The Athena Plus project aims to enhance digital storytelling in cultural heritage by developing tools, contributing digital items to Europeana, and organizing training workshops. It focuses on the creation of online virtual and digital exhibitions, promoting knowledge dissemination through innovative web-based methods. The guidelines provided detail best practices for cultural institutions in presenting digital exhibitions, distinguishing between traditional and virtual formats.

1. ATHENA Plus tools for digital storytelling
Maria Teresa Natale, Marzia Piccininno (ICCU) Sam Habibi Minelli, Paolo Ongaro, Rubino Saccoccio, Daniele Ugoletti (Gruppo Meta) Marc Aguilar Santiago (i2cat)
Barbara Dierickx (Packed)
10 November 2014
EVA / Minerva 2014
XIth Annual International Conference for Professionals in Cultural Heritage

2. Athena Plus is a Best practice network whose main objectives are:
• Contribute 3.000.000 digital items to Europeana
• Develop a Terminology Management Platform to edit and map multilingual thesauri and terminologies
• Develop creative tools for digital exhibitions, cultural routes and educations
• Organize workshop and trainings for GLAMs and experts We are a project of the Europeana ecosystem.
About us

3. • 40 partners
• 21 EU member state countries
• 25 languages
• 30 months (March 2013 – August 2015)
AthenaPlus builds on successful
experiences developed in the previous ATHENA and Linked Heritage projects:
AthenaPlus works at the development of standards that supports interoperability with Europeana.
Facts & Figures

4. •One of the main goals of public and private cultural institutions (GLAMs) is the promotion and dissemination of knowledge.
•They accomplish their mission thanks to knowledge dissemination tools that include, among others, temporary and permanent exhibitions that follow codified models, whose goal is to expose citizens to the national and international cultural and artistic heritage.
4
Knowledge dissemination

5. The meeting between the languages and methods of traditional cultural promotion (non-virtual exhibitions) and the promotion and dissemination of knowledge through web-based methods (online virtual exhibitions) made it necessary in 2011 to draft shared guidelines and recommendations to encourage the use of the web and maximize its potential.
5
Guidelines need

6. These guidelines, aimed at:
•Illustrating the state of the art on online virtual exhibitions, both on the basis of the actual experience accrued by various cultural institutes and the observation and analysis of international products
•clarifying some concepts that in literature are not yet fully codified, and giving some recommendations and a tool kit to institutions who want to realise projects.
ITALIAN, ENGLISH, ARABIC EDITIONS
6
Guidelines

7. •The term exposition, in its broadest sense, indicates the rational process through which one attempts to divulge a concept or topic by explaining its logical content or linking it to other concepts or topics that help highlight its meaning
•The term exhibition indicate an event with a specific venue and time, during which the public can enjoy a series of objects, related to one another and organized according to logical, thematic, spatial, historic, and/or authorial criteria, and made accessible either permanently or temporarily, through one or more narrative routes, with scientific, didactic, and/or promotional goals.
•Cultural institutions are increasingly recurring to exhibitions that fall outside the traditional space/time parameters, and are instead staged on IT platforms accessible via the web: these are virtual/digital exhibitions.
7
Glossary

8. Current debate: digital exhibition vs. virtual exhibition
Virtual exhibitions: to be used mainly in the case of 3D reconstructions in which there is actually also a virtualization environment in which the works are located.
Digital exhibitions: the object is not faced with any kind of reconstruction, the work of art is approached "individually", included in a "path" that performs logical combination of materials based on different criteria: subject, author, time , technicalities, ...
Glossary

9. 9
Digital Exhibitions

10. 10
Thematic routes

11. •Virtual/digital exhibitions are often generated by real events, even though they may result in products that are autonomous, due to the web language they use.
•Online virtual/digital exhibitions can be staged with more or less sophisticated IT tools, depending on the degree of complexity and the goals in question.
11
Digital Exhibitions

12. •In summary, a collection of digital items, in and of itself, does not constitute a material or virtual exhibition. It is only when the items are carefully selected to illustrate a topic, and are tied together forming a narrative or a logical itinerary, that they constitute an exhibition.
•Online virtual/digital exhibitions, independently of degree of sophistication of the technology used, can and must be put together in such a way that they can provide alternative experiences to the real event, which can involve the user in a process of discovery, knowledge acquisition, and learning.
12
Digital Exhibitions

13. Any virtual/digital exhibition must rest upon an information architecture that makes up the logical and semantic organizational structure of the project’s information, content, processes and functionality. It is at the heart of any interaction design project.
The structure of a virtual/digital exhibition is composed of digital content, information and services.
13
CONTEXT
CONTENT
USERS
INFORMATION
SERVICES
CONTENT
DIGITAL
CONTENT
Digital Exhibitions

14. 14
During the conception phase, the contents of a virtual exhibition can be aggregated according to thematic relations, which may be more or less prevalent and non-exclusive depending on the objectives to be pursued, such as:
Spatial aggregation: objects are connected by real or reconstructed spatial links (e.g. geographic, environmental, urban, housing, etc.)
Temporal aggregation: objects are connected by chronological links (e.g. historical period, event, celebration, phase, etc.)
Typological aggregation: objects are connected by their typology (e.g. style, manufacturing technique, material, production, etc.)
Comparative aggregation: objects are aggregated on the basis of links arising out of the comparison with other models, thus creating a network of similar contents (e.g. comparisons between civilizations, roles, etc.).
Digital Exhibitions

15. 15
In addition, there are aggregations which take into account the target audience and the relationship with users: Functional aggregation: function and/or goal which the exhibition can help meet (for example, target users: schools for the disabled, university students … or educational/didactic purposes) Behavioural aggregation: when the exhibition encourages and develops behaviours that can attract other behaviours. This is the case with regards to interactions between multiple communities of users and/or visitors, which bring about broader relationships and new developments (e.g. interactive and community areas, Web 2.0 features).
Digital Exhibitions
WP5-WP6 Technical meeting Bucharest, 12 March 2014

16. Advantages of digital exhbitions

17. Advantages of digital exhbitions

18. MOVIO Kit

19. MOVIO Kit

21. MOVIO

22. 1
2
Natively mobile

23. SINGLE EXHIBITION
MOVIO-APP
COLLECTION of EXHIBITIONS
MOVIO-HUB
YOU
The HUB
A catalogue of exhibitions: MOVIO HUB

24. Europeana API

25. MOVIO FAQs

26. MOVIO Archive Case study
www.litaliachiamo.it
Story of the telephone in Italy, though digital resouces of the Archives of Telecom Italia
Stories told using the storyteller (text, video, audio, images) Connection to contents generated with the ontology builder Timelines APP version

27. PILOTS
The International Center for Information Management Systems and Services, PL
Hungarian National Gallery, HU
Nationalmuseum Sweden SE;
Šiauliai Aušros Museum, LT
Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports, GR
The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information, IT
Hungarian Open Air Museum, HU
Lithuanian Art Museum, LT
Museum of Arts and Crafts, HR
Romanian Academy Library, RO
Etruscan National Museum, IT
Museo del Risorgimento, IT
Biblioteca Alessandrina, IT
Bibblioteca Universitaria di Pavia, IT
Biblioteca di storia moderna e contemporanea, IT
Senato della Repubblica, IT
And they are growing thanks to cooperation agreements with ATHENA PLUS
AthenaPlus Pilots
COLLABORATIVE WORKING
TRAINING
BUILDING AN EXHIBITION
TESTING AND MONITORING
SOFTWARE IMPROVEMENT
FINAL USER INVOLVEMENTS

28. Learn MOVIO
http://wiki.athenaplus.eu/index.php/MOVIO

29. References
MOVIO Video: http://youtu.be/JDFXEgmTvB8 MOVIO websites: http://www.movio.beniculturali.it http://www.gruppometa.it/it/44/movio AthenaPlus wiki: http://wiki.athenaplus.eu AthenaPlus community: http://athenaplus.wordpress.com AthenaPlus public deliverables and documents: http://www.athenaplus.eu/index.php?en/156/deliverables-and-documents Digital exhibition guidelines http://www.indicate-project.org/getFile.php?id=412 (English) http://www.otebac.it/getFile.php?id=507 (italian) http://www.indicate-project.org/getFile.php?id=481 (Arabic) Some exhibitions curated using MOVIO: http://www.movio.beniculturali.it/index.php?it/68/mostre-realizzate CMS MOVIO: Code request form: http://www.movio.beniculturali.it/index.php?en/73/cms-movio-code-request-form

30. 1) Plan your own school trip
2) City quest (Mobile/app)-QR Code
3) Maps of Europe (standalone smartboard app)
Other ATHENA plus creative tools

31. •School trip planner
•Cultural sites
•Journal planning
•Cross-course

32. •CITY QUEST
•Tablet app
•Collection linked to city, region, …
•Find the cultural content and win the race

33. •MAPS OF EUROPE
•Smartboard app
•Based on Europeana API
•100 years back in time: what was happening in Europe?

34. Connecting with AthenaPlus
• www.athenaplus.eu
• https://twitter.com/AthenaPlusEU
• http://linkd.in/19XwWOz
• info@athenaplus.eu

35. Thanks!!!
Maria Teresa Natale1, Sam Habibi Minelli2, Barbara Dierickx3, Paolo Ongaro2, Marzia Piccininno1, Daniele Ugoletti2, Rubino Saccoccio2, Alberto Raggioli2
1Istituto centrale per il catalogo unico delle biblioteche (ICCU), {mariateresa.natale, marzia.piccininno}
@beniculturali.it
2 GruppoMeta
{sam.minelli, paolo.ongaro, daniele.ugoletti, rubino.saccoccio, alberto.raggioli}@gruppometa.it
3 PACKED vzw
{barbara}@packed.be
4 I2CAT
{marc.aguilar}@i2cat.es