The document provides details about a student's project to recognize static and dynamic identities. It defines static identity as one that does not change based on qualifications, awards, power, past achievements or knowledge gained. Dynamic identity undergoes important changes based on understanding, commitment, values, potential contribution, responsibilities, and willingness to learn. It observes three persons - Mr. X with dynamic identity, Mr. Y with static identity, and Mr. Z with a combination. The conclusion is that a contributor's self-image is defined not by past achievements but by potential to make a positive difference, focus on responsibilities, future potential, and being a learner.

1. Student Details :
Name : Chauhan Parth Ashokkumar
Branch : Electronics & Communication
Enrollment No. : 100170111086
Semester : 7th
E-mail : chauhanparth2013@gmail.com
Project : 1(No.4)

2. Project Goal
To recognize “Static identities” and
“Dynamic identities” in people around
me(people I know and meet day in and
day out).

3. Defination :
A static identity is one that does not undergo change and remaining the same at the
end as he or she at beginning.
Static identity is based on
- Qualification and Awards
- power and Position
- Past Achievement
- Knowledge Gained
A Dynamic Identity is one that does undergo an important change. Here, changes in
some Sense within the character like changes in understanding , changes in
commitment , Changes in values.
Dynamic identity is based on
- The difference I can make to the world
- The responsibilities I carry
- my future potential for contribution
- My willingness to learn and grow

4. DIFFERENCE between Static and
Dynamic identities
Static Identities
•Present his self with his
Qualification
•Make the show of his “Power &
Position”
•Believes in his Past Achievement
•Always takes pride of being
“Knowledge gained”
Dynamic Identities
•Has capability to make a
positive difference
•Focuses on “Responsibility”
•Believes in future potential
•Willingness to be a learner

5. Observation case of 3 persons (X, Y, Z)
• Mr. X is a Professor in a college.
• Mr. Y is a Chief Engineer .
• Mr. Z is an Assistant Engineer in an organization.
• In which,
• Mr. X has Dynamic identities.
• Mr. Y has Static identities.
• Mr. Z has Combo of Dynamic & Static identities.

6. • Mr. X is a Professor in a
college.
• M.E. in Circuit & Networking, yet
never makes Show of for his
Qualification.
• Though being a part of Government
Education System, never runs away
from his Responsibilities towards
students.
• Always eager to utilize his
knowledge for new creation.
• Very frank to every students & staff
members, encourages them for their
work.
• Eveready to learn from anyone.

7. • Mr. Y is a Chief Engineer .
• Got his job after convincing for his Shining Star Results in
college.
• For a failure of some pending work or fault, he blames his junior
employee. Thus runs away from his Responsibilities.
• He has limited his knowledge for a specific task given to be
completed by organization. Never thinks to bring some useful
change.
• Not much frank to his subordinates & often gets angry for their
fault.
• Thinks that he has every kind of knowledge more than his
juniors.

8. • Mr. Z is an Engineer in
an organization.
• Got his job with his result as
well as his knowledge in
appropriate field.
• Performs his work on time
with interest, but has no
interest in anything else.
• He gained enough knowledge
for a job he has been given.
• Frank to only those
subordinates who are his
friends.

9. Conclusion
The Contributor’s image of self is not defined by the
qualifications and achievements, not by power and position ,
not by his/her glories rather, he/she thinks of oneself as
someone who has the capability to make a positive difference
in the world , focuses on the responsibility, sees oneself in
terms of his/her future potential – what he/she can accomplish
in the future ,sees oneself as a learner.