Poster: Perspectives on Increasing Competency in Using Digital Practices and ...Katja Reuter, PhD
We believe that the quality and efficiency of all phases of the clinical and translational research (CTR) process can potentially be increased by using digital practices and tools in open and networked contexts. However, most CT researchers lack the training to take advantage of the benefits that the Internet and the social Web provide. Standardized training in digital practices and tools (Digital Scholarship) to conduct CTR has not been formalized through structured curriculum, learning approaches, and evaluation. Our overall goal is to develop a robust curriculum to train CTR researchers in digital scholarship. Here we present preliminary data from a qualitative study that describes the range of key stakeholders’ perspectives on the need to: (A) formalize educational efforts in digital scholarship among CTR trainees; and (B) develop an educational framework that defines core competencies, methods, and evaluation methods.
What we learned so far in a nutshell:
1. There was consistent support for a structured program to train CTR scientists to develop competency in digital research practices and approaches.
2. Participants considered all existing CTR and additional suggested competency areas relevant.
3. New training areas suggested by participants: network analysis, citizen science, crowdsourcing, machine learning, digital health training, computing, data management and licensing, among others.
4. A education program focused on digital scholarship should include a step-wise approach to meet different research and training goals. allowing attendees to increase their awareness through flexible online learning modules and lectures as well as specialized in-person and hands-on experience, also including consultations, coaching, and networking.
4. The development of a clear definition for “digital scholarship” in the context of CTR, program goals and evaluation metrics represents challenges that require further exploration.
5. Next steps: To establish consensus among the focus groups attendees regarding necessary components of a CTR-focused curriculum through a follow-up questionnaire.
Presented at Translational Science 2018 conference in Washington, DC on April 20, 2018.
In this talk, we’ll look at the process of designing a research methodology. Is it better to stick to the safety of the lab, or to broaden our horizons? And how can we convince colleagues and stakeholders to buy into the decision? We’ll introduce a set of principles and a thinking tool to help you weigh up and justify your approach.
This stack of slides describes my view on how to work as a PhD student. The presentation was targeted a Ubiquitous Computing audience, but is fairly generic in nature.
Poster: Perspectives on Increasing Competency in Using Digital Practices and ...Katja Reuter, PhD
We believe that the quality and efficiency of all phases of the clinical and translational research (CTR) process can potentially be increased by using digital practices and tools in open and networked contexts. However, most CT researchers lack the training to take advantage of the benefits that the Internet and the social Web provide. Standardized training in digital practices and tools (Digital Scholarship) to conduct CTR has not been formalized through structured curriculum, learning approaches, and evaluation. Our overall goal is to develop a robust curriculum to train CTR researchers in digital scholarship. Here we present preliminary data from a qualitative study that describes the range of key stakeholders’ perspectives on the need to: (A) formalize educational efforts in digital scholarship among CTR trainees; and (B) develop an educational framework that defines core competencies, methods, and evaluation methods.
What we learned so far in a nutshell:
1. There was consistent support for a structured program to train CTR scientists to develop competency in digital research practices and approaches.
2. Participants considered all existing CTR and additional suggested competency areas relevant.
3. New training areas suggested by participants: network analysis, citizen science, crowdsourcing, machine learning, digital health training, computing, data management and licensing, among others.
4. A education program focused on digital scholarship should include a step-wise approach to meet different research and training goals. allowing attendees to increase their awareness through flexible online learning modules and lectures as well as specialized in-person and hands-on experience, also including consultations, coaching, and networking.
4. The development of a clear definition for “digital scholarship” in the context of CTR, program goals and evaluation metrics represents challenges that require further exploration.
5. Next steps: To establish consensus among the focus groups attendees regarding necessary components of a CTR-focused curriculum through a follow-up questionnaire.
Presented at Translational Science 2018 conference in Washington, DC on April 20, 2018.
In this talk, we’ll look at the process of designing a research methodology. Is it better to stick to the safety of the lab, or to broaden our horizons? And how can we convince colleagues and stakeholders to buy into the decision? We’ll introduce a set of principles and a thinking tool to help you weigh up and justify your approach.
This stack of slides describes my view on how to work as a PhD student. The presentation was targeted a Ubiquitous Computing audience, but is fairly generic in nature.
Research presentation tips for seniors, graduate students, & researchers. Cover 4 phases of presenting - Plan, Prepare, Practice, & Present. Also include practical tips that are believed to be not very useful.
“Focus group interviews typically have five characteristics or features: (a) people, who (b) possess certain characteristics, (c) provide data (d) of a qualitative nature (e) in a focused discussion.”
-Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (Krueger)
The representation and mediation of history and a survey of Philippine history - one of the courses I handle at Entrepreneurs School of Asia, an international business school in the Philippines
Research presentation tips for seniors, graduate students, & researchers. Cover 4 phases of presenting - Plan, Prepare, Practice, & Present. Also include practical tips that are believed to be not very useful.
“Focus group interviews typically have five characteristics or features: (a) people, who (b) possess certain characteristics, (c) provide data (d) of a qualitative nature (e) in a focused discussion.”
-Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (Krueger)
The representation and mediation of history and a survey of Philippine history - one of the courses I handle at Entrepreneurs School of Asia, an international business school in the Philippines
Learn about ACT and bonus material from Child Teacher Relationship Training. Learn a few of the didactic lessons from the filial therapy model developed by Dr Garry Landreth and Dr Sue Bratton from the Center for Play Therapy. Christy Graham teaches this at conferences for child care professionals to deep their skills and help them join to lead the children they love.
10 times better, when negative self talk strikesSatyen Khashu
Very often when you are facing a problem, you start the negative spiral of self talk. People have known to spend hours, thinking and reflecting through negative spirals of self talk. Asking yourself high quality questions is one way of directing your brain attention to the outcome and not to the negative thoughts. Try these 2 set of questions and find out how they impact how you feel and the quality of your thoughts.
The pictures in the slideshow are copy-and-pasted from various webpages. Leave a comment below if you're concerned that I've used an image inappropriately.
Customer Discovery: Interviewing Tips and TechniquesCIMIT
This presentation aims to share tips for conducting productive interviews and techniques for asking the right questions to help you get the information you need directly from those who matter most... your customers.
Presented at the 2017 Women's Leadership Conference at Clemson University.
An observation of the effects of misguided advice on women in choosing college majors and professions as well as social ramifications.
Theoretical Frameworks II
Cognitive Theoretical Framework
Assignment Resources:
· "Cognitive Therapy Background," located below.
· Therapy Session 1: Read the case of Gwen on page 302. And answer at least three questions for reflection on Page 303.
· Therapy Session 2: the cognitive therapy session between Karen and Dr. McAuliffe below. Take notes on the interaction between Karen and Dr. McAuliffe.
· Complete the written assignment according to the assignment directions.
Cognitive Therapy Background
Cognitive therapists believe in changing clients’ inaccurate perceptions of themselves and their environments by uncovering faulty beliefs that are causing personal and interpersonal problems. Coming from the behavioral tradition, cognitive therapists believe thoughts can be considered behaviors which can be modified. Such modification occurs through the “disputation” of thoughts and by experimenting with new behaviors.
Many cognitive therapists believe that problems in living are caused by cognitive schemas or “floor plans” that influence how people make sense of the world. Once these cognitive schemas have been identified, the therapist helps the client uncover the moment-to-moment automatic thoughts that fuel the continuation of the schema. The counselor then helps the client discover the cognitive errors in those automatic thoughts. Examples of just a few of these include: all or nothing thinking, such as believing that life is either great or horrible; overgeneralization, such as believing that one must be fearful of flying because planes have crashed; and personalization, or seeing oneself as the cause of negative events such as believing that one was the reason for his or her parents’ divorce.
Today, most cognitive therapists believe in establishing a therapeutic alliance through careful listening and by collaborating with the client as they help him or her understand the cognitive therapy process. Cognitive therapists use questions to probe the client’s way of thinking. Eventually, therapists help the client acquire more adaptive thoughts and assist the client in devising a plan that includes practicing new behaviors that will reinforce new thoughts.
Cognitive therapists believe clients can make dramatic changes in how they think and act; however, they tend to focus on coping, not curing the client. Changing embedded ways of thinking and behaving does not occur easily.
Let’s see how Dr. Garrett McAuliffe helps Karen identify cognitive distortions as she works on issues related to how fear of loss has led her to avoid commitments in her life.
Cognitive Therapy Session
Dr. McAuliffe: Karen, hi again.
Karen: Hi
Dr. McAuliffe: We met once before and we talked about your fear of loss, and how it connects to your fear of commitment at this time in your life. I asked you to monitor some thoughts you might have had around specific incidents in your relationship and write down those thoughts when you felt a sense of dread about t ...
You've decided you're going to go to uni and it's time to tell your friends and family. As a first in family student, this might be daunting, but we've got your back with the best ways to keep your cool during this potentially challenging chat.
Similar to Education Resource Center: Tips for Collecting High-Quality Qualitative Data (20)
Best Practices for Establishing an Effective Online Presence: A Panel Discussion for Academics
Overview: Join this expert panel session to learn best practices for establishing and maintaining an effective and engaging social media presence as a researcher and/or academic. Learn strategies for promoting your research, publications, conference talks and other efforts.
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this webinar, you will be able to:
Create a plan to establish a social media presence that is engaging and effective.
Identify the benefits of using multiple platforms to reach various audiences.
Plan an approach that allows you to use social media in a way that showcases your accomplishments and presents your work to the public, stakeholders, funders, and your peers.
Education Resource Center Series: Engaging Techniques for Teaching Students &...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
By the end of this workshop, participants will be able to
Identify reasons why students/scholars struggle with scientific papers
Apply provided engagement strategies to our own teaching
Plan updates for how we teach scientific papers
Digital Scholar Webinar: Understanding and using PROSPERO: International pros...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 60-minute webinar starts with an overview of why and how PROSPERO was developed. I will then show how to search the database and how to register systematic review protocol details and keep records up to date. Reflections on the 10 years since the launch of PROSPERO and the challenges the rapidly changing digital environment now presents will also be briefly covered.
Speaker
Dr. Alison Booth Senior Research Fellow, University of York, UK
Dr. Booth joined the York Trials Unit (YTU) in October 2015. She has experience in the design and conduct of a range of research methods, in particular systematic reviews, RCTs, and methodological studies. She has a background in radiography, clinical governance and research ethics. Alison is a Senior Research Fellow in YTU and also an Advisor and Impact Lead for the NIHR Research Design Service Yorkshire and Humber (RDS YH). Her particular interests are in knowledge translation, impact and transparency in research reporting.
Education Resource Center Workshop Series: Teaching, Training & Communicating...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 60-minute interactive workshop "Teaching, Training & Communicating with Those in Science Denial" is based on research by Drs. Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer recently published in their book Science Denial: Why It Happens and What To Do About It. Facilitators, including one of the book's authors, present the causes and effects of science denial and 3 strategies to improve our science messaging to various audiences including while teaching, training, and communicating with those in science denial. Participants will work with colleagues in breakout groups to practice making their own scientific communications more effective and relatable. Most scientific communicators have not been trained in psychology, so this workshop is recommended for any university faculty and researchers in the sciences and/or those assisting faculty in the sciences with their courses or other educational offerings and trainings. This might also be of interest to TAs and graduate students pursuing a career in science and/or science teaching, and those in science fields working in community engagement and/or with the media.
Digital Scholar Webinar: Clinicaltrials.gov Registration and Reporting DocumentsSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 60-minute webinar covers the basic requirements for registration and results reporting requirements in Clinicaltrials.gov. Tips and tricks will be provided, as well as the most common issues to avoid to ensure a smooth and efficient process for public posting and updates to clinical studies. Learning Objectives At the conclusion of this webinar, participants will be able to identify internal contacts and resources available to assist with their Clinicaltrials.gov registration or results reporting.
Research Ethics Forum: Ethical Challenges in Trials of Human Genome Editing a...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
In her 60-minute presentation, Professor Charo addressed Ethical Challenges in Trials of Human Genome Editing and Gene Therapy, as gene therapy and genome editing clinical trials involve ethical challenges not always found in other areas of research.
Facilitators, who are also some of the article's authors, present 3 common myths in online education and 6 related case studies from faculty who have busted those myths. Participants will work with colleagues in breakout groups to relate to the article by sharing other myths they held or heard, translating effective online teaching practices to in-person teaching, and focusing on how empathy and social interaction impact the learning experience. Particularly with many returning to in-person teaching, this workshop is recommended for university faculty and/or those assisting faculty with their courses or other educational offerings and trainings because effective online pedagogy can still be used for in-person learning.
Digital Scholar Webinar: Recruiting Research Participants Online Using RedditSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
This 50-minute presentation introduces r/SampleSize, a community on the website Reddit that allows for online participant recruitment without compulsory or immediate payment. It will provide an overview of best practices for recruiting participants on r/SampleSize. It will also compare r/SampleSize to Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a widely used crowdsourcing platform for recruiting research participants.
Advice from the Battleground: Inside NIH Study Sections and Common Mistakes o...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
The purpose of this seminar was to provide practical guidance to investigators who are submitting grant applications, discuss how the sections are evaluated, and go over common mistakes to avoid during the application process. The seminar included a panel of five speakers led by a moderator.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Education Resource Center: Tips for Collecting High-Quality Qualitative Data
1. Tips for Collecting
High-Quality
Qualitative Data
With
Dr. Rachel Carmen Ceasar, Assistant Professor of Clinical
Population & Public Health Sciences, KSOM Population & Public
Health Sciences, University of Southern California
Dr. Katherine Guevara, Associate Director of Clinical & Translational
Research Education Programs, SC CTSI Workforce Development
at the University of Southern California
2. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
10 tips to better interview
Cheat sheet
1. No hypothetical questions.
2. No close-ended questions.
3. No leading questions.
4. Be polite.
5. Be quiet.
6. It’s not about you.
7. Avoid validation.
8. Keep it conversational.
9. Using silence.
10. Avoid intervention or dictating what’s normal.
Finding meaning in patterns
39
3. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#1: No hypothetical questions
Better interviews
• Avoid hypothetical or scenario questions
• Plant questions in actual situations, local
• Situate questions grounded in little details
they’ve already thrown out
• Example:
• XX Would you use this service in the
future? XX
• What’s missing from this service?
40
4. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#2: No close-ended questions
Better interviews
• Avoid yes/no questions—it’s not a survey
• Example:
• Rachel: You like the vibe of this church for vaccination?
• Nina: Yeah, I like the vibe of this church.
• XX Do you like this EMR feature? XX
• How has this EMR feature helped you in your work?
• XX Do you use cannabis a lot? XX
• When did you last use cannabis?
41
5. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#3: No leading questions
Better interviews
• Let participants paint the picture for you
in their own words—don’t fill it in for
them
• Example:
• XX Do you get testing every month?
If not, why not? XX
• How often do you go to the doctor /
clinic?
42
6. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#4: Be polite
Better interviews
• Avoid using “you guys” to refer to women and other
colloquiums (“Oh that sucks”)
• Start with titles (Dr., Mrs. X) and let them direct you on how
they want to be called
• Don’t test them or prove them wrong—you’re not trying to
uncover THE TRUTH
• Example:
• XX That’s funny because in an earlier interview, someone
said that that hospital is closed now? XX
• XX So they just took your opioids for no reason at all? XX
• Rachel: The stat I heard was that more women are
misdiagnosed for bladder cancer, is that true?
Cecilia: I don’t know that stat.
43
7. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#5: Be quiet.
Better interviews
• Avoid “hmmms” and responding every
time participant responds
• Show you’re listening with non-verbal
clues
• Imagine trying to get nice clean chunks
of conversation + short line of question /
clarification coming from you
44
10. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#6: It’s not about you
Better interviews
• “Listening session”
• Example:
Brent: Back in September of last year, I had a problem
with my heart where it was beating too fast. I don’t
know if you know what an ablation is.
Rachel: I do b/c my dad, yeah.
Brent: So they had to —
Rachel: —My dad had to have open heart surgery, and
I remember—-
Brent: —have one of those because…
47
11. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#7: Avoid validation.
Better interviews
• Don’t validate or give +/- of you feel
about their answer
• Example:
Rachel: Why do you prefer that clinic
over the DTLA one?
Carmen: Convenience.
Rachel: That’s cool.
48
12. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#7: Avoid validation.
Better interviews
• Don’t push participant in a direction of how you want
them to respond (eg, what’s good / cool)
• ‘We’ve never heard that before’
• ‘That’s really great”
• Example:
Rachel: Where do you frequently purchase vaping
products?
Carmen: There’s a corner shop where I live—they let
me hang out and bring my dog so.
Rachel: Awesome, I love that.
49
13. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#7: Avoid validation.
Better interviews
• Don’t need to give feedback
• Example:
Samuel: I kinda just wanted to smoke
my weed at that party, and others were
doing it too so I did.
Rachel: It’s normal. So have you ever
introduced anyone to smoking?
50
14. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#8: Keep it conversational.
Better interviews
• Not trying to get to all your questions or get
to next question—it’s not a survey.
• Example:
Cecilia: I mean I’m aware of the health risk
involved with vaping because last week—
Rachel: —Ok. So some people vape b/c it’s
really hard to stop smoking cigarettes.
Would you say that sentence resonates
with you?
51
15. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#8: Keep it conversational.
Better interviews
• Example:
Rachel: So the first time you smoked cannabis, what did you use?
Samuel: Yeah.
Rachel: Do you remember what you used?
Samuel: No I don’t.
Rachel: Okay. Do you remember liking it?
Samuel: Yeah.
Rachel: Did it have mostly THC in it? B/c sometimes people mix CBD…
Samuel: No, I’m not sure.
Rachel: Okay. Do you remember liking the physical feeling of the THC effects
from it?
Samuel: No.
Rachel: Okay. You just liked the CBD part.
Samuel: Uh huh.
Rachel: Ok.
Samuel: Yeah.
52
16. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#8: Keep it conversational.
Better interviews
• The order of the interview guide is just a suggestion
• Memorize the interview guide and have second
interviewer ask follow up questions from guide and
their listening
• Example:
Anita: Before it was like okay, there’s just a joint
and a bong but now there’s pens, and devices, and
all kinds of names for them it’s so funny.
Rachel: Ok, ok we are actually about to get into
those questions right now. So—what’s in your
joint?
53
17. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#9: Using silence
Better interviews
• When in doubt what to do with yourself,
take a pause
• Body language
• Breaks and breaths
54
18. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#10: Avoid intervention or dictating what’s normal
Better interviews
• Not an opportunity to give medical advice
(even if you’re a medical professional!) or life
advice
• Example:
Anita: I used to run cross country but since
the accident, I’m so reliant on my pain meds
to just do basic walking. Then I gained all this
weight from not being able to get around. I
know these pills are killing me I know it.
Rachel: Well we don’t know that yet.
55
19. A recording and modified version of this presentation will be available to you for personal reference afterwards.
#10: Avoid intervention or dictating what’s normal
Better interviews
• Listening vs. reacting
• Don’t wait to get to sensitive question to say it’s sensitive
• Emotions in interviewing?
• Example:
Anita: We’ll sometimes get together my dad and I and smoke and drink
together, like on the weekends.
Rachel: Ok.
Anita: We’ll like smoke some cannabis, nothing crazy.
Rachel: Right so you guys will have a few beers and eat dinner type thing?
Anita: Sort of…
Rachel: Sort of?
Anita: He doesn’t eat dinner.
56
20. Request a Consult - BERD
https://sc-ctsi.org/resources/qualitative-
research-consultation
21. Request a Consult - ERC
https://sc-ctsi.org/resources/education-resource-center
22. Thank You!
SC CTSI | www.sc-ctsi.org Phone: (323) 442-4032 Email: info@sc-ctsi.org Twitter: @SoCalCTSI
Cite us: This work was supported by grants UL1TR001855 and UL1TR000130 from the National Center for Advancing
Translational Science (NCATS) of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors
and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
3