This document presents a project on recognizing static and dynamic identities. It defines static identities as those who emphasize past qualifications and achievements, while dynamic identities focus on responsibility, potential, and willingness to learn. Three people are observed: Mr. X, a professor, has a dynamic identity as he does not emphasize his qualifications but takes responsibility for students and is always learning. Mr. Y, a chief engineer, has a static identity as he blames others and thinks he knows more than subordinates. Mr. Z, an assistant engineer, has a mix as he does his job but lacks interest in learning. The document concludes one should not just focus on qualifications but take responsibility and learn from others.

1. Project Presentation on:
“To recognize “STATIC & DYNAMIC IDENTITIES ” in
the people around me ”
Prepared by
Kavita Pateliya
(Enrl No. 110210111093)

2. DIFFERENCE between Static
and Dynamic identities
Dynamic Identities
•Has capability to make a
positive difference
•Focuses on “Responsibility”
•Believes in future potential
•Willingness to be a learner
Static Identities
•Present his self with his
Qualification
•Make the show of his “Power &
Position”
•Believes in his Past Achievement
•Always takes pride of being
“Knowledge gained”

3. Observation case of 3 persons (X, Y, Z)
•Mr. X is a Professor in a college.
•Mr. Y is a Chief Engineer in a MNC.
•Mr. Z is an Assistant Engineer in an
organization.
In which,
Mr. X has Dynamic identities.
Mr. Y has Static identities.
Mr. Z has Combo of Dynamic & Static identities.

4. Mr. X is a Professor in a
college.
•M.E. in Circuit & Networking, yet never
makes Show of for his Qualification.
•Though being a part of Government
Education System, never runs away from his
Responsibilities towards students.
•Always eager to utilize his knowledge for
new creation.
•Very frank to every students & staff
members, encourages them for their work.
•Eveready to learn from anyone.

5. Mr. Y is a Chief Engineer in a
MNC.
•Got his job after convincing for his Shining Star
Results in college.
•For a failure of some pending work or fault, he
blames his junior employee. Thus runs away from
his Responsibilities.
•He has limited his knowledge for a specific task
given to be completed by organization. Never
thinks to bring some useful change.
•Not much frank to his subordinates & often gets
angry for their fault.
•Thinks that he has every kind of knowledge
more than his juniors.

6. Mr. Z is an Engineer in an
organization.
•Got his job with his result as well as his
knowledge in appropriate field.
•Performs his work on time with interest, but
has no interest in anything else.
•He gained enough knowledge for a job he
has been given.
•Frank to only those subordinates who are
his friends.

7. What did I learn from the case of Dynamic Identities.?
•Don’t run just after qualification, but make an attitude
to work it with another way.
•Take responsibility for what you work.
•Always learn different things from everyone.