https://irjet.net/archives/V4/i8/IRJET-V4I814.pdf

1. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 08 | Aug -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 80
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Value and California Bearing Ratio
Relationship
Raj Kumar1, Bibha Mahto2, Mohd.Edriss Aneel3 , Jhalak Kaushik4
1PG Student, Civil Engineering, NIU, GREATER NOIDA, India,
2Assssistant professor, Civil Engineering, NIU, GREATER NOIDA, India,
3,4PG Students, Civil Engineering, NIU, GREATER NOIDA
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - The sub-base/base thickness of asphalt is
represented by the CBR estimation of the sub review soil
together with another parameters appreciate traffic
intensity, barometrical condition, and so forth. The
customary CBR testing technique is costly, time
overpowering and its repeatability is low. . Moreover, it's
appallingly difficult to shape the example at the required
unaltered thickness inside the research center CBR test.
Estimations of in-situ thickness are disparaged because of
nearby sogginess of surface water permeation and stress
discharge while taking out the example. Dynamic cone
infiltration test (DCPT) esteem directed inside the field are
regularly acclimated appraise the CBR esteem gave a
suitable relationship exists amongst CBR and DCPT esteem.
The goal of present work is to decide the relationship
between's CBR (California bearing proportion) and DCPT
(Dynamic cone entrance test) for different soils e.g Clayey,
residue and Sandy Soil. The investigation relates to decide
the effect of wet and compaction on relationship amongst's
CBR and DCPT esteem. The CBR/DCPT investigate had been
performed on the various soil tests at entirely unexpected
wet substance for mud its halfdozen,9,12,15%forresidue at
five,7,9,11,13 % and for sand five, 6,7,8,9,percent This
should prompt compaction of soil at very surprising
densities. with the goal that the present examination can
help with discovering a connection between the DCPT
esteem and the CBR.
KEYWORDS: Soil, DCPT, CBR
1. INTRODUCTION
IRC-37-2012, IndianStandardmanagesthe planofadaptable
asphalt and prescribes the California Bearing Proportion
(CBR) as a marker of subgrade soil quality. The sub-
base/base thickness of asphalt is administered by the CBR
estimation of the subgrade soil alongside some different
parameters, for example, movement power, climatic
conditions and so on. The traditional CBR testing technique
is costly, tedious and its repeatability is low. Furthermore it
is exceptionally hard to shape the specimen at the coveted
in-situ thickness in the research facility CBR test.
Estimations of in-situ thicknessareunder evaluatedbecause
of neighborhood clamminess of surface water permeation
and stress discharge while takingoutthespecimen.Dynamic
cone entrance test (DCPT) esteem directedinthefieldcanbe
utilized to assess the CBR esteem gave a reasonable
relationship exists amongst CBR and DCPT esteem.
The sub-level layer of an asphalt is, basically, the hidden
ground. It is otherwise called the "Arrangement Level",
which can be characterized as the level at which exhuming
stops and development begins: it's the most minimal
purpose of the asphalt structure. For the most part, a sub-
level will require some essential readiness to make it fit for
development purposes, and this procedureisknownas'sub-
review arrangement' or 'diminishing to level'.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Several authors have reported various successful
improvement techniques of correlation between CBR and
DCPT
M. M. E. Zumrawi[1] examined that the DCPT is the most
basic and reasonable test and is wantedtoforeseethein-situ
CBR for the distinctive asphalt layers. A few connections
were created between the DCP with the CBR. The proposed
connection was produced from simple measured soil record
properties. Investigation of the test comes about exhibits
obviously that a direct straight relationship exists between
the underlying state Factor, Fi and the dirt quality measured
by CBR and DCP. The coefficients of thisstraightrelationship
(i.e.constant and slant) were found to rely upon versatility
file and dirt substance of soil. The consequences of this
investigation showed that the dirt introductory state factor
can dependably foresee the quality measured by CBR and
DCP, and along these lines can be utilized to assess the
quality attributes of compacted soils, subgrade, base layers,
and banks for configuration purposes. The consequences of
this examination demonstrated that the proportion CBR to
DCP had great direct association with the dirt starting state
factor, Fi. In view of this relationship, a dependable solid
connection has been set up between the proportion CBR to
DCP and soil introductory state factor.Examinationbetween
the deliberate CBR/DCP esteems and the figured outcomes
utilizing the created condition plainly showed the
dependability of this condition. In this manner, the DCP can
be utilized to appraise the in-situ CBR esteem forthediverse
asphalt layers.
Deepika Chukka et al.[2] examined that the DCPT is the
most basic and reasonable test and is wanted to foresee the
in-situ CBR for the distinctive asphalt layers. A few
connections were created between the DCP with the CBR.

2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 08 | Aug -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 81
The proposed connection was produced from simple
measured soil record properties. Investigation of the test
comes about exhibits obviously that a direct straight
relationship exists between the underlying state Factor, Fi
and the dirt quality measured by CBR and DCP. The
coefficients of this straight relationship (i.e.constant and
slant) were found to rely upon versatility file and dirt
substance of soil. The consequences of this investigation
showed that the dirt introductory state factor can
dependably foresee the quality measured by CBR and DCP,
and along these lines can be utilized to assess the quality
attributes of compacted soils, subgrade, base layers, and
banks for configuration purposes. The consequences of this
examination demonstrated that the proportion CBR to DCP
had great direct association with the dirt starting state
factor, Fi. In view of this relationship, a dependable solid
connection has been set up between the proportion CBR to
DCP and soil introductory state factor.Examinationbetween
the deliberate CBR/DCP esteems and the figured outcomes
utilizing the created condition plainly showed the
dependability of this condition. In this manner, the DCP can
be utilized to appraise the in-situ CBR esteem forthediverse
asphalt layers.
Log (CBR) = 0.441-0.296 log (DCPI).
Adil Mehraj et al.[3] contemplated that further field and
research center trial studies might be empowered on the
theme with the goal that unwavering quality of above
proposed conditions might be enhanced and the proposed
conditions might be promptly used to appraise different
asphalt framework plan parameters likeinplacethickness of
sub-review, undisturbed California Bearing proportion,
drenched California Bearing proportion generally more
accentuation has beenseton assessmentofundisturbedCBR
through DCP relationships on the grounds that inalienably
the lacustrine soils in Kashmir valley are exceptionally
delicate to remolding. Such soils aregenerallymergedandto
a great extent display an established manner. Impact of set
up absorbing such soil is extremely negligible because of
their low penetrability and high level of union. Thusly
aberrant measure of set up and un-doused CBR, utilizing
connection, is a solid measure of sub-review quality,
specifically.
Parampreet Kaur et al. [4] fluctuating from 52% to 66%.
Nature of soil is non plastic. As far as possible is seething
between 18% to 20%. In situ dampness content lies in the
scope of 2.04% to 8.69% and in situ thickness at that areas
are differing from 3.89% to 8.6%. It is watched that DCPT in
view of CBR esteems for splashedconditionisnotasmuchas
the CBR esteems acquired for drenched CBR tests. This is
because of higher repression weight in the unbending mold
utilizing as a part of the test technique of drenched CBR
tests. The doused CBR estimationsofuniformsoilswhichhas
comparative attributes can be resolvedrapidlyandwill have
sufficient precision utilizing DCP test comes about. For
existing conditions, the in situ DCPT can be directed for
assurance of field CBR esteem for in situ thickness. It might
be useful to control quality and accomplishingmoreuniform
auxiliary property in improving parkway development.
3. CONCLUSIONS
In light of different specialists, it is watched thatthere exista
relationship between's CBR Esteem and DCPT esteem The
connection between's CBR esteems have for the most part
been resolved under splashed conditions. In light of above
writing audit it could be presumed that Coefficient of this
direct relationship is rely upon plastic fileanddirtsubstance
of soil. The present examination were restricted to fine
ground soils.IRC 37 – 2012havegivena solitaryrelationship.
Log10CBR= 2.45-1.12 Log10 N
Where N= mm/blow
REFERENCES
1. M. M. E. Zumrawi-“Prediction of In-situ CBR of Subgrade
Cohesive Soils from Dynamic ConePenetrometeandSoil
Properties- IACSIT International Journal of Engineering
and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 5, October 2014
2. K.A.K.Karunaprema andA.G.H.J.Edirisinghe-“ALaboratory
Investigation on the Relationship between Dynamic
Cone Penetrometer Value and Soaked California Bearing
Ratio”-Annual Transactions of IESL -2003 section
(Digesr), pp 120-122, Institution of engineers, Sri Lank
3. P. K. SAHOO & K. SUDHAKAR REDDY- “Evaluation of
subgrade soil using Dynamic cone Penetrometer”-
384International Journal of Earth Sciences and
Engineering ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 02, No. 04, August
2009, pp. 384-388
4. Deepika Chukka, Chakravarthi.V.K-“ Evaluation of
Properties of Soil Subgrade Using Dynamic Cone
Penetration Index”-International Journal of Engineering
Research and Development e-ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN:
2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 4, Issue 4 (October
2012), PP. 07-15 7
5. Adil Mehraj , Firddous Ahmed, Mohammad Zubair, Irshad
Gani Bhat & Ajaz Masood_ “ Experimental Study On In-
situ and Laboratory Co-Relation of Dynamic Cone
Penetrometer Test Result With Sub- Grade CBR for
Lacustrine and Alluvial Plain Soil of Kashmir”-
International Journal ofCivil Structural,Environmentand
Infrastructure (IJCSEIERD) ISSN(P):2249-6866;ISSN(E):
2249-7978 vol. 4,Issue 4, Aug 2014, 45-52 TJPRCpvt.Ltd.
6. Parampreet Kaur, K.S.Gill,B.S.Walia-“CorrelationBetween
Soaked CBR Value andCBRValueObtained WithDynamic
Cone Penetrometer”-IJREAS Volume2, Issue 2 (February
2012) ISSN:2249-3905