6. So the average is 78% overall.
But what is the average if we look at
the results without the lowest-
scoring question or lowest-
performing students?
Clarify
A successful outcome is more than a number (like 82%). It’s also about the content, the assessment, etc.
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/4bf41cefeee011bf1114d422c784ec6a15e4d812/c=163-0-4335-3137&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/2016/08/03/USATODAY/USATODAY/636058407277017878-USP-OLYMPICS-USA-SWIMMING-PRESS-CONFERENCE-83765002.JPG
Give GS at least 10 full minutes to review the assessment and to answer the questions about results.
Ask questions from IH:
At this point, give away NOTHING! Let people make suggestions and offer ideas. Don’t show any right or wrong responses. Some expected comments:
“I can’t tell. I don’t know this content. I teach high school social studies.”
Possible response (for later): As a teacher, you will need to be savvy with all sorts of content that you never taught before. This is 3rd grade math. You can do it!
“They know everything but they don’t understanding how to solve an equation with an unknown in the form of a box symbol.”
Possible response (for later): How do we state that in the language of the standard? The word “box symbol” are not explicit in the language of the standard.
“I can’t tell. The assessment is crap.”
Possible response (for later): What do you mean ‘crap’? Can you pick a question and give us a specific critique of it? (note: these are great questions)
“Next step is to reteach the content on which students struggled.”
Possible response (for later): That’s our generic advice. What specifically needs to be retaught, and in what way?
Say
The average across all items is 78%.
83% if we don’t count the box/unknown problem that everybody goofed.
89% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below.
92% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below AND if we don’t count the one question that 50% of students goofed.
This is the work of analyzing data. It’s about going beyond “on average” to better understand what students really know, and what to do about it.
Say
The average across all items is 78%.
83% if we don’t count the box/unknown problem that everybody goofed.
89% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below.
92% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below AND if we don’t count the one question that 50% of students goofed.
This is the work of analyzing data. It’s about going beyond “on average” to better understand what students really know, and what to do about it.
Say
The average across all items is 78%.
83% if we don’t count the box/unknown problem that everybody goofed.
89% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below.
92% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below AND if we don’t count the one question that 50% of students goofed.
This is the work of analyzing data. It’s about going beyond “on average” to better understand what students really know, and what to do about it.
Say
The average across all items is 78%.
83% if we don’t count the box/unknown problem that everybody goofed.
89% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below.
92% if we don’t count the three students who scored 25% or below AND if we don’t count the one question that 50% of students goofed.
This is the work of analyzing data. It’s about going beyond “on average” to better understand what students really know, and what to do about it.
Ask questions from IH:
At this point, give away NOTHING! Let people make suggestions and offer ideas. Don’t show any right or wrong responses. Some expected comments:
“I can’t tell. I don’t know this content. I teach high school social studies.”
Possible response (for later): As a teacher, you will need to be savvy with all sorts of content that you never taught before. This is 3rd grade math. You can do it!
“They know everything but they don’t understanding how to solve an equation with an unknown in the form of a box symbol.”
Possible response (for later): How do we state that in the language of the standard? The word “box symbol” are not explicit in the language of the standard.
“I can’t tell. The assessment is crap.”
Possible response (for later): What do you mean ‘crap’? Can you pick a question and give us a specific critique of it? (note: these are great questions)
“Next step is to reteach the content on which students struggled.”
Possible response (for later): That’s our generic advice. What specifically needs to be retaught, and in what way?
Review (if time)
Clarify
1) What, if anything, do most students know how to do?
Answer: Most students know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 using strategies and algorithms based on place value and properties of operations
2) What, if anything, are most students still struggling to do?
Answer: Most students don’t know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 based on the relationship between addition and subtraction (they still struggled with the box/unknown question).
3) Who are the low, medium, and high performers? How did you make these designations?
Answer:
4 students scored below 50%. Let’s call them the low performers.
3 students scored between 50% and 80%. Let’s call them the medium performers.
15 students scored 80% or above. Let’s call them the high performers.
These are not the only “right” designations. But they call out clear categorizations of who needs wholesale remediation, who needs some moderate support, and who is demonstrating a high degree of mastery.
If you are going to create these crude categories, that’s a strong guiding principle.
Low-performers: need wholesale remediation of nearly all the content
Medium-performers: need moderate support
High-performers: demonstrating a high degree of mastery
4) What is the next step for this teacher?
Answer:
For the “box problem” check back to exit slips to see if this was ever mastered, or if it was sprung onto the midterm and the symbolism is throwing students off.
For the low performers, provide wholesale reteaching of the content of this standard.
For the medium performers, build the “fluency” needed to always add and subtract correctly and quickly.
Clarify
1) What, if anything, do most students know how to do?
Answer: Most students know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 using strategies and algorithms based on place value and properties of operations
2) What, if anything, are most students still struggling to do?
Answer: Most students don’t know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 based on the relationship between addition and subtraction (they still struggled with the box/unknown question).
3) Who are the low, medium, and high performers? How did you make these designations?
Answer:
4 students scored below 50%. Let’s call them the low performers.
3 students scored between 50% and 80%. Let’s call them the medium performers.
15 students scored 80% or above. Let’s call them the high performers.
These are not the only “right” designations. But they call out clear categorizations of who needs wholesale remediation, who needs some moderate support, and who is demonstrating a high degree of mastery.
If you are going to create these crude categories, that’s a strong guiding principle.
Low-performers: need wholesale remediation of nearly all the content
Medium-performers: need moderate support
High-performers: demonstrating a high degree of mastery
4) What is the next step for this teacher?
Answer:
For the “box problem” check back to exit slips to see if this was ever mastered, or if it was sprung onto the midterm and the symbolism is throwing students off.
For the low performers, provide wholesale reteaching of the content of this standard.
For the medium performers, build the “fluency” needed to always add and subtract correctly and quickly.
Clarify
1) What, if anything, do most students know how to do?
Answer: Most students know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 using strategies and algorithms based on place value and properties of operations
2) What, if anything, are most students still struggling to do?
Answer: Most students don’t know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 based on the relationship between addition and subtraction (they still struggled with the box/unknown question).
3) Who are the low, medium, and high performers? How did you make these designations?
Answer:
4 students scored below 50%. Let’s call them the low performers.
3 students scored between 50% and 80%. Let’s call them the medium performers.
15 students scored 80% or above. Let’s call them the high performers.
These are not the only “right” designations. But they call out clear categorizations of who needs wholesale remediation, who needs some moderate support, and who is demonstrating a high degree of mastery.
If you are going to create these crude categories, that’s a strong guiding principle.
Low-performers: need wholesale remediation of nearly all the content
Medium-performers: need moderate support
High-performers: demonstrating a high degree of mastery
4) What is the next step for this teacher?
Answer:
For the “box problem” check back to exit slips to see if this was ever mastered, or if it was sprung onto the midterm and the symbolism is throwing students off.
For the low performers, provide wholesale reteaching of the content of this standard.
For the medium performers, build the “fluency” needed to always add and subtract correctly and quickly.
Clarify
1) What, if anything, do most students know how to do?
Answer: Most students know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 using strategies and algorithms based on place value and properties of operations
2) What, if anything, are most students still struggling to do?
Answer: Most students don’t know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 based on the relationship between addition and subtraction (they still struggled with the box/unknown question).
3) Who are the low, medium, and high performers? How did you make these designations?
Answer:
4 students scored below 50%. Let’s call them the low performers.
3 students scored between 50% and 80%. Let’s call them the medium performers.
15 students scored 80% or above. Let’s call them the high performers.
These are not the only “right” designations. But they call out clear categorizations of who needs wholesale remediation, who needs some moderate support, and who is demonstrating a high degree of mastery.
If you are going to create these crude categories, that’s a strong guiding principle.
Low-performers: need wholesale remediation of nearly all the content
Medium-performers: need moderate support
High-performers: demonstrating a high degree of mastery
4) What is the next step for this teacher?
Answer:
For the “box problem” check back to exit slips to see if this was ever mastered, or if it was sprung onto the midterm and the symbolism is throwing students off.
For the low performers, provide wholesale reteaching of the content of this standard.
For the medium performers, build the “fluency” needed to always add and subtract correctly and quickly.
Clarify
1) What, if anything, do most students know how to do?
Answer: Most students know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 using strategies and algorithms based on place value and properties of operations
2) What, if anything, are most students still struggling to do?
Answer: Most students don’t know how to fluently add and subtract within 1000 based on the relationship between addition and subtraction (they still struggled with the box/unknown question).
3) Who are the low, medium, and high performers? How did you make these designations?
Answer:
4 students scored below 50%. Let’s call them the low performers.
3 students scored between 50% and 80%. Let’s call them the medium performers.
15 students scored 80% or above. Let’s call them the high performers.
These are not the only “right” designations. But they call out clear categorizations of who needs wholesale remediation, who needs some moderate support, and who is demonstrating a high degree of mastery.
If you are going to create these crude categories, that’s a strong guiding principle.
Low-performers: need wholesale remediation of nearly all the content
Medium-performers: need moderate support
High-performers: demonstrating a high degree of mastery
4) What is the next step for this teacher?
Answer:
For the “box problem” check back to exit slips to see if this was ever mastered, or if it was sprung onto the midterm and the symbolism is throwing students off.
For the low performers, provide wholesale reteaching of the content of this standard.
For the medium performers, build the “fluency” needed to always add and subtract correctly and quickly.
Clarify
A successful outcome is more than a number (like 82%). It’s also about the content, the assessment, etc.
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/4bf41cefeee011bf1114d422c784ec6a15e4d812/c=163-0-4335-3137&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/2016/08/03/USATODAY/USATODAY/636058407277017878-USP-OLYMPICS-USA-SWIMMING-PRESS-CONFERENCE-83765002.JPG