Downloaded 24 times
More Related Content
Similar to ACE Team 2 - WK6 - IPD Presentation
ACE Team 2 - WK6 - IPD Presentation
- 1. INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY ACEMentorship Program: Team 2, January 20th, 2015
- 2. Design-Bid-Build: traditional approach– owner contracts separately with all parties. Occasionally referred to as Design-Bid-ReDesign-ReBid-Build. Design-Build: One entity performs both architecturalengineering design and construction under one contract. Either an architect-led or contractor-led approach. CM-at Risk, or GMP: Construction Manager is a consultant to the owner during design phases, and acts as general contractor during construction with a commitment to deliver the project within a guaranteed maximum price. Turnkey Project Delivery: frequently used in power plants, manufacturing facilities, a method to provide an owner with a complete facility, ready to operate and turn out product. Traditional processes
- 3. Design- Bid- BuildMost common form of Project Delivery •Three phases, three prime players •Independent contracts between architect/owner and contractor/owner •Linear sequence of work •Common with public owners with requirements to select low bid
- 4. •One entity hiredby Owner to complete design and construction •May all be Contractor's in-house design expertise or Contractor may engage outside Architect •Early cost commitment is made (GMP) by Contractor based upon preliminary design OWNER DESIGN - BUILDER S F Design- Build E E
- 5. Everyone Signs theSame Agreement Full IPD Owner Sub.ContractorCons. Architect Sub.Cons. AIA C195 ConsensusDocs 300
- 6. 1/14/2016 6 Traditional (Today) IntegratedProject Delivery (Tomorrow) Fragmented, assembled on “just- as-needed” or “minimum necessary” basis, strongly hierarchical, controlled TEAMS An integrated team entity composed of all project lifecycle stakeholders, assembled early in the process, open, collaborative Linear, distinct, segregated; knowledge gathered “just-as- needed”; information hoarded PROCESS Concurrent, multi-level, integrated; early contributions of knowledge and expertise; information openly shared Individually managed, transferred to the greatest extent possible RISK Collectively managed, appropriately shared Individually pursued; minimum effort for maximum return;(usually) first-cost based COMPENSATION REWARD Team success tied to project success; value-based Paper-based, 2 dimensional; analog COMMUNICATION S TECHNOLOGY Digitally based, virtual, 4 dimensional; BIM Minimum effort for maximum return; minimize or transfer risk; don’t share AGREEMENTS Encourage, foster, promote and support open sharing and collaboration, full integration Individually focused, emphasis on composition EDUCATION Team-based, integrated, collaborative; technologically inclusive; materials and methods focus in addition to compositionAIA California Council IPD FAQ - 2006
- 7. 1/14/2016 7 PD SD CDPR CA OPDD Time Effort/Effect PD: Pre-design SD: Schematic design DD: Design development CD: Construction documentation PR: Procurement CA: Construction Administration OP: Operation Graphic originated by Patrick McLeay, AIA / HOK Ability to impact cost and functional capabilities1 1 Cost of design changes 2 2 Traditional design process3 3 Preferred design process 4 4 • Owner Leadership • Integrated Project Structure • Open Information Sharing • Virtual Building Models It’s about Productivity
- 8. Agency Owner Architect Engineers GC Subs Predesign Schematic Design Design Development Construction Documents Agency Permit / Bidding ConstructionCloseout WHO REALIZE HOW WHAT Traditional WHAT WHO HOW Agency Owner Architect Engineers GC Subs Conceptual- ization Criteria Design Detailed Design Implementation Documents Agency Coord / Final Buyout Construction Closeout REALIZE Integrated •Define the processes, structure and metrics up front! Source: AIA Convention 2009 – Jim Bedrick
- 11. Competitive SchematicDesign. The winner was ($655,000) under 2nd place. Competitive approach to 3 systems, saving ($132,000) in supplemental support steel. LEAN approach to have contract documents designed to 1 curtain wall system manufacturer Integrated approach with all stakeholders collaborating to achieve the best solution
- 12. Used pre-engineered curtainwall system. Architect spent less time designing. Project relied heavily on Trade Partner shop drawings and Revit model for final construction drawings. Saved time & money!
- 19. Hand Drawing 2DCAD 3D CAD EVOLUTION From Hand Drawing to Smart Models BIM
- 20. Electrical Detailer Structural SteelDetailer Mechanical Piping Detailer MEP Manager BIM Engineer Model & CAD Drawings Architect Smartboard & Projector 3D MEP Coordination
- 24.
Editor's Notes
- #2 1
- #3 2
- #4 3
- #5 4
- #7 Talk about categories
- #8 In the following diagram provided courtesy of Patrick McLeay of HOK, we understand that the ability to impact cost and functional capabilities during a project decreases over life of the project. All the while, the cost of design changes increases as the project cycle progresses. Currently, most of the project design decision-making occurs in the white curve, where the ability to impact cost and functional capabilities crosses with the cost of design changes. A preferred scenario would be to move the design decisions forward in the design process, when the cost of change is low, and the ability to impact cost and functional capabilities is high. A building information modeling approach seeks to accomplish this objective.
- #9 IPD Definition Task Group
- #20 19