Communicative Teaching

Reflective Questions:

1)   How do you define “communicative” teaching?
2)   What part of your own classes is “communicative” and what
     part is not?
3)   What kind of difficulties do you often face in making your
     classes more communicative?
1. Elements of Teaching
1) Theory
   - language-based
   - competence-based
   - classroom(practice)-based
2) Participants
   - teachers → skills/methods
   - learners → competence/strategies/motivation
   - classroom → activities/tasks
3) Teaching context/environment
   - ESL/EFL/EIL →
     intelligibility/comprehensibility
2. Communicative Method of Teaching

1) Gear the class to learner needs →
    learner-centered approach
2) Make the class interactive with meaningful,
    purposeful exchanges.
3) Focus on discourse rather than fragmented
    structural knowledge → Fluency is more
    important than accuracy.
4) Try to integrate productive/receptive skills
   (input/output)
5) Use authentic material
3. Important Concepts
1) Top-down vs. bottom-up (cognitive processing)
2) Process-oriented vs. product-oriented
3) Inductive vs. deductive → internalization of
   meta-linguistic knowledge
   (cf. Focus on FormS, Focus on Meaning, Focus on Form)
4) Situated learning → Activation of schema
5) Habit-forming vs. meta-cognitive skills →
   autonomous/independent learner
5) Notional-Functional Syllabus
6) Cooperative/collaborative learning
7) ESP/EAP
4. Components of Linguistic Competence
• Canale & Swain (1980)
   Grammatical, Discoursal, Sociolinguistic, Strategic
• Backman (1990)
   Organizational(grammatical/textual) and
   Pragmatic (illocutional/sociolinguistic)

• pronunciation
• vocabulary/expressions               Micro-level (local) Skills
• language use (grammar)
• discouse-making
• information organizing/structuring      Macro-level(global) Skills
• critical thinking
  (persuasion, negotiation, etc.)
Productive Ability          Capable tasks

     Speaking
       Pronunciation         Telephone response
        Vocabulary           Face-to-face transaction
         Grammar
         Discourse
          Fluency

                               Presentations
General Communication          Discussion at meetings
         Skills                Negotiation
     Logical thinking
  Understanding/Judgment
     Critical thinking        Professional documents
      Expressiveness
        Persuasion           (manuals, contracts,
                              reports, presentation
                              materials, etc.)
                             Complicated business letter
     Writing
        Vocabulary
        Grammar             Daily e-mail
 Structuring/Organization   Routine documents
       Consistency
         Fluency
                            (invoice, export/import
                             documents, etc.)
                            Simple business letter
Language Acquisition Models

1) Krashen Model
Comprehensible Input                   Acquisition


2) Delayed Acquisition
                                          Sufficient
                                                                      Successful
Limited Input            Learning                       Acquisition
                                            Input                      Output

3) Simultaneous Acquisition
Limited but systematic              Learning combined
        input                        With acquisition


*BICS(Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs.
  CALP(Cognitive/Academic Language Proficiency)
Teacher’s Role

                      Stage 1          Stage 2           Stage 3
                    Presentation       Practice         Production
 Role of Teacher       Model          Conductor          Monitor

 Role of Students     Listener        Performer          Interactor

  Activity Type        Lecture     Substitution Drill    Role Play

Class Arrangement    Whole class         Pair           Small Group


                                          *Nunan(1999)より
*Still, inductive → in more deductive, learner-centered activities,
                   teacher will become a “facilitator”.
General Suggestions
• Correct mistakes only when the meaningful
  communication is disrupted/hampered.
• Integration with meaning
• Increase of exposure
• Contextualization (with pragmatic/sociolinguistic
  awareness-raising)
• Activation/internalization of structural knowledge
• Tasks that make learners motivated by tapping on
  their thoughts (critical thinking)
More Classroom-based
            Suggestions
• Integrate micro-level exercises with macro-
  level ones, giving meaningful context.
• Make your exercises/activities interactive, so that
  pragmatic/sociolinguistic awareness is naturally
  required.
• Take advantage of the strengths of both “top-
  down” and “bottom-up” processes.
• If possible, tap students’ critical thinking by
  giving them thought-provoking material.
Activity Example: Interactive Exercise

     Function(speech acts)        Your Response?
1)   apologizing/introducing
2)   offering/requesting
3)   inviting/giving directions
4)   complimenting/criticizing
5)   introducing/accepting
6)   suggesting/inviting

2 4

  • 1.
    Communicative Teaching Reflective Questions: 1) How do you define “communicative” teaching? 2) What part of your own classes is “communicative” and what part is not? 3) What kind of difficulties do you often face in making your classes more communicative?
  • 2.
    1. Elements ofTeaching 1) Theory - language-based - competence-based - classroom(practice)-based 2) Participants - teachers → skills/methods - learners → competence/strategies/motivation - classroom → activities/tasks 3) Teaching context/environment - ESL/EFL/EIL → intelligibility/comprehensibility
  • 3.
    2. Communicative Methodof Teaching 1) Gear the class to learner needs → learner-centered approach 2) Make the class interactive with meaningful, purposeful exchanges. 3) Focus on discourse rather than fragmented structural knowledge → Fluency is more important than accuracy. 4) Try to integrate productive/receptive skills (input/output) 5) Use authentic material
  • 4.
    3. Important Concepts 1)Top-down vs. bottom-up (cognitive processing) 2) Process-oriented vs. product-oriented 3) Inductive vs. deductive → internalization of meta-linguistic knowledge (cf. Focus on FormS, Focus on Meaning, Focus on Form) 4) Situated learning → Activation of schema 5) Habit-forming vs. meta-cognitive skills → autonomous/independent learner 5) Notional-Functional Syllabus 6) Cooperative/collaborative learning 7) ESP/EAP
  • 5.
    4. Components ofLinguistic Competence • Canale & Swain (1980) Grammatical, Discoursal, Sociolinguistic, Strategic • Backman (1990) Organizational(grammatical/textual) and Pragmatic (illocutional/sociolinguistic) • pronunciation • vocabulary/expressions Micro-level (local) Skills • language use (grammar) • discouse-making • information organizing/structuring Macro-level(global) Skills • critical thinking (persuasion, negotiation, etc.)
  • 6.
    Productive Ability Capable tasks Speaking Pronunciation Telephone response Vocabulary Face-to-face transaction Grammar Discourse Fluency Presentations General Communication Discussion at meetings Skills Negotiation Logical thinking Understanding/Judgment Critical thinking Professional documents Expressiveness Persuasion (manuals, contracts, reports, presentation materials, etc.) Complicated business letter Writing Vocabulary Grammar Daily e-mail Structuring/Organization Routine documents Consistency Fluency (invoice, export/import documents, etc.) Simple business letter
  • 7.
    Language Acquisition Models 1)Krashen Model Comprehensible Input Acquisition 2) Delayed Acquisition Sufficient Successful Limited Input Learning Acquisition Input Output 3) Simultaneous Acquisition Limited but systematic Learning combined input With acquisition *BICS(Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. CALP(Cognitive/Academic Language Proficiency)
  • 8.
    Teacher’s Role Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Presentation Practice Production Role of Teacher Model Conductor Monitor Role of Students Listener Performer Interactor Activity Type Lecture Substitution Drill Role Play Class Arrangement Whole class Pair Small Group *Nunan(1999)より *Still, inductive → in more deductive, learner-centered activities, teacher will become a “facilitator”.
  • 9.
    General Suggestions • Correctmistakes only when the meaningful communication is disrupted/hampered. • Integration with meaning • Increase of exposure • Contextualization (with pragmatic/sociolinguistic awareness-raising) • Activation/internalization of structural knowledge • Tasks that make learners motivated by tapping on their thoughts (critical thinking)
  • 10.
    More Classroom-based Suggestions • Integrate micro-level exercises with macro- level ones, giving meaningful context. • Make your exercises/activities interactive, so that pragmatic/sociolinguistic awareness is naturally required. • Take advantage of the strengths of both “top- down” and “bottom-up” processes. • If possible, tap students’ critical thinking by giving them thought-provoking material.
  • 11.
    Activity Example: InteractiveExercise Function(speech acts) Your Response? 1) apologizing/introducing 2) offering/requesting 3) inviting/giving directions 4) complimenting/criticizing 5) introducing/accepting 6) suggesting/inviting