SlideShare a Scribd company logo
BCG Matrix & GE Matrix
BCG MATRIX
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix is developed by BRUCE
HENDERSON of the BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP in the early 1970’s.
According to this technique, businesses or products are classified as low
or high performers depending upon their market growth rate and
relative market share
STARS
 Stars are leaders in business.
 May not necessarily produce highest cash flow.
 They also require heavy investment, to maintain its large market share.
 It leads to large amount of cash consumption and cash generation.
 Attempts should be made to hold the market share otherwise the star
will become a Question Mark.
 They are foundation of the company
and often the stars of yesterday.
 They generate more cash than
required.
 They extract the profits by investing
as little cash as possible.
 Enjoys economy of scale and high
profit margins being the market
leader.
 They are located in an industry that
is mature, not growing or declining.
CASH COWS
DOGS
 Dogs are the cash traps.
 Dogs do not have potential to bring in much cash.
 Number of dogs in the company should be minimized.
 Business is situated at a declining stage
QUESTION MARK
 Most businesses start of as question
marks.
 They will absorb great amounts of cash
if the market share remains unchanged,
(low).
 Question marks have potential to
become star and eventually cash cow
but can also become a dog.
 Investments should be high for
question marks
GE Matrix
In the late sixties and early seventies, while the Boston Consulting Group were devising the BCG
or Growth Share matrix, General Electric, a leading corporation in the United States, were also
looking at concepts and techniques for strategic planning.
The firm was disappointed in the profits that they had made from their investments in the
various businesses, which suggested flaws in GE’s approach to investment decision-making.
GE asked McKinsey and Company, a consulting company in the USA, to develop a portfolio
approach with a wider dimension than the BCG matrix.
In 1971 McKinsey and Co developed the business screen for General Electric to differentiate the
potential for future profit in each of the 43 strategic business units.
Starting point of GE Matrix
Firstly, MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS replaces MARKET GROWTH
as the dimension of
industry attractiveness, and includes a broader range of factors other than just the market
growth rate.
Secondly, COMPETITIVE STRENGTH replaces MARKET SHARE
as the
dimension by which the competitive position of each business unit is assessed.
GE OVER BCG
In the original GE McKinsey matrix,
business strength is plotted on the
vertical axis; the industry
attractiveness on the horizontal axis
and the size of the circle represents
the size of the industry with a
shaded wedge representing the
firm’s current share of the industry.
The matrix is divided into nine boxes.
- Market Size
- Market growth
- Market profitability
- Pricing trends
- Competitive intensity / rivalry
- Overall risk of returns in the industry
- Opportunity to differentiate products and services
- Segmentation
- Distribution structure (e.g. retail, direct, wholesale
Factors that Affect Market
Attractiveness
- Strength of assets and competencies
- Relative brand strength
- Market share
- Customer loyalty
- Relative cost position (cost structure
compared with competitors)
- Distribution strength
- Record of technological or other innovation
- Access to financial and other investment
resources
Factors that Affect Competitive
Strength
The factors are usually identified by
a representative, experienced
group of managers from the firm
including corporate, business and
functional managers.
Who Defines the Factors?
1. The three cells at the top left hand
side of the matrix are the most
attractive in which to operate and
require a policy of investment for
growth – these are usually colored
green.
2. The  three  cells  running  diagonally 
from  left  to  right  have  a  medium 
attractiveness,  are  colored  yellow  and 
the  management  of  businesses  within 
this  category  should  be  more  cautious 
and  with  a  greater  emphasis  being 
placed  on  selective  investment  and 
earning retention.
3. The  three  cells  at  the  bottom  right 
hand  side  are  the  least  attractive, 
therefore  colored  red  and  management 
should follow a policy of harvesting and / 
or divesting unless the relative strengths 
can be improved.
•  If an organization is made up of many 
business units or if a business unit is 
made up of a number of different 
product lines.     
•  Important for assigning priorities for 
investment in the various businesses of 
the firm and is guidance for resource 
allocation. 
•  This matrix can be used at all levels 
within the organization. 
•   It allows an organization to focus on 
the strengths and weaknesses of the 
business units or products.
Best Use

More Related Content

What's hot

Modern finance theory ppt@ mba
Modern finance theory ppt@ mbaModern finance theory ppt@ mba
Modern finance theory ppt@ mba
Babasab Patil
 
GE Matrix and explanation
GE Matrix and explanation GE Matrix and explanation
GE Matrix and explanation
VIshnu Pr
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
Ajilal
 
Mergers & acquisitions
Mergers & acquisitionsMergers & acquisitions
Mergers & acquisitions
Babasab Patil
 
BCG Matrix PPT
BCG Matrix PPTBCG Matrix PPT
BCG Matrix PPT
MyAssignmenthelp.com
 
Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)
Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)
Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)
Loi Wai Yee
 
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Analysis Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Himani Sabharwal
 
theories merger
 theories merger theories merger
theories merger
Roja M V
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
Rakesh Malpedi
 
Ge9 final ppt
Ge9 final pptGe9 final ppt
Ge9 final ppt
Ravin Gandhi
 
Portfolio analysis and case study of Tata group
Portfolio analysis and case study of Tata groupPortfolio analysis and case study of Tata group
Portfolio analysis and case study of Tata group
AnjanaS27
 
BCG matrix
BCG matrixBCG matrix
BCG matrix
Sheetal Wagh
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
sabin kafle
 
Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions
Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions�Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions�
Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions
Firdaus Fitri Zainal Abidin
 
BCG Matrix
BCG MatrixBCG Matrix
BCG Matrix
Megha Anilkumar
 
6. portfolio revision
6. portfolio revision6. portfolio revision
6. portfolio revisionAkash Bakshi
 
Information about BCG Matrix
Information about BCG Matrix Information about BCG Matrix
Information about BCG Matrix Bajajpankaj
 
Presentation of defensive strategies
Presentation of defensive strategiesPresentation of defensive strategies
Presentation of defensive strategies
umair habib
 

What's hot (20)

Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
 
Modern finance theory ppt@ mba
Modern finance theory ppt@ mbaModern finance theory ppt@ mba
Modern finance theory ppt@ mba
 
GE Matrix and explanation
GE Matrix and explanation GE Matrix and explanation
GE Matrix and explanation
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
 
PPT ON BCG Matrix
PPT ON BCG MatrixPPT ON BCG Matrix
PPT ON BCG Matrix
 
Mergers & acquisitions
Mergers & acquisitionsMergers & acquisitions
Mergers & acquisitions
 
BCG Matrix PPT
BCG Matrix PPTBCG Matrix PPT
BCG Matrix PPT
 
Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)
Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)
Bcg matrix (Strategy formulation)
 
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Analysis Portfolio Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
 
theories merger
 theories merger theories merger
theories merger
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
 
Ge9 final ppt
Ge9 final pptGe9 final ppt
Ge9 final ppt
 
Portfolio analysis and case study of Tata group
Portfolio analysis and case study of Tata groupPortfolio analysis and case study of Tata group
Portfolio analysis and case study of Tata group
 
BCG matrix
BCG matrixBCG matrix
BCG matrix
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
 
Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions
Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions�Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions�
Ch.11 Creating Value through Mergers and Acquisitions
 
BCG Matrix
BCG MatrixBCG Matrix
BCG Matrix
 
6. portfolio revision
6. portfolio revision6. portfolio revision
6. portfolio revision
 
Information about BCG Matrix
Information about BCG Matrix Information about BCG Matrix
Information about BCG Matrix
 
Presentation of defensive strategies
Presentation of defensive strategiesPresentation of defensive strategies
Presentation of defensive strategies
 

Similar to BCG GE Matrix - Strategic Management

Marketing Stategy
Marketing StategyMarketing Stategy
Marketing Stategyajithsrc
 
Strategy
StrategyStrategy
Strategy
ajithsrc
 
EXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK
EXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNKEXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK
EXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK
TanishaSaraf1
 
Tools of Mergers and Acquisitions.pdf
Tools of  Mergers and Acquisitions.pdfTools of  Mergers and Acquisitions.pdf
Tools of Mergers and Acquisitions.pdf
MaithriPRao
 
BCG matrix
BCG matrixBCG matrix
BCG matrix
Rahul Srivastav
 
Ge nine(9) cell matrix
Ge nine(9) cell matrixGe nine(9) cell matrix
Ge nine(9) cell matrix
Hpm India
 
BCG matrix(word)
BCG matrix(word)BCG matrix(word)
BCG matrix(word)
Rahul Srivastav
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
wanthay
 
bcg matrix.pptx
bcg matrix.pptxbcg matrix.pptx
bcg matrix.pptx
AaronFlowers3
 
BCG & GE Models.ppt
BCG & GE Models.pptBCG & GE Models.ppt
BCG & GE Models.ppt
015HARISRIAZ
 
Bcg powerpoint mba
Bcg powerpoint mbaBcg powerpoint mba
Bcg powerpoint mba
wldunks
 
Bcg and spotlight matrix
Bcg and spotlight matrixBcg and spotlight matrix
Bcg and spotlight matrixAditi Sharma
 
BCG
BCGBCG
BCG matrix.pdf
BCG matrix.pdfBCG matrix.pdf
BCG matrix.pdf
ArunVidyaK
 

Similar to BCG GE Matrix - Strategic Management (20)

Bcg, ge & ansoff
Bcg, ge & ansoffBcg, ge & ansoff
Bcg, ge & ansoff
 
Marketing Stategy
Marketing StategyMarketing Stategy
Marketing Stategy
 
Strategy
StrategyStrategy
Strategy
 
BCG MATRIX.ppt
BCG MATRIX.pptBCG MATRIX.ppt
BCG MATRIX.ppt
 
EXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK
EXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNKEXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK
EXPANSION STRATEGIES JNJXNNNNNNNNNNNNNNK
 
BCG Matrix- Sem Shaikh
BCG Matrix- Sem ShaikhBCG Matrix- Sem Shaikh
BCG Matrix- Sem Shaikh
 
Tools of Mergers and Acquisitions.pdf
Tools of  Mergers and Acquisitions.pdfTools of  Mergers and Acquisitions.pdf
Tools of Mergers and Acquisitions.pdf
 
BCG matrix
BCG matrixBCG matrix
BCG matrix
 
Ge nine(9) cell matrix
Ge nine(9) cell matrixGe nine(9) cell matrix
Ge nine(9) cell matrix
 
BCG matrix(word)
BCG matrix(word)BCG matrix(word)
BCG matrix(word)
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
 
bcg matrix.pptx
bcg matrix.pptxbcg matrix.pptx
bcg matrix.pptx
 
Bcg matrix
Bcg matrixBcg matrix
Bcg matrix
 
BCG & GE Models.ppt
BCG & GE Models.pptBCG & GE Models.ppt
BCG & GE Models.ppt
 
Bcg powerpoint mba
Bcg powerpoint mbaBcg powerpoint mba
Bcg powerpoint mba
 
Bcg mtrix
Bcg mtrixBcg mtrix
Bcg mtrix
 
Gen matrix
Gen matrixGen matrix
Gen matrix
 
Bcg and spotlight matrix
Bcg and spotlight matrixBcg and spotlight matrix
Bcg and spotlight matrix
 
BCG
BCGBCG
BCG
 
BCG matrix.pdf
BCG matrix.pdfBCG matrix.pdf
BCG matrix.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptxMARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
bennyroshan06
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
GeoBlogs
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
Jisc
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
PedroFerreira53928
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Atul Kumar Singh
 
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa Przedsiębiorczego
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Jisc
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ashokrao Mane college of Pharmacy Peth-Vadgaon
 

Recently uploaded (20)

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptxMARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.Language Across the  Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
Language Across the Curriculm LAC B.Ed.
 
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdfESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
ESC Beyond Borders _From EU to You_ InfoPack general.pdf
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology ......
 

BCG GE Matrix - Strategic Management

  • 1. BCG Matrix & GE Matrix
  • 2. BCG MATRIX Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix is developed by BRUCE HENDERSON of the BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP in the early 1970’s. According to this technique, businesses or products are classified as low or high performers depending upon their market growth rate and relative market share
  • 3.
  • 4. STARS  Stars are leaders in business.  May not necessarily produce highest cash flow.  They also require heavy investment, to maintain its large market share.  It leads to large amount of cash consumption and cash generation.  Attempts should be made to hold the market share otherwise the star will become a Question Mark.
  • 5.  They are foundation of the company and often the stars of yesterday.  They generate more cash than required.  They extract the profits by investing as little cash as possible.  Enjoys economy of scale and high profit margins being the market leader.  They are located in an industry that is mature, not growing or declining. CASH COWS
  • 6. DOGS  Dogs are the cash traps.  Dogs do not have potential to bring in much cash.  Number of dogs in the company should be minimized.  Business is situated at a declining stage
  • 7. QUESTION MARK  Most businesses start of as question marks.  They will absorb great amounts of cash if the market share remains unchanged, (low).  Question marks have potential to become star and eventually cash cow but can also become a dog.  Investments should be high for question marks
  • 9. In the late sixties and early seventies, while the Boston Consulting Group were devising the BCG or Growth Share matrix, General Electric, a leading corporation in the United States, were also looking at concepts and techniques for strategic planning. The firm was disappointed in the profits that they had made from their investments in the various businesses, which suggested flaws in GE’s approach to investment decision-making. GE asked McKinsey and Company, a consulting company in the USA, to develop a portfolio approach with a wider dimension than the BCG matrix. In 1971 McKinsey and Co developed the business screen for General Electric to differentiate the potential for future profit in each of the 43 strategic business units. Starting point of GE Matrix
  • 10. Firstly, MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS replaces MARKET GROWTH as the dimension of industry attractiveness, and includes a broader range of factors other than just the market growth rate. Secondly, COMPETITIVE STRENGTH replaces MARKET SHARE as the dimension by which the competitive position of each business unit is assessed. GE OVER BCG
  • 11. In the original GE McKinsey matrix, business strength is plotted on the vertical axis; the industry attractiveness on the horizontal axis and the size of the circle represents the size of the industry with a shaded wedge representing the firm’s current share of the industry. The matrix is divided into nine boxes.
  • 12. - Market Size - Market growth - Market profitability - Pricing trends - Competitive intensity / rivalry - Overall risk of returns in the industry - Opportunity to differentiate products and services - Segmentation - Distribution structure (e.g. retail, direct, wholesale Factors that Affect Market Attractiveness
  • 13. - Strength of assets and competencies - Relative brand strength - Market share - Customer loyalty - Relative cost position (cost structure compared with competitors) - Distribution strength - Record of technological or other innovation - Access to financial and other investment resources Factors that Affect Competitive Strength
  • 14. The factors are usually identified by a representative, experienced group of managers from the firm including corporate, business and functional managers. Who Defines the Factors?
  • 15. 1. The three cells at the top left hand side of the matrix are the most attractive in which to operate and require a policy of investment for growth – these are usually colored green.
  • 16. 2. The  three  cells  running  diagonally  from  left  to  right  have  a  medium  attractiveness,  are  colored  yellow  and  the  management  of  businesses  within  this  category  should  be  more  cautious  and  with  a  greater  emphasis  being  placed  on  selective  investment  and  earning retention.
  • 17. 3. The  three  cells  at  the  bottom  right  hand  side  are  the  least  attractive,  therefore  colored  red  and  management  should follow a policy of harvesting and /  or divesting unless the relative strengths  can be improved.

Editor's Notes

  1. Brief History In the late sixties and early seventies, while the Boston Consulting Group were devising the BCG or Growth Share matrix, General Electric, a leading corporation in the United States, were also looking at concepts and techniques for strategic planning. The firm was disappointed in the profits that they had made from their investments in the various businesses, which suggested flaws in GE’s approach to investment decision-making. They became interested in the Growth-Share matrix and liked the visual approach depicting the positioning of a firm’s businesses on the matrix. General Electric, from all their own strategic planning research, objected to the two dimensional matrix which relied on market growth for industry attractiveness and relative market share for business strength
  2. Summary   The matrix was developed by General Electric and their consultants McKinsey and Company to differentiate the potential for future profit in each of the 43 strategic business units and therefore to differentiate resources allocation priorities.   It was developed in response to the limitations seen in the Boston Consulting Group’s matrix –the Growth Share Matrix. It is a more flexible approach to portfolio planning.   The axes of the matrix measure industry attractiveness on the x-axis and business strength on the y-axis. The size of the circles represents the size of the industry with a wedge representing the firm’s current share of the industry.   The scope of application for this model extends from a corporate level to a business level incorporating the products making up the business.   The matrix consists of nine boxes allowing the rating of the factors to be high, medium, low compared to the BCG’s low and high ratings.   The model proposes that the profitability of each unit is influenced by the unit’s business strength and that the ability and incentive of a firm to maintain or improve its position in a market depends on the industry attractiveness.   A highly attractive market implies high present or potential cash flow and similarly high business strength also implies high present or future cash flow.   This model ascertains that industry attractiveness and business strengths are made up of any number of varying factors and that these factors may differ from organisation to organisation.   Factors on both axes are weighted and rated to give the co-ordinates on the plot   The matrix is divided into three general areas of invest / grow, selectivity / maintain, milk / divest.   Forecasting of these factors into the future and plotting the businesses on the matrix assists with the strategic planning of a firm.   The matrix has been criticised as being too complicated and paying too little attention to the business environment. This second criticism led to the development of the Environmental Strategy Matrix.   Other models that can be considered as versions or adaptations of the original GE McKinsey matrix are the Shell directional policy matrix and McDonald’s directional policy matrix.
  3. The factors are usually identified by a representative, experienced group of managers from the firm including corporate, business and functional managers. An explicit understanding of what constitutes a potentially profitable environment is essential to the formulation of strategy and for the understanding of the potential impact of competitors. A market or industry is considered to be attractive if its potential for providing a significant contribution to objectives for earnings growth and return on investment is judged to be high.
  4.  Grow / Penetrate – These businesses are a target for investment, they have strong business strengths, are in attractive markets and they should therefore have high returns on investment and competitive advantage. They should receive financial and managerial support to maintain their strong position and to continue contributing to long-term profitability. ATK – Seek dominanceGrowMaximise investment   Invest for Growth – Businesses here are in very attractive industries but have average business strength. They should be invested in to improve their long-term competitive position. ATK – Evaluate potential for leadership via segmentationIdentify weaknessesBuild strengths   Selective Investment or Divestment - These businesses are in very attractive markets but their business strength is weak. Investment must be aimed at improving the business strengths. These businesses will probably have to be funded by other businesses in the group as they are not self-funding. Only businesses that can improve their strengths should be retained – if not they should be divested. ATK – SpecialiseSeek nichesConsider acquisitions   Selective Harvest or Investment – Businesses in this box have good business strength in an industry that is losing its attractiveness. They should be supported if necessary but they may be self-supporting in cash flow terms. Selective harvesting is an option to extract cash flow but this should be done with caution so as not to run down the business prematurely. ATK – Identify growth segmentsInvest stronglyMaintain position elsewhere   Segment and Selective Investment – Businesses with average business strengths and in average industries can improve their positions by creative segmentation to create profitable segments and by selective investment to support the segmentation strategy. The business needs to create superior returns by concentrating on building segment barriers to differentiate themselves. ATK – Identify growth segmentsSpecialiseInvest selectively   Controlled Exit or Harvest – Businesses with weak business strengths in moderately attractive industries are candidates for a controlled exit or divestment. Attempts to gain market share by increasing business strengths could prove to be very expensive and must be done with caution ATK – SpecialiseSeek nichesConsider exit   Harvest for Cash Generation – Strong businesses in unattractive markets should be net cash generators and could provide funds for use throughout the rest of the portfolio. Investment should be aimed at keeping these businesses in a dominant position of strength but over investment can be disastrous especially in a mature market. Be aware of competitors trying to revitalise mature industries ATK – Maintain overall positionSeek cash flowInvest at maintenance level   Controlled Harvest – They have average business strengths in an unattractive market and the strategy should be to harvest the business in a controlled way to prevent a defeat or the business could be used to upset a competitor. ATK – Prune linesMinimise investmentPosition to divest   Rapid Exit or Attack Business – These businesses have neither strengths nor an attractive industry and should be exited. Investments made should only be done to fund the exit. ATK – Trust leaders statesmanshipGo after competitors cash generatorsTime exit and divest
  5. Use of the GE McKinsey matrix is recommended if an organisation is made up of many business units or if a business unit is made up of a number of different product lines. General Electric used this matrix at five different levels in the organisation: product, product line, market segment, SBU, business sector.   The GE McKinsey matrix is important for assigning priorities for investment in the various businesses of the firm and is guidance for resource allocation. (Hax & Majluf 1983) Investment is assigned according to the generic strategies laid out above but generally is given to businesses who show strength in an attractive market.   This matrix can be used at all levels within the organisation. At the corporate level, the portfolio of businesses making up the firm can be analysed on the matrix, at the business unit level, the products making up the business’s portfolio can be mapped out onto the matrix   This matrix allows one to set a strategy for the future after mapping the portfolio in the present and forecasting the future positions by assessing the factors constituting the business strengths. It allows an organisation to focus on the strengths and weaknesses of the business units or products.