This document provides an overview of APA style guidelines for in-text citations and reference lists. It explains that APA style is typically used in social sciences and requires brief in-text citations with the author's last name and year, as well as a reference list on a separate page with full source details. The document demonstrates proper formatting for various citation scenarios and reference list entries for different source types such as books, journal articles, websites, and more.
Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography .docxjoellemurphey
Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography
Adapted by J. Lynch-Greenberg from a handout created by Susan Roach in Summer 2013
The following submissions will be required:
The proposal, which must be typed, is due on Day 1 of Week 7 (Oct. 6), including
the following:
o Your intended topic and why you are interested in writing about it
o Your subject-matter question (SMQ)
o At least two pieces of significant research regarding your topic, listed in
MLA Works Cited format, with at least one of them in annotated
bibliography form
The first draft (ideally, three copies) of the Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with
Annotated Bibliography for peer review on Day 1 of Week 9 (Oct. 20)
The second draft (a clean copy) of the Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with
Annotated Bibliography for instructor review on Day 2 of Week 10 (Oct. 29)
The final draft of the Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography for
a grade on Day 2 of Week 13 (Nov. 19)
The Rhetorical Analysis of a Text should be focused on one academic journal
article or an article in an anthology (a book with a collection of related essays).
You will need to add a couple of additional sources to show you’ve thoroughly
researched your topic. For the more detailed analysis, you should choose an article
you are considering for use in your Position Essay (a persuasive paper you’ll write
later in the semester). The goal of this paper is to assure you can carefully evaluate a
source and to illustrate your ability to do academic research.
Here is a sample outline of the essay, which I suggest using:
I. Introduction
a. Identify the author, text, and original source
b. Identify the overall topic being discussed
c. Make a claim about the effectiveness of the text (as your thesis)
II. Body
a. A brief summary of the article, in which you identify the author’s thesis,
purpose of the original text, and overall message
b. Explain the context of the article
i. Why was it written?
ii. To what issue/event/idea is the author responding (you may
actually need to incorporate other research to discuss this)
iii. Why is this text significant
c. What are the author’s credentials (what is his/her ethos appeal)?
d. Who is the (original) audience of the article?
i. Where was this article originally published? Who reads this type of
journal or anthology?
ii. Is the author part of the group to which this piece was written? How
so (or, why not)?
e. What is the voice of the article?
Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography
Adapted by J. Lynch-Greenberg from a handout created by Susan Roach in Summer 2013
i. What language choices does the author make? Is jargon used? If
so, is it explained?
ii. How formal is the article? Is it in first, second, or third person? Why
do you think this is so? What genre is this written in? How do you
think this has influenced the way the article is written (if i ...
Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography .docxjoellemurphey
Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography
Adapted by J. Lynch-Greenberg from a handout created by Susan Roach in Summer 2013
The following submissions will be required:
The proposal, which must be typed, is due on Day 1 of Week 7 (Oct. 6), including
the following:
o Your intended topic and why you are interested in writing about it
o Your subject-matter question (SMQ)
o At least two pieces of significant research regarding your topic, listed in
MLA Works Cited format, with at least one of them in annotated
bibliography form
The first draft (ideally, three copies) of the Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with
Annotated Bibliography for peer review on Day 1 of Week 9 (Oct. 20)
The second draft (a clean copy) of the Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with
Annotated Bibliography for instructor review on Day 2 of Week 10 (Oct. 29)
The final draft of the Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography for
a grade on Day 2 of Week 13 (Nov. 19)
The Rhetorical Analysis of a Text should be focused on one academic journal
article or an article in an anthology (a book with a collection of related essays).
You will need to add a couple of additional sources to show you’ve thoroughly
researched your topic. For the more detailed analysis, you should choose an article
you are considering for use in your Position Essay (a persuasive paper you’ll write
later in the semester). The goal of this paper is to assure you can carefully evaluate a
source and to illustrate your ability to do academic research.
Here is a sample outline of the essay, which I suggest using:
I. Introduction
a. Identify the author, text, and original source
b. Identify the overall topic being discussed
c. Make a claim about the effectiveness of the text (as your thesis)
II. Body
a. A brief summary of the article, in which you identify the author’s thesis,
purpose of the original text, and overall message
b. Explain the context of the article
i. Why was it written?
ii. To what issue/event/idea is the author responding (you may
actually need to incorporate other research to discuss this)
iii. Why is this text significant
c. What are the author’s credentials (what is his/her ethos appeal)?
d. Who is the (original) audience of the article?
i. Where was this article originally published? Who reads this type of
journal or anthology?
ii. Is the author part of the group to which this piece was written? How
so (or, why not)?
e. What is the voice of the article?
Rhetorical Analysis of a Text with Annotated Bibliography
Adapted by J. Lynch-Greenberg from a handout created by Susan Roach in Summer 2013
i. What language choices does the author make? Is jargon used? If
so, is it explained?
ii. How formal is the article? Is it in first, second, or third person? Why
do you think this is so? What genre is this written in? How do you
think this has influenced the way the article is written (if i ...
Rubric For The Evaluation Of Studying Religion” PaperCRITERIA.docxSUBHI7
Rubric For The Evaluation Of “Studying Religion” Paper
CRITERIA
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Minimum Points
SATISFACTORY
Medium Points
EXCEPTIONAL
Maximum Points
CONTENT
(6 Points)
Write a 750- to 1,050-word paper that addresses the following topics:
· What is essential (in the practices and beliefs) for a tradition to be called a religion?
· Illustrate your points by referring to the commonalities of the three Western religions.
· How do different fields of study approach religion?
· What are some critical issues in the academic study of religion?
The writer does not demonstrate cursory understanding of subject matter, and the purpose of the paper is not stated. The objective, therefore, is not addressed and supporting materials are not correctly referenced.
0 to 2.4 points
The writer demonstrates limited understanding of the subject matter in that theories are not well connected to a practical experience or appropriate examples, though the attempt to research the topic is evident, and materials are correctly referenced.
2.5 to 5.4 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter by clearly stating the objective of the paper and links theories to practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that is correctly referenced, and this material fulfills the objective of the paper.
5.5 to 7 points
Comments on Content
? of 7 points
You have fulfilled all/most/some of the objectives of the assignment with this ___ word paper. You had a section on …
ORGANIZATION
( 2 Points)
Paragraphs do not focus around a central point, and concepts are disjointedly introduced or poorly defended (i.e., stream of consciousness). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. There is no introduction or conclusion.
0 to .5 points
Topics/content could be organized in a more logical manner. Transitions from one idea to the next are often disconnected and uneven. The introduction does not give clear direction and the conclusion does not restate the main points and show how they explain the big idea.
Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Ideas may be overstated, and sentences with limited contribution to the subject are included.
.6 to 1 points
The writer focuses on ideas and concepts within paragraphs, and sentences are well-connected and meaningful. Each topic logically follows the objective. The introduction clearly states the objective or ideas leading to the purpose of the paper, and a conclusion draws the ideas together.
The reading audience is correctly identified, demonstrated by appropriate language usage (i.e., avoiding jargon and simplifying complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.
1.1 to 1.5 points
Comments on Organization
? of 1.5 points
You do/do not have a clear organizational flow. You do/do no ...
This session describes the basics of scientific writing. Initially, we discussed about the overview, bias language, manuscript structure, publishing manuals with comparisions, search engines, quality of journals, impact factors, reputed publishers, and interactive practical session on in-text citation and reference list preparation.
Overview Students will write a brief research review (5-7 pages.docxgerardkortney
Overview: Students will write a brief research review (5-7 pages double spaced) on a topic of their choosing, so long as it relates directly to Cognitive Psychology. This review must include a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed research articles. The paper is due on Friday, December 8th.
Topics
Perception
Attention
Memory
Knowledge
Language
Decision Making
Final Paper
Example Topics:
To what degree are cognitive processes shared across music and language?
What are the types of cognitive processes that contribute to creating false memories?
What are the best study strategies for doing well in a college course?
*Must write topic in your own words, don’t plagiarize these examples*
Topic
Address your topic using peer reviewed research articles.
Articles that contain research experiments
Review articles cannot be included in these 5, but can use review article as an additional source
Where to find articles? PsycInfo
Peer reviewed Research
Summarize the articles in your paper.
What did the researchers do (i.e. methods)? What did they find (i.e. results)? What does this tell us about your topic?
Connect articles to make an argument.
How do these articles inform one another, and the topic at large?
Example *Published* Review paper: Peretz, Vuvan, Lagrois, & Armony (2016)
Not the same expectation for the final paper, but gives you a sense of structure for a review paper.
Peer reviewed Research
Plagiarism
Everything must be in your own words
Refrain from using direct quotes
Third person point of view/ formal writing
Do not use contractions (e.g. don’t, can’t)
12 point font, Times New Roman, double spaced
Paper mechanics
What is it?
American Psychological Association (APA) style
A writing style used in the social sciences
Used to cite sources.
Why is it important?
Need to give credit to authors who developed original ideas
If these are not your own ideas, need to cite!
Otherwise, you are plagiarizing
Also lets reader know what works you are referring to
Reduces ambiguity
APA Format
How to use it?
In text citations:
When you refer to author’s name(s) within a sentence:
According to Jones (1998), APA style is a difficult citation format for first-time learners.
When you don’t refer to author’s name(s) within a sentence, but you refer to their ideas.
APA style is a difficult citation format for first-time learners (Jones, 1998).
APA Format
Multiple authors:
2 authors
Research by Wegener and Petty (1994) supports...
(Wegener & Petty, 1994)
3 to 5 authors
Research by Kernis and colleagues (1993) supports
(Kernis, Cornell, Sun, Berry, & Harlow, 1993) (Kernis et al., 1993)
6 or more authors
Harris et al. (2001) argued...
(Harris et al., 2001)
APA Format
References
Need to include a reference list
Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10.
Use hanging paragraph
Author(s): Last name and then initials.
Date
Title: Only first .
Academic Writing – Using and citing sources of ideas, Article, Report, Case, proposal writing, Group Discussions, Software for learning to assess similarities/originality with other texts/papers/reports.
Rubric For The Evaluation Of Studying Religion” PaperCRITERIA.docxSUBHI7
Rubric For The Evaluation Of “Studying Religion” Paper
CRITERIA
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Minimum Points
SATISFACTORY
Medium Points
EXCEPTIONAL
Maximum Points
CONTENT
(6 Points)
Write a 750- to 1,050-word paper that addresses the following topics:
· What is essential (in the practices and beliefs) for a tradition to be called a religion?
· Illustrate your points by referring to the commonalities of the three Western religions.
· How do different fields of study approach religion?
· What are some critical issues in the academic study of religion?
The writer does not demonstrate cursory understanding of subject matter, and the purpose of the paper is not stated. The objective, therefore, is not addressed and supporting materials are not correctly referenced.
0 to 2.4 points
The writer demonstrates limited understanding of the subject matter in that theories are not well connected to a practical experience or appropriate examples, though the attempt to research the topic is evident, and materials are correctly referenced.
2.5 to 5.4 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter by clearly stating the objective of the paper and links theories to practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that is correctly referenced, and this material fulfills the objective of the paper.
5.5 to 7 points
Comments on Content
? of 7 points
You have fulfilled all/most/some of the objectives of the assignment with this ___ word paper. You had a section on …
ORGANIZATION
( 2 Points)
Paragraphs do not focus around a central point, and concepts are disjointedly introduced or poorly defended (i.e., stream of consciousness). The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented. There is no introduction or conclusion.
0 to .5 points
Topics/content could be organized in a more logical manner. Transitions from one idea to the next are often disconnected and uneven. The introduction does not give clear direction and the conclusion does not restate the main points and show how they explain the big idea.
Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Ideas may be overstated, and sentences with limited contribution to the subject are included.
.6 to 1 points
The writer focuses on ideas and concepts within paragraphs, and sentences are well-connected and meaningful. Each topic logically follows the objective. The introduction clearly states the objective or ideas leading to the purpose of the paper, and a conclusion draws the ideas together.
The reading audience is correctly identified, demonstrated by appropriate language usage (i.e., avoiding jargon and simplifying complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.
1.1 to 1.5 points
Comments on Organization
? of 1.5 points
You do/do not have a clear organizational flow. You do/do no ...
This session describes the basics of scientific writing. Initially, we discussed about the overview, bias language, manuscript structure, publishing manuals with comparisions, search engines, quality of journals, impact factors, reputed publishers, and interactive practical session on in-text citation and reference list preparation.
Overview Students will write a brief research review (5-7 pages.docxgerardkortney
Overview: Students will write a brief research review (5-7 pages double spaced) on a topic of their choosing, so long as it relates directly to Cognitive Psychology. This review must include a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed research articles. The paper is due on Friday, December 8th.
Topics
Perception
Attention
Memory
Knowledge
Language
Decision Making
Final Paper
Example Topics:
To what degree are cognitive processes shared across music and language?
What are the types of cognitive processes that contribute to creating false memories?
What are the best study strategies for doing well in a college course?
*Must write topic in your own words, don’t plagiarize these examples*
Topic
Address your topic using peer reviewed research articles.
Articles that contain research experiments
Review articles cannot be included in these 5, but can use review article as an additional source
Where to find articles? PsycInfo
Peer reviewed Research
Summarize the articles in your paper.
What did the researchers do (i.e. methods)? What did they find (i.e. results)? What does this tell us about your topic?
Connect articles to make an argument.
How do these articles inform one another, and the topic at large?
Example *Published* Review paper: Peretz, Vuvan, Lagrois, & Armony (2016)
Not the same expectation for the final paper, but gives you a sense of structure for a review paper.
Peer reviewed Research
Plagiarism
Everything must be in your own words
Refrain from using direct quotes
Third person point of view/ formal writing
Do not use contractions (e.g. don’t, can’t)
12 point font, Times New Roman, double spaced
Paper mechanics
What is it?
American Psychological Association (APA) style
A writing style used in the social sciences
Used to cite sources.
Why is it important?
Need to give credit to authors who developed original ideas
If these are not your own ideas, need to cite!
Otherwise, you are plagiarizing
Also lets reader know what works you are referring to
Reduces ambiguity
APA Format
How to use it?
In text citations:
When you refer to author’s name(s) within a sentence:
According to Jones (1998), APA style is a difficult citation format for first-time learners.
When you don’t refer to author’s name(s) within a sentence, but you refer to their ideas.
APA style is a difficult citation format for first-time learners (Jones, 1998).
APA Format
Multiple authors:
2 authors
Research by Wegener and Petty (1994) supports...
(Wegener & Petty, 1994)
3 to 5 authors
Research by Kernis and colleagues (1993) supports
(Kernis, Cornell, Sun, Berry, & Harlow, 1993) (Kernis et al., 1993)
6 or more authors
Harris et al. (2001) argued...
(Harris et al., 2001)
APA Format
References
Need to include a reference list
Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10.
Use hanging paragraph
Author(s): Last name and then initials.
Date
Title: Only first .
Academic Writing – Using and citing sources of ideas, Article, Report, Case, proposal writing, Group Discussions, Software for learning to assess similarities/originality with other texts/papers/reports.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
3. Why APA?
Different professions use different manuals
Modern Language Association (MLA)
• English Studies
• Foreign Language and Literatures
American Psychological Association (APA)
• Social Sciences (Psychology, Sociology, Communications, etc.)
• Nursing
Chicago Style
• History
• Arts
• Sciences
4. What does it mean to credit sources?
• Crediting sources gives an author or resource credit for
original information. Crediting sources in your paper
includes two parts:
• In-Text Citations: When you present information in the body of
your paper, you briefly identify its source.
• Reference List: On a separate page at the end of your paper, you
write a detailed list of the sources cited in your paper.
• The in-text citations and reference list should credit the
exact same sources.
5. Why credit sources?
• Acknowledge authors for their ideas
• Avoid plagiarism
• Increase credibility and transparency
• Join an ongoing academic discussion
• Become a part of a professional community
6. What should you credit?
• Any information that you learned from another source
including facts, statistics, opinions, theories, photographs,
and charts
• Credit these sources when you mention their information
in any way (quotations, summaries, paraphrases)
• EXCEPTION: Information that is common knowledge
• Barack Obama is the president of the United States.
• The declaration of independence was signed July 4, 1776.
7. In-Text Citation Format
• An in-text citation usually includes the following information:
• Author’s last name (no first name or initial)
• Publication date (year only—even for electronic sources)
• Page number (required for quotations; optional for paraphrases)
• The rest of the information about the source appears in the reference
list.
8. In-Text Citation Format
When using APA format, the basic in-text citation
contains the author’s last name, the date of
publication, and often the page number from which
material is borrowed.
For Example:
“In order to maintain academic honesty in your writing, it is important to cite
your sources using proper APA style” (Moore, 2013, p. 99).
Author
Date
What should I do when the author has already been referenced?
Moore (2013) says that “In order to maintain academic honesty in your writing,
it is important to cite your sources using proper APA style” (p. 99).
Page
#
9. In-Text Citation Format
Author’s name and publication year at end of sentence
• People with bipolar disorder often have lower wages, higher
unemployment, work absenteeism, reliance on workmen’s
compensation, higher rates of divorce, lower levels of
educational attainment, higher arrest rates, and hospitalization
(Leahy, 2007).
Author’s name in the sentence immediately followed by year
• According to Leahy (2007), people with bipolar disorder often
have lower wages, higher unemployment, work absenteeism,
reliance on workmen’s compensation, higher rates of divorce,
lower levels of educational attainment, higher arrest rates, and
hospitalization.
10. In-Text Citations with Quotations (under 40 words)
Author’s name, year, and page number immediately following
quotation
• Genres are “abstract, socially recognized ways of using
language” (Hyland, 2003, p. 21).
Author’s name in the sentence immediately followed by year
Page number immediately following quotation
• According to Hyland (2003), genres are “abstract, socially
recognized ways of using language” (p. 354).
11. In-Text Citations
Basic Author Name in Sentence
When you
summarize or
paraphrase a source
(Leahy, 2007) Leahy (2007)
When you quote a
source
(Hyland, 2003, p. 21) Hyland (2003) “…” (p. 21)
12. Let’s Practice!
Author’s last name: Gee
Year of publication: 2005
Page number: 8
• Another viewpoint is that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Another viewpoint is that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices.”
• The recent theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
• Gee believes that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Gee’s theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
13. Let’s Practice!
Author’s last name: Gee
Year of publication: 2005
Page number: 8
• Another viewpoint is that the meaning of language is inherently social (Gee,
2005).
• Another viewpoint is that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices.”
• The recent theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
• Gee believes that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Gee’s theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
14. Let’s Practice!
Author’s last name: Gee
Year of publication: 2005
Page number: 8
• Another viewpoint is that the meaning of language is inherently social (Gee,
2005).
• Another viewpoint is that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8).
• The recent theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
• Gee believes that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Gee’s theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
15. Let’s Practice!
Author’s last name: Gee
Year of publication: 2005
Page number: 8
• Another viewpoint is that the meaning of language is inherently social (Gee,
2005).
• Another viewpoint is that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8).
• The recent theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8) lends support for social learning theories.
• Gee believes that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Gee’s theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
16. Let’s Practice!
Author’s last name: Gee
Year of publication: 2005
Page number: 8
• Another viewpoint is that the meaning of language is inherently social (Gee,
2005).
• Another viewpoint is that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8).
• The recent theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8) lends support for social learning theories.
• Gee (2005) believes that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Gee’s theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” lends support for social learning theories.
17. Let’s Practice!
Author’s last name: Gee
Year of publication: 2005
Page number: 8
• Another viewpoint is that the meaning of language is inherently social (Gee,
2005).
• Another viewpoint is that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8).
• The recent theory that “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (Gee, 2005, p. 8) lends support for social learning theories.
• Gee (2005) believes that the meaning of language is inherently social.
• Gee’s theory that (2005) “language has meaning only in and through social
practices” (p. 8) lends support for social learning theories.
18. In-Text Citations: Multiple Authors
Basic Author Names in Sentence
2 Authors (Verhaak & de Haan, 2007) Verhaak and de Haan (2007)
3-5 Authors first citation
(Zandt, Prior, & Kyrios, 2006)
subsequent citations
(Zandt et al., 2006)
first citation
Zandt, Prior, and Kyrios (2006)
subsequent citations
Zandt et al. (2006)
6+ Authors (Storch et al., 2006) Storch et al. (2006)
19. In-Text Citations: Other Variations
Basic Author Name(s) in Sentence
Group as
Author
(University of Pittsburgh, 2007) University of Pittsburgh (2007)
No Author (“Study Finds,” 2007)
(College Bound Seniors, 2008)
“Study Finds” (2007)
College Bound Seniors (2008)
No
Publication
Date
(Basham, n.d.) Basham (n.d.)
Multiple
Pages
(Gee, 2005, pp. 8-9) Gee (2007)…(pp. 8-9)
No Page
Numbers
(Brown, 2007, para. 6) Brown (2007)…(para. 6)
20. In-Text Citations: Other Variations
Basic Author Name(s) in Sentence
Two primary
authors with the
same last name
(M. Light, 2008)
(L. Light, 2006)
M. Light (2008)
L. Light (2006)
Multiple works
by the same
author in the
same year
(Derryberry & Reed, 2005a)
(Derryberry & Reed, 2005b)
Derryberry & Reed (2005a)
Derryberry & Reed (2005b)
Multiple works
by the same
author in the
same citation
(Gogel, 1990, 2006) Gogel (1990, 2006)
Multiple works
by different
authors in the
same citation
(Minor, 1999; Shafranske &
Mahoney, 1998)
N/A
22. Books
• Rule: Author(s) of book – family name and initials, use & for multiple
authors. (Year of publication).Title of book – italicised. Place of
publication: Publisher.
• One author: Berkman, R. I. (1994).Find it fast: How to uncover expert
information.New York: Harper Perrenial.
• Two to six authors: Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (1991).Brain sex: the real
difference between men and women. London: Mandarin.
• Six or more authors: Johnson, L., Lewis, K., Peters, M., Harris, Y.,
Moreton, G., Morgan, B. et al. (2005).How far Is far? London: McMillan.
• No author: The CCH Macquarie dictionary of business.(1993). North
Ryde, NSW: CCH Australia.
• Book by an organisation or institution (corporate author):
Queensland Health. (2002).Best practice guidelines for
the management of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents.
Brisbane, Qld.: Queensland Health.
23. Journal Articles
• Rule: Author(s) of journal article – family name and
initials, use & for multiple authors. (Year of publication).
Title of journal article.Journal name – italicised, Volume –
italicised (Issue or number), Page number(s).
• Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of
consequences.Psychological Bulletin, 50(2), 49-52.
• Skenderian, J, Siegel, J. T.,Crano, W.D., Alvaro, E.E. &
Lac, A. (2008). Expectancychange and adolescents'
intentions to use marijuana.Psychology of Addictive
Behaviors,22, 563-569.
24. Conference papers
• Rule: Author(s) of paper – family name and initials, use & for
multiple authors. (Year of publication). Title of paper. Title of
published proceeding – italicised. Place of Publication:
Publisher.
• Published conference paper: Bohrer, S., Zielke, T., &
Freiburg, V. (1995). Integrated obstacle detection framework for
intelligent cruise control on motorways.Paper presented at
IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Detroit, MI: Piscataway.
• Unpublished conference paper: Bowden, F.J. & Fairley, C.K.
(1996, June).Endemic STDs in
the Northern Territory: estimations of effective rates of partner
change. Paper presented at the scientific meeting of the Royal
Australian College of Physicians, Darwin.
25. Webpages
• Rule: Author(s) of page – person or organisation, use & for
multiple authors. (Year page created or revised).Title of page –
italicised. Retrieved month day, year of retrieval, from web
address.
• Web page - with author: Atherton, J. (2005).Behaviour
Modification. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from
http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/
behaviour_mod.htm
• Web page - no author: Behaviour modification. (2007).
Retrieved February 5, 2009, from
http://www.educationalpsychologist.org.uk/behaviour.html.
• Webpage – no date: Society of Clinical Psychology.
(n.d.)About Clinical Psychology. Retrieved January 28, 2009,
from http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/ aboutcp.html
26. Rules of Thumb A Writer’s Reference
Gavilan College Writing Center