5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
A Holistic Approach Towards International Disaster Resilient Architecture by ...
BAAS Mainstreaming DRR in AG IDRC 2014
1. Mainstreaming DRR in Agriculture:
Assessment of progress made against the HFA
5th IDRC
24-28 August 2014
GRF Davos
2. OBJECTIVE AND FOCUS OF THE STUDY
Understand the role and impacts of the Hyogo Framework for
Action (HFA) on the process of mainstreaming Disaster Risk
Reduction (DRR) in agriculture
Contribute to the objectives of the GAR15: determine to what degree the HFA
has been fit-for-purpose in the AG sector: Review progress in AG sector
related to HFA, Priority for Action 1
In-depth analysis to gain insights on DRR mainstreaming in AG
DRR priorities found in the sector
DRR measures adopted across the 5 HFA PFA
Potential drivers of change in mainstreaming
Trends in timeline of progress made since 2005.
Extent to which DRR has been implemented in practice
3. METHODOLOGY
Review in 30 countries of
National agricultural development strategies/plans
DRR strategies/plans specific to the agriculture sector
National DRR strategies /plans
National post-disaster recovery strategies
National HFA progress reports
Complemented by Observation based FAO field experiences
Case studies highlighting examples of good DRR practices
applied within the AG sector
4. FINDINGS: DRR IN AG DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
Progress in addressing DRR in AG development planning:
nearly 50% of the sector plans make reference to DRR
Big variation in DRR contents and visibility ranging from
priority level (Bangladesh, Nepal, Philippines, South Africa,
Tanzania) to activity level (Chad, Mali, Guinea, Haiti, Sierra
Leone).
Limited attention in AG development plans to HFA priorities
1 and 3; higher priorities attached to priorities 2, 4 and 5.
The HFA lacks guidance on how the 5 priorities apply to
sectors or what objectives they should strive for.
5. DRR IN AG DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
HFA Priority for Action Countries No. of
countries
1: Make Disaster Risk
Reduction a Priority
Bangladesh, Benin, Nepal, South Africa, Tanzania 5
2: Know the Risks and
Take Action
Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Cambodia, DRC,
Guatemala, Mozambique, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Philippines,
South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda
17
3: Build Understanding
and Awareness
Bangladesh, Tanzania 2
4: Reduce Underlying Risk
Factors
Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Cambodia,
Ethiopia, Eritrea, Lao PDR, Mali, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru,
Philippines, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda
18
5: Be Prepared and Ready
to Act
Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Cambodia, DRC, Ethiopia,
Guatemala, Lao PDR, Liberia, Madagascar, Mozambique, Nepal,
Nicaragua, Philippines, Sudan, Tanzania
17
6. DRR IN AG DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
HFA Priority for
Action
Examples of DRR measures in AG development plans reviewed
1. Make Disaster
Risk Reduction a
Priority
Set-up institutional system for disaster risk management and preparedness
Introduction of DRM in agriculture and rural development planning activities
Agricultural CB action plans/programs for risk reduction
Disaster management plans at district level
2. Know the
Risks and Take
Action
Food security monitoring , Food and nutrition surveillance system
Market price information system to manage response and price stabilization
EWS for livestock including pastoral areas
Monitoring of plant pests and diseases
3. Build
Understanding
and Awareness
Train staff on agricultural DRR, preparedness, EWSs and post-disaster activities
Development of awareness programs
Institutional capacity for DRM and preparedness
4. Reduce
Underlying Risk
Factors
Sustainable cropping patterns and systems adapted to local conditions
Integrated pest management
Resource and water conservation and management practices and technologies
Research on drought resistant pasture and forage for animals in pastoral areas
5. Be Prepared
and Ready to Act
Mechanisms and guidelines for responding to food emergencies
Upgrade the current national food reserve infrastructure
Improve access to crop and livestock insurance
7. FINDINGS: MAINSTREAMING DRR IN AGRICULTURE
Limited progress: the enabling environment required to
successfully mainstream DRR into the sector is still largely
undeveloped in most countries:
Limited internal capacity within line ministries; DRR not specified as
specific theme/objective
No sector budget allocations to DRR
Lack of coordination mechanisms to drive sector specific policy and
planning for DRR
HFA has focused on establishing overall legislations, policies,
platforms and budgets for DRR; need for same enabling
environments for DRR in sectors was not yet addressed.
Sector-specific institutional capacities, policies, planning processes and
financing are needed to advance DRR.
8. FINDINGS: FINANCING FOR DRR IN AGRICULTURE
The number of countries allocating national funds to DRR is
increasing, but the AG sector does not directly benefit.
In most countries AG ministries have no specific budget
line for DRR: ad-hoc project funds are used for DRR
activities.
The HFA has focused on securing stand-alone financial
resources for DRR, but this is insufficient.
There is a need for specific financial allocations for DRR
within sectoral ministries and departments.
9. FINDINGS: DRIVERS MAINSTREAMING DRR IN AG
The HFA was the primary driver for the development of
national DRR policies/strategies/plans ; BUT it was not
the main driver for DRR mainstreaming across sectors.
The drivers for mainstreaming DRR in AG are:
Clear national policies that make mainstreaming DRR into
development sectors an explicit high level priority.
The government’s understanding of the nexus between disaster
risk and sustainable agricultural development.
The global agenda on climate change adaptation
10. EMERGING TRENDS FOR DRR WITHIN AGRICULTURE
Development of sector-specific plans for DRR addressing
DRR measures along the 5 HFA priorities (Bangladesh, Belize,
Cambodia, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana; Jamaica, Lao PDR, Nepal, Peru,
Philippines, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent & Grenadines, South Africa, etc.)
Development of institutional mechanisms and sectoral
planning instruments that integrate DRR and CCA;
(Bangladesh, Nepal, Pacific Islands States, Peru, etc.)
Trends provide models for accelerating sector mainstreaming
11. RECOMMENDATION 1 :
PRIORITIZE AGRICULTURE/ FOOD AND NUTRITION
SECURITY AS A CRITICAL SECTOR IN HFA2
Select critical sectors and themes for DRR, in which progress
needs to be bold – e.g. productive sectors like agriculture.
“unpack” DRR into core building blocks that translate meaningfully
into sustainable development.
Set DRR related goals, targets and indicators for critical sectors.
Example of specific commitments for the AG sector:
Reduce by half the losses suffered in AG as a result of disasters
Commit to measure risk and account for losses in the AG sector
12. RECOMMENDATION 2:
PROPOSE CLEAR FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS FOR DRR
IN KEY DEVELOPMENT SECTORS
DRR financing and delivery will be more effective once DRR has
been mainstreamed into sectoral development agendas
Propose financial commitments for DRR to sectors at national
planning level
Advocate for resource allocation for DRR within sector budgets
at central level
Target decentralized resource allocations through and across
sub-national sectoral departments
13. RECOMMENDATION 3:
BE COHERENT WITH THE OTHER POST-2015 GLOBAL
AGENDAS
Ensure synergies with all post-2015 development agendas
regarding DRR:
introduce risk-sensitivity across SDGs and mainstream risk
reduction measures into targets/indicators
Use the HFA2 as the common pathway to deliver and monitor
the disaster risk specific issues (to be also) accommodated in
the SDG and CCA agendas.
In the review, the agriculture sector is understood to encompass the crops, livestock, fisheries and forestry sub-sectors.
The review focuses on the following core indicators of the HFA:
HFA PRIORITY 1: Ensure that disaster risk reduction is a national and local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation.
Core Indicator 1: National policy and legal framework for disaster risk reduction exists with decentralized responsibilities and capacities at all levels
Core Indicator 2: Dedicated and adequate resources are available to implement disaster risk reduction plans and activities at all administrative levels
Core Indicator 3: Community participation and decentralization are ensured through the delegation of authority and resources to local levels
HFA PRIORITY 5: Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels:
Core Indicator 1: Strong policy, technical and institutional capacities and mechanisms for disaster risk management, with a disaster risk reduction perspective are in place.
30 countries: Afghanistan, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Cambodia, Chad, DRC, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Lao PDR, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania Uganda.
For the selection of these countries FAO considered 10 established and well recognized indexes of countries at risk, listed below. Six of these indexes identify and rank countries most at risk of natural hazards and crises based on different criteria or methodologies. Two indexes are on vulnerability to climate change and another two indexes focus on malnutrition and hunger, that is, those having the highest incidence of undernourishment (in millions and as percentage).
Indexes on risk (natural hazards)
Countries most exposed to multiple hazards, from Natural Disaster Hotspots: a Global Risk Analysis
World Risk Index 2012
Global Focus Model (GFM) 2013, of countries at risk, from UNOCHA.
Countries found in conditions of protracted crisis, from FAO.
Multiple hazards mortality risk, from UNISDR 2009
Global Needs Assessment Vulnerability Index 2011-2012 by the European Commission
Indexes on risk (climate change)
Critical List: The 100 nations most vulnerable to climate change by the IIED.
Impacts of Climate Change by the Centre of Global Development.
Indexes on food insecurity
Prevalence of undernourishment (number of undernourished people per country) by FAO.
Prevalence of undernourishment (percentage of population suffering from undernourishment) by FAO.
The plans have a wide diversity of DRR measures, reflecting a combination of some of the HFA PFA in ad hoc manner:
HFA PA 1: is not given priority.
HFA PA 3: receives very limited attention in sector plans reviewed.
HFA PA 4: receives a high degree of priority in agriculture development plans.
HFA PA 2 and 5: these are the most commonly addressed in agricultural development plans, suggesting a persistent focus on risk management rather than DRR.
The plans have a wide diversity of DRR measures, reflecting a combination of some of the HFA PFA in ad hoc manner:
HFA PA 1: is not given priority, measures on risk governance mainly at the activity level
HFA PA 3: receives very limited attention in sector plans reviewed
HFA PA 4: receives a high degree of priority in agriculture development plans; reasons not always clear/explained but it tends to relate to the key role of appropriate agricultural technologies and practices in building resilient livelihoods
HFA PA 2 and 5: early warning and preparedness are the most common measures in agricultural development plans, possibly reflecting their importance to the sector. In some cases it may reflect the continued emphasis on risk management rather than the broader set of measures of DRR.
HFA PA 1. Make Disaster Risk Reduction a Priority: Ensure that disaster risk reduction is a national and a local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation.
HFA PA 2. Know the Risks and Take Action: Identify, assess, and monitor disaster risks - and enhance early warning.
HFA PA 3. Build Understanding and Awareness: Use knowledge, innovation, and education to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels
HFA PA 4. Reduce Risk: Reduce the underlying risk factors.
HFA PA 5. Be Prepared and Ready to Act: Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels.
The successful mainstreaming of DRR in AG requires:
An internal capacity within ministries to drive DRR and an inter-institutional mechanism within the sector to coordinate and accelerate policy formulation and planning for DRR in agriculture.
The sector needs its own DRR planning process to define the vision, priority needs and strategic measures, informed by key stakeholders in the public and private in agriculture.
Resource allocation for DRR within the agriculture sector
Similar sector-specific capacities, planning processes and financing are needed at the local levels.
The indirect influence of the HFA has led to a slower mainstreaming process for the sector, considerably less so than if mainstreaming DRR had been understood from the onset as a process inclusive of all sectors and pursued in parallel to mainstreaming in broader development policies and plans.
Agriculture-specific plans are necessary for defining the overall vision, strategy, priorities and specific measures needed in DRR for the country’s agricultural sector. Ultimately these comprehensive DRR measures should be included as integral elements (among others) of the overall national agricultural development plans.
It is well-acknowledged by now that DRR is a cross-cutting theme and that sectors represent the development pathways where DRR can find its full expression and deliver concrete results.
The selection of critical sectors means “unpacking” DRR into core building blocks that translate in a meaningful way into sustainable development.
The suggested approach is similar to the strategic approach taken in the MDGs and the emerging post-2015 development agenda,