3. 2017 AITPM
3
Solution: market-driven parking management
— Set the right price for public parking
— Return parking revenue to improve access alternatives
— Remove minimum parking requirements
The High Cost of Free Parking (Shoup, 2005)
Parking management does not support
sustainable development
YY
Sustainable
development
Agglomeration
economies
Problem:
— Development result in
unsustainable transport
outcomes if not well
managed
— Parking policy often is
not made using
evidence-based
economic principles
4. 2017 AITPM
4
Parking management does not Customer friendly
parking management
Problem:
— No integrated information on options
— Inequitable pricing of options
— Finding available parking
— Over/under-use of parking
— Parking fines discourage visitors
— Parking monopolies lead to overcharging
Solution: Improve customer experience through
— Integrated information on access alternatives
— Integrated journey planning and wayfinding
— Increase availability of short-term parking
— Improve ease of compliance with parking regulation
6. 2017 AITPM
6
What technologies are changing parking
management?
P
payment navigation
journey
planning monitoringcompliance
Smart
Phones
Monitoring
technology
Smart
signage
Connected
vehicles
Integrated parking
management
Open architecture
7. 2017 AITPM
7
Journey planning and navigation
- the role technology can play
INCREASINGVALUE
INCREASINGRISK
APPLICATION EXAMPLE VALUE / RISK
Dynamic
wayfinding signs
― Edinburgh, UK
― Charlotte, NC, USA
V: Intercepts most
drivers
R: Different parking
providers
Integrated parking
information
― San Francisco, Cal, USA
― Manly, NSW
― 3rd party providers
V: Supports customer
decision making
R: Different parking
providers
Multi-modal journey
planning
― Helsinki, Finland
― West Midlands, UK
V: Ease of access to
alternatives
R: Multiple service
providers
Mobile parking
guidance app
― Westminster, UK
― San Francisco, Cal, USA
(partly discontinued)
V: Real-time parking
info in vehicle
R: Driver distraction,
racing for spaces
8. 2017 AITPM
8
Improve ease of compliance – Customer friendly
parking management
― Turnover through pricing, not time limits and fines
― In high demand areas, the longer you park, the
higher the rate:
― Pick-up/drop off = free
― Less than 2 hours = $x per hour
― Every hour more than 2 = $x + $y(additional hours)
― Daily rate capped above off-street parking rate
― Alerts sent to mobile phone when rate changes
― Mobile or credit card payment of time used
― Allows for reduction of parking regulatory signage
9. 2017 AITPM
9
Technology approaches to monitoring parking
PARKING BAY
MONITORING
DATA ANALYTICS
Technologies ― In-ground sensors
― Radar sensors
― Video analytics & ANPR
― Utilisation surveys using
mobile video analytics
― Integration of payment
and survey data
Advantages ― Real-time utilisation data
― Wayfinding to spaces
― Targeted enforcement
― Informed demand
management decisions
― Low cost for parking lots
― Low cost per parking
space
― Data detail appropriate
for management
― Use of available data
― Enforcement can
provide survey data
Risks ― On-street monitoring has
high cost and risks
― Targeted enforcement is
not customer friendly
― Impending obsolescence
― Low accuracy of real
time utilisation
Suitable
applications
― Off-street parking
― Clearways
― Designated parking bays
― On-street parking
10. 2017 AITPM
How do we
prepare for the
future?
Source: State Library of Queensland
11. 2017 AITPM
11
— Connected vehicle technology
— Soon to be standard in all new cars
— Can link with parking management systems
— Simplify detection, customer interface and payment
— Automated vehicle and driverless vehicle technology
— likely to be broadly available by 2020
— expected to be common between 2025 and 2040
— Will significantly disrupt transport and parking
— Without policy intervention it could cause
— increased traffic congestion
— reduced parking demand
— Increased pick-up & drop-off demand
Is the future exciting, or scary?
12. 2017 AITPM
12
Technology that can respond to change
— Open standards and architecture
— Supplier and technology agnostic and plural
— Interoperability and interchangeability of technology
— Australian National ITS Architecture aligned
Supportive policy frameworks that harness technology
— Pricing to manage demand for pick-up/drop-off
— Road user charges based on occupancy
— Parking demand management outside centres
— Parking and battery powered vehicle charging
— Land use policies reducing need to drive
Future proofing parking management
Editor's Notes
parking managmenet is changing rapidly over the next 10 years
How do we ensure parking managmenet technology can sustainably respond to these changes
Providing accurate and timely information to customers is essential to informing their journey planning and travel. Journey planning and navigational aids such as Google Maps have significantly improved customer access to travel information. However currently there is no single journey planning and navigation tool that provides comprehensive information to inform true multi-modal journey planning.
Charlotte - The Charlotte Wayfinding and Parking Guidance System includes real-time
parking supply information in Charlotte’s Central Business District. The
system directs motorists from the Uptown freeways to public parking that is
convenient to their destination. From parking facilities and transit stations,
pedestrian-scaled directional signs and maps identify routes to and from
major public destinations in Uptown. Finally, the system directs the motorist
back to the roadway network through a set of egress directional signs.
It is always a negative experience for customers to receive a parking fine. Irrespective of how seamless the payment of fines is made, no customer enjoys receiving a fine for a parking infringement. Parking enforcement is generally seen by customers as inequitable. Some of the main reasons for this are:
The fine is the same irrespective of the extent of the infringement. For instance, an overstay of five minutes receives the same fine as an overstay of 30 minutes.
An infringement notice is only issued if a parking officer happens to be in the vicinity. Since most cities cannot afford 100% enforcement coverage there is a high probability that most infringements will not result in a fine.
The public often perceive parking enforcement as a revenue raising exercise that unfairly targets customers based on time limits that are perceived as arbitrary.
There is a perception that people can avoid paying their parking fines and there are no consequences for them.
The customer experience of enforcement can be significantly improved by implementing measures to increase the ease with which customers can comply and avoid parking tickets.
Relax/remove time restrictions and manage with price
Auckland, NZ
Jersey, NJ, USA
San Francisco, Cal
increase customer visits to centres, Simpler signage
reduced revenue from fines offset by increased payment revenue
Unless proactively engaging and responding to these vehicle technology changes, cities will miss the opportunities presented, and run the risk of being unable to handle the negative consequences. There is thus a need for technology investments to incorporate flexibility to be able to respond to change. The policy environment needs to proactively shape the desired future for the city that harnesses the opportunities and limits the negative consequences of change.
Technological advancements have created significant opportunities for the integrated management of parking to support sustainable outcomes for cities. However, sustainable transport and land use outcomes cannot be achieved by implementing technology solutions in isolation from good policy. Technology is only a tool that should be used to support the implementation of integrated transport, land use and parking management policies that support sustainable outcomes.
In the very near future the impending disruptive changes in vehicle technology will create significant opportunities and challenges for cities in the management of their transport and road space. Any investments in parking technology systems need to include the flexibility to capitalise from the disruptive changes in vehicle technology. To prepare for the future of driverless vehicles, cities need to examine their transport, parking management and land use policies to identify how system investments and policy changes can create a city environment that will support sustainable outcomes. This will allow the city to evolve and positively adapt to changes in vehicle technology as they occur.