Brain Fingerprinting is scientific technique to determine whether or not specific information is stored in an individual's brain.
Ruled Admissible in one US Court as scientific evidence.
It has a record of 100% Accuracy.
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do being truthful. Issue related to the use of such evidence in courtsare discussed.The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court. In the field of criminology a new lie detector has been developed in USA. This is called “BRAIN FINGERPRINTING”.The invention is supposed to be the best lie detector even smooth criminals who paas the polygraph Test with ease.The new method employs brainwaves ,which are useful in detecting whether the person is subjected to test remember finer details of crime,even if the person willingly suppressesthe necessary information,the brain wave is sure to trap him ,according to the experts who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Brain fingerprinting by ankit 2017............ankitg29
information about the brain fingerprinting technology . by EEG method by neuron firing and impulse of brain wave.P300 mean is 300-1000 m-sec brain wave, is better tech. than the polygraph test and other than than PET test. is basically depand the brain wave. is not the depand on the emotions and the pulse rate
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do being truthful. Issue related to the use of such evidence in courtsare discussed.The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court. In the field of criminology a new lie detector has been developed in USA. This is called “BRAIN FINGERPRINTING”.The invention is supposed to be the best lie detector even smooth criminals who paas the polygraph Test with ease.The new method employs brainwaves ,which are useful in detecting whether the person is subjected to test remember finer details of crime,even if the person willingly suppressesthe necessary information,the brain wave is sure to trap him ,according to the experts who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Brain fingerprinting by ankit 2017............ankitg29
information about the brain fingerprinting technology . by EEG method by neuron firing and impulse of brain wave.P300 mean is 300-1000 m-sec brain wave, is better tech. than the polygraph test and other than than PET test. is basically depand the brain wave. is not the depand on the emotions and the pulse rate
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial forensic science technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It does this by measuring electrical brainwave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen (Farwell & Smith 2001, Farwell, Richardson, and Richardson 2012).
Most efficient slides on Brain Fingerprinting are listed here.
This is a technology which is most useful for forensic science.
A seminar based presentation is listed here
For any more details contact me-
0091-8943307844
or
nibelmd@gmail.com
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes.
Mobile forensics is a branch of digital forensics. Simply, it is a science of recovering different kinds of evidence from mobile phones. It helps investigators significantly to reach to the criminal.
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial forensic science technique that uses electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether specific information is stored in a subject's brain. It does this by measuring electrical brainwave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen (Farwell & Smith 2001, Farwell, Richardson, and Richardson 2012).
Most efficient slides on Brain Fingerprinting are listed here.
This is a technology which is most useful for forensic science.
A seminar based presentation is listed here
For any more details contact me-
0091-8943307844
or
nibelmd@gmail.com
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes.
Mobile forensics is a branch of digital forensics. Simply, it is a science of recovering different kinds of evidence from mobile phones. It helps investigators significantly to reach to the criminal.
These are slides for an introductory lecture on fMRI/MRI and analysis of fMRI data. The corresponding tutorial is available on my website kathiseidlrathkopf.com
Brain Fingerprinting is a technique used to determine scientifically what information is, or is not stored in a particular brain.
Brain Finger Printing was invented by Dr B .S. Farwell chief scientist and president of human brain research and laboratory , USA
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes.
Abstract:
Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court.
In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
Introduction:
Brain Fingerprinting is a controversial proposed investigative technique that measures recognition of familiar stimuli by measuring electrical brain wave responses to words, phrases, or pictures that are presented on a computer screen. Brain fingerprinting was invented by Lawrence Farwell. The theory is that the suspect's reaction to the details of an event or activity will reflect if the suspect had prior knowledge of the event or activity. This test uses what Farwell calls the MERMER ("Memory and Encoding Related Multifaceted Electroencephalographic Response") response to detect familiarity reaction. One of the applications is lie detection. Dr. Lawrence A. Farwell has invented, developed, proven, and patented the technique of Farwell Brain Fingerprinting, a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including actual crimes..
Brain Fingerprinting is a new computer-based technology to identify the perpetrator of a crime accurately and scientifically by measuring brain-wave responses to crime-relevant words or pictures presented on a computer screen. Brain Fingerprinting has proven 100% accurate in over 120 tests, including tests on FBI agents, tests for a US intelligence agency and for the US Navy, and tests on real-life situations including felony crimes. Brain fingerprinting is based on finding that the brain generates a unique brain wave pattern when a person encounters a familiar stimulus Use of functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection derives from studies suggesting that persons asked to lie show different patterns of brain activity than they do when being truthful. Issues related to the use of such evidence in courts are discussed. The author concludes that neither approach is currently supported by enough data regarding its accuracy in detecting deception to warrant use in court. In the field of criminology, a new lie detector has been developed in the United States of America. This is called “brain fingerprinting”. This invention is supposed to be the best lie detector available as on date and is said to detect even smooth criminals who pass the polygraph test (the conventional lie detector test) with ease. The new method employs brain waves, which are useful in detecting whether the person subjected to the test, remembers finer details of the crime. Even if the person willingly suppresses the necessary information, the brain wave is sure to trap him, according to the experts, who are very excited about the new kid on the block.
REVIEW: Previous Deception detection methods and New proposed method using in...IJERA Editor
Deception detection has important legal and medical applications, but the reliability of methods for the differentiation between truthful and deceptive responses is still limited. Deception detection can be more accurately achieved by measuring the brain correlates of lying in an individual. For the evaluation of the method, several participants were gone through the designed concealed information test paradigm and their respective brain signals were recorded. The electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were recorded and separated into many single trials. To enhance signal noise ratio (SNR) of P3 components, the independent component analysis (ICA) method was adopted to separate non-P3 (i.e. artifacts) and P3 components from every single trial. Then the P3 waveforms with high SNR were reconstructed. And then group of features based on time, frequency, and amplitude were extracted from the reconstructed P3 waveforms. Finally, two different class of feature samples were used to train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier because it has higher performance compared with several other classifiers. The method presented in this paper improves the efficiency of CIT and deception detection in comparison with previous reported methods.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
2. Contents
1. Introduction
2. Quick overview of technique
3. Main Technique behind Brain Fingerprinting
4. Features
5. Instruments Required
6. Analysis Procedure
7. Different phases of Brain Fingerprinting
8. Applications in various fields
9. Advantages & disadvantages
10. Conclusion & future work
11. References
3. What is Brain Fingerprinting?
Brain Fingerprinting is
scientific technique to
determine whether or not
specific information is
stored in an individual's
brain.
4. Quick Overview
Invented By Dr Lawrence A. Farwell.
It’s a patented technique of proven accuracy in US government
tests.
Ruled Admissible in one US Court as scientific evidence.
It has a record of 100% Accuracy.
5. Technique
When a person is exposed to a
rare, but meaningful
information, there is increase
in neuron activity which
results in an increase in
voltage, typically within 300–
1000 msec after the stimulus,
and that response with
increasing voltage is known as
P300.
6. The discovery of the P300-MERMER
In the initial brain fingerprinting research, Farwell and Donchin used
the P300 event-related brain potential (Farwell and Donchin 1986;
1988b; 1991; Farwell 1992a). Later Farwell discovered that the
P300 can be considered to be part of a larger response he called a
memory and encoding related multifaceted electroencephalographic
response or P300-MERMER
7. This pattern occurs within less than
a second after the stimulus
presentation, and can be readily
detected using appropriate amplifiers
and a computerized signal-detection
algorithm.
The person to be tested wears a
special headband with electronic
sensors that measure the responses
from several locations on the scalp.
In order to calibrate the brain
fingerprinting system, the testee is
presented with a series of irrelevant
stimuli, words, and pictures, and a
series of relevant stimuli, words, and
pictures.
8. The test subject's brain response to these two different types
of stimuli allow the testor to determine if the measured brain
responses to test stimuli, called probes, are more similar to the
relevant or irrelevant responses.
The entire Brain Fingerprinting system is under computer
control, including presentation of the stimuli, recording of
electrical brain activity, a mathematical data analysis
algorithm that compares the responses to the three types of
stimuli and produces a determination of "information absent"
or "information present.
9. No questions are asked and no answers are given during Farwell
Brain Fingerprinting.
Brain Fingerprinting technology depends only on brain
information processing, it does not depend on the emotional
response of the subject.
10. Instrumental requirements:
• Personal Computer
• A Data acquisition board
• A Graphics Card for driving two monitors from one PC
• A four-channel EEG amplifier system.
• Software developed by the Brain Fingerprinting laboratories for
the data acquisition and analysis.
11. Analysis procedure
When brain fingerprinting test is done on any suspect then this type of
graph appears on the analyzer screen, by seeing these waves is comes to
the conclusion that whether the information is present in the person
mind or not. This graph shows three lines red, blue and green. Red line
indicates the information that suspect is expected to know. Green line
shows information that is not known to the suspect and the blue line
indicated the information of the crime that only suspect would know. In
this graph green line and the blue line are closely correlate with each
other that means the related information is not present in the suspect
brain. Information is not present in figure of not guilty.
12.
13. Four phases of Farwell brain fingerprinting
Farwell Brain fingerprinting works similarly, except that the
evidence collected both at the crime scene and on the person of the
suspect (that is, in the brain as revealed by electrical brain
responses) is informational evidence rather than physical evidence.
There are four stages to Farwell brain fingerprinting, which are
similar to the steps in fingerprinting and DNA fingerprinting:
1. Brain fingerprinting crime scene evidence collection.
2. Brain fingerprinting brain evidence collection.
3. Brain fingerprinting computer evidence analysis.
4. Brain fingerprinting scientific result.
14. Brain fingerprinting can be used to make life easier and can aid
mankind in many ways. Key fields where brain fingerprinting can
be used are:
15. Advertising
What specific information do people retain from
advertising?
What specific elements in an ad campaign have the most
impact?
How effective is the product branding strategy?
16. Medical Applications
With early diagnosis, the progression
of Alzheimer's symptoms can often be
delayed through medications and
dietary and lifestyle changes.
Pharmaceutical companies will be
able to determine more quickly the
effects of their new medications.
17. Counter terrorism
Aid in determining who has participated in terrorist acts, directly
or indirectly.
Help to identify people who have knowledge or training in
banking, finance or communications and who are associated with
terrorist teams and acts.
Identify criminals quickly and scientifically.
Reduces evasion of justice.
18.
19. Advantages
1) The record stored in the brain of the perpetrator is often a rich source of
information that can be connected to the crime scene. Except in rare
cases where the crime has been recorded on video, the record stored in
the brain is generally the most comprehensive available record of the
crime, even though it is not perfect.
2) Identify criminals quickly and scientifically.
3) Record of 100% accuracy.
4) Identify terrorists and members of gangs, criminal and intelligence
organizations.
5) Reduce expenditure of money and other resources in law enforcement.
6) Reduce evasion of justice.
7) Access criminal evidence in the brain.
8) Human Rights Oriented.
20. Disadvantages
1) It detects information processing brain responses that reveal what
information is stored in the subjects brain. It does not detect how that
information got there, be it a witness or a perpetrator.
2) It detects only information, and not intent. The fact that the suspect
knows the uncontested facts of the circumstance does not tell us which
part of the intent is correct.
3) It is not applicable for general screening,
4) It does not detect lies. It simply detects information.
5) In the probe stimuli. Like all forensic science techniques, brain
fingerprinting depends on the evidence-gathering process which lies
outside the realm of science to provide the evidence to be scientifically
tested.
6) It’s not a substitute for effective investigation on the part of the
investigator or for common sense and good judgment on the part of the
judge and jury.
21. Conclusion and future scope
Brain Fingerprinting is a revolutionary new scientific technology for
solving crimes, identifying perpetrators, and exonerating innocent
suspects, with a record of 100% accuracy in research with US
government agencies, actual criminal cases, and other applications. The
technology investigators fulfill an urgent need for governments, law
enforcement agencies, corporations, crime victims, and falsely accused
innocent suspects.
22. References
1. Ashwini v. Sharma ,dr. Ganesh s. Sable,(2013) “brain
fingerprinting” , Journal of information, knowledge and research in
electronics and communication,ISSN: 0975 – 6779, volume – 02,
issue - 02
2. Allen, JJ, Mertens, R(2009) “Limitations to the detection of
deception: true and false recollection are poorly distinguished using
an eventrelated potential procedure”, Social Neuroscience 4(6),
473-90.
3. Basar-Eroglu C, Basar E, Demiralp T, Schumann M (1992) “P300-
response: possible psychophysiological correlates in delta and theta
frequency channels”, A review International Journal of
Psychophysiology, 13, 2, 161-79.
4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579, 594
(1993).
5. Farwell LA and Smith SS. Using Brain MERMER Testing To
Detect Concealed Knowledge Despite Efforts Referenv
In this graph since blue and red lines which indicated
that the information is expected to know by the
suspect and the information that only the suspect
would know are correlated with each other that
shows the information is present in the suspect brain.
This is how analyzes is done in brain fingerprinting.
The whole procedure of brain fingerprinting consists
of four phases.
In fingerprinting and DNA fingerprinting, evidence is
recognized and collected at the crime scene, and
preserved properly until a suspect is apprehended, is
scientifically compared with evidence on the person
of the suspect to detect a match that would place the
suspect at the crime scene.
1.The primary advantage of brain fingerprinting is that in most crimes very few such features can be found. In some crimes none are available.
9. Fingerprints and DNA, though accurate and highly useful, can only be collected in approximately 1% of all criminal cases brain is always there.