SlideShare a Scribd company logo
FMP Evaluation
Joseph Sam Fulton
Production Process Evaluation
Research
• Strengths - The strengths of my research was the fact that I was able to research magazines and experienced what they
look and how they should be constructed, which helped me understand the format of how I was going to make my
magazine. My magazine research also helped me in understanding of what theme and genre I was going for. I also made a
questionnaire of questions to help me understand what my audience were interested in seeing in my magazine and in the
rest of my products. The questionnaire was mainly focused on my magazine as that is my main product. Also that was one of
the things I was most unsure about. Another strength about my research was the fact that I could research a good logo and
understand what colours I shouldn’t use and what colour would look appropriate with the magazine product. Researching
the logo would also allow me to understand not patterns and creations to make without copying other logos, to prevent
them from looking like another. Another strength of my research would be the fact that I searched website makers to find
the best one to use, to make my website look the best it could look. Once found I was then able to search for other game
websites on the internet, this helped in understanding how the layout of it was made and what makes a good looking
website. Another strength of my research was myself researching audio interviews and seeing how game companies make
them. This allowed to make a good, interesting game interview with a couple of people, that matched that of other
interviews on the market.
• Weaknesses – The weaknesses of my research was that it took longer than I originally expected and I ended up rushing it
because I started running out of time. Which ended up making my research look mediocre at best. Another weakness was
the fact that I didn’t really get a lot of information back from my questionnaire, so I couldn’t really get a good idea of what
my audience was interested in, which let me down a bit. Also the questionnaire was reasonably time consuming, so I
potentially wasted a bit of time doing that when I could have been investing more time in some of the earlier slides in the
research PowerPoint.
Planning
– Strengths – The strengths of my planning was that I was able to get a clear idea of what I wanted to get my product like.
Another strength that I got form my planning was that I was able to make a couple of ideas before I settled on my final idea.
Which allowed me to be able to have a go at trying different things, move things around that perhaps looked out of place. It
allowed to broadcast my ideas into different ideas I had until I finally decided on my final design. The planning helped my
product because I believe that it saved me a lot of time, as if I went into my final product knowing only half of what I wanted to
do then I wouldn’t have produced a good enough or as good of a piece of work as I have. As I would have contemplated things
all the time as I had everything planned out. A big strength of my planning was probably my logo experiment. As that was the
one I was least sure about. So I made a plan of it and it gave me a great idea of what my final design was going to be.
– Weaknesses – The weaknesses of my planning was that I didn’t really plan my work enough, especially the main magazine part.
So if I could I would turn back and plan that a bit more, so I didn't’t go into it completely blind and figure out what I wanted to
do. Another weakness was I may have spent too much time planning my work as well. As I only practiced one thing but that
one thing took too long to make, for a practice anyway. So it intervened with the rest of my work, when it really shouldn’t have.
I feel as though I should have done more plans as mentioned above only doing one was a definite mistake. Doing more plans
even for my logo would give me a clearer idea of what to do and would make what I I’m trying to showcase so much more
professional and better. Just doing this would have made my product look miles better.
Time Management
• I think I managed my time alright but it definitely could have been better. I gave myself quite a lot of work load so It was a
struggle to achieve everything in a short period of time but I managed it as well as I could. I would of loved extra time to
produce my final products as I really wanted everything I did to be perfect, so I spent more time on everything than I would
normally do. So with additional time I wold be able to make my work so much more attractive and better. I did however
manage my time well at the start before my production started. So I think if I was granted additional time then my product
would have been perfect. Also on occasional times, slides took longer to do than others so I spent more time and sometimes
went over on the deadline due to the fact I was over working myself on particular slides.
Technical Qualities
The product on the left is my product, the one on the other is the real life magazine product. The similarities of my product and the one
on the right is that they both feature a game on the cover that is themed around the game. For example the product on the right is
themed around the game of “Battlefield 1”, whilst my game is themed around “Red Dead redemption 2”, hence the background and the
font of it, is a red shade and the Battlefield one is grey and dark, to perhaps symbolize the war theme. Another similarity is the use of
our own individual logos, mine shown in the top left hand corner, whilst there's shown in the center of the top of the page. My product
is also similar to the one on the right as we both include plugs and little sub texts to intrigued the audience more than we already do
with the game them in the back. We also are similar in the way that we both include barcodes within both of the covers, that adds
professionalism and makes the magazines look ,much better. The differences between my product and the product on the right is that
the one of the right includes more information about other games whilst mine sticks very much to one game. Another difference is that
the layout of each of our game covers our different and look different in color.
Technical Qualities
The similarities between the two logos is the main colour difference, the Xbox logo is green whilst my colour scheme sticks with being a
dark shade of black. I have chosen the black as no other games logo is black, I didn’t want my viewers being confused thinking my logo was
that of something else. Another similarity is that the logos are entirely in capitals, I think we have both done this because it makes both of
the logos stand out and people are able to see them more clearly. Another similarity is that both logos seem to have an image and text to
go with it. To indicate that everybody knows the name of the logo. The difference between the two logos is that the product on the right
looks more casual and seems as though it would have a younger audience whilst I believe my logo looks more mature and adult than the
one on the right. Another difference is that my logo could be branded on other things than a magazine, whilst it seems the logo on the right
seems as though it could only be gaming orientated.
Aesthetic Qualities
I think my work does look really good and I think the things I have presented on it are very creative if I’m being modest. A lot of my
product is very visually good to look at and I’m pleased with everything that I included within and the content of each individual
product. Although there is a one page spread of my magazine that I think didn’t live up to the others, which I have mentioned
throughout and that’s the Dark soul 3 review. As it wasn’t really clearly structured and it looked a bit messy, than the previous work I
had created. Other than that though I think everything else was more or less perfect and I think that is reflected within my peer
feedback. Perhaps another aspect of my product I would have improved would have been the design and the information located on
my website. As it just seemed a bit sparse and a bit isolated to the rest of my work, which I didn’t really like, I also would have liked to
incorporate my audio interview on there but I just didn’t have the time to manage it.
Strengths – I think the big strengths of my product was my magazine and my logo as they fit my main product audience and they look
very mature and fitting. My logo feels as though it would fit any genre of something. For example a film magazine or a radio/tv based
genre. Another strength is that every product I produced all seems to flow of each other and is easily understandable what the main
purpose of my product is. Also reflecting back on my magazine, upon reading it you will realize that the language and the way I have
worded thing is mature and correct. Reading it, it appeals to an older audience because of it but stays young with the design of the
reviews.
Weaknesses – I think the big weaknesses of my product was my website. I really wasn’t pleased with it what-so ever. It seems out of
place compared to the magazine and the logo and doesn’t really fit that design and colour scheme as I have chosen with my other
products. The information stated on the website isn’t my information but the website placed it there to keep my magazine updated and
detailed. Like I mentioned with the colour scheme, I don’t think I could make up my mind with the audience age range as my website
looks very professional and definitely older than what I am going for. Instead what I should of done was a bright colour or a cinematic
gaming background, as this would have appealed to multiple age groups and still would of looked good.
Audience Appeal
My product in some areas appeals to my audience and some it does not. The reason behind this is I got lost when making my website
and it came off looking second best, with myself not knowing how I wanted to design my website and how I wanted it to look. This
then came of as the website looking nothing like I visualized and nothing like how my audience would want to see it. In saying that
though I managed to produce three other great products that I know my dedicated audience would like and what to see more. For
example my magazine that I created is educational and fun at the same time, applying to my older members of my audience but
sticking young with the games and not so educational side. The magazine also supplies great reading material and even if you’re not so
crazy about games it’s a great thing to just read. For my younger audience members say 15 and 16, I have made a youngish looking but
still cool and cinematic front cover for my magazine that I know my audience will appreciate and judging from my questionnaire they
definitely will. Like I take care of my younger audience I like to take care of my older, so I have featured some games in there that are
18+ so that any of my younger audience who reads it, wont really understand but it will still apply to them as they could learn some
great things from it. Looking at my logo its very much that of the same as my magazine but obviously just a lot more simpler. My logo
appeals to my audience in the same way as my magazine, it entices younger and older generations as the style of it is mature yet
young. I made it that why to signify that my audience is open to all ages.
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– The products all have a lot of information on the games that were spoken about including opinions
which really help readers to make their own personal decisions on what they think of the game if
they’ve never seen it before, or give them a second opinion if they're unsure on their own.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– No paragraphing, no sub-headings and no links to external websites to read more.
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
• I really enjoyed the magazine part of this product a lot. As I think it was excellently produced and looked really good. The
front cover looked professional and looked as if it belonged in a shop, as it was very realistic. Pretty much all of the pages
looked as if they were real. The logo I really enjoyed as well, as it looked very formal and fitted the genre that this person
was going for. The website was enjoyable to view and really interesting to look at, so I enjoyed that.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• A few improvements could be made to this product for example the website didn’t really have loads of information on it,
which I would have liked to see but other than that the website was really good, so maybe just including a few more
paragraphs, it would have made the product look miles better. Another improvement would have been to change the layout
of one of the magazines as I didn’t feel as though the Dark Souls 3 one was as effective as the others.
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• I liked a few of the magazine covers and enjoyed the double page spread ideas. The website was good and looked
informative. The logo was also very well done and looked professional and stood out amongst other logos on the market, it
also didn’t match any colours that other big companies have used.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• There isn’t really a lot of improvements to this product as thought it was very good. Only one striking one I could think of
though was probably the dark souls 3 review page as it just didn’t compare the greatness of the other two. So maybe if the
person spent a bit more time on it, it may have been better.
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
• I agree with a lot of what people have said about my feedback: I liked and agreed with the fact that people are stating that I
am including a lot of information within my magazine and website, I also agree with how people have said that my logo
looks and seems very professional as that was the look I was intending for. All the feedback presented about the logo was all
positive and agreed with all of it. I agree with the fact that one person liked my opinions and thoughts throughout my work,
as that was one of the things I was most concerned about.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
• I would disagree with a few things from my peer feedback, one of those things being the information of my website, as I
thought that the information I included was relevant and important and didn’t go over the top and overwhelm my viewers.
Another thing I disagreed with was the no paragraphing and the bad skills used on the “Dark Souls 3” review page. As I feel
as though to criticise that, is a little harsh and unfair. As the work and the information included was good and the
paragraphing was fair in my opinion. Also I think that the Dark souls 3 page was on par with the rest of the work that I was
producing and I wasn’t rushing to finish it, like one person suggested.
Peer Feedback Summary
The changes that I would make based upon my peer feedback would be the page that people didn’t really enjoy as it didn’t really
match up to the rest of my work. As looking back on it I can understand the problem of the dark souls 3 page, it did look a bit
rushed and a bit different to the rest of the work I produced. So if I could go back I would change that and make it look a bit more
presentable than it already does. Another change I would make would probably be the fact that I could include more information
on my website as looking back on it did look a bit sparse and a bit bare, instead of a informative website that I originally wanted to
produce. I think changing it would make the website look more appropriate and look more symbolic of an actual website, as
looking at it at the minute it just looks image based and empty. Another change I would also do would be to include a internal link
from my magazine to my website as that would have added professionalism and made my product as a whole look better and
more beneficial to the rest of my products. Also having a internal link onto my magazine would have been a great idea to
advertise my website and get more people to view it, which would have helped me get my product out there.

More Related Content

What's hot

7. fmp evaluation luke
7. fmp evaluation luke7. fmp evaluation luke
7. fmp evaluation luke
luke young
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
SamuelJohnson74
 
LO4 Evaluation Resubmission
LO4 Evaluation ResubmissionLO4 Evaluation Resubmission
LO4 Evaluation Resubmission
Louis_Wheelton
 
Professional writing task 10 evaluation
Professional writing task 10 evaluationProfessional writing task 10 evaluation
Professional writing task 10 evaluationRyan Goldsmith
 
Print Evaluation
Print EvaluationPrint Evaluation
Print Evaluation
RebeccaEdwards79
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
yorkcollege
 
7. evaluation 1-1
7. evaluation 1-17. evaluation 1-1
7. evaluation 1-1
Sam Fulton
 
Final evaluation
Final evaluationFinal evaluation
Final evaluationrachel1305
 
Fanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationFanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluation
HarrietSmith35
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
Abigail Long
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
Jack Ward
 
Factual Evaluation
Factual Evaluation Factual Evaluation
Factual Evaluation
Alexander Sullivan-Cree
 

What's hot (17)

7. fmp evaluation luke
7. fmp evaluation luke7. fmp evaluation luke
7. fmp evaluation luke
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
7. FMP
7. FMP7. FMP
7. FMP
 
LO4 Evaluation Resubmission
LO4 Evaluation ResubmissionLO4 Evaluation Resubmission
LO4 Evaluation Resubmission
 
Professional writing task 10 evaluation
Professional writing task 10 evaluationProfessional writing task 10 evaluation
Professional writing task 10 evaluation
 
Print Evaluation
Print EvaluationPrint Evaluation
Print Evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. evaluation 1-1
7. evaluation 1-17. evaluation 1-1
7. evaluation 1-1
 
7. evaluation v1
7. evaluation v17. evaluation v1
7. evaluation v1
 
2. proposal
2. proposal2. proposal
2. proposal
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Final evaluation
Final evaluationFinal evaluation
Final evaluation
 
Fanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluationFanzine evaluation
Fanzine evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
Factual Evaluation
Factual Evaluation Factual Evaluation
Factual Evaluation
 

Similar to 7. fmp evaluation(1)(1)

7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
jack-morton
 
7. fmp evaluation done
7. fmp evaluation done7. fmp evaluation done
7. fmp evaluation done
BenjaminLawrenson
 
7. evaluation 1-1-1
7. evaluation 1-1-17. evaluation 1-1-1
7. evaluation 1-1-1
Sam Fulton
 
8. evaluation
8. evaluation8. evaluation
8. evaluation
Tommy Lister
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
joshpalmmer
 
8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation
Harry Taylor
 
8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation
Harry Taylor
 
7. evaluation1
7. evaluation17. evaluation1
7. evaluation1
BenjaminLawrenson
 
7. evaluation(2)(1)
7. evaluation(2)(1)7. evaluation(2)(1)
7. evaluation(2)(1)
Sam Fulton
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
yorkcollege
 
Fmp evaluation
Fmp evaluationFmp evaluation
Fmp evaluation
Ben Harris
 
7. evaluation(visual)
7. evaluation(visual)7. evaluation(visual)
7. evaluation(visual)
JoeFarrell32
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
Stephen Royle
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
jay birkin
 
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
NathanMillett
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
GeorgiaCoop
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
AllanGodin
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
charlielamb1
 

Similar to 7. fmp evaluation(1)(1) (20)

7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
7. fmp evaluation done
7. fmp evaluation done7. fmp evaluation done
7. fmp evaluation done
 
7. evaluation 1-1-1
7. evaluation 1-1-17. evaluation 1-1-1
7. evaluation 1-1-1
 
8. evaluation
8. evaluation8. evaluation
8. evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation(3) 1 2
7. evaluation(3) 1 27. evaluation(3) 1 2
7. evaluation(3) 1 2
 
8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation
 
8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation8. Evaluation
8. Evaluation
 
7. evaluation1
7. evaluation17. evaluation1
7. evaluation1
 
7. evaluation(2)(1)
7. evaluation(2)(1)7. evaluation(2)(1)
7. evaluation(2)(1)
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
Fmp evaluation
Fmp evaluationFmp evaluation
Fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)7. evaluation(2)
7. evaluation(2)
 
7. evaluation(visual)
7. evaluation(visual)7. evaluation(visual)
7. evaluation(visual)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
L3 cmpt y2 evaluation template (1)
 
7. evaluation
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluation
 
7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluation
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 

More from Sam Fulton

6. production reflection joe
6. production reflection joe6. production reflection joe
6. production reflection joe
Sam Fulton
 
3. production experiments 1-1-1
3. production experiments 1-1-13. production experiments 1-1-1
3. production experiments 1-1-1
Sam Fulton
 
4. proposal (1)
4. proposal (1)4. proposal (1)
4. proposal (1)
Sam Fulton
 
2. research(1) (3)
2. research(1) (3)2. research(1) (3)
2. research(1) (3)
Sam Fulton
 
Theory meaning pro-forma (2)
Theory  meaning pro-forma (2)Theory  meaning pro-forma (2)
Theory meaning pro-forma (2)
Sam Fulton
 
6. fmp production reflection
6. fmp production reflection6. fmp production reflection
6. fmp production reflection
Sam Fulton
 
fmp proposal
fmp proposalfmp proposal
fmp proposal
Sam Fulton
 
2. research(1) (1)
2. research(1) (1)2. research(1) (1)
2. research(1) (1)
Sam Fulton
 
1. work related learning research(1)
1. work related learning research(1)1. work related learning research(1)
1. work related learning research(1)
Sam Fulton
 
Creative cv
Creative cvCreative cv
Creative cv
Sam Fulton
 
5. fmp pre production(1)
5. fmp pre production(1)5. fmp pre production(1)
5. fmp pre production(1)
Sam Fulton
 
2. fmp research
2. fmp research2. fmp research
2. fmp research
Sam Fulton
 
2. fmp research
2. fmp research2. fmp research
2. fmp research
Sam Fulton
 
6. production reflection(2) (1)
6. production reflection(2) (1)6. production reflection(2) (1)
6. production reflection(2) (1)
Sam Fulton
 
5. pre production(2) (1)
5. pre production(2) (1)5. pre production(2) (1)
5. pre production(2) (1)
Sam Fulton
 
4. proposal(2)
4. proposal(2)4. proposal(2)
4. proposal(2)
Sam Fulton
 
3. production experiments(2)
3. production experiments(2)3. production experiments(2)
3. production experiments(2)
Sam Fulton
 
2. research interactive j fpptx
2. research interactive j fpptx2. research interactive j fpptx
2. research interactive j fpptx
Sam Fulton
 
2. fmp research(1)(1)
2. fmp research(1)(1)2. fmp research(1)(1)
2. fmp research(1)(1)
Sam Fulton
 

More from Sam Fulton (20)

6. production reflection joe
6. production reflection joe6. production reflection joe
6. production reflection joe
 
3. production experiments 1-1-1
3. production experiments 1-1-13. production experiments 1-1-1
3. production experiments 1-1-1
 
4. proposal (1)
4. proposal (1)4. proposal (1)
4. proposal (1)
 
2. research(1) (3)
2. research(1) (3)2. research(1) (3)
2. research(1) (3)
 
Theory meaning pro-forma (2)
Theory  meaning pro-forma (2)Theory  meaning pro-forma (2)
Theory meaning pro-forma (2)
 
6. fmp production reflection
6. fmp production reflection6. fmp production reflection
6. fmp production reflection
 
fmp proposal
fmp proposalfmp proposal
fmp proposal
 
2. research(1) (1)
2. research(1) (1)2. research(1) (1)
2. research(1) (1)
 
1. work related learning research(1)
1. work related learning research(1)1. work related learning research(1)
1. work related learning research(1)
 
Creative cv
Creative cvCreative cv
Creative cv
 
Cv
CvCv
Cv
 
5. fmp pre production(1)
5. fmp pre production(1)5. fmp pre production(1)
5. fmp pre production(1)
 
2. fmp research
2. fmp research2. fmp research
2. fmp research
 
2. fmp research
2. fmp research2. fmp research
2. fmp research
 
6. production reflection(2) (1)
6. production reflection(2) (1)6. production reflection(2) (1)
6. production reflection(2) (1)
 
5. pre production(2) (1)
5. pre production(2) (1)5. pre production(2) (1)
5. pre production(2) (1)
 
4. proposal(2)
4. proposal(2)4. proposal(2)
4. proposal(2)
 
3. production experiments(2)
3. production experiments(2)3. production experiments(2)
3. production experiments(2)
 
2. research interactive j fpptx
2. research interactive j fpptx2. research interactive j fpptx
2. research interactive j fpptx
 
2. fmp research(1)(1)
2. fmp research(1)(1)2. fmp research(1)(1)
2. fmp research(1)(1)
 

Recently uploaded

Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
Col Mukteshwar Prasad
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
rosedainty
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
PedroFerreira53928
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIRIAMSALINAS13
 
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
Jisc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdfSectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPhrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Phrasal Verbs.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
 
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptxThe approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
 

7. fmp evaluation(1)(1)

  • 3. Research • Strengths - The strengths of my research was the fact that I was able to research magazines and experienced what they look and how they should be constructed, which helped me understand the format of how I was going to make my magazine. My magazine research also helped me in understanding of what theme and genre I was going for. I also made a questionnaire of questions to help me understand what my audience were interested in seeing in my magazine and in the rest of my products. The questionnaire was mainly focused on my magazine as that is my main product. Also that was one of the things I was most unsure about. Another strength about my research was the fact that I could research a good logo and understand what colours I shouldn’t use and what colour would look appropriate with the magazine product. Researching the logo would also allow me to understand not patterns and creations to make without copying other logos, to prevent them from looking like another. Another strength of my research would be the fact that I searched website makers to find the best one to use, to make my website look the best it could look. Once found I was then able to search for other game websites on the internet, this helped in understanding how the layout of it was made and what makes a good looking website. Another strength of my research was myself researching audio interviews and seeing how game companies make them. This allowed to make a good, interesting game interview with a couple of people, that matched that of other interviews on the market. • Weaknesses – The weaknesses of my research was that it took longer than I originally expected and I ended up rushing it because I started running out of time. Which ended up making my research look mediocre at best. Another weakness was the fact that I didn’t really get a lot of information back from my questionnaire, so I couldn’t really get a good idea of what my audience was interested in, which let me down a bit. Also the questionnaire was reasonably time consuming, so I potentially wasted a bit of time doing that when I could have been investing more time in some of the earlier slides in the research PowerPoint.
  • 4. Planning – Strengths – The strengths of my planning was that I was able to get a clear idea of what I wanted to get my product like. Another strength that I got form my planning was that I was able to make a couple of ideas before I settled on my final idea. Which allowed me to be able to have a go at trying different things, move things around that perhaps looked out of place. It allowed to broadcast my ideas into different ideas I had until I finally decided on my final design. The planning helped my product because I believe that it saved me a lot of time, as if I went into my final product knowing only half of what I wanted to do then I wouldn’t have produced a good enough or as good of a piece of work as I have. As I would have contemplated things all the time as I had everything planned out. A big strength of my planning was probably my logo experiment. As that was the one I was least sure about. So I made a plan of it and it gave me a great idea of what my final design was going to be. – Weaknesses – The weaknesses of my planning was that I didn’t really plan my work enough, especially the main magazine part. So if I could I would turn back and plan that a bit more, so I didn't’t go into it completely blind and figure out what I wanted to do. Another weakness was I may have spent too much time planning my work as well. As I only practiced one thing but that one thing took too long to make, for a practice anyway. So it intervened with the rest of my work, when it really shouldn’t have. I feel as though I should have done more plans as mentioned above only doing one was a definite mistake. Doing more plans even for my logo would give me a clearer idea of what to do and would make what I I’m trying to showcase so much more professional and better. Just doing this would have made my product look miles better.
  • 5. Time Management • I think I managed my time alright but it definitely could have been better. I gave myself quite a lot of work load so It was a struggle to achieve everything in a short period of time but I managed it as well as I could. I would of loved extra time to produce my final products as I really wanted everything I did to be perfect, so I spent more time on everything than I would normally do. So with additional time I wold be able to make my work so much more attractive and better. I did however manage my time well at the start before my production started. So I think if I was granted additional time then my product would have been perfect. Also on occasional times, slides took longer to do than others so I spent more time and sometimes went over on the deadline due to the fact I was over working myself on particular slides.
  • 6. Technical Qualities The product on the left is my product, the one on the other is the real life magazine product. The similarities of my product and the one on the right is that they both feature a game on the cover that is themed around the game. For example the product on the right is themed around the game of “Battlefield 1”, whilst my game is themed around “Red Dead redemption 2”, hence the background and the font of it, is a red shade and the Battlefield one is grey and dark, to perhaps symbolize the war theme. Another similarity is the use of our own individual logos, mine shown in the top left hand corner, whilst there's shown in the center of the top of the page. My product is also similar to the one on the right as we both include plugs and little sub texts to intrigued the audience more than we already do with the game them in the back. We also are similar in the way that we both include barcodes within both of the covers, that adds professionalism and makes the magazines look ,much better. The differences between my product and the product on the right is that the one of the right includes more information about other games whilst mine sticks very much to one game. Another difference is that the layout of each of our game covers our different and look different in color.
  • 7. Technical Qualities The similarities between the two logos is the main colour difference, the Xbox logo is green whilst my colour scheme sticks with being a dark shade of black. I have chosen the black as no other games logo is black, I didn’t want my viewers being confused thinking my logo was that of something else. Another similarity is that the logos are entirely in capitals, I think we have both done this because it makes both of the logos stand out and people are able to see them more clearly. Another similarity is that both logos seem to have an image and text to go with it. To indicate that everybody knows the name of the logo. The difference between the two logos is that the product on the right looks more casual and seems as though it would have a younger audience whilst I believe my logo looks more mature and adult than the one on the right. Another difference is that my logo could be branded on other things than a magazine, whilst it seems the logo on the right seems as though it could only be gaming orientated.
  • 8. Aesthetic Qualities I think my work does look really good and I think the things I have presented on it are very creative if I’m being modest. A lot of my product is very visually good to look at and I’m pleased with everything that I included within and the content of each individual product. Although there is a one page spread of my magazine that I think didn’t live up to the others, which I have mentioned throughout and that’s the Dark soul 3 review. As it wasn’t really clearly structured and it looked a bit messy, than the previous work I had created. Other than that though I think everything else was more or less perfect and I think that is reflected within my peer feedback. Perhaps another aspect of my product I would have improved would have been the design and the information located on my website. As it just seemed a bit sparse and a bit isolated to the rest of my work, which I didn’t really like, I also would have liked to incorporate my audio interview on there but I just didn’t have the time to manage it. Strengths – I think the big strengths of my product was my magazine and my logo as they fit my main product audience and they look very mature and fitting. My logo feels as though it would fit any genre of something. For example a film magazine or a radio/tv based genre. Another strength is that every product I produced all seems to flow of each other and is easily understandable what the main purpose of my product is. Also reflecting back on my magazine, upon reading it you will realize that the language and the way I have worded thing is mature and correct. Reading it, it appeals to an older audience because of it but stays young with the design of the reviews. Weaknesses – I think the big weaknesses of my product was my website. I really wasn’t pleased with it what-so ever. It seems out of place compared to the magazine and the logo and doesn’t really fit that design and colour scheme as I have chosen with my other products. The information stated on the website isn’t my information but the website placed it there to keep my magazine updated and detailed. Like I mentioned with the colour scheme, I don’t think I could make up my mind with the audience age range as my website looks very professional and definitely older than what I am going for. Instead what I should of done was a bright colour or a cinematic gaming background, as this would have appealed to multiple age groups and still would of looked good.
  • 9. Audience Appeal My product in some areas appeals to my audience and some it does not. The reason behind this is I got lost when making my website and it came off looking second best, with myself not knowing how I wanted to design my website and how I wanted it to look. This then came of as the website looking nothing like I visualized and nothing like how my audience would want to see it. In saying that though I managed to produce three other great products that I know my dedicated audience would like and what to see more. For example my magazine that I created is educational and fun at the same time, applying to my older members of my audience but sticking young with the games and not so educational side. The magazine also supplies great reading material and even if you’re not so crazy about games it’s a great thing to just read. For my younger audience members say 15 and 16, I have made a youngish looking but still cool and cinematic front cover for my magazine that I know my audience will appreciate and judging from my questionnaire they definitely will. Like I take care of my younger audience I like to take care of my older, so I have featured some games in there that are 18+ so that any of my younger audience who reads it, wont really understand but it will still apply to them as they could learn some great things from it. Looking at my logo its very much that of the same as my magazine but obviously just a lot more simpler. My logo appeals to my audience in the same way as my magazine, it entices younger and older generations as the style of it is mature yet young. I made it that why to signify that my audience is open to all ages.
  • 11. Feedback 1 • What did you like about the product? – The products all have a lot of information on the games that were spoken about including opinions which really help readers to make their own personal decisions on what they think of the game if they’ve never seen it before, or give them a second opinion if they're unsure on their own. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – No paragraphing, no sub-headings and no links to external websites to read more.
  • 12. Feedback 2 • What did you like about the product? • I really enjoyed the magazine part of this product a lot. As I think it was excellently produced and looked really good. The front cover looked professional and looked as if it belonged in a shop, as it was very realistic. Pretty much all of the pages looked as if they were real. The logo I really enjoyed as well, as it looked very formal and fitted the genre that this person was going for. The website was enjoyable to view and really interesting to look at, so I enjoyed that. • What improvements could have been made to the product? • A few improvements could be made to this product for example the website didn’t really have loads of information on it, which I would have liked to see but other than that the website was really good, so maybe just including a few more paragraphs, it would have made the product look miles better. Another improvement would have been to change the layout of one of the magazines as I didn’t feel as though the Dark Souls 3 one was as effective as the others.
  • 13. Feedback 3 • What did you like about the product? • I liked a few of the magazine covers and enjoyed the double page spread ideas. The website was good and looked informative. The logo was also very well done and looked professional and stood out amongst other logos on the market, it also didn’t match any colours that other big companies have used. • What improvements could have been made to the product? • There isn’t really a lot of improvements to this product as thought it was very good. Only one striking one I could think of though was probably the dark souls 3 review page as it just didn’t compare the greatness of the other two. So maybe if the person spent a bit more time on it, it may have been better.
  • 14. Peer Feedback Summary • What do you agree with from your peer feedback? • I agree with a lot of what people have said about my feedback: I liked and agreed with the fact that people are stating that I am including a lot of information within my magazine and website, I also agree with how people have said that my logo looks and seems very professional as that was the look I was intending for. All the feedback presented about the logo was all positive and agreed with all of it. I agree with the fact that one person liked my opinions and thoughts throughout my work, as that was one of the things I was most concerned about. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? • I would disagree with a few things from my peer feedback, one of those things being the information of my website, as I thought that the information I included was relevant and important and didn’t go over the top and overwhelm my viewers. Another thing I disagreed with was the no paragraphing and the bad skills used on the “Dark Souls 3” review page. As I feel as though to criticise that, is a little harsh and unfair. As the work and the information included was good and the paragraphing was fair in my opinion. Also I think that the Dark souls 3 page was on par with the rest of the work that I was producing and I wasn’t rushing to finish it, like one person suggested.
  • 15. Peer Feedback Summary The changes that I would make based upon my peer feedback would be the page that people didn’t really enjoy as it didn’t really match up to the rest of my work. As looking back on it I can understand the problem of the dark souls 3 page, it did look a bit rushed and a bit different to the rest of the work I produced. So if I could go back I would change that and make it look a bit more presentable than it already does. Another change I would make would probably be the fact that I could include more information on my website as looking back on it did look a bit sparse and a bit bare, instead of a informative website that I originally wanted to produce. I think changing it would make the website look more appropriate and look more symbolic of an actual website, as looking at it at the minute it just looks image based and empty. Another change I would also do would be to include a internal link from my magazine to my website as that would have added professionalism and made my product as a whole look better and more beneficial to the rest of my products. Also having a internal link onto my magazine would have been a great idea to advertise my website and get more people to view it, which would have helped me get my product out there.

Editor's Notes

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
  5. Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Refer to your findings from your questionnaire. Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?