WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docxmelbruce90096
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %
Section 1: Boundary Issues and Dual Relationships 2.1: Evaluate elements of counselor-client relationships within the practice of professional counseling, focusing on professional ethical standards.
Essay omits or incompletely develops a discussion of ethical dual relationships criteria and examples as specified in the assignment. Section does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Develops an incomplete discussion of ethical dual relationships. Only vaguely or inappropriately identifying criteria relevant to the decision-making process concerning ethical and appropriate boundary-crossing or dual relationships between counselors and clients. Provides incorrect/irrelevant application of the criteria to example situations. Presents less than the required number of situation examples. Section demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
Includes a discussion of ethical dual relationships. Includes basic criteria used to determine whether particular boundary-crossings or dual relationships between counselors and clients are ethical and appropriate. Applies the criteria to situations where dual relationships are complex and ambiguous. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Includes a thorough discussion of ethical dual relationships that includes criteria to determine whether particular boundary-crossings or dual relationships between counselors and clients are ethical and appropriate. Applies the criteria to situations where dual relationships are complex and ambiguous, making clear explanations on the connections between the situations. Presents the required number of examples. Section demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
Includes a thorough discussion of ethical dual relationships that includes criteria to determine whether particular boundary-crossings or dual relationships between counselors and clients are ethical and appropriate. Applies the criteria to situations where dual relationships are ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Community Prevention Project250.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Community Related Health Concerns: Identify Vector-Related Diseases Affecting Community20.0%Diseases are not vector-related; vector-related diseases presented are not relevant to the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases are presented and relevant to the local community; evidence is not presented to support claims; evidence used is not substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are partially substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. More relevant evidence is needed for support. Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are generally substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. Vector-related diseases are relevant to the local community. Claims are strongly substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Identify Current Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Applicable to Public Health Issues20.0%Current environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are not identified.Some environmental risk methods are referenced; the environmental risk methods are not current, or are not applicable to public health issues.General environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; most environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues.Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues, but more supporting detail is needed. Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are clearly identified; environmental risk methods are current, applicable and highly relevant to public health issues.Propose Modifier, New Prevention or Intervention Program 20.0%No modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested.Reference is made to a modifier, new prevention or intervention program. No evidence or details are offered for support.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Some evidence is provided for support, but suggestion lacks support to demonstrate relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Evidence is provided that generally demonstrates support and relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docxeugeniadean34240
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Ethical C.
Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
ViewG View Grading Rubrics
Counselor Ethics and Responsibilities Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Counselor Values
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the ethical issues. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view.
Surface level of evaluation of the ethical issues is offered. Minimal rationale presented. Expresses a preference in a personal point of view, but lacks details. Discusses a counseling plan for the client, but lacks supporting rationale.
Describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Includes essential knowledge about personal values and attitudes with supporting details and resources.
Comprehensively describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge is excellent. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Clearly describes personal values and attitudes in depth with extensive details and resources.
20.0 %Client Rights
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria.
Lists the five ethical principles and discusses how they relate to client rights. Explains how these rights will be incorporated into professional practice with minimal details and/or rationale. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered.
Presents a detailed outline of the relationship between the five ethical principles and how they relate to client rights. Explains how these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with supporting details, and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the relationship between the five ethical principles and client rights. Explain show these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with extensive details and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Responsibility to Warn and Protect
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Factors involved in decision making are vague or not present.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evi ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docxmelbruce90096
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %
Section 1: Boundary Issues and Dual Relationships 2.1: Evaluate elements of counselor-client relationships within the practice of professional counseling, focusing on professional ethical standards.
Essay omits or incompletely develops a discussion of ethical dual relationships criteria and examples as specified in the assignment. Section does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Develops an incomplete discussion of ethical dual relationships. Only vaguely or inappropriately identifying criteria relevant to the decision-making process concerning ethical and appropriate boundary-crossing or dual relationships between counselors and clients. Provides incorrect/irrelevant application of the criteria to example situations. Presents less than the required number of situation examples. Section demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.
Includes a discussion of ethical dual relationships. Includes basic criteria used to determine whether particular boundary-crossings or dual relationships between counselors and clients are ethical and appropriate. Applies the criteria to situations where dual relationships are complex and ambiguous. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Includes a thorough discussion of ethical dual relationships that includes criteria to determine whether particular boundary-crossings or dual relationships between counselors and clients are ethical and appropriate. Applies the criteria to situations where dual relationships are complex and ambiguous, making clear explanations on the connections between the situations. Presents the required number of examples. Section demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.
Includes a thorough discussion of ethical dual relationships that includes criteria to determine whether particular boundary-crossings or dual relationships between counselors and clients are ethical and appropriate. Applies the criteria to situations where dual relationships are ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Community Prevention Project250.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Community Related Health Concerns: Identify Vector-Related Diseases Affecting Community20.0%Diseases are not vector-related; vector-related diseases presented are not relevant to the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases are presented and relevant to the local community; evidence is not presented to support claims; evidence used is not substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are partially substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. More relevant evidence is needed for support. Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are generally substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. Vector-related diseases are relevant to the local community. Claims are strongly substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Identify Current Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Applicable to Public Health Issues20.0%Current environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are not identified.Some environmental risk methods are referenced; the environmental risk methods are not current, or are not applicable to public health issues.General environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; most environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues.Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues, but more supporting detail is needed. Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are clearly identified; environmental risk methods are current, applicable and highly relevant to public health issues.Propose Modifier, New Prevention or Intervention Program 20.0%No modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested.Reference is made to a modifier, new prevention or intervention program. No evidence or details are offered for support.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Some evidence is provided for support, but suggestion lacks support to demonstrate relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Evidence is provided that generally demonstrates support and relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75.003.docxeugeniadean34240
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Ethical C.
Top of FormViewG View Grading RubricsCounselor Ethics and Re.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
ViewG View Grading Rubrics
Counselor Ethics and Responsibilities Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Counselor Values
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate and clearly express own point of view.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the ethical issues. Formulates a vague and indecisive point of view.
Surface level of evaluation of the ethical issues is offered. Minimal rationale presented. Expresses a preference in a personal point of view, but lacks details. Discusses a counseling plan for the client, but lacks supporting rationale.
Describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Includes essential knowledge about personal values and attitudes with supporting details and resources.
Comprehensively describes the process/plan in which counseling would or would not be provided, considering all ethical implications. Subject knowledge is excellent. Formulates a clear and precise personal point of view. Clearly describes personal values and attitudes in depth with extensive details and resources.
20.0 %Client Rights
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria.
Lists the five ethical principles and discusses how they relate to client rights. Explains how these rights will be incorporated into professional practice with minimal details and/or rationale. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered.
Presents a detailed outline of the relationship between the five ethical principles and how they relate to client rights. Explains how these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with supporting details, and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the relationship between the five ethical principles and client rights. Explain show these principles will be incorporated into professional practice with extensive details and/or rationale. Informed consent is explicitly and thoroughly addressed in this description. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Responsibility to Warn and Protect
Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Factors involved in decision making are vague or not present.
Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details. Little subject knowledge is evi ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docxlascellesjaimie
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesi.
DetailsMitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic .docxraelenehqvic
Details:
Mitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic of much research including the creation of methods to measure the extent of these behaviors. In this assignment, you will evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words in which you evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Include the following in your paper:
1. An evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures
2. An evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not?
Measuring Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
35.0 %
Evaluative Summary of the Properties of Psychometrically Sound Measures Benchmarks C 3.3: Evaluate and identify properties of psychometrically sound measures.
No evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented.
A vague evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
30.0 %
Evaluation of the Methods Used to Measure Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
No evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented.
A vague evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorou.
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
Top of Form1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Discuss the Usefulness of Applying a Heritage Assessment in Evaluating the Needs of the Whole Person.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is not offered.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, or does not meet criteria for word count.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person meets requirements of the assignment.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered in detail.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 %Family Interviews
Interview of three families from different cultures not offered.
Interview of three families from different cultures is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information regarding the comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures.
Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures meets requirements of the assignment.
Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures is offered in detail.
Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 %Identifying Common Health Traditions
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is not offered.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered, but is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage meets requirements of the assignment.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered in detail.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 %Evaluate How Families Subscribe to These Traditions and Practices
Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is not offered.
Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is offered, but is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices me ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Health Assessment Part I150.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 15.0%Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria. The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions. Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)15.0%Description of family structure omitted.A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.Family Health and Health Behaviors15.0%Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear. Health behaviors and current health of the family.
PICOT Statement Paper1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than S.docxmattjtoni51554
PICOT Statement Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue
Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed.
Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.
Clinical problem/issue is identified but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal improvement.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be improved using nursing interventions.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.
30.0 %Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based
Solution
, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice
Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity and the corresponding elements are not included.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical problem/issue resolution.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.
10.0 %PICOT Statement .
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docxwillcoxjanay
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal analysis and vertical analysis.
Use the corporation you selected for the Week 4 discussion or another corporation when responding to the two following questions. In your response identify the selected corporation. Please note that substantive responses add new topic related information to help move the discussion forward and do not summarize what was previously posted by another student.
Teachers question below
As a manager, how will you use the horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet for intracompany comparisons? How do managers and investors use the vertical analysis of the income statement and balance sheet compared to competitor corporations when performing intercompany comparisons? Identify at least one competitor corporation and include an explanation as to why or how you selected the competitor.
Reference
Kimmel, P. D. (2013). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection.
Please read INSTRUCTORS instructions carefully and completely
My organization that I choose is Starbucks
Due date 4/21/15 in 4 to 6 hours
No plagiarism in own words
Will run through a plagiarism checker
Will not accept if after due date will dispute
References page must include a valid URL to take the reader to the electronic copy of each source.
If cannot complete with the given instructions do not reply
Please contact me if you have questions
Write as a discussion with another student
Make a question out of the response, or I found the material interesting, or what do you think
I may ask to change some areas at later date
100 to 200 word count
Word count is counted by answer only
Please write with question first followed by answer
Please write clearly simplify
I am in the U.S.
No charts or graphs
Interview a teacher in the elementary grades regarding the teacher's social studies instruction. Include at least eight questions.
Create your own questions such as:
1.Do you use a textbook?
2.What do you think of the standards for social studies?
3.How much time is spent per day in this subject area?
Document the interview questions and answers and submit with the Standards Essay.
Standards Essay
Choose one grade level in the elementary grades. Evaluate the social studies standards on the Arizona Department of Education's website for that grade level for such things as thoroughness, clarity, and two other criteria of your own choosing.
Write an essay of 750-1,000-words as a well-supported, objective, academic response to the interview and standards investigation, analyzing how social studies is currently taught today.
Use the GCU Library to research a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles that support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1 ...
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the te.docxcheryllwashburn
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Interview a person of your choice (they may be your parents, relatives, or friends). These questions must address the following:
Cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during the interviewee's Maturity stage of adulthood (age 65 or older).
How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her lifetime.
What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development of morals.
How the interviewee's experiences have formulated who he or she is as a Mature adult.
Note: American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines indicate that interviewees have the right to refuse to answer any question posed to them by an interviewer. Please ensure that your interviewees are aware of this, and do not force them to answer where the opportunity to reply has been refused.
Pick one of the theories reviewed in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words, discussing the selected theory and how it relates to your interview. Include the following in your paper:
A description of the selected theory.
A description of your interviewee (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.)
How the interviewee's responses illustrate the selected theory. Support your response with examples.
Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the text in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THERE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 4 SCHOLARY RESOURCES USED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN IN APA FORMAT.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Selected Theory
Does not include a description of the selected theory.
Includes an inaccurate or vague description of the selected theory.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by included an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance to the topic.
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the selected theory by providing an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance on the topic.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by including a detailed and accurate description of the theory as well as major points of importance to the topic and clearly ties the information provided to the practice of professional counseling.
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Interviewee (Gender, Age, Ethnicity, etc.)
Does not include a description of the interviewee and/or the person interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment.
A minimal description of the interviewed was included and/or the person interviewed was minimally appropriate for the assignmen.
Apply RubricsEpidemiology Paper Part One Descriptive Method .docxjewisonantone
Apply Rubrics
Epidemiology Paper Part One: Descriptive Method
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Demonstrates an Understanding of Descriptive Epidemiology and Its Relationship to Nursing Science and Public Health Nursing
Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of descriptive epidemiology or its relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper shows a vague understanding of descriptive epidemiology, but does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper illustrates a general understanding of descriptive epidemiology, and shows a general relationship to nursing science and public health nursing, but lacks a clear understanding of data collection, conditions, or distribution and determinants in relationship to disease in populations.
Paper illustrates a theoretical understanding of descriptive epidemiology through an accurate discussion of distribution and disease determinants in populations. Paper demonstrates the functional relationship between descriptive epidemiology and nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper illustrates a theoretical and conceptual understanding of descriptive epidemiology and offers insight into using specific conditions (outcomes of exposure, person, place, etc.) to identify specific patterns. Paper shows the significant relationship between descriptive epidemiology and contemporary nursing science and public health nursing.
20.0 %Uses Contemporary Theories, Concepts, and Examples That Demonstrate an Ability to Identify, Analyze, and Apply Descriptive Epidemiology
Paper does not use contemporary theories, concepts, or examples as support or in the analysis of the paper.
Paper uses some aspects of contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper, but no relevant examples are used. Overall, the concepts and theories used are incomplete or inaccurate and do not support the analysis or application of descriptive epidemiology.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper, and general examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories used are very general and offer only minor support of the analysis or application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
20.0 %Demonstrates Knowledge of Health Disparities and the Variables Contributing to Health Disparity or At-Risk Populations
Paper does .
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docxaudeleypearl
Research Question?
1. What strategic, tactical and operational choices should A&S Service implements to increase its profit by 5% in the next 2 years in Denmark?
Sub Questions:
1. What is the current position of A&S Service in Danish Market?
2. What are the potential opportunities to encourage A&S growth in Danish Market?
3. What could be the marketing strategies that A&S Service should use to maximize its B2B customers?
Table of Contents
1. About the Thesis
2. Problem Area
2.1 Problem Formulation
2.2 Sub-Questions
3. Delimitation and limitation
4. Research Methods Chapter
4.1 Research Philosophy
4.2 Research Approach
4.3 Research methods
4.4 Time Horizon
4.5 Data Collection
4.6 Critic of Source
5. Theoretical Chapter/logical flow
6. Case Company
6.1 Company Overview
7. Internal Analysis
7.1 Business Model Canvas (BMC)
7.2 Company Mission and Vision
7.3 VRIO
7.4 Financial Performance
7.5 ST of SWOT Analysis
8. External Analysis
8.1 PEST Analysis
8.2 Porters Five Forces
8.3 OT of SWOT Analysis
9. Strategic, Tactical and Functional aspects
9.1 Porter’s Generic Strategies
9.2 Ansoff’s Growth Matrix
9.3 STP Model (Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning)
9.4 Marketing Mix
10. Budget and Action Plan
11. Conclusion
12. Appendices
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-433VNRS-433V-O502Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations200.0CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory (83.00%)4: Good (94.00%)5: Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent75.0%Qualitative Studies5.0%Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.A position statement is not real qualitative research.7.50/10.00Background of Study10.0%Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.18.80/20.00Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue15.0%Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT ...
Top of FormStrategic Management and Organizational Change 1.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Strategic Management and Organizational Change
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %Address Types of Health Care Organizational Structure, Including How the Type of Structure Impacts the Process and Effectiveness of Change
Does not demonstrate understanding of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the distinction between organizational and transformational change, and does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for making the distinction between organizational and transformational change, and does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates knowledge of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change, but has some slight misunderstanding of the distinction between organizational and transformational change. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Develops an acceptable distinction between organizational and transformational change. Utilizes some examples of leadership models, tools, and advice.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Clearly differentiates between organizational and transformational change. Introduces appropriate examples of leadership models, tools, and advice.
30.0 %Integrates Information From Outside Resources Into the Body of Paper
Does not use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully, analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflec ...
Clinical Assignment Quality Improvement Project Part 1GoalWilheminaRossi174
Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Project Part 1
Goal:
· To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of your Quality Improvement Project.
· Create a description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.
Content Requirements:
1. Identify the clinical issue that will be the focus of your Quality Improvement project.
2. Provide rationale for the need to change the status quo.
3. Identify best practices from the literature related to the issues.
Submission Instructions:
· The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
· The paper is to be 2 - 3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
· Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
· Your paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
· Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
· Note: this is first part of your Quality Improvement Project. You should revise/improve your work based on your professor's feedback. In module 7, you will be putting all the parts together to complete and submit your final project.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-493NRS-493-O501Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval50.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal5.0%The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed10.0%Th ...
RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docxjoellemurphey
Rubric
Discussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which Are Performing at Acceptable Levels
No discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented.
A discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented, but the discussion is not connected to the data given.
A cursory discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is loosely connected to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion connects reasonably to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is clearly, logically, and directly connected to the data given.
25.0 %Explanation of Which Principles of Consulting and Coaching Would most Effectively be Applied to Improve Organizational Performance Benchmarks C 4.3: Apply principles of interpersonal and group consulting and coaching to improve organizational performance.
No explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented.
A vague explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Regression Equation and Justification of Hiring Decision
No regression equation and justification of hiring decision are presented.
The regression is not clearly visible. A vague justification of hiring decision is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A cursory justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough and insightful and justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from current schola ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Health Organization Case Study200.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade30.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is not provided.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions. Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is offered in detail.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is not provided.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated by the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is not offered.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing mee.
RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75..docxSUBHI7
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %E ...
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docxlascellesjaimie
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesi.
DetailsMitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic .docxraelenehqvic
Details:
Mitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic of much research including the creation of methods to measure the extent of these behaviors. In this assignment, you will evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words in which you evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Include the following in your paper:
1. An evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures
2. An evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not?
Measuring Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
35.0 %
Evaluative Summary of the Properties of Psychometrically Sound Measures Benchmarks C 3.3: Evaluate and identify properties of psychometrically sound measures.
No evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented.
A vague evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
30.0 %
Evaluation of the Methods Used to Measure Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
No evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented.
A vague evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorou.
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
Top of Form1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Discuss the Usefulness of Applying a Heritage Assessment in Evaluating the Needs of the Whole Person.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is not offered.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information, or does not meet criteria for word count.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person meets requirements of the assignment.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered in detail.
Discussion of the usefulness of applying a heritage assessment in evaluating the needs of the whole person is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 %Family Interviews
Interview of three families from different cultures not offered.
Interview of three families from different cultures is offered, but incomplete, lacking relevant information regarding the comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures.
Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures meets requirements of the assignment.
Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures is offered in detail.
Interview of three families from different cultures that provides comparison of the differences in health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration among the cultures is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 %Identifying Common Health Traditions
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is not offered.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered, but is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage meets requirements of the assignment.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered in detail.
Identification of common health traditions based on your cultural heritage is offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.
20.0 %Evaluate How Families Subscribe to These Traditions and Practices
Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is not offered.
Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices is offered, but is incomplete, lacking relevant information.
Evaluation of how family subscribes to these traditions and practices me ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505Family Health Assessment Part I150.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 15.0%Interview questionnaire is omitted. The interview questionnaire presented does not include family-focused functional health patterns. More than three of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Four or more of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions.The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is inconsistent with the assignment criteria. The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or not relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included, and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and relevant to the scope of the assignment.The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly relevant open-ended questions. Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, environment)15.0%Description of family structure omitted.A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing. There are inaccuracies.A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into family structure.Family Health and Health Behaviors15.0%Health behaviors and current health of the family are not presented.Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall, the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear. Health behaviors and current health of the family.
PICOT Statement Paper1Unsatisfactory0.00 2Less than S.docxmattjtoni51554
PICOT Statement Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Identification of Clinical Problem/Issue
Clinical problem/issue is not identified, and resolution is not addressed.
Clinical problem/issue is identified with little discussion of resolution or patient outcome.
Clinical problem/issue is identified but not supported with clinical observations or evidence. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome shows minimal improvement.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on clinical observation experience or evidence in literature. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can be improved using nursing interventions.
Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention.
30.0 %Clinical Problem/Issue, Including Description, Evidence-Based
Solution
, Nursing Intervention, Patient Care, Health Care Agency, and Nursing Practice
Clinical problem/issue is not described with clarity and the corresponding elements are not included.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue and setting, with few of the following elements explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a basic understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, and the patient population. The following elements are explained: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice. Minimal rationale is provided to support the resolution of the clinical problem/issue.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a thorough understanding of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and why it is a problem/issue. The following elements are explained in detail: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and patient care consistent with specific health care agency and nursing practice. Sound rationale is provided supporting the clinical problem/issue resolution.
Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution.
10.0 %PICOT Statement .
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docxwillcoxjanay
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal analysis and vertical analysis.
Use the corporation you selected for the Week 4 discussion or another corporation when responding to the two following questions. In your response identify the selected corporation. Please note that substantive responses add new topic related information to help move the discussion forward and do not summarize what was previously posted by another student.
Teachers question below
As a manager, how will you use the horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet for intracompany comparisons? How do managers and investors use the vertical analysis of the income statement and balance sheet compared to competitor corporations when performing intercompany comparisons? Identify at least one competitor corporation and include an explanation as to why or how you selected the competitor.
Reference
Kimmel, P. D. (2013). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection.
Please read INSTRUCTORS instructions carefully and completely
My organization that I choose is Starbucks
Due date 4/21/15 in 4 to 6 hours
No plagiarism in own words
Will run through a plagiarism checker
Will not accept if after due date will dispute
References page must include a valid URL to take the reader to the electronic copy of each source.
If cannot complete with the given instructions do not reply
Please contact me if you have questions
Write as a discussion with another student
Make a question out of the response, or I found the material interesting, or what do you think
I may ask to change some areas at later date
100 to 200 word count
Word count is counted by answer only
Please write with question first followed by answer
Please write clearly simplify
I am in the U.S.
No charts or graphs
Interview a teacher in the elementary grades regarding the teacher's social studies instruction. Include at least eight questions.
Create your own questions such as:
1.Do you use a textbook?
2.What do you think of the standards for social studies?
3.How much time is spent per day in this subject area?
Document the interview questions and answers and submit with the Standards Essay.
Standards Essay
Choose one grade level in the elementary grades. Evaluate the social studies standards on the Arizona Department of Education's website for that grade level for such things as thoroughness, clarity, and two other criteria of your own choosing.
Write an essay of 750-1,000-words as a well-supported, objective, academic response to the interview and standards investigation, analyzing how social studies is currently taught today.
Use the GCU Library to research a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles that support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1 ...
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the te.docxcheryllwashburn
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Interview a person of your choice (they may be your parents, relatives, or friends). These questions must address the following:
Cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during the interviewee's Maturity stage of adulthood (age 65 or older).
How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her lifetime.
What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development of morals.
How the interviewee's experiences have formulated who he or she is as a Mature adult.
Note: American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines indicate that interviewees have the right to refuse to answer any question posed to them by an interviewer. Please ensure that your interviewees are aware of this, and do not force them to answer where the opportunity to reply has been refused.
Pick one of the theories reviewed in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words, discussing the selected theory and how it relates to your interview. Include the following in your paper:
A description of the selected theory.
A description of your interviewee (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.)
How the interviewee's responses illustrate the selected theory. Support your response with examples.
Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the text in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THERE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 4 SCHOLARY RESOURCES USED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN IN APA FORMAT.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Selected Theory
Does not include a description of the selected theory.
Includes an inaccurate or vague description of the selected theory.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by included an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance to the topic.
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the selected theory by providing an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance on the topic.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by including a detailed and accurate description of the theory as well as major points of importance to the topic and clearly ties the information provided to the practice of professional counseling.
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Interviewee (Gender, Age, Ethnicity, etc.)
Does not include a description of the interviewee and/or the person interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment.
A minimal description of the interviewed was included and/or the person interviewed was minimally appropriate for the assignmen.
Apply RubricsEpidemiology Paper Part One Descriptive Method .docxjewisonantone
Apply Rubrics
Epidemiology Paper Part One: Descriptive Method
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Demonstrates an Understanding of Descriptive Epidemiology and Its Relationship to Nursing Science and Public Health Nursing
Paper does not demonstrate an understanding of descriptive epidemiology or its relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper shows a vague understanding of descriptive epidemiology, but does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship to nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper illustrates a general understanding of descriptive epidemiology, and shows a general relationship to nursing science and public health nursing, but lacks a clear understanding of data collection, conditions, or distribution and determinants in relationship to disease in populations.
Paper illustrates a theoretical understanding of descriptive epidemiology through an accurate discussion of distribution and disease determinants in populations. Paper demonstrates the functional relationship between descriptive epidemiology and nursing science and public health nursing.
Paper illustrates a theoretical and conceptual understanding of descriptive epidemiology and offers insight into using specific conditions (outcomes of exposure, person, place, etc.) to identify specific patterns. Paper shows the significant relationship between descriptive epidemiology and contemporary nursing science and public health nursing.
20.0 %Uses Contemporary Theories, Concepts, and Examples That Demonstrate an Ability to Identify, Analyze, and Apply Descriptive Epidemiology
Paper does not use contemporary theories, concepts, or examples as support or in the analysis of the paper.
Paper uses some aspects of contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper, but no relevant examples are used. Overall, the concepts and theories used are incomplete or inaccurate and do not support the analysis or application of descriptive epidemiology.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper, and general examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories used are very general and offer only minor support of the analysis or application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
Paper uses contemporary theories and concepts throughout the paper. Accurate and strong examples are used for support. Overall, the concepts and theories provide support of the analysis and application of descriptive epidemiology presented in the paper.
20.0 %Demonstrates Knowledge of Health Disparities and the Variables Contributing to Health Disparity or At-Risk Populations
Paper does .
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docxaudeleypearl
Research Question?
1. What strategic, tactical and operational choices should A&S Service implements to increase its profit by 5% in the next 2 years in Denmark?
Sub Questions:
1. What is the current position of A&S Service in Danish Market?
2. What are the potential opportunities to encourage A&S growth in Danish Market?
3. What could be the marketing strategies that A&S Service should use to maximize its B2B customers?
Table of Contents
1. About the Thesis
2. Problem Area
2.1 Problem Formulation
2.2 Sub-Questions
3. Delimitation and limitation
4. Research Methods Chapter
4.1 Research Philosophy
4.2 Research Approach
4.3 Research methods
4.4 Time Horizon
4.5 Data Collection
4.6 Critic of Source
5. Theoretical Chapter/logical flow
6. Case Company
6.1 Company Overview
7. Internal Analysis
7.1 Business Model Canvas (BMC)
7.2 Company Mission and Vision
7.3 VRIO
7.4 Financial Performance
7.5 ST of SWOT Analysis
8. External Analysis
8.1 PEST Analysis
8.2 Porters Five Forces
8.3 OT of SWOT Analysis
9. Strategic, Tactical and Functional aspects
9.1 Porter’s Generic Strategies
9.2 Ansoff’s Growth Matrix
9.3 STP Model (Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning)
9.4 Marketing Mix
10. Budget and Action Plan
11. Conclusion
12. Appendices
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-433VNRS-433V-O502Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations200.0CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory (83.00%)4: Good (94.00%)5: Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent75.0%Qualitative Studies5.0%Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.A position statement is not real qualitative research.7.50/10.00Background of Study10.0%Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.18.80/20.00Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue15.0%Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT ...
Top of FormStrategic Management and Organizational Change 1.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Strategic Management and Organizational Change
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %Address Types of Health Care Organizational Structure, Including How the Type of Structure Impacts the Process and Effectiveness of Change
Does not demonstrate understanding of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the distinction between organizational and transformational change, and does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for making the distinction between organizational and transformational change, and does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates knowledge of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change, but has some slight misunderstanding of the distinction between organizational and transformational change. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Develops an acceptable distinction between organizational and transformational change. Utilizes some examples of leadership models, tools, and advice.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of health care organizational structure and how the type of structure impacts the process and effectiveness of change. Clearly differentiates between organizational and transformational change. Introduces appropriate examples of leadership models, tools, and advice.
30.0 %Integrates Information From Outside Resources Into the Body of Paper
Does not use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully, analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflec ...
Clinical Assignment Quality Improvement Project Part 1GoalWilheminaRossi174
Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Project Part 1
Goal:
· To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of your Quality Improvement Project.
· Create a description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.
Content Requirements:
1. Identify the clinical issue that will be the focus of your Quality Improvement project.
2. Provide rationale for the need to change the status quo.
3. Identify best practices from the literature related to the issues.
Submission Instructions:
· The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
· The paper is to be 2 - 3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
· Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
· Your paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
· Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
· Note: this is first part of your Quality Improvement Project. You should revise/improve your work based on your professor's feedback. In module 7, you will be putting all the parts together to complete and submit your final project.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-493NRS-493-O501Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval50.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal5.0%The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed10.0%Th ...
RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docxjoellemurphey
Rubric
Discussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which Are Performing at Acceptable Levels
No discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented.
A discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented, but the discussion is not connected to the data given.
A cursory discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is loosely connected to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion connects reasonably to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is clearly, logically, and directly connected to the data given.
25.0 %Explanation of Which Principles of Consulting and Coaching Would most Effectively be Applied to Improve Organizational Performance Benchmarks C 4.3: Apply principles of interpersonal and group consulting and coaching to improve organizational performance.
No explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented.
A vague explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Regression Equation and Justification of Hiring Decision
No regression equation and justification of hiring decision are presented.
The regression is not clearly visible. A vague justification of hiring decision is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A cursory justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough and insightful and justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from current schola ...
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-451VNNRS-451VN-O502Health Organization Case Study200.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade30.0%Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is not provided.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions. Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is offered in detail.Case study assesses the readiness of the health care organization or network in addressing the health care needs of citizens in the next decade is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is not provided.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated by the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to network growth; is offered in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Case study includes a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing10.0%Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is not offered.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing is provided; however, relevant information is missing as indicated in the assignment instructions.Case study including a strategic plan that addresses issues pertaining to nurse staffing mee.
RUBRIC1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory75..docxSUBHI7
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 %E ...
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
1. Apply Ethical framework in practice(Healthcare)
Apply Ethical framework in practice(Healthcare)Apply Ethical framework in
practice(Healthcare)Permalink: https:// /apply-ethical-fr…acticehealthcare/Order
DescriptionApplying Ethical Frameworks in Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps
outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making
model and use the model to analyze the case provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops
a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is
rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and
requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced.
The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a
Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons.
The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that
treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another
physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following
questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the decision-making model you
selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?4.
Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to
the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).A minimum of
three references must be used.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines
found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not
required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are
required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student
Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.Please Note:
Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under
“Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents Turnitin Report
Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach
documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
2. changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models.
Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context
of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the
relationships of stakeholders.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis
Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;
contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose
of the paper clear.5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
3. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is
seamless.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0
% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not
used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used,
but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements
are correct.3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page
is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present
and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.100 % Total WeightageApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your
readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case
provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting
and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending
physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment
from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no
medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in
another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent
consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200
words, answer the following questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this
dilemma using the model?4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which
you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment
4. according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
“Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents
Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment
or attach documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models.
5. Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context
of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the
relationships of stakeholders.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis
Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;
contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose
of the paper clear.5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is
seamless.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0
% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not
used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used,
but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements
are correct.3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page
is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present
and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.100 % Total WeightageApplying Ethical Frameworks in
6. Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your
readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case
provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting
and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending
physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment
from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no
medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in
another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent
consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200
words, answer the following questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this
dilemma using the model?4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which
you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment
according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
“Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents
Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment
or attach documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
7. Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes appropriate language and describes the resolution based on ethical models.
Dialog is an appropriate exchange relating the ethical decision-making model to the context
of the issue and its resolution. Dialog is a rich exchange of appropriately phrased
information which reinforces the model and resolution, drawing upon issue context and the
relationships of stakeholders.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis
Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and forecast development of paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the
arguments and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive;
contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose
of the paper clear.5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and
transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in
organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a
sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is
seamless.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are
present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although
8. a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Format2.0
% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not
used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used,
but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements
are correct.3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,
and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page
is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently
used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present
and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.100 % Total WeightageApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice View RubricDetails:Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your
readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case
provided.Case Scenario:A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting
and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending
physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment
from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological
parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no
medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in
another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent
consultation from another physician.Assignment:In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200
words, answer the following questions:1. What is the ethical dilemma here?2. Describe the
decision-making model you selected from your readings.3. How would you resolve this
dilemma using the model?4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which
you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would
understand).A minimum of three references must be used.Prepare this assignment
according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to
Turnitin.Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the
“Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.New AttemptTitle Attached Documents
Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionClick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment
or attach documentsDetails:Apply RubricsApplying Ethical Frameworks in
Practice1Unsatisfactory71.00% 2Less Than Satisfactory75.00% 3Satisfactory79.00%
4Good89.00% 5Excellent100.00%80.0 %Content20.0 % Identifies Ethical Dilemma Does
not identify an ethical dilemma; or identifies an ethical dilemma but provides no analysis of
the ethical implications. Identifies an ethical dilemma. But the description of the ethical
9. dilemma is very vague; or the analysis of the ethical implications of the situation lack
significant detail; or, only one side of the ethical dilemma has been analyzed. Significant
changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. There is limited discussion of
relevant context and exploration of implications. Identifies and describes an ethical
dilemma in a clear summary, but lacks details to fully represent all sides of the ethical
dilemma; or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires more details, rationale, or
support. Moderate changes are needed to accurately convey the ethical dilemma. Relevant
context and thorough discussion of issue are provided. Identifies implications and
consequences from a practice perspective. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma,
some minor details are missing, or, the analysis of the ethical implications requires minor
details. Only minor changes are needed. Analysis of issue is comprehensive. Explores issue
with broad perspective, identifying underlying relationships between stakeholders and
among socially constructed systems. Identifies and describes an ethical dilemma with clear
details. The analysis of the ethical dilemma has sufficient detail to clearly represent all
aspects of ethical dilemma clearly.40.0 % Identifies Decision-Making Model and Resolution
Does not adopt a decision-making model. Does not describe a resolution to the issue.
Applies decision-making model incorrectly. Does not explain significance of applying model
to the resolution of the issue. Applies decision-making model as a foundation for the
identified resolution and provides very basic rationale for its application, given the context
of the issue presented. More information is needed on the use of the decision-making
model; or more support is needed for the rationale presented for the resolution of the
ethical dilemma. Applies decision-making model with clearly distinct understanding of
relationships among ideas. Identifies resolution that is appropriate based on the context of
the issue, existing relationships and sociocultural factors. Minor changes are needed to
improve supporting statements leading to the resolution. Integrates decision-making model
in a complex process of judgment and justification with comprehensive discussion of
implications for the identified resolution. Clearly articulates significance of model to the
resolution with a thorough discussion of strengths and limitations.20.0 % Includes Family
Dialog Dialog is absent. Dialog is included, but language is inappropriate or incorrectly used.
Dialog includes app