CDH
CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF THE
HIP
Dr. ABDULMONEM ALSIDDIKY , MD , SSCO.
Assistant Professor & Consultant
pediatric Ortho.& Spinal Deformities
KSU,KKUH
Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
Nomenclature
 CDH : Congenital Dislocation of the Hip
 DDH : Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
NORMAL PELVIS
Normal hip Dislocated hip
Patterns of disease
 Dislocated
 Dislocatable
 Sublaxated
 Acetabular dysplasia
Radiology
 After 6 months: reliable
Causes (multi factorial)
 Hormonal
 Relaxin, oxytocin
 Familial
 Lig.laxity diseases
 Genetics
 Female 4 X male --- twins 40%
 Mechanical
 Pre natal
 Post natal
Mechanical causes
 Pre natal
 Breach , oligohydrominus , primigravida , twins
 (torticollis , metatarsus adductus )
 Post natal
 Swaddling , strapping
Infants at risk
 Positive family history: 10X
 A baby girl: 4-6 X
 Breach presentation: 5-10 X
 Torticollis: CDH in 10-20% of cases
 Foot deformities:
 Calcaneo-valgus and metatarsus adductus
 Knee deformities:
 hyperextension and dislocation
Infants at risk
When risk factors are present
 The infant should be reviewed
 Clinically
 radiologically
Clinical examination
 The infant should be
 quiet
 comfortable
 Look:
 External rotation
 Lateralized contour
 Shortening
 Asymmetrical skin folds
 Anterior – posterior
 Move
 Limited abduction
 Special test
 Galiazzi
 Ortolani , Barlow test
 Trendelenburgh sign
 Limping ( waddling gait if bilateral)
Special test
Galiazzi test
Special test
Ortolani test
Special test
Barlow test
Special test
Trendelenburgh sign
Screening programs
 Clinical screening proven to be effective
 Performed by trained personnel
 Must be dynamic
 Repeated with periodic examination
 U/S screening is controversial
Investigations
 0-3 months U/S
 > 3months X-ray pelvis AP + abduction
U/S Screening
 Incidence of hip stability declines rapidly to
50% within the first week of neonatal life.
 Better to delay U/S screening
U/S - Problems
 Too sensitive:
 Detects a lot of hip abnormalities, most of which
would develop normally if left alone
 Operator-dependant
Radiology
 Early infancy: not reliable
Radiology
 After 2-3 months: more reliable
Radiology
 After 2-3 months: more reliable
27o 39o
Radiology
 After 2-3 months: more reliable
in out
in out
Von Rosen view
in out
Radiology
 After 2-3 months: more reliable
in out
Radiology
 After 6 months: reliable
Radiology
 After 6 months: reliable
Treatment - Aims
 Obtain concentric reduction
 Maintain concentric reduction
 In a non-traumatic fashion
 Without disrupting the blood supply to
femoral head
Treatment
 Method depends on age
 The earlier started, the easier it is
 The earlier started, the better the results are
 Should be detected EARLY
Treatment
 Birth – 6m
 Pavlik harness or hip spica
 6-12 m:
 Closed reduction under GA and hip spica
 12 - 18 m:
 Open reduction
 18 – 24 m:
 Open reduction and Acetabuloplasty
 2-8 years:
 Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty, and femoral shortening
 Above 8 years:
 Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty cutting all three pelvic bones, and
femoral shortening
Treatment: Neonatal hip instability
 Most resolve spontaneously
 Can initially wait
 Avoid adduction swaddle
 Apply double diapers – to bring back!!
 See at 2weeks of age
Treatment: Neonatal hip instability
Unstable at 2 weeks:
 Double / Triple diapers: inadequate
 Gives illusion that patient is “in treatment” while
wasting valuable time
Treatment: Neonatal hip instability
Unstable at 2 weeks:
 Pavlik Harness
 Dynamic, effective, safe
Treatment: 6-12 m
 Initially non-operative closed reduction UGA and
immobilization in hip spica cast
 Position:
 Avoid sever abduction
 Avoid frog position
 Must obtain stable concentric reduction,
otherwise needs surgery
Treatment: 6-12 m
 Possibly closed reduction
 Stable and concentric reduction
 Possibly open reduction
 Unstable or un-concentric reduction
 Arthrography-guided
Treatment: 6-12 m
 Arthrography-guided Closed Reduction
Treatment: 6-12 m
Arthrography-guided Closed Reduction
Too lateralized Acceptable
Treatment: 18-24 m
 Open reduction – surgery
 Possibly: Acetabuloplasty
Treatment: Above 2 years
 Open reduction, and
 Acetabuloplasty, and
 Femoral shortening
Acetabuloplasties
 Many types
Treatment
 Birth – 6m
 Pavlik harness or hip spica
 6-12 m:
 Closed reduction under GA and hip spica
 12 - 18 m:
 Open reduction
 18 – 24 m:
 Open reduction and Acetabuloplasty
 2-8 years:
 Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty, and femoral shortening
 Above 8 years:
 Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty cutting all three pelvic bones, and
femoral shortening
CDH - Summary
 Complex multi-factorial, endemic disease
 Health education and Drs. awareness
 Screening programs are needed
 Learning proper examination methods
 Identify at risk groups
 Efficient referral system
 Proper management by specialized Drs
Examples
19-CDH-okk.ppt
19-CDH-okk.ppt
19-CDH-okk.ppt
19-CDH-okk.ppt
19-CDH-okk.ppt

19-CDH-okk.ppt

  • 1.
    CDH CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OFTHE HIP Dr. ABDULMONEM ALSIDDIKY , MD , SSCO. Assistant Professor & Consultant pediatric Ortho.& Spinal Deformities KSU,KKUH Riyadh , Saudi Arabia
  • 2.
    Nomenclature  CDH :Congenital Dislocation of the Hip  DDH : Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Patterns of disease Dislocated  Dislocatable  Sublaxated  Acetabular dysplasia
  • 6.
    Radiology  After 6months: reliable
  • 8.
    Causes (multi factorial) Hormonal  Relaxin, oxytocin  Familial  Lig.laxity diseases  Genetics  Female 4 X male --- twins 40%  Mechanical  Pre natal  Post natal
  • 9.
    Mechanical causes  Prenatal  Breach , oligohydrominus , primigravida , twins  (torticollis , metatarsus adductus )  Post natal  Swaddling , strapping
  • 11.
    Infants at risk Positive family history: 10X  A baby girl: 4-6 X  Breach presentation: 5-10 X  Torticollis: CDH in 10-20% of cases  Foot deformities:  Calcaneo-valgus and metatarsus adductus  Knee deformities:  hyperextension and dislocation
  • 12.
    Infants at risk Whenrisk factors are present  The infant should be reviewed  Clinically  radiologically
  • 13.
    Clinical examination  Theinfant should be  quiet  comfortable
  • 14.
     Look:  Externalrotation  Lateralized contour  Shortening  Asymmetrical skin folds  Anterior – posterior
  • 16.
  • 17.
     Special test Galiazzi  Ortolani , Barlow test  Trendelenburgh sign  Limping ( waddling gait if bilateral)
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Screening programs  Clinicalscreening proven to be effective  Performed by trained personnel  Must be dynamic  Repeated with periodic examination  U/S screening is controversial
  • 23.
    Investigations  0-3 monthsU/S  > 3months X-ray pelvis AP + abduction
  • 24.
    U/S Screening  Incidenceof hip stability declines rapidly to 50% within the first week of neonatal life.  Better to delay U/S screening
  • 25.
    U/S - Problems Too sensitive:  Detects a lot of hip abnormalities, most of which would develop normally if left alone  Operator-dependant
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Radiology  After 2-3months: more reliable
  • 28.
    Radiology  After 2-3months: more reliable 27o 39o
  • 29.
    Radiology  After 2-3months: more reliable in out in out Von Rosen view in out
  • 30.
    Radiology  After 2-3months: more reliable in out
  • 31.
    Radiology  After 6months: reliable
  • 32.
    Radiology  After 6months: reliable
  • 33.
    Treatment - Aims Obtain concentric reduction  Maintain concentric reduction  In a non-traumatic fashion  Without disrupting the blood supply to femoral head
  • 34.
    Treatment  Method dependson age  The earlier started, the easier it is  The earlier started, the better the results are  Should be detected EARLY
  • 35.
    Treatment  Birth –6m  Pavlik harness or hip spica  6-12 m:  Closed reduction under GA and hip spica  12 - 18 m:  Open reduction  18 – 24 m:  Open reduction and Acetabuloplasty  2-8 years:  Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty, and femoral shortening  Above 8 years:  Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty cutting all three pelvic bones, and femoral shortening
  • 36.
    Treatment: Neonatal hipinstability  Most resolve spontaneously  Can initially wait  Avoid adduction swaddle  Apply double diapers – to bring back!!  See at 2weeks of age
  • 37.
    Treatment: Neonatal hipinstability Unstable at 2 weeks:  Double / Triple diapers: inadequate  Gives illusion that patient is “in treatment” while wasting valuable time
  • 38.
    Treatment: Neonatal hipinstability Unstable at 2 weeks:  Pavlik Harness  Dynamic, effective, safe
  • 39.
    Treatment: 6-12 m Initially non-operative closed reduction UGA and immobilization in hip spica cast  Position:  Avoid sever abduction  Avoid frog position  Must obtain stable concentric reduction, otherwise needs surgery
  • 40.
    Treatment: 6-12 m Possibly closed reduction  Stable and concentric reduction  Possibly open reduction  Unstable or un-concentric reduction  Arthrography-guided
  • 41.
    Treatment: 6-12 m Arthrography-guided Closed Reduction
  • 42.
    Treatment: 6-12 m Arthrography-guidedClosed Reduction Too lateralized Acceptable
  • 43.
    Treatment: 18-24 m Open reduction – surgery  Possibly: Acetabuloplasty
  • 44.
    Treatment: Above 2years  Open reduction, and  Acetabuloplasty, and  Femoral shortening
  • 45.
  • 47.
    Treatment  Birth –6m  Pavlik harness or hip spica  6-12 m:  Closed reduction under GA and hip spica  12 - 18 m:  Open reduction  18 – 24 m:  Open reduction and Acetabuloplasty  2-8 years:  Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty, and femoral shortening  Above 8 years:  Open reduction, Acetabuloplasty cutting all three pelvic bones, and femoral shortening
  • 48.
    CDH - Summary Complex multi-factorial, endemic disease  Health education and Drs. awareness  Screening programs are needed  Learning proper examination methods  Identify at risk groups  Efficient referral system  Proper management by specialized Drs
  • 51.