MBBS, FCPS, MD, FACC, FESC, FRCP, FSCAI,
FCCP,FAPSC, FAPSIC, FAHA,FACP,FASE
Professor and Head of Cardiology
Colonel Malek Medical College , Manikganj.
For post-graduates
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com16/8/2019
Post graduate version 2019
Case report
• A 53 years old gentleman presented with shortness
of breath on exertion for last 2 years , increasing in
intensity for last 3 months. On examination he is
dysnoeic, pulse-128/min, irregular, BP-100/30 mm
Hg, RR-32/min, diastolic thrill in apex, mid-diastolic
murmur in apical area, early diastolic murmur in left
lower sternal area and systolic murmur in aortic
area. ECG- Atrial Fibrillation, CXR-P/A view-
Cardiomegaly, Echocardiogram-severe mitral
stenosis with Moderate AS with severe AR with
moderate pulmonary hypertension. Patient
underwent DVR and he is doing well.
8/18/2019
Col. Malek Medical College, Manikganj
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
2
Normal valve function
•Maintain forward flow and prevent
reversal of flow.
•Valves open and close in response to
pressure differences (gradients) between
cardiac chambers.
drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
Abnormal valve function
•Valve Stenosis
•Obstruction to valve flow during that phase of the
cardiac cycle when the valve is normally open.
•Hemodynamic hallmark -“pressure gradient”
•Valve Regurgitation, insufficiency, incompetence
•Inadequate valve closure → reverse flow of the blood,
back leakage
•Combined – a single valve can be both stenotic and
regurgitant; combinations of valve lesions can coexist
•Single disease process
•Different disease processes
•One valve lesion may cause another
•Certain combinations are particularly common(AS & MR,
MS & TR)
drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
Essential questions in the evaluation of
patients for valvular intervention
Diagnosis
• History
• Physical examination
• ECG
• Chest x-ray
• Echocardiography
• Invasive evaluation, CT,
MRI
History
•Other known heart diseses
• Congenital heart disease,
bicuspid aortic valve
• Ischemic heart disease
• Rheumatic fever
• Hypertrophic/dilated
cardiomyopathy
• Aortic diseases –
Marfans,Ehlers-Danlos
History
• Generally: symptoms of heart failure
and low cardiac output
• Breathlessness
• Chest pain or dyscomfort
• Syncope
• Fatigue
• Peripheral or pulmonary oedema
• Palpitations
drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
Physical examination
• MURMURS!!!
• Periferal oedema
• Lung crackles
• Elevated JVP
• Displaced apex beat,
irregular heart beat…
Hundreds of eponymous signs from past
millenium (↓importance in daily
routine, ↑importance for passing exam)
Heart murmurs
•Sounds produces by turbulent
blood flow (in valve diseseses,
artery stenosis, abnormal
chamber or AVcommunication)
•Localization,grade,
propagation, timing, quality
Heart murmurs
Intensity Description
Grade I/VI Barely audible
Grade II/VI Audible, but soft
Grade III/VI Easily audible
Grade IV/VI Easily audible, associated with a thrill
Grade V/VI Easily audible, associated with a thrill, and still audible with the
stethoscope onlylightly on the chest
Grade VI/VI Easily audible, associated with a thrill, and still audible with the
stethoscope off of the chest
drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
ECG
• Not specific
• Findings might be caused or altered by other
concomitant heart disease (hypertensive heart
disease, ischemic heart disease)
• Left ventricular hypertrophy (aortic valve
disease)
• Left atrial enlargement (mainy MS, but any left
heart valve disease)
• Atrial fibrilation
• Bundle branch block
• Arrytmias (atrial fibrilation, ectopic beats)
Chest x-ray in valvular disease
• Different heart shapes in different valvular
heart diseses, ↓specificity, ↓significance
• Cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion
• Widened mediastinum
• Valve calcifications, prosthetic valves
Echocardiography
• Mainstay of valve disease
diagnosis and follow-up
• Allows real-time measurement of
chamber and wall diameters,
ejection fraction assessment and
functional valve evaluation
• Easily avaiable and repeated
• Essential in acute valve disease
diagnosis
• No radiation harm
• Trans-esophageal echocardiography
avaiable for patients with poor
transthoracic sonographic window
Invasive evaluation, CT, MRI
• Methods usualy used for uncertain cases or repeat
cardiac surgery / percutaneous inteventions planning
• Angiography to assess regurgitation severity – direct
transcatheter contrast medium administration into
heart chambers – aortography, ventriculography
• Hemodynamic measurment – measuring of
intracardial pressures and gradients
• CT aortography – method of choice in aortic
dissection diagnosis
• CMRI – very precise evaluation of cardiac tissues and
function, but expensive, low avaiability, long
examination time
drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
Echocardiographic criteria for the definition of
severe valve regurgitation: an integrative approach
Aortic regurgitation
• Causes
• Chronic aortic regurgitation
• Bicuspid aortic valve
• Rheumatic and degenerative – always with some
degree of stenosis
• Aortic root dilation (hypertension, Marfan’s,
Ehlers-Danlos, syphylitic aortopathy)
• Other rare causes (SLE, RA)
• Acute aortic regurgiation
• Infective endocarditis
• Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
Aortic regurgitation
• Pathophysiology of chronic aortic regrgitation
• Leakage of blood into LV during diastole due
to ineffective coaptation of the aortic cusps
• Combined pressure and volume overload
• Compensatory Mechanisms: LV dilation, LVH.
Progressive dilation leads to heart failure
• Greatest mass of myocardium in any valve
disease – „cor bovinum“ – over 500g
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
• Presentation
• Dyspnea: exertional, orthopnea,
and paroxsymal nocturnal
dyspnea
• Chest pain
• Fatigue
• Palpitations: due to increased
force of contraction or arrythmias
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
•Physical findings (the ones you might find)
• Diastolic blowing murmur at the left sternal border –
might be very discrete. Systolic ejection murmur might
be present due to increased blood flow across the
aortic valve of concomitant valve stenosis
• Wide pulse pressure – caused by diastolic
regurgitation of blood to LV and fast decrease of
diastolic BP – „Corrigan’s pulse“ (160/30 mmHg…)
• Heaving and laterally displaced apex beat – due to
dilated heart with giant stroke volume
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
•Physical findings (the ones you might not find…)
• Quincke’s sign - pulsations of nail bed
• Muller’s sign - pulsation of uvula
• De Musset sign - (head nodding in time with
the heart beat)
• Duroziez sign (systolic and diastolic murmurs
heard over the femoral artery when it is
gradually compressed with the stethoscope)
• Austin Flint murmur (apex): Regurgitant jet
impinges on anterior MVL causing it to vibrate
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
Echocardiographic Evaluation
Assessment of valve morphology: tricuspid, bicuspid,
unicuspid or quadricuspid valve.
• Determination of the direction of the aortic regurgitation jet
in the long-axis view (central or eccentric) and its origin in the
short-axis view (central or commissural).
• Identification of the mechanism, following the same
principle as for mitral regurgitation: normal cusps but
insufficient coaptation due to dilatation of the aortic root
with central jet (type 1), cusp prolapse with eccentric jet (type
2) or retraction with poor cusp tissue quality and large central
or eccentric jet (type 3).
Aortic regurgitation
Echocardiographic Evaluation
• Quantification of aortic regurgitation should follow an
integrated approach considering all qualitative, semi-
quantitative and quantitative parameters.
• Measurement of LV function and dimensions. Indexing LV
diameters for body surface area (BSA) is recommended in
patients with small body size (BSA <1.68 m2).
• New parameters obtained by three-dimensional (3D)
echocardiography, tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging
may be useful, particularly in patients with borderline left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), where they may help in
the decision for surgery.
Aortic regurgitation
Echocardiographic Evaluation
• Measurement of the aortic root and ascending aorta in the 2-
dimensional (2D) mode at four levels: annulus, sinuses of
Valsalva, sinotubular junction and tubular ascending aorta.
Measurements are taken in the parasternal long-axis view from
leading edge to leading edge at end diastole, except for the aortic
annulus, which is measured in mid systole.
• As it will have surgical consequences, it is important to
differentiate three phenotypes of the ascending aorta: aortic
root aneurysms (sinuses of Valsalva >45mm), tubular ascending
aneurysm (sinuses of Valsalva <40– 45mm) and isolated aortic
regurgitation (all diameters <40mm). The calculation of
indexed values has been recommended to account for body
size.
Aortic regurgitation
Echocardiographic Evaluation
• Definition of the anatomy of the aortic valve
cusps and assessment of valve reparability
should be provided by preoperative TOE if aortic
valve repair or a valve-sparing surgery of the
aortic root is considered.
• Intraoperative evaluation of the surgical result
by TOE is mandatory in patients in whom the
aortic valve is preserved or repaired in the
procedure.
Aortic regurgitation
• Acute aortic regurgitation
• Caused by a leaflet perforation in infective
endocarditis
• In aortic dissection due to a change in aortic root
geometry – dilation, extensive intimal tear with
prolapse into LVOT and coaptation impairment
• Presentation of acute aortic regurgitation itself is
usually a pulmonary oedema accompanied by
symptoms of the causing pathology
• True emergency – mostly requires immediate cardiac
surgery
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
Aortic regurgitation
Therapy –surgical
• Isolated leaflet pathology - aortic valve
replacement
• Aortic root pathology - combined aortic
root, ascendent aorta and aortic valve
replacement – Bentall’s procedure
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
Aortic regurgitation
Indication for replacement
• Severe aortic regurgitation (EROA – effective
regurgitant orifice area >0,3 cm2)
• Symptomatic
• LV dilates (over 50 mm EDD) or function
decreases (EF < 55%)
• Other indication for surgery
• Acute
• Moderate regurgitation (AVA 1,5-1 cm2 )
• With other indication for surgery
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
Target INR for mechanical prostheses
drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
Recommended requirements of a heart valve Centre
The evaluation of aortic regurgitation requires consideration of
valve morphology and the mechanism and severity of regurgitation,
including careful assessment of aortic dilatation.
• In asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation, careful
follow-up of symptomatic status and LV size and function is
mandatory.
• The strongest indication for valve surgery is the presence of
symptoms (spontaneous or on exercise testing) and/or the
documentation of LVEF <50% and/or end-systolic diameter >50 mm.
• In patients with a dilated aorta, definition of the aortic pathology
and accurate measurements of aortic diameters are crucial to guide the
timing and type of surgery.
• Aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic surgery instead of
aortic valve replacement should be considered in selected cases in
experienced centres.
Aortic regurgitation
drtoufiq1971@gmail.com

Aortic regurgitation for post graduates

  • 1.
    MBBS, FCPS, MD,FACC, FESC, FRCP, FSCAI, FCCP,FAPSC, FAPSIC, FAHA,FACP,FASE Professor and Head of Cardiology Colonel Malek Medical College , Manikganj. For post-graduates drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com16/8/2019 Post graduate version 2019
  • 2.
    Case report • A53 years old gentleman presented with shortness of breath on exertion for last 2 years , increasing in intensity for last 3 months. On examination he is dysnoeic, pulse-128/min, irregular, BP-100/30 mm Hg, RR-32/min, diastolic thrill in apex, mid-diastolic murmur in apical area, early diastolic murmur in left lower sternal area and systolic murmur in aortic area. ECG- Atrial Fibrillation, CXR-P/A view- Cardiomegaly, Echocardiogram-severe mitral stenosis with Moderate AS with severe AR with moderate pulmonary hypertension. Patient underwent DVR and he is doing well. 8/18/2019 Col. Malek Medical College, Manikganj drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com 2
  • 3.
    Normal valve function •Maintainforward flow and prevent reversal of flow. •Valves open and close in response to pressure differences (gradients) between cardiac chambers. drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
  • 9.
    Abnormal valve function •ValveStenosis •Obstruction to valve flow during that phase of the cardiac cycle when the valve is normally open. •Hemodynamic hallmark -“pressure gradient” •Valve Regurgitation, insufficiency, incompetence •Inadequate valve closure → reverse flow of the blood, back leakage •Combined – a single valve can be both stenotic and regurgitant; combinations of valve lesions can coexist •Single disease process •Different disease processes •One valve lesion may cause another •Certain combinations are particularly common(AS & MR, MS & TR)
  • 11.
  • 14.
    Essential questions inthe evaluation of patients for valvular intervention
  • 15.
    Diagnosis • History • Physicalexamination • ECG • Chest x-ray • Echocardiography • Invasive evaluation, CT, MRI
  • 16.
    History •Other known heartdiseses • Congenital heart disease, bicuspid aortic valve • Ischemic heart disease • Rheumatic fever • Hypertrophic/dilated cardiomyopathy • Aortic diseases – Marfans,Ehlers-Danlos
  • 17.
    History • Generally: symptomsof heart failure and low cardiac output • Breathlessness • Chest pain or dyscomfort • Syncope • Fatigue • Peripheral or pulmonary oedema • Palpitations drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
  • 18.
    Physical examination • MURMURS!!! •Periferal oedema • Lung crackles • Elevated JVP • Displaced apex beat, irregular heart beat… Hundreds of eponymous signs from past millenium (↓importance in daily routine, ↑importance for passing exam)
  • 19.
    Heart murmurs •Sounds producesby turbulent blood flow (in valve diseseses, artery stenosis, abnormal chamber or AVcommunication) •Localization,grade, propagation, timing, quality
  • 20.
    Heart murmurs Intensity Description GradeI/VI Barely audible Grade II/VI Audible, but soft Grade III/VI Easily audible Grade IV/VI Easily audible, associated with a thrill Grade V/VI Easily audible, associated with a thrill, and still audible with the stethoscope onlylightly on the chest Grade VI/VI Easily audible, associated with a thrill, and still audible with the stethoscope off of the chest drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
  • 21.
    ECG • Not specific •Findings might be caused or altered by other concomitant heart disease (hypertensive heart disease, ischemic heart disease) • Left ventricular hypertrophy (aortic valve disease) • Left atrial enlargement (mainy MS, but any left heart valve disease) • Atrial fibrilation • Bundle branch block • Arrytmias (atrial fibrilation, ectopic beats)
  • 22.
    Chest x-ray invalvular disease • Different heart shapes in different valvular heart diseses, ↓specificity, ↓significance • Cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion • Widened mediastinum • Valve calcifications, prosthetic valves
  • 23.
    Echocardiography • Mainstay ofvalve disease diagnosis and follow-up • Allows real-time measurement of chamber and wall diameters, ejection fraction assessment and functional valve evaluation • Easily avaiable and repeated • Essential in acute valve disease diagnosis • No radiation harm • Trans-esophageal echocardiography avaiable for patients with poor transthoracic sonographic window
  • 24.
    Invasive evaluation, CT,MRI • Methods usualy used for uncertain cases or repeat cardiac surgery / percutaneous inteventions planning • Angiography to assess regurgitation severity – direct transcatheter contrast medium administration into heart chambers – aortography, ventriculography • Hemodynamic measurment – measuring of intracardial pressures and gradients • CT aortography – method of choice in aortic dissection diagnosis • CMRI – very precise evaluation of cardiac tissues and function, but expensive, low avaiability, long examination time drtoufiq1971@gmail.com
  • 25.
    Echocardiographic criteria forthe definition of severe valve regurgitation: an integrative approach
  • 26.
    Aortic regurgitation • Causes •Chronic aortic regurgitation • Bicuspid aortic valve • Rheumatic and degenerative – always with some degree of stenosis • Aortic root dilation (hypertension, Marfan’s, Ehlers-Danlos, syphylitic aortopathy) • Other rare causes (SLE, RA) • Acute aortic regurgiation • Infective endocarditis • Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 27.
    Aortic regurgitation • Pathophysiologyof chronic aortic regrgitation • Leakage of blood into LV during diastole due to ineffective coaptation of the aortic cusps • Combined pressure and volume overload • Compensatory Mechanisms: LV dilation, LVH. Progressive dilation leads to heart failure • Greatest mass of myocardium in any valve disease – „cor bovinum“ – over 500g Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Aortic regurgitation • Presentation •Dyspnea: exertional, orthopnea, and paroxsymal nocturnal dyspnea • Chest pain • Fatigue • Palpitations: due to increased force of contraction or arrythmias Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 30.
    •Physical findings (theones you might find) • Diastolic blowing murmur at the left sternal border – might be very discrete. Systolic ejection murmur might be present due to increased blood flow across the aortic valve of concomitant valve stenosis • Wide pulse pressure – caused by diastolic regurgitation of blood to LV and fast decrease of diastolic BP – „Corrigan’s pulse“ (160/30 mmHg…) • Heaving and laterally displaced apex beat – due to dilated heart with giant stroke volume Aortic regurgitation Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 31.
    •Physical findings (theones you might not find…) • Quincke’s sign - pulsations of nail bed • Muller’s sign - pulsation of uvula • De Musset sign - (head nodding in time with the heart beat) • Duroziez sign (systolic and diastolic murmurs heard over the femoral artery when it is gradually compressed with the stethoscope) • Austin Flint murmur (apex): Regurgitant jet impinges on anterior MVL causing it to vibrate Aortic regurgitation Aortic regurgitation
  • 32.
    Aortic regurgitation Echocardiographic Evaluation Assessmentof valve morphology: tricuspid, bicuspid, unicuspid or quadricuspid valve. • Determination of the direction of the aortic regurgitation jet in the long-axis view (central or eccentric) and its origin in the short-axis view (central or commissural). • Identification of the mechanism, following the same principle as for mitral regurgitation: normal cusps but insufficient coaptation due to dilatation of the aortic root with central jet (type 1), cusp prolapse with eccentric jet (type 2) or retraction with poor cusp tissue quality and large central or eccentric jet (type 3).
  • 33.
    Aortic regurgitation Echocardiographic Evaluation •Quantification of aortic regurgitation should follow an integrated approach considering all qualitative, semi- quantitative and quantitative parameters. • Measurement of LV function and dimensions. Indexing LV diameters for body surface area (BSA) is recommended in patients with small body size (BSA <1.68 m2). • New parameters obtained by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging may be useful, particularly in patients with borderline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), where they may help in the decision for surgery.
  • 34.
    Aortic regurgitation Echocardiographic Evaluation •Measurement of the aortic root and ascending aorta in the 2- dimensional (2D) mode at four levels: annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and tubular ascending aorta. Measurements are taken in the parasternal long-axis view from leading edge to leading edge at end diastole, except for the aortic annulus, which is measured in mid systole. • As it will have surgical consequences, it is important to differentiate three phenotypes of the ascending aorta: aortic root aneurysms (sinuses of Valsalva >45mm), tubular ascending aneurysm (sinuses of Valsalva <40– 45mm) and isolated aortic regurgitation (all diameters <40mm). The calculation of indexed values has been recommended to account for body size.
  • 35.
    Aortic regurgitation Echocardiographic Evaluation •Definition of the anatomy of the aortic valve cusps and assessment of valve reparability should be provided by preoperative TOE if aortic valve repair or a valve-sparing surgery of the aortic root is considered. • Intraoperative evaluation of the surgical result by TOE is mandatory in patients in whom the aortic valve is preserved or repaired in the procedure.
  • 36.
    Aortic regurgitation • Acuteaortic regurgitation • Caused by a leaflet perforation in infective endocarditis • In aortic dissection due to a change in aortic root geometry – dilation, extensive intimal tear with prolapse into LVOT and coaptation impairment • Presentation of acute aortic regurgitation itself is usually a pulmonary oedema accompanied by symptoms of the causing pathology • True emergency – mostly requires immediate cardiac surgery Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 37.
    Aortic regurgitation Therapy –surgical •Isolated leaflet pathology - aortic valve replacement • Aortic root pathology - combined aortic root, ascendent aorta and aortic valve replacement – Bentall’s procedure Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 38.
    Aortic regurgitation Indication forreplacement • Severe aortic regurgitation (EROA – effective regurgitant orifice area >0,3 cm2) • Symptomatic • LV dilates (over 50 mm EDD) or function decreases (EF < 55%) • Other indication for surgery • Acute • Moderate regurgitation (AVA 1,5-1 cm2 ) • With other indication for surgery Aortic regurgitation
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 43.
  • 44.
  • 45.
  • 47.
    Target INR formechanical prostheses drtoufiq19711@yahoo.com
  • 48.
    Recommended requirements ofa heart valve Centre
  • 49.
    The evaluation ofaortic regurgitation requires consideration of valve morphology and the mechanism and severity of regurgitation, including careful assessment of aortic dilatation. • In asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation, careful follow-up of symptomatic status and LV size and function is mandatory. • The strongest indication for valve surgery is the presence of symptoms (spontaneous or on exercise testing) and/or the documentation of LVEF <50% and/or end-systolic diameter >50 mm. • In patients with a dilated aorta, definition of the aortic pathology and accurate measurements of aortic diameters are crucial to guide the timing and type of surgery. • Aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic surgery instead of aortic valve replacement should be considered in selected cases in experienced centres. Aortic regurgitation drtoufiq1971@gmail.com