SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 26
Diabetic Infection 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
Get Homework/Assignment Done
Homeworkping.com
Homework Help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Research Paper help
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Online Tutoring
https://www.homeworkping.com/
click here for freelancing tutoring sites
Infection- minimal number of viral particles necessary to establish disease
states:
 106  Bone infection
 105
 Soft tissue infection
 102
 Infection of soft tissue or bone + foreign body
 Allows differentiation b/w colonization & infection
-Subjective
 CC: foul smelling ulcer for 3 days etc…
 NLDOCAT
 “Systemic” signs of infection N/C/V/D/F/SOB
 “Local” signs of infection calor, dolar, rubor, tumor, pain
 5 Questions to ask:
1) Trauma?
2) Previous amputations of infections?
3) Recent glucose/HgA1C?
4) NPO status- looking ahead for surgical debridement?
5) Tetanus status?
-PMH co-morbidities associated with disease
-FH parents alive/cause of death
-PSH foot & ankle, CABG, Vascular surg
-Meds dosage & frequency
 Add up all insulin types and divide by 4
-Allergies type of rxn (true rxn or not)
-Social working? how long & how much of drug? Housing?
-ROS
 General, Eyes, Lungs, Pv, Neuro, Musc
 Now the whole thing:
o HEENT, Resp, Cardio, GI/GU, Musc, Skin, Neuro, Lymph
-Objective
 Vitals Temp/HR/RR/BP & Height/weight
o SIRS (need at least 2 of below criteria)
 Temp (96.8 or 100.4)
 HR (>90) & RR (>20)
 WBC (<4k or >12K or 10% bands)
o Septicemia bacteremia + fever, chills, nausea etc…
 Lower Extremity focused
o Vasc: doppler, CFT, edema
 ABI: >1.2= calcification (monkebergs sclerosis)
< 0.45= inadequate for healing in diabetics
 TcPo2: need to be > 30mmHg for adequate healing
o Neuro: protective & vibratory sensation
 Prop & Vib posterior column
 Light touch & pain/temp anterior lateral
o Derm: Depth, Diameter, Drainage, Odor, Base, Border
 PROBE TO BONE??
 Grayson- 89% PPI for OM
 Lavery- 98% NPI for OM
 *Wagner: 0= pre-ulcer, 1= superficial, 2= deep to
bone, 3= deep to bone + abscess/infection
 UT: 0= normal, 1= superficial, 2= tendon, 3= bone
 A= Normal , B= Infected, B= Ischemic, D= both
 PEDIS: (Perfusion Extent Depth Infection Sensation)
 1= uninfected
 2= (Mild) > 2 manifestations of inflam
 Erythema/cellulitis < 2 cm around ulcer
 3= (Mod) Erythema/cellulitis > 2 cm around
ulcer, streaking lymp, abscess, gangrene
 4= (Severe) + N/C/V/D/F/SOB/Confusion
o Musc: boney prominences ?
 Foot type, Previous amputations, Strength
-What to order
1) Imaging:
 X-rays
o Gas= emergency
 Get more PROXIMAL films
 BECKS+ (Bacteroides, E. coli, clostridium, klebsiella,
stap/strep, peptococcus, peptostrepto c
o OM (may take 10-14 days/ need 30-50% resorption)
 Acute= soft tissue swelling, periosteal rxn, lytic
changes, cortical destruction
 Chronic= sequestrum, involucrum, cloca, brodie’s
 MRI
o No contrast if Poor renal function
o T1= low signal
o T2/Stir= high signal in cortex/medullary bone
 Bone Scan
o Increased uptake in all 4 phases
o Charcot vs. “Acute” OM
 Charcot has more diffuse “periarticular” uptake on
phase 3
 Ceretec (Tech-HMPAO) sensitive & specific “safer”
 Only shows ACUTE infections
 Determines if hotspot is in or out of bone
 Indium-111 Oxime done in 24hrs
 Better for CHRONIC infections
2) CBC w/ diff:
 Hemoglobin (12-18) **Transfuse if < 8
 Hematocrit (35-55%) **Transfuse if < 24
o 1 unit PRBC= increase Hg by 1 & Hct by 2
o 1 unit Whole blood= increase Hg 2 & Hct 4
 Platelets (100-450) ** No surgery if < 100
 WBC (<4,000 or >12,000)
 **Absolute Neutrophil Count shift to left with bands & segments
o Left shift= neutrophils + bands > 80
3) BMP
 Sodium (hypernaturemia- dehydration, Na overload, vol overload)
 Glucose- healing potential haulted if >150-175 mg/dL
 Creatinine- kidney function measuring GFR
4) Hba1C (add 30 mg/dl each increase inn HbA1c)
 HbA1c of 5%= 100 mg/dL
 HbA1c of 6%= 130 mg/dL
5) Coag’s
 PT (10-16)
 PTT (25-35)
 INR (1) **Need < 1.6 for surgery
o 1 unit FFP decreases INR by 0.2
6) Inflammatory markers
 ESR (0-20 mm/hr) NOT SPECFIC
o Kaleta- if > 70 suspect OM
 CRP (0-0.8 mg/L) more closely follows the severity of ds
7) Albumin (3.5-5 g/L)
 Pre-albumin (19-36 mg/dL) **shorter half life
8) EKG/CXR/HCG
 EKG Males > 40 & Females >50 going to surgery
 CXR smoking history
 HCG women < 50 yrs
9) Culture (always get AFTER debridement)
 Gram stains
o G(+): stains purple (Teichoic acids, lacks outer-membrane)
 Cocci: Staph (cat + “cluster”) & Strep (cat – “chains”)
 S. aureus (coagulase +)
 Rods: clostridrum, bacillus, etc..
o G(-): stains pink (Endotoxin in outer-membrane)
 Cocci: Neisseria (oxidase + diplococci)
 Rods: Pseudomonas (oxidase + lactose non-ferm)
 Aerobic, Anaerobic, Fungal, Acid-fast
 Culture & Sensitivity
 Blood culture (3 diff locations 10 min apart)
10) Non-invasive studies
 Doppler: want biphasic
 Segmental pressures: > 10 mmHg drop indicates occlusion
 ABI: need > 0.45 (Wagner)
 TcPo2: need > 30 mmhg (Wyss, Harrington & Burgess, JBJS)
o Will be decreased from edematous states
-Decision making
 Admit or home
o Make “Outpatient” if:
 Local infection that can be controlled w/ PO Abx
 Benign medical conditions
o Make “Inpatient” if:
 Systemic infection requiring IV Abx
 Needed surgical intervention
 Immunocompromised (Dm, PVD, HIV, RA, Elderly,
Steriod)
 Admit (ADCVANDLIMAX)
 Antibiotics/Meds
o Creatinine clearance (140-age) x weight (kg) (x 0.85 in women) / 72 x serum Cr
o Vanc (1g q12 IV) & Zoysn (4.5 g q6 IV)
 Adjust vanc according to trough levels
o PCN Allergy (Clinda 600 mg q6 IV) & (Cipro 400 mg q12 IV)
o PCN & Quin allergy Clinda & Aztreonam (1 g q8 IV)
o Sliding scale of insulin
 Once glucose is 200mg/dL then give 2 units, and 2
more units each 50 increase of glucose
 Surgery (make NPO)
o Beside I&D (localized, neuropathic, etc..)
 Irrigation w/ local debridement
 Wet to dry dressing (dakins, betadine, saline)
 Cultures & tissue biopsy
o OR I&D (tracks or probes, abscess, gas in tissue)
 Debridement, Drainage, Decompression
 Remove all tendons in the way
 Pulse lavage at least 3 liters (DAB vs. TAB)
 Deep cultures & Tissue biopsy
 Clean margins with bone resection procedure
 Antibiotic beads (PMMA)
 Commonly used antibiotics include: gentamycin,
tobramycin, and vancomycin
 Packed open and eventual DPC
 Chronic OM
 Sequesterum is non-viable and a nidus for
infections so it must be removed
o TMA
 Incisions:
 Fishmouth w/ adequate plantar flap
 Tennis racquet for lesser met amp
 Preserve only P. brevis & PT
 Adjunct TAL
DVT 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
-Introduction
DVT clot formed in deep venous system of LE
 PE “detached” thrombus from LE that travels to arteries of lung
 Risk Factors (I AM CLOTTED)
o Inactivity, A fib/Age, MI, Coag state, Longevity of surgery,
Obesity, Tobacco use, Trauma, Estrogen, DVT history
 Common locations
o 20% of calf emboli will become thigh emboli
o 1/5th of PE come from calf
-Clinical Diagnosing:
 Clinically: red, hot, swollen, painful calf - edema is the most reliable
sign of DVT (compare suspected calf to the contralateral side)
 Homan’s test DF foot elicits pain in calf
 Pratt’s sign calf compression elicits pain
-Diagnostic Tests:
 Non-invasive
o Duplex Doppler: lack of venous compression indicates DVT
 Can have color flow imaging to enhance sensitivity
 Allows to determine direction of blood flow and the
amount of reduction in lumen diameter
 Grady-Bensmetal JBJS, 1994: duplex ultrasound has
the PPV of 7/9
o Impedence plethysmography
 measures small changes in electrical resistance of the
chest, calf or other regions of the body.
 These measurements reflect blood volume changes, and
can indirectly indicate the presence or absence of
venous thrombosis
o MRI provide visual images of your veins and may show if
you have a clot
o D-dimer detect fragments produced by clot lysis
 high sensitivity may be useful for excluding the
diagnosis of acute DVT, particularly when the pre-test
probability for the disease is low
 Invasive
o Contrast venography
 Gold standard for detecting DVT
 Disadvantages contrast agent can cause reactions
such as urticaria, angioedema, bronchospasm, cv
collapse or injury to kidney
 Creatinine > 2.0 mg/d is relative contraindication
-Diagnosing PE
 PE COD: Right-sided heart failure
o Increased right ventricular wall causes underfilling of left
ventricle provoking myocardial ischemia compromising
coronary artery perfusion leading to circulatory collapse.
 Clinically: sudden onset of chest pain, dyspnea, hemoptysis,
tachycardia Pt may be febrile, hypotensive and cyantic
o Triad CP, Dyspnea, Hemoptysis
 Diagnosis:
o 1) Blood gasses: PaO2 < 80 mmHg
o 2) Chest x-ray: 50% are normal; a normal or near normal
chest x-ray in a dyspenic patient suggests PTE.
 Abnormalities include: focal oligemia (Westermark’s
sign), a peripheral wedge shaped density above
diaphragm (Hamptom’s hump) or enlarged right
descending pulm artery
o 3) Ventilation- Perfusion Scan (V/Q Scan)
 **A mismatch demonstrating an area of ventilation but
NO perfusion suggests PE
 Ventilation: inhalation of xenon 133
 Perfusion: T99 labeled albumin
 V/Q mismatch: acute PE, previous PE, centrally located
cancer, radiation
o 4) Pulmonary angiography
 Definitive test, indicated if V/Q scan is inconclusive
 Diagnostic signs: intraluminal filling defect, abrupt
vessel cutoff, loss of side branches
-Prophylactic Measures:
 Non-pharmacologic
o Compression stockings
o SCDs prevents stasis due to increased venous return
 Pharmacologic
o Heparin
 Pre-op 5,000 units SQ q2h
 Post-op 5,000 units SQ q8-qh
-Treatment
 Heparin IV
o MOA Binds & accelerates Anti-thrombin 3 which potentiates
the inhibition of coag factors 10a and 2a““works in blood”
o Loading dose: 10,000 -15,000u or 80u/kg
o Maintenance dose: start with 1,000 u/hr (18u/kg/hr)
o MONITOR PTT DAILY (goal 60-90 seconds)
 Titrate to 1.5-2 x normal (30ish x 2= 60)
o Reversal Protamine sulfate
 1 mg protamine pre 100 u heparin
o LMWH (Lovenox)
 More predictable efficacy and lower incidence of adverse
effects such as HIT, patients can inject LMWH
themselves at home
 Therapeutic 30 mg SQ BID (for 7-10 days)
 Prophylactic 1 mg/kg SQ (for 7-10 days)
 Coumadin
o MOA interfere with the synthesis of Vit. K clotting factors
2, 7, 9, 10, and Protein S & C “works in the liver”
o Start after heparin is therapeutic
o Commonly 2.5 mg qd
o MONITOR PT DAILY (1-1.15 x normal/INR 2 -3)
 Titrate to 1-1.15 x normal (1.2 ish x 2= 17)
o Reversal Vit. K or FFP
 Thrombolytic (Urokinase, Streptokinase, tPA)
o MOA aid in conversion of plasminogen to “Plasmin” which
cleaves thrombin & fibrin clots (+) PT & PTT
o Must be initiated w/in 24-48 hrs
o Loading dose 250,000 Units infused over 30 min
o Dosage/Duration 100,000 Units/hr for 72 hr
 Surgical
o Greenfield filter placed in IVC below renal veins
o Embolectomy
Hallux Limitus & Rigidus 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
-Introduction
 Normal 70 DF & 30 PF
 Limitus decrease in ROM “limited dorsiflexion” < 20 degrees
 Rigidus Absent ROM due to “ankylosis” <10 degrees
o Presence of bony ankylosis & sesamoid immobilization
 Classification
o Functional Dorsi decreased ONLY when loaded (Stage 1)
o Structural Dorsi decreased BOTH loaded & unloaded
o Primary long 1st metatarsal
o Secondary DJD, trauma, arthritis
 Etiology
o Long/short 1st, MPE, Trauma, Hypermobility, Arthritis
 Clinical findings:
o Dorsal bunion w/ tenderness on dorsiflexion
o Apropulsive gait w/ early off & abductory twist
 Radio findings:
o Joint space narrow w/ loose bodies
o Squared/flattened met head
o Subchondral scerlosis
o Met primus elevatus
-Classification Systems (Drago, Oloff, Regnauld)
 Regnauld
o Stage 1
 Joint enlargement w/ mild spurring
 Functional Hallux Limit
o Stage 2
 Narrowing of joint space
 Flattening met head with dorsal exostosis
o Stage 3
 Severe loss of joint space w/ crepitus on ROM
 Joint mice w/ extensive spurring & DJD
o Stage 4
 Complete bony ankylosis “obliteration of joint”
-Conservative treatment (Stages 1 & 2)
 Activity modification & PT
 Orthotics (rocker bottom, morton’s extension, 1st ray cut out)
 NSAIDs (PO) or Corticosteriod (injection
-Surgical treatment (Stages 3 & 4)
 Joint Preservation (> 50% of cartilage) “CCBWY”
1) Cheilectomy resection of dorsal exostosis
2) Cotton opening wedge osteotomy
3) Bonney & Kessel dorsal wedge of phalanx base
4) Waterman dorsal wedge of met base
5) Youngswick plantarflexory osteotomy
 Joint Destruction (< 50& of cartilage) “K FILM”
1) Keller resection 1/3 proximal phalanx base
2) Implant (total vs. hemi) function as spacer
3) Fusion “Mckeever” 15 dorsiflexed & 10 abducted
4) Mayo/Stone Mayo (artic surface) & Stone (1/4th met head)
5) Lapidus TMT joint fusion
-Post-Op Management
 Orthotic + padding
 PT with passive ROM exercises
 Serial radiographs
Bunion case 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
-Introduction:
 Goals (RED CAR):
o Reduction of abnormal osseous angles
o Establish congruous 1st MPJ
o Decrease medial eminence
o Control correction of factors that lead to deformity
o Align sesamoids back to proper position
o Restoration of 1st MPJ weight bearing function
 Etiology
o Primary hypermobile/long 1st or pronation
o Secondary trauma, RA, pes planus, gout
 Pathology
o Progressive disorder with these factors affecting:
 Hyperpronation unlock MTJ loss P. longus 1st ray
instable retrograde buckle adductor advantage
ligament instability arthritic changes
o Stages:
 1- lateral displacement of prox phalanx
 2- HAV where 1st abuts 2nd digit
 3- increase IM angle
 4- subluxed hallux w/ overriding digits
 Anatomy
o 4 articular surfaces
o 9 ligaments (2 collateral, 4 sesamoidal, Intersesamoidal,
DTIML, Capsule)
o FHL only tendon that DOESN’T attach to MPJ capsule
o Square met head is most stable
-Radiography
 In the area of patient’s presenting complaint I see:
o AP view
1) (Mild or Severe) soft tissue swelling
2) (Mild or Severe) HAV deformity at level of MPJ defined by
(mild or mod) increases in:
 IM angle (8-12°)
 HAI angle (< 10°)
 HA angle (15°)
3) PASA & DASA (normal, deviated, subluxed)
 Positional (P +D < HA) “subluxed/deviated joint”
 Structural (P + D = HA) “congruous joint”
4) Tibial sesamoid position (1-7)
5) Length of 1st met (normal, long, short) using:
 Met parabola- (142°)
 Met protrusion index (0-2 mm)
6) Metatarsus adductus/Engel (< 15°)
 Abnormal MA may mask IM deformity
o Lateral View
1) 1st met is (elevated, normal, short) compared to 2nd met
using Seiberg’s index
 distal distance – proximal distance (+ = Elevatus)
o 2) Foot type (pes planus, cavus, normal)
-Capsule Tendon Balancing Procedures
 Silver (1923) resection of DM eminence w/ lateral capsulotomy
and medial capsulorraphy
 Mcbride “True” (1928) silver + fibular sesamoid removal and
transfer of adductor tendon
 Hiss (1931) transfer adductor from plantar to medial
 Joplin’s sling (1950) transfer adductor thru met
 Component procedures:
o Adductor transfer
o EHL lengthening
o EHB tenotomy
o Capsulorraphy (Washington, H, T, Inverted L, Linear)
-Osetotomies
 Hallux interphalangeus “Distal” Akin
 Abnormal DASA “Proximal” Akin (5-10 mm from MPJ)
 Abnormal PASA Reverdin 
o 1st cut: = to articular surface
o 2nd cut:  to long axis
o Green plantar cut to protect sesamoids w/ hinge intact
o Laird lateral cortical hinge not maintained (IM correction)
 True IM < 16° Distal osteotomy
o Austin/Kalish/Youngswick stable sag & frontal planes
o Mitchell shortens “lateral hinge intact”
o Hoffman shortens “trapezoid osteotomy”
o Wilson shortens “oblique osteotomy”
o Scarf Central cut DD PP w/ 70° angles
o Keller resection of prox phalanx base “elderly”
o Mckeever fusion “for arthritic joint”
 True IM > 16° Proximal osteotomy “hinge axis concept”
o Ludloff cut PD DP
o Mau cut PP DD “better stability”
o Juvara oblique CBW 40° cut “avoid growth plate”
 A) wedge B) wedge + hinge cut C) no wedge
o CBW/OBW shortens or lengthens 1st met
o Cresecentic bad stability
o Lapidus hypermobile first or large met/IM
o Logroscino Reverdin + CBW
-Surgical technique
 Single screw halfway b/w line  to long axis & line  to
osteotomy
 K-wire dorsal distal medial to plantar proximal lateral
-Post-op
 NWB 4-6 weeks
 Serial radiographs
-Complications
 Hallux varus (staking, aggressive bandage, fibular sesamoid
removed, overcorrection on IM)
o Systemic Repair of Hallux Varus (McGlamry)
 Complete ST release, Correction of structural deformity
(IM angle), Tendon transfers, Tibial sesamoidectomy,
Joint arthroplasty
 Capital fragment on floor (Christenson; 1992)
o Mix 1 L NS (+) 1 mL Neosporin irrigant (+) 1:100K Bacitracin
o Transfer to 3 different basins w/ solution x5
o Document and tell patient
 Others: infection, avn, non-union, fixation failure, shortening,
reoccurrence, sesamoiditis
Haglunds & Retrocal Exostosis 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
-Introduction
 Haglunds posterior-superior painful bursal projection of
calcaneus due to enlargement of this cal region
o Involves retrocalc & achilles bursa
o Caused by: shoe gear irritation or cavus foot
 Retrocal Exostosis ensethopathy at achilles tendon
o Intratendinous calcification of soft tissues
o Traverses “Entire” posterior aspect of heel
o Caused by: trauma or overuse causing thickening
 DDX:
o Calc bursisitis, Achilles tendonitis, Achilles rupture, Tumor
-Radiology
 Fowler & Phillip (normal 45-70)
o Line posterior calc w/ line tangent to PS prominence
o Pathologic > 75
 Total angle (normal < 90)
o Calcaneal inclination (+) Fowler & Phillip
o Pathologic > 90
 Parallel pitch lines
o Line 1 tangent to ant. tuber & medial plantar tuber
 Then draw line  to this
o Line 2 parallel to “Line 1” and  to perpendicular line
o Pathologic bursal projection above “Line 2”
-Conservative treatment
 Shoe (heel lift, padding, orthotic)
 NSAIDS
-Surgical treatment (avoid chasing the “bump”)
 Keck & Kelly remove wedge from posterior-superior calc
o For structural cavus foot type
 Duvries lateral incision
 F & P Mercedes incision thru achilles, then resect bump
 Speed bridge resect bump then reapproximate w/ speed bridge
Pes Planus (Flexible vs. Rigid) 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
-Etiology
 Flexible
o Equinus
o Congenital (talipes calcaneovalgus)
o Structural (compensated FF varus or valgus)
o Ligamentous (PTTD or ligamentous laxity)
 Rigid
o Tarsal coalition (Syn-desmosis, chondrosis, ostosis)
 *TC (12-16), CN (12-8), TN (3-5)
 True collation= intra-articular fusion of 2 bones
o Congenital (Apert’s or Nievergelt-pearlman)
 Both seen with cuneiform coalitions
o Trauma (fractures)
o Peroneal spasm
-Planes of dominance:
 STJ axis 42 transverse & 16 sagittal
 MTJ “oblique” 52 transverse & 57 sagittal
o DF, PF, abduction, adduction
 MTJ “longitudinal” 15 transverse & 9 sagittal
o Inversion & eversion
-Clinical exam
 Hubscher maneuver dorsiflex hallux creates windlass mech.
o Arch elevation, PF 1st ray, RF supination, Ext leg rotation
 ROM (Ankle, STJ, MTJ)
o Ankle 10 dorsiflexion & 20 plantarflexion
o STJ 10 eversion & 20 inversion
o MTJ “longitundal” 4-6
 Have patient stand in angle & base
o Too many toes sign
o RSCP in > 4 valgus
o Single heel rise test
 Coalition findings
o Progressive valgus w/ bow strung peroneal tendons “SPASM”
-Classifications
 Johnson & Strom
o 1) tenosynovitis + mild tendon degeneration “flexible”
 Tendon debridement + orthotics
o 2) elongated & degenerated + TTS “flexible”
 Tendon transfer & RF procedure
o 3) elongated & ruptured + inability in SHR test “rigid
 Triple or Double arthrodesis
o 4) rigid ankle valgus
 Triple or TCC arthrodesis
 Deland 2A) <30% TN uncover 2B) >30% TN uncover
 Funk 1) avulsion 2) ms rupture 3) in-continuity tear 4) tenosyno
 Conti (MRI)
o 1A) couple long splits 1B) multiple long splits & fibrosis
o 2) narrowing of tendon w/ DEGENERATION
o 3A) disuse swelling & degen 3B) complete rupture
-Radiology
 AP view (transverse plane)
o TN articulation (75%) DECREASED
o TC “Kites” (20) INCREASED
o Cuboid Abduction (0-5) INCREASED
 Lateral view (sagittal plane)
o CI (20) DECREASED
o TD (20) INCREASED
o LTC (40) INCREASED
o Navic-Cub superimposed INCREASED
o Cyma line ANTERIOR BREAK
o Meary’s (0-15) NEGATIVE “decreased”
 Calc axial (frontal plane)
o RF eversion “rule out ankle valgus”
o Decreased height of sustentaculum
 Harris-Beath evaluates middle & posterior facets
o Views= 35, 40, 45 axial views
 Medial Oblique
o Anteater sign “CN coalition”
 Lateral Oblique
o Anterior facet coalition
 CT Scan
o Modality of choice for coalition
o Asses subtle cortical changes in surrounding
-Flexible Procedures:
 Goals:
o Primary joint stability
o Secondary recreate arch height
o Most procedures will include TAL procedure
 Soft tissue
1) PT repair remove degenerated section
2) FDL TT suture w/in PT sheath to help reestablish arch
3) PB-PL anastomsis removes deforming force
 Transverse correction
1) Evans opening wedge 1.5 cm proximal to CC joint
2) CCJ distract arthrodesis lengthens lateral column
3) Kidner advancement & reattachment of PT
 Sagittal correction
1) Cotton plantarflexes 1st ray (bone graft)
2) Arthrodesis:
o Lowman TN fusion (+) TAL
o Hoke NC fusion
o Miller NC fusion (+) 1st Met-Cuneiform
o Lapidus 1st Met-Cuneifrom fusion
3) Young TS reroute TA thru navicular
 Frontal correction
1) Calc Osteotomies:
o Dwyer closing wedge osteotomy
o Kouts slide fragment medial (increases supination)
2) Arthroeresis (MTJ must have locking ability on RF)
o MBA “self-locking” blocks anterior migration of talus
 RF valgus or FF varus must be reducible in order to do
 Leading edge should approach but NOT cross bisection
of talus on AP view
 Should allow 2-4 of STJ eversion
o STA-Peg (non-ang) “axis-altering” elevates STJ
o Sgarlato “direct-impact” impingement force laterally
3) Historical
o Chambers- bone graft in “sinus tarsi”
o Selakovic- bone graft under “sustentaculum”
o Baker & Hill- bone graft under “posterior STJ facet”
Pes Cavus 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM
-Etiology
 Stable “Static” vs. Progressive
o Stable conditions treatable w/ ST procedure
 Rigid vs. Flexible
o Rigid conditions requires osteotomies & arthrodesis
 Bilateral:
o *CMT, CP, SC tumor, Spina bifida, Polio, infection
o Charcot Marie Tooth (autosomal dominant)
 Bilateral slowing of sensory & motor nerve conduction
 HSMN I classic CMT usually in 2nd decade
(hypertrophic)
 HSMN II manifests later in life (axonal)
 Unilateral:
o Crush syndrome, SC injury, Deep post compart syndrome
-Clinical exam
 Charcot Marie Tooth
o Claw toes- over recruitment of long extensors
o Cavus- PL overpowers TA causing PF 1st ray
o Foot drop- “stork legs” due to muscle wasting
 Coleman Block Test (sagittal plane deformity evaluation)
o Forefoot (1st ray) is suspended off a block
o FF driven calcaneus returns from varus back to normal
o RF driven calcaneus stays in varus after removing forefoot
elements
o Anterior cavus (apex found at intersection of Meary’s angle)
 Caused by: forefoot “PLANTARFLEXED” On rearfoot
 Local (1st ray) vs. Global (entire FF)
 Flexible (DF at Midfoot) vs. Rigid (pseudoequinus)
 Metatarsus apex at lisfranc
 Forefoot apex at choparts
o Posterior cavus (increased CI angle > 30 & varus position)
 Caused by: rearfoot “DORSIFLEXED” on forefoot
 Flexible (no change in CI on WB) vs. Rigid (Decreased
CI on WB)
 Secondary to anterior cavus
 Neurological evaluation
o Asses motor, sensory systems, reflexes and coordination
tests.
 Biomechanical evaluation
o ROM (AJ, STJ, MTJ)
o Wide based gait = neurologic
o Extensor substitution HT (exentsors > lumbricales)
o Pseduoequinus- ankle must dorsiflex cuz forefoot cant
 EMG & Nerve conduction testing
-Classifications
 Ruch/Surgical
-Stage 1 (flexible may appear normal on WB)
o Deformity restricted to Metatarsal, MPJ or Digits
o Tx: digital fusion, extensor tenotomy, flexor transfers
-Stage 2 (more rigid deformity)
o Deformity consists of rigid PF 1st ray & RF varus
o Tx: DFWO, Dwyer, STATT, Peroneal stop
-Stage 3 (marked rigid deformity)
o Severe global RF & FF deformity on neuromuscular cause
o Tx: MTJ osteotomies, Triple arthrodesis, tendon transfer
 Japas
o Anterior cavus (apex found at intersection of Meary’s angle)
 Caused by: forefoot PLANTARFLEXED On rearfoot
 Local (1st ray) vs. Global (entire FF)
 Flexible (DF at Midfoot) vs. Rigid (pseudoequinus)
1) Metatarsus apex at lisfranc
2) Lesser tarsus entire lesser tarsal region
3) Forefoot apex at choparts
4) Combined 2 or more of the above
o Posterior cavus (increased CI angle > 30 & varus position)
 Caused by: rearfoot DORSIFLEXED on forefoot
 Flexible (no change in CI on WB) vs. Rigid (Decreased
CI on WB)
 Secondary to anterior cavus
-Radiology
 AP view (transverse plane)
o TN articulation (75%) INCREASED
o TC “Kites” (20) DECREASED
o Cuboid Abduction (0-5) DECREASED
 Lateral view (sagittal plane)
o CI (20) INCREASED
o TD (20) DECREASED
o LTC (40) DECREASED
o Cyma line POSTERIOR BREAK
o Meary’s (0-15) POSITIVE “increase”
-Operative treatment
 Goals must identify apex of deformity/rigid vs. flexible
 Soft Tissue Release
o Steindler stripping removes all plantar fascia at insertion
 PF, Abd hallucis, Abd dmq, FDB, Quad plantae
o Plantar medial release release all muscle/ligaments medial
o Historical
 Borst & Larsen- release mc joints & plantar intrinsics
 Garceau & Brahms- resect motor branches
 Tendon Transfers (flexible deformities)
o Jones EHL thru 1st met head “dorsiflexes hallux”
o Heyman EHL & EDL thru each respected met head
o Hibbs EDL transferred to 3rd cuneiform
o Girdlestone FDL transferred to dorsal prox phalanx
o STATT lateral half transferred to p. tertius insertion
o TPTT difficult out of phase transfer
o Peroneal anastomosis transfer PL to PB “Stop procedure”
 Osseous procedures (rigid & neuromuscular)
o Cole dfwo at NC “coparts joint”
o Japas displacement V osteotomy thru all midfoot joints
o Jahss Cole at lisfranc joint
o DFMO dorsiflexes forefoot
o Dwyer lateral closing wedge “take out of varus”
 Arthrodesis
o Triple (Ryerson- 1920)
 Resect (TN CC TC) ** fix in opposite order
 Position:
 Dorsiflexion- 0
 RF valgus- 5
 Abduction- 5
 Ext rotation- 15
 Incisions
 Lateral (fib malleolous to 4th met base)
 Exposes TC & CC
 Reflect EDB, protect peroneal, incise plug
 Inverted L capsular incision
 Dissect until visualization of STJ facets
 Dorso-Medial (distal med malleolus to NCJ)
 Exposes TN
 Incision carried longitundal to PT & TA
 Fixation
 TC aimed posterior-lateral from talar neck (6.5
partial cancellous)
 TN screw < 40mm (4.5 cortical) or staple
 CC screw < 40mm (4.5 cortical) or staple
 Post-op
 Admit for pain control
 NWB 8 weeks
 Progressive PT after 10-12 weeks

More Related Content

What's hot (11)

Case study Tuberculosis infectious disease
Case study Tuberculosis infectious disease Case study Tuberculosis infectious disease
Case study Tuberculosis infectious disease
 
Diagnostic approach to the patient with aki
Diagnostic approach to the patient with akiDiagnostic approach to the patient with aki
Diagnostic approach to the patient with aki
 
Caso completo
Caso completoCaso completo
Caso completo
 
Whipple病
Whipple病Whipple病
Whipple病
 
Rvt
RvtRvt
Rvt
 
E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎
E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎
E 2 溶連菌感染後 糸球体腎炎
 
Empiric antibiotic management for major infections
Empiric antibiotic management for major infectionsEmpiric antibiotic management for major infections
Empiric antibiotic management for major infections
 
Dengue algorithm
Dengue algorithmDengue algorithm
Dengue algorithm
 
The last conference
The last conferenceThe last conference
The last conference
 
Medical diagnosis case 1
Medical diagnosis case 1Medical diagnosis case 1
Medical diagnosis case 1
 
Shock 2011
Shock 2011Shock 2011
Shock 2011
 

Similar to 240637960 case-workups

Similar to 240637960 case-workups (20)

Venous Thrombosis Emboli disease and how to manage it
Venous Thrombosis Emboli disease and how to manage itVenous Thrombosis Emboli disease and how to manage it
Venous Thrombosis Emboli disease and how to manage it
 
DVT
DVTDVT
DVT
 
Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, by Prof. Minnu M. Panditrao
Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, by Prof. Minnu M. PanditraoDeep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, by Prof. Minnu M. Panditrao
Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, by Prof. Minnu M. Panditrao
 
Acute pulmonary thromboembolism
Acute pulmonary thromboembolismAcute pulmonary thromboembolism
Acute pulmonary thromboembolism
 
VTE,DVT&PE
VTE,DVT&PEVTE,DVT&PE
VTE,DVT&PE
 
TCT TORPEDO
TCT TORPEDOTCT TORPEDO
TCT TORPEDO
 
Pulmonary embolism
Pulmonary embolismPulmonary embolism
Pulmonary embolism
 
Pulmonary embolism
Pulmonary embolismPulmonary embolism
Pulmonary embolism
 
Dengue Cu Resident 01 2010
Dengue Cu Resident 01 2010Dengue Cu Resident 01 2010
Dengue Cu Resident 01 2010
 
Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary EmbolismPulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism
 
Venous Thromboembolism
Venous ThromboembolismVenous Thromboembolism
Venous Thromboembolism
 
Dvt
DvtDvt
Dvt
 
Pulmonary embolism
Pulmonary embolismPulmonary embolism
Pulmonary embolism
 
Cardiac petct ahmed tawakol
Cardiac petct ahmed tawakolCardiac petct ahmed tawakol
Cardiac petct ahmed tawakol
 
DVT PROPHYLAXIS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES
DVT PROPHYLAXIS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIESDVT PROPHYLAXIS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES
DVT PROPHYLAXIS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES
 
A case of Compressive Myelopathy
A case of Compressive MyelopathyA case of Compressive Myelopathy
A case of Compressive Myelopathy
 
Pancreatitis
PancreatitisPancreatitis
Pancreatitis
 
Acute gi b leed (revised) (p) copy
Acute gi b leed (revised) (p)   copyAcute gi b leed (revised) (p)   copy
Acute gi b leed (revised) (p) copy
 
upper G I Bleed (non variceal)
upper G I Bleed (non variceal)upper G I Bleed (non variceal)
upper G I Bleed (non variceal)
 
Tetty Yuniati - Cyanotic CCHD.pptx
Tetty Yuniati - Cyanotic CCHD.pptxTetty Yuniati - Cyanotic CCHD.pptx
Tetty Yuniati - Cyanotic CCHD.pptx
 

More from homeworkping4

242269855 dell-case-study
242269855 dell-case-study242269855 dell-case-study
242269855 dell-case-studyhomeworkping4
 
242266287 case-study-on-guil
242266287 case-study-on-guil242266287 case-study-on-guil
242266287 case-study-on-guilhomeworkping4
 
242259868 legal-research-cases
242259868 legal-research-cases242259868 legal-research-cases
242259868 legal-research-caseshomeworkping4
 
241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva
241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva
241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtivahomeworkping4
 
241985748 plm-case-study
241985748 plm-case-study241985748 plm-case-study
241985748 plm-case-studyhomeworkping4
 
241946212 case-study-for-ocd
241946212 case-study-for-ocd241946212 case-study-for-ocd
241946212 case-study-for-ocdhomeworkping4
 
241941333 case-digest-statcon
241941333 case-digest-statcon241941333 case-digest-statcon
241941333 case-digest-statconhomeworkping4
 
241909563 impact-of-emergency
241909563 impact-of-emergency241909563 impact-of-emergency
241909563 impact-of-emergencyhomeworkping4
 
241905839 mpcvv-report
241905839 mpcvv-report241905839 mpcvv-report
241905839 mpcvv-reporthomeworkping4
 
241767629 ethics-cases
241767629 ethics-cases241767629 ethics-cases
241767629 ethics-caseshomeworkping4
 
241716493 separation-of-powers-cases
241716493 separation-of-powers-cases241716493 separation-of-powers-cases
241716493 separation-of-powers-caseshomeworkping4
 
241603963 drug-study-final
241603963 drug-study-final241603963 drug-study-final
241603963 drug-study-finalhomeworkping4
 
241573114 persons-cases
241573114 persons-cases241573114 persons-cases
241573114 persons-caseshomeworkping4
 
241566373 workshop-on-case-study
241566373 workshop-on-case-study241566373 workshop-on-case-study
241566373 workshop-on-case-studyhomeworkping4
 
241524597 succession-full-cases
241524597 succession-full-cases241524597 succession-full-cases
241524597 succession-full-caseshomeworkping4
 
241299249 pale-cases-batch-2
241299249 pale-cases-batch-2241299249 pale-cases-batch-2
241299249 pale-cases-batch-2homeworkping4
 
241262134 rubab-thesis
241262134 rubab-thesis241262134 rubab-thesis
241262134 rubab-thesishomeworkping4
 
241259161 citizenship-case-digests
241259161 citizenship-case-digests241259161 citizenship-case-digests
241259161 citizenship-case-digestshomeworkping4
 

More from homeworkping4 (20)

242269855 dell-case-study
242269855 dell-case-study242269855 dell-case-study
242269855 dell-case-study
 
242266287 case-study-on-guil
242266287 case-study-on-guil242266287 case-study-on-guil
242266287 case-study-on-guil
 
242259868 legal-research-cases
242259868 legal-research-cases242259868 legal-research-cases
242259868 legal-research-cases
 
241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva
241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva
241999259 case-hemstoma-sukonjungtiva
 
241985748 plm-case-study
241985748 plm-case-study241985748 plm-case-study
241985748 plm-case-study
 
241946212 case-study-for-ocd
241946212 case-study-for-ocd241946212 case-study-for-ocd
241946212 case-study-for-ocd
 
241941333 case-digest-statcon
241941333 case-digest-statcon241941333 case-digest-statcon
241941333 case-digest-statcon
 
241909563 impact-of-emergency
241909563 impact-of-emergency241909563 impact-of-emergency
241909563 impact-of-emergency
 
241905839 mpcvv-report
241905839 mpcvv-report241905839 mpcvv-report
241905839 mpcvv-report
 
241767629 ethics-cases
241767629 ethics-cases241767629 ethics-cases
241767629 ethics-cases
 
241716493 separation-of-powers-cases
241716493 separation-of-powers-cases241716493 separation-of-powers-cases
241716493 separation-of-powers-cases
 
241603963 drug-study-final
241603963 drug-study-final241603963 drug-study-final
241603963 drug-study-final
 
241585426 cases-vii
241585426 cases-vii241585426 cases-vii
241585426 cases-vii
 
241573114 persons-cases
241573114 persons-cases241573114 persons-cases
241573114 persons-cases
 
241566373 workshop-on-case-study
241566373 workshop-on-case-study241566373 workshop-on-case-study
241566373 workshop-on-case-study
 
241524597 succession-full-cases
241524597 succession-full-cases241524597 succession-full-cases
241524597 succession-full-cases
 
241356684 citibank
241356684 citibank241356684 citibank
241356684 citibank
 
241299249 pale-cases-batch-2
241299249 pale-cases-batch-2241299249 pale-cases-batch-2
241299249 pale-cases-batch-2
 
241262134 rubab-thesis
241262134 rubab-thesis241262134 rubab-thesis
241262134 rubab-thesis
 
241259161 citizenship-case-digests
241259161 citizenship-case-digests241259161 citizenship-case-digests
241259161 citizenship-case-digests
 

Recently uploaded

AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptNishitharanjan Rout
 
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxPSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxMarlene Maheu
 
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...EduSkills OECD
 
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjStl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjMohammed Sikander
 
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinhĐề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinhleson0603
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of TransportBasic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of TransportDenish Jangid
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptxGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptxneillewis46
 
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFThe Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFVivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
Major project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategies
Major project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategiesMajor project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategies
Major project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategiesAmanpreetKaur157993
 
Analyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptx
Analyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptxAnalyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptx
Analyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptxLimon Prince
 
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life PowerpointBook Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint23600690
 
How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17
How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17
How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17Celine George
 
male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................MirzaAbrarBaig5
 
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptxHow to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptxCeline George
 
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfFICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfPondicherry University
 
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
ANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptxANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptx
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptxPoojaSen20
 
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxObserving-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxAdelaideRefugio
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSAnaAcapella
 

Recently uploaded (20)

AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
 
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxPSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
 
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
Andreas Schleicher presents at the launch of What does child empowerment mean...
 
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjStl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
 
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinhĐề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
 
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
TỔNG HỢP HƠN 100 ĐỀ THI THỬ TỐT NGHIỆP THPT TOÁN 2024 - TỪ CÁC TRƯỜNG, TRƯỜNG...
 
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of TransportBasic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptxGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
 
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFThe Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
 
Major project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategies
Major project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategiesMajor project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategies
Major project report on Tata Motors and its marketing strategies
 
Analyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptx
Analyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptxAnalyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptx
Analyzing and resolving a communication crisis in Dhaka textiles LTD.pptx
 
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life PowerpointBook Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
 
How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17
How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17
How to Send Pro Forma Invoice to Your Customers in Odoo 17
 
male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................
 
Mattingly "AI and Prompt Design: LLMs with NER"
Mattingly "AI and Prompt Design: LLMs with NER"Mattingly "AI and Prompt Design: LLMs with NER"
Mattingly "AI and Prompt Design: LLMs with NER"
 
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptxHow to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
How to Manage Website in Odoo 17 Studio App.pptx
 
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdfFICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
FICTIONAL SALESMAN/SALESMAN SNSW 2024.pdf
 
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
ANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptxANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptx
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
 
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptxObserving-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
Observing-Correct-Grammar-in-Making-Definitions.pptx
 
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPSSpellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
Spellings Wk 4 and Wk 5 for Grade 4 at CAPS
 

240637960 case-workups

  • 1. Diabetic Infection 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM Get Homework/Assignment Done Homeworkping.com Homework Help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Research Paper help https://www.homeworkping.com/ Online Tutoring https://www.homeworkping.com/ click here for freelancing tutoring sites Infection- minimal number of viral particles necessary to establish disease states:  106  Bone infection  105  Soft tissue infection  102  Infection of soft tissue or bone + foreign body  Allows differentiation b/w colonization & infection -Subjective  CC: foul smelling ulcer for 3 days etc…  NLDOCAT  “Systemic” signs of infection N/C/V/D/F/SOB  “Local” signs of infection calor, dolar, rubor, tumor, pain  5 Questions to ask: 1) Trauma?
  • 2. 2) Previous amputations of infections? 3) Recent glucose/HgA1C? 4) NPO status- looking ahead for surgical debridement? 5) Tetanus status? -PMH co-morbidities associated with disease -FH parents alive/cause of death -PSH foot & ankle, CABG, Vascular surg -Meds dosage & frequency  Add up all insulin types and divide by 4 -Allergies type of rxn (true rxn or not) -Social working? how long & how much of drug? Housing? -ROS  General, Eyes, Lungs, Pv, Neuro, Musc  Now the whole thing: o HEENT, Resp, Cardio, GI/GU, Musc, Skin, Neuro, Lymph -Objective  Vitals Temp/HR/RR/BP & Height/weight o SIRS (need at least 2 of below criteria)  Temp (96.8 or 100.4)  HR (>90) & RR (>20)  WBC (<4k or >12K or 10% bands) o Septicemia bacteremia + fever, chills, nausea etc…  Lower Extremity focused o Vasc: doppler, CFT, edema  ABI: >1.2= calcification (monkebergs sclerosis) < 0.45= inadequate for healing in diabetics  TcPo2: need to be > 30mmHg for adequate healing o Neuro: protective & vibratory sensation  Prop & Vib posterior column  Light touch & pain/temp anterior lateral o Derm: Depth, Diameter, Drainage, Odor, Base, Border  PROBE TO BONE??
  • 3.  Grayson- 89% PPI for OM  Lavery- 98% NPI for OM  *Wagner: 0= pre-ulcer, 1= superficial, 2= deep to bone, 3= deep to bone + abscess/infection  UT: 0= normal, 1= superficial, 2= tendon, 3= bone  A= Normal , B= Infected, B= Ischemic, D= both  PEDIS: (Perfusion Extent Depth Infection Sensation)  1= uninfected  2= (Mild) > 2 manifestations of inflam  Erythema/cellulitis < 2 cm around ulcer  3= (Mod) Erythema/cellulitis > 2 cm around ulcer, streaking lymp, abscess, gangrene  4= (Severe) + N/C/V/D/F/SOB/Confusion o Musc: boney prominences ?  Foot type, Previous amputations, Strength -What to order 1) Imaging:  X-rays o Gas= emergency  Get more PROXIMAL films  BECKS+ (Bacteroides, E. coli, clostridium, klebsiella, stap/strep, peptococcus, peptostrepto c o OM (may take 10-14 days/ need 30-50% resorption)  Acute= soft tissue swelling, periosteal rxn, lytic changes, cortical destruction  Chronic= sequestrum, involucrum, cloca, brodie’s  MRI o No contrast if Poor renal function o T1= low signal o T2/Stir= high signal in cortex/medullary bone  Bone Scan o Increased uptake in all 4 phases o Charcot vs. “Acute” OM  Charcot has more diffuse “periarticular” uptake on phase 3
  • 4.  Ceretec (Tech-HMPAO) sensitive & specific “safer”  Only shows ACUTE infections  Determines if hotspot is in or out of bone  Indium-111 Oxime done in 24hrs  Better for CHRONIC infections 2) CBC w/ diff:  Hemoglobin (12-18) **Transfuse if < 8  Hematocrit (35-55%) **Transfuse if < 24 o 1 unit PRBC= increase Hg by 1 & Hct by 2 o 1 unit Whole blood= increase Hg 2 & Hct 4  Platelets (100-450) ** No surgery if < 100  WBC (<4,000 or >12,000)  **Absolute Neutrophil Count shift to left with bands & segments o Left shift= neutrophils + bands > 80 3) BMP  Sodium (hypernaturemia- dehydration, Na overload, vol overload)  Glucose- healing potential haulted if >150-175 mg/dL  Creatinine- kidney function measuring GFR 4) Hba1C (add 30 mg/dl each increase inn HbA1c)  HbA1c of 5%= 100 mg/dL  HbA1c of 6%= 130 mg/dL 5) Coag’s  PT (10-16)  PTT (25-35)  INR (1) **Need < 1.6 for surgery o 1 unit FFP decreases INR by 0.2 6) Inflammatory markers  ESR (0-20 mm/hr) NOT SPECFIC o Kaleta- if > 70 suspect OM  CRP (0-0.8 mg/L) more closely follows the severity of ds 7) Albumin (3.5-5 g/L)  Pre-albumin (19-36 mg/dL) **shorter half life 8) EKG/CXR/HCG  EKG Males > 40 & Females >50 going to surgery  CXR smoking history  HCG women < 50 yrs
  • 5. 9) Culture (always get AFTER debridement)  Gram stains o G(+): stains purple (Teichoic acids, lacks outer-membrane)  Cocci: Staph (cat + “cluster”) & Strep (cat – “chains”)  S. aureus (coagulase +)  Rods: clostridrum, bacillus, etc.. o G(-): stains pink (Endotoxin in outer-membrane)  Cocci: Neisseria (oxidase + diplococci)  Rods: Pseudomonas (oxidase + lactose non-ferm)  Aerobic, Anaerobic, Fungal, Acid-fast  Culture & Sensitivity  Blood culture (3 diff locations 10 min apart) 10) Non-invasive studies  Doppler: want biphasic  Segmental pressures: > 10 mmHg drop indicates occlusion  ABI: need > 0.45 (Wagner)  TcPo2: need > 30 mmhg (Wyss, Harrington & Burgess, JBJS) o Will be decreased from edematous states -Decision making  Admit or home o Make “Outpatient” if:  Local infection that can be controlled w/ PO Abx  Benign medical conditions o Make “Inpatient” if:  Systemic infection requiring IV Abx  Needed surgical intervention  Immunocompromised (Dm, PVD, HIV, RA, Elderly, Steriod)  Admit (ADCVANDLIMAX)  Antibiotics/Meds o Creatinine clearance (140-age) x weight (kg) (x 0.85 in women) / 72 x serum Cr o Vanc (1g q12 IV) & Zoysn (4.5 g q6 IV)  Adjust vanc according to trough levels o PCN Allergy (Clinda 600 mg q6 IV) & (Cipro 400 mg q12 IV) o PCN & Quin allergy Clinda & Aztreonam (1 g q8 IV)
  • 6. o Sliding scale of insulin  Once glucose is 200mg/dL then give 2 units, and 2 more units each 50 increase of glucose  Surgery (make NPO) o Beside I&D (localized, neuropathic, etc..)  Irrigation w/ local debridement  Wet to dry dressing (dakins, betadine, saline)  Cultures & tissue biopsy o OR I&D (tracks or probes, abscess, gas in tissue)  Debridement, Drainage, Decompression  Remove all tendons in the way  Pulse lavage at least 3 liters (DAB vs. TAB)  Deep cultures & Tissue biopsy  Clean margins with bone resection procedure  Antibiotic beads (PMMA)  Commonly used antibiotics include: gentamycin, tobramycin, and vancomycin  Packed open and eventual DPC  Chronic OM  Sequesterum is non-viable and a nidus for infections so it must be removed o TMA  Incisions:  Fishmouth w/ adequate plantar flap  Tennis racquet for lesser met amp  Preserve only P. brevis & PT  Adjunct TAL
  • 7. DVT 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM -Introduction DVT clot formed in deep venous system of LE  PE “detached” thrombus from LE that travels to arteries of lung  Risk Factors (I AM CLOTTED) o Inactivity, A fib/Age, MI, Coag state, Longevity of surgery, Obesity, Tobacco use, Trauma, Estrogen, DVT history  Common locations o 20% of calf emboli will become thigh emboli o 1/5th of PE come from calf -Clinical Diagnosing:  Clinically: red, hot, swollen, painful calf - edema is the most reliable sign of DVT (compare suspected calf to the contralateral side)  Homan’s test DF foot elicits pain in calf  Pratt’s sign calf compression elicits pain -Diagnostic Tests:  Non-invasive o Duplex Doppler: lack of venous compression indicates DVT  Can have color flow imaging to enhance sensitivity  Allows to determine direction of blood flow and the amount of reduction in lumen diameter  Grady-Bensmetal JBJS, 1994: duplex ultrasound has the PPV of 7/9 o Impedence plethysmography  measures small changes in electrical resistance of the chest, calf or other regions of the body.  These measurements reflect blood volume changes, and can indirectly indicate the presence or absence of venous thrombosis o MRI provide visual images of your veins and may show if you have a clot
  • 8. o D-dimer detect fragments produced by clot lysis  high sensitivity may be useful for excluding the diagnosis of acute DVT, particularly when the pre-test probability for the disease is low  Invasive o Contrast venography  Gold standard for detecting DVT  Disadvantages contrast agent can cause reactions such as urticaria, angioedema, bronchospasm, cv collapse or injury to kidney  Creatinine > 2.0 mg/d is relative contraindication -Diagnosing PE  PE COD: Right-sided heart failure o Increased right ventricular wall causes underfilling of left ventricle provoking myocardial ischemia compromising coronary artery perfusion leading to circulatory collapse.  Clinically: sudden onset of chest pain, dyspnea, hemoptysis, tachycardia Pt may be febrile, hypotensive and cyantic o Triad CP, Dyspnea, Hemoptysis  Diagnosis: o 1) Blood gasses: PaO2 < 80 mmHg o 2) Chest x-ray: 50% are normal; a normal or near normal chest x-ray in a dyspenic patient suggests PTE.  Abnormalities include: focal oligemia (Westermark’s sign), a peripheral wedge shaped density above diaphragm (Hamptom’s hump) or enlarged right descending pulm artery o 3) Ventilation- Perfusion Scan (V/Q Scan)  **A mismatch demonstrating an area of ventilation but NO perfusion suggests PE  Ventilation: inhalation of xenon 133  Perfusion: T99 labeled albumin  V/Q mismatch: acute PE, previous PE, centrally located cancer, radiation
  • 9. o 4) Pulmonary angiography  Definitive test, indicated if V/Q scan is inconclusive  Diagnostic signs: intraluminal filling defect, abrupt vessel cutoff, loss of side branches -Prophylactic Measures:  Non-pharmacologic o Compression stockings o SCDs prevents stasis due to increased venous return  Pharmacologic o Heparin  Pre-op 5,000 units SQ q2h  Post-op 5,000 units SQ q8-qh -Treatment  Heparin IV o MOA Binds & accelerates Anti-thrombin 3 which potentiates the inhibition of coag factors 10a and 2a““works in blood” o Loading dose: 10,000 -15,000u or 80u/kg o Maintenance dose: start with 1,000 u/hr (18u/kg/hr) o MONITOR PTT DAILY (goal 60-90 seconds)  Titrate to 1.5-2 x normal (30ish x 2= 60) o Reversal Protamine sulfate  1 mg protamine pre 100 u heparin o LMWH (Lovenox)  More predictable efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects such as HIT, patients can inject LMWH themselves at home  Therapeutic 30 mg SQ BID (for 7-10 days)  Prophylactic 1 mg/kg SQ (for 7-10 days)  Coumadin o MOA interfere with the synthesis of Vit. K clotting factors 2, 7, 9, 10, and Protein S & C “works in the liver” o Start after heparin is therapeutic o Commonly 2.5 mg qd o MONITOR PT DAILY (1-1.15 x normal/INR 2 -3)
  • 10.  Titrate to 1-1.15 x normal (1.2 ish x 2= 17) o Reversal Vit. K or FFP  Thrombolytic (Urokinase, Streptokinase, tPA) o MOA aid in conversion of plasminogen to “Plasmin” which cleaves thrombin & fibrin clots (+) PT & PTT o Must be initiated w/in 24-48 hrs o Loading dose 250,000 Units infused over 30 min o Dosage/Duration 100,000 Units/hr for 72 hr  Surgical o Greenfield filter placed in IVC below renal veins o Embolectomy
  • 11. Hallux Limitus & Rigidus 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM -Introduction  Normal 70 DF & 30 PF  Limitus decrease in ROM “limited dorsiflexion” < 20 degrees  Rigidus Absent ROM due to “ankylosis” <10 degrees o Presence of bony ankylosis & sesamoid immobilization  Classification o Functional Dorsi decreased ONLY when loaded (Stage 1) o Structural Dorsi decreased BOTH loaded & unloaded o Primary long 1st metatarsal o Secondary DJD, trauma, arthritis  Etiology o Long/short 1st, MPE, Trauma, Hypermobility, Arthritis  Clinical findings: o Dorsal bunion w/ tenderness on dorsiflexion o Apropulsive gait w/ early off & abductory twist  Radio findings: o Joint space narrow w/ loose bodies o Squared/flattened met head o Subchondral scerlosis o Met primus elevatus -Classification Systems (Drago, Oloff, Regnauld)  Regnauld o Stage 1  Joint enlargement w/ mild spurring  Functional Hallux Limit o Stage 2  Narrowing of joint space  Flattening met head with dorsal exostosis o Stage 3  Severe loss of joint space w/ crepitus on ROM  Joint mice w/ extensive spurring & DJD o Stage 4  Complete bony ankylosis “obliteration of joint”
  • 12. -Conservative treatment (Stages 1 & 2)  Activity modification & PT  Orthotics (rocker bottom, morton’s extension, 1st ray cut out)  NSAIDs (PO) or Corticosteriod (injection -Surgical treatment (Stages 3 & 4)  Joint Preservation (> 50% of cartilage) “CCBWY” 1) Cheilectomy resection of dorsal exostosis 2) Cotton opening wedge osteotomy 3) Bonney & Kessel dorsal wedge of phalanx base 4) Waterman dorsal wedge of met base 5) Youngswick plantarflexory osteotomy  Joint Destruction (< 50& of cartilage) “K FILM” 1) Keller resection 1/3 proximal phalanx base 2) Implant (total vs. hemi) function as spacer 3) Fusion “Mckeever” 15 dorsiflexed & 10 abducted 4) Mayo/Stone Mayo (artic surface) & Stone (1/4th met head) 5) Lapidus TMT joint fusion -Post-Op Management  Orthotic + padding  PT with passive ROM exercises  Serial radiographs
  • 13. Bunion case 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM -Introduction:  Goals (RED CAR): o Reduction of abnormal osseous angles o Establish congruous 1st MPJ o Decrease medial eminence o Control correction of factors that lead to deformity o Align sesamoids back to proper position o Restoration of 1st MPJ weight bearing function  Etiology o Primary hypermobile/long 1st or pronation o Secondary trauma, RA, pes planus, gout  Pathology o Progressive disorder with these factors affecting:  Hyperpronation unlock MTJ loss P. longus 1st ray instable retrograde buckle adductor advantage ligament instability arthritic changes o Stages:  1- lateral displacement of prox phalanx  2- HAV where 1st abuts 2nd digit  3- increase IM angle  4- subluxed hallux w/ overriding digits  Anatomy o 4 articular surfaces o 9 ligaments (2 collateral, 4 sesamoidal, Intersesamoidal, DTIML, Capsule) o FHL only tendon that DOESN’T attach to MPJ capsule o Square met head is most stable -Radiography  In the area of patient’s presenting complaint I see: o AP view 1) (Mild or Severe) soft tissue swelling 2) (Mild or Severe) HAV deformity at level of MPJ defined by (mild or mod) increases in:
  • 14.  IM angle (8-12°)  HAI angle (< 10°)  HA angle (15°) 3) PASA & DASA (normal, deviated, subluxed)  Positional (P +D < HA) “subluxed/deviated joint”  Structural (P + D = HA) “congruous joint” 4) Tibial sesamoid position (1-7) 5) Length of 1st met (normal, long, short) using:  Met parabola- (142°)  Met protrusion index (0-2 mm) 6) Metatarsus adductus/Engel (< 15°)  Abnormal MA may mask IM deformity o Lateral View 1) 1st met is (elevated, normal, short) compared to 2nd met using Seiberg’s index  distal distance – proximal distance (+ = Elevatus) o 2) Foot type (pes planus, cavus, normal) -Capsule Tendon Balancing Procedures  Silver (1923) resection of DM eminence w/ lateral capsulotomy and medial capsulorraphy  Mcbride “True” (1928) silver + fibular sesamoid removal and transfer of adductor tendon  Hiss (1931) transfer adductor from plantar to medial  Joplin’s sling (1950) transfer adductor thru met  Component procedures: o Adductor transfer o EHL lengthening o EHB tenotomy o Capsulorraphy (Washington, H, T, Inverted L, Linear) -Osetotomies  Hallux interphalangeus “Distal” Akin  Abnormal DASA “Proximal” Akin (5-10 mm from MPJ)  Abnormal PASA Reverdin 
  • 15. o 1st cut: = to articular surface o 2nd cut:  to long axis o Green plantar cut to protect sesamoids w/ hinge intact o Laird lateral cortical hinge not maintained (IM correction)  True IM < 16° Distal osteotomy o Austin/Kalish/Youngswick stable sag & frontal planes o Mitchell shortens “lateral hinge intact” o Hoffman shortens “trapezoid osteotomy” o Wilson shortens “oblique osteotomy” o Scarf Central cut DD PP w/ 70° angles o Keller resection of prox phalanx base “elderly” o Mckeever fusion “for arthritic joint”  True IM > 16° Proximal osteotomy “hinge axis concept” o Ludloff cut PD DP o Mau cut PP DD “better stability” o Juvara oblique CBW 40° cut “avoid growth plate”  A) wedge B) wedge + hinge cut C) no wedge o CBW/OBW shortens or lengthens 1st met o Cresecentic bad stability o Lapidus hypermobile first or large met/IM o Logroscino Reverdin + CBW -Surgical technique  Single screw halfway b/w line  to long axis & line  to osteotomy  K-wire dorsal distal medial to plantar proximal lateral -Post-op  NWB 4-6 weeks  Serial radiographs -Complications  Hallux varus (staking, aggressive bandage, fibular sesamoid removed, overcorrection on IM) o Systemic Repair of Hallux Varus (McGlamry)
  • 16.  Complete ST release, Correction of structural deformity (IM angle), Tendon transfers, Tibial sesamoidectomy, Joint arthroplasty  Capital fragment on floor (Christenson; 1992) o Mix 1 L NS (+) 1 mL Neosporin irrigant (+) 1:100K Bacitracin o Transfer to 3 different basins w/ solution x5 o Document and tell patient  Others: infection, avn, non-union, fixation failure, shortening, reoccurrence, sesamoiditis
  • 17. Haglunds & Retrocal Exostosis 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM -Introduction  Haglunds posterior-superior painful bursal projection of calcaneus due to enlargement of this cal region o Involves retrocalc & achilles bursa o Caused by: shoe gear irritation or cavus foot  Retrocal Exostosis ensethopathy at achilles tendon o Intratendinous calcification of soft tissues o Traverses “Entire” posterior aspect of heel o Caused by: trauma or overuse causing thickening  DDX: o Calc bursisitis, Achilles tendonitis, Achilles rupture, Tumor -Radiology  Fowler & Phillip (normal 45-70) o Line posterior calc w/ line tangent to PS prominence o Pathologic > 75  Total angle (normal < 90) o Calcaneal inclination (+) Fowler & Phillip o Pathologic > 90  Parallel pitch lines o Line 1 tangent to ant. tuber & medial plantar tuber  Then draw line  to this o Line 2 parallel to “Line 1” and  to perpendicular line o Pathologic bursal projection above “Line 2” -Conservative treatment  Shoe (heel lift, padding, orthotic)  NSAIDS -Surgical treatment (avoid chasing the “bump”)  Keck & Kelly remove wedge from posterior-superior calc
  • 18. o For structural cavus foot type  Duvries lateral incision  F & P Mercedes incision thru achilles, then resect bump  Speed bridge resect bump then reapproximate w/ speed bridge
  • 19. Pes Planus (Flexible vs. Rigid) 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM -Etiology  Flexible o Equinus o Congenital (talipes calcaneovalgus) o Structural (compensated FF varus or valgus) o Ligamentous (PTTD or ligamentous laxity)  Rigid o Tarsal coalition (Syn-desmosis, chondrosis, ostosis)  *TC (12-16), CN (12-8), TN (3-5)  True collation= intra-articular fusion of 2 bones o Congenital (Apert’s or Nievergelt-pearlman)  Both seen with cuneiform coalitions o Trauma (fractures) o Peroneal spasm -Planes of dominance:  STJ axis 42 transverse & 16 sagittal  MTJ “oblique” 52 transverse & 57 sagittal o DF, PF, abduction, adduction  MTJ “longitudinal” 15 transverse & 9 sagittal o Inversion & eversion -Clinical exam  Hubscher maneuver dorsiflex hallux creates windlass mech. o Arch elevation, PF 1st ray, RF supination, Ext leg rotation  ROM (Ankle, STJ, MTJ) o Ankle 10 dorsiflexion & 20 plantarflexion o STJ 10 eversion & 20 inversion o MTJ “longitundal” 4-6  Have patient stand in angle & base o Too many toes sign o RSCP in > 4 valgus
  • 20. o Single heel rise test  Coalition findings o Progressive valgus w/ bow strung peroneal tendons “SPASM” -Classifications  Johnson & Strom o 1) tenosynovitis + mild tendon degeneration “flexible”  Tendon debridement + orthotics o 2) elongated & degenerated + TTS “flexible”  Tendon transfer & RF procedure o 3) elongated & ruptured + inability in SHR test “rigid  Triple or Double arthrodesis o 4) rigid ankle valgus  Triple or TCC arthrodesis  Deland 2A) <30% TN uncover 2B) >30% TN uncover  Funk 1) avulsion 2) ms rupture 3) in-continuity tear 4) tenosyno  Conti (MRI) o 1A) couple long splits 1B) multiple long splits & fibrosis o 2) narrowing of tendon w/ DEGENERATION o 3A) disuse swelling & degen 3B) complete rupture -Radiology  AP view (transverse plane) o TN articulation (75%) DECREASED o TC “Kites” (20) INCREASED o Cuboid Abduction (0-5) INCREASED  Lateral view (sagittal plane) o CI (20) DECREASED o TD (20) INCREASED o LTC (40) INCREASED o Navic-Cub superimposed INCREASED o Cyma line ANTERIOR BREAK o Meary’s (0-15) NEGATIVE “decreased”  Calc axial (frontal plane) o RF eversion “rule out ankle valgus”
  • 21. o Decreased height of sustentaculum  Harris-Beath evaluates middle & posterior facets o Views= 35, 40, 45 axial views  Medial Oblique o Anteater sign “CN coalition”  Lateral Oblique o Anterior facet coalition  CT Scan o Modality of choice for coalition o Asses subtle cortical changes in surrounding -Flexible Procedures:  Goals: o Primary joint stability o Secondary recreate arch height o Most procedures will include TAL procedure  Soft tissue 1) PT repair remove degenerated section 2) FDL TT suture w/in PT sheath to help reestablish arch 3) PB-PL anastomsis removes deforming force  Transverse correction 1) Evans opening wedge 1.5 cm proximal to CC joint 2) CCJ distract arthrodesis lengthens lateral column 3) Kidner advancement & reattachment of PT  Sagittal correction 1) Cotton plantarflexes 1st ray (bone graft) 2) Arthrodesis: o Lowman TN fusion (+) TAL o Hoke NC fusion o Miller NC fusion (+) 1st Met-Cuneiform o Lapidus 1st Met-Cuneifrom fusion 3) Young TS reroute TA thru navicular
  • 22.  Frontal correction 1) Calc Osteotomies: o Dwyer closing wedge osteotomy o Kouts slide fragment medial (increases supination) 2) Arthroeresis (MTJ must have locking ability on RF) o MBA “self-locking” blocks anterior migration of talus  RF valgus or FF varus must be reducible in order to do  Leading edge should approach but NOT cross bisection of talus on AP view  Should allow 2-4 of STJ eversion o STA-Peg (non-ang) “axis-altering” elevates STJ o Sgarlato “direct-impact” impingement force laterally 3) Historical o Chambers- bone graft in “sinus tarsi” o Selakovic- bone graft under “sustentaculum” o Baker & Hill- bone graft under “posterior STJ facet”
  • 23. Pes Cavus 6/30/2014 5:14:00 PM -Etiology  Stable “Static” vs. Progressive o Stable conditions treatable w/ ST procedure  Rigid vs. Flexible o Rigid conditions requires osteotomies & arthrodesis  Bilateral: o *CMT, CP, SC tumor, Spina bifida, Polio, infection o Charcot Marie Tooth (autosomal dominant)  Bilateral slowing of sensory & motor nerve conduction  HSMN I classic CMT usually in 2nd decade (hypertrophic)  HSMN II manifests later in life (axonal)  Unilateral: o Crush syndrome, SC injury, Deep post compart syndrome -Clinical exam  Charcot Marie Tooth o Claw toes- over recruitment of long extensors o Cavus- PL overpowers TA causing PF 1st ray o Foot drop- “stork legs” due to muscle wasting  Coleman Block Test (sagittal plane deformity evaluation) o Forefoot (1st ray) is suspended off a block o FF driven calcaneus returns from varus back to normal o RF driven calcaneus stays in varus after removing forefoot elements o Anterior cavus (apex found at intersection of Meary’s angle)  Caused by: forefoot “PLANTARFLEXED” On rearfoot  Local (1st ray) vs. Global (entire FF)  Flexible (DF at Midfoot) vs. Rigid (pseudoequinus)  Metatarsus apex at lisfranc  Forefoot apex at choparts o Posterior cavus (increased CI angle > 30 & varus position)  Caused by: rearfoot “DORSIFLEXED” on forefoot
  • 24.  Flexible (no change in CI on WB) vs. Rigid (Decreased CI on WB)  Secondary to anterior cavus  Neurological evaluation o Asses motor, sensory systems, reflexes and coordination tests.  Biomechanical evaluation o ROM (AJ, STJ, MTJ) o Wide based gait = neurologic o Extensor substitution HT (exentsors > lumbricales) o Pseduoequinus- ankle must dorsiflex cuz forefoot cant  EMG & Nerve conduction testing -Classifications  Ruch/Surgical -Stage 1 (flexible may appear normal on WB) o Deformity restricted to Metatarsal, MPJ or Digits o Tx: digital fusion, extensor tenotomy, flexor transfers -Stage 2 (more rigid deformity) o Deformity consists of rigid PF 1st ray & RF varus o Tx: DFWO, Dwyer, STATT, Peroneal stop -Stage 3 (marked rigid deformity) o Severe global RF & FF deformity on neuromuscular cause o Tx: MTJ osteotomies, Triple arthrodesis, tendon transfer  Japas o Anterior cavus (apex found at intersection of Meary’s angle)  Caused by: forefoot PLANTARFLEXED On rearfoot  Local (1st ray) vs. Global (entire FF)  Flexible (DF at Midfoot) vs. Rigid (pseudoequinus) 1) Metatarsus apex at lisfranc 2) Lesser tarsus entire lesser tarsal region 3) Forefoot apex at choparts 4) Combined 2 or more of the above o Posterior cavus (increased CI angle > 30 & varus position)  Caused by: rearfoot DORSIFLEXED on forefoot
  • 25.  Flexible (no change in CI on WB) vs. Rigid (Decreased CI on WB)  Secondary to anterior cavus -Radiology  AP view (transverse plane) o TN articulation (75%) INCREASED o TC “Kites” (20) DECREASED o Cuboid Abduction (0-5) DECREASED  Lateral view (sagittal plane) o CI (20) INCREASED o TD (20) DECREASED o LTC (40) DECREASED o Cyma line POSTERIOR BREAK o Meary’s (0-15) POSITIVE “increase” -Operative treatment  Goals must identify apex of deformity/rigid vs. flexible  Soft Tissue Release o Steindler stripping removes all plantar fascia at insertion  PF, Abd hallucis, Abd dmq, FDB, Quad plantae o Plantar medial release release all muscle/ligaments medial o Historical  Borst & Larsen- release mc joints & plantar intrinsics  Garceau & Brahms- resect motor branches  Tendon Transfers (flexible deformities) o Jones EHL thru 1st met head “dorsiflexes hallux” o Heyman EHL & EDL thru each respected met head o Hibbs EDL transferred to 3rd cuneiform o Girdlestone FDL transferred to dorsal prox phalanx o STATT lateral half transferred to p. tertius insertion o TPTT difficult out of phase transfer o Peroneal anastomosis transfer PL to PB “Stop procedure”  Osseous procedures (rigid & neuromuscular)
  • 26. o Cole dfwo at NC “coparts joint” o Japas displacement V osteotomy thru all midfoot joints o Jahss Cole at lisfranc joint o DFMO dorsiflexes forefoot o Dwyer lateral closing wedge “take out of varus”  Arthrodesis o Triple (Ryerson- 1920)  Resect (TN CC TC) ** fix in opposite order  Position:  Dorsiflexion- 0  RF valgus- 5  Abduction- 5  Ext rotation- 15  Incisions  Lateral (fib malleolous to 4th met base)  Exposes TC & CC  Reflect EDB, protect peroneal, incise plug  Inverted L capsular incision  Dissect until visualization of STJ facets  Dorso-Medial (distal med malleolus to NCJ)  Exposes TN  Incision carried longitundal to PT & TA  Fixation  TC aimed posterior-lateral from talar neck (6.5 partial cancellous)  TN screw < 40mm (4.5 cortical) or staple  CC screw < 40mm (4.5 cortical) or staple  Post-op  Admit for pain control  NWB 8 weeks  Progressive PT after 10-12 weeks