This was a talk to George Washington University students about how the process of government and politics is becoming 'mediatised'. By that I mean that the process of creating and implementing policies, as well as reporting and deliberating upon politics, is becoming saturated in an unprecedented volume and variety of sources, platforms and content creators. This creates a kind of networked politics. This has good aspects and bad.
Agenda Setting theory, a subsidy of Communication theory. This will enable you to get full understanding of the agenda concept.
For assistance, please refer to the document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CN9gew453uO9dYQR0EWsO8qwNOaJPJGr/view?usp=sharing
Week 1 Lecture - Liveness and MediatizationLouise Douse
Title: Liveness and Mediatization
Unit: PER007-1 Applied Choreography: Dance and Innovation
Course: Dance and Professional Practice
Institution: University of Bedfordshire
Tutor: Dr Louise Douse
What happens to mainstream political journalism when it becomes more networked? We are often told that something has gone wrong with the reporting of politics in democracies like the UK. But can new forms of journalism supplemented by social media and citizen input help revive its function as the way that we find out about and debate political ideas and policies?
This lecture tries to show how in the UK and US there are now opportunities for better and more democratic journalism around politics. However, the role of public relations or spin and the failure of journalists to be critical and informed enough, means that the public is not getting the democratic benefit. This lecture looks at the case of the Nick Clegg 'Sorry' video and the Mother Jones story about Mitt Romney's secret 47% speech.
Agenda Setting theory, a subsidy of Communication theory. This will enable you to get full understanding of the agenda concept.
For assistance, please refer to the document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CN9gew453uO9dYQR0EWsO8qwNOaJPJGr/view?usp=sharing
Week 1 Lecture - Liveness and MediatizationLouise Douse
Title: Liveness and Mediatization
Unit: PER007-1 Applied Choreography: Dance and Innovation
Course: Dance and Professional Practice
Institution: University of Bedfordshire
Tutor: Dr Louise Douse
What happens to mainstream political journalism when it becomes more networked? We are often told that something has gone wrong with the reporting of politics in democracies like the UK. But can new forms of journalism supplemented by social media and citizen input help revive its function as the way that we find out about and debate political ideas and policies?
This lecture tries to show how in the UK and US there are now opportunities for better and more democratic journalism around politics. However, the role of public relations or spin and the failure of journalists to be critical and informed enough, means that the public is not getting the democratic benefit. This lecture looks at the case of the Nick Clegg 'Sorry' video and the Mother Jones story about Mitt Romney's secret 47% speech.
Echo chambers (and Filter Bubbles) in Media and Social NetworksPlural (think tank)
Our perception of reality - and of the choices that we have in life - has always been influenced by our surroundings: education, friends, favourite newspaper, Facebook feed etc. On the one hand this allows us to live our values among like-minded people but on the other, it can oversimplify reality and deceive us.
An echo chamber is a group situation where information, ideas and beliefs are amplified or reinforced by transmission and repetition, while different or competing views are censored, disallowed or otherwise under-represented.
This slideshow is summarising pros and cons of Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles in Media and Social Networks.
Strategic communication, news media and influencePOLIS LSE
Slides for a presentation to the NATO defence college in Rome in March 2017 looking at the news and social media context and how it is becoming more networked. It looks at the positive and negative aspects of digital change and the structural shifts in communication, especially in journalism and its consumption and dissemination.
This is a lecture given to visiting GWU students to introduce them to the political media landscape of the UK in the run up to the 2015 General Election. It shows how journalism has become networked as has political communication. It discusses whether this has improved the quality of political debate.
Lecture to the Government Department's GV311 course on journalism and politics. History of relations between news media and politicians and reflections on the last UK Election. Plus consideration of news media role regarding Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party and its role in the EU referendum.
Political journalism and reporting of the 2015 UK General ElectionPOLIS LSE
Lecture on the context for the journalism around the UK 2015 General Election and some first thoughts on the specifics of the reporting of that election.
Is media change creating a more democratic journalism and politics? LSE publi...POLIS LSE
In the first lecture I explained that journalism has traditionally had a role as the Fourth Estate in relation to mainstream politics. I showed that journalism has a particular set of functions in that democratic context of informing, deliberating and accountability. Journalism has many flaws, like politics, but the same things that people criticise in journalism can actually be its strengths.
I ended up by suggesting that the real problem for journalism - and politics in western democracies - is not the inherent failings of these trades but their increasing irrelevance to citizens. In other words, they are losing not authority but attention.
I showed that journalism and its relation to politics has changed over the centuries and more recently for technological, social and economic reasons. But it is arguable at least that journalism has never changed more than in the last couple of decades. What I want to set out today is some thoughts about how these changes might create a different kind of political journalism and ask what impact that might have for democracy itself.
I should say right at the beginning that I don’t know the answer because we are in the middle of this process. The pace of change is rapid. Facebook, which allegedly helped spark revolutions in the Arab world, is only just ten years old. By its very nature, media change self-represents itself in ways that are often unrepresentative of real changes. Much of the evaluation of media change is actually conditioned by people’s social, economic or political perspectives. It is relative, subjective and dynamic. A bit like politics.
This is a lecture on how political journalism is changing in the UK (and with some international case studies) as communications become more networked. It shows that people are given more voice to question power but that there are limits on how much this is really changing politics or democracy. It uses the Clegg 'I'm sorry' episode to highlight the role of humour in this new environment.
Truth, Trust and Technology: How Can Journalism Survive The Information CrisisPOLIS LSE
Based on the LSE Truth, Trust and Technology Commission this analyses the crisis for the news media in the context of the wider information crisis looking at the role of the tech companies.
Truth, Trust and Technology: an agenda for the countering misinformationPOLIS LSE
A lecture setting out the problems being addressed the LSE Truth Trust and Technology Commission of 2018. It sets out the problem, the possible solutions in a conceptual framework.
A lecture given to the NATO Defense College about the LSE Truth, Trust and Technology Commission. The Commission is examining the crisis in public information, fake news, and interference in elections.
Truth, Trust and Technology: strategic communications in an age of misinforma...POLIS LSE
This was a lecture given to the NATO defense college in March 2018. It used the work of the LSE Truth, Trust and Technology Commission to examine the problems of strategic communications and journalism in an age of 'fake news' and disinformation.
Truth, trust and technology Singapore presentation slidesPOLIS LSE
Presentation to 'fake news' conference of Asian Journalism Fellowship in Singapore August 2017
Notes here:
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2017/08/17/truth-trust-and-technology-finding-a-new-agenda-for-public-information/
Lecture to Northwestern London seminar series. It looks at the change in the role of news media in democracy, how the news industry has changed to a more networked system with new publishers and platforms becoming more influential. It examines the rise of fake news and the crisis of trust in news media and how politicians have responded.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxEduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher presents at the OECD webinar ‘Digital devices in schools: detrimental distraction or secret to success?’ on 27 May 2024. The presentation was based on findings from PISA 2022 results and the webinar helped launch the PISA in Focus ‘Managing screen time: How to protect and equip students against distraction’ https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/managing-screen-time_7c225af4-en and the OECD Education Policy Perspective ‘Students, digital devices and success’ can be found here - https://oe.cd/il/5yV
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Mediatisation of politics
1. The Mediatisation of Politics:
what happens when government and journalism
become networked?
Prof Charlie Beckett
GWU Seminar Dec 2014
2. What does journalism do for politics?
• Information
[facts, records, statistics, events,
policies]
• Deliberation
[debate, analysis, comment, opinion]
• Accountability
[investigation, audit, voice for
citizen, campaigns]
8. Media for democracy
• “…the information revolution makes possible
for the first time in history something we have
only dreamt about: A global society where
people anywhere and everywhere can
discover their shared values, communicate
with each other and do not need to meet or
live next door to each other to join together
with people in other countries in a single
moral universe to bring about change….”
9.
10. Media against democracy
• “It used to be thought – and I include myself
in this – that help was on the horizon. New
forms of communication would provide new
outlets to by-pass the increasingly shrill tenor
of traditional media. In fact, the new forms
can be even more pernicious, less balanced,
more intent on the latest conspiracy theory
multiplied by five”
11.
12. The average length of articles about the Prime Minister in the Guardian and
Times halved between 1945 and 2009 but the average number of articles
mentioning the Prime Minister doubled (Langer 2011).
Television news sound bites related to US Presidential campaigns shrank from
just over 43 seconds in 1968 to just under 9 seconds in 1988 and less than 8
seconds in 2004 (Hallin 1994; Bucy 2007).
In its first four-year term, the Blair administration issued 32,000 press releases
(cited in Dean 2012).
The number of civil service information officers doubled in the Cabinet Office
between 1979 and 2006, tripled at the MoD and Prime Minister’s office, and
quadrupled at the Home Office (Davis 2007).
13. The vicious cycle of mediatisation
More, faster
media
Increased
spin control
More cynical
public
More
Politics
becomes
media
orientated
aggressive
social media
& journalism
14. Does it matter?
• Spin: Truthfulness and trust undermined?
• Politicization of civil servants?
• ‘Tail wags the dog’: policy follows a media
agenda?
• Focus on immediate results, not long-term?
• Chilling of policy deliberation?
• Journalism not trusted
15. The (politician’s) problem with
political journalism is..?
• Unaccountable power
• Bias
• Obsession with process
• Cynicism
• Lack of information
• Lack of expertise
• Loss of local press
16. The (journalist’s) problem with
political journalism is..?
• Lack of resources for (political) journalism
• Government secrecy
• Government and party spin and manipulation
• Disintermediation: increased role of social
networks & public relations
17. The (public’s) problem with
political journalism is..?
• Too complicated
• Too cynical
• Too belligerent, biased
• Too much process
• Boring
• Irrelevant – ‘Westminster
bubble’
• Too simplistic
• Not critical enough
• Too complicit – not critical
or radical enough
• Sensationalist
• Not informed enough about
realities of policy-making
24. Potential of new media for democracy
• Gives citizen direct voice
• Gives citizen direct access to information
• Allows citizen to organise and campaign
• Allows the public to critique mainstream
media
25. Dangers of new media democracy
• Fragmentation/polarisation
• Bad information/propaganda
• Distraction
• Short attention span
29. More democratic?
“Journalism will continue to become more plural
in its forms, its functions, and its practitioners.
It will become more difficult to distinguish it
from advocacy political communications,
public relations alternative and participatory
civic information, personal commentary,
poplar culture and so on”
Dahlgren 2009
30. The real problem
for mainstream
politics and
journalism is
engagement,
attention &
authenticity
31. The political role of networked
journalism
• Job of the political journalist becomes to filter,
curate and make relevant the right
information for the right people
• To be public-centred, customer-focused,
reliable, transparent and credible
• While continuing to uphold the traditional
functions of acting as an independent
reporter, investigator and critic of government
32. Keep in touch:
Prof Charlie Beckett
Twitter: @CharlieBeckett
My blog: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/
Email: c.h.beckett@lse.ac.uk
I am also on Facebook and Medium
Editor's Notes
But actually no-one knows if he actually said it at all – so from it’s birth political journalism has been as much about myth as fact
So I think that networked journalism is itself a more democratic form of journalism because it shifts power and engages public participation.
It changes the media model from this
What I am going to argue is that with media change we are moving towards this model
T
More information and data and comment and reporting than every before – throughout the process from policy-making to publication
Fast news cycles because of Internet and 24 hours TV news – public expectations of immediacy and transparency have increased
Loss of control for both politicians and the traditional news media as new sources arise – public can talk amongst themselves and create their own informatin
There is simply more sources – including civil society organisations such as universities but also because of open data and open govt
As journalism becomes more open does it foster great democratic engagement?