1. The ethical dilemma involves a 6-year-old child diagnosed with meningitis who's parents disagree on treatment. The mother, who has custody, refuses treatment for religious reasons while the biological father insists on treatment. 2. The physician must decide whether to treat the child against the mother's wishes but with the father's support, or respect the mother's refusal of care for religious reasons and risk the child's health. 3. Any resolution must carefully consider both parents' rights and priorities, as well as the child's medical needs and wellbeing.

1. Apply Ethical framework in practice(Healthcare)
Apply Ethical framework in practice(Healthcare)Apply Ethical framework in
practice(Healthcare)Permalink: https:// /apply-ethical-fr…acticehealthcare/Order
DescriptionApplying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps
outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making
model and use the model to analyze the case provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops
a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is
rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and
requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced.
The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a
Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons.
The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that
treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another
physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following
questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the decision-making model you
selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?4.
Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to
the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).A minimum of
three references must be used.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are
required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student
Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.Please Note:
Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under
“Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents Turnitin Report
Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach
documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant

2. changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models.
Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context
of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the
relationships of stakeholders.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis
Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;
contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose
of the paper clear.5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

3. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is
seamless.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0
% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not
used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used,
but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements
are correct.3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page
is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present
and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.100 % Total WeightageApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your
readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case
provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting
and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending
physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment
from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no
medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in
another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent
consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200
words, answer the following questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this
dilemma using the model?4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which
you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment

4. according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
“Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents
Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment
or attach documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models.

5. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context
of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the
relationships of stakeholders.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis
Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;
contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose
of the paper clear.5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is
seamless.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0
% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not
used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used,
but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements
are correct.3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page
is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present
and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.100 % Total WeightageApplying Ethical Frameworks in

6. Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your
readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case
provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting
and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending
physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment
from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no
medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in
another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent
consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200
words, answer the following questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this
dilemma using the model?4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which
you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment
according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
“Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents
Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment
or attach documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution

7. Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models.
Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context
of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the
relationships of stakeholders.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis
Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;
contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose
of the paper clear.5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is
seamless.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although

8. a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0
% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not
used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used,
but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements
are correct.3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page
is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present
and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.100 % Total WeightageApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your
readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case
provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting
and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending
physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment
from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no
medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in
another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent
consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200
words, answer the following questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this
dilemma using the model?4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which
you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment
according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
“Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents
Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment
or attach documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical

9. dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes app