Nine Key Principles of Community-Based Participatory Research
Based on:
Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E and Becker A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, pp. 173-202
Nine Key Principles of Community-Based Participatory Research
Based on:
Israel B, Schulz A, Parker E and Becker A. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, pp. 173-202
Seven Steps to EnGendering Evaluations of Public Health ProgramsMEASURE Evaluation
Because international development increasingly focuses on gender, evaluators need a better understanding of how to measure and incorporate gender—including its economic, social, and health dimensions—in their evaluations. This interactive training, consisting of this presentation and a tool, will help participants learn to better evaluate programs with gender components. Access the tool at https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/tl-19-40
Assessing Research in Communities of ColorUCLA CTSI
This study will develop a toolkit to assist investigators with employing and utilizing the skills of community health workers, or promotoras, to encourage participation of underserved ethnic and minority populations in research.
Results from student-facilitated roundtable discussions at PACE Great Streets townhall meeting in Memphis, TN. This project represents an experiential learning activity at The University of Memphis, Health Promotion concentration in the Department of Health and Sport Sciences.
Tracking Student Access to High-Impact Practices in STEMJulia Michaels
We know that certain “High-Impact Practices,” such as internships, undergraduate research, capstone courses, and learning communities, help undergraduate students persist and succeed. These practices have a disproportionately positive impact on students from underrepresented backgrounds. This webinar will briefly summarize the evidence for High-Impact Practices (HIPs) and share innovative efforts from California State University, Northridge and the University of South Carolina to track and analyze underrepresented student participation and outcomes.
June 27/2017 - SPOR-PIHCI Network presentations from the pre-CAHSPR conference day in Toronto, Ontario
Sharing Practical Advances in Research Knowledge-
Translating Findings to Action from PIHCIN Research
Strengthen Dissemination, Implementation and Improvement ScienceUCLA CTSI
DII Science at UCLA: Launching a New Initiative (October 25, 2013)
Presented by: Brian Mittman, Moira Inkelas, Stefanie Vassar, Ibrahima Sankare, Arturo Martinez, Arleen Brown
The UCLA CTSI Dissemination, Implementation and Improvement (DII) Science Initiative has three main goals.
1) Expand UCLA’s competitiveness for DII funding and publication opportunities
2) Position UCLA CTSI for future renewal
3) Enhance societal impact and benefits of UCLA research and improve health care quality, health behaviors and health outcomes in Los Angeles County and beyond
The DII vision is to ensure that:
- Results of clinical studies are put into practice in Southern California to benefit diverse populations
- Local providers take part in studies of how to implement, spread and scale findings and innovations
- Research, implementation and dissemination occur seamlessly by design
- Delivery systems can work with researchers to develop system solutions
- Researchers can find delivery systems and/or provider networks with which to partner on implementation-oriented funding proposals and studies
Seven Steps to EnGendering Evaluations of Public Health ProgramsMEASURE Evaluation
Because international development increasingly focuses on gender, evaluators need a better understanding of how to measure and incorporate gender—including its economic, social, and health dimensions—in their evaluations. This interactive training, consisting of this presentation and a tool, will help participants learn to better evaluate programs with gender components. Access the tool at https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/tl-19-40
Assessing Research in Communities of ColorUCLA CTSI
This study will develop a toolkit to assist investigators with employing and utilizing the skills of community health workers, or promotoras, to encourage participation of underserved ethnic and minority populations in research.
Results from student-facilitated roundtable discussions at PACE Great Streets townhall meeting in Memphis, TN. This project represents an experiential learning activity at The University of Memphis, Health Promotion concentration in the Department of Health and Sport Sciences.
Tracking Student Access to High-Impact Practices in STEMJulia Michaels
We know that certain “High-Impact Practices,” such as internships, undergraduate research, capstone courses, and learning communities, help undergraduate students persist and succeed. These practices have a disproportionately positive impact on students from underrepresented backgrounds. This webinar will briefly summarize the evidence for High-Impact Practices (HIPs) and share innovative efforts from California State University, Northridge and the University of South Carolina to track and analyze underrepresented student participation and outcomes.
June 27/2017 - SPOR-PIHCI Network presentations from the pre-CAHSPR conference day in Toronto, Ontario
Sharing Practical Advances in Research Knowledge-
Translating Findings to Action from PIHCIN Research
Strengthen Dissemination, Implementation and Improvement ScienceUCLA CTSI
DII Science at UCLA: Launching a New Initiative (October 25, 2013)
Presented by: Brian Mittman, Moira Inkelas, Stefanie Vassar, Ibrahima Sankare, Arturo Martinez, Arleen Brown
The UCLA CTSI Dissemination, Implementation and Improvement (DII) Science Initiative has three main goals.
1) Expand UCLA’s competitiveness for DII funding and publication opportunities
2) Position UCLA CTSI for future renewal
3) Enhance societal impact and benefits of UCLA research and improve health care quality, health behaviors and health outcomes in Los Angeles County and beyond
The DII vision is to ensure that:
- Results of clinical studies are put into practice in Southern California to benefit diverse populations
- Local providers take part in studies of how to implement, spread and scale findings and innovations
- Research, implementation and dissemination occur seamlessly by design
- Delivery systems can work with researchers to develop system solutions
- Researchers can find delivery systems and/or provider networks with which to partner on implementation-oriented funding proposals and studies
Getting an evidence based journal club into practice in a medium secure foren...Clare Payne
A Nurse Therapist and Outreach Librarian talk about their joint venture in setting up an evidence based journal club in a medium secure forensic hospital with the aim of leading to practice change. They discuss the evidence based principles that the club applied in practice, what worked well, and what didn't, the barriers they faced, the topics that arose in discussion, the resulting attitudinal and behavioural changes and practical outcomes to date. See notes for further detail.
Keeping It Real:Resources for Implementing Evidence-based Public Health Progr...MargaretFarrell
Through this workshop, participants will
not only become familiar with how to use the tools they need to identity and address health outcomes, but
understand the benefits of virtual communities of practice as a means to engage researchers and practitioners around implementing cancer control programs.
will introduce participants to the Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T portal and the Research to Reality Community of Practice. (#NCIR2R)
Presentation given at the NATIONAL HEALTH OUTREACH CONFERENCE (#NHOC) Promoting Connections to Create Healthy Individuals, Families and Communities May 8, 2015
Patient Engagement for Data Science, Technology & EngineeringCHICommunications
Learn the necessities and relationship between patient engagement and data science, engineering and technology.
Presented by Trish Roche, CHI's Knowledge Translation Practice Lead, this presentation is geared towards professionals in data science looking to hone their skills in patient engagement.
Why Patient Engagement Matters in Data Science, Engineering and TechnologyCHICommunications
This presentation, delivered on February 28, 2024, discusses and defines patient-oriented research as it relates to the fields of data science, engineering and technology.
Participants also learned about CHI's annual Preparing for Research by Engaging Patient and Public Partners (PREPPP) award.
chimb.ca
Utilización de la evidencia cualitativa para mejorar la inclusión de las pref...GuíaSalud
Tercera intervención de la Mesa 1 de la Jornada científica GuíaSalud 2017: La implicación de pacientes en el desarrollo de GPC. Una estrategia necesaria para mejorar la toma de decisiones. Simon Lewin
An introduction to conducting a systematic literature review for social scien...rosie.dunne
An introduction to conducting a systematic literature review for social scientists and health researchers presented by Luke van Rhoon Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway November 2020
As new payment models emerge that emphasize value over volume, providers are being compelled to look more closely at how to motivate patients—especially those with multiple chronic conditions—to actively manage their care, make better decisions and change behaviors. This editorial webinar will explore the relationships between engagement and improved health outcomes, greater patient satisfaction and better resource utilization. Our panel of experts will share proven strategies for building patients' confidence, disseminating self-management tools and making the best use of your care team.
Best Practices for Establishing an Effective Online Presence: A Panel Discussion for Academics
Overview: Join this expert panel session to learn best practices for establishing and maintaining an effective and engaging social media presence as a researcher and/or academic. Learn strategies for promoting your research, publications, conference talks and other efforts.
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this webinar, you will be able to:
Create a plan to establish a social media presence that is engaging and effective.
Identify the benefits of using multiple platforms to reach various audiences.
Plan an approach that allows you to use social media in a way that showcases your accomplishments and presents your work to the public, stakeholders, funders, and your peers.
Education Resource Center Series: Engaging Techniques for Teaching Students &...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
By the end of this workshop, participants will be able to
Identify reasons why students/scholars struggle with scientific papers
Apply provided engagement strategies to our own teaching
Plan updates for how we teach scientific papers
Digital Scholar Webinar: Understanding and using PROSPERO: International pros...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 60-minute webinar starts with an overview of why and how PROSPERO was developed. I will then show how to search the database and how to register systematic review protocol details and keep records up to date. Reflections on the 10 years since the launch of PROSPERO and the challenges the rapidly changing digital environment now presents will also be briefly covered.
Speaker
Dr. Alison Booth Senior Research Fellow, University of York, UK
Dr. Booth joined the York Trials Unit (YTU) in October 2015. She has experience in the design and conduct of a range of research methods, in particular systematic reviews, RCTs, and methodological studies. She has a background in radiography, clinical governance and research ethics. Alison is a Senior Research Fellow in YTU and also an Advisor and Impact Lead for the NIHR Research Design Service Yorkshire and Humber (RDS YH). Her particular interests are in knowledge translation, impact and transparency in research reporting.
Education Resource Center Workshop Series: Teaching, Training & Communicating...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 60-minute interactive workshop "Teaching, Training & Communicating with Those in Science Denial" is based on research by Drs. Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer recently published in their book Science Denial: Why It Happens and What To Do About It. Facilitators, including one of the book's authors, present the causes and effects of science denial and 3 strategies to improve our science messaging to various audiences including while teaching, training, and communicating with those in science denial. Participants will work with colleagues in breakout groups to practice making their own scientific communications more effective and relatable. Most scientific communicators have not been trained in psychology, so this workshop is recommended for any university faculty and researchers in the sciences and/or those assisting faculty in the sciences with their courses or other educational offerings and trainings. This might also be of interest to TAs and graduate students pursuing a career in science and/or science teaching, and those in science fields working in community engagement and/or with the media.
Digital Scholar Webinar: Clinicaltrials.gov Registration and Reporting DocumentsSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 60-minute webinar covers the basic requirements for registration and results reporting requirements in Clinicaltrials.gov. Tips and tricks will be provided, as well as the most common issues to avoid to ensure a smooth and efficient process for public posting and updates to clinical studies. Learning Objectives At the conclusion of this webinar, participants will be able to identify internal contacts and resources available to assist with their Clinicaltrials.gov registration or results reporting.
Research Ethics Forum: Ethical Challenges in Trials of Human Genome Editing a...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
In her 60-minute presentation, Professor Charo addressed Ethical Challenges in Trials of Human Genome Editing and Gene Therapy, as gene therapy and genome editing clinical trials involve ethical challenges not always found in other areas of research.
Facilitators, who are also some of the article's authors, present 3 common myths in online education and 6 related case studies from faculty who have busted those myths. Participants will work with colleagues in breakout groups to relate to the article by sharing other myths they held or heard, translating effective online teaching practices to in-person teaching, and focusing on how empathy and social interaction impact the learning experience. Particularly with many returning to in-person teaching, this workshop is recommended for university faculty and/or those assisting faculty with their courses or other educational offerings and trainings because effective online pedagogy can still be used for in-person learning.
Digital Scholar Webinar: Recruiting Research Participants Online Using RedditSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 50-minute presentation introduces r/SampleSize, a community on the website Reddit that allows for online participant recruitment without compulsory or immediate payment. It will provide an overview of best practices for recruiting participants on r/SampleSize. It will also compare r/SampleSize to Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a widely used crowdsourcing platform for recruiting research participants.
Advice from the Battleground: Inside NIH Study Sections and Common Mistakes o...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
The purpose of this seminar was to provide practical guidance to investigators who are submitting grant applications, discuss how the sections are evaluated, and go over common mistakes to avoid during the application process. The seminar included a panel of five speakers led by a moderator.
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
Title: Sense of Smell
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the primary categories of smells and the concept of odor blindness.
Explain the structure and location of the olfactory membrane and mucosa, including the types and roles of cells involved in olfaction.
Describe the pathway and mechanisms of olfactory signal transmission from the olfactory receptors to the brain.
Illustrate the biochemical cascade triggered by odorant binding to olfactory receptors, including the role of G-proteins and second messengers in generating an action potential.
Identify different types of olfactory disorders such as anosmia, hyposmia, hyperosmia, and dysosmia, including their potential causes.
Key Topics:
Olfactory Genes:
3% of the human genome accounts for olfactory genes.
400 genes for odorant receptors.
Olfactory Membrane:
Located in the superior part of the nasal cavity.
Medially: Folds downward along the superior septum.
Laterally: Folds over the superior turbinate and upper surface of the middle turbinate.
Total surface area: 5-10 square centimeters.
Olfactory Mucosa:
Olfactory Cells: Bipolar nerve cells derived from the CNS (100 million), with 4-25 olfactory cilia per cell.
Sustentacular Cells: Produce mucus and maintain ionic and molecular environment.
Basal Cells: Replace worn-out olfactory cells with an average lifespan of 1-2 months.
Bowman’s Gland: Secretes mucus.
Stimulation of Olfactory Cells:
Odorant dissolves in mucus and attaches to receptors on olfactory cilia.
Involves a cascade effect through G-proteins and second messengers, leading to depolarization and action potential generation in the olfactory nerve.
Quality of a Good Odorant:
Small (3-20 Carbon atoms), volatile, water-soluble, and lipid-soluble.
Facilitated by odorant-binding proteins in mucus.
Membrane Potential and Action Potential:
Resting membrane potential: -55mV.
Action potential frequency in the olfactory nerve increases with odorant strength.
Adaptation Towards the Sense of Smell:
Rapid adaptation within the first second, with further slow adaptation.
Psychological adaptation greater than receptor adaptation, involving feedback inhibition from the central nervous system.
Primary Sensations of Smell:
Camphoraceous, Musky, Floral, Pepperminty, Ethereal, Pungent, Putrid.
Odor Detection Threshold:
Examples: Hydrogen sulfide (0.0005 ppm), Methyl-mercaptan (0.002 ppm).
Some toxic substances are odorless at lethal concentrations.
Characteristics of Smell:
Odor blindness for single substances due to lack of appropriate receptor protein.
Behavioral and emotional influences of smell.
Transmission of Olfactory Signals:
From olfactory cells to glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, involving lateral inhibition.
Primitive, less old, and new olfactory systems with different path
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,sisternakatoto
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group of receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a teamof receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a team wwww.lisywomensclinic.co.za/
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdfAnujkumaranit
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. It encompasses tasks such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding. AI technologies are revolutionizing various fields, from healthcare to finance, by enabling machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
Title: Sense of Taste
Presenter: Dr. Faiza, Assistant Professor of Physiology
Qualifications:
MBBS (Best Graduate, AIMC Lahore)
FCPS Physiology
ICMT, CHPE, DHPE (STMU)
MPH (GC University, Faisalabad)
MBA (Virtual University of Pakistan)
Learning Objectives:
Describe the structure and function of taste buds.
Describe the relationship between the taste threshold and taste index of common substances.
Explain the chemical basis and signal transduction of taste perception for each type of primary taste sensation.
Recognize different abnormalities of taste perception and their causes.
Key Topics:
Significance of Taste Sensation:
Differentiation between pleasant and harmful food
Influence on behavior
Selection of food based on metabolic needs
Receptors of Taste:
Taste buds on the tongue
Influence of sense of smell, texture of food, and pain stimulation (e.g., by pepper)
Primary and Secondary Taste Sensations:
Primary taste sensations: Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter, Umami
Chemical basis and signal transduction mechanisms for each taste
Taste Threshold and Index:
Taste threshold values for Sweet (sucrose), Salty (NaCl), Sour (HCl), and Bitter (Quinine)
Taste index relationship: Inversely proportional to taste threshold
Taste Blindness:
Inability to taste certain substances, particularly thiourea compounds
Example: Phenylthiocarbamide
Structure and Function of Taste Buds:
Composition: Epithelial cells, Sustentacular/Supporting cells, Taste cells, Basal cells
Features: Taste pores, Taste hairs/microvilli, and Taste nerve fibers
Location of Taste Buds:
Found in papillae of the tongue (Fungiform, Circumvallate, Foliate)
Also present on the palate, tonsillar pillars, epiglottis, and proximal esophagus
Mechanism of Taste Stimulation:
Interaction of taste substances with receptors on microvilli
Signal transduction pathways for Umami, Sweet, Bitter, Sour, and Salty tastes
Taste Sensitivity and Adaptation:
Decrease in sensitivity with age
Rapid adaptation of taste sensation
Role of Saliva in Taste:
Dissolution of tastants to reach receptors
Washing away the stimulus
Taste Preferences and Aversions:
Mechanisms behind taste preference and aversion
Influence of receptors and neural pathways
Impact of Sensory Nerve Damage:
Degeneration of taste buds if the sensory nerve fiber is cut
Abnormalities of Taste Detection:
Conditions: Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Dysgeusia (parageusia)
Causes: Nerve damage, neurological disorders, infections, poor oral hygiene, adverse drug effects, deficiencies, aging, tobacco use, altered neurotransmitter levels
Neurotransmitters and Taste Threshold:
Effects of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) on taste sensitivity
Supertasters:
25% of the population with heightened sensitivity to taste, especially bitterness
Increased number of fungiform papillae
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
Are There Any Natural Remedies To Treat Syphilis.pdf
Community Engaged Research for NIMH Outreach Partnership
1. Holly Kiger, RN, MN, CNS
Research Navigator
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute
NIMH Outreach Partner with Mental Health America Los Angeles
323-369-8648
kiger@usc.edu
Community Engaged Research
For NIMH Outreach Partnership
Annual Meeting
April 2014
2. COMMUNITY ENGAGED RESEARCH
• Overview of Clinical and Translational Science
Awards (CTSAs)
• Overview of Community Engaged Research
• Recovery Oriented Care Collaborative —an example
of a Community Engaged Research project with our NIMH
Outreach Partner-Mental Health American Los Angeles
• Resources for you to get involved
8. New members 2010
Members
CTSA States
Participating Institutions
SoCal Consortium:
• Southern California CTSI
(at USC)
• UC San Diego
• Scripps
• UCLA
• Providence Health &
Services Southern CA
• MHALA
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CTSA CONSORTIUM
9. WHAT IS A CTSI?
Southern California Clinical and Translational
Science Institute (SC CTSI)
Preclinical Translation
and Regulatory
Support
Biostatistics &
Bioinformatics
Resources
Translational Research
Informatics
Research
Development
Clinical
Translation
Education, Career Development
& Ethics
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL
SCIENCE INSTITUTE
10. IDENTIFY COMMUNITY MENTAL
HEALTH RESEARCH PRIORITIES
FOSTER NEW
ACADEMIC/COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIPS
team matchmaking
training consultation
1
2
PROVIDE PROGRAM SUPPORT
IMPLEMENT
EVALUATE
DISSEMINATE
3
4
Mental Health/Physical
Health Integration
Age
specific
services
Access to Services
Paraprofessional
approaches
Implementing
and sustaining
EBP
Cost
effectiveness
Integration of
substance abuse
treatments
Multicultural
barriers
Research assistance with specific
projects
Track pilot projectsMentor post docs
Spirituality and
MH
New project development
11. • I am a mental health nurse and I worked as a colleague of Dave
Pilon, CEO of MHALA for over 20 years
• Three years ago I moved to SC CTSI as Research Navigator in
Community Engagement
• Academic/Community Projects with MHALA:
• Met with Dave to discuss potential projects
• Connected him with researcher from USC School of
Business to do pilot work moving MHALA to evidence based
practice status
• Invited MHALA to join PBRN group
• Invited MHALA to collaborate on NIMH Outreach Partnership,
including our Special Project-Promotores Research Training
Institute
PROJECTS WITH OUR NIMH OUTREACH PARTNER: MHALA
12. • Pilot testing of a “Health Navigator” project-- training persons
with severe mental illness to improve their access and usage of
primary medical care (instead of emergency rooms). Now have
a PCORI grant to complete a larger RCT.
• Pilot testing mindfulness interventions for children in after
school programs.
• Validation of a mental health screening tool for children
entering foster care
• Pilot testing of a 12-week, psycho-educational curriculum
designed to reduce substance use in Hispanic youth.
$1 MILLION ANNUALLY FOR SC-CTSI PILOT PROJECTS
13. OTHER GOALS
Present research findings to
providers, partners, policy-
makers, consumers and
advocates
One way—monthly e-
newsletter to 700+ and
posted on LACDMH website
14. WHAT IS COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH?
• A framework or approach for conducting
research
• Requires partnership development between
academic and community partners
• May be used with both qualitative (focus groups;
interviews) and quantitative methods
• Recognizes and builds on community strengths,
interests and perspectives
15. Traditional Research Process
Step 5: Interpret, write papers & Disseminate Results to
Peers and Academic Community
Step 4: Analyze Data
Step 3: Intervention or Data Collection
Data Collection Instruments Designed Researcher Recruits Community Subjects
Step 2: Research Plan Developed
Community Selected Funds Secured
Step 1: Problem Identified by Researcher
16. Community-Engaged Approach
Step 6: Disseminate Results to Community AND
Academics
Step 5: Interpretation of Data with Community
Step 4: Analyze Data – Bring Results to Community
Step 3: Intervention or Data Collection
All parties involved in design of data Collection instruments Community assists in participant recruitment
Step 2: Research Plan Developed
Meetings with community members and researchers to determine best approach
Step 1: Problem Identified by Stakeholder
Could be community member or researcher
17. BARRIERS TO CONDUCTING COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH
• Many researchers aren’t connected to CBOs
• Takes more time and money
• Need manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals for
their career
• Researchers have to give up some control to
community partners
• Poor communication and unrealistic expectations
can lead to conflicts between academic and
community partners
18. RATIONALE FOR COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH
• Complex health and social problems ill-
suited to “outside expert” research
• Increasing interest in health disparities
• Disappointing results with introducing
“Evidence Based Practices” in the real world
• Increasing community demands for
collaborative efforts
• Increasing funder interests in community-
driven versus community-placed research
19. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL
SCIENCE INSTITUTE
Recovery Oriented Care Collaborative
A Practice Based Research Network (PBRN)
focused on the integration of physical and mental
health of persons with severe mental illness
A PBRN is defined as a group of providers who come together to
study topics/questions directly impacting their practice, engage
researchers in answering those questions, and use the results to
improve service delivery.
20. RECOVERY ORIENTED CARE COLLABORATIVE
• Funding: SC CTSI Pilot, July 1, 2012-June 30, 2013
• Project PIs
o John Brekke, PhD, USC School of Social Work
o Rebecca Gaba, PhD, Didi Hirsch Mental Health Services
o Co-Investigator: Lyndee Knox, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, L.A.
Net
• Mental Health Agency Partners (contract agencies with Los
Angeles County Department of Mental Health)
o Mental Health America Los Angeles
o Didi Hirsch Community Mental Health Center
o Exodus Recovery
o Pacific Clinics
21. ROCC PROCESS
• Formalize partner relationships
o MOUs with 4 based mental agency organizations
o Establish steering committee
• Assemble the research team
o SC CTSI
o USC School of Social Work
o Community partners
• Select research question using reflective practitioner
process
• Conduct card study
• Analyze results
• Disseminate results
22. FOLLOW-UP
ROCC researchers analyzed
findings and are in the process of
presenting findings to the ROCC,
community members and other
researchers.
STEP 1: GENERATION
ROCC members polled 20 mental health
providers from four participating agencies at an
all day forum. We identified 99 potential
research questions that were then categorized
into 23 domains by post doctoral Fellows.
STEP 2: SELECTION
At a second all day forum, 10 topics were
discussed and refined into researchable
questions. Identified questions were
evaluated based on criteria*. A score
was given for each criterion. These
scores were tallied up for a composite
score for each question. The four
highest-scoring questions advanced to
the next step.
Criteria*
1) Will it change my
practice?
2) Will it change my
colleagues’ practices?
3) Is it feasible?
4) Is it publishable?
5) Is it fundable?
6) Is there a provider
champion?
* Knox & Lomonaco, 2005
STEP 3: EVALUATION
Following the forum, the Fellows
added literature reviews for the four
highest scoring topics and created
sample card studies for each
research question.
STEP 4: VOTE
ROCC members voted
electronically for their
preferred research
question for the card
study.
STEP 5: STUDY
The selected card study was refined
and piloted by the research team.
Following Institutional Review Board
approval data collection occurred
over several weeks at ROCC
member sites. place at member
sites.
Card Study* *Westfall et al., 2011
A card study is a simple, immediate, and cost-effective method for gathering
observational data by clinicians at the point of care. Requiring less than a
minute to complete, the survey consists of patient demographic information, a
qualifying question and, for those who qualify, follow-up questions. Patient
identifiers are not collected. PBRNs use card studies because they make it
easy to gather data across sites.
Reflective Practitioner Steps
REFLECTIVE PRACTITIONER PROCESS
23. CARD STUDY QUESTION AND FINDINGS
Research Question: “What is the impact of integrated healthcare services
on emergency room and primary care usage; physical health; mental health;
lifestyle; and ability to meet mental health treatment plan goals and overall
satisfaction with services?”
Sample: 237 participants with serious mental illness from 4 clinics
• Didi Hirsch (n = 52)
• Exodus Recovery (n = 99)
• Mental Health America (n = 48)
• Pacific Clinics (n= 38)
The majority of the sample had been receiving services for at
least 6 months (79%)
28. RECOVERY ORIENTED CARE COLLABORATIVE
NEXT STEPS
• Disseminate research findings
o ROCC members
o Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health
o Potential new ROCC members
o White paper
o Professional journals
o Local, state, and national conferences
• Decide on next research project
• Secure funding
29. Resources
For a list of CTSAs: https://www.ctsacentral.org/institutions
Other Potential Research Partners:
• Schools of Nursing, Social Work, or Psychology
• Authors of relevant research articles
For more information about Community Engaged Research
• A Quick Start Guide to Conducting Community Engaged Research
http://sc-ctsi.org/assets/ce/Booklet.pdf
• Community Engaged Research 101 video
http://vimeopro.com/scctsiecde/sc-ctsi-ecde-studio-
catalog/video/55632203
For information about PBRNs: http://pbrn.ahrq.gov/
More information: Contact Holly Kiger @ kiger@usc.edu
or 323-369-8648
Editor's Notes
mental health, obesity and diabetes, cancer, access to care, cultural competency, health literacy, and scientific literacy
Different approaches
Traditionally health researchers have used a research approach common throughout scientific disciplines. Researchers develop research questions, write proposals, secure funds, conduct the research and analysis and write papers. This slide shows the traditional research process.
Community-engaged research builds upon the established steps of traditional research. The difference is the relationship between the community and the researchers and how the community participates throughout the research process. In community-engaged research, researchers and community agencies or groups form a partnership. The strength and intensity of this partnership varies by project and participants. Communities and researchers may collaborate in many different ways, including defining the problem, planning the research, making decisions about elements of intervention implementation, and sharing the presentation of the research results.
For example, in California the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union (HERE) was concerned about high rates of injuries and musculoskeletal problems among hotel cleaners. The union thought these problems were job related and contacted researchers at the University of California about doing a study. The union had identified research priorities and some of the research methodology: they wanted the hotel workers to be involved with data collection, and they also wanted the study to be scientifically sound. Researchers collaborated with the union and its members to identify potential risks and contributing factors; design a survey for hotel workers; and recruit and train a group of workers to administer the survey. After analysis of the survey results, researchers held focus groups with the hotel workers to examine the findings and solicit explanations and interpretations from the workers. Researchers wrote a report and the union was able to use it as a bargaining tool with management for improved work conditions.
Different approaches
Traditionally health researchers have used a research approach common throughout scientific disciplines. Researchers develop research questions, write proposals, secure funds, conduct the research and analysis and write papers. This slide shows the traditional research process.
Community-engaged research builds upon the established steps of traditional research. The difference is the relationship between the community and the researchers and how the community participates throughout the research process. In community-engaged research, researchers and community agencies or groups form a partnership. The strength and intensity of this partnership varies by project and participants. Communities and researchers may collaborate in many different ways, including defining the problem, planning the research, making decisions about elements of intervention implementation, and sharing the presentation of the research results.
For example, in California the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union (HERE) was concerned about high rates of injuries and musculoskeletal problems among hotel cleaners. The union thought these problems were job related and contacted researchers at the University of California about doing a study. The union had identified research priorities and some of the research methodology: they wanted the hotel workers to be involved with data collection, and they also wanted the study to be scientifically sound. Researchers collaborated with the union and its members to identify potential risks and contributing factors; design a survey for hotel workers; and recruit and train a group of workers to administer the survey. After analysis of the survey results, researchers held focus groups with the hotel workers to examine the findings and solicit explanations and interpretations from the workers. Researchers wrote a report and the union was able to use it as a bargaining tool with management for improved work conditions.