Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What’s the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing
Aug. 2, 2014•0 likes•959 views
Download to read offline
Report
Education
Riley, Jenn. "Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What’s the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing." University of North Carolina Scholarly Communications Working Group, December 13, 2011.
Similar to Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What’s the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing
Similar to Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What’s the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing(20)
Digital Libraries, Digital Archives, Digital Humanities, Digital Scholarship: What’s the Difference? Prioritizing, Strategizing, and Executing
1. Digital Libraries, Digital Archives,
Digital Humanities, Digital
Scholarship:
What's the Difference? Prioritizing,
Strategizing, and Executing
Jenn Riley
Head, Carolina Digital Library and
Archives
UNC Library
3. Evolution of the “digital library”
Item-level
digitization/presentation
with non-MARC
metadata
Curated online exhibits
Addition of contextual
materials: essays, lesson
plans, etc
Application of MPLP
ideas from archives and
special collections
Rise of mass digitization
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 3
4. “Digital humanities” evolved in
parallel
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 4
Early
• “Humanities computing”
• Text encoding
• Scholarly editions
Now
• Expansive, inclusive
• Interactive
• Digital collections
• Text mining
• Computational
linguistics
• Scholar-driven
•Spatial & temporal
•Online reference works
•Collaborative
5. Continuum of work
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 5
Digital
collections
Onlineexhibits
Onlinereference
sources
Criticaleditions
Immersive
experiences
Spatial
humanities
Collections
Scholarship
7. Scholarly communication cycle
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 7
Library buys
Scholar
reads/accesses
Scholar does
research
Scholar writes
Scholar
publishes
We’re here
Should we
be here?
8. Some areas of emerging library
involvement
Data management
plans
• Funding
mandates
Open Access
• Faculty-led
campus policies
Library as
publisher
• Dissemination,
not necessarily
peer
review/editing
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 8
9. And then we have born digital
library acquisitions
(For which we take on stewardship
responsibility)
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 9
Personal
papers
Research
data
Administrative
records
Student
records
Government
publications
10. And then…digital methods in
instruction!
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 10
Alternate forms of expressing research
Interactive research
Training digital humanists
11. SO WHAT’S AN ACADEMIC
LIBRARY TO DO?
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 11
12. What’s next for digital collections?
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 12
• Basic description, then possible
enhancement
• Description from users
Build over time
• Quick UI generation
• Reusable, user-friendly collection builder
tools
Streamlined
collection building
• Librarian and scholar built exhibits
• APIs
More methods of
access
• With other institutions
• With web-scale servicesSharing
14. Tiered faculty-facing services
“First of a kind”
collaborative projects
API access to objects
and metadata
Put collections online
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 14
15. How do we ensure sustainability?
We can’t.
• But we can make it more likely
Adhere to community practices
• Metadata
• Object formats
• Software development practices
• Business planning
Build core infrastructure
• Upgrade/build once to benefit many
• Avoid monolithic systems
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 15
16. Modular architectures
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 16
Small pieces,
loosely coupled
• Microservices
• Allows
specialized
development
• Pipelined
together into
larger ones
Flexibility
• Presentation
• Storage
• Easy
replacement
of parts
Data flow
• More
important than
ever
• We need to
get much
better at this
17. UNC’s interpretation of a
preservation repository
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 17
CDR
Faculty
research
Born-digital
acquisitions
Locally
digitized
content
18. SAVE A PLACE FOR
EXPERIMENTATION
(especially in scholarly communication)
(we’re not all comfortable with this yet)
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 18
19. Balance reactive with proactive
12/13/2011 Scholarly Communication Working Group 19
Assessment
Business planning
Project and respond to demand
Take the long view
Distinctive feature of DH – process is as important (or more) than product
“Humanities computing”
Text encoding
Scholarly editions
Text mining
Computational linguistics
Scholar-driven
Expansive, inclusive, interactive
Digital collections
Online reference works
Spatial & temporal visualizations
Collaborative: library connections
And then think about how scholarship is changing
Joyce/NCSU study
Within the library
To scholars themselves
Disciplinary repositories rather than institutional repositories
Cloud, consortial storage
“Centers of excellence”