2014 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2014.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
This document discusses discovery tools in academic libraries. It begins by outlining the benefits of discovery tools like Google Scholar, such as being free, user-friendly, and allowing searches of multiple resources simultaneously. However, it notes Google Scholar's limitations in sorting results, limiting searches, and lack of access to database algorithms. The document then defines discovery tools, explaining they feature a central index of metadata and full text from various sources, and a discovery layer that allows single searches across this content with relevance ranking and filtering of results. It evaluates parameters of the central index and considers options for blending or separating search results from the library catalog, articles, and other sources. Finally, it discusses major discovery tool providers and the Open Discovery Initiative
The document summarizes current and emerging trends in library services discussed in a KLA webinar. It covers topics like cloud-based library services from providers like OCLC and EBSCO; web-scale discovery services and their advantages over federated search; remote access technologies like Google Scholar's CASA and library links programs; electronic resource management systems; and library service platforms like FOLIO and commercial options. It also discusses event and room booking software like LibCal.
This document discusses web-scale discovery services (WDS), including what they are, their key features and benefits, examples of major WDS providers, and considerations for implementation. Specifically:
- WDS allows users to search a library's entire collection through a single search box, ranking results based on relevancy across sources. This is presented as an improvement over federated search.
- Major WDS providers discussed include EBSCO Discovery Service, Ex Libris Primo, Serials Solutions Summon, and OCLC's WorldCat Local.
- A comparison of these providers shows they index a variety of content like the library catalog, e-books, journals, and more.
- The
The document compares web scale discovery services and federated search. Federated search allows real-time searching across multiple sources but is an older technology. Discovery services use pre-harvested metadata from vast collections and provide a unified search platform, centralized index, and relevancy ranking across all results in a single interface. While federated search relies on real-time queries, discovery services provide faster searches through pre-built harvesting and indexing.
Web scale Discovery services are becoming the most sought after solution for Libraries to connect its patrons with the relevant information they seek. Many studies show that these services are getting wide acceptance from users as well as Library staff and making revolution in Library Information retrieval arena. Given such broad implications, selecting a new discovery service for libraries is an important undertaking. Library professionals should carefully evaluate options to meet their goal of finding the best potential match for their library. This Paper attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of Library Web Scale Discovery solutions by depicting various facets of Web Scale Discovery, how it differs from federated searching and highlights the important parameters to be considered for taking an informed and confident decision on selecting discovery service.
Cloud web scale discovery services landscape an overviewNikesh Narayanan
Abstract
The impact of Internet and Google like search engines radically influenced the information behavior of Net Generation users. They expect same environment in library services such that all their required information make available in a single set of results through unified search across all the available resources. Libraries have been striving to respond to this challenge for years. Until recently, federated search technology of the past decade was the better attempt in this area to meet these user expectations. But federated search solution is marked by the drawbacks of its slowness as it searches each database on the fly. New Generation cloud based Library Web scale discovery technology is a promising entrant in this landscape. This Paper attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of Library Web Scale Discovery solutions by depicting various facets of Web Scale Discovery solutions such as its importance to Library field, their possible role as the starting point for research, content coverage, and finally analyses the competition at the discovery front by comparing the services of major players. The comparative analysis shows that all the major service providers are extending competitive features and services, but varies in some areas and the adoption choice depends on the concerned library’s preferences and the cost involved.
Web Scale Discovery Services: Google like search experienceNikesh Narayanan
This document discusses web-scale discovery services as a solution for users' difficulties in finding relevant information from a library's resources. It notes that users often start their research on Google instead of the library website due to the library lacking a single search point for all subscribed resources. A web-scale discovery service provides a Google-like search experience through pre-harvesting and indexing all library resources into a unified index, allowing users to search across materials from a single search box. The document outlines several advantages of discovery services over traditional federated search engines or Google Scholar, such as improved relevancy ranking and the ability to filter by peer-reviewed or subject indexes. Studies show discovery services can increase usage of library resources and user satisfaction
Web-scale discovery tools have advantages like ease of use and speed but also limitations such as incomplete coverage and confusing interfaces. Instruction can help address limitations and move beyond just teaching tools to higher levels of information literacy. Discovery tools may index content inconsistently due to lack of metadata sharing between vendors. The interface can make it hard to distinguish resource types or access full text. Teaching how to develop search strategies and evaluate results can help students despite these limitations.
This document discusses discovery tools in academic libraries. It begins by outlining the benefits of discovery tools like Google Scholar, such as being free, user-friendly, and allowing searches of multiple resources simultaneously. However, it notes Google Scholar's limitations in sorting results, limiting searches, and lack of access to database algorithms. The document then defines discovery tools, explaining they feature a central index of metadata and full text from various sources, and a discovery layer that allows single searches across this content with relevance ranking and filtering of results. It evaluates parameters of the central index and considers options for blending or separating search results from the library catalog, articles, and other sources. Finally, it discusses major discovery tool providers and the Open Discovery Initiative
The document summarizes current and emerging trends in library services discussed in a KLA webinar. It covers topics like cloud-based library services from providers like OCLC and EBSCO; web-scale discovery services and their advantages over federated search; remote access technologies like Google Scholar's CASA and library links programs; electronic resource management systems; and library service platforms like FOLIO and commercial options. It also discusses event and room booking software like LibCal.
This document discusses web-scale discovery services (WDS), including what they are, their key features and benefits, examples of major WDS providers, and considerations for implementation. Specifically:
- WDS allows users to search a library's entire collection through a single search box, ranking results based on relevancy across sources. This is presented as an improvement over federated search.
- Major WDS providers discussed include EBSCO Discovery Service, Ex Libris Primo, Serials Solutions Summon, and OCLC's WorldCat Local.
- A comparison of these providers shows they index a variety of content like the library catalog, e-books, journals, and more.
- The
The document compares web scale discovery services and federated search. Federated search allows real-time searching across multiple sources but is an older technology. Discovery services use pre-harvested metadata from vast collections and provide a unified search platform, centralized index, and relevancy ranking across all results in a single interface. While federated search relies on real-time queries, discovery services provide faster searches through pre-built harvesting and indexing.
Web scale Discovery services are becoming the most sought after solution for Libraries to connect its patrons with the relevant information they seek. Many studies show that these services are getting wide acceptance from users as well as Library staff and making revolution in Library Information retrieval arena. Given such broad implications, selecting a new discovery service for libraries is an important undertaking. Library professionals should carefully evaluate options to meet their goal of finding the best potential match for their library. This Paper attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of Library Web Scale Discovery solutions by depicting various facets of Web Scale Discovery, how it differs from federated searching and highlights the important parameters to be considered for taking an informed and confident decision on selecting discovery service.
Cloud web scale discovery services landscape an overviewNikesh Narayanan
Abstract
The impact of Internet and Google like search engines radically influenced the information behavior of Net Generation users. They expect same environment in library services such that all their required information make available in a single set of results through unified search across all the available resources. Libraries have been striving to respond to this challenge for years. Until recently, federated search technology of the past decade was the better attempt in this area to meet these user expectations. But federated search solution is marked by the drawbacks of its slowness as it searches each database on the fly. New Generation cloud based Library Web scale discovery technology is a promising entrant in this landscape. This Paper attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of Library Web Scale Discovery solutions by depicting various facets of Web Scale Discovery solutions such as its importance to Library field, their possible role as the starting point for research, content coverage, and finally analyses the competition at the discovery front by comparing the services of major players. The comparative analysis shows that all the major service providers are extending competitive features and services, but varies in some areas and the adoption choice depends on the concerned library’s preferences and the cost involved.
Web Scale Discovery Services: Google like search experienceNikesh Narayanan
This document discusses web-scale discovery services as a solution for users' difficulties in finding relevant information from a library's resources. It notes that users often start their research on Google instead of the library website due to the library lacking a single search point for all subscribed resources. A web-scale discovery service provides a Google-like search experience through pre-harvesting and indexing all library resources into a unified index, allowing users to search across materials from a single search box. The document outlines several advantages of discovery services over traditional federated search engines or Google Scholar, such as improved relevancy ranking and the ability to filter by peer-reviewed or subject indexes. Studies show discovery services can increase usage of library resources and user satisfaction
Web-scale discovery tools have advantages like ease of use and speed but also limitations such as incomplete coverage and confusing interfaces. Instruction can help address limitations and move beyond just teaching tools to higher levels of information literacy. Discovery tools may index content inconsistently due to lack of metadata sharing between vendors. The interface can make it hard to distinguish resource types or access full text. Teaching how to develop search strategies and evaluate results can help students despite these limitations.
Discovery platforms: Technology, tools and issuessaiful76
This document discusses the evolution of discovery tools from printed catalogues to modern integrated discovery platforms. It outlines the key features and limitations of traditional OPACs, federated search services, discovery interfaces, and web-scale discovery services. The conclusion emphasizes that no single system is perfect, and that as content becomes more open, discovery solutions should focus on open and extensible platforms that are also affordable.
Web-scale Discovery Services are becoming an integral part of libraries' information gathering arsenal. These services are able to use a single interface to seamlessly integrate results from a wide range of online sources, emulating the experience patrons have come to expect from Internet search engines. But despite their ability to streamline searching, discovery services provide a wide set of challenges for libraries who implement them. This virtual conference will touch on both the potential of discovery services as well as some of the issues involved.
Federated to Library Service Platforms
Nikesh Narayanan discusses the transition from individual library databases to integrated search platforms. He covers why integrated search is important, options like federated search and web-scale discovery, parameters for evaluating these systems, and recent advances like linked data and integration with knowledge graphs. Library service platforms are emerging as all-in-one solutions that manage collections, discovery, resource management and more. Major commercial providers and the open source FOLIO project are outlined.
- Web scale discovery services provide a single search box to search across a library's subscribed resources including journals, books, databases, and more. They index these resources upfront to provide fast search results compared to federated search which searches resources individually.
- Key parameters for evaluating discovery services include coverage, relevance ranking methodology, metadata quality, search refinement options, value-added features, and customer support. Subject indexing can be improved through "platform blending" which leverages subject indexes from databases.
- User studies have shown discovery services can improve search effectiveness for users compared to individual library databases or Google Scholar. Local support from the discovery service provider is important.
Web scale discovery services have stronger functionality than Google Scholar for searching library resources. Discovery services allow limiting searches to a library's subscribed resources only, to peer-reviewed articles only, and integrate a library's catalogue and institutional repositories. They support more filtering facets and integration of subject indexes, Scopus, and Web of Science. However, Google Scholar may update search results more quickly, cover more open access and free sources, and have better relevancy and consistent features due to its focus on article searching.
Role of libraries in research and scholarly communicationNikesh Narayanan
Libraries play an important role in supporting research through facilitating literature searches, providing information literacy and reference services, and guiding researchers in publishing and managing their research profiles. Libraries can help researchers efficiently search across disjointed information sources through federated search software or web-scale discovery tools which provide a single search interface. Libraries also help connect researchers to open access resources and guide them on where and how to publish their research findings.
MCCP 7012 Effective Literature Searching 2015-2016HKBU Library
This document provides an overview of an effective literature searching workshop conducted by HKBU Library. It discusses locating relevant materials through the library catalog, databases, and online search tools. It also covers services for maintaining current awareness like alerts and RSS feeds. The document emphasizes avoiding plagiarism through proper citation of sources. Overall, it aims to help students understand library resources and services that can support their research needs.
Leeds Met Open Search - towards an integrated solution for research and OERNick Sheppard
The document discusses the development of an integrated search solution at Leeds Met for both open access research outputs and open educational resources (OERs). It describes how the university adapted its existing repository to provide an Open Search interface for both research and OER materials. Key features of the Open Search implementation include advanced search and browsing capabilities, identifying materials by content type, and differentially formatting research results. Ongoing work focuses on areas like search engine optimization, differentiating research by type, and improving the RSS feeds.
The document discusses how libraries provide access to publisher content through various systems like the library catalog, OpenURL link resolver, and discovery service. Publisher-provided metadata is key to enabling access in these systems. Metadata is distributed from publishers to libraries and other sources. Any system that supports OpenURL can potentially link users to publisher content, not just the library catalog. Ensuring accurate metadata is important for proper functioning of these access systems.
The document discusses criteria for evaluating search engines, including recall, precision, novelty/up-to-datedness, search time, database, relevancy, indexing, user interface, query functionality, and help/advanced search options. Recall is defined as the fraction of relevant search results retrieved from the database, and precision is the fraction of retrieved results that are relevant. High recall and precision are important for search engines. Other factors like indexing speed, up-to-datedness of the database, relevancy algorithms, user experience, and support functions also impact search engine quality.
Federated Search: The Good, The Bad And The Uglydorishelfer
Presented at the SLA 2007 Annual Conference in Denver, CO to the Science and Technology Division (Sci-Tech) on a program entitled: "Federated Searching: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly." Based on an article in Searcher and with additional contributions from Kathy Dabbour and Lynn Lampert on user and librarian assessment of Federated Searching.
Discovery Systems: Connecting the 21st Century Academic User to ContentAthena Hoeppner
Discovery systems couple a central index of metadata and content with a feature-rich discovery layer to help users find information. UCF's discovery service indexes over 690 million records from various sources and links users to full text over 80% of the time. Studies found it included relevant high-quality content for nursing and science papers. Embedding discovery into learning management systems reduces cognitive load for online students and simplifies accessing full text from courses. Discovery services also expose open access outputs by including them prominently.
The document discusses federated search engines, which allow simultaneous searching of multiple distributed information sources from a single search interface. Federated search engines provide access to the "deep web" that common search engines cannot index. They work by submitting user queries to various deep web resources and aggregating the results. The document compares features of federated search engines to normal search engines. It also outlines criteria for selecting the best federated search engine, and provides examples like MetaLib and WebFeat.
KBART (Knowledge Bases and Related Tools) is a joint NISO and UKSG project that establishes best practices for content providers to supply metadata to knowledgebase vendors in order to ensure users can access subscribed content. The document discusses the KBART recommended practices for data elements, file format, and frequency of exchange, as well as the KBART endorsement process and priorities such as expanding endorsements and education.
Chuyến Công tác Nhà xuất bản Eewoww vừa qua ( 29/11/2016 - 2/12/2016) đến 6 trường Đại học khu vực thành phố Hồ Chí Minh ( Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành, Đại học Nông Lâm, Đại học Sư Phạm TPHCM, Đại học Sư Phạm Kỹ Thuật, Đại học Công Nghiệp, Đại học Công Nghiệp Thực Phẩm).
Các thầy cô có thể đăng nhập sử dụng hệ thống theo hướng dẫn.
Hỗ trơ người dùng :
a) File hướng dẫn sử dụng hệ thống chi tiết.
b) File trình bày chuyên gia Iris Hsu.
c) 12 Video clip hướng dẫn chi tiết sử dụng hệ thống Eewoww: https://goo.gl/PbcL5r
d) Link hỗ trợ online: https://goo.gl/GYU5wf
e) Thông tin hỗ trợ trực tiếp: Mr Tân 0902458694 - 0981649822 ( tan.huynh@ieg.com.vn -tanhm.igroupvietnam@gmail.com )
Một số thông tin phản hồi :
a. Những Feedback của các cán bộ, giảng viên tham dự: https://goo.gl/q5swZs
b. Một số hình ảnh và bài viết:
- Link hình ảnh: https://goo.gl/pUmYRz
- Link bài viết:
- ĐH Nguyễn Tất Thành kí kết hợp tác với IEG Việt Nam
- HỘI THẢO KHOA HỌC “NGHIÊN CỨU KHOA HỌC CỦA SINH VIÊN VÀ CÁN BỘ TRẺ CÁC TRƯỜNG SƯ PHẠM TOÀN QUỐC”
- Hội thảo Ứng dụng công nghệ số trong đổi mới giảng dạy, học tập và đánh giá cho giảng viên các trường ĐH, CĐ.
- Thông báo Sử dụng hệ thống Eewoww - Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội.
*** Nội dung đính kèm :
- File hướng dẫn sử dụng hệ thống chi tiết.
- File trình bày chuyên gia Iris Hsu.
Trân trọng
Mẹo sử dụng nhanh hệ thống gửi đến Thầy Cô :
Bước 1: Thầy/cô đăng nhập vào http://eewoww.com/ tạo tài khoản ( Sign Up now) làm theo hướng dẫn đăng nhập vào giao diện trực tiếp trên website.
Bước 2: Tải 2 công cụ đắc lực hệ thống
- Web importer ( chỉ cần kéo thả vào thanh công cụ của trình duyệt )
- Citation tool ( nhấp mục menu trên giao diện chọn down loafd nhấp theo hướng dẫn để add-in vào microsoft Word)
Bước 3: Đọc thêm hướng dẫn và xem video clip để sử dụng hiệu quả hơn.
The document discusses three projects undertaken by librarians at UNC-Chapel Hill to increase open access content in their institutional repository in order to support the university's open access policy. The projects involved depositing articles by highly cited researchers, gathering metadata on authors' publications using alerts and citations, and reviewing CVs to identify additional content. Through these efforts, the librarians deposited over 350 previously paywalled articles and identified over 5,700 total publications. The projects revealed challenges with getting faculty to deposit their work and confusion about open access policies. Going forward, the librarians plan to expand their methods for identifying content and improve faculty outreach.
- CrossCheck has rebranded to Crossref Similarity Check to provide clearer messaging and reduce confusion.
- The service checks documents against over 53 million papers from over 1200 publishers, as well as 105 million items from other sources and over 60 billion web pages.
- Over 1200 Crossref publishers and over 100 Brazilian publishers are using the service, with increasing usage in countries like Japan, South Korea, and Turkey.
- Publishers are looking to identify issues like poor references, self-plagiarism, unattributed use of others' works, and submitting others' works as their own through the similarity checking service.
This presentation was provided by Todd Carpenter, Executive Director of NISO, and Nettie Lagace, NISO on June 25, during a ALA session devoted to Altmetrics.
This webinar will explain what text-mining is and why it is important to text-mine research papers. We will consider real-world use-cases and applications and discuss barriers to wider adoption of text-mining.
We will also provide practical advice on how to start text-mining research papers, such as where to obtain data, how to access relevant APIs and highlight some of the tools that are available.
This presentation was provided by Marshall Breeding, Independent Consultant and Founder of Library Technology Guides; Co-Chair, ODI Working Group, at the
2012 NISO Standards Update at ALA.
The document discusses several resource discovery tools that can be used to search for scholarly materials across different types of content. It provides information on tools such as Google Scholar, EBSCO Discovery Service, ProQuest, SirsiDynix, Scopus, and WorldCat. Each tool is summarized, outlining its key features and functions in allowing users to discover resources for research and learning.
Discovery platforms: Technology, tools and issuessaiful76
This document discusses the evolution of discovery tools from printed catalogues to modern integrated discovery platforms. It outlines the key features and limitations of traditional OPACs, federated search services, discovery interfaces, and web-scale discovery services. The conclusion emphasizes that no single system is perfect, and that as content becomes more open, discovery solutions should focus on open and extensible platforms that are also affordable.
Web-scale Discovery Services are becoming an integral part of libraries' information gathering arsenal. These services are able to use a single interface to seamlessly integrate results from a wide range of online sources, emulating the experience patrons have come to expect from Internet search engines. But despite their ability to streamline searching, discovery services provide a wide set of challenges for libraries who implement them. This virtual conference will touch on both the potential of discovery services as well as some of the issues involved.
Federated to Library Service Platforms
Nikesh Narayanan discusses the transition from individual library databases to integrated search platforms. He covers why integrated search is important, options like federated search and web-scale discovery, parameters for evaluating these systems, and recent advances like linked data and integration with knowledge graphs. Library service platforms are emerging as all-in-one solutions that manage collections, discovery, resource management and more. Major commercial providers and the open source FOLIO project are outlined.
- Web scale discovery services provide a single search box to search across a library's subscribed resources including journals, books, databases, and more. They index these resources upfront to provide fast search results compared to federated search which searches resources individually.
- Key parameters for evaluating discovery services include coverage, relevance ranking methodology, metadata quality, search refinement options, value-added features, and customer support. Subject indexing can be improved through "platform blending" which leverages subject indexes from databases.
- User studies have shown discovery services can improve search effectiveness for users compared to individual library databases or Google Scholar. Local support from the discovery service provider is important.
Web scale discovery services have stronger functionality than Google Scholar for searching library resources. Discovery services allow limiting searches to a library's subscribed resources only, to peer-reviewed articles only, and integrate a library's catalogue and institutional repositories. They support more filtering facets and integration of subject indexes, Scopus, and Web of Science. However, Google Scholar may update search results more quickly, cover more open access and free sources, and have better relevancy and consistent features due to its focus on article searching.
Role of libraries in research and scholarly communicationNikesh Narayanan
Libraries play an important role in supporting research through facilitating literature searches, providing information literacy and reference services, and guiding researchers in publishing and managing their research profiles. Libraries can help researchers efficiently search across disjointed information sources through federated search software or web-scale discovery tools which provide a single search interface. Libraries also help connect researchers to open access resources and guide them on where and how to publish their research findings.
MCCP 7012 Effective Literature Searching 2015-2016HKBU Library
This document provides an overview of an effective literature searching workshop conducted by HKBU Library. It discusses locating relevant materials through the library catalog, databases, and online search tools. It also covers services for maintaining current awareness like alerts and RSS feeds. The document emphasizes avoiding plagiarism through proper citation of sources. Overall, it aims to help students understand library resources and services that can support their research needs.
Leeds Met Open Search - towards an integrated solution for research and OERNick Sheppard
The document discusses the development of an integrated search solution at Leeds Met for both open access research outputs and open educational resources (OERs). It describes how the university adapted its existing repository to provide an Open Search interface for both research and OER materials. Key features of the Open Search implementation include advanced search and browsing capabilities, identifying materials by content type, and differentially formatting research results. Ongoing work focuses on areas like search engine optimization, differentiating research by type, and improving the RSS feeds.
The document discusses how libraries provide access to publisher content through various systems like the library catalog, OpenURL link resolver, and discovery service. Publisher-provided metadata is key to enabling access in these systems. Metadata is distributed from publishers to libraries and other sources. Any system that supports OpenURL can potentially link users to publisher content, not just the library catalog. Ensuring accurate metadata is important for proper functioning of these access systems.
The document discusses criteria for evaluating search engines, including recall, precision, novelty/up-to-datedness, search time, database, relevancy, indexing, user interface, query functionality, and help/advanced search options. Recall is defined as the fraction of relevant search results retrieved from the database, and precision is the fraction of retrieved results that are relevant. High recall and precision are important for search engines. Other factors like indexing speed, up-to-datedness of the database, relevancy algorithms, user experience, and support functions also impact search engine quality.
Federated Search: The Good, The Bad And The Uglydorishelfer
Presented at the SLA 2007 Annual Conference in Denver, CO to the Science and Technology Division (Sci-Tech) on a program entitled: "Federated Searching: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly." Based on an article in Searcher and with additional contributions from Kathy Dabbour and Lynn Lampert on user and librarian assessment of Federated Searching.
Discovery Systems: Connecting the 21st Century Academic User to ContentAthena Hoeppner
Discovery systems couple a central index of metadata and content with a feature-rich discovery layer to help users find information. UCF's discovery service indexes over 690 million records from various sources and links users to full text over 80% of the time. Studies found it included relevant high-quality content for nursing and science papers. Embedding discovery into learning management systems reduces cognitive load for online students and simplifies accessing full text from courses. Discovery services also expose open access outputs by including them prominently.
The document discusses federated search engines, which allow simultaneous searching of multiple distributed information sources from a single search interface. Federated search engines provide access to the "deep web" that common search engines cannot index. They work by submitting user queries to various deep web resources and aggregating the results. The document compares features of federated search engines to normal search engines. It also outlines criteria for selecting the best federated search engine, and provides examples like MetaLib and WebFeat.
KBART (Knowledge Bases and Related Tools) is a joint NISO and UKSG project that establishes best practices for content providers to supply metadata to knowledgebase vendors in order to ensure users can access subscribed content. The document discusses the KBART recommended practices for data elements, file format, and frequency of exchange, as well as the KBART endorsement process and priorities such as expanding endorsements and education.
Chuyến Công tác Nhà xuất bản Eewoww vừa qua ( 29/11/2016 - 2/12/2016) đến 6 trường Đại học khu vực thành phố Hồ Chí Minh ( Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành, Đại học Nông Lâm, Đại học Sư Phạm TPHCM, Đại học Sư Phạm Kỹ Thuật, Đại học Công Nghiệp, Đại học Công Nghiệp Thực Phẩm).
Các thầy cô có thể đăng nhập sử dụng hệ thống theo hướng dẫn.
Hỗ trơ người dùng :
a) File hướng dẫn sử dụng hệ thống chi tiết.
b) File trình bày chuyên gia Iris Hsu.
c) 12 Video clip hướng dẫn chi tiết sử dụng hệ thống Eewoww: https://goo.gl/PbcL5r
d) Link hỗ trợ online: https://goo.gl/GYU5wf
e) Thông tin hỗ trợ trực tiếp: Mr Tân 0902458694 - 0981649822 ( tan.huynh@ieg.com.vn -tanhm.igroupvietnam@gmail.com )
Một số thông tin phản hồi :
a. Những Feedback của các cán bộ, giảng viên tham dự: https://goo.gl/q5swZs
b. Một số hình ảnh và bài viết:
- Link hình ảnh: https://goo.gl/pUmYRz
- Link bài viết:
- ĐH Nguyễn Tất Thành kí kết hợp tác với IEG Việt Nam
- HỘI THẢO KHOA HỌC “NGHIÊN CỨU KHOA HỌC CỦA SINH VIÊN VÀ CÁN BỘ TRẺ CÁC TRƯỜNG SƯ PHẠM TOÀN QUỐC”
- Hội thảo Ứng dụng công nghệ số trong đổi mới giảng dạy, học tập và đánh giá cho giảng viên các trường ĐH, CĐ.
- Thông báo Sử dụng hệ thống Eewoww - Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội.
*** Nội dung đính kèm :
- File hướng dẫn sử dụng hệ thống chi tiết.
- File trình bày chuyên gia Iris Hsu.
Trân trọng
Mẹo sử dụng nhanh hệ thống gửi đến Thầy Cô :
Bước 1: Thầy/cô đăng nhập vào http://eewoww.com/ tạo tài khoản ( Sign Up now) làm theo hướng dẫn đăng nhập vào giao diện trực tiếp trên website.
Bước 2: Tải 2 công cụ đắc lực hệ thống
- Web importer ( chỉ cần kéo thả vào thanh công cụ của trình duyệt )
- Citation tool ( nhấp mục menu trên giao diện chọn down loafd nhấp theo hướng dẫn để add-in vào microsoft Word)
Bước 3: Đọc thêm hướng dẫn và xem video clip để sử dụng hiệu quả hơn.
The document discusses three projects undertaken by librarians at UNC-Chapel Hill to increase open access content in their institutional repository in order to support the university's open access policy. The projects involved depositing articles by highly cited researchers, gathering metadata on authors' publications using alerts and citations, and reviewing CVs to identify additional content. Through these efforts, the librarians deposited over 350 previously paywalled articles and identified over 5,700 total publications. The projects revealed challenges with getting faculty to deposit their work and confusion about open access policies. Going forward, the librarians plan to expand their methods for identifying content and improve faculty outreach.
- CrossCheck has rebranded to Crossref Similarity Check to provide clearer messaging and reduce confusion.
- The service checks documents against over 53 million papers from over 1200 publishers, as well as 105 million items from other sources and over 60 billion web pages.
- Over 1200 Crossref publishers and over 100 Brazilian publishers are using the service, with increasing usage in countries like Japan, South Korea, and Turkey.
- Publishers are looking to identify issues like poor references, self-plagiarism, unattributed use of others' works, and submitting others' works as their own through the similarity checking service.
This presentation was provided by Todd Carpenter, Executive Director of NISO, and Nettie Lagace, NISO on June 25, during a ALA session devoted to Altmetrics.
This webinar will explain what text-mining is and why it is important to text-mine research papers. We will consider real-world use-cases and applications and discuss barriers to wider adoption of text-mining.
We will also provide practical advice on how to start text-mining research papers, such as where to obtain data, how to access relevant APIs and highlight some of the tools that are available.
This presentation was provided by Marshall Breeding, Independent Consultant and Founder of Library Technology Guides; Co-Chair, ODI Working Group, at the
2012 NISO Standards Update at ALA.
The document discusses several resource discovery tools that can be used to search for scholarly materials across different types of content. It provides information on tools such as Google Scholar, EBSCO Discovery Service, ProQuest, SirsiDynix, Scopus, and WorldCat. Each tool is summarized, outlining its key features and functions in allowing users to discover resources for research and learning.
Academic libraries play an important role in supporting research in three key areas:
1. They facilitate literature searches through discovery services, subject databases, and remote access to subscribed resources. They also guide researchers on open access publishing and predatory journals.
2. They provide information literacy instruction and reference services to help researchers effectively find and evaluate information.
3. They assist researchers in managing their research profiles and outputs to increase visibility and track citations. This includes guidance on ORCID, Google Scholar, and Scopus profiles as well as publishing and citation metrics.
This workshop provides an overview of advanced subject searching techniques in specialized indexing databases. It covers formulating effective search strategies, such as using synonyms, broader/narrower terms, and Boolean logic. Search options like phrase searching, truncation, and proximity indicators are discussed. The workshop also demonstrates how to navigate database search results and features. Attendees will learn how to evaluate content coverage and choose appropriate databases for their research needs. Related workshops providing more in-depth training on specific databases and search tools are also mentioned.
Implementing web scale discovery services: special reference to Indian Librar...Nikesh Narayanan
Web scale Discovery services arebecoming the widely adopted Information Retrieval solution in libraries across the world to connect its patrons with the relevant information they seek. In lieu with the world trend, Resources Discovery Solution implementation is gathering momentum in Indian libraries also.
Considering the Indian Libraries scenario, this paper attempts to provide an overview of Library Web Scale Discovery solutions, its need in Indian Libraries, important parameters to be considered for evaluation of Discovery Services, essential factors to be considered prior to implementation, stages of implementation and finally some thoughts on post implementation analysis for measuring the success.
An introduction to the background, history, scope, and activities of the NISO Open Discovery Initiative. Part of the "Everyone's a player: Creation of standards in a fast-paced shared world" session.
Presenter: Marshall Breeding
Searching of Web and Electronic Resources Bramesha B
This document provides an overview of tools and techniques for searching the web and other online resources. It discusses the evolution of the internet from 1945 to present day. It then covers various types of search tools including search engines, meta search engines, directories, digital libraries, and scholarly communication directories. Finally, it outlines strategies for effective searching such as defining problems, selecting keywords, determining scope, and refining searches.
Subject gateways and portals are internet services that provide organized access to resources through description and links. [1] Subject gateways focus on discipline-specific resources selected by librarians to ensure high quality, while portals aggregate diverse information in a unified way. [2] Both services aim to address information overload by guiding users to relevant materials through browsing and searching capabilities.
Subject gateways and portals are Internet services that provide organized access to resources through description and links. [1] Subject gateways focus on discipline-specific resources selected by librarians to ensure high quality, while portals aggregate diverse information in a unified way. [2] Both services aim to address information overload by guiding users to relevant materials through browsing and searching capabilities.
The document provides guidance on smart research through online tools. It discusses literature search tools and platforms, reference management tools, where to publish research, managing research profiles, and measuring citation impact. It also discusses research data management tools, including the research data lifecycle, FAIR principles, stages of data management, funding agency requirements, data management plans, best practices, and managing sensitive data. The key topics covered are literature searching, reference management, publishing research, profiling research, measuring impact, and managing research data.
Subject gateways and portals are Internet services that facilitate systematic resource discovery. Subject gateways provide links to quality-controlled resources in a specific subject area, while portals aggregate diverse information from different sources into a single access point. Both services emerged in the late 1990s in response to the growing amount of online information and need to guide users to relevant resources. They continue evolving to better integrate information and meet modern user demands.
INFORMATION SKILLS: NAVIGATING RESEARCH IN LIBRARYChris Okiki
This document provides information and guidance about navigating research in library facilities. It discusses developing information literacy skills like improving discovery of resources, teaching information literacy courses, and deepening faculty collaboration. The document also addresses shifts in the library profession toward more of a focus on services, people, and enabling users rather than just products, facilities, and mediation. It provides examples of free online resources like Khan Academy and Omeka that libraries can offer. Finally, it offers tips for effective search strategies when using databases and electronic sources, including defining information needs, choosing appropriate sources, and using techniques like keyword searching, limiters, and Boolean operators.
Web-Scale Discovery: Post ImplementationRachel Vacek
Discovery services provide users a single
search box to access a library’s entire prei-ndexed collection. Representatives from
two academic libraries serving different
user populations will discuss marketing,
instructing users, evaluating the product,
and maintaining the resource after a
discovery service is implemented
The document discusses innovative technologies used in libraries and how librarians can utilize Google tools to provide library services. It describes technologies like library automation, digital libraries, and mobile libraries. It then explains how librarians can use various Google tools like Google Scholar, Google Books, Google News, Google Docs, and Google Sites to offer reference services, create online content and tutorials, manage collections, and provide customized information services to users."
OpenAthens Conference 2018 - Tim Lull and Chad Smith - Cultivating your onlin...OpenAthens
The document discusses strategies for improving library discovery and the end user experience. It emphasizes making library resources easy to find through a unified discovery service that allows full-text searching across databases. The discovery service should integrate well with the library website, authenticate users smoothly, and provide an intuitive interface optimized for mobile users. Data on several libraries shows discovery services dramatically increasing usage of online resources. Integrating with OpenAthens single sign-on can streamline authentication across devices for users. The Stacks discovery platform is highlighted as focusing on usability, design, and plug-and-play integrations to create the best digital experience for patrons and librarians.
Discovery systems aim to provide a more modern and user-friendly search experience compared to traditional ILS-based OPACs. They index content from a library's ILS as well as other sources to allow patrons to search across local and remote resources from a single interface. Early discovery systems depended on regular synchronization with the ILS, but the goal became developing web-scale discovery that could harvest and index content in real-time similarly to search engines like Google. Features such as faceted navigation, relevance ranking, and recommendations are now expected in discovery interfaces to meet user expectations.
The document discusses web scale discovery tools and their relationship to information literacy. It provides context on the social, economic, technological, and political factors driving adoption of these tools. It then examines perceptions of libraries and describes various commercial and open source discovery services. Desired features of discovery services and early experiences with them are outlined. However, the document notes tensions between a resource-based view of libraries versus an information literacy view. It poses four questions for debate around how well discovery tools support student development of information literacy skills and the need to augment these tools to better deliver on libraries' information literacy mission.
The document discusses web scale discovery tools and their relationship to information literacy. It provides context on the social, economic, technological, and political factors driving adoption of these tools. It then examines perceptions of libraries and describes various commercial and open source discovery services. Desired features of discovery services are outlined. Early reports suggest discovery tools have increased usage of licensed resources but students struggle to interpret results. This raises implications for information literacy support. Challenges around balancing convenience with developing research skills are debated. The document concludes by posing four questions around how discovery tools can support information literacy goals.
Libraries are rapidly changing and expanding to web-based delivery of content and related access services to cater the information needs and expectations of their modern users.
One approach is to design and develop multi tired architectures that include an integration layer providing programme level services for user level applications such as a portal.
The library portal is a tool to organize information resources and services in a way that supports the users’ needs.
LIS professionals should be aware about portal technology, its applications in academics and usability of the portal which is based on effective content management system.
Digital libraries are collections of documents available electronically over the internet or CD-ROM. This document discusses digital libraries, their components and applications. It summarizes three research papers on digital libraries: 1) A new framework for building digital library collections that redesigns the Greenstone digital library system. 2) Rich interactions in digital libraries that aims to increase interaction between users and information. 3) Comprehensive personalized information access in an educational digital library that utilizes techniques like information retrieval, filtering, browsing and visualization.
Similar to K3 edith falk_discoverytoolslibrary (20)
The National Library of Israel is using international standards like IIIF and LD to provide open access to digital reproductions and metadata through graph databases and discovery of entities. They are developing apps using MediaWiki and cooperating with Wikimedia Israel to enrich Wikidata with NLI data. The NLI is also working with The Public Workshop NGO, generating sitemaps to improve search engine discovery of its data repository, launching a developers website, and analyzing data access and usage to improve its internet presence.
G12 susan hazan_roundtableopenaccesjewishevaminerva
Susan Hazan, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, Harvard
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
G12 susan hazan_roundtableopenaccesjewishevaminerva
Susan Hazan, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem, Harvard
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Alex Valdman, The Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People and the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Jewish Documentary Heritage Online: The Yerusha Project at the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Alex Valdman, The Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People and the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Jewish Documentary Heritage Online: The Yerusha Project at the Central Archives for the History of the Jewish People
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Ronit Gadish and Alexander Vainer, The Academy of the Hebrew Language
Hebrew Terminology: Presentation of Data and Technological Challenges
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Ronit Gadish and Alexander Vainer, The Academy of the Hebrew Language
Hebrew Terminology: Presentation of Data and Technological Challenges
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Edwin Seroussi and Josef Sprinzak, Da'at Hamakom Center for the Study of Cultures of Place in Jewish Modernity, The Hebrew University
Mapping Jewish Culture in Time and Place: The Interactive Map of Da'at Hamakom
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Edwin Seroussi and Josef Sprinzak, Da'at Hamakom Center for the Study of Cultures of Place in Jewish Modernity, The Hebrew University
Mapping Jewish Culture in Time and Place: The Interactive Map of Da'at Hamakom
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Menachem Katz, The Open University of Israel, The Friedberg Jewish Manuscript Society
Hillel Gershuni, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Friedberg Jewish Manuscript Society
Categorization of Textual Variants in Digital Synopses and its Research Potential
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Menachem Katz, The Open University of Israel, The Friedberg Jewish Manuscript Society
Hillel Gershuni, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Friedberg Jewish Manuscript Society
Categorization of Textual Variants in Digital Synopses and its Research Potential
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Jonathan Ben-Dov, University of Haifa
Scripta Qumranica Electronica: Dead Sea Scrolls Aggregated Database and Virtual Research Environment
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Oren Ableman and Orit Rosengarten, Israel Antiquities Authority
The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library: Digitizing and Cataloging the Dead Sea Scrolls
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Oren Ableman and Orit Rosengarten, Israel Antiquities Authority
The Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library: Digitizing and Cataloging the Dead Sea Scrolls
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Daniel Stoeckl ben Ezra, EPHE, Sorbonne, France
Hayim Lapin, University of Maryland, US
Building the Next Generation of Resources for Cultural Heritage Digital Texts: Mishna and Tosefta
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Daniel Stoeckl ben Ezra, EPHE, Sorbonne, France
Hayim Lapin, University of Maryland, US
Building the Next Generation of Resources for Cultural Heritage Digital Texts: Mishna and Tosefta
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Michael Satlow, Brown University
Inscriptions of Israel/Palestine: A Digital Project
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Michael Satlow, Brown University
Inscriptions of Israel/Palestine: A Digital Project
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Sigal Arie-Erez, Director, Cataloguing Department, Archives Division, Yad Vashem
Reconnecting the Past: How to Link Archival Descriptions – the EHRI Portal Model
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Sigal Arie-Erez, Director, Cataloguing Department, Archives Division, Yad Vashem
Reconnecting the Past: How to Link Archival Descriptions – the EHRI Portal Model
2016 EVA/Minerva Jerusalem International Conference on Digitisation of Cultural Heritage
http://2016.minervaisrael.org.il
http://www.digital-heritage.org.il
Discover the benefits of outsourcing SEO to Indiadavidjhones387
"Discover the benefits of outsourcing SEO to India! From cost-effective services and expert professionals to round-the-clock work advantages, learn how your business can achieve digital success with Indian SEO solutions.
HijackLoader Evolution: Interactive Process HollowingDonato Onofri
CrowdStrike researchers have identified a HijackLoader (aka IDAT Loader) sample that employs sophisticated evasion techniques to enhance the complexity of the threat. HijackLoader, an increasingly popular tool among adversaries for deploying additional payloads and tooling, continues to evolve as its developers experiment and enhance its capabilities.
In their analysis of a recent HijackLoader sample, CrowdStrike researchers discovered new techniques designed to increase the defense evasion capabilities of the loader. The malware developer used a standard process hollowing technique coupled with an additional trigger that was activated by the parent process writing to a pipe. This new approach, called "Interactive Process Hollowing", has the potential to make defense evasion stealthier.
Ready to Unlock the Power of Blockchain!Toptal Tech
Imagine a world where data flows freely, yet remains secure. A world where trust is built into the fabric of every transaction. This is the promise of blockchain, a revolutionary technology poised to reshape our digital landscape.
Toptal Tech is at the forefront of this innovation, connecting you with the brightest minds in blockchain development. Together, we can unlock the potential of this transformative technology, building a future of transparency, security, and endless possibilities.
Gen Z and the marketplaces - let's translate their needsLaura Szabó
The product workshop focused on exploring the requirements of Generation Z in relation to marketplace dynamics. We delved into their specific needs, examined the specifics in their shopping preferences, and analyzed their preferred methods for accessing information and making purchases within a marketplace. Through the study of real-life cases , we tried to gain valuable insights into enhancing the marketplace experience for Generation Z.
The workshop was held on the DMA Conference in Vienna June 2024.
1. Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries: why, what and how?
Edith Falk
Chef Librarian
The Hebrew University Library Authority
2.
3. Why not
•It is free
•It is user friendly
•It includes scientific resources and even “gray” literature
•It allows simultaneous search in many resources
•It allows saving in a private e-shelf and creating a bibliography
•It shows citations and other parameters
•It searches the full text
•It links to the catalog of your local library
•
4. למה לא ?
It is difficult to determine with 100% accuracy all that Google Scholar searches.
•Google cannot:
–Sort/search by disciplinary field
–Browse by title
–Limit search results
–Search the deep web
•There are not enough possibilities to deal with the results
•No access to the indexing of the
databases.
•No access to the algorythm
6. Why not a federated search?
•Federated search is an information retrieval technology that allows the simultaneous search of multiple searchable resources. A user makes a single query request which is distributed to the search engines participating in the federation.
•Marshall Breeding in 2005, “…shortly after the launch of Google Scholar posits that federated search could not compete the power and speed of a tool like Google Scholar. He proclaims the need for, as he describes it, a “centralized search model”.
•Chickering, F. William and Yang, Sharon Q. (2014). “Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: an update”. Information technology and libraries, 33(2): 5-30.
7. What are we looking for?
•A Google-like tool, simple and efficient
•A tool that allows searching as many resources as possible, while allowing limiting the searches to resources accessible to library patrons
•A tool that allows dealing with the list of searches in as many ways as possible
11. The Central Index
•The collection of preharvested and processed metadata and full text that comprises the searchable content of a WSD service: Central indexes typically include full text and citations from publishers; full text and metadata from open source collections; full text, abstracting, and indexing from aggregators and subscription databases; and MARC from library catalogs; also called the base index, unified index, or foundation index.
12.
13. Evaluating the Central Index
•parameters:
–scope of the content,
– item types,
– inclusion of the full text
–richness of the metadata.
•The central index has to fit the library collections on one hand and the type of users of the library on the other hand.
•Some databases are not included in any WSD (for example: Scifinder)
•Some databases are included in some WSD and not in others (especially Proquest and Ebsco)
•Even when a WSD vendor does not include a database, it may have basic, citation- level metadata for journal titles by a certain publisher (Elsevier or Springer).
14. The Discovery Layer
•Single search across the central index
•Fast response time
•Relevancy-ranked results list
•Facets, sort, and other tools for refining and using the results
•Connections to full text via direct links and OpenURL
•End-user accounts and features
17. or side by side… Hebrew University (Vufind and EDS)
18. Discovery Tools Providers
Content Providers
Software Providers
•Ex-Libris - Primo Central
•OCLC - World Cat
•EBSCO - EDS
•Proquest - Summon
19. Open Discovery Initiative: promoting transparency
O.D.I.
•Create ways for libraries to assess the level of content providers’ participation in discovery services
•Help streamline the process by which content providers work with discovery service vendors
• Define models for fair or unbiased linking from discovery services to publishers’ content
•Determine what usage statistics should be collected
NISO, the National Information Standards Organization, a non-profit association accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), is where content publishers, libraries, and software developers turn for information industry standards that allow them to work together. Through NISO, all of these communities are able to collaborate on mutually accepted standards — solutions that enhance their operations today and form a foundation for the future
20. Thank you for
your attention!
Edith Falk,Chief Librarian
Hebrew University of Jerusalem