Brain ppt
•Download as PPT, PDF•
4 likes•1,992 views
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that detects whether specific information is stored in a person's brain. It works by presenting stimuli related to a crime or event and measuring brainwave responses, particularly the P300 response. If the P300 response is elicited, it suggests the person has knowledge of the event stored in their memory. The technique has potential applications in criminal investigations to identify criminals and exonerate the innocent. However, it also has limitations and requires more research.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Brain finger printing
The document discusses brain fingerprinting, a technique used to determine what information is stored in a brain. It has four phases and can be applied to counterterrorism, national security, medical diagnosis, advertising, and criminal justice. Brain fingerprinting measures the P300 brainwave response to stimuli and has been found admissible in court, with a record of 100% accuracy in tests. While it provides benefits like increased national security and medical diagnosis, it also raises concerns around privacy infringement and potential inaccuracies.
11 brain finger printing
Brain fingerprinting is a technology that measures brain wave responses to determine if a subject has information about a specific crime. It works by presenting the subject with probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli related to a crime while recording their brain waves. Any responses to targets, which contain key details only the perpetrator would know, would indicate that information is present in their brain. It has been used in criminal investigations and national security cases with an accuracy of 100% to determine if a subject has information about a crime or is concealing knowledge. While it can detect if information is present, it cannot determine how the information was obtained. The goal is to implement this technology worldwide to help discover the truth in investigations.
Brain fingerprinting
This document summarizes the scientific technique of Brain Fingerprinting, which detects the presence or absence of specific information stored in a person's brain based on their brainwave responses. It works by presenting words, pictures, or sounds related to a crime to a subject while measuring their brainwaves using an EEG headset. A specific brain response called the P300 indicates whether the information is familiar to the subject or not. Case studies on FBI agents and CIA professionals demonstrated 100% accuracy in detecting who had knowledge of certain events.
Brain finger printing
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell to determine if specific information is stored in a person's brain. It works by measuring electrical brain waves in response to visual stimuli related to a crime. Target stimuli that only the perpetrator would recognize produce a measurable brain response that indicates information is present. Brain fingerprinting has been used in over 170 cases to help identify criminals and determine if witnesses have truthful information about a crime. It provides a quick, scientific way to determine if a person has knowledge of a crime. However, it cannot indicate criminal intent and may be difficult to distinguish criminals from witnesses.
Brainfingerprinting 110820000245-phpapp02
The document discusses brain fingerprinting, a technique used to determine what information is stored in a brain. It has four phases and can be applied to counterterrorism, national security, medical diagnosis, advertising, and criminal justice. Brain fingerprinting measures the P300 brainwave response to stimuli and has been found admissible in court, with a record of 100% accuracy in tests. While it provides benefits like improving national security and medical diagnosis, concerns include potential privacy infringements and overreliance on the results.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brain scans to determine if a person has specific information stored in their brain. It works by measuring brain responses called P300s and MERMERs when a person is exposed to target, irrelevant, and probe stimuli. If a person recognizes a probe, it elicits a P300/MERMER response that is comparable to the target response, indicating they have the relevant information stored. It has been found to be 100% accurate in tests and one court recognized it as valid scientific evidence. Further research is still needed but it has potential to be a major criminal investigation tool.
Brain fingerprinting detail report
Abstract:
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Introduction:
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes..
Bftabstract 100130091506-phpapp01
Brain Fingerprinting is a technique that measures brain wave responses to words or images related to a crime. It aims to identify perpetrators by detecting recognition responses in the brain to crime-relevant details only the guilty party would know. The test presents stimuli to a subject and measures their brain's electrical activity using sensors. Reactions to probes containing crucial crime details are compared to reactions to irrelevant stimuli to identify a memory and encoding related multifaceted electroencephalographic response, indicating familiarity with those key details. Proponents argue this can accurately determine if a subject has prior knowledge of a crime, while critics dispute its validity.
Recommended
Brain finger printing
The document discusses brain fingerprinting, a technique used to determine what information is stored in a brain. It has four phases and can be applied to counterterrorism, national security, medical diagnosis, advertising, and criminal justice. Brain fingerprinting measures the P300 brainwave response to stimuli and has been found admissible in court, with a record of 100% accuracy in tests. While it provides benefits like increased national security and medical diagnosis, it also raises concerns around privacy infringement and potential inaccuracies.
11 brain finger printing
Brain fingerprinting is a technology that measures brain wave responses to determine if a subject has information about a specific crime. It works by presenting the subject with probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli related to a crime while recording their brain waves. Any responses to targets, which contain key details only the perpetrator would know, would indicate that information is present in their brain. It has been used in criminal investigations and national security cases with an accuracy of 100% to determine if a subject has information about a crime or is concealing knowledge. While it can detect if information is present, it cannot determine how the information was obtained. The goal is to implement this technology worldwide to help discover the truth in investigations.
Brain fingerprinting
This document summarizes the scientific technique of Brain Fingerprinting, which detects the presence or absence of specific information stored in a person's brain based on their brainwave responses. It works by presenting words, pictures, or sounds related to a crime to a subject while measuring their brainwaves using an EEG headset. A specific brain response called the P300 indicates whether the information is familiar to the subject or not. Case studies on FBI agents and CIA professionals demonstrated 100% accuracy in detecting who had knowledge of certain events.
Brain finger printing
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell to determine if specific information is stored in a person's brain. It works by measuring electrical brain waves in response to visual stimuli related to a crime. Target stimuli that only the perpetrator would recognize produce a measurable brain response that indicates information is present. Brain fingerprinting has been used in over 170 cases to help identify criminals and determine if witnesses have truthful information about a crime. It provides a quick, scientific way to determine if a person has knowledge of a crime. However, it cannot indicate criminal intent and may be difficult to distinguish criminals from witnesses.
Brainfingerprinting 110820000245-phpapp02
The document discusses brain fingerprinting, a technique used to determine what information is stored in a brain. It has four phases and can be applied to counterterrorism, national security, medical diagnosis, advertising, and criminal justice. Brain fingerprinting measures the P300 brainwave response to stimuli and has been found admissible in court, with a record of 100% accuracy in tests. While it provides benefits like improving national security and medical diagnosis, concerns include potential privacy infringements and overreliance on the results.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brain scans to determine if a person has specific information stored in their brain. It works by measuring brain responses called P300s and MERMERs when a person is exposed to target, irrelevant, and probe stimuli. If a person recognizes a probe, it elicits a P300/MERMER response that is comparable to the target response, indicating they have the relevant information stored. It has been found to be 100% accurate in tests and one court recognized it as valid scientific evidence. Further research is still needed but it has potential to be a major criminal investigation tool.
Brain fingerprinting detail report
Abstract:
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Introduction:
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes..
Bftabstract 100130091506-phpapp01
Brain Fingerprinting is a technique that measures brain wave responses to words or images related to a crime. It aims to identify perpetrators by detecting recognition responses in the brain to crime-relevant details only the guilty party would know. The test presents stimuli to a subject and measures their brain's electrical activity using sensors. Reactions to probes containing crucial crime details are compared to reactions to irrelevant stimuli to identify a memory and encoding related multifaceted electroencephalographic response, indicating familiarity with those key details. Proponents argue this can accurately determine if a subject has prior knowledge of a crime, while critics dispute its validity.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell to detect information stored in the brain. It works by measuring brain wave responses called MERMERs that are elicited when a person sees or hears familiar information. During a brain fingerprinting test, a subject views stimuli while wearing an EEG cap to record brain waves, and the presence or absence of a MERMER can indicate whether information is stored in their memory. It has applications in national security, medical diagnosis of conditions like Alzheimer's, and improving advertising effectiveness. Studies have found it to identify criminals and stored information with 100% accuracy.
Brain Fingerprinting Technology
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell in 1999 to determine what information is stored in a person's brain. It works by measuring brain wave responses, specifically the P300 wave, to visual or audio stimuli. A sequence of target, irrelevant, and probe stimuli are presented while monitoring brain waves to see if a greater response occurs to probes related to information stored in the memory. The technique has potential applications in national security, medical diagnosis, advertising, and the criminal justice system, though concerns exist around privacy infringements and potential inaccuracy.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brain wave responses to determine if a person has information related to a crime stored in their brain. It presents words or images from a crime to a suspect and measures the brain's P300 response, which occurs when the brain recognizes something significant. It has been over 100% accurate in tests. The technique involves presenting targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes to a subject and using brain wave analysis to detect if a memory encoding response differs for probes related to a crime. If the analysis finds information present, it could help identify perpetrators in a scientific, accurate way.
Brain finger printing
Brain Fingerprinting is a technique used to determine scientifically what information is, or is not stored in a particular brain.
Brain Finger Printing was invented by Dr B .S. Farwell chief scientist and president of human brain research and laboratory , USA
Brainfingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brain wave responses to determine if a person has information related to a crime stored in their brain. It presents words or images from a crime to a suspect and measures the brain's P300 response, which occurs when the brain recognizes something significant. It has been over 100% accurate in tests. The technique involves presenting targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes to a subject and analyzing their brain waves to detect if they have a memory encoding related electroencephalographic response, indicating information is present about the crime. If no response is detected to the probes, it determines the information is absent from their brain.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a proposed technique to detect deception or concealed knowledge through measuring brain wave responses to stimuli related to a crime. It uses electroencephalography sensors to measure electrical activity in the brain when a person is exposed to relevant or irrelevant words, phrases or images. Proponents argue it can determine whether a person has specific knowledge about a crime scene or event. However, the document concludes that neither brain fingerprinting nor other brain imaging approaches have enough evidence to demonstrate their accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in courts.
Brain Fingerprinting
What is Brain Fingerprinting
MERMER mythology
Principle
Technique
What is EEG?
Working
Phases of Brain Fingerprinting
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING
Brain fingerprinting is an investigative technique that measures brain wave responses to words, phrases or pictures to determine if an individual recognizes specific information related to an event. It involves wearing a headband with sensors to measure EEG signals while being presented relevant and irrelevant stimuli on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting has four stages - investigation, subject interview, scientific testing, and adjudication - and has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including for the FBI, US intelligence, and US Navy.
Brain finger printing presentation
Brain fingerprinting is a forensic technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect electrical brain activity associated with specific knowledge stored in a subject's brain. The technique presents stimuli and measures EEG responses like the P300 wave, which occurs about 300 milliseconds after seeing a significant stimulus. Brain fingerprinting has been used to screen job applicants, study advertising effectiveness, and aid criminal investigations by determining whether suspects have information related to a crime. However, it only detects information and not intent or how the information was obtained. It also has limitations like not detecting lies or accounting for memory factors.
Scientific Consensus on Brain Fingerprinting and Differing Views on the Scien...
The following proposed Scientific Consensus on Brain fingerprinting has arisen from discussionsamong forensic scientists, legal experts, psychophysiologists, and experts in law enforcementand national security. These discussions were initiated by Lawrence A. Farwell. This is a workin progress. Discussions of these and other related issues are ongoing. Please refer commentsand suggestions to Lawrence A. Farwell at LFarwell@brainwavescience.com .The most fundamental point of consensus among scientists and other relevant experts regardingbrain fingerprinting, forensic science, and science in general is that different methods producedifferent results. Brain fingerprinting, from the seminal Farwell and Donchin (1986; 1991) andFarwell and Smith (2001) papers to the present, has never produced an error, neither a falsenegative nor a false positive. Some alternative methods of applying the same brain responses inattempts to detect concealed information have resulted in 10% to 15% errors and in some casesas high as nearly 50% errors, no better than chance. Even some purported “replications” ofFarwell and Donchin have in fact used fundamentally different methods. Consequently theyhave failed to achieve accuracy approaching that of brain fingerprinting and, unlike brainfingerprinting, are susceptible to countermeasures. These fundamental differences in scientificmethods are the reason why brain fingerprinting has been successfully applied in the field andruled admissible in court, and these alternative methods are unsuitable for field use or applicationin the criminal justice system or national security.In developing this consensus, we have specified precisely the standard scientific methods thatconstitute brain fingerprinting and attempted to identify the specific standards that are necessaryand sufficient to obtain the results that brain fingerprinting has consistently attained. We havesought to identify differences in methods that are responsible for the widely divergent resultsobtained in different laboratories conducting related research.Fundamental brain fingerprinting scientific principles, methods, and scientific standards arebriefly described the first section of this article. The proposed Scientific Consensus on BrainFingerprinting presumes a thorough understanding of the information contained therein. It alsoassumes familiarity with the articles in the literature cited in the Background section below.In the course of developing a consensus, some points have arisen on which there is considerablediversity of opinion. Some of these Differing Views on Brain Fingerprinting are briefly outlinedfollowing the Scientific Consensus on Brain Fingerprinting.
Brain Finger Printing
The document discusses brain fingerprinting, a forensic technique that measures brainwaves to determine if a subject has information stored in their brain related to a crime. It works by measuring the P300 brainwave, which occurs 300 milliseconds after exposure to significant stimuli. The subject views words or images while wearing an EEG cap, and the P300 response to relevant "probe" stimuli indicates if the information is stored in their brain. The technique is used in criminal investigations and other applications like diagnosing Alzheimer's and evaluating advertising effectiveness, though it only detects the presence of information and not intent or how the information was obtained.
Brain Fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a forensic technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to determine if specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It works by presenting stimuli related to an event and measuring brain responses. P300 MERMER responses indicate recognition of known information. The technique has been used for counterterrorism, criminal cases, medical research, and evaluating advertising campaigns. It involves investigating a case, interviewing the subject, conducting the brain fingerprinting test, and adjudicating guilt or innocence. The technique detects stored information but not how it was obtained or intent. It cannot be used if the suspect knows all available details or there are no distinguishing probe stimuli.
Brain Finger Printing
This document discusses Brain Fingerprinting, a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell to identify perpetrators of crimes by measuring brain wave responses to crime-relevant stimuli. It works by presenting words/images to a subject wearing an EEG cap and analyzing the MERMER response in the brain, which occurs when the brain recognizes familiar information. The document outlines how Brain Fingerprinting works, its applications in national security, medicine, and advertising, and its invention and testing, concluding it could be a revolutionary criminal investigative tool.
Brain Finger-Printing
Most efficient slides on Brain Fingerprinting are listed here.
This is a technology which is most useful for forensic science.
A seminar based presentation is listed here
For any more details contact me-
0091-8943307844
or
nibelmd@gmail.com
Brain Finger Printing Technology
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial forensic science technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It does this by measuring electrical brainwave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen (Farwell & Smith 2001, Farwell, Richardson, and Richardson 2012).
Brain Finger Printing
This document provides an overview of brain fingerprinting, including:
1. It describes brain fingerprinting as a technique that uses EEG to measure brain responses to relevant and irrelevant stimuli to determine if information about a crime is stored in a subject's brain.
2. The technique involves presenting subjects with targets they know, probes relevant to a crime they may know about, and irrelevant stimuli while measuring EEG responses like the P300 wave.
3. It discusses the role of brain fingerprinting in criminal investigations, which involves phases of investigation to identify relevant probes, interviewing the subject, conducting the scientific brain fingerprinting test, and adjudication of guilt or innocence.
Brainfingerprinting 110326085605-phpapp01
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to measure electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures presented on a computer screen. It is designed to determine if an individual recognizes specific crime-related information by detecting a P300 brain wave, which occurs when a person recognizes meaningful stimuli. The test presents targets the person is expected to recognize, irrelevant stimuli, and probes related to the crime. If probes elicit a P300, it indicates the person has knowledge of the crime. Brain fingerprinting is said to detect guilty knowledge more accurately than polygraph tests and has been over 100% accurate in tests. However, its accuracy is disputed by some researchers.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a scientific technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect whether specific information is stored in a person's brain. It measures brain wave responses when presented with probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli related to a crime. The technique was invented by Lawrence Farwell and is based on detecting a brain response called MERMER when a person recognizes known information. It has four phases and has been admitted as evidence in courts. Brain fingerprinting can help identify criminals, terrorists, and exonerate innocent suspects by detecting if crime-related information is present or absent from their brains.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain wave responses when a subject is exposed to crime-relevant stimuli. It aims to identify perpetrators based on the premise that details of crimes they committed will be stored in their brain, triggering a P300 brain signal. The technique has been shown to be 100% accurate in tests. It can help identify criminals, terrorists, and members of criminal groups by accessing crime evidence stored in their brain. However, it only detects what information is stored, not how it got there or if the subject is lying.
Gps
The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite-based navigation system consisting of 24 satellites orbiting the Earth. GPS satellites transmit signal information that GPS receivers on the ground use to calculate the user's exact location through triangulation. For a 2D position, a receiver needs signals from at least 3 satellites, and 4 satellites are needed for a 3D position. Civilian GPS accuracy is around 3-5 meters and can be improved to less than 3 meters with WAAS or DGPS corrections.
I-Mode TECHNOLOGY
I-mode is a mobile internet (as opposed to wireless internet) service popular in Japan. Unlike Wireless Application Protocol or WAP, i-mode encompasses a wider variety of internet standards, including web access-mail and the packet-switched network that delivers the data. I-mode users have access to various services such as e-mail, sports results, weather forecast, games, financial services and ticket booking. Content is provided by specialized services, typically from the mobile carrier, which allows them to have tighter control over billing. Like WAP, i-mode delivers only those services that are specifically converted for the service, or are converted through gateways. This has placed both systems at a disadvantage against handsets that use "real" browser software, and generally use a flat pricing structure for data. Even I-mode's creator, Takeshi Natsuno, has stated "I believe the Linksys iPhone (a phone that uses the traditional TCP/IP model) is closer to the mobile phone of the future, compared with the latest Japanese mobile phones."
More Related Content
What's hot
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell to detect information stored in the brain. It works by measuring brain wave responses called MERMERs that are elicited when a person sees or hears familiar information. During a brain fingerprinting test, a subject views stimuli while wearing an EEG cap to record brain waves, and the presence or absence of a MERMER can indicate whether information is stored in their memory. It has applications in national security, medical diagnosis of conditions like Alzheimer's, and improving advertising effectiveness. Studies have found it to identify criminals and stored information with 100% accuracy.
Brain Fingerprinting Technology
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell in 1999 to determine what information is stored in a person's brain. It works by measuring brain wave responses, specifically the P300 wave, to visual or audio stimuli. A sequence of target, irrelevant, and probe stimuli are presented while monitoring brain waves to see if a greater response occurs to probes related to information stored in the memory. The technique has potential applications in national security, medical diagnosis, advertising, and the criminal justice system, though concerns exist around privacy infringements and potential inaccuracy.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brain wave responses to determine if a person has information related to a crime stored in their brain. It presents words or images from a crime to a suspect and measures the brain's P300 response, which occurs when the brain recognizes something significant. It has been over 100% accurate in tests. The technique involves presenting targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes to a subject and using brain wave analysis to detect if a memory encoding response differs for probes related to a crime. If the analysis finds information present, it could help identify perpetrators in a scientific, accurate way.
Brain finger printing
Brain Fingerprinting is a technique used to determine scientifically what information is, or is not stored in a particular brain.
Brain Finger Printing was invented by Dr B .S. Farwell chief scientist and president of human brain research and laboratory , USA
Brainfingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brain wave responses to determine if a person has information related to a crime stored in their brain. It presents words or images from a crime to a suspect and measures the brain's P300 response, which occurs when the brain recognizes something significant. It has been over 100% accurate in tests. The technique involves presenting targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes to a subject and analyzing their brain waves to detect if they have a memory encoding related electroencephalographic response, indicating information is present about the crime. If no response is detected to the probes, it determines the information is absent from their brain.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a proposed technique to detect deception or concealed knowledge through measuring brain wave responses to stimuli related to a crime. It uses electroencephalography sensors to measure electrical activity in the brain when a person is exposed to relevant or irrelevant words, phrases or images. Proponents argue it can determine whether a person has specific knowledge about a crime scene or event. However, the document concludes that neither brain fingerprinting nor other brain imaging approaches have enough evidence to demonstrate their accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in courts.
Brain Fingerprinting
What is Brain Fingerprinting
MERMER mythology
Principle
Technique
What is EEG?
Working
Phases of Brain Fingerprinting
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING
Brain fingerprinting is an investigative technique that measures brain wave responses to words, phrases or pictures to determine if an individual recognizes specific information related to an event. It involves wearing a headband with sensors to measure EEG signals while being presented relevant and irrelevant stimuli on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting has four stages - investigation, subject interview, scientific testing, and adjudication - and has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including for the FBI, US intelligence, and US Navy.
Brain finger printing presentation
Brain fingerprinting is a forensic technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect electrical brain activity associated with specific knowledge stored in a subject's brain. The technique presents stimuli and measures EEG responses like the P300 wave, which occurs about 300 milliseconds after seeing a significant stimulus. Brain fingerprinting has been used to screen job applicants, study advertising effectiveness, and aid criminal investigations by determining whether suspects have information related to a crime. However, it only detects information and not intent or how the information was obtained. It also has limitations like not detecting lies or accounting for memory factors.
Scientific Consensus on Brain Fingerprinting and Differing Views on the Scien...
The following proposed Scientific Consensus on Brain fingerprinting has arisen from discussionsamong forensic scientists, legal experts, psychophysiologists, and experts in law enforcementand national security. These discussions were initiated by Lawrence A. Farwell. This is a workin progress. Discussions of these and other related issues are ongoing. Please refer commentsand suggestions to Lawrence A. Farwell at LFarwell@brainwavescience.com .The most fundamental point of consensus among scientists and other relevant experts regardingbrain fingerprinting, forensic science, and science in general is that different methods producedifferent results. Brain fingerprinting, from the seminal Farwell and Donchin (1986; 1991) andFarwell and Smith (2001) papers to the present, has never produced an error, neither a falsenegative nor a false positive. Some alternative methods of applying the same brain responses inattempts to detect concealed information have resulted in 10% to 15% errors and in some casesas high as nearly 50% errors, no better than chance. Even some purported “replications” ofFarwell and Donchin have in fact used fundamentally different methods. Consequently theyhave failed to achieve accuracy approaching that of brain fingerprinting and, unlike brainfingerprinting, are susceptible to countermeasures. These fundamental differences in scientificmethods are the reason why brain fingerprinting has been successfully applied in the field andruled admissible in court, and these alternative methods are unsuitable for field use or applicationin the criminal justice system or national security.In developing this consensus, we have specified precisely the standard scientific methods thatconstitute brain fingerprinting and attempted to identify the specific standards that are necessaryand sufficient to obtain the results that brain fingerprinting has consistently attained. We havesought to identify differences in methods that are responsible for the widely divergent resultsobtained in different laboratories conducting related research.Fundamental brain fingerprinting scientific principles, methods, and scientific standards arebriefly described the first section of this article. The proposed Scientific Consensus on BrainFingerprinting presumes a thorough understanding of the information contained therein. It alsoassumes familiarity with the articles in the literature cited in the Background section below.In the course of developing a consensus, some points have arisen on which there is considerablediversity of opinion. Some of these Differing Views on Brain Fingerprinting are briefly outlinedfollowing the Scientific Consensus on Brain Fingerprinting.
Brain Finger Printing
The document discusses brain fingerprinting, a forensic technique that measures brainwaves to determine if a subject has information stored in their brain related to a crime. It works by measuring the P300 brainwave, which occurs 300 milliseconds after exposure to significant stimuli. The subject views words or images while wearing an EEG cap, and the P300 response to relevant "probe" stimuli indicates if the information is stored in their brain. The technique is used in criminal investigations and other applications like diagnosing Alzheimer's and evaluating advertising effectiveness, though it only detects the presence of information and not intent or how the information was obtained.
Brain Fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a forensic technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to determine if specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It works by presenting stimuli related to an event and measuring brain responses. P300 MERMER responses indicate recognition of known information. The technique has been used for counterterrorism, criminal cases, medical research, and evaluating advertising campaigns. It involves investigating a case, interviewing the subject, conducting the brain fingerprinting test, and adjudicating guilt or innocence. The technique detects stored information but not how it was obtained or intent. It cannot be used if the suspect knows all available details or there are no distinguishing probe stimuli.
Brain Finger Printing
This document discusses Brain Fingerprinting, a technique developed by Dr. Lawrence Farwell to identify perpetrators of crimes by measuring brain wave responses to crime-relevant stimuli. It works by presenting words/images to a subject wearing an EEG cap and analyzing the MERMER response in the brain, which occurs when the brain recognizes familiar information. The document outlines how Brain Fingerprinting works, its applications in national security, medicine, and advertising, and its invention and testing, concluding it could be a revolutionary criminal investigative tool.
Brain Finger-Printing
Most efficient slides on Brain Fingerprinting are listed here.
This is a technology which is most useful for forensic science.
A seminar based presentation is listed here
For any more details contact me-
0091-8943307844
or
nibelmd@gmail.com
Brain Finger Printing Technology
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial forensic science technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It does this by measuring electrical brainwave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen (Farwell & Smith 2001, Farwell, Richardson, and Richardson 2012).
Brain Finger Printing
This document provides an overview of brain fingerprinting, including:
1. It describes brain fingerprinting as a technique that uses EEG to measure brain responses to relevant and irrelevant stimuli to determine if information about a crime is stored in a subject's brain.
2. The technique involves presenting subjects with targets they know, probes relevant to a crime they may know about, and irrelevant stimuli while measuring EEG responses like the P300 wave.
3. It discusses the role of brain fingerprinting in criminal investigations, which involves phases of investigation to identify relevant probes, interviewing the subject, conducting the scientific brain fingerprinting test, and adjudication of guilt or innocence.
Brainfingerprinting 110326085605-phpapp01
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to measure electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures presented on a computer screen. It is designed to determine if an individual recognizes specific crime-related information by detecting a P300 brain wave, which occurs when a person recognizes meaningful stimuli. The test presents targets the person is expected to recognize, irrelevant stimuli, and probes related to the crime. If probes elicit a P300, it indicates the person has knowledge of the crime. Brain fingerprinting is said to detect guilty knowledge more accurately than polygraph tests and has been over 100% accurate in tests. However, its accuracy is disputed by some researchers.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a scientific technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect whether specific information is stored in a person's brain. It measures brain wave responses when presented with probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli related to a crime. The technique was invented by Lawrence Farwell and is based on detecting a brain response called MERMER when a person recognizes known information. It has four phases and has been admitted as evidence in courts. Brain fingerprinting can help identify criminals, terrorists, and exonerate innocent suspects by detecting if crime-related information is present or absent from their brains.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain wave responses when a subject is exposed to crime-relevant stimuli. It aims to identify perpetrators based on the premise that details of crimes they committed will be stored in their brain, triggering a P300 brain signal. The technique has been shown to be 100% accurate in tests. It can help identify criminals, terrorists, and members of criminal groups by accessing crime evidence stored in their brain. However, it only detects what information is stored, not how it got there or if the subject is lying.
What's hot (20)
Scientific Consensus on Brain Fingerprinting and Differing Views on the Scien...
Scientific Consensus on Brain Fingerprinting and Differing Views on the Scien...
Viewers also liked
Gps
The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite-based navigation system consisting of 24 satellites orbiting the Earth. GPS satellites transmit signal information that GPS receivers on the ground use to calculate the user's exact location through triangulation. For a 2D position, a receiver needs signals from at least 3 satellites, and 4 satellites are needed for a 3D position. Civilian GPS accuracy is around 3-5 meters and can be improved to less than 3 meters with WAAS or DGPS corrections.
I-Mode TECHNOLOGY
I-mode is a mobile internet (as opposed to wireless internet) service popular in Japan. Unlike Wireless Application Protocol or WAP, i-mode encompasses a wider variety of internet standards, including web access-mail and the packet-switched network that delivers the data. I-mode users have access to various services such as e-mail, sports results, weather forecast, games, financial services and ticket booking. Content is provided by specialized services, typically from the mobile carrier, which allows them to have tighter control over billing. Like WAP, i-mode delivers only those services that are specifically converted for the service, or are converted through gateways. This has placed both systems at a disadvantage against handsets that use "real" browser software, and generally use a flat pricing structure for data. Even I-mode's creator, Takeshi Natsuno, has stated "I believe the Linksys iPhone (a phone that uses the traditional TCP/IP model) is closer to the mobile phone of the future, compared with the latest Japanese mobile phones."
I - Mode Technology
i-mode is a wireless service developed by NTT DoCoMo that provides email, internet access, and other multimedia services to mobile phones. It uses cHTML, a subset of HTML, to display webpages on small screens. i-mode was launched in 1999 and became very popular in Japan with over 45 million subscribers due to its convenient features. It uses a packet-switched network and protocols based on TCP/IP to deliver an "always on" internet experience to users on-the-go.
I mode ppt
i-mode was launched in Japan in 1999 as a wireless internet service. Unlike WAP, i-mode uses a wider variety of internet standards over a packet-switched network, allowing access to services like email, games, and financial services. Content is provided through mobile carriers who control billing. i-mode works through a packet network, i-mode server, and information providers. It provides constant connectivity without usage charges. Security includes password protection and securing private networks.
Gps ppt
GPS is a satellite-based navigation system consisting of 24 satellites operated by the US Department of Defense. It provides positioning anywhere in the world without subscription fees. GPS determines location by measuring the time it takes signals from satellites to reach a receiver and using that to calculate the distance to the satellites, whose locations are known. Combining distance measurements to multiple satellites triangulates the receiver's position.
Concept of gps
The Global Positioning System (GPS) uses satellites and receivers to locate positions on Earth. GPS satellites continuously transmit radio signals that are used by receivers to calculate their position using trilateration. The GPS system consists of space, control, and user segments - with satellites in space transmitting signals, control stations monitoring the satellites and sending corrections, and users employing receivers. A receiver needs signals from at least three satellites to determine a two-dimensional position, and four or more for greater accuracy.
Viewers also liked (6)
Similar to Brain ppt
Brain fingerprinting detail report
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes.
Brain Fingerprinting.ppt
Brain Fingerprinting is a scientific technique that detects whether specific information about a crime is stored in a suspect's brain. It presents words, pictures, or sounds related to the crime to the subject while measuring brainwave responses, particularly the P300 response emitted only when the information is familiar. Two types of stimuli are used: probes related to the crime details and targets the subject is told to respond to. Case studies on government agents and real crimes found the technique was 100% accurate in determining who had knowledge of the crime details stored in their brain.
finall
Brain fingerprinting is a technique developed by Lawrence Farwell that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect electrical brain wave patterns that are elicited when a person encounters familiar stimuli. It is based on the finding that the brain generates a unique P300 wave approximately 300 milliseconds after recognizing a familiar stimulus. The technique presents subjects with irrelevant, target, and probe stimuli and measures brain waves to determine if the probes elicit a P300, indicating the subject has knowledge of that information. It has potential applications in criminal investigations, medical diagnosis, counterterrorism, and other fields by objectively detecting what information is stored in a person's brain.
Brainfingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses EEG to measure electrical brain wave responses to stimuli presented on a computer in order to determine if a person has specific information stored in their brain. It works by presenting probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli and measuring brain waves like P300 responses. The brain waves are analyzed using algorithms to determine if information is present or absent. It has been used in criminal cases and national security screenings with a reported 100% accuracy rate. However, it cannot determine how the information was acquired and may not work if the suspect has been exposed to the same information from other sources.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain Fingerprinting is scientific technique to determine whether or not specific information is stored in an individual's brain.
Ruled Admissible in one US Court as scientific evidence.
It has a record of 100% Accuracy.
Rushita beladiya.pdf
This document provides information about a case study report submitted by Rushita Beladiya on the topic of brain fingerprinting. It includes sections on introduction, abstract, history, technical aspects, background/terminology, current uses/research, limitations, future applications/research, and conclusion. Rushita conducted this case study under the guidance of her professor Seema Joshi for her Information Technology department.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that measures brain activity to determine if specific information is stored in a person's brain. It presents stimuli to a subject wearing an electrode cap and measures the brain's P300 response, which occurs when the brain recognizes familiar information. Targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes are shown. A match between a probe and a P300 response indicates the information is present, while a match to an irrelevant response suggests it is absent. Studies have found it can accurately detect if information is present or absent in about 90% of cases.
Brain fingerprinting
This document summarizes a seminar presentation on brain fingerprinting technology. Brain fingerprinting uses EEG to measure electrical brain wave responses, specifically the P300 wave, to stimuli presented on a computer in order to determine if individuals have hidden information stored in their brains. It works by presenting probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli and analyzing the brain's differential response. There are four phases: evidence collection, brain evidence collection, computer analysis, and determining guilt or innocence. Unlike polygraph tests, it does not rely on physiological responses but on cognitive brain responses. Case studies showed it correctly identified information stored in a murder suspect's brain and its potential use in identifying trained terrorists.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect electrical brain activity associated with recognition of familiar stimuli. It presents targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes to measure the brain's reaction. If a probe elicits the same reaction as a target, it indicates the information is stored in the brain. The technique is claimed to determine with over 90% accuracy whether specific information is stored in a person's brain. It has potential applications in criminal investigations, terrorism investigations, medical research, and other fields.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect electrical brain activity associated with recognition of familiar stimuli. It presents targets, irrelevant stimuli, and probes to a subject and compares their brain responses. If probes elicit the same response as targets, it suggests the information is present in the subject's brain. An accuracy rate of 100% has been found in tests of the technique. It has potential applications in criminal investigations, terrorism investigations, medical research, and other fields. However, more research is still needed to validate its reliability for use as legal evidence.
Brain fingerprinting ppt by ramana babu
Brain fingerprinting is a technique that uses brainwave responses to determine if specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It measures electrical brainwave activity (ERPs) through an EEG as a subject views words, phrases or images. A P300 wave indicates the brain recognizes relevant information. Brain fingerprinting has been used in criminal investigations and screening for employment or national security roles. However, it only detects what information is present, not how it was acquired or any intentions. It also cannot detect lies, only stored information.
Beosp and narco
Brain Electrical Oscillation Signature Profiling and Narco Analysis are widely used to determine criminal behavior.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a forensic technique that uses EEG to detect if specific crime-related information is stored in a subject's brain. It works by measuring brainwave responses when subjects are shown crime-related words or images. The technique was invented in 1995 and uses cognitive brain responses, rather than emotions, to identify if information about a crime is present or absent in the brain. It has potential applications in criminal justice, national security, and medical diagnosis.
Brain fingerprinting
Brain fingerprinting is a forensic technique that detects if a person has information stored in their brain related to a criminal investigation. It works by measuring brain waves in response to visual stimuli and comparing the response to known and unknown information. It was developed by Lawrence Farwell and can detect information with high accuracy within one second, before a person can consciously mask their response. It has various applications in criminal investigations and national security.
Brain Fingerprinting Technology
Brain Fingerprinting is a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including felony crimes. Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court. In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Brain fingerprinting technology
Brain Fingerprinting is a new technology that uses brain wave responses to identify whether a suspect has knowledge of crime details. It presents images/words related to the crime (probes) and measures if the brain responds differently, indicating stored memory. It is 100% accurate in over 120 tests. The process involves collecting crime evidence, measuring brain waves in response to probes/irrelevants, analyzing responses, and determining if information is present/absent in the brain. Results are scientifically objective and non-invasive. Field tests on actual cases show it can correctly identify guilty and innocent individuals.
Brain fingerprinting
This document provides an introduction to brain fingerprinting, which is a technique used in criminal investigations to determine if a suspect recognizes details about a crime. It works by measuring electrical brain wave responses when probes related to the crime are presented. The probes are divided into different categories, and the brain responses are compared between probes the suspect should recognize based on involvement in the crime versus those they would not. Requirements for the test and its applications in criminal justice, medical fields, and national security are discussed, along with some limitations. The conclusion states it has a 100% accuracy record in research and cases.
Brain fingerprinting technology final
Brain fingerprinting is a new lie detection technique that measures brain wave activity in response to crime-related stimuli to identify whether the details of a crime are stored in the subject's memory, indicating guilt, as it has been shown the brain generates unique patterns for familiar information. It works by presenting words or images to the subject and detecting a MERMER (memory and encoding related multifaceted electroencephalographic response) if the brain recognizes a probe stimulus related to the crime details. Proponents argue it can objectively determine if a subject has knowledge of a crime stored in their brain.
BRAIN
Brain fingerprinting is a scientific technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to detect whether specific information is stored in a person's brain. It measures brain wave responses when presented with probes, targets, and irrelevant stimuli related to a crime. The technique was invented by Lawrence Farwell and is based on detecting the P300 brain response, also called the MERMER, which indicates recognition of known information. Brain fingerprinting has been admitted in courts and can help identify criminals, terrorists, and exonerate innocent suspects by detecting what information is stored in their brains.
Similar to Brain ppt (20)
More from kondalarao7
surface copmputer
(1) Microsoft Surface is a large multi-touch tabletop computer that responds to touch, gestures, and physical objects placed on its surface. It uses infrared cameras and light to track input.
(2) The first prototypes were developed in the early 2000s, with the goal of creating a device that seamlessly combines the physical and digital worlds.
(3) Key features include direct interaction, multi-touch input, multi-user collaboration, and object recognition capabilities. It allows users to grab and manipulate digital information with their hands.
Google earth
Google Earth is a virtual globe program that displays satellite images of Earth allowing users to view locations from above. It supports 3D models and GIS data. Users can search locations, enter coordinates, view places in 23 languages. Features include Street View, a flight simulator, and sky viewing mode to see stars. It requires basic system specifications and is available in free, Plus, and Pro versions with different export and data options.
Ppt
The document discusses the history and evolution of electronic commerce from the 1970s to present day. It describes how electronic commerce has developed from early electronic funds transfer and data interchange between businesses to the rise of the World Wide Web and e-commerce. The document also outlines key components of electronic commerce systems including infrastructure, business models, functions, technologies, security issues, and potential benefits and challenges.
Wireless usb
Wireless USB is a short-range, high-bandwidth wireless protocol that allows devices to connect without cables, up to speeds of 480 Mbps. It uses ultra-wideband radio technology in the 3.1-10.6 GHz range to provide a wireless version of USB with the same features and speeds. Wireless USB aims to be interoperable across devices and platforms, with low power usage and high security through encryption. Initial products are beginning to be released in 2007, with wider adoption expected in later years if issues around interference and competing standards can be addressed.
Wi fi
WiFi refers to wireless local area network technologies based on IEEE 802.11 standards. The goal of 802.11 is to specify MAC and physical layer specifications for wireless connectivity within local areas. No license is required to use 802.11 devices in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz public frequency bands. There are two types of wireless access points: hardware access points with set network interfaces, and software access points that provide more flexibility in network types. Key features of 802.11 include supporting mobility within and between basic service sets, while addressing difficulties like hidden terminals, interference and limited spectrum. Security has evolved from weak WEP to stronger TKIP and AES encryption. Standards like 802.11b,
Web spoofing
Web spoofing allows an attacker to create a fake version of the entire web in order to trick victims. The attacker rewrites URLs on web pages so they link to the attacker's server instead of the real server. When the victim interacts with forms or links, their data and browsing is redirected to the attacker's server without their knowledge. While the victim sees secure connections, these are actually to the attacker's server, not the intended site. The attacker can then observe and modify any private information submitted by the victim.
Telephony
Internet telephony involves transmitting voice signals over the Internet using Voice over IP (VoIP) technology. This allows real-time voice communication between devices using software like Cool Talk and NetMeeting. VoIP calls between computers are free, while calls from VoIP to regular phones have lower costs than traditional telephone services. Popular software products for VoIP include Speak Freely and Net Speak Web Phone, while hardware VoIP boxes allow phone connectivity between multiple offices. Internet telephony allows voice, video, and text communication over PCs and between PCs and phones in different scenarios.
Google chrome operating system
Google announced an open source operating system called Chrome OS in November 2009. Based on the Linux family and Ubuntu, Chrome OS is designed to be used primarily for web applications with an emphasis on being always connected, instantly booting up, having security built in, and automatically receiving updates. Chrome notebooks boot up in about 10 seconds, resume from sleep instantly, and provide the same experience across devices with apps, documents and settings stored in the cloud.
Srikanth
Honeypots are security resources that are designed to be probed, attacked, or compromised in order to detect unauthorized access. They work by providing resources that are expected to receive no traffic, so any traffic received is likely unauthorized. There are different types of honeypots used for law enforcement or research purposes. Honeypots excel at detection of attacks or unauthorized access due to advantages like reducing false positives and negatives and providing valuable data, but they also have disadvantages like narrow visibility and risks if used improperly. The level of interaction a honeypot allows determines how much functionality and information it can provide, with higher interaction providing more insight but also more complexity and risk.
Sms2
The document discusses Short Message Service (SMS), including its basic network architecture, elements, signaling, services, applications, comparison to other services like paging, limitations, and future developments like Enhanced Messaging Service (EMS) and Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS). SMS allows transmission of alphanumeric messages between mobile subscribers and external systems, with benefits like guaranteed delivery, low cost, and delivery to multiple subscribers. It uses elements like the SMSC, HLR, VLR, and MSC to route messages via the air interface to mobile devices.
Smart card ppt
Smart cards are plastic cards with embedded computer chips that store and transact data. They were first used in France in the 1980s for payment in pay phones. Contact smart cards have electrical contacts that connect to readers and transmit data via signals like power, reset, clock, and input/output. They are now used widely for banking, transportation, healthcare and more. Smart cards improve security over other machine-readable cards by providing secure authentication, encryption, passwords, biometrics and more. Standards like ISO 7816 and 14443 govern smart card interfaces and communication.
Robotics
This document provides an overview of robotics, including definitions, components of robots, laws of robotics, applications, and the future of robotics. It defines robotics as the science of designing or building robots and their applications. Robots have three main components - a brain (computer), actuators and mechanical parts, and sensors. Isaac Asimov created three laws of robotics focusing on not harming humans. The future of robotics predicts that robots will play an increasing role in society by performing dangerous, repetitive, costly, or precise tasks.
Presentation virtual keybord_2
The document introduces virtual keyboards, which use sensor technology and artificial intelligence to allow users to type on any surface like a regular keyboard. Virtual keyboards project a keyboard image that users can type on, and the software recognizes the keys. They are compact and allow typing anywhere, but require practice and are more expensive than traditional keyboards. Virtual keyboards may be used with smartphones, PDAs, games and as TV remotes.
Money pad ppt
The document discusses the future of digital payments and introduces the "Money pad", a device that will replace physical wallets and allow users to store digital cash and financial information. The Money pad uses biometric fingerprint recognition for secure authentication and can be used to perform remote electronic payments and transactions. It provides advantages over traditional payment methods like credit cards by enabling instant clearing of funds and more secure encryption during transactions. The Money pad is proposed as a solution that meets the future requirements of instant fund transfers, payment security, and elimination of physical payment methods.
Jamer
Cell phone jammers work by transmitting signals that block the communication between a cell phone and the cell tower. They can disrupt phone service within a range of 30 feet for low-powered devices up to 1 mile for higher-powered units used by law enforcement. While jammers were originally developed for security purposes, their use is illegal in most countries due to interfering with electronic transmissions. Advocates argue they can be used to maintain order in public places, while critics note they inconvenience people and could block important calls.
Intel core presentation mnk
This document provides information about Intel Core microprocessors. It discusses the different types of Intel Core processors including Core i7, Core i5, Core i3, Core 2 Solo, Core 2 Duo, Core 2 Quad, Core 2 Extreme, Pentium M, and Conroe. It describes the microarchitectures and target markets for each processor family. It also includes images of different Intel Core processors such as Core i9, Core i7, and Conroe microprocessor.
Google chrome operating system
Google announced an open source operating system called Chrome OS in November 2009. Based on the Linux family and Ubuntu, Chrome OS is designed to be used primarily for web applications with an emphasis on being always connected, instantly booting up, having security built in, and automatically receiving updates. Chrome notebooks boot up in about 10 seconds and resume from sleep instantly while providing access to web apps, the cloud, and integrated Wi-Fi and 3G connectivity.
Generations of mobile
1. The document provides an overview of the generations of mobile networks from 1G to 4G. 2. The key aspects covered include the introduction dates and technologies used for each generation as well as their main features and applications. 3. The evolution of networks increased data speeds and capabilities at each stage, from analog 1G to digital 2G with SMS and email, to 3G enabling internet access and video calls, and 4G providing further increases in speed and advanced multimedia services.
Embedded systems
1. The document discusses embedded systems, which combine computer hardware and software to perform specific functions within larger systems or devices.
2. Embedded systems differ from general purpose computers in that they are designed for specific applications rather than being generic. Real-time embedded systems have strict timing constraints for completing tasks.
3. Common components of embedded systems include processors, memory, inputs and outputs. Design considerations include processing power, memory, cost, lifespan and reliability. C programming is commonly used for developing embedded system software.
Digital scents
Digital scent technology aims to enhance virtual reality experiences by stimulating the sense of smell. Pioneers in the field digitized smells from their chemical profiles and developed hardware like scent synthesizers and cartridges to emit scents from a computer. Potential applications include marketing products with scented webpages, entertainment like scented video games, and education by pairing smells with multimedia. However, the high costs and challenges of reproducing complex smells limit the technology currently to niche uses.
More from kondalarao7 (20)
Recently uploaded
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
5th Power Grid Model Meet-up
It is with great pleasure that we extend to you an invitation to the 5th Power Grid Model Meet-up, scheduled for 6th June 2024. This event will adopt a hybrid format, allowing participants to join us either through an online Mircosoft Teams session or in person at TU/e located at Den Dolech 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands. The meet-up will be hosted by Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), a research university specializing in engineering science & technology.
Power Grid Model
The global energy transition is placing new and unprecedented demands on Distribution System Operators (DSOs). Alongside upgrades to grid capacity, processes such as digitization, capacity optimization, and congestion management are becoming vital for delivering reliable services.
Power Grid Model is an open source project from Linux Foundation Energy and provides a calculation engine that is increasingly essential for DSOs. It offers a standards-based foundation enabling real-time power systems analysis, simulations of electrical power grids, and sophisticated what-if analysis. In addition, it enables in-depth studies and analysis of the electrical power grid’s behavior and performance. This comprehensive model incorporates essential factors such as power generation capacity, electrical losses, voltage levels, power flows, and system stability.
Power Grid Model is currently being applied in a wide variety of use cases, including grid planning, expansion, reliability, and congestion studies. It can also help in analyzing the impact of renewable energy integration, assessing the effects of disturbances or faults, and developing strategies for grid control and optimization.
What to expect
For the upcoming meetup we are organizing, we have an exciting lineup of activities planned:
-Insightful presentations covering two practical applications of the Power Grid Model.
-An update on the latest advancements in Power Grid -Model technology during the first and second quarters of 2024.
-An interactive brainstorming session to discuss and propose new feature requests.
-An opportunity to connect with fellow Power Grid Model enthusiasts and users.
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERP
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...Edge AI and Vision Alliance
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the irresponsible use of machine intelligence in May 2024
OpenID AuthZEN Interop Read Out - Authorization
During Identiverse 2024 and EIC 2024, members of the OpenID AuthZEN WG got together and demoed their authorization endpoints conforming to the AuthZEN API
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
Acuity is an innovative learning app designed to transform the way you engage with knowledge. Powered by AI technology, Acuity takes complex topics and distills them into concise, interactive summaries that are easy to read & understand. Whether you're exploring the depths of quantum mechanics or seeking insight into historical events, Acuity provides the key information you need without the burden of lengthy texts.
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
A Mix Chart displays historical data of numbers in a graphical or tabular form. The Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart specifically shows the results of a sequence of numbers over different periods.
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
During this demo, the founders of Secludy will demonstrate how their system utilizes Milvus to store and manipulate embeddings for generating privacy-protected synthetic data. Their approach not only maintains the confidentiality of the original data but also enhances the utility and scalability of LLMs under privacy constraints. Attendees, including machine learning engineers, data scientists, and data managers, will witness first-hand how Secludy's integration with Milvus empowers organizations to harness the power of LLMs securely and efficiently.
Recently uploaded (20)
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERP
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERP
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Brain ppt
- 2. Dr. Lawrence A. Farewell Presented by Sivanandam
- 18. by