • 10.
    Photodetectors RAMO’s Theoremand External Photocurrent  An EHP is photogenerated at x = l. The electron and the hole drift in opposite directions with drift velocities vh and ve.  The electron arrives at time telectron = (L-l )/ve and the hole arrives at time thole = l/vh. 0 t t t V e- h+ Iphoto(t) Semiconductor x l L- l t vhole 0 l L h+ e– 0 e h v e v e v h e ö çè Area = Charge = e evh/L eve /L ielectron(t) photocurrent E L ÷ø æ L + L thole telectron thole ihole(t) i (t) telectron thole velectron iphoto(t)
  • 11.
    Photodetectors RAMO’s Theoremand External Photocurrent  As the electron and hole drift, each generates ielectron(t) and ihole(t).  The total photocurrent is the sum of hole and electron photocurrents each lasting a duration th and te respectively. t ( t ) L = - l and t ( t ) l v = v Transit time Work done = e × E dx = V × i ( t ) dt e i ( t ) e v = ; < ( ) e h e L t t e i t = e v ; < h L t t h E V e = = Q i ( t ) dt i ( t ) dt e e th h t collected e = ò + ò = 0 0 If a charge q is being drifted with a velocity vd(t) by a field between two biased electrodes separated by L, the motion of q generates an external current given by ( ) transit i (t) = e v t ; < d t t L h h e e v dx dt L Photocurrent The collected charge is not 2e but just “one electron”. Ramo’s Theorem 
  • 12.
    Photodetectors Absorption Coefficientand Photodiode Materials  Absorbed Photon create Electron-Hole Pair. [ ] 1.24 m E eV [ ] g g l m = Cut-off wavelength vs. Energy bandgap  Incident photons become absorbed as they travel in the semiconductor and light intensity decays exponentially with distance into the semiconductor. I x = I × e-a x 0 ( ) Absorption coefficient 
  • 13.
    Absorption Coefficient 54 3 2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 13 • Absorption coefficient α is a material property. • Most of the photon absorption (63%) occurs over a distance 1/α (it is called penetration depth δ) GaAs 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Wavelength (mm) In0.53Ga0.47As Ge Si In0.7Ga0.3As0.64P0.36 InP a-Si:H 1´108 1´107 1´106 a (m-1) 1´105 1´104 1´103 Photon energy (eV) Absorption coefficient ( a) vs. wavelength (l) for various semiconductors (Data selectively collected and combined from various sources.)
  • 14.
    Photodetectors Absorption Coefficientand Photodiode Materials 54 3 2 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Ge GaAs 1´108 1´107 1´106 1´105 1´104 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Wavelength (mm) Si In0.7Ga0.3As0.64P0.36 InP a-Si:H 1´103 Photon energy (eV) Absorption Coefficient a (m-1) 1.0 In0.53Ga0.47As  Absorption The indirect-gap materials are shown with a broken line.
  • 15.
    Absorption Coefficient •Direct bandgap semiconductors (GaAs, InAs, InP, GaSb, InGaAs, GaAsSb), the photon absorption does not require assistant from lattice vibrations. The photon is absorbed and the electron is excited directly from the VB to CB without a change in its k-vector (crystal momentum ħk), since photon momentum is very small. 15 E CB Ec Ev Direct Bandgap Eg Photon VB –k k (a) GaAs (Direct bandgap) (a) Photon absorption in a direct bandgap in an indirect bandgap semiconductor © 1999 S.O. Kasap, Optoelectronics (Prentice photon momentum 0 CB VB k - k = »  Absorption coefficient α for direct bandgap semiconductors rise sharply with decreasing wavelength from λg (GaAs and InP).
  • 16.
    Absorption Coefficient •Indirect bandgap semiconductors (Si and Ge), the photon absorption requires assistant from lattice vibrations (phonon). If K is wave vector of lattice wave, then ħK represents the momentum associated with lattice vibration  ħK is a phonon momentum. k - k = phonon momentum = K CB VB 16 E CB Ec Ev Direct Bandgap Eg Photon VB –k k (a) GaAs (Direct bandgap) E VB CB Indirect Bandgap, Eg Ec Ev Photon Phonon –k k (b) Si (Indirect bandgap) (a) Photon absorption in a direct bandgap semiconductor. (b) Photon absorption in an indirect bandgap semiconductor (VB, valence band; CB, conduction band) © 1999 S.O. Kasap, Optoelectronics (Prentice Hall)  Thus the probability of photon absorption is not as high as in a direct transition and the λg is not as sharp as for direct bandgap semiconductors.
  • 17.
    Photodetectors Absorption Coefficientand Photodiode Materials Photon absorption in a direct bandgap semiconductor. E CB VB Direct Bandgap Eg –k k Photon absorption in an indirect bandgap semiconductor E VB CB Indirect Bandgap Photon EE g C EV Phonons –k k EC EV Photon
  • 18.
    Photodetectors Quantum Efficiencyand Responsivity I e  External Quantum Efficiency Number of EHP geberated and collected ph h P h n Number of incidnet photons 0 = = I R = Photocurrent = ph 0 (W) (A) P Incident Optical Power  Responsivity R e e h l =h = Spectral Responsivity h c h n 
  • 19.
     Responsivity vs.wavelength for a typical Si photodiode. Si Photodiode 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Wavelength (nm) l g Responsivity (A/W) Ideal Photodiode QE = 100% ( h = 1) Photodetectors
  • 20.
    The pin Photodiode • The pn junction photodiode has two drawbacks: – Depletion layer capacitance is not sufficiently small to allow photodetection at high modulation frequencies (RC time constant limitation). – Narrow SCL (at most a few microns)  long wavelengths incident photons are absorbed outside SCL  low QE • The pin photodiode can significantly reduce these problems.  Intrinsic layer has less doping and wider region (5 – 50 μm). 20
  • 21.
    Photodetectors The pinPhotodiode  Reverse-biased p-i-n photodiode  pin energy-band diagram  pin photodiode circuit
  • 22.
     Schematic diagramof pin photodiode SiO2 p+ i-Si n+ Electrode r net eNd –eNa x x E(x) In contrast to pn junction built-in-field is uniform R E0 e– h+ Iph hu > Eg W Vr Vout Electrode E Photodetectors The pin Photodiode  Small depletion layer capacitance gives high modulation frequencies.  High Quantum efficiency.
  • 23.
     A reversebiased pin photodiode is illuminated with a short wavelength photon that is absorbed very near the surface.  The photogenerated electron has to diffuse to the depletion region where it is swept into the i- layer and drifted across. hu > Eg p+ i-Si Diffusion e– h+ E Drift  W Vr Photodetectors The pin Photodiode
  • 24.
    p-i-n diode (a)The structure; (b) equilibrium energy band diagram; (c) energy band diagram under reverse bias. Photodetectors The pin Photodiode
  • 25.
    Photodetectors The pinPhotodiode  The responsivity of pin photodiodes
  • 26.
    Photodetectors Photoconductive Detectorsand Photoconductive gain  Quantum efficiency versus wavelength for various photodetectors.
  • 27.
    Photodetectors The pinPhotodiode  Junction capacitance of pin C = e e A 0 r dep W  Electric field of biased pin  Small capacitance: High modulation frequency  RCdep time constant is ~ 50 psec. W V W V E = E + r » r 0  Response time t Wv = d drift E d d v = m  The speed of pin photodiodes are invariably limited by the transit time of photogenerated carriers across the i-Si layer.  For i-Si layer of width 10 mm, the drift time is about is about 0.1 nsec. 
  • 28.
    Photodetectors The pinPhotodiode  Drift velocity vs. electric field for holes and electrons in Silicon. 105 104 103 102 Electron Hole 104 105 106 107 Electric field (V m-1) Drift velocity (m sec-1)
  • 32.
    Example Bandgap andphotodetection (a) Determine the maximum value of the energy gap which a semiconductor, used as a photoconductor, can have if it is to be sensitive to yellow light (600 nm). (b) A photodetector whose area is 5´10-2 cm2 is irradiated with yellow light whose intensity is 20 mW cm-2. Assuming that each photon generates one electron-hole pair, calculate the number of pairs generated per second. Solution (a) Given, l = 600 nm, we need Eph = hu = Eg so that, Eg = hc/l = (6.626´10-34 J s)(3´108 m s-1)/(600´10-9 m) = 2.07 eV (b) Area = 5´10-2 cm2 and Ilight = 20´10-3 W/cm2. The received power is P = Area ´Ilight = (5´10-2 cm2)(20´10-3 W/cm2) = 10-3 W Nph = number of photons arriving per second = P/Eph = (10-3 W)/(2.059´1.60218´10-19 J/eV) = 2.9787´1015 photons s-1 = 2.9787´1015 EHP s-1.
  • 33.
    Example Bandgap andPhotodetection (c) From the known energy gap of the semiconductor GaAs (Eg = 1.42 eV), calculate the primary wavelength of photons emitted from this crystal as a result of electron-hole recombination. Is this wavelength in the visible? (d) Will a silicon photodetector be sensitive to the radiation from a GaAs laser? Why? Solution (c) For GaAs, Eg = 1.42 eV and the corresponding wavelength is l = hc/ Eg = (6.626´10-34 J s)(3´108 m s-1)/(1.42 eV´1.6´10-19 J/eV) = 873 nm (invisible IR) The wavelength of emitted radiation due to EHP recombination is 873 nm. (d) For Si, Eg = 1.1 eV and the corresponding cut-off wavelength is, lg = hc/ Eg = (6.626´10-34 J s)(3´108 m s-1)/(1.1 eV´1.6´10-19 J/eV) = 1120 nm Since the 873 nm wavelength is shorter than the cut-off wavelength of 1120 nm, the Si photodetector can detect the 873 nm radiation (Put differently, the photon energy corresponding to 873 nm, 1.42 eV, is larger than the Eg, 1.1 eV, of Si which mean that the Si photodetector can indeed detect the 873 nm radiation)
  • 34.
    Example Absorption coefficient (a)If d is the thickness of a photodetector material, Io is the intensity of the incoming radiation, the number of photons absorbed per unit volume of sample is [ ] n I d ph = 1 - exp( - a × ) 0 d h u Solution (a) If I0 is the intensity of incoming radiation (energy flowing per unit area per second), I0 exp(-a d ) is the transmitted intensity through the specimen with thickness d and thus I0 exp(-a d ) is the “absorbed” intensity
  • 35.
    Example (b) Whatis the thickness of a Ge and In0.53Ga0.47As crystal layer that is needed for absorbing 90% of the incident radiation at 1.5 mm? For Ge, a » 5.2 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. For In0.53Ga0.47As, a » 7.5 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. For Ge, a » 5.2 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. d ln 1 1 1 exp( ) 0.9 - - × = 1 ln 1 çè æ ö d m m m a a 4.428 10 4.428 1 0.9 5.2 10 1 0.9 6 5 = ´ = ÷ø ´ - æ ö = ÷ø- çè = - For In0.53Ga0.47As, a » 7.5 ´ 105 m-1 at 1.5 mm incident radiation. 1 6 ln 1 çè æ ö = - d 3.07 10 m 3.07mm 1 0.9 7.5 10 5 = ´ = ÷ø ´ - (b)
  • 36.
    Example InGaAs pinPhotodiodes Consider a commercial InGaAs pin photodiode whose responsivity is shown in fig. Responsivity (A/W) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Wavelength (nm)  The responsivity of an InGaAs pin photodiode Its dark current is 5 nA. (a) What optical power at a wavelength of 1.55 mm would give a photocurrent that is twice the dark current? What is the QE of the photodetector at 1.55 mm? (b) What would be the photocurrent if the incident power in a was at 1.3 mm? What is the QE at 1.3 mm operation?
  • 37.
    Solution (a) Atl = 1.55´10-6 m, from the responsivity vs. wavelength curve we have R » 0.87 A/W. From the definition of responsivity, we have I R = Photocurrent A = ph P Incident Optical Power W ( ) 0 ( ) nW 2 2 5 10 - 9 ( ) 0 = = = ´ ´ = P ph dark 11.5 A W A I R I R 0.87 / ) From the definitions of quantum efficiency h and responsivity, R e e h l hc =h = h u 0.70 (70%) 34 8 - J m s A W (6.62 10 sec)(3 10 / )(0.87 / ) hcR l = = ´ × ´ - - 19 6 coul m (1.6 10 )(1.55 10 ) = ´ ´ e h Note the following dimensional identities: A = C s-1 and W = J s-1 so that A W-1 = C J-1. Thus, responsivity in terms of photocurrent per unit incident optical power is also charge collected per unit incident energy.
  • 38.
    Solution (b) Atl = 1.3´10-6 m, from the responsivity vs. wavelength curve, R = 0.82 A/W. Since Po is the same and 11.5 nW as in (a), The QE at l = 1.3 mm is 0.78 (78%) 34 8 J m s A W (6.62 10 sec)(3 10 / )(0.82 / ) hcR l = = ´ × ´ - - 19 6 (1.6 10 )(1.3 10 ) » ´ ´ - coul m e h I R P A W nW nA ph (0.82 / )(1.15 ) 9.43 0 = × = =
  • 39.
    Photodetectors Avalanche Photodiode(APD) p p+ Electrode SiO2 rnet x x E(x) R hu > Eg p Iphoto e – h+ Absorptio n Avalanche regrieognion Electrode n+ E  Impact ionization processes resulting avalanche multiplication h+ e– E n+ p p Avalanche region e-h+ Ec Ev  Impact of an energetic electron's kinetic energy excites VB electron to the CV.
  • 40.
    SiO2 Guard ring Electrode Antireflection coating n n n + p p p+ Substrate Electrode n+ p p p+ Substrate Electrode Avalanche breakdown Si APD structure without a guard ring More practical Si APD Photodetectors Avalanche Photodiode (APD)  Schematic diagram of typical Si APD.  Breakdown voltage around periphery is higher and avalanche is confined more to illuminated region (n+p junction).
  • 41.
    Photodetectors Heterojunction Photodiode Separate Absorption and Multiplication (SAM) APD InGaAs-InP heterostructure Separate Absorption and Multiplication APD E Vr N n Electrode x E(x) R hu I ph Absorption region Avalanche region InP InGaAs h+ e– InP P + n+ Vout E P and N refer to p- and n-type wider-bandgap semiconductor.
  • 42.
    Photodetectors Heterojunction Photodiode Separate Absorption and Multiplication (SAM) APD InP InGaAs e– h+ Ec Ev Ec Ev InP InGaAs Ev Ev h+ DEv E InGaAsP grading layer (a) Energy band diagram for a SAM heterojunction APD where there is a valence band step DEv from InGaAs to InP that slows hole entry into the InP layer. (b) An interposing grading layer (InGaAsP) with an intermediate bandgap breaks DEv and makes it easier for the hole to pass to the InP layer.
  • 43.
    x Photogenerated electronconcentration exp( -a x) at time t = 0 R v de A B e– h+ i ph hu > E g W V r E