This document summarizes Joshua Blakeley's evaluation of a production process project. It includes sections on research, planning, time management, technical and aesthetic qualities, audience appeal, and peer feedback. The peer feedback was generally positive and suggested adding more photos to provide more content. Joshua agrees more content would have improved the project and would include more photos in the future.
This is a presentation on Evaluation Question 7 - Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
This is a presentation on Evaluation Question 7 - Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
3. Research
• Strengths
– I got to experiment with different styles of research.
– I got to see peoples’ different opinions of certain topics. (Photography)
– I got to learn about different research techniques.
• Weaknesses
– It took time to get results for the specific styles of research. (Surveys)
– The results weren’t exactly what I was looking for.
– Each type of research takes time to create and use later in the project.
• How could I do better next time?
– I feel next time I would put a lot more effort into my work and use my time effectively as
during this project I got stuck for a week and did practically nothing for that amount of
time. I also left something very last minute, like the final product.
– Make sure I'm on top of my work so I don’t get swamped with work to do all at once and
make sure that I constantly backup my work. Also make sure my work is up to a good
standard.
4. Planning
• Strengths:
– It gave me a real idea on what I wanted to do with my work.
– I got to experience something new, which can sometimes be a challenge.
– I got to learn about different planning styles.
• Weaknesses:
– Each planning process had to be used differently.
– It was hard to come up with points of the 3 ideas, and the 3 ideas itself.
– Each idea had to be completely different.
– Each idea had to have a significant amount of ideas around them.
• What could I do better next time?
• Next time I could go into the work with more knowledge with ideas and
different types of planning rather than just sticking with mind maps, and
actually experimenting with different styles of planning.
5. Time Management
• Did I manage my time well?
– No I didn’t. When I made the timetable for the final production I didn’t use it
at all due to not having the equipment, but also I left it very last second.
• Did I complete the project on time?
– Yes I did. I came in to college on a study day and completely finished the
production part of the project, which made this easier because I got into gear
and knuckled down.
• Would my product improve with more time?
– No because I did most of my work very last second, I reckon that if I really
focused I could have made it better but I don’t think I needed additional time.
– Also I think that I could have improved my work with additional time but I rally
think I should have actually done the work.
6. Technical Qualities
• Similarities:
• Both pages include edited
photos, that are originals.
• Each page has a
minimalistic design behind
it.
• The fonts are relatively
similar.
• Differences:
• The colour scheme is a polar
opposite.
• My page includes text to
back the photos while the
one on the left just shows
photos.
• The master head is in
different places.
7. Aesthetic Qualities
• Does my work look good?
– In my opinion I think it’s a very good standard and I believe I did the work to the
best of my ability.
• Strengths
– One strength is that I can take away other ideas to apply in different projects.
– Its appealing for people to appreciate.
• Weaknesses
– It takes a lot of time to come up with solid ideas, for colour schemes etc.
– It took time to collect each shot, and make it perfect for the ideas I came up with.
The positioning of the photos is in a
good place because it gives room for
people to see the original and the
after edit, while reading the text to go
with it.
8. Audience Appeal
• How have you appealed to your target audience?
– My target audience was pretty much anyone because it doesn’t matter
about who you are to enjoy photography.
– I made sure that people got to see what bokeh photography is
because people always just call it ‘The Blurry One’, which shouldn’t
stand as it is a very frequent style of photography.
10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– I like the Bokeh part of the portfolio as I didn’t
know the name of that style of picture. It brings
up that people call it “That blurry one” and I
found that amusing
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– I think the last photo could have been improved
by using a local area or maybe the Minster.
11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– It was different from other photography and this
made it interesting, they were carefully taken and
the outcome was beautiful.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– As it is something different, you could make the
pictures look a little more abstract or take pictures
of more different things to make it even more
interesting than it already is.
12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked how you showed the before and after of the
photos you took to show your editing skills. I also
liked that the photography was different to other
photography making it unique.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Because it has a lot of writing to it, maybe adding
more photos to it to give more of content.
13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
– I agree that I should have added more content,
which would have made it better because the
more content the better.
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
– I disagree that there was too much writing
because the writing went into depth for each
photo and the reasoning/motive behind it.
14. Peer Feedback Summary
• What changes would I make to my product
based upon peer feedback & why?
– I think I would definitely use more photos, as in
the minimalist page, I had many more photos I
could have used, but the opportunity never
happened because I think that there being more
content the works standard would have increased
as there would be more to see and more to
create.
Editor's Notes
What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product?
What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product?
What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time?
What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product
Use text boxes and arrows
Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it?
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them
Use text boxes and arrows
How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience.
Refer to your findings from your questionnaire.
Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them
Use text boxes and arrows
What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?