Polarization in America has drastically increased over the last 15 years as the number of Americans who hold a mix of Democratic and Republican views has diminished. This polarization is aggravated in part by the way people today see their affiliation with either party as not merely political, but also as a part of their identity. Resulting disagreements are becoming increasingly more personal.
There are at least 4 factors that have contributed to this increased polarization: economic inequality, the internet, a fracturing national media landscape, and a decline in local news. All of these have worked to create a society where people only have to associate and interact with others, news sites, etc, that share their same views and opinions. Where in the 1970s only one-half of all newlyweds shared the same political views, today that number has increased to three-quarters.
While studies and polls will claim that Americans are split 50-50 on our most divisive issues, the reality is far more complex. The far left or far right are in staunch agreement with their side’s view. However, the middle majority tends to actually have a 50-50 split on these issues. We have to find narratives about the big issues like immigration or LGBTQ rights that do not polarize people. Turn “them” into “us” through communication and contact that builds bridges and highlights our common values and identities. Some key strategies for doing that include:
Activating shared values, like family, community, and social good, and shared identities, like parents, sports fans, foodies, etc.
Putting people first in communications, not policy, by again emphasizing shared values and aspirations rather than policy objectives. This will make people more willing to share their stories with their social networks.
Targeting communications at the local level, where a shared sense of community allows for greater trust among participants and a sense of interdependence.
Although national division exists, local communities are far more likely to find common ground. Even non-political engagement can work to decrease isolation and increase social trust, laying the groundwork for potential political action. For example, In areas with neighborhood amenities – coffee shops, libraries, etc – there is decreased isolation and increased social trust. As such, it is important to focus on the local communities and get people talking to each other. The best way to promote change is by motivating and changing communities and groups that already exist. People have to connect and engage in each other’s stories if they are going to be motivated to care for each other.
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
Can Empathy Save the Day? How Fostering Familiarity Can Drive Policy and Wins
1. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 1
Can Empathy Save the Day?
How Fostering Familiarity Can Drive
Policy and Wins
2. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 2
HELLO!
3. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 3
AGENDA The Polarization Problem
1. A quick snapshot of the situation
Why Is This Happening?
1. Understanding political polarization
2. Contributing factors of polarization
How Can We Overcome It?
1. Transform “them” into “us”
2. People first, not policy
3. Localism and contact building
Questions!
4. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 4
The Polarization Problem:
A Snapshot
5. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 5
Polarization: The Partisan Divide
6. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 6
Everything Has Become Politicized
7. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 7
“The American public is no more
divided now over policy than it was 30
years ago...Nonetheless, Americans
believe that their policy divisions are
especially pronounced.”
-Robert B. Talisse, Vanderbilt University
8. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 8
Impact on Issues
9. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 9
Impact on Issues
10. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 10
The Moveable
Middle is Neither
Myth Nor
Monolith
11. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 11
Live Poll
12. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 12
Why Is This Happening?!
1. Understanding Political Polarization
13. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 13
Understanding Political Polarization
Political Polarization is a
complex process.
- Two levels: Elite vs.
mass
- Most pronounced
among highly engaged
- Issue consistency: views
on one issue predict
views on unrelated
topics (e.g. gun control,
climate change)
Asymmetric Polarization: Republicans
have moved further to the right than
Democrats have to the left
Social Polarization: Our social identities are
increasingly aligning with our political
identities (e.g. conservative evangelical and
liberal atheist)
Affective Polarization: Republicans and
Democrats dislike each other more and
trust each other less
14. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 14
Asymmetric Polarization (Elite Level)
15. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 15
Affective Polarization
16. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 16
Polarization: Social Sorting
17. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 17
Polarization: Social Sorting
18. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 18
Causes of Polarization
1) Economic Inequality
a) Democratic legislators have become more liberal on economic issues in response
to rising inequality
2) The Internet & Curating Culture
a) Ideological segregation on the Internet is common
b) Social media algorithms create passive filtering mechanisms
3) Fox News & the Fracturing of the Media Landscape
a) Growth of ideologically diverse media outlets allow consumers to self-select news
4) Decline of Local News
a) Decline of local news has shifted political attention to national news, which
focuses more on conflict and highlights political winners and losers
19. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 19
Political Segregation & The Trump Effect
1) The Internet & Online Dating
a) 40% of new couples meet online, now the most common way for couples to meet
b) Growing preference for political affinity or more sophisticated sorting methods?
2) The Trump Effect
a) Survey of OkCupid users found that 74% said voting for Trump was a “deal
breaker”
b) According to eHarmony, the percentage of their users who advertised their political
affiliation tripled in 2017 compared to the previous year
3) Rising Political Agreement among Married Couples
a) In 1973, 54% of newlyweds shared the same political affiliation. By 2014, 74% did.
b) Why does this matter? Political network homogeneity is associated with more
extreme opinions and more negative outgroup attitudes
20. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 20
Why Is This Happening?!
1. Understanding Political Polarization
2. Contributing Factors of Polarization
21. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 21
22. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 22
Less about… More about…
Policies Values
Parties Identities
Rationality Emotions
Left vs Right Scale Cosmopolitan
There are big rewards in understanding this
shift, and big costs in ignoring it.
● Politics is no longer defined by the old
left/right spectrum of the role of
government
● Increasingly it is played out as a battle
between cosmopolitan and traditional
values
This makes debates about culture and
identity more prominent, and it polarizes
both institutions (e.g., media, civil society)
and issues (e.g., education, immigration).
Beyond Left and
Right
23. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 23
Hidden
Tribes of
America
24. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 24
25. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 25
Issue Patterns and Polarization
26. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 26
In-Group vs Out-Group
Ideological “bubbles” translate
into much larger “Perception
Gaps” regarding the other side.
The more partisan we are, the
more we see the other side as
extreme.
27. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 27
How Can We Overcome It?
1. Transform “Them” Into “Us”
28. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19
“Narrative work, the shifting of consciousness
and values, is not just a long game, it is the long
game. It is not just about finding the right words
to spread particular messages, but the ability to
activate the underlying values and beliefs behind
those messages. It’s about normalizing justice,
inclusivity and equity.”
Towards New Gravity, The Narrative Initiative
29. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 29
Transforming “Them” into “Us”: Shared Identities and Values
Immigrant Inclusion Strategy
● On immigration, Americans worry more about a lack of common values than
common culture.
● Lean on values and common identities to bind us.
○ Values: Family, Community, Social Good
○ Identities: Parents, Sports Fans, Foodies, Game of Thrones Fans
30. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 30
Transforming “Them” into “Us”: Raise Warmth and Competence
Immigrant Inclusion Strategy
● High Warmth/High Competence: Pride/Admiration (People Like Us)
● High Warmth/Low Competence: Pity/Sympathy (Elderly/People w/ disabilities)
● Low Warmth/High Competence: Envy/Jealousy (High Skilled Immigrants)
● Low Warmth/Low Competence: Fear/Disgust
(Refugees/Undocumented/Homeless)
*Fiske, Susan, Stereotype Content Model
31. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 31
How Can We Overcome It?
1. Transform “Them” Into “Us”
2. People First, Not Policy
32. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 32
People First, Not Policy
Lessons From Marriage Equality
1. Message with universal values rather
than policy objectives.
“Rights & Benefits”
“Love & Commitment”
33. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 33
People First, Not Policy
Lessons From Marriage Equality
1. Message with universal values rather
than policy objectives.
2. Urge your community to share their
stories with their concentric circles.
34. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 34
People First, Not Policy
Lessons From Marriage Equality
1. Message with universal values rather
than policy objectives.
2. Urge your community to share their
stories with their concentric circles.
3. Give your audience a stake in the fight
by introducing them to your community.
35. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 35
People First, Not Policy
Trial & Error on Nondiscrimination
36. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 36
How Can We Overcome It?
1. Transform “Them” Into “Us”
2. People First, Not Policy
3. Localism & Contact Building
37. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 37
National Division But Local Agreement
38. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 38
Transforming “Them” into “Us”: Social Contact
Immigrant Inclusion Strategy
● Connecting groups across difference to work on shared goals reduces
prejudice.
● Social contact relieves the anxieties we hold about one another and
allows deeper relationships to form.
● Participants must “have equal status, work on common goals without
competition, and have opportunities for personal interaction.”
● Embrace new and unusual partnerships.
*Allport, Gordon, Social Contact Theory
39. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 39
Transforming “Them” into “Us”: Final thoughts
Immigrant Inclusion Strategy
● Focus on mutual interdependence and shared values.
● Activate identities that bind us.
● Abandon immigrant exceptionalism or struggle stories (they
“other” immigrants.)
● Insights based on deep research.
40. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 40
Transform “Them” into “Us”
through communication and
contact that builds bridges and
highlights our common values and
identities.”
-Wendy Feliz
41. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 41
Live Poll
42. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 42
Questions, Please!
43. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 43
TAKEAWAYS You’re not crazy; it is
tough times out there.
The “moveable middle” is
neither myth nor monolith.
People in-group as instinct;
trigger with care.
3
2
1
44. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 44
TOOLS Activate shared values
and identities.
Put people first, not policy.
Go local.3
2
1
45. BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK| #ComNet19 45
THANK YOU!
Editor's Notes
Self-selecting news sources has been advanced through Internet and social networking platforms; it is easier than every to find confirmatory information online and to filter out dissenting information; machine learning algorithms tailor information to users so that even users not actively seeking ideologically conforming information may unwittingly receive slanted information
But most Americans rely on a variety of different news outlets and older Americans have experienced the greatest degree of political polarization and they are least likely to rely on the Internet for news and information
A few decades ago, on local TV news or in newspapers arriving at readers’ doorsteps, the media consumer was likely to see a lot of content that was targeted to her based on where she lived. Both advertisers and editors thought about their audiences geographically, and tailored their coverage accordingly.
Another poll found that the percent of women using the app who prioritized political characteristics of prospective partners increased from 27% in 2016 to 42% in in 2018