Grading Rubric for Nursing Case Studies (5 points) Definition Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. Case studies are meant to connect real-world scenarios with theoretical teachings. Students are expected to test assumptions and find creative ways to consider all the facets contributing to analysis of the case. Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample or collection of work that does not meet Benchmark level performance. Rubric Critical Elements Proficient 1 Accomplished 0.9 Benchmark 0.8 Explanation of Issues Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. APA Formatting and Style Paper is well organized with a compelling introduction supported by strong evidence. The paper has a well-developed body, analysis, and conclusion. Demonstrates greater than 95% compliance with APA format and grammar rules. Attribution is well documented. Paper has strong introduction, body, analysis, and conclusion. Paper demonstrates between 85%-95% compliance with APA style and format. Student has a clear understand of attribution for synthesis of several authors. Paper is organized and has an introduction, body, limited analysis and a conclusion. Paper demonstrates 80-85% compliance with APA format and Style. Appropriately and accurately paraphrases and summarizes without distortion of original content. Evidence Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion Information is taken from the case with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Greater than 85% of the referenced articles are from discipline specific peer-reviewed journals and 15% of sources may come from interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journals with synthesis from disciplines evident. Information is taken from the case with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning, but not well developed. Greater than 20% of references come from discipline specific peer-reviewed journals and 10% of references come from interdisciplinary sources, with enough analysis to develop a coherent consensus. Information is taken from cases with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. 5-20% of the references come from discipline specific peer-reviewed journal ...

1. Grading Rubric for Nursing Case Studies (5 points)
Definition
Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the
comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events
before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. Case
studies are meant to connect real-world scenarios with
theoretical teachings. Students are expected to test assumptions
and find creative ways to consider all the facets contributing to
analysis of the case.
Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample
or collection of work that does not meet Benchmark level
performance.
Rubric
Critical Elements
Proficient
1
Accomplished
0.9
Benchmark
0.8
Explanation of Issues
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and
described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information
necessary for full understanding.
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described,
and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by
omissions.
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but
description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities
unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds
unknown.

2. APA Formatting and Style
Paper is well organized with a compelling introduction
supported by strong evidence. The paper has a well-developed
body, analysis, and conclusion. Demonstrates greater than 95%
compliance with APA format and grammar rules. Attribution is
well documented.
Paper has strong introduction, body, analysis, and conclusion.
Paper demonstrates between 85%-95% compliance with APA
style and format. Student has a clear understand of attribution
for synthesis of several authors.
Paper is organized and has an introduction, body, limited
analysis and a conclusion. Paper demonstrates 80-85%
compliance with APA format and Style. Appropriately and
accurately paraphrases and summarizes without distortion of
original content.
Evidence
Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view
or conclusion
Information is taken from the case with enough
interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis
or synthesis.
Greater than 85% of the referenced articles are from discipline
specific peer-reviewed journals and 15% of sources may come
from interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journals with synthesis
from disciplines evident.
Information is taken from the case with enough
interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or
synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning, but not well
developed. Greater than 20% of references come from discipline
specific peer-reviewed journals and 10% of references come
from interdisciplinary sources, with enough analysis to develop
a coherent consensus.
Information is taken from cases with some
interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent
analysis or synthesis.

3. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little
questioning. 5-20% of the references come from discipline
specific peer-reviewed journals.
Influence of Context and Assumptions
Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own (if
applicable) and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the
relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Is mindful of
the contextual principles of the specific discipline for which the
student is enrolled specifically cultural considerations in case
analysis.
Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant
contexts when presenting a position. Is mindful of other’s
assumptions and considers cultural considerations in
understanding and analyzing cases.
Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant
contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of
others' assumptions than one's own (or vice versa).
Shows increasing awareness of cultural considerations in
analysis of case.
Conclusions and Related Outcomes (Implications and
Consequences)
Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and
implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed
evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives
discussed in priority order.
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including
opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and
implications) are identified clearly.
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information
is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes
(consequences and implications) are identified clearly.
Grading Rubric for Nursing Case Studies (5 points)

4. Definition
Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the
comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events
before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. Case
studies are meant to connect real-world scenarios with
theoretical teachings. Students are expected to test assumptions
and find creative ways to consider all the facets contributing to
analysis of the case.
Evaluators are encouraged to assign a zero to any work sample
or collection of work that does not meet Benchmark level
performance.
Rubric
Critical Elements
Proficient
1
Accomplished
0.9
Benchmark
0.8
Explanation of Issues
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and
described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information
necessary for full understanding.
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described,
and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by
omissions.
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but
description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities
unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds
unknown.
APA Formatting and Style
Paper is well organized with a compelling introduction
supported by strong evidence. The paper has a well-developed
body, analysis, and conclusion. Demonstrates greater than 95%

5. compliance with APA format and grammar rules. Attribution is
well documented.
Paper has strong introduction, body, analysis, and conclusion.
Paper demonstrates between 85%-95% compliance with APA
style and format. Student has a clear understand of attribution
for synthesis of several authors.
Paper is organized and has an introduction, body, limited
analysis and a conclusion. Paper demonstrates 80-85%
compliance with APA format and Style. Appropriately and
accurately paraphrases and summarizes without distortion of
original content.
Evidence
Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view
or conclusion
Information is taken from the case with enough
interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis
or synthesis.
Greater than 85% of the referenced articles are from discipline
specific peer-reviewed journals and 15% of sources may come
from interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journals with synthesis
from disciplines evident.
Information is taken from the case with enough
interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or
synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning, but not well
developed. Greater than 20% of references come from discipline
specific peer-reviewed journals and 10% of references come
from interdisciplinary sources, with enough analysis to develop
a coherent consensus.
Information is taken from cases with some
interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent
analysis or synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little
questioning. 5-20% of the references come from discipline
specific peer-reviewed journals.
Influence of Context and Assumptions

6. Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own (if
applicable) and others' assumptions and carefully evaluates the
relevance of contexts when presenting a position. Is mindful of
the contextual principles of the specific discipline for which the
student is enrolled specifically cultural considerations in case
analysis.
Identifies own and others' assumptions and several relevant
contexts when presenting a position. Is mindful of other’s
assumptions and considers cultural considerations in
understanding and analyzing cases.
Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant
contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of
others' assumptions than one's own (or vice versa).
Shows increasing awareness of cultural considerations in
analysis of case.
Conclusions and Related Outcomes (Implications and
Consequences)
Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and
implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed
evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives
discussed in priority order.
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including
opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and
implications) are identified clearly.
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information
is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes
(consequences and implications) are identified clearly.