Presented by :
PRASHIK S SHIMPI
M. Pharm 2nd Semester
Department of Quality Assurance
R.C.Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical
Education & Research, Shirpur.
1
Contents
 Introduction
 Optimization parameters
 Classic optimization
 Optimization methods
 Application
 Reference
2
Introduction
 Optimize:
To make as perfect, effective or functional as possible.
 Optimization :
It is the process of finding the best way of using the existing
resources while taking into account all of the factors that
influence decisions in any experiment.
 The composition of pharmaceutical formulation is often subject
to trial & error.
 Optimization by means of an experimental design may be
helpful in shortening the experimenting time.
3
Optimization Parameters
A. Problem type
i) Constrained – Restrictions placed on the system due to
physical limitations or perhaps due to simple practicality.
ii) Unconstrained- No restrictions, but almost nonexistent in
pharmaceuticals.
B. Variable type
i) Independent variable:-
ii) Dependent variable:-
4
Classic Optimization
 Result from application of calculus to the basic problem of
finding the maximum or minimum of a function.
 Useful for problems that are not too complex and do not
involve more than a few variables.
 Y=f (X)
 Y=f(X1, X2)
5
Input Real System Output
Response
Mathematical
Model of
System
Input Factor
Levels
Optimization
Procedure
Applied Optimization Methods
 These general optimization techniques can be described
by following flowchart-
6
Design of experiment
 Factorial designs
 Full Factorial designs
 Fractional Factorial designs
 Plackett-Burman design
 Response surface(second order) designs
• Central Composite designs
• Box-Behnken designs
7
Factorial Design
 A full factorial design for n factors requires runs; with 10
factors that would mean 1024 runs!
 In fractional factorial designs the number of runs N is a power
of 2 (N = 4, 8, 16, 32, and so forth)
 In Plackett-Burman designs the number of runs N is a multiple
of 4 (N = 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and so forth)
 Plackett-Burman designs fill in the gaps in the run sizes
8
Factorial Experiments
3-FACTOR
 3 main effects
(A, B, C)
 3, 2-way Interactions
A X B, A X C, B X C
 1, 3-way Interaction
A X B X C
9
4-FACTOR
 4 main effects
(A, B, C, D)
 6, 2-way Interactions
A X B, A X C, A X D,
B X C, B X D, C X D
 4, 3-way Interactions
A X B X C, A X B X D,
A X C X D, B X C X D
 1, 4-way Interaction
A X B X C X D
- 23 level Factorial Design
- Full / Fractional Factorial Design




































111
111
111
111
111
111
111
111
321 xxx
2 level Full Factorial Design Fractional Factorial Design
Classifications
x1 x1
x2
x2
x3 x3
10
Plackett-Burman Design
 Plackett and Burman (1946) showed how full factorial designs
can be fractionalized in a different manner than traditional 2k
fractional factorial designs, in order to screen the max number
of (main) effects in the least number of experimental runs.
 Fractional factorial designs for studying k = N – 1 variables in
N runs, where N is a multiple of 4.
 Only main effects are of interest.
11
When to use PB designs:
 Screening
 Possible to neglect higher order interactions
 2-level multi-factor experiments.
 More than 4 factors, since for 2 to 4 variables a full factorial
can be performed.
 To economically detect large main effects.
 Particularly useful for N = 12, 20, 24, 28 and 36.
12
Box-Behnken Design
 Box-Behnken designs are the equivalent
of Plackett-Burman designs for the case
of 3-level multi-factor.
13
x1
x2
x3
 When to use Box-Behnken designs:
• With three-level multi-factor experiments.
• When it is required to economically detect large main effects,
especially when it is expensive to perform all the necessary runs.
• When the experimenter should avoid combined factor extremes.
This property prevents a potential loss of data in those cases.
Number of runs required by Central
Composite and Box-Behnken designs
Number
of factors
Box Behnken Central Composite
2 - 13 (5 center points)
3 15 20 (6 center point runs)
4 27 30 (6 center point runs)
5 46 33 (fractional factorial) or
52 (full factorial)
6 54 54 (fractional factorial) or
91 (full factorial)
14
Example: Improving Yield of a
Chemical Process
Factor
Levels
– 0 +
Time (min) 70 75 80
Temperature (°C) 127.5 130 132.5
15
Use a 23 Factorial Design With
Central Points
Run Factors in original
units
Factors in coded
units
Response
Time(min.)
X1
Temp.(°C)
X2 X1 X2
Yield(gms)
Y
1 70 127.5 - - 54.3
2 80 127.5 + - 60.3
3 70 132.5 - + 64.6
4 80 132.5 + + 68.0
5 75 130.0 0 0 60.3
6 75 130.0 0 0 64.3
7 75 130.0 0 0 62.3
Results From First Factorial Design
16
17
Results of Second Factorial Design
Run Factors in original
units
Factors in coded
units
Response
Time(min.)
X1
Temp.(°C)
X2 X1 X2
Yield(gms)
Y
11 80 140 - - 78.8
12 100 140 + - 84.5
13 80 150 - + 91.2
14 100 150 + + 77.4
15 90 145 0 0 89.7
16 90 145 0 0 86.8
18
19
 Improve process yield
 Reduce variability
 Reduce development time
 Reduce overall costs
 Evaluate and compare alternatives
 Evaluate material alternatives
20
Applications of Optimization Techniques
Applications of Optimization Techniques
Optimization techniques are widely used in pharmacy especially
used in-
 Pharmaceutical suspension
 Controlled release formulations
 In tablet coating operation
 In Enteric film coating
 In HPLC analysis
 To study formulation of culture medium in virology
21
Softwares for Optimization Techniques
 Design Expert 7.1.3
 SYSTAT SigmaStat 3.11
 SPSS 13
 DeltaGraph 5.6
 EquivTest
 PASS 2005 Quickstart manual
 Prism GraphPad 4.03
 CYTEL East 3.1
22
Reference
1. Banker GS & Rhodes TS. Modern Pharmaceutics. 2nd ed.
vol-40, p. 803-828.
2. Hirmath SR. Industrial Pharmacy. Orient Longman Private
Ltd. p. 158-168.
3. Lewis GA, Roger DM, Phan-Tan-Luu. Pharmaceutical
Experimental Design. vol-92. p.247- 292.
4. Parikh DM. Handbook Of Pharmaceutical Granulation
Technology. vol-81. p.253-258.
23
5. Alderborn GF & Nystrom CS. Pharmaceutical Powder
Compaction Technology. vol-71. p.580-590.
6. Banker GS & Rhodes CT. Modern Pharmaceutics.4th ed. Vol-
121, p. 606-625.
7. Bolton SA. Pharmaceutical Statistics Practical & Clinical
Application. 3rd ed. vol-80. p. 590-625.
8. Nielloud F & Marti-Mestres G. Pharmaceutical Emulsion
&Suspensions. vol-105, p.51,540,543,549.
24
Thank You
25

Optimization techniques

  • 1.
    Presented by : PRASHIKS SHIMPI M. Pharm 2nd Semester Department of Quality Assurance R.C.Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Shirpur. 1
  • 2.
    Contents  Introduction  Optimizationparameters  Classic optimization  Optimization methods  Application  Reference 2
  • 3.
    Introduction  Optimize: To makeas perfect, effective or functional as possible.  Optimization : It is the process of finding the best way of using the existing resources while taking into account all of the factors that influence decisions in any experiment.  The composition of pharmaceutical formulation is often subject to trial & error.  Optimization by means of an experimental design may be helpful in shortening the experimenting time. 3
  • 4.
    Optimization Parameters A. Problemtype i) Constrained – Restrictions placed on the system due to physical limitations or perhaps due to simple practicality. ii) Unconstrained- No restrictions, but almost nonexistent in pharmaceuticals. B. Variable type i) Independent variable:- ii) Dependent variable:- 4
  • 5.
    Classic Optimization  Resultfrom application of calculus to the basic problem of finding the maximum or minimum of a function.  Useful for problems that are not too complex and do not involve more than a few variables.  Y=f (X)  Y=f(X1, X2) 5
  • 6.
    Input Real SystemOutput Response Mathematical Model of System Input Factor Levels Optimization Procedure Applied Optimization Methods  These general optimization techniques can be described by following flowchart- 6
  • 7.
    Design of experiment Factorial designs  Full Factorial designs  Fractional Factorial designs  Plackett-Burman design  Response surface(second order) designs • Central Composite designs • Box-Behnken designs 7
  • 8.
    Factorial Design  Afull factorial design for n factors requires runs; with 10 factors that would mean 1024 runs!  In fractional factorial designs the number of runs N is a power of 2 (N = 4, 8, 16, 32, and so forth)  In Plackett-Burman designs the number of runs N is a multiple of 4 (N = 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and so forth)  Plackett-Burman designs fill in the gaps in the run sizes 8
  • 9.
    Factorial Experiments 3-FACTOR  3main effects (A, B, C)  3, 2-way Interactions A X B, A X C, B X C  1, 3-way Interaction A X B X C 9 4-FACTOR  4 main effects (A, B, C, D)  6, 2-way Interactions A X B, A X C, A X D, B X C, B X D, C X D  4, 3-way Interactions A X B X C, A X B X D, A X C X D, B X C X D  1, 4-way Interaction A X B X C X D
  • 10.
    - 23 levelFactorial Design - Full / Fractional Factorial Design                                     111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 321 xxx 2 level Full Factorial Design Fractional Factorial Design Classifications x1 x1 x2 x2 x3 x3 10
  • 11.
    Plackett-Burman Design  Plackettand Burman (1946) showed how full factorial designs can be fractionalized in a different manner than traditional 2k fractional factorial designs, in order to screen the max number of (main) effects in the least number of experimental runs.  Fractional factorial designs for studying k = N – 1 variables in N runs, where N is a multiple of 4.  Only main effects are of interest. 11
  • 12.
    When to usePB designs:  Screening  Possible to neglect higher order interactions  2-level multi-factor experiments.  More than 4 factors, since for 2 to 4 variables a full factorial can be performed.  To economically detect large main effects.  Particularly useful for N = 12, 20, 24, 28 and 36. 12
  • 13.
    Box-Behnken Design  Box-Behnkendesigns are the equivalent of Plackett-Burman designs for the case of 3-level multi-factor. 13 x1 x2 x3  When to use Box-Behnken designs: • With three-level multi-factor experiments. • When it is required to economically detect large main effects, especially when it is expensive to perform all the necessary runs. • When the experimenter should avoid combined factor extremes. This property prevents a potential loss of data in those cases.
  • 14.
    Number of runsrequired by Central Composite and Box-Behnken designs Number of factors Box Behnken Central Composite 2 - 13 (5 center points) 3 15 20 (6 center point runs) 4 27 30 (6 center point runs) 5 46 33 (fractional factorial) or 52 (full factorial) 6 54 54 (fractional factorial) or 91 (full factorial) 14
  • 15.
    Example: Improving Yieldof a Chemical Process Factor Levels – 0 + Time (min) 70 75 80 Temperature (°C) 127.5 130 132.5 15
  • 16.
    Use a 23Factorial Design With Central Points Run Factors in original units Factors in coded units Response Time(min.) X1 Temp.(°C) X2 X1 X2 Yield(gms) Y 1 70 127.5 - - 54.3 2 80 127.5 + - 60.3 3 70 132.5 - + 64.6 4 80 132.5 + + 68.0 5 75 130.0 0 0 60.3 6 75 130.0 0 0 64.3 7 75 130.0 0 0 62.3 Results From First Factorial Design 16
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Results of SecondFactorial Design Run Factors in original units Factors in coded units Response Time(min.) X1 Temp.(°C) X2 X1 X2 Yield(gms) Y 11 80 140 - - 78.8 12 100 140 + - 84.5 13 80 150 - + 91.2 14 100 150 + + 77.4 15 90 145 0 0 89.7 16 90 145 0 0 86.8 18
  • 19.
  • 20.
     Improve processyield  Reduce variability  Reduce development time  Reduce overall costs  Evaluate and compare alternatives  Evaluate material alternatives 20 Applications of Optimization Techniques
  • 21.
    Applications of OptimizationTechniques Optimization techniques are widely used in pharmacy especially used in-  Pharmaceutical suspension  Controlled release formulations  In tablet coating operation  In Enteric film coating  In HPLC analysis  To study formulation of culture medium in virology 21
  • 22.
    Softwares for OptimizationTechniques  Design Expert 7.1.3  SYSTAT SigmaStat 3.11  SPSS 13  DeltaGraph 5.6  EquivTest  PASS 2005 Quickstart manual  Prism GraphPad 4.03  CYTEL East 3.1 22
  • 23.
    Reference 1. Banker GS& Rhodes TS. Modern Pharmaceutics. 2nd ed. vol-40, p. 803-828. 2. Hirmath SR. Industrial Pharmacy. Orient Longman Private Ltd. p. 158-168. 3. Lewis GA, Roger DM, Phan-Tan-Luu. Pharmaceutical Experimental Design. vol-92. p.247- 292. 4. Parikh DM. Handbook Of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology. vol-81. p.253-258. 23
  • 24.
    5. Alderborn GF& Nystrom CS. Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology. vol-71. p.580-590. 6. Banker GS & Rhodes CT. Modern Pharmaceutics.4th ed. Vol- 121, p. 606-625. 7. Bolton SA. Pharmaceutical Statistics Practical & Clinical Application. 3rd ed. vol-80. p. 590-625. 8. Nielloud F & Marti-Mestres G. Pharmaceutical Emulsion &Suspensions. vol-105, p.51,540,543,549. 24
  • 25.