SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 108
The Union in Peril
 1850-1862
Learning Goal: Trace the development and evaluate the resolution of the
contest between states’ rights and the abolition of slavery, from the
sectional crisis (identify key Congressional legislation and significant events
relevant to slavery & states’ rights including the Missouri
Compromise, nullification crisis, Compromise of 1850)
Cristo Rey Benchmark: 9.11.4            P

     THE DIVISIVE POLITICS OF SLAVERY
Warm Up- Focus & Motivate
• What kinds of differences could lead to problems in the unity
  of a country?
• What were the main industries in the North?
• How was the South dependent on slavery?
Senator John C. Calhoun
• SC Senator- so sick; missed 4 mo. Of debate over whether CA
  should enter the Union as a free state.
• March 4, 1850- Calhoun asked Sen. James M. Mason [VA] to
  deliver a speech due to illness
Differences between North and
 South
               North                                   South
                                        • Remained predominantly rural- mostly
• Industrialized rapidly as factories     plantations & small farms
  turned out ever-increasing            • Economy relied on cotton
  amounts of products, from
  textiles and sewing machines to       • 1/3 of the nation’s population lived in
  farm equipment and guns.                the South in 1850
• Railroads- with more than             • Produced under 10% of the nation’s
                                          manufactured goods
  20,000 miles of track laid during
  the 1850s                             • Few immigrants due to slave labor
• Immigrants from Europe                • German-American newspapers in TX
  entered the industrial workplace        and Baltimore- editorials in favor of
                                          universal voting rights and freedom for
  in growing numbers                      slaves
• Many became voters with a             • MS, LA, SC- African Americans in the
  strong opposition to slavery            majority
• Feared slavery because it might       • Alabama and FL- African Americans ½
  compete with free labor                 of the pop.
• Second, it threatened to reduce       • Whites Feared restriction of slavery
  the status of white workers             would lead to social & economic
                                          revolution
Review- Contrasting 
• List three ways in      • Answer: The North had
  which the North and       an industrial rather
  the South differed in     than agricultural
  the mid 1800s.            economy; the North
                            mostly opposed
                            slavery, while the
                            South relied on slave
                            labor; the North had
                            more urban growth as
                            well as more growth in
                            immigrant population.
Slavery in the Territories
• August 8th, 1846- PA Dem. David Wilmot heightened tensions
  between the North & South by proposing:
• Wilmot Proviso- an amendment to an 1846 military
  appropriations bill, proposing that none of the territory
  acquired in the war with Mexico would be open to slavery.
• Proviso divided Congress along regional lines
  • Northerners, angry over the refusal of Southern congressmen to
    vote for internal improvements supported the proviso
  • Southerners opposed the proviso- arguing it raised complex
    constitutional issues. Slaves were property and property was
    protected under the Constitution
• HoR approved the Proviso, the Senate rejected it
• Everyone feared a shift in the balance of free/slave states
Review- Analyzing Motives 
• Explain why           • Answer: Northerners
  Northerners favored     wanted to prevent the
  the Wilmot Proviso      expansion of slavery
  and why Southerners     into the
  did not.                territories, because it
                          might cause more
                          slave states to enter
                          the Union. Southerners
                          did not want Congress
                          decided the issue of
                          slavery.
Review- Synthesizing 
• How was the Wilmot         • The concept of national
  Proviso intertwined with     expansion meant an addition
  Manifest Destiny?            of states into the union.
                               Therefore the South was
                               determined to keep at least a
                               political balance in the Senate
                               between free and slaves
                               states. The Wilmot Proviso- if
                               accepted would have
                               destroyed the chances of the
                               South.

                             • Furthermore, the South could
                               use the states’ rights
                               argument, that the territories
                               belonged to the states united
                               rather than the United States.
The Wilmot Proviso was
seen as a stumbling block
for Presidential
candidates, such as Taylor
Statehood for California
• Due to the California Gold Rush, CA population grew so quickly it
  skipped the territorial phase of becoming a state
• Late 1849- CA had a constitutional convention, adopted a state
  constitution, elected a governor and a legislation, and applied to join
  the Union.
• Constitution forbade slavery, alarming Southerners
• Assumed b/c CA lay south of the Missouri Compromise line, it would
  be open to slavery.
• Hoped that the compromise of 1820 would apply to new territories
• Gen. Zachary Taylor who succeeded Polk as president in
  1849, supported CA’s admission as a free state.
• Felt the South could counter abolitionism by leaving the slavery
  issue up to individual territories rather than Congress
• Southerners saw this as a move to block slavery in the territories
  and as an attack on Southern life.
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• Why did California’s   • Answer: Although
  application for          most California
  statehood cause an       voters opposed
  uproar?                  slavery, most of the
                           state lay south of the
                           Missouri
                           Compromise
                           line, and therefore
                           legally should have
                           been open to slavery
The Senate Debates
• 31st Congress opened in Dec. 1849 w/
  distrust & bitterness
• CA statehood on the agenda
• Border dispute of slave state Texas’
  claim of ½ of NM territory
• Northerners demanded the abolition
  of slavery in D.C.
• South accused North of failing to
  enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793
• South threatened secession- the
  formal withdrawal of a state from the
  Union.
Clay’s Compromise
               • Obtained his rival- Daniel
                 Webster’s support on Jan.
                 21st, 1850
               • Though ill- 8 days later
                 delivered a series of
                 resolutions hoping to settle
                 “all questions in controversy
                 between the free and slave
                 states, growing out of the
                 subject of slaver”
               • Compromise of 1850 n. a
                 series of congressional
                 measures intended to settle
                 the major disagreements
                 between free states and slave
                 states.
Terms of the Compromise
•   Contained provisions to appease Northerners as well as Southerners
•   North- provided that CA be admitted to the Union as a free state
•   South- proposed a new and more effective fugitive slave law
•   Proposed a provision for NM and Utah territories: popular
    sovereignty n. a system in which the residents vote to decide an
    issue.
•   Popular Sovereignty appealed to N. and S.
•   Federal government would pay Texas $10million to surrender its
    claim to NM.
•   Northerners pleased, b/c it limited slavery in Texas to within its
    current borders
•   Southerners pleased because the money would help defray Texas’
    expenses and debts from the war with Mexico
Review- Comparing 
• What Northern issues    • Answer: North: The
  and Southern issues       banning of slavery in
  were addressed by the     Cal.; the restricting of
  Compromise of 1850?       slavery in Texas so that
                            it would not include
                            NM.
                          • South: a tougher
                            fugitive slave law;
                            money to defray the
                            costs of the War with
                            Mexico
                          • Both: popular
                            sovereignty
Analyzing Primary Documents
Henry Clay takes the floor of the Old
Senate Chamber; Vice President Millard
Fillmore presides as he, Calhoun, and
Webster look on.
Calhoun & Webster Respond
• Clay’s speech marked the start of one of the greatest political
  debates in U.S. history
• Within a month- Calhoun presented the Southern case for
  slavery in the territories
• Followed 3 days later by Daniel Webster, who began his
  eloquent appeal for national unity by saying: “I wish to speak
  today, not as a Massachusetts man, nor as a Northern
  man, but as an American… ‘Hear me for my cause”.
• Urged Northerners to try to compromise with the South by
  passing a stricter fugitive slave law, warned Southern
  firebrands to think more cautiously about the danger of
  secession.
Review- Interpreting Charts 
• 1- Calhoun believed    • 2- The compromise
  that maintaining         had strong
  states’ rights was       protections and
  more important than      strong restrictions of
  preserving the           slavery
  Union; Webster
  believed the reverse
  was true.
Showdown in the Senate
The Compromise is Rejected
• Senate rejected the proposed compromise
  in July
• Clay left Washington; Stephen A. Douglas of
  Illinois picked up the pro-compromise reins
• Douglas developed a shrewd plan
• Unbundled the package of resolutions and
  reintroduced them one at a time- hoping to
  obtain a majority vote for each measure
  individually
• The hope was any individual congressman
  could vote for the provisions that he liked
  and vote against, or abstain from voting
  on, those he disliked.
Welcome to the
 Presidency, Millard Fillmore
• Unexpected death of Taylor
  on July 9th aided Douglas’
  efforts
• Taylor’s successor, Millard
  Fillmore, made it clear he
  supported the compromise
• South was ready to
  negotiate in the wake of
  Calhoun’s death
• Southern leaders came out
  in favor of Clay’s individual
  proposals as being the best
  the South could secure
  without radical action
• 1850- the Compromise was
  voted into law.
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• What was the result    • Answer: The
  of Douglas’              compromise passed
  unbundling of Clay’s     because each
  resolutions?             provision had enough
                           support from either
                           the North or the
                           South to pass when
                           voted separately.
Fillmore’s next act
• Fillmore embraced the compromise as the “final settlement”
  of the question of slavery and sectional differences
• For the moment the crisis was over
• However relief was short-lived
• The next crisis loomed ominously- the enforcement of the
  new fugitive slave law.
Summarizer
• Do you think there are any points at which a different action
  or leader might have resolved the conflict between the North
  and the South?
• Support your opinion with references from this section.
• Think about:
  • Issues raised by the Wilmot Proviso, California statehood and the
    Compromise of 1850
  • Constitutional issues raised by Southerners
Protest, Resistance
     and Violence
Learning Goal NJCCCS: 6.1.8.D.4.c
Explain the growing resistance to slavery
and New Jersey’s role in the
Underground Railroad.
Warm up- Focus & Motivation
• List the challenges of the journey and the risks faced by slaves
  escaping to the North.
The story of Anthony Burns
• June 2nd, 1854: Thousands
  lined the streets of Boston
• Black coffin bearing the
  words: “The Funeral of
  Liberty”
• Federal soldiers marched
  African American, Anthony
  Burns, toward the harbor
• Burns was being forced back
  into slavery in VA
• As a result of his
  trial, antislavery sentiment in
  the North soared
• “We went to bed one night
  old-
  fashioned, conservative, comp
  romise Union Whigs and
  waked up stark mad
Fugitive Slaves
• Fugitive Slave Act n. a law enacted as part of the Compromise
  of 1850, designed to ensure that escaped slaves would be
  returned into bondage.
• Under the law, alleged fugitives were not entitled to a trial by
  jury, despite the 6th Amendment
• Fugitives could not testify on their behalf
• A statement by a slave owner was all that was required to
  have a slave returned
• Federal commissioners charged with enforcing the law were to
  receive a $10 fee if they returned an alleged fugitive
• Only $5 if they freed him/her
• Anyone convicted of helping a fugitive was subjected to a fine
  of $1,000 or imprisoned for 6 mos. Sometimes both occured
Frederick Douglas- Fugitive
Slave Act
Resisting the Law
• Northerners resisted it by organizing
  vigilance committees to send endangered
  African Americans to safety in Canada.
• Others resorted to violence to rescue fugitive
  slaves.
• personal liberty laws- n. statutes, passed in
  nine Northern states in the 1850s, that
  forbade the imprisonment of runaway slaves
  and guaranteed jury trials for fugitive slaves.
• Northern lawyers dragged these trials out-
  often for three or four years- in order to
  increase slave catchers’ expenses.
• Southern slave owners were enraged by
  Northern resistance.
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• What effect did the      • Answer: It created a
  Fugitive Slave Act         great deal of
  have on abolitionist       hardship and
  feelings in the North?     resentment and
                             resulted in some
                             people turning to
                             violent resistance
The Underground Railroad
• African Americans and white
  abolitionists developed a
  secret network of people who
  would, at great risk to
  themselves, aid fugitive slaves
  in their escape.
• Underground Railroad- n. a
  system of routes along which
  runaway slaves were helped
  to escape to Canada or to
  safe areas in the free states.
• “Conductors” hid fugitives in
  secret tunnels and false
  cupboard, provided them
  with food and clothing, and
  escorted or directed them to
  the next “station” often in
  disguise.
Harriet Tubman
                 • Most famous conductor
                 • Born a slave in 1820 or 1821
                 • Suffered a severe head injury
                   as a child when a plantation
                   overseer hit her with a lead
                   weight
                 • Blow to the brain causes her
                   to lose consciousness several
                   times a day
                 • To compensate, she
                   increased her strength
                   tremendously
                 • 1849- after Tubman's owner
                   died, she made a break for
                   freedom and succeeded in
                   reaching Philly, PA.
From slave to “Moses”
• After the passage of the
  Fugitive Slave Act, Tubman   • Escaping slavery was
  became a conductor on          dangerous
  the Underground Railroad
                               • Travelling on foot at night
• 19 trips back to the           without any sense of
  South, helped 300 slaves       distance or direction except
  including her parents          for the North Star and
• Later became a speaker for     other natural signs
  abolition                    • Had to avoid patrols of
                                 armed men on horses
                                 without food for days
                               • Once they reached the
                                 North, many remained to
                                 take their chances or went
                                 to Canada
New Jersey & the Underground
 Railroad
• Situated on the lower Delaware River, western coast of South
  Jersey was a crossing point for people escaping Maryland and
  Virginia.
• Home to many Quakers, known abolitionists
• Free black communities that became havens for escaped brethren
• Lawnside in Camden County was one, originally named Freehaven
• Peter Mott House in Lawnside is an existing Underground Railroad
  Station operated by an African American- is now a museum
• William Still, a free man from Burlington County, NJ became a
  member of the PA Anti-Slavery Society and managed the
  committee’s finances used to assist Harriet Tubman’s rescue efforts
• Network operated from Cumberland to Hudson County or 180-
  miles
William Still & NJ
Review- Summarizing 
• How did the         • Answer:
  Underground           “Conductors” would
  Railroad operate?     hide fugitive slaves
                        and help them work
                        their way north from
                        one “station” to the
                        next.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin
• 1852- ardent abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe published
  Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
• Stirring strong reactions from the North and South alike, the
  novel became an instant bestseller.
• More than a million copies had sold by the middle of 1853.
• Plot- melodramatic and many characters were
  stereotypes, however the message that slavery was not just a
  political content, but a great moral struggle remained
• Story- Eliza, a slave, fled across the frozen Ohio River, clutching
  her infant son in her arms
• They wept bitterly when Simon Legree, a northern slave
  owner, moved to the South, bought Uncle Tom and had him
  whipped to death
Response to Uncle Tom’s Cabin
• Northerners increased their protests of the Fugitive Slave
  Act, while Southerners criticized the book as an attack on the
  South as a whole
• The furor had barely begun to settle when a new controversy
  hit.
Side Deals reopen a fresh
wound
• Issue of slavery in the newly acquired territories surfaced
  again
• Sen. Stephen Douglas, who helped steer the Compromise of
  1850 into fruition, inadvertently resurrected the issue
• 1844- Douglas pushed to organize the huge territory west of
  Iowa and Missouri
• 1854- developed a proposal to divide the area into 2
  territories, Nebraska and Kansas.
• Motives were complicated- a desire to push construction of a
  railroad between Chicago and San Francisco [he owned real
  estate in both] meant he had to make a deal with
  Southerners, who wanted the railroad to start in Memphis or
  New Orleans
Popular Sovereignty and
Nebraska
• Douglas wanted to organize the western territory because he
  believed that most of the nation’s people wished to see the western
  lands incorporated into the Union
• Douglas was sure that continued expansion would strengthen the
  Democratic party and unify the nation.
• Also believed that Popular sovereignty- meant that the sovereign
  people of a territory should determine the statues of slavery. It was
  popular with politicians because it was a comfortable compromise
  between the abolitionists and the slave-holders.
• Only difficulty was that Nebraska Territory lay north of the Missouri
  Compromise line
• Douglas assumed that Nebraska would enter the Union as 2 states-
  one slave and one free, thus maintaining the balance in the Senate
A blow to shaky ground
• Douglas was convinced that slavery could not exist on the open
  prairies since none of the crops relying on slave labor grew there
• To win over the South, Douglas decided to support the repeal of the
  Missouri Compromise- though he predicted it would create “a
  storm” in Congress.
• January 23rd, 1854- Douglas introduced a bill in Congress to divide
  the area into 2 territories: Nebraska in the North, Kansas in the
  South
• If passed, it would repeal the Missouri Compromise and establish
  popular sovereignty for both territories.
• Congressional debate was bitter however 90
• 5 of Southern congressmen voted for the bill
• General population deluged Congress with petitions for and against
  the bill
• In the North, Douglas became a social pariah for the bill but did not
  waiver claiming this was a democratic way to resolve the issue of
  slavery
Review- Analyzing Issues 
• Explain why popular   • Answer: It was
  sovereignty was so      controversial because
  controversial.          it meant a repeal of
                          the Missouri
                          Compromise, and
                          meant that any new
                          state might become a
                          slavery state.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act
• With the help of President
  Franklin Pierce, a
  democrat- Douglas steered
  his proposal through the
  Senate
• Kansas-Nebraska Act n. a
  law, enacted in 1854, that
  established the territories
  of Kansas and Nebraska
  and gave their residents
  the right to decide whether
  to allow slavery.
• All eyes turned westward
  as the fate of the new
  territories hung in the
  balance
Violence Erupts in “Bleeding
Kansas”
•   The race for the possession of Kansas was on
•   NY Senator, William Seward threw down the gauntlet
•   Settlers from North & South began pouring into the Kansas Territory
•   Some were farmers in search of new land
•   Most were sent by emigrant aid societies, groups formed specially to
    supply rifles, animals, seed, and farm equipment to antislavery
    migrants
•   By March, 1855- Kansas had enough settlers to hold an election for a
    territorial legislature
•   Thousands of “border ruffians” from the slave state Missouri led by
    Sen. David Atchison, crossed into Kansas with their revolvers cocked
    and voted illegally
•   They won a fraudulent majority for proslavery candidates who set
    up a government at Lecompton
•   Abolitionists organized a rival government in Topeka in fall 1855
Review- Analyzing Causes 
• Why did Kansas         • Answer: Because the
  become a center of       Kansas-Nebraska Act
  controversy over the     opened the territory
  issue of slavery?        to slavery, and both
                           pro-and antislavery
                           forces settled in
                           Kansas and fought for
                           control of its
                           territorial
                           government
“The Sack of Lawrence”
• Violence surfaced in the
  struggle for Kansas
• Antislavery settlers
  founded Lawrence
• Proslavery grant jury
  condemned Lawrence’s
  inhabitants as traitors and
  called on the local sheriff
  to arrest them
• May 21, 1856- a proslavery
  posse burned down the
  antislavery HQ, destroyed
  2 newspapers’ printing
  presses, and looted many
  houses and stores.
“The Pottawatomie Massacre”
• News from Lawrence reached, John Brown, an abolitionist described
  as a “man made of the stuff of saints”.
• Brown believed God called on him to fight slavery
• Had the mistaken impression that the proslavery posse killed 5 men
• Brown was set on revenge
• May 24th, he & his followers pulled 5 men from their beds in the
  proslavery settlement of Pottawatomie Creek, hacked off their
  heads, and stabbed them with broadswords
• Quickly led to cries for revenge
• It became the bloody shirt that proslavery Kansas settlers waved in
  summoning attacks on Free-Soilers
• Massacre triggered dozens of incidents throughout Kansas
• 200 people were killed
• John Brown fled Kansas, but left behind men and women who lived
  with rifles by their sides
Violence in the Senate
• May 19th Massachusetts senator Charles Sumner delivered in the
  Senate an impassion speech: “The Crime Against Kansas”
• For 2 days he verbally attacked his colleagues for their support of
  slavery.
• Sumner was particularly abusive toward the aged senator Andrew P.
  Butler of SC, sneering at him for his proslavery beliefs and making
  fun of his impaired speech
• May 22nd, Butler’s nephew, Congressman Preston S. Brooks walked
  in the Senate chamber and over to Sumner’s desk
• “I have read your speech twice over, carefully. It is a libel on SC and
  Mr. Butler, who is a relative of mine”
• Lifted his cane and struck Sumner on the head repeatedly before the
  cane broke
• Sumner suffered shock and brain damage and did not return for
  three years
• Southerners applauded and showered Brooks with new canes saying
  “Hit him again”
• Northerners condemned the incident as an example of Southern
  brutality and antagonism over free speech
Southern Chivalry: Argument versus Club’s, 1856
This cartoon depicts South Carolina Representative Preston Brooks
striking Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner with his cane.
Brooks attacked him in retaliation for a speech that Sumner
delivered berating Brooks’s relative, Senator Andrew Butler of
South Carolina. The violent episode fueled antipathy between anti-
slavery northerners and pro-slavery southerners.
Review- Summarizing 
• Describe Northern    • Answer: The South
  and Southern           saw Brooks as a hero
  reactions to the       who defended the
  incident between       honor of his family
  Brooks and Sumner.     and state; the North
                         saw the incident as
                         an act of brutality
Summarizer
• Identify the
  significance of the
  following:
  •   Fugitive Slave Act
  •   Personal liberty laws
  •   Underground Railroad
  •   Harriet Tubman
  •   Harriet Beecher Stowe
  •   Uncle Tom’s Cabin
  •   Kansas-Nebraska Act
  •   “Bleeding Kansas”
  •   Senator Sumner
The Birth of the
Republican Party
Learning Goal: NJCCCS 6.1.12.A.3.g - Determine the extent
to which state and local issues, the press, the rise of
interest- group politics, and the rise of party politics
impacted the development of democratic institutions and
practices.
Warm Up- Focus & Motivate
• What advantages are there in having the two-party system we
  have today?
• What would be the advantages and disadvantages if there
  were more than 2 parties?
New Political Parties Emerge
• End of 1856- political
  landscaped shifted
• Whig Party split over
  slavery and the
  Democratic party
  was weak
• Left the new
  Republican Party to
  move within striking
  distance of the
  presidency
Slavery Divides Whigs
             • Divisions within the Whig Party
               widened in 1852 when Gen.
               Winfield Scott became the Whig
               nominee for president.
             • Scott owed his nomination to
               Northern Whigs who opposed the
               Fugitive Slave Act and gave only
               lukewarm support to the
               Compromise of 1850, Southern
               Whigs however backed the
               compromise in order to appear both
               proslavery and pro-Union
             • Due to Scott’s position, the Whig
               vote in the South fell from 50% in
               1848 to 35% in 1852 allowing the
               Democratic candidate Franklin
               Pierce to win the election
             • The Kansas-Nebraska Act ruined the
               Whig party irreversibly splitting
               Southern and Northern members
Nativism
• Alternatives to the Whig party included the American Party which
  had roots in a secret organization known as the Order of the Star-
  Spangled Banner.
• Members of the society believed in nativism- n. favoring the
  interests of native-born people over foreign-born people.
• Using secret handshakes and passwords, members were told to
  respond to questions about their activities by saying: “I know
  nothing” by 1854 it became known as the Know-Nothing Party [n. a
  name given to the American Party, formed in the 1850s to curtail the
  political influence of immigrants.]
• Primarily middle-class Protestants- they were dismayed by the total
  # of new immigrants and the # of Catholics among them
• Catholic immigrants, according to nativists, during 1830s/1840s
  were influenced by the Pope and could form a conspiracy to
  overthrow democracy
• While the Democratic Party courted immigrant voters, nativists
  voted for Know-Nothing candidates.
• Did surprisingly well in polls during 1854 but were split over slavery
• Northern Know-Nothings began to edge toward the Republican
  Party
Review- Analyzing Causes 
• What impact did the     • Answer: The slavery
  slavery issue have on     issue had caused a
  the Democratic and        split in the Whig
  Whig parties?             Party; the
                            Democratic Party
                            was scarred
Antislavery Parties Form
• 2 forerunners of the         • 1848- the Free Soil Party-
  Republican Party               n. a political party formed
  emerged during the             in 1848 to oppose the
  1840s                          extension of slavery into
                                 U.S. territories.
• 1844- tiny abolitionist
  party- Liberty Party-        • Nominated former
  whose purpose was to           president Martin Van
  create/pass new                Buren
  abolitionist laws            • Failed to win any electoral
• Received only a small %        votes in 1848, received
  of votes to throw the          10% of the popular vote
  election to Polk over Clay   • Sent a clear message that
                                 even some Northerners
                                 did not favor
                                 abolition, however they
                                 definitely opposed the
                                 extension of slaves in the
The Free-Soilers
• Included many N. who were not
  abolitionists
• # of N. Free-Soilers supported the
  prohibition of black settlement in
  their communities and denying
  blacks the right to vote
• Free-soilers objected to slavery’s
  impact on free white workers in
  the wage-based labor force, upon
  which the North depended
• Abolitionist William Lloyd
  Garrison considered the Free-Soil
  Party a “sign of discontent with
  things political… reaching for
  something better… it is a party for
  keeping Free Soil and not for
  setting men free”
Fears of the Free-Soilers
• Detected a dangerous pattern in such events as the passage of
  the Fugitive Slave Act and the repeal of the Missouri
  Compromise
• Convinced that a conspiracy existed on the part of the
  “diabolical slave power” to spread slavery throughout the
  U.S.A.
• Something or someone, according to the Free-Soilers, had to
  prevent this spread.
Review- Analyzing Motives 
• Why did most Free-   • Answer: Most Free-
  Soilers object to      Soilers objected to
  slavery?               slavery because they
                         believed that white
                         workers could not
                         get jobs in
                         competition with
                         slaves.
Republican Party
• In February 1854, @ a school house in Ripon, WI, some discontented
  N. Whigs held a mtg. w/ antislavery Dems & Free-Soilers to form a new
  political party
• on July 6th – The Republican Party- n. the modern political party that
  was formed in 1854 by opponents of slavery in the territories.
• Formed and organized in Jackson Michigan including one of the
  founders Horace Greeley
• united in opposing the Kansas-Nebraska Actand in keeping slavery out
  of the territories
• Embraced a wide range of opinions
• Conservative members wanted to resurrect the Missouri Compromise
• Opposite were the radical abolitionists
• Drew support from diverse groups and had strength to win a political
  tug of war with other parties
Main Competition
• Main competition for Republicans was the Know-Nothing
  Party
• Both targeted the same groups of voters
• 1855- Republicans had set up party organizations in about ½
  of the N. states but lacked national organization
• In Quick succession- fraudulent territorial election in
  Kasas, sack, massacre, caning leading to issues Republicans
  needed to challenge the Democrats for the presidency in 1856
• Republicans chose John C. Frémont, famed “pathfinder” who
  mapped the Oregon Trail and led U.S. troops into CA during
  Mexican War
• Know-Nothings split their allegiance with N. endorsing
  Frémont and S. selecting Fillmore even though the Whigs
  were dissolved
Enter: Buchanan
• Democrats nominated James
  Buchanan of PA a N. with many
  S. friends
• As minister to GB- he was out
  of the country during Kansas-
  Nebraska thus he did not
  antagonize any side
• To balance the N. and the S.
  Democrats chose John C.
  Breckinridge as his running
  mate
• Although he received only 45%
  of the popular vote- he won
  the S. except MD
• Result- Know-Nothings in
  decline, Republicans gaining
  power
The Life of Buchanan
• “life-long bachelor”            • Lived with Alabama
• According to historian Lisa       Senator- William R.
  Manhart, Buchanan                 King, VP under Pierce
  “committed an unspecified       • Relationship was so
  indiscretion that anger his       close, Andrew Jackson
  intended bride, and she           called King: “Miss Nancy”
  broke of their                    and “Aunt Fancy”
  engagement”                     • Others referred to the two
• Family forbade James from         as “Buchanan and his wife”
  attending his funeral
• Niece- Harriet Lane served
  as hostess fulfilling the 1st
  Lady responsibilities
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• Why was the election   • Answer: Because it
  of 1856 so important     established the party
  to the growth of the     as an alternative to
  Republican Party?        the Whigs and the
                           Democrats, and
                           showed that the
                           Republicans would
                           be powerful
                           contenders in the
                           future
Summarizer- Synthesizing
• How did the way in     • The party was united
  which the Republican     in opposing
  Party was formed         slavery, but also
  indicate that the        embraced a wide
  party stood a good       range of opinions. By
  chance at success?       drawing support
                           from conservatives
                           and radicals, it had
                           the strength to
                           overpower other
                           political parties
Slavery & Secession
Learning Goal: NJCCCS 6.1.12.A.4.a
- Analyze the ways in which prevailing
   attitudes, socioeconomic factors, and government
   actions (i.e., the Fugitive Slave Act and Dred Scott
   Decision) in the North and South (i.e., Secession) led to
   the Civil War.
[CRN- 9.11.4 ]
Warm Up: Focus & Motivate
Event         Effect
A Cautionary Speech
• June 16th, 1858- Rep. Party of Illinois nominated Abraham
  Lincoln to run for U.S. Senate against Dem. Incumbent
  Stephen A. Douglas
Questions that need answers
• Was Lincoln right
  that the Union would
  dissolve?
• Was President James
  Buchanan too weak?
• Would new legal
  questions over
  slavery implode?
Slavery Dominates Politics
• Slavery was a problem for the indecisive Pres. Buchanan
• Administration plagued by slavery-related controversies
• 1st one arose on March 6th, 1857- a case that would alter the
  course of history indefinitely
Dred Scott v. Sanford
• Facts:
  • 1857, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin
  • Dred Scott was an African-
    American slave
  • He was taken by his master from
    the slave state of Missouri to the
    free state of Illinois
  • He lived on free soil for a long
    time
  • When the Army ordered his
    master to go back to Missouri, he
    took Scott with him back to that
    slave state
• Issues:
  • Scott said that he should be free
    since he lived on free soil for such
    a long time
• Arguments:
Scott v. Sanford   • As a non-citizen many felt that
                     Scott had no rights and could not
                     sue in a federal court and
                     therefore must remain a slave.
               • Decision:
                   • Scott lost the decision as the
                     Supreme Court [under Chief
                     Justice Roger B. Taney] declared
                     no slave or descendant of a slave
                     could be a U.S. citizen
                   • The Supreme Court also ruled that
                     Congress could not stop slavery in
                     the newly emerging territories
                   • The decision enraged Abraham
                     Lincoln, and brought the nation to
                     the brink of the Civil War
               • Result
                   • Effectively repealed the Missouri
                     Compromise
                   • Declared Slaves were property
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• What was the           • Answer: It effectively
  significance of the      repealed the
  Dred Scott decision?     Missouri
                           Compromise; it
                           declared that slaves
                           were property
The Lecompton Constitution
• Fall of 1857- proslavery government at Lecompton, Kansas
  wrote a constitution and applied for admission to the Union
• Free-Soilers, outnumbered proslavery settlers in Kansas by
  nearly 10:1- rejected the constitution b/c it protected the
  rights of slaveholders
• Legis. called for a referendum in which people could vote on
  the proslavery constitution, people voted against it
• Pres. Buchanan endorsed the proslavery constitution
• Owed his presidency to S. support and believed that since
  Kansas only had 200 slaves, the Free-Soilers were overreacting
• Provoked the wrath of Dem. Stephen A. Douglas and violated
  popular sovereignty- called for another referendum
• Summer- 1858, voters rejected the constitution again
• N. hailed Douglas as a hero, S. as a traitor and split the Dem.
  party
Review- Analyzing Motives 
• Why did Buchanan   • Answer: He was trying to
  support the          appease the Southerners.
  Lecompton            He felt that the small
  constitution?        number of slaves in Kansas
                       made the issue relatively
                       unimportant.
Lincoln-Douglas Debates
     • The race for U.S. Senate in
       Illinois became a stage for a
       great political contest
     • Douglas was a 2-term senator w/
       an outstanding record and a
       large campaign chest
     • Lincoln was a self-educated man
       with a dry wit known locally as a
       successful lawyer and politician.
       Elected as a Whig to 1-term in
       Congress in 1846- he broke with
       his party after the Kansas-
       Nebraska Act
Position & Arguments
• Douglas believed in popular sovereignty
  • Did not think slavery was immoral, he did believe that it was a backward labor
    system unsuitable to prairie agriculture
• Lincoln believed that slavery was immoral
  • A labor system built on greed
• Chief difference:
  • Douglas believed that popular sovereignty would allow slavery to pass away
    on its own
  • Lincoln doubted that slavery would cease to spread without legislation
    outlawing it in the territories
• Lincoln tried to make Douglas look like a defender of slavery and of the Dred
  Scott decision
• Douglas accused Lincoln of being an abolitionist and an advocate for racial
  equality
• Lincoln stated he was not in favor of bringing social and political equality
  between races but that slavery was a moral, social, and political wrong that
  should not spread
The Freeport Doctrine
• 2nd debate held at Freeport
• Lincoln asked Douglas if the settlers of a territory could vote to
  exclude slavery before the territory became a state
• Everyone knew that the Dred Scott decision said no
• Lincoln implied that Popular Sovereignty was an empty phrase
• Douglas’ response became known as the Freeport Doctrine-
  n. the idea, expressed by Stephen Douglas in 1858, that any
  territory could exclude slavery by simply refusing to pass laws
  supporting it.
• Douglas also stated no law could be effective without local
  police regulations meaning use a loophole within Dred Scott
• Douglas won the Senate seat, but his response worsened the
  split between N. and S. wings of the Dem. Party
• Lincoln’s attacks on slavery drew national attention leading
  the Republicans to propose him as a candidate for presidency
  in 1860
Review- Comparing 
• Explain the             • Answer: Both were
  similarities and          against slavery;
  differences between       however, Lincoln
  Lincoln’s position on     thought the federal
  slavery and that of       government should
  Douglas.                  keep slavery out of
                            the territories, while
                            Douglas though the
                            states should decide.
Passions Ignite
• 1858 was a year of talk- 1859 became a year of action
• Most Americans would have welcomed a respite from slavery
• “God’s angry man”, John Brown, reemerged on the scene and
  ended all hopes of a compromise over slavery between the
  North and the South
Harpers Ferry
• While politicians debated slavery, John Brown was studying the slave
  uprisings that had occurred in ancient Rome and on the French
  island of Haiti
• Believed that the time was ripe for similar uprisings
• Secretly obtained financial backing from several prominent N.
  abolitionists
• October 16th, 1859- led 21 men, black and white into Harpers Ferry
  VA
• Aim was to seize the federal arsenal and give them to slaves in the
  area
• 60 citizens held hostage with the hope that their slaves would join-
  none came forward
• Local troops killed 8 of Brown’s men
• Detachment of U.S. Marines, led by Col. Robert E. Lee stormed the
  engine house killed 2 more raiders and captured Brown
• Brown was tried for treason in VA
John Brown’s Hanging
• Dec. 2nd, 1859- Brown was
  hanged for high treason in
  front of federal troops &
  observers
• Although condemned as a
  murderer by
  Lincoln/Douglas- many N.
  expressed admiration for
  him & his cause
• Bells tolled @ the news of
  his execution
• Guns fire salutes
• Huge crowds gathered to
  denounce the s.
• Some called Brown a matyr
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• Why did Harpers        • Answer: Southerners
  Ferry increase           feared that the North
  tensions between the     was inciting slaves to
  North and the South?     revolt, while
                           Northerners viewed
                           Brown as a martyr
                           whose abolitionist
                           cause was worthy of
                           support.
The Republican Convention- 1860
  • Took place in Chicago which had transformed itself into a
    convention city w/ more than 50 hotels and an 18,000 sq.-ft.
    wooden mtg. center named the Wigwam
  • 4,5000 person delegate floor overflowed within minutes
  • 1st day consisted of forming committees, listening to
    prayers, and gossiping about politics
  • Candidates then bargained for delegates votes
Seward and Lincoln
• Sen. William H.           • Lincoln being an
  Seward appeared to          unknown won him
  have everything             the nomination
  needed to be a              • Lincoln was moderate
  candidate                     in his views
 • Led antislavery forces     • Wanted to halt slavery
   in Congress                  expansion but would
 • Financial support of         not interfere with the
   NY                           south’s slaves
 • Desire to be center of   • South viewed him as
   attention                  a “black republican”
Nominations of 1860
• 3 major candidates vied
  for office
• Democratic Party split
  over slavery
• N. Dems- Stephen
  Douglas
• S. Dems- VP John C.
  Breckinridge
• Constitutional Union
  Party- a mix of Know-
  Nothings and Whigs
  from the south
  nominated John Bell of
  Tennesse
Review- Drawing Conclusions 
  • How did slavery         • Answer: The
    affect U.S. political     Democratic party
    parties in 1860?          split over slavery.
                              Those who felt the
                              issue was too central
                              to politics left other
                              parties and formed
                              the Constitutional
                              Union Party.
Election of
1860
Southern Secession
• Lincoln’s victory convinced S. that they had lost
  their political voice in the national government.
• Fearful that Northern Republicans would
  submit the South to subjection and bondage, S.
  states decided to act
• South Carolina led the way, seceding from the
  Union on Dec. 20th, 1860
• Mississippi followed on January 9th, 1861;
  Florida the next day
• Weeks later: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana,
  Texas seceded as well.
• The Union was dissolved
Review- Analyzing Effects 
• How did Lincoln’s     • Answer: Lincoln’s
  election affect the     election convinced
  South?                  the South that
                          Northerners
                          intended to attack
                          slavery everywhere
                          and that it was time
                          to secede.
The Shaping of the Confederacy
• Feb. 4th, 1861- delegates from the
  secessionist states met in Alabama and
  formed the Confederacy- n. the
  Confederate States of America, a
  confederation formed in 1861 by the
  Southern states after their secession
  from the Union.
• Their constitution mirrored the U.S.’s
  however it protected and recognized
  slavery in new territories
• Feb 9th delegates elected former Sen. of
  Mississippi Jefferson Davis as president
  and Alexander Stephens of GA as VP
• “The time for compromise has no
  passed” “Farewell to the Star-Spangled
  Banner” and “Dixie” became themes
The Calm Before the Storm
• As the nation awaited Lincoln’s inauguration in March, the citizens
  were confused
• 7 slave states had seceded and formed a new nation
• 8 slave states remained within the Union
  • Would they secede as well?
• Pres. Buchanan was uncertain
  • Announced that secession was illegal, but it would also be illegal for
    him to do anything about it
  • He tied his hands
• 1 problem- D.C. was very much a Southern city
• Secessionists in Congress as well as Fed. Government and
  president’s cabinet
• Mass resignations took place
• One question remained- would the North allow the South to leave
  the Union without a fight?
Summarizer- Whip Around
• States the reasons for Southern secession.

More Related Content

What's hot

Causes of the Great Depression
Causes of the Great DepressionCauses of the Great Depression
Causes of the Great DepressionMatthew Caggia
 
Cuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE History
Cuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE HistoryCuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE History
Cuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE HistoryJoanie Yeung
 
United States History Ch. 16 Section 1 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 1 NotesUnited States History Ch. 16 Section 1 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 1 Notesskorbar7
 
Westward expansion after the civil war
Westward expansion after the civil warWestward expansion after the civil war
Westward expansion after the civil warBlake Harris
 
Truth and reconciliation in South Africa
Truth and reconciliation in South Africa Truth and reconciliation in South Africa
Truth and reconciliation in South Africa EntleMorupisi
 
Berlin blockade and airlift
Berlin blockade and airliftBerlin blockade and airlift
Berlin blockade and airliftJeff Weichel
 
APUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWI
APUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWIAPUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWI
APUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWIbwellington
 
US History Ch. 3 Section 4 Notes
US History Ch. 3 Section 4 NotesUS History Ch. 3 Section 4 Notes
US History Ch. 3 Section 4 Notesskorbar7
 
Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.
Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.
Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.ThomasJennings24
 
United States History Ch. 16 Section 4 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 4 NotesUnited States History Ch. 16 Section 4 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 4 Notesskorbar7
 
United States History Ch. 15 Section 5 Notes
United States History Ch. 15 Section 5 NotesUnited States History Ch. 15 Section 5 Notes
United States History Ch. 15 Section 5 Notesskorbar7
 
APUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and Taft
APUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and TaftAPUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and Taft
APUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and Taftbwellington
 
American imperialism presentation
American imperialism presentationAmerican imperialism presentation
American imperialism presentationtar358
 
American Neutrality (WWII)
American Neutrality (WWII)American Neutrality (WWII)
American Neutrality (WWII)Tom Richey
 
United States History Ch. 16 Section 2 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 2 NotesUnited States History Ch. 16 Section 2 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 2 Notesskorbar7
 

What's hot (20)

Lbj and vietnam
Lbj and vietnamLbj and vietnam
Lbj and vietnam
 
Causes of the Great Depression
Causes of the Great DepressionCauses of the Great Depression
Causes of the Great Depression
 
Cuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE History
Cuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE HistoryCuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE History
Cuban Missile Crisis for IGCSE History
 
United States History Ch. 16 Section 1 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 1 NotesUnited States History Ch. 16 Section 1 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 1 Notes
 
Westward expansion after the civil war
Westward expansion after the civil warWestward expansion after the civil war
Westward expansion after the civil war
 
Truth and reconciliation in South Africa
Truth and reconciliation in South Africa Truth and reconciliation in South Africa
Truth and reconciliation in South Africa
 
Berlin blockade and airlift
Berlin blockade and airliftBerlin blockade and airlift
Berlin blockade and airlift
 
APUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWI
APUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWIAPUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWI
APUSH Lecture - Election of 1912, Wilson and WWI
 
Civil Rights
Civil RightsCivil Rights
Civil Rights
 
The Cold War
The Cold WarThe Cold War
The Cold War
 
US History Ch. 3 Section 4 Notes
US History Ch. 3 Section 4 NotesUS History Ch. 3 Section 4 Notes
US History Ch. 3 Section 4 Notes
 
Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.
Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.
Effects of the Depression on Different Groups in USA.
 
United States History Ch. 16 Section 4 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 4 NotesUnited States History Ch. 16 Section 4 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 4 Notes
 
United States History Ch. 15 Section 5 Notes
United States History Ch. 15 Section 5 NotesUnited States History Ch. 15 Section 5 Notes
United States History Ch. 15 Section 5 Notes
 
APUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and Taft
APUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and TaftAPUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and Taft
APUSH Lecture Ch 20 Teddy and Taft
 
The Cold War
The Cold WarThe Cold War
The Cold War
 
American imperialism presentation
American imperialism presentationAmerican imperialism presentation
American imperialism presentation
 
American Neutrality (WWII)
American Neutrality (WWII)American Neutrality (WWII)
American Neutrality (WWII)
 
United States History Ch. 16 Section 2 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 2 NotesUnited States History Ch. 16 Section 2 Notes
United States History Ch. 16 Section 2 Notes
 
Berlin blockade
Berlin blockadeBerlin blockade
Berlin blockade
 

Viewers also liked

Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865jtoma84
 
Ushonors final jeopardy
Ushonors final jeopardyUshonors final jeopardy
Ushonors final jeopardyjtoma84
 
12.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 1980
12.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 198012.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 1980
12.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 1980jtoma84
 
12.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 1968
12.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 196812.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 1968
12.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 1968jtoma84
 
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 18777.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877jtoma84
 
14.blog the age of globalization 2000 2011
14.blog the age of globalization 2000 201114.blog the age of globalization 2000 2011
14.blog the age of globalization 2000 2011jtoma84
 
Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865jtoma84
 
12.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 1964
12.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 196412.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 1964
12.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 1964jtoma84
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 2 the civil war 1861 1865
 
Ushonors final jeopardy
Ushonors final jeopardyUshonors final jeopardy
Ushonors final jeopardy
 
12.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 1980
12.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 198012.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 1980
12.3 blog.the stalemated seventies 1968 1980
 
12.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 1968
12.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 196812.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 1968
12.2.2 blog.social unrest 1964 1968
 
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 18777.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
 
14.blog the age of globalization 2000 2011
14.blog the age of globalization 2000 201114.blog the age of globalization 2000 2011
14.blog the age of globalization 2000 2011
 
Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865
Part 1 the civil war 1861 1865
 
12.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 1964
12.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 196412.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 1964
12.2 blog.kennedy and camelot 1960 1964
 

Similar to 6.3 the union in peril 1850 1861

1850s Road to Secession
1850s Road to Secession1850s Road to Secession
1850s Road to SecessionJames Henry
 
1850s roadto secession
1850s roadto secession1850s roadto secession
1850s roadto secessionJames Henry
 
1850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp01
1850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp011850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp01
1850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp01dwessler
 
Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)
Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)
Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)Craig Maggio
 
Chapter 17.1 Pp
Chapter 17.1 PpChapter 17.1 Pp
Chapter 17.1 Ppbmumby
 
Polarizing events preceding the war
Polarizing events preceding the warPolarizing events preceding the war
Polarizing events preceding the warAllison Barnette
 
Eoct review questions gps 5 8
Eoct review questions gps 5 8Eoct review questions gps 5 8
Eoct review questions gps 5 8phillipgrogers
 
Opposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group A
Opposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group AOpposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group A
Opposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group Amrsl_abington
 
7 civil war 3 days
7 civil war 3 days7 civil war 3 days
7 civil war 3 daysstacey12130
 
Events preceding the civil war
Events preceding the civil warEvents preceding the civil war
Events preceding the civil warAllison Barnette
 
1850 compromise 1 detailed
 1850 compromise 1 detailed 1850 compromise 1 detailed
1850 compromise 1 detailedvirtualcampus
 
Causes of the civil war ppt
Causes of the civil war pptCauses of the civil war ppt
Causes of the civil war pptChristopher Repp
 
The Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises Academy
The Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises AcademyThe Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises Academy
The Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises AcademyThe Ludwig von Mises Institute
 
Us history survey # 9
Us history survey # 9Us history survey # 9
Us history survey # 9Mert Dalgic
 
23.4 expansion of the united states
23.4 expansion of the united states23.4 expansion of the united states
23.4 expansion of the united statesMrAguiar
 
Events preceding the civil war(2325764)
Events preceding the civil war(2325764)Events preceding the civil war(2325764)
Events preceding the civil war(2325764)Allison Barnette
 
Causes of civil war 1 detailed
Causes of  civil war 1 detailedCauses of  civil war 1 detailed
Causes of civil war 1 detailedvirtualcampus
 

Similar to 6.3 the union in peril 1850 1861 (20)

1850s Road to Secession
1850s Road to Secession1850s Road to Secession
1850s Road to Secession
 
1850s roadto secession
1850s roadto secession1850s roadto secession
1850s roadto secession
 
1850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp01
1850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp011850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp01
1850s roadtosecession-110105065131-phpapp01
 
Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)
Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)
Us history group project (craig, nikki, and alyssa)
 
Chapter 17.1 Pp
Chapter 17.1 PpChapter 17.1 Pp
Chapter 17.1 Pp
 
Polarizing events preceding the war
Polarizing events preceding the warPolarizing events preceding the war
Polarizing events preceding the war
 
Eoct review questions gps 5 8
Eoct review questions gps 5 8Eoct review questions gps 5 8
Eoct review questions gps 5 8
 
Opposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group A
Opposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group AOpposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group A
Opposing slavery. Chris and Leah Day 4 Group A
 
U.S. History Review
U.S. History ReviewU.S. History Review
U.S. History Review
 
The US Civil War - IIA2
The US Civil War - IIA2The US Civil War - IIA2
The US Civil War - IIA2
 
7 civil war 3 days
7 civil war 3 days7 civil war 3 days
7 civil war 3 days
 
Events preceding the civil war
Events preceding the civil warEvents preceding the civil war
Events preceding the civil war
 
1850 compromise 1 detailed
 1850 compromise 1 detailed 1850 compromise 1 detailed
1850 compromise 1 detailed
 
top 100 history
top 100 history top 100 history
top 100 history
 
Causes of the civil war ppt
Causes of the civil war pptCauses of the civil war ppt
Causes of the civil war ppt
 
The Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises Academy
The Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises AcademyThe Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises Academy
The Real Causes of America's Wars, Lecture 1 with David Gordon - Mises Academy
 
Us history survey # 9
Us history survey # 9Us history survey # 9
Us history survey # 9
 
23.4 expansion of the united states
23.4 expansion of the united states23.4 expansion of the united states
23.4 expansion of the united states
 
Events preceding the civil war(2325764)
Events preceding the civil war(2325764)Events preceding the civil war(2325764)
Events preceding the civil war(2325764)
 
Causes of civil war 1 detailed
Causes of  civil war 1 detailedCauses of  civil war 1 detailed
Causes of civil war 1 detailed
 

More from jtoma84

Patriotact
PatriotactPatriotact
Patriotactjtoma84
 
Chapter 22 foreign policy and defense
Chapter 22 foreign policy and defenseChapter 22 foreign policy and defense
Chapter 22 foreign policy and defensejtoma84
 
Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01
Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01
Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01jtoma84
 
14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting
14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting
14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and votingjtoma84
 
Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01
Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01
Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01jtoma84
 
Party power point
Party power pointParty power point
Party power pointjtoma84
 
AP Review
AP ReviewAP Review
AP Reviewjtoma84
 
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_reviewAp government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_reviewjtoma84
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branchjtoma84
 
The Executive Branch
The Executive BranchThe Executive Branch
The Executive Branchjtoma84
 
Billofrights
BillofrightsBillofrights
Billofrightsjtoma84
 
3.2.principles.of.us.government
3.2.principles.of.us.government3.2.principles.of.us.government
3.2.principles.of.us.governmentjtoma84
 
3 branches1
3 branches13 branches1
3 branches1jtoma84
 
2.origins of american government
2.origins of american government2.origins of american government
2.origins of american governmentjtoma84
 
1[1].foundations of american government
1[1].foundations of american government1[1].foundations of american government
1[1].foundations of american governmentjtoma84
 
The progressive era_(1)
The progressive era_(1)The progressive era_(1)
The progressive era_(1)jtoma84
 
13.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 2000
13.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 200013.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 2000
13.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 2000jtoma84
 
12.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 1952
12.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 195212.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 1952
12.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 1952jtoma84
 
Ww2 powerpoint propaganda
Ww2 powerpoint propagandaWw2 powerpoint propaganda
Ww2 powerpoint propagandajtoma84
 
12.1.3 the holocaust
12.1.3 the holocaust12.1.3 the holocaust
12.1.3 the holocaustjtoma84
 

More from jtoma84 (20)

Patriotact
PatriotactPatriotact
Patriotact
 
Chapter 22 foreign policy and defense
Chapter 22 foreign policy and defenseChapter 22 foreign policy and defense
Chapter 22 foreign policy and defense
 
Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01
Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01
Domesticpolicy 111211171206-phpapp01
 
14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting
14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting
14. citizenship and equal justice and 17.elections and voting
 
Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01
Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01
Politicalpartiesandinterestgroups 100103012644-phpapp01
 
Party power point
Party power pointParty power point
Party power point
 
AP Review
AP ReviewAP Review
AP Review
 
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_reviewAp government the_federal_court_system_review
Ap government the_federal_court_system_review
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch
 
The Executive Branch
The Executive BranchThe Executive Branch
The Executive Branch
 
Billofrights
BillofrightsBillofrights
Billofrights
 
3.2.principles.of.us.government
3.2.principles.of.us.government3.2.principles.of.us.government
3.2.principles.of.us.government
 
3 branches1
3 branches13 branches1
3 branches1
 
2.origins of american government
2.origins of american government2.origins of american government
2.origins of american government
 
1[1].foundations of american government
1[1].foundations of american government1[1].foundations of american government
1[1].foundations of american government
 
The progressive era_(1)
The progressive era_(1)The progressive era_(1)
The progressive era_(1)
 
13.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 2000
13.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 200013.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 2000
13.blog the resurgence of conservatism 1980 2000
 
12.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 1952
12.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 195212.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 1952
12.1.4 the cold war begins 1945 1952
 
Ww2 powerpoint propaganda
Ww2 powerpoint propagandaWw2 powerpoint propaganda
Ww2 powerpoint propaganda
 
12.1.3 the holocaust
12.1.3 the holocaust12.1.3 the holocaust
12.1.3 the holocaust
 

6.3 the union in peril 1850 1861

  • 1. The Union in Peril 1850-1862
  • 2. Learning Goal: Trace the development and evaluate the resolution of the contest between states’ rights and the abolition of slavery, from the sectional crisis (identify key Congressional legislation and significant events relevant to slavery & states’ rights including the Missouri Compromise, nullification crisis, Compromise of 1850) Cristo Rey Benchmark: 9.11.4 P THE DIVISIVE POLITICS OF SLAVERY
  • 3. Warm Up- Focus & Motivate • What kinds of differences could lead to problems in the unity of a country? • What were the main industries in the North? • How was the South dependent on slavery?
  • 4. Senator John C. Calhoun • SC Senator- so sick; missed 4 mo. Of debate over whether CA should enter the Union as a free state. • March 4, 1850- Calhoun asked Sen. James M. Mason [VA] to deliver a speech due to illness
  • 5. Differences between North and South North South • Remained predominantly rural- mostly • Industrialized rapidly as factories plantations & small farms turned out ever-increasing • Economy relied on cotton amounts of products, from textiles and sewing machines to • 1/3 of the nation’s population lived in farm equipment and guns. the South in 1850 • Railroads- with more than • Produced under 10% of the nation’s manufactured goods 20,000 miles of track laid during the 1850s • Few immigrants due to slave labor • Immigrants from Europe • German-American newspapers in TX entered the industrial workplace and Baltimore- editorials in favor of universal voting rights and freedom for in growing numbers slaves • Many became voters with a • MS, LA, SC- African Americans in the strong opposition to slavery majority • Feared slavery because it might • Alabama and FL- African Americans ½ compete with free labor of the pop. • Second, it threatened to reduce • Whites Feared restriction of slavery the status of white workers would lead to social & economic revolution
  • 6. Review- Contrasting  • List three ways in • Answer: The North had which the North and an industrial rather the South differed in than agricultural the mid 1800s. economy; the North mostly opposed slavery, while the South relied on slave labor; the North had more urban growth as well as more growth in immigrant population.
  • 7. Slavery in the Territories • August 8th, 1846- PA Dem. David Wilmot heightened tensions between the North & South by proposing: • Wilmot Proviso- an amendment to an 1846 military appropriations bill, proposing that none of the territory acquired in the war with Mexico would be open to slavery. • Proviso divided Congress along regional lines • Northerners, angry over the refusal of Southern congressmen to vote for internal improvements supported the proviso • Southerners opposed the proviso- arguing it raised complex constitutional issues. Slaves were property and property was protected under the Constitution • HoR approved the Proviso, the Senate rejected it • Everyone feared a shift in the balance of free/slave states
  • 8.
  • 9. Review- Analyzing Motives  • Explain why • Answer: Northerners Northerners favored wanted to prevent the the Wilmot Proviso expansion of slavery and why Southerners into the did not. territories, because it might cause more slave states to enter the Union. Southerners did not want Congress decided the issue of slavery.
  • 10. Review- Synthesizing  • How was the Wilmot • The concept of national Proviso intertwined with expansion meant an addition Manifest Destiny? of states into the union. Therefore the South was determined to keep at least a political balance in the Senate between free and slaves states. The Wilmot Proviso- if accepted would have destroyed the chances of the South. • Furthermore, the South could use the states’ rights argument, that the territories belonged to the states united rather than the United States.
  • 11. The Wilmot Proviso was seen as a stumbling block for Presidential candidates, such as Taylor
  • 12. Statehood for California • Due to the California Gold Rush, CA population grew so quickly it skipped the territorial phase of becoming a state • Late 1849- CA had a constitutional convention, adopted a state constitution, elected a governor and a legislation, and applied to join the Union. • Constitution forbade slavery, alarming Southerners • Assumed b/c CA lay south of the Missouri Compromise line, it would be open to slavery. • Hoped that the compromise of 1820 would apply to new territories • Gen. Zachary Taylor who succeeded Polk as president in 1849, supported CA’s admission as a free state. • Felt the South could counter abolitionism by leaving the slavery issue up to individual territories rather than Congress • Southerners saw this as a move to block slavery in the territories and as an attack on Southern life.
  • 13. Review- Analyzing Effects  • Why did California’s • Answer: Although application for most California statehood cause an voters opposed uproar? slavery, most of the state lay south of the Missouri Compromise line, and therefore legally should have been open to slavery
  • 14. The Senate Debates • 31st Congress opened in Dec. 1849 w/ distrust & bitterness • CA statehood on the agenda • Border dispute of slave state Texas’ claim of ½ of NM territory • Northerners demanded the abolition of slavery in D.C. • South accused North of failing to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 • South threatened secession- the formal withdrawal of a state from the Union.
  • 15. Clay’s Compromise • Obtained his rival- Daniel Webster’s support on Jan. 21st, 1850 • Though ill- 8 days later delivered a series of resolutions hoping to settle “all questions in controversy between the free and slave states, growing out of the subject of slaver” • Compromise of 1850 n. a series of congressional measures intended to settle the major disagreements between free states and slave states.
  • 16. Terms of the Compromise • Contained provisions to appease Northerners as well as Southerners • North- provided that CA be admitted to the Union as a free state • South- proposed a new and more effective fugitive slave law • Proposed a provision for NM and Utah territories: popular sovereignty n. a system in which the residents vote to decide an issue. • Popular Sovereignty appealed to N. and S. • Federal government would pay Texas $10million to surrender its claim to NM. • Northerners pleased, b/c it limited slavery in Texas to within its current borders • Southerners pleased because the money would help defray Texas’ expenses and debts from the war with Mexico
  • 17. Review- Comparing  • What Northern issues • Answer: North: The and Southern issues banning of slavery in were addressed by the Cal.; the restricting of Compromise of 1850? slavery in Texas so that it would not include NM. • South: a tougher fugitive slave law; money to defray the costs of the War with Mexico • Both: popular sovereignty
  • 19. Henry Clay takes the floor of the Old Senate Chamber; Vice President Millard Fillmore presides as he, Calhoun, and Webster look on.
  • 20. Calhoun & Webster Respond • Clay’s speech marked the start of one of the greatest political debates in U.S. history • Within a month- Calhoun presented the Southern case for slavery in the territories • Followed 3 days later by Daniel Webster, who began his eloquent appeal for national unity by saying: “I wish to speak today, not as a Massachusetts man, nor as a Northern man, but as an American… ‘Hear me for my cause”. • Urged Northerners to try to compromise with the South by passing a stricter fugitive slave law, warned Southern firebrands to think more cautiously about the danger of secession.
  • 21.
  • 22. Review- Interpreting Charts  • 1- Calhoun believed • 2- The compromise that maintaining had strong states’ rights was protections and more important than strong restrictions of preserving the slavery Union; Webster believed the reverse was true.
  • 23. Showdown in the Senate
  • 24. The Compromise is Rejected • Senate rejected the proposed compromise in July • Clay left Washington; Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois picked up the pro-compromise reins • Douglas developed a shrewd plan • Unbundled the package of resolutions and reintroduced them one at a time- hoping to obtain a majority vote for each measure individually • The hope was any individual congressman could vote for the provisions that he liked and vote against, or abstain from voting on, those he disliked.
  • 25. Welcome to the Presidency, Millard Fillmore • Unexpected death of Taylor on July 9th aided Douglas’ efforts • Taylor’s successor, Millard Fillmore, made it clear he supported the compromise • South was ready to negotiate in the wake of Calhoun’s death • Southern leaders came out in favor of Clay’s individual proposals as being the best the South could secure without radical action • 1850- the Compromise was voted into law.
  • 26. Review- Analyzing Effects  • What was the result • Answer: The of Douglas’ compromise passed unbundling of Clay’s because each resolutions? provision had enough support from either the North or the South to pass when voted separately.
  • 27. Fillmore’s next act • Fillmore embraced the compromise as the “final settlement” of the question of slavery and sectional differences • For the moment the crisis was over • However relief was short-lived • The next crisis loomed ominously- the enforcement of the new fugitive slave law.
  • 28. Summarizer • Do you think there are any points at which a different action or leader might have resolved the conflict between the North and the South? • Support your opinion with references from this section. • Think about: • Issues raised by the Wilmot Proviso, California statehood and the Compromise of 1850 • Constitutional issues raised by Southerners
  • 29. Protest, Resistance and Violence Learning Goal NJCCCS: 6.1.8.D.4.c Explain the growing resistance to slavery and New Jersey’s role in the Underground Railroad.
  • 30. Warm up- Focus & Motivation • List the challenges of the journey and the risks faced by slaves escaping to the North.
  • 31. The story of Anthony Burns • June 2nd, 1854: Thousands lined the streets of Boston • Black coffin bearing the words: “The Funeral of Liberty” • Federal soldiers marched African American, Anthony Burns, toward the harbor • Burns was being forced back into slavery in VA • As a result of his trial, antislavery sentiment in the North soared • “We went to bed one night old- fashioned, conservative, comp romise Union Whigs and waked up stark mad
  • 32. Fugitive Slaves • Fugitive Slave Act n. a law enacted as part of the Compromise of 1850, designed to ensure that escaped slaves would be returned into bondage. • Under the law, alleged fugitives were not entitled to a trial by jury, despite the 6th Amendment • Fugitives could not testify on their behalf • A statement by a slave owner was all that was required to have a slave returned • Federal commissioners charged with enforcing the law were to receive a $10 fee if they returned an alleged fugitive • Only $5 if they freed him/her • Anyone convicted of helping a fugitive was subjected to a fine of $1,000 or imprisoned for 6 mos. Sometimes both occured
  • 34. Resisting the Law • Northerners resisted it by organizing vigilance committees to send endangered African Americans to safety in Canada. • Others resorted to violence to rescue fugitive slaves. • personal liberty laws- n. statutes, passed in nine Northern states in the 1850s, that forbade the imprisonment of runaway slaves and guaranteed jury trials for fugitive slaves. • Northern lawyers dragged these trials out- often for three or four years- in order to increase slave catchers’ expenses. • Southern slave owners were enraged by Northern resistance.
  • 35. Review- Analyzing Effects  • What effect did the • Answer: It created a Fugitive Slave Act great deal of have on abolitionist hardship and feelings in the North? resentment and resulted in some people turning to violent resistance
  • 36. The Underground Railroad • African Americans and white abolitionists developed a secret network of people who would, at great risk to themselves, aid fugitive slaves in their escape. • Underground Railroad- n. a system of routes along which runaway slaves were helped to escape to Canada or to safe areas in the free states. • “Conductors” hid fugitives in secret tunnels and false cupboard, provided them with food and clothing, and escorted or directed them to the next “station” often in disguise.
  • 37.
  • 38. Harriet Tubman • Most famous conductor • Born a slave in 1820 or 1821 • Suffered a severe head injury as a child when a plantation overseer hit her with a lead weight • Blow to the brain causes her to lose consciousness several times a day • To compensate, she increased her strength tremendously • 1849- after Tubman's owner died, she made a break for freedom and succeeded in reaching Philly, PA.
  • 39. From slave to “Moses” • After the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act, Tubman • Escaping slavery was became a conductor on dangerous the Underground Railroad • Travelling on foot at night • 19 trips back to the without any sense of South, helped 300 slaves distance or direction except including her parents for the North Star and • Later became a speaker for other natural signs abolition • Had to avoid patrols of armed men on horses without food for days • Once they reached the North, many remained to take their chances or went to Canada
  • 40. New Jersey & the Underground Railroad • Situated on the lower Delaware River, western coast of South Jersey was a crossing point for people escaping Maryland and Virginia. • Home to many Quakers, known abolitionists • Free black communities that became havens for escaped brethren • Lawnside in Camden County was one, originally named Freehaven • Peter Mott House in Lawnside is an existing Underground Railroad Station operated by an African American- is now a museum • William Still, a free man from Burlington County, NJ became a member of the PA Anti-Slavery Society and managed the committee’s finances used to assist Harriet Tubman’s rescue efforts • Network operated from Cumberland to Hudson County or 180- miles
  • 42. Review- Summarizing  • How did the • Answer: Underground “Conductors” would Railroad operate? hide fugitive slaves and help them work their way north from one “station” to the next.
  • 43. Uncle Tom’s Cabin • 1852- ardent abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe published Uncle Tom’s Cabin. • Stirring strong reactions from the North and South alike, the novel became an instant bestseller. • More than a million copies had sold by the middle of 1853. • Plot- melodramatic and many characters were stereotypes, however the message that slavery was not just a political content, but a great moral struggle remained • Story- Eliza, a slave, fled across the frozen Ohio River, clutching her infant son in her arms • They wept bitterly when Simon Legree, a northern slave owner, moved to the South, bought Uncle Tom and had him whipped to death
  • 44.
  • 45. Response to Uncle Tom’s Cabin • Northerners increased their protests of the Fugitive Slave Act, while Southerners criticized the book as an attack on the South as a whole • The furor had barely begun to settle when a new controversy hit.
  • 46. Side Deals reopen a fresh wound • Issue of slavery in the newly acquired territories surfaced again • Sen. Stephen Douglas, who helped steer the Compromise of 1850 into fruition, inadvertently resurrected the issue • 1844- Douglas pushed to organize the huge territory west of Iowa and Missouri • 1854- developed a proposal to divide the area into 2 territories, Nebraska and Kansas. • Motives were complicated- a desire to push construction of a railroad between Chicago and San Francisco [he owned real estate in both] meant he had to make a deal with Southerners, who wanted the railroad to start in Memphis or New Orleans
  • 47. Popular Sovereignty and Nebraska • Douglas wanted to organize the western territory because he believed that most of the nation’s people wished to see the western lands incorporated into the Union • Douglas was sure that continued expansion would strengthen the Democratic party and unify the nation. • Also believed that Popular sovereignty- meant that the sovereign people of a territory should determine the statues of slavery. It was popular with politicians because it was a comfortable compromise between the abolitionists and the slave-holders. • Only difficulty was that Nebraska Territory lay north of the Missouri Compromise line • Douglas assumed that Nebraska would enter the Union as 2 states- one slave and one free, thus maintaining the balance in the Senate
  • 48. A blow to shaky ground • Douglas was convinced that slavery could not exist on the open prairies since none of the crops relying on slave labor grew there • To win over the South, Douglas decided to support the repeal of the Missouri Compromise- though he predicted it would create “a storm” in Congress. • January 23rd, 1854- Douglas introduced a bill in Congress to divide the area into 2 territories: Nebraska in the North, Kansas in the South • If passed, it would repeal the Missouri Compromise and establish popular sovereignty for both territories. • Congressional debate was bitter however 90 • 5 of Southern congressmen voted for the bill • General population deluged Congress with petitions for and against the bill • In the North, Douglas became a social pariah for the bill but did not waiver claiming this was a democratic way to resolve the issue of slavery
  • 49. Review- Analyzing Issues  • Explain why popular • Answer: It was sovereignty was so controversial because controversial. it meant a repeal of the Missouri Compromise, and meant that any new state might become a slavery state.
  • 50. The Kansas-Nebraska Act • With the help of President Franklin Pierce, a democrat- Douglas steered his proposal through the Senate • Kansas-Nebraska Act n. a law, enacted in 1854, that established the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and gave their residents the right to decide whether to allow slavery. • All eyes turned westward as the fate of the new territories hung in the balance
  • 51.
  • 52. Violence Erupts in “Bleeding Kansas” • The race for the possession of Kansas was on • NY Senator, William Seward threw down the gauntlet • Settlers from North & South began pouring into the Kansas Territory • Some were farmers in search of new land • Most were sent by emigrant aid societies, groups formed specially to supply rifles, animals, seed, and farm equipment to antislavery migrants • By March, 1855- Kansas had enough settlers to hold an election for a territorial legislature • Thousands of “border ruffians” from the slave state Missouri led by Sen. David Atchison, crossed into Kansas with their revolvers cocked and voted illegally • They won a fraudulent majority for proslavery candidates who set up a government at Lecompton • Abolitionists organized a rival government in Topeka in fall 1855
  • 53. Review- Analyzing Causes  • Why did Kansas • Answer: Because the become a center of Kansas-Nebraska Act controversy over the opened the territory issue of slavery? to slavery, and both pro-and antislavery forces settled in Kansas and fought for control of its territorial government
  • 54. “The Sack of Lawrence” • Violence surfaced in the struggle for Kansas • Antislavery settlers founded Lawrence • Proslavery grant jury condemned Lawrence’s inhabitants as traitors and called on the local sheriff to arrest them • May 21, 1856- a proslavery posse burned down the antislavery HQ, destroyed 2 newspapers’ printing presses, and looted many houses and stores.
  • 55. “The Pottawatomie Massacre” • News from Lawrence reached, John Brown, an abolitionist described as a “man made of the stuff of saints”. • Brown believed God called on him to fight slavery • Had the mistaken impression that the proslavery posse killed 5 men • Brown was set on revenge • May 24th, he & his followers pulled 5 men from their beds in the proslavery settlement of Pottawatomie Creek, hacked off their heads, and stabbed them with broadswords • Quickly led to cries for revenge • It became the bloody shirt that proslavery Kansas settlers waved in summoning attacks on Free-Soilers • Massacre triggered dozens of incidents throughout Kansas • 200 people were killed • John Brown fled Kansas, but left behind men and women who lived with rifles by their sides
  • 56.
  • 57. Violence in the Senate • May 19th Massachusetts senator Charles Sumner delivered in the Senate an impassion speech: “The Crime Against Kansas” • For 2 days he verbally attacked his colleagues for their support of slavery. • Sumner was particularly abusive toward the aged senator Andrew P. Butler of SC, sneering at him for his proslavery beliefs and making fun of his impaired speech • May 22nd, Butler’s nephew, Congressman Preston S. Brooks walked in the Senate chamber and over to Sumner’s desk • “I have read your speech twice over, carefully. It is a libel on SC and Mr. Butler, who is a relative of mine” • Lifted his cane and struck Sumner on the head repeatedly before the cane broke • Sumner suffered shock and brain damage and did not return for three years • Southerners applauded and showered Brooks with new canes saying “Hit him again” • Northerners condemned the incident as an example of Southern brutality and antagonism over free speech
  • 58. Southern Chivalry: Argument versus Club’s, 1856 This cartoon depicts South Carolina Representative Preston Brooks striking Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner with his cane. Brooks attacked him in retaliation for a speech that Sumner delivered berating Brooks’s relative, Senator Andrew Butler of South Carolina. The violent episode fueled antipathy between anti- slavery northerners and pro-slavery southerners.
  • 59. Review- Summarizing  • Describe Northern • Answer: The South and Southern saw Brooks as a hero reactions to the who defended the incident between honor of his family Brooks and Sumner. and state; the North saw the incident as an act of brutality
  • 60. Summarizer • Identify the significance of the following: • Fugitive Slave Act • Personal liberty laws • Underground Railroad • Harriet Tubman • Harriet Beecher Stowe • Uncle Tom’s Cabin • Kansas-Nebraska Act • “Bleeding Kansas” • Senator Sumner
  • 61. The Birth of the Republican Party Learning Goal: NJCCCS 6.1.12.A.3.g - Determine the extent to which state and local issues, the press, the rise of interest- group politics, and the rise of party politics impacted the development of democratic institutions and practices.
  • 62. Warm Up- Focus & Motivate • What advantages are there in having the two-party system we have today? • What would be the advantages and disadvantages if there were more than 2 parties?
  • 63. New Political Parties Emerge • End of 1856- political landscaped shifted • Whig Party split over slavery and the Democratic party was weak • Left the new Republican Party to move within striking distance of the presidency
  • 64. Slavery Divides Whigs • Divisions within the Whig Party widened in 1852 when Gen. Winfield Scott became the Whig nominee for president. • Scott owed his nomination to Northern Whigs who opposed the Fugitive Slave Act and gave only lukewarm support to the Compromise of 1850, Southern Whigs however backed the compromise in order to appear both proslavery and pro-Union • Due to Scott’s position, the Whig vote in the South fell from 50% in 1848 to 35% in 1852 allowing the Democratic candidate Franklin Pierce to win the election • The Kansas-Nebraska Act ruined the Whig party irreversibly splitting Southern and Northern members
  • 65. Nativism • Alternatives to the Whig party included the American Party which had roots in a secret organization known as the Order of the Star- Spangled Banner. • Members of the society believed in nativism- n. favoring the interests of native-born people over foreign-born people. • Using secret handshakes and passwords, members were told to respond to questions about their activities by saying: “I know nothing” by 1854 it became known as the Know-Nothing Party [n. a name given to the American Party, formed in the 1850s to curtail the political influence of immigrants.] • Primarily middle-class Protestants- they were dismayed by the total # of new immigrants and the # of Catholics among them • Catholic immigrants, according to nativists, during 1830s/1840s were influenced by the Pope and could form a conspiracy to overthrow democracy • While the Democratic Party courted immigrant voters, nativists voted for Know-Nothing candidates. • Did surprisingly well in polls during 1854 but were split over slavery • Northern Know-Nothings began to edge toward the Republican Party
  • 66. Review- Analyzing Causes  • What impact did the • Answer: The slavery slavery issue have on issue had caused a the Democratic and split in the Whig Whig parties? Party; the Democratic Party was scarred
  • 67. Antislavery Parties Form • 2 forerunners of the • 1848- the Free Soil Party- Republican Party n. a political party formed emerged during the in 1848 to oppose the 1840s extension of slavery into U.S. territories. • 1844- tiny abolitionist party- Liberty Party- • Nominated former whose purpose was to president Martin Van create/pass new Buren abolitionist laws • Failed to win any electoral • Received only a small % votes in 1848, received of votes to throw the 10% of the popular vote election to Polk over Clay • Sent a clear message that even some Northerners did not favor abolition, however they definitely opposed the extension of slaves in the
  • 68. The Free-Soilers • Included many N. who were not abolitionists • # of N. Free-Soilers supported the prohibition of black settlement in their communities and denying blacks the right to vote • Free-soilers objected to slavery’s impact on free white workers in the wage-based labor force, upon which the North depended • Abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison considered the Free-Soil Party a “sign of discontent with things political… reaching for something better… it is a party for keeping Free Soil and not for setting men free”
  • 69. Fears of the Free-Soilers • Detected a dangerous pattern in such events as the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act and the repeal of the Missouri Compromise • Convinced that a conspiracy existed on the part of the “diabolical slave power” to spread slavery throughout the U.S.A. • Something or someone, according to the Free-Soilers, had to prevent this spread.
  • 70. Review- Analyzing Motives  • Why did most Free- • Answer: Most Free- Soilers object to Soilers objected to slavery? slavery because they believed that white workers could not get jobs in competition with slaves.
  • 71. Republican Party • In February 1854, @ a school house in Ripon, WI, some discontented N. Whigs held a mtg. w/ antislavery Dems & Free-Soilers to form a new political party • on July 6th – The Republican Party- n. the modern political party that was formed in 1854 by opponents of slavery in the territories. • Formed and organized in Jackson Michigan including one of the founders Horace Greeley • united in opposing the Kansas-Nebraska Actand in keeping slavery out of the territories • Embraced a wide range of opinions • Conservative members wanted to resurrect the Missouri Compromise • Opposite were the radical abolitionists • Drew support from diverse groups and had strength to win a political tug of war with other parties
  • 72. Main Competition • Main competition for Republicans was the Know-Nothing Party • Both targeted the same groups of voters • 1855- Republicans had set up party organizations in about ½ of the N. states but lacked national organization • In Quick succession- fraudulent territorial election in Kasas, sack, massacre, caning leading to issues Republicans needed to challenge the Democrats for the presidency in 1856 • Republicans chose John C. Frémont, famed “pathfinder” who mapped the Oregon Trail and led U.S. troops into CA during Mexican War • Know-Nothings split their allegiance with N. endorsing Frémont and S. selecting Fillmore even though the Whigs were dissolved
  • 73. Enter: Buchanan • Democrats nominated James Buchanan of PA a N. with many S. friends • As minister to GB- he was out of the country during Kansas- Nebraska thus he did not antagonize any side • To balance the N. and the S. Democrats chose John C. Breckinridge as his running mate • Although he received only 45% of the popular vote- he won the S. except MD • Result- Know-Nothings in decline, Republicans gaining power
  • 74. The Life of Buchanan • “life-long bachelor” • Lived with Alabama • According to historian Lisa Senator- William R. Manhart, Buchanan King, VP under Pierce “committed an unspecified • Relationship was so indiscretion that anger his close, Andrew Jackson intended bride, and she called King: “Miss Nancy” broke of their and “Aunt Fancy” engagement” • Others referred to the two • Family forbade James from as “Buchanan and his wife” attending his funeral • Niece- Harriet Lane served as hostess fulfilling the 1st Lady responsibilities
  • 75. Review- Analyzing Effects  • Why was the election • Answer: Because it of 1856 so important established the party to the growth of the as an alternative to Republican Party? the Whigs and the Democrats, and showed that the Republicans would be powerful contenders in the future
  • 76.
  • 77. Summarizer- Synthesizing • How did the way in • The party was united which the Republican in opposing Party was formed slavery, but also indicate that the embraced a wide party stood a good range of opinions. By chance at success? drawing support from conservatives and radicals, it had the strength to overpower other political parties
  • 78. Slavery & Secession Learning Goal: NJCCCS 6.1.12.A.4.a - Analyze the ways in which prevailing attitudes, socioeconomic factors, and government actions (i.e., the Fugitive Slave Act and Dred Scott Decision) in the North and South (i.e., Secession) led to the Civil War. [CRN- 9.11.4 ]
  • 79. Warm Up: Focus & Motivate Event Effect
  • 80. A Cautionary Speech • June 16th, 1858- Rep. Party of Illinois nominated Abraham Lincoln to run for U.S. Senate against Dem. Incumbent Stephen A. Douglas
  • 81. Questions that need answers • Was Lincoln right that the Union would dissolve? • Was President James Buchanan too weak? • Would new legal questions over slavery implode?
  • 82. Slavery Dominates Politics • Slavery was a problem for the indecisive Pres. Buchanan • Administration plagued by slavery-related controversies • 1st one arose on March 6th, 1857- a case that would alter the course of history indefinitely
  • 83. Dred Scott v. Sanford • Facts: • 1857, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin • Dred Scott was an African- American slave • He was taken by his master from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois • He lived on free soil for a long time • When the Army ordered his master to go back to Missouri, he took Scott with him back to that slave state • Issues: • Scott said that he should be free since he lived on free soil for such a long time
  • 84. • Arguments: Scott v. Sanford • As a non-citizen many felt that Scott had no rights and could not sue in a federal court and therefore must remain a slave. • Decision: • Scott lost the decision as the Supreme Court [under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney] declared no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen • The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress could not stop slavery in the newly emerging territories • The decision enraged Abraham Lincoln, and brought the nation to the brink of the Civil War • Result • Effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise • Declared Slaves were property
  • 85. Review- Analyzing Effects  • What was the • Answer: It effectively significance of the repealed the Dred Scott decision? Missouri Compromise; it declared that slaves were property
  • 86. The Lecompton Constitution • Fall of 1857- proslavery government at Lecompton, Kansas wrote a constitution and applied for admission to the Union • Free-Soilers, outnumbered proslavery settlers in Kansas by nearly 10:1- rejected the constitution b/c it protected the rights of slaveholders • Legis. called for a referendum in which people could vote on the proslavery constitution, people voted against it • Pres. Buchanan endorsed the proslavery constitution • Owed his presidency to S. support and believed that since Kansas only had 200 slaves, the Free-Soilers were overreacting • Provoked the wrath of Dem. Stephen A. Douglas and violated popular sovereignty- called for another referendum • Summer- 1858, voters rejected the constitution again • N. hailed Douglas as a hero, S. as a traitor and split the Dem. party
  • 87. Review- Analyzing Motives  • Why did Buchanan • Answer: He was trying to support the appease the Southerners. Lecompton He felt that the small constitution? number of slaves in Kansas made the issue relatively unimportant.
  • 88. Lincoln-Douglas Debates • The race for U.S. Senate in Illinois became a stage for a great political contest • Douglas was a 2-term senator w/ an outstanding record and a large campaign chest • Lincoln was a self-educated man with a dry wit known locally as a successful lawyer and politician. Elected as a Whig to 1-term in Congress in 1846- he broke with his party after the Kansas- Nebraska Act
  • 89. Position & Arguments • Douglas believed in popular sovereignty • Did not think slavery was immoral, he did believe that it was a backward labor system unsuitable to prairie agriculture • Lincoln believed that slavery was immoral • A labor system built on greed • Chief difference: • Douglas believed that popular sovereignty would allow slavery to pass away on its own • Lincoln doubted that slavery would cease to spread without legislation outlawing it in the territories • Lincoln tried to make Douglas look like a defender of slavery and of the Dred Scott decision • Douglas accused Lincoln of being an abolitionist and an advocate for racial equality • Lincoln stated he was not in favor of bringing social and political equality between races but that slavery was a moral, social, and political wrong that should not spread
  • 90. The Freeport Doctrine • 2nd debate held at Freeport • Lincoln asked Douglas if the settlers of a territory could vote to exclude slavery before the territory became a state • Everyone knew that the Dred Scott decision said no • Lincoln implied that Popular Sovereignty was an empty phrase • Douglas’ response became known as the Freeport Doctrine- n. the idea, expressed by Stephen Douglas in 1858, that any territory could exclude slavery by simply refusing to pass laws supporting it. • Douglas also stated no law could be effective without local police regulations meaning use a loophole within Dred Scott • Douglas won the Senate seat, but his response worsened the split between N. and S. wings of the Dem. Party • Lincoln’s attacks on slavery drew national attention leading the Republicans to propose him as a candidate for presidency in 1860
  • 91. Review- Comparing  • Explain the • Answer: Both were similarities and against slavery; differences between however, Lincoln Lincoln’s position on thought the federal slavery and that of government should Douglas. keep slavery out of the territories, while Douglas though the states should decide.
  • 92. Passions Ignite • 1858 was a year of talk- 1859 became a year of action • Most Americans would have welcomed a respite from slavery • “God’s angry man”, John Brown, reemerged on the scene and ended all hopes of a compromise over slavery between the North and the South
  • 93. Harpers Ferry • While politicians debated slavery, John Brown was studying the slave uprisings that had occurred in ancient Rome and on the French island of Haiti • Believed that the time was ripe for similar uprisings • Secretly obtained financial backing from several prominent N. abolitionists • October 16th, 1859- led 21 men, black and white into Harpers Ferry VA • Aim was to seize the federal arsenal and give them to slaves in the area • 60 citizens held hostage with the hope that their slaves would join- none came forward • Local troops killed 8 of Brown’s men • Detachment of U.S. Marines, led by Col. Robert E. Lee stormed the engine house killed 2 more raiders and captured Brown • Brown was tried for treason in VA
  • 94. John Brown’s Hanging • Dec. 2nd, 1859- Brown was hanged for high treason in front of federal troops & observers • Although condemned as a murderer by Lincoln/Douglas- many N. expressed admiration for him & his cause • Bells tolled @ the news of his execution • Guns fire salutes • Huge crowds gathered to denounce the s. • Some called Brown a matyr
  • 95.
  • 96. Review- Analyzing Effects  • Why did Harpers • Answer: Southerners Ferry increase feared that the North tensions between the was inciting slaves to North and the South? revolt, while Northerners viewed Brown as a martyr whose abolitionist cause was worthy of support.
  • 97. The Republican Convention- 1860 • Took place in Chicago which had transformed itself into a convention city w/ more than 50 hotels and an 18,000 sq.-ft. wooden mtg. center named the Wigwam • 4,5000 person delegate floor overflowed within minutes • 1st day consisted of forming committees, listening to prayers, and gossiping about politics • Candidates then bargained for delegates votes
  • 98. Seward and Lincoln • Sen. William H. • Lincoln being an Seward appeared to unknown won him have everything the nomination needed to be a • Lincoln was moderate candidate in his views • Led antislavery forces • Wanted to halt slavery in Congress expansion but would • Financial support of not interfere with the NY south’s slaves • Desire to be center of • South viewed him as attention a “black republican”
  • 99. Nominations of 1860 • 3 major candidates vied for office • Democratic Party split over slavery • N. Dems- Stephen Douglas • S. Dems- VP John C. Breckinridge • Constitutional Union Party- a mix of Know- Nothings and Whigs from the south nominated John Bell of Tennesse
  • 100. Review- Drawing Conclusions  • How did slavery • Answer: The affect U.S. political Democratic party parties in 1860? split over slavery. Those who felt the issue was too central to politics left other parties and formed the Constitutional Union Party.
  • 101.
  • 103. Southern Secession • Lincoln’s victory convinced S. that they had lost their political voice in the national government. • Fearful that Northern Republicans would submit the South to subjection and bondage, S. states decided to act • South Carolina led the way, seceding from the Union on Dec. 20th, 1860 • Mississippi followed on January 9th, 1861; Florida the next day • Weeks later: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas seceded as well. • The Union was dissolved
  • 104.
  • 105. Review- Analyzing Effects  • How did Lincoln’s • Answer: Lincoln’s election affect the election convinced South? the South that Northerners intended to attack slavery everywhere and that it was time to secede.
  • 106. The Shaping of the Confederacy • Feb. 4th, 1861- delegates from the secessionist states met in Alabama and formed the Confederacy- n. the Confederate States of America, a confederation formed in 1861 by the Southern states after their secession from the Union. • Their constitution mirrored the U.S.’s however it protected and recognized slavery in new territories • Feb 9th delegates elected former Sen. of Mississippi Jefferson Davis as president and Alexander Stephens of GA as VP • “The time for compromise has no passed” “Farewell to the Star-Spangled Banner” and “Dixie” became themes
  • 107. The Calm Before the Storm • As the nation awaited Lincoln’s inauguration in March, the citizens were confused • 7 slave states had seceded and formed a new nation • 8 slave states remained within the Union • Would they secede as well? • Pres. Buchanan was uncertain • Announced that secession was illegal, but it would also be illegal for him to do anything about it • He tied his hands • 1 problem- D.C. was very much a Southern city • Secessionists in Congress as well as Fed. Government and president’s cabinet • Mass resignations took place • One question remained- would the North allow the South to leave the Union without a fight?
  • 108. Summarizer- Whip Around • States the reasons for Southern secession.