A look into The
Effects of
Consumerism and
Pop Culture on a
Democracy

 By: Johnny Gagnon
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and
free in a state of civilization, it expects
   what never was and never will be.”
        –Thomas Jefferson (1816)
Since the dawn of man we as human‟s have
produced, hunted, and scavenged all that was essential to
life, and have done so in large part with little excess.

                                               Until…
• During post World War I and right as the industrial
  revolution was coming to an end, the American
  corporations and manufacturers began a new
  revolution. Selling things to people that they didn‟t
  need.
• With the help of the growing new science
  “psychology,” companies learn to market things to
  people subliminally, rather than trying to convince
  potential buyers with facts and reason.

• They do this by using the concept of the idea of
  „self,‟ and that the clothes that one wears, and the
  things that one owns, helps express who that
  person is.
“A change has come over our
democracy. It is called
consumptionism. The American
citizens’ first importance to his
country is no longer that as
citizen, but now that of
consumer.”

-Samuel Strauss (American
Journalist published in Atlantic
Monthly 1924)
If the Empire State
Building
represented the
entire existence of
man, the age of
„consumerism‟
would only amount
to about 3” of the
building‟s 1454
feet, or about the
size of the aircraft
warning light on top
of the radio
antenna.
The “Shepard of
the Bewildered
Masses”
•   Edward Bernays (1892-
    1995, seen here to the left) was
    the nephew of psycholgy‟s
    foudning father Sigmund Freud.
    He very well might be the most
    influential man you never heard
    of. He combined his Uncle‟s
    theories with that of other
    leading psychoanalysts to
    create many of the marketing
    tactics we still see today. He
    used sex, power, and social
    significance to help sell products
    and ideas to the American
    public.
• Edward Bernays believed the mass mind
  was unreasonable. The “bewildered
  masses,” as he called them, must be made
  docile and distracted, and left to the rule of
  a specialty class beyond locality. He
  believed he could do this by “stimulating
  their inner desires and then sating them
  with consumer products.” He called it “the
  engineering of consent.”
“Within the life of the generation now in control of
affairs, persuasion has become a self-conscious
art and a regular organ of popular government.
None of us begins to understand the
consequences, but it is no daring prophecy to say
that the knowledge of how to create consent will
alter every political calculation and modify every
political premise...It has been demonstrated that
we cannot rely upon intuition, conscience, or the
accidents of casual opinion if we are to deal with
the world beyond our reach.”

1922 Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann (1889-
1974, Pulitzer winning journalist)
My Mission Statement


• I believe that democracy can work, but in order for
  it to function to its potential, education must be a
  democracy’s first priority.

• I also believe that our freedom comes at a cost.
  That cost is a civic duty to stay informed. The casual
  citizen is a democracy’s worst enemy.

• My mission with this project is to look at the effects
  of consumerism and pop culture, to see if there is a
  correlation between excessive consumption and
  those that are politically active and informed.
• If you do, it shouldn‟t be too much of a
  surprise, because according to emarketer.com U.S.
companins spent 168 billion in advertising in 2010 alone.
•    A study done by The
     US National Wildlife
     Foundation (as
     referenced by
     Treehugger.com)
     Showed that children
     at the age of 7 could
     already identify 200
     corporate logos, but
     hardly any local
     plants native to their
     own community.


    • Can you identify this
      local Maine tree?
My Research

• I surveyed/quizzed 36 people on their political
  affiliation, political knowledge, how much they spend in
  excess, how well they know about Corporate
  logos, products etc. and how well they know trivial facts
  pertaining to “pop culture.‟

• The survey quiz was composed of the same 41 self made
  questions that were presented in a random order.
  Sometimes I administered the test in person, and many
  volunteered to take the quiz on their own time via the
  internet.

• http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-
  school/story.php?title=cosumerism-democracy
Warning:

 I want to be up front and admit that some of the questions
 were meant to be tricky. My intentions were to try to
 eliminate educated guessing. Some of the questions
 deliberately have answers that were meant to lure
 anyone who does not know for certain away from the
 correct answer. I did it on both sides, with a few of the
 corporate logos, as well as the few of the political
 questions. I figured anyone who had extensive
 knowledge about the subject would not be fooled by trick
 answers. However I do want to upfront with this now, as it
 probably had an effect on my results.
My Hypothesis

• That those who consume excessively will be less informed
  about current events and politics.

• That there will be a negative correlation between
  knowledge of pop culture and knowledge of politics.
My Results

• I came across many trends with my study. It is hard to say
  that any of them are conclusive however, given the small
  sample size and broad range of questions asked.
  Nonetheless the results go along with other trends I found
  when researching this project.

• I found that with my subjects there was a negative
  correlation with political knowledge and knowledge of
  pop culture. Albeit very minute difference (only about 10
  overall points on average). I attribute this to the overall
  difficulty of my quiz, which I think was low.

• I found that regardless of who they were, or what type of
  consumers they were, the overall knowledge of company
  products and corporate logos was vast.
My Results

• I found that those who claimed to be republican used Fox
  News as a source of news. All of those who claimed to be
  republican listed Fox News as the channel they watched
  most when watching the news, and 0% of all other parties
  and ideologies claim to use Fox News as a primary source.

• In addition, I found that those who claimed to be
  republican were better at identifying politicians positions
  and party affiliations. I also found that they answered
  consistently with the same bias amongst each other on
  less objective questions( e.g. “has the US ever lost a war?).
  While those of all other party affiliations were inconsistent
  when answering the same questions.
Demographic


              democrats

              Republicans

              Independents/
              Non Partisan
              Other
$ Spent on Luxury Items Per Month




                              $0-$100
                              $101-200
                              $201-300
                              $301-400
Excessive Consumers Percentile Amongst the
                     Overall Group
100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

 0%
       Overall % of Product     Overall % of Political
       Knowledge & Pop             Knowledge
           Cultrue
If They Have Ever Received
Government Money or Used A Social
            Program Ever
                No   Yes
                0% 0%


          28%



                        72%
Government Assistance &
      Social Programs
This was one that was meant to trick those who were not
well informed in politics already. However to my surprise I
tricked the majority. I will admit this question is vaguely
worded, and somewhat subjective. However I believe
the question was worded properly enough where not
one single person should have answered no, regardless
of their situation.

The way it was worded I feel as though government
assistance could be anything from
welfare, foodstamps, section 8, to
medicare, medicaid, social security, pel
grant, subsidized loans, earned income
credit, mortagage subsidies etc. Also social programs
could be anything from public education, to fire
services, police services, driving on roads, and even
mailing a letter. I couldn‟t believe how many people
didn‟t take these things into account when answering
• My most shocking result was the
  overwhelming amount of people who do
  not even know their own representative.
  This to me seems very alarming. There
  seemed to be very little difference
  between those subjects with knowledge of
  pop culture, and those that did or did not
  excessively consume. Overall, I found this
  terribly sad, and even alarming on some
  levels.
• Most Surprising thing was that everyone
  aced the part of the quiz that asked people
  to identify the company with their specific
  product. They even knew the difference
  between General Mills cereals and
  Kelloggs! Also even though people could
  not name their representative, you will all
  be pleased to know, not one person got
  the president wrong, (although I got some
  strange spellings on that one), nor the three
  branches of government, or that the
  president has to be 35 years old to be
  elected.
Criticisms
• There could be many factors for why some
  people have become disinterested in
  politics e.g. coverage overload, political
  games, lost faith in the system, or the
  seriousness of their current economic
  situation.

• My survey/quiz covered a broad range.
  Next time I would attempt to make it more
  focus.

• My sample size was very small (36 people)
  and was not broadly represented (mostly
  people my age, my
  friends, liberal, educated, and from
  southern Maine.)
My Conclusion

• That we live in a society in which we are bombarded by
  marketing and advertising, and whether you are aware of
  it or not, you are effected by it on some level.

• In addition we as a society, we need to focus more on
  educating if we want to continue to see our democracy
  succeed. We need to not only focus on teaching our
  citizens, but specifically focusing on expressing the
  importance of our civic duty to remain informed and to
  participate in the voting process as citizens of this nation.
Thank You!
Work Cited
Curtis, Adam. "Happiness Machines." Century of the Self. BBC.
    2002. Television.

"Edward Bernays." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Apr.
    2012. Web. 29 Apr. 2012.
    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays>.

The EMarketer Daily Newsletter." Market Research & Statistics:
    Internet Marketing, Advertising & Demographics. Nov.
    2010. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://www.emarketer.com/>.

Jefferson, Thomas. "Quotations on Education." « Thomas
     Jefferson's Monticello. Thomas Jefferson Foundation INC.
     Web. 28 Apr. 2012.
     <http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/quotations-
     education>.
Work Cited
Lippmann, Walter. Public Opinion. Free Press, 1922. Print.
    Pg. 158

McLaren, Warren. "Logo No Go for Nau. A Peek at Branding
   and Consumerism." TreeHugger. 14 Apr. 2008. Web. 28
   Apr. 2012. <http://www.treehugger.com/culture/logo-no-
   go-for-nau-a-peek-at-branding-and-consumerism.html>.

Strauss, Samuel. Atlantic Monthly Nov. 1924. Print.

"The Empire State Building." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
    Foundation, 29 Apr. 2012. Web. 29 Apr. 2012.
    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Empire_State_Building
    >.

Consumerism & Democracy

  • 1.
    A look intoThe Effects of Consumerism and Pop Culture on a Democracy By: Johnny Gagnon
  • 2.
    "If a nationexpects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” –Thomas Jefferson (1816)
  • 3.
    Since the dawnof man we as human‟s have produced, hunted, and scavenged all that was essential to life, and have done so in large part with little excess. Until…
  • 4.
    • During postWorld War I and right as the industrial revolution was coming to an end, the American corporations and manufacturers began a new revolution. Selling things to people that they didn‟t need. • With the help of the growing new science “psychology,” companies learn to market things to people subliminally, rather than trying to convince potential buyers with facts and reason. • They do this by using the concept of the idea of „self,‟ and that the clothes that one wears, and the things that one owns, helps express who that person is.
  • 5.
    “A change hascome over our democracy. It is called consumptionism. The American citizens’ first importance to his country is no longer that as citizen, but now that of consumer.” -Samuel Strauss (American Journalist published in Atlantic Monthly 1924)
  • 6.
    If the EmpireState Building represented the entire existence of man, the age of „consumerism‟ would only amount to about 3” of the building‟s 1454 feet, or about the size of the aircraft warning light on top of the radio antenna.
  • 7.
    The “Shepard of theBewildered Masses” • Edward Bernays (1892- 1995, seen here to the left) was the nephew of psycholgy‟s foudning father Sigmund Freud. He very well might be the most influential man you never heard of. He combined his Uncle‟s theories with that of other leading psychoanalysts to create many of the marketing tactics we still see today. He used sex, power, and social significance to help sell products and ideas to the American public.
  • 8.
    • Edward Bernaysbelieved the mass mind was unreasonable. The “bewildered masses,” as he called them, must be made docile and distracted, and left to the rule of a specialty class beyond locality. He believed he could do this by “stimulating their inner desires and then sating them with consumer products.” He called it “the engineering of consent.”
  • 9.
    “Within the lifeof the generation now in control of affairs, persuasion has become a self-conscious art and a regular organ of popular government. None of us begins to understand the consequences, but it is no daring prophecy to say that the knowledge of how to create consent will alter every political calculation and modify every political premise...It has been demonstrated that we cannot rely upon intuition, conscience, or the accidents of casual opinion if we are to deal with the world beyond our reach.” 1922 Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann (1889- 1974, Pulitzer winning journalist)
  • 10.
    My Mission Statement •I believe that democracy can work, but in order for it to function to its potential, education must be a democracy’s first priority. • I also believe that our freedom comes at a cost. That cost is a civic duty to stay informed. The casual citizen is a democracy’s worst enemy. • My mission with this project is to look at the effects of consumerism and pop culture, to see if there is a correlation between excessive consumption and those that are politically active and informed.
  • 12.
    • If youdo, it shouldn‟t be too much of a surprise, because according to emarketer.com U.S. companins spent 168 billion in advertising in 2010 alone.
  • 13.
    A study done by The US National Wildlife Foundation (as referenced by Treehugger.com) Showed that children at the age of 7 could already identify 200 corporate logos, but hardly any local plants native to their own community. • Can you identify this local Maine tree?
  • 14.
    My Research • Isurveyed/quizzed 36 people on their political affiliation, political knowledge, how much they spend in excess, how well they know about Corporate logos, products etc. and how well they know trivial facts pertaining to “pop culture.‟ • The survey quiz was composed of the same 41 self made questions that were presented in a random order. Sometimes I administered the test in person, and many volunteered to take the quiz on their own time via the internet. • http://www.proprofs.com/quiz- school/story.php?title=cosumerism-democracy
  • 15.
    Warning: I wantto be up front and admit that some of the questions were meant to be tricky. My intentions were to try to eliminate educated guessing. Some of the questions deliberately have answers that were meant to lure anyone who does not know for certain away from the correct answer. I did it on both sides, with a few of the corporate logos, as well as the few of the political questions. I figured anyone who had extensive knowledge about the subject would not be fooled by trick answers. However I do want to upfront with this now, as it probably had an effect on my results.
  • 16.
    My Hypothesis • Thatthose who consume excessively will be less informed about current events and politics. • That there will be a negative correlation between knowledge of pop culture and knowledge of politics.
  • 17.
    My Results • Icame across many trends with my study. It is hard to say that any of them are conclusive however, given the small sample size and broad range of questions asked. Nonetheless the results go along with other trends I found when researching this project. • I found that with my subjects there was a negative correlation with political knowledge and knowledge of pop culture. Albeit very minute difference (only about 10 overall points on average). I attribute this to the overall difficulty of my quiz, which I think was low. • I found that regardless of who they were, or what type of consumers they were, the overall knowledge of company products and corporate logos was vast.
  • 18.
    My Results • Ifound that those who claimed to be republican used Fox News as a source of news. All of those who claimed to be republican listed Fox News as the channel they watched most when watching the news, and 0% of all other parties and ideologies claim to use Fox News as a primary source. • In addition, I found that those who claimed to be republican were better at identifying politicians positions and party affiliations. I also found that they answered consistently with the same bias amongst each other on less objective questions( e.g. “has the US ever lost a war?). While those of all other party affiliations were inconsistent when answering the same questions.
  • 19.
    Demographic democrats Republicans Independents/ Non Partisan Other
  • 20.
    $ Spent onLuxury Items Per Month $0-$100 $101-200 $201-300 $301-400
  • 21.
    Excessive Consumers PercentileAmongst the Overall Group 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Overall % of Product Overall % of Political Knowledge & Pop Knowledge Cultrue
  • 22.
    If They HaveEver Received Government Money or Used A Social Program Ever No Yes 0% 0% 28% 72%
  • 23.
    Government Assistance & Social Programs This was one that was meant to trick those who were not well informed in politics already. However to my surprise I tricked the majority. I will admit this question is vaguely worded, and somewhat subjective. However I believe the question was worded properly enough where not one single person should have answered no, regardless of their situation. The way it was worded I feel as though government assistance could be anything from welfare, foodstamps, section 8, to medicare, medicaid, social security, pel grant, subsidized loans, earned income credit, mortagage subsidies etc. Also social programs could be anything from public education, to fire services, police services, driving on roads, and even mailing a letter. I couldn‟t believe how many people didn‟t take these things into account when answering
  • 24.
    • My mostshocking result was the overwhelming amount of people who do not even know their own representative. This to me seems very alarming. There seemed to be very little difference between those subjects with knowledge of pop culture, and those that did or did not excessively consume. Overall, I found this terribly sad, and even alarming on some levels.
  • 25.
    • Most Surprisingthing was that everyone aced the part of the quiz that asked people to identify the company with their specific product. They even knew the difference between General Mills cereals and Kelloggs! Also even though people could not name their representative, you will all be pleased to know, not one person got the president wrong, (although I got some strange spellings on that one), nor the three branches of government, or that the president has to be 35 years old to be elected.
  • 26.
    Criticisms • There couldbe many factors for why some people have become disinterested in politics e.g. coverage overload, political games, lost faith in the system, or the seriousness of their current economic situation. • My survey/quiz covered a broad range. Next time I would attempt to make it more focus. • My sample size was very small (36 people) and was not broadly represented (mostly people my age, my friends, liberal, educated, and from southern Maine.)
  • 27.
    My Conclusion • Thatwe live in a society in which we are bombarded by marketing and advertising, and whether you are aware of it or not, you are effected by it on some level. • In addition we as a society, we need to focus more on educating if we want to continue to see our democracy succeed. We need to not only focus on teaching our citizens, but specifically focusing on expressing the importance of our civic duty to remain informed and to participate in the voting process as citizens of this nation.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Work Cited Curtis, Adam."Happiness Machines." Century of the Self. BBC. 2002. Television. "Edward Bernays." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Apr. 2012. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays>. The EMarketer Daily Newsletter." Market Research & Statistics: Internet Marketing, Advertising & Demographics. Nov. 2010. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://www.emarketer.com/>. Jefferson, Thomas. "Quotations on Education." « Thomas Jefferson's Monticello. Thomas Jefferson Foundation INC. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/quotations- education>.
  • 30.
    Work Cited Lippmann, Walter.Public Opinion. Free Press, 1922. Print. Pg. 158 McLaren, Warren. "Logo No Go for Nau. A Peek at Branding and Consumerism." TreeHugger. 14 Apr. 2008. Web. 28 Apr. 2012. <http://www.treehugger.com/culture/logo-no- go-for-nau-a-peek-at-branding-and-consumerism.html>. Strauss, Samuel. Atlantic Monthly Nov. 1924. Print. "The Empire State Building." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 29 Apr. 2012. Web. 29 Apr. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Empire_State_Building >.